Mazda CX-3 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

What's the difference?

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

The Toyota Yaris Cross Urban is a city-savvy SUV that’s easy to park, nimble in traffic, and relatively fun to drive. It’s cute as a button on the outside, but the cabin doesn’t quite match the price, and some of the tech feels a little behind the times compared to rivals. The hybrid powertrain definitely earns it points but is it worth the jump in price over its rivals? A hesitant yes, because who doesn't like efficiency? But it needs a cabin upgrade to stay truly competitive in our market.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

The Yaris Cross is genuinely adorable. It's compact enough to slip into tight city spaces, yet proportioned well enough that it never looks toy-like. Its upright stance gives it a bit of attitude, and the chunky black plastic moulding around the base actually works in its favour, adding a tough, almost adventurous edge.

The rear is one of its best angles, with crisp LED tail-lights and a clean, sculpted shape that gives it more presence than you’d expect from something this small.

Inside, though, things don’t climb to the same heights. There’s a lot of hard plastic throughout, and while the synthetic leather and cloth upholstery looks decent, it doesn't elevate the space. The tech is well positioned and the layout is tidy, making it a pleasant cabin overall but there’s an unmistakable sense of 'nice, but not quite enough,' especially given what you’re paying.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

The front row is easily the best place to be, with the most comfort and creature comforts on offer. Only the driver’s seat is powered, and the controls not the most intuitive to use but both seats have decent padding and single-level heating that makes longer drives more bearable. The new centre armrest feels like an afterthought as it sits too low and tilts too far forward to be truly comfortable.

The rear row is cosy and realistically suited to two adults. Behind my driving position (I’m 168cm), there’s enough knee and head room, but the smaller door apertures may make loading child seats a bit fiddly. You do get two ISOFIX points and three top tethers, but two seats will fit best. My nine-year old loves how light the doors are to open and close, though he isn’t thrilled about the taller windowsills as they block a fair bit of the outside world for smaller passengers.

Storage is better than expected up front with a mid-size glovebox, a storage tray underneath the air-vents and climate control panel. There are two cupholders and drink bottle holders in each row and the rear also gets a single map pocket.

The 8.0-inch media display shares is straightforward to use and the touchscreen is responsive. It’s easy to connect to the wireless Apple CarPlay and it maintained a steady connection all week. The basic sound system can sound a bit tinny when you’re full-pelt on the highway but is otherwise sufficient.

You miss out on a wireless charging pad on all grade levels, which I really missed, and the only two USB-C ports in the car are up front.

Boot space depends on the drivetrain. The front-wheel-drive Urban has a decent 390L, which feels competitive. The Stonic can take 352L. The all-wheel-drive version offers less at 314L, which is smaller than the Juke (422L).

In real-world terms, groceries, school gear and my son’s extracurricular chaos all fit without complaint. You also get an adjustable boot floor, a temporary spare wheel (not always a given in a hybrid) and a powered tailgate for extra convenience.

The Yaris Cross range spans four grades, and for this review we’re in the second-from-the-top Urban. The GR Sport is technically the flagship, but the Urban feels like the smarter pick as it carries most of the premium features without climbing the price ladder just to wear a GR badge. A badge that doesn’t mean as much here as it does elsewhere in Toyota’s line-up. A GR performance hot hatch it is not.

Priced from $36,930 before on-road costs, the Urban front-wheel drive is pricier than some of its closest rivals. The Nissan Juke Ti is a touch pricier at $37,940, while the Kia Stonic GT-Line is a much cheaper $32,480. Both competitors also offer rear USB ports, and the Juke adds dual 12.3-inch displays and a much larger boot, so the premium you’re paying here really comes down to the Urban’s hybrid powertrain.

Other hybrid rivals include the freshly launched Suzuki Fronx (from $28,990) or the slightly larger Chery Tiggo 4 hybrid ($34,990 drive-away for the Ultimate).

This model-year update brings a modest bump in equipment, now including wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, cloud-based satellite navigation, an armrest up front and illuminated vanity mirrors.

The practical bits are covered with a powered driver’s seat, keyless entry, push-button start, a temporary spare tyre, single-zone climate control, and a powered tailgate.

A few bougie touches like the cloth/synthetic leather mix and heated front seats help lift the cabin, too.

Tech-wise, you get an 8.0-inch touchscreen, a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster, a coloured head-up display, digital radio, Bluetooth, steering-wheel controls and a 360-degree camera system. A standard audio setup rounds things out.

All up, it’s got enough but only just.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

All Yaris Cross variants share the same 1.5-litre three-cylinder hybrid setup, producing 85kW of power combined and 120Nm of torque from the petrol engine. Toyota does not provide combined torque figures for its hybrid powertrains.

On paper, those numbers look a bit anaemic but in practice the hybrid system does a good job of masking the low torque. Around town, it feels livelier than you’d expect, with that electric assist giving it just enough punch to feel almost spritely off the line.

Our test car is the front-wheel-drive version, but you can opt for all-wheel drive for a couple of grand extra.

Compared with rivals, the Yaris Cross lands in an interesting middle ground. The Nissan Juke makes 84kW of power, while the Kia Stonic sits at 74kW.

And that’s really where the critique lands, because while the Yaris Cross feels zippy and eager at low speeds thanks to the hybrid boost, once you’re outside the city the torque deficit becomes harder to ignore. Overtaking and keeping up to speed aren’t the real issues - it’s more that the engine starts to whine like it’s under a bit of duress when you ask for more.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

The Urban FWD has an impressively low claimed combined fuel consumption of 3.8L/100km, and with its 36L fuel tank, you’re looking at a theoretical driving range of up to 950km, which isn't bad for an urban trawler. In real-world use, including longer highway trips and everyday city errands, I averaged 4.4L/100km, which is still very efficient.

By comparison, the Nissan Juke Ti uses 5.8L/100km with a 46L tank, while the Kia Stonic GT-Line sits at 5.4L/100km with 45L. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses 5.4L as well.

The Yaris Cross not only sips fuel but makes the most of its smaller tank, which means the hybrid powertrain wins this round.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

Power delivery is crisp and punctual, and while the engine can sound strained when you push it on the open road, it rarely translates into any noticeable lag. You won’t feel deep reserves of power, but there’s enough to keep up with traffic and overtake when needed.

Ride comfort is better than expected, with suspension that soaks up smaller bumps, and it corners confidently without too much body roll. The cabin picks up a lot of road noise, and there’s an annoying electric whine at lower speeds but it's easily drowned out with music.

Steering is on the lighter side but remains responsive, making the Yaris Cross genuinely easy to drive. It would make a great first car, or a simple, fuss-free choice for an older couple.

Visibility is excellent, giving you a solid sense of the car’s dimensions which is a big help when manoeuvring and that's even before you look at the 360-degree camera feed. Add in the small 10.6m turning circle, and parking this SUV is almost effortless. If you struggle, it’s not the car’s fault.

The Yaris Cross has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing done in 2021 and has eight airbags, including a front centre airbag, which is good for the segment. It scores well across individual assessment sections with an 86 per cent for both adult and child protection, 78 per cent for vulnerable road user and 82 per cent for its safety assist systems.

There is a healthy suite of safety equipment including lane keeping aid, traffic sign recognition, blind-spot monitoring, safe exit assist, rear cross-traffic alert, and auto high beam. There are also seatbelt reminders (audio/visual), two ISOFIX child-seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points.

The adaptive cruise control is fairly well calibrated, although it can occasionally slow down too much on a corner, and none of the safety systems are annoyingly intrusive. A welcome change as it’s been a while since I’ve been in a car that hasn’t yelled at me.

The Yaris Cross has autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with car, pedestrian, cyclist and intersection detection which is operational from 10 - 180km/h but it is more common to see this feature operate from 5.0km/h.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.

The Yaris Cross comes with Toyota’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, extendable up to seven years if you stick to servicing at a Toyota centre. That makes it more competitive as the Nissan Juke offers a 10-year term and the Kia Stonic comes standard with seven years.

Servicing is also straightforward and affordable, thanks to Toyota’s five-year capped-price program, with each service costing just $255. Intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.