Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Suzuki Vitara

What's the difference?

The Hyundai Ioniq 5 Epiq N-Line AWD leverages an electric powertrain’s best attributes brilliantly well.

It’s ultra smooth and comfortable with ample performance and great dynamics thanks in part to this car’s N Line spec.

Its price tag pits it against formidable competition from the German Big Three, Tesla and others. But it has what it takes in terms of quality and value to fight that battle. It’s an impressive machine.

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

Is this a big hatchback or a mid-size SUV? I’m on team hatchback, while Hyundai defines the Ioniq 5 as an SUV.

But who cares? They’re just words and the fact is even after close to three years in market this five-seater looks fresh and contemporary thanks to its confident, chiselled lines and wide stance.  

For car-spotters the N Line exterior treatment consists of flat aluminium badging, specific bumpers front and rear, with a deeper nose spoiler incorporating larger vents to cool the front brakes.

There’s also body-coloured cladding and side skirts, gloss black mirror caps, unique 20-inch alloy rims and a ‘hidden’ lighting signature across the top of the front bumper.

Inside there are Alcantara- and leather-appointed seats, an N Line-exclusive partially-perforated leather steering wheel, red contrast stitching and accents, and brushed metal covers on the pedals.

Add in the twin 12.3-inch screens display and this understated, super-cool interior comes to life with a sporty twist. 

The Ioniq 5 scores points for a manual dial for audio control and an Ioniq 5 update earlier this year included a row of simple-to-use buttons for the ventilation system and another on the centre console for seat comfort settings and more. A sensible blend of physical and digital controls.

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

At just over 4.6m long, a little under 1.9m wide and a fraction more than 1.6m tall the Ioniq 5 comfortably fits the medium SUV profile.

But arguably its most significant dimension is a 3.0m wheelbase which is huge for a car of this size as evidenced by the wheels pushed out to the corners.

What that means is plenty of space inside, but before you can even get in the capacitive touch power door handles may look cool and help aero performance with their flush fit design but I’m not a fan. They’re hard to grip most of the time and don’t work well from an ergonomic point-of-view.

That said, once inside the front seats are adjustable six ways to Sunday and at 183cm tall I have plenty of head space and breathing room in general.

In terms of storage there are big pockets in the doors with room for bottles and thanks to the ‘shift-by-wire’ gear controller located on the steering column there’s room between the seats for a substantial console including a pair of cupholders, a slot for devices and a lidded tray (which doubles as a centre armrest) with that whole rear section able to swing up to allow access to a large lower shelf underneath.

In fact, the entire console unit easily slides fore and aft to liberate more legroom for the centre rear position. There’s also an oddments cubby in the lower part of the dash and a decent glove box.

Then, for connectivity and power there are three USB-C sockets (one in the dash switchable to streaming), a wireless device charging pad and a 12-volt outlet.

In the back that long wheelbase comes into its own. Sitting behind the driver’s seat set for my position I have loads of foot, leg and headroom.

Storage runs to door pockets with room for bottles, a fold-down centre armrest with a pair of cupholders, there are netted map pockets on the front seat backs and pull-up sun shades on the rear windows.

There are controls for the front passenger seat on the inner edge of the front passenger seat backrest which allows rear seaters to adjust its position. Thoughtful.

For power there’s a pair of USB-C sockets and individual ventilation controls in the back of the B-pillars is welcome. 

Then, not only is the electrically-adjustable rear seat split 60/40 in the backrest, it’s in the cushion, as well, which adds extra flexibility in terms of a balance between rear passenger space and room in the boot.

The boot is generous at 527 litres (VDA) with the rear seat upright and 1587L when it’s folded down.

There’s also a handy 24L ‘frunk’ under the bonnet, a decent portion of which is devoted to the (included) charging cable.

Interestingly, the Ioniq 5 AWD is rated to tow a 1600kg braked trailer with a trailer pre-wiring package standard. 

There’s a repair/inflator rather than a spare tyre, which is never a good thing, but there is a ‘smart’ power tailgate and a ‘Vehicle-to-Load’ function that allows you to power and/or charge three-pin appliances from the car. Handy.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

From $39,990 (all prices are drive-away unless stated otherwise), 2026’s cheapest Vitara, the Turbo Hybrid 2WD, seems provocatively expensive for an 11-year-old generation. And the all-wheel drive (AWD) model dubbed 'AllGrip' is a heady $46,000. Oof.

This puts the base Vitara’s price well above Chinese hybrid equivalents like the Haval Jolion HEV and MG ZS Hybrid+, about on a par with popular small-SUV hybrids including the Honda HR-V, Hyundai Kona and Toyota Corolla Cross, and in company with lower-spec petrol-powered iterations of the Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Seltos, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-30, Mitsubishi ASX, Mitsubishi Outlander, Nissan X-Trail, Renault Duster, Subaru Crosstrek, Skoda Kamiq, Volkswagen T-Cross and VW T-Roc.

Facing a lion’s den of fierce rivals is putting things mildly. The Vitara’s value struggles to stack up.

But consider this.

Back in 2015, the base Vitara cost $23K, drive-away – or $31.4K in 2026 money adjusted for inflation. However, that was for a 1.6-litre petrol manual; the auto added the equivalent of another $2.7K and the optional turbo that came soon after (dubbed 'BoosterJet' – and now standard equipment) cost another $6.8K, coming to $41K.

Huh. Suzuki isn’t being so delusionally greedy, then.

And that’s not taking in the latest model’s unique hybrid tech, extra safety of advanced driver-assist technologies (ADAS) such as autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert (RCTA), lane departure warning and blind-spot monitoring, or Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity, or a host of other extra features that have since been applied to an evolving Vitara over the years. Plus, import costs from Hungary are said to have skyrocketed.

If we compare what the 2026 Turbo Hybrid 2WD costs against the pre-facelift 2024 Turbo 2WD from $36,490, before on-road costs, the price rises aren’t nearly as bad as they seem (though runout ’24-build models are currently being promoted at $34,590, drive-away).

So, what else does your $40K-plus Vitara Turbo Hybrid give you?

Not much compared to most of the competition listed earlier. Climate control, rear privacy glass, LED automatic headlights, cloth upholstery, adaptive cruise control, a 7.0-inch touchscreen, reversing camera, 17-inch alloy wheels and flat paint are bare minimum at this price point.

Metallic paint demands another $745 if the standard white isn’t your bag.

Stretching to the $45,990 AWD adds a panoramic sunroof, 9.0-inch touchscreen, six instead of four speakers, extra driving modes, synthetic leather trim and two extra modish colours – beige or grey-blue that are also available with a two-tone black combo for an extra $1345.

The Vitara is over a decade old, but costs new-model money, lacks features found in rivals costing thousands less and only allows for a five-year warranty when some others offer up to 10.

Obama was US President when this Suzuki launched. The world it finds itself in today seems almost unrecognisable.

The Ioniq 5 Epiq AWD is powered by a permanent magnet synchronous electric motor on each axle, both powerful, but the rear unit packs a bigger punch.

And combined peak outputs of 239kW and 605Nm are substantial with especially the latter delivering eye-widening acceleration.

Drive goes to all four wheels via a single-speed, reduction gear auto transmission on both axles. And a ‘Disconnector Actuator System’ is able to disengage the front wheels to reduce drag losses from the front motor and improve energy efficiency.

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

The Ioniq 5 Epiq AWD is powered by an 84kWh liquid-cooled lithium-ion battery, borrowed from the high-performance Ioniq 5 N.

Thanks to 800-volt compatibility it can accept a 350kW DC charge which translates to an up to 80 per cent charge time of around 18 minutes, which expands to just over an hour using a more typical 50kW charger.

Connect to AC at the Ioniq 5’s maximum 10.5kW capacity and quoted charge time is just over six hours.

Official energy consumption on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle is 19kWh/100km and claimed range is a useful 495km.

Over a mix of urban, suburban and freeway running on test we saw a real-world average of 16.8kWh/100km, which is impressive for a car with this much performance potential.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

In terms of straight line performance we’re talking 0-100km/h in a tick over 5.0 seconds and I see anything in the five-second bracket as properly quick.

With more than 600Nm of peak pulling power at your disposal there’s always plenty of pulling power for efficient in-traffic moves and safe highway overtaking.

The shift-by-wire gear selector on the steering column takes some getting used to but once you’re in tune with it, it’s surprisingly convenient, especially during slow speed parking or turning manoeuvres. 

There are multiple modes - ‘Eco’, ‘Normal’, ‘Sport’ and ‘Snow’. Sport mode spices things up a bit with more urgent responses and the ‘HTrac’ AWD system uses multiple sensors to manage potential wheelspin and optimise drive in wet conditions or on loose dirt surfaces.

Suspension is by struts at the front and multi-links and the rear and the Ioniq 5 in this configuration is ultra-smooth and comfortable.

Even hitting pretty aggressive speed bumps and ruts in the road and the car soaks them up without fuss. You’re used to EVs being a little harsh in terms of ride compliance thanks to their relative weight, but that’s not the case here.

As part of a model upgrade introduced earlier this year Hyundai says it undertook a “comprehensive revision to the suspension tune”, which includes high-performance dampers on this N Line. And despite low-ish profile (255/45) Michelin Pilot Sport EV tyres on the 20-inch rims it remains comfortable and quiet.

The upgrade also included body reinforcements in the B- and C-pillar, door surrounds and under the body for a stiffer platform overall.

That pays off in the dynamics. Despite its 2.1-tonne weight the Ioniq 5’s steering is accurate and nicely weighted. It doesn’t feel lumbering or ponderous despite its relative heft.

The physical brakes are ventilated discs front and rear with regenerative available through four levels, the most aggressive setting being ‘i-Pedal’ which allows single-pedal driving.

It will slow the car to a full stop, harvesting the most energy possible in the process, although you might need a dab on the brake pedal if things are tight.

Miscellaneous observations include a 12m turning circle, so be ready for three-point turns where you didn’t think you’d have to.

Hyundai's (and Kia’s) default over-speed warning is present in full-force taking clicks through multiple screens to switch off and avoid its incessant audible alarm saying you've exceed what the car believes is the posted limit (every time you restart the car).

The recently released Tucson Hybrid features a short-cut function to do away with this issue and it would be welcome here.

The CPU underpinning the multimedia system is more powerful and response is speedy without a hint of lag.

And the camera based ‘mirrors’ take some getting used to. For many, they’re the answer to a question no one was asking. I mean, conventional mirrors work pretty well and any aero benefit from the smaller camera units has to be modest. But once you’re in tune with them the hi-def screens are excellent.

A flip of the switch on the interior rear view mirror allows you to side-step tall heads or loads in the back of the car but minimal depth of field is also (visually) awkward at first.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

Back in 2015, the Vitara scored a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test rating, but it hasn’t been tested since and that result expired in December, 2022.

Both models come with the expected level of ADAS tech, including AEB, RCTA, lane departure warning, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitor, traffic sign recognition, auto high beam and adaptive cruise control.

There is no data on the operation parameters of the latest AEB system, but previous models operated from above 30km/h while the RCTA functions from 8.0km/h.

Six airbags (dual front, side and curtain) are also featured, along with two outboard rear-seat ISOFIX points and a trio of top tethers for child seats.

Hyundai covers the Ioniq 5 with a five-year/unlimited-km warranty, which is the mainstream market norm, with a separate eight-year/160,000km warranty for the drive battery; also an expected term.

Roadside assistance and sat-nav updates are renewed annually if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised Hyundai dealer.

Service interval is two years/30,000km which is appropriate for an EV given its relative mechanical simplicity and a ‘Lifetime Service Plan’ locks in scheduled maintenance costs for the life of the vehicle.

Service cost for the first five years is $1220, with each of the two services required in that time coming in at $610. Competitive for an EV in this part of the market.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.