Honda CR-V vs Kia Stonic

What's the difference?

The Honda CR-V RS hybrid has plenty going for it. It’s a well-rounded package with good levels of comfort and practicality, and a driving experience that’s easy to live with day to day.

There are a few areas that hold it back from leading the segment. The multimedia system feels behind the curve for a flagship grade, and the engine can become vocal under load. Some rivals also edge ahead when it comes to outright equipment.

Even so, the CR-V still delivers where it counts. It’s efficient, spacious and comfortable.

Unlike a lot of rivals in this segment, the Stonic's actually quite a bit of fun to drive, and that alone earns it a tick from me.

Yes, it can feel underpowered in places, especially when you're trying to do high-speed overtakes or if you're on a really engaging road and on and off the accelerator. But just cruising around, the little powertrain gives you plenty to get around the city.

And I guess that is the point. This does feel like a very city-friendly vehicle, even if it is undeniably showing its age in places.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with meals provided.

Note: The author, Andrew Chesterton, is a co-owner of Smart As Media, a content agency and media distribution service with a number automotive brands among its clients. When producing content for CarsGuide, he does so in accordance with the CarsGuide Editorial Guidelines and Code of Ethics (https://www.carsguide.com.au/ethics), and the views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.

The CR-V hasn’t changed much since this generation launched in 2023, but it remains a purposeful-looking SUV for the segment. A slightly longer body and 198mm of ground clearance give it a bit more presence on the road than some of its rivals.

The silhouette is clean and confident, lifted by black 19-inch alloy wheels, matching door handles and a sharply styled honeycomb grille.

Inside, the cabin reflects the RS grade nicely. The embossed leather seats with red contrast stitching add a sporty edge, while the dashboard design feels cohesive and well thought out. The honeycomb air vents tie in nicely with the grille and look modern. There's a satisfying tactility throughout, with plenty of soft-touch materials and clicky buttons. The panoramic sunroof and black headliner also give a subtle sense of sophistication.

As far as flagship grades go, it looks the part.

I'm not gonna spend too much time on the exterior design, because from most angles it largely looks a lot like a Kia Stonic, right? The big exterior change occurred up front, where the old Kia 'face' was retired, and replaced with an LED-trimmed front-end more in keeping with modern Kia models.

It is a tale of good and bad in the cabin of the Stonic. The good is the fact that it all feels very familiar and very Kia, which isn't a bad thing.

Th bad is some of the door materials aren't just cheap and hard plastic, but they feel a bit flimsy in places as well. Same with the centre console plastics. There are some elements where you could definitely lift up the ambience in the interior.

Up front, there’s plenty of space and the seats are comfortable over longer drives, helped by the extra adjustment and functions on offer. The seat bases are on the shorter side though, so I would have liked to see extendable under-thigh support for added comfort.

Storage is well thought out, making it easy to keep things tidy. There’s a deep centre console, two cupholders and decent door bins, along with a large tray that houses the wireless charging pad and two USB-C ports.

In the back, legroom is generous and the seats themselves are comfortable, especially with the heat function on the outboard seats. The transmission tunnel is also not too high for middle seaters. Headroom is a touch tighter, due to the panoramic sunroof, but it’s not a dealbreaker. The wide-opening rear doors also make access easy.

Features in the backseat are a little more modest than expected for a flagship. You get directional air vents and a couple of USB-C ports, but miss out on extras like separate climate controls and device pockets. There are two ISOFIX points and three top-tether anchors, though realistically two child seats will fit best.

Around the back, the 581L boot capacity means it easily handled luggage for four adults along with a weekend shop. This grade also includes a powered tailgate, though it makes do with a tyre repair kit rather than a spare, which won't suit everyone.

From the driver’s seat, the tech experience is a bit of a mixed bag. The multimedia system feels dated, both in size and graphics, and some settings can be fiddly to locate and adjust, including the head-up display. Wireless Apple CarPlay is a welcome inclusion, though it did take a few attempts to connect initially. Once paired, it’s been reliable.

On the plus side, Honda has kept physical buttons and dials for key functions, which makes a big difference to everyday usability. Very little is buried in menus, and it all feels intuitive to operate on the move.

In the GT-Line trim, you get the twin screen setup, which looks sharp, and I do like Kia's multi-function control bar, which takes care of things like navigation and media on the one digital screen.

It really is feeling a little bit old school in places. There's no wireless phone mirroring, for example, so you need to plug in. And even then you need to plug in with a USB-A rather than a USB-C, despite having both plugs at your disposal.

The other thing is that the GT-Line is almost $36k before on-road costs. And there are places where it just doesn't feel like that much money.

It's a case of what you see is what you get in the back seat of the Stonic. And what you see is... not that much.

There are two USB-C ports in the more expensive trims. There are bottle holders in each of the doors, but no cup holders, and no pull-down seat divider. It is a fairly sparse back seat experience.

What you do get, however, is the luxury of space. Sitting behind my own 175cm driving position, I had absolutely no problem with knee room and no problem with head room. In fact, even as an almost full-size adult, I reckon I could sit back there pretty comfortably, even on longer road trips.

The big news is the addition of a 48-volt mild hybrid system, and that 48-volt battery is under the boot floor. But because it's hidden under a flat partition, it actually doesn't impact boot space.

Kia is still claiming 352 litres with the rear seats in place and 1155 litres with the rear seats folded flat. You do, however, miss out on some under-boot storage. And there's no spare wheel to speak of, just a tyre repair kit.

You can have your Stonic in three flavours, the S, Sport and GT-Line, with retail pricing stepping from $28,180, to $32,290, to the range-topping $35,740 respectively.

The S is pretty basic in terms of kit, riding on 16-inch alloys, nabbing LED lights and daytime running lights, cloth seats, manual air-con and a six-speaker stereo. Tech comes via an 8.0-inch central screen with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto (but make sure you pack a USB-A cable to make it work, which feels very old school), as well as a 4.2-inch driver display and a smart key with push-button start.

The Sport packs in plenty more. Your alloys are now 17 inches, you get LED front fog lights, and your cloth seats now have synthetic leather trim. You also get centre console storage, single-zone climate control, a better feeling steering wheel and shifter, and rain-sensing wipers. You also get a bigger 12.0-inch central screen, extra USB-C ports and access to the Kia Connect app and over-the-air updates.

Finally, the GT-Line rides on a unique 17-inch alloy wheel design, and nabs a sunroof, heated front seats, a heated steering wheel and ambient interior lighting. It gets the full Kia twin-screen treatment, with two 12.3-inch displays handling infotainment and driving data, and you get a wireless charger.

The CR-V RS hybrid is all-wheel drive and pairs a 2.0-litre four-cylinder Atkinson-cycle engine with two electric motors, delivering up to 135kW and 355Nm. Both figures are a bit lower than its Kia and Hyundai rivals, which both produce up to 173kW/367Nm, but for the most part, there’s enough punch for both city driving and longer highway runs.

The electronic continuously variable transmission (e-CVT) can get a bit vocal under load though, particularly on hills where it tends to hold higher revs.

All Stonics get the same powertrain. A clever three-cylinder, 1.0-litre turbocharged petrol engine with 48-volt mild hybrid assistance. That means 88kW and 172Nm (up from 74kW). It has a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission.

We don’t have an official zero-to-100km/h time, but I’m estimating in excess of 10 seconds.

The CR-V hybrid has a claimed combined fuel consumption of 5.7L/100km. Paired with a 57-litre fuel tank, that gives it a theoretical driving range of around 1000km, which is strong for a mid-size SUV.

In the real world, I saw 6.7L/100km over the week. That’s still a solid result, especially considering how much highway driving was involved, where hybrids typically aren’t at their most efficient.

The 48-volt system helps drop both fuel use and C02 emissions, with the Stonic pegged at 5.0L/100kms on the combined cycle and 116g/km for emissions, both of which are lower numbers than the last model.

The Stonic’s 45-litre tank could theoretically deliver a circa-900km driving range.

On the road, the RS hybrid has enough power to keep things moving, even on winding hills, though you do need to lean into the throttle to get the most out of it. The engine can sound quite strained under load, but it’s more noise than anything, with performance still holding up.

Through corners, it feels more dynamic than you might expect. The suspension and steering lean firm and responsive, which makes it a capable tourer. That said, road noise does creep into the cabin, particularly on longer drives, and takes a bit of the shine off.

To maximise energy recovery, you can switch from Drive to B mode to increase regenerative braking. It’s especially useful in stop-start traffic or on hilly roads, though it does mean you can’t use cruise control in this setting.

Around town, visibility and parking are made easier with a 360-degree camera. The image is clear, although the slight fish-eye effect takes a little getting used to. Once you’re familiar with it, though, it’s a straightforward car to manoeuvre.

It is a really interesting drive proposition, this Stonic.

First and foremost, it does feel really well sorted in places. The steering has a nice weight to it. It's nice and direct. The ride is comfortable. It can get a little bit crashy over the harsher bumps, which actually isn't all that common in Kia products – like if you hit a cat's eye at speed, for example, you can definitely feel it in the cabin – but generally it's an engaged and comfortable drive.

Similarly, going around corners, even at speed, there's not a huge amount of body roll. The tires grip up pretty well, and it's really not a bad thing to throw around corners.

Where it gets interesting, though, is in its power delivery. At city speeds, so 50 or 60km/h, it's nice and easy and quiet. If you're gentle with the accelerator, and patient, it accrues speed in quite a calm, considered manner, without feeling overly sluggish.

Where it does start to fall apart a little bit, which is when you're at speed, say on a freeway for example, and you pull out to overtake and really plant your foot, and find there's really not a lot there. It can mean overtaking takes a lot longer than you might think. 

If you're on a really challenging road and you're kind of on the gas, on the brakes, on the gas and on the brakes, it can feel a little bit wheezy and uncertain, too, which is no doubt a byproduct of that relatively tiny powertrain.

We're definitely not talking rocket ship acceleration, and nor is it all that quiet in the cabin when you really start to wring its neck, which you will do occasionally.

But I think I've really stepped away from what this vehicle is supposed to be and what it's supposed to do. If you are easy with the accelerator, it can be a really calm, quiet cabin experience. And if you do find yourself on a twisting road, it actually sits and grips better than you might be thinking as well.

But there is no doubt the Stonic shines brightest in the city.

There’s no immediate plan to crash test the new Stonic, meaning its five-star rating has now expired.

All models get things like lane keeping assist with lane follow assist, and blind spot collision avoidance and front and rear parking sensors. The S also gets auto emergency braking (AEB) with car, pedestrian and cyclist avoidance, but the Sport and GT-Line both add junction turning to the system.

The CR-V is covered by Honda’s five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is below average now for the segment. However, it can be extended by a further three years if you service exclusively through Honda.

Ownership costs are where it stands out positively. You get five years of complimentary roadside assistance, along with a capped-price servicing program where visits are just $199 each. That’s one of the more affordable offerings in this class. For context, the Toyota RAV4 comes in at $325 per service over the same period, followed by $458 for the Hyundai Tucson and $583 for the Kia Sportage.

Service intervals are set at every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever comes first.

The Stonic is covered by Kia’s seven-year unlimited-kilometre warranty, with capped-price servicing covering the warranty term.

Servicing is required every 12 months or 10,000kms, and all seven services will set you back $3780 combined.