Ford E-Transit vs Gac Aion Ut

What's the difference?

Wow. This is state-of-the-art EV van engineering – complete with sporty handling and an excellent ride – yet it maintains all the usual Transit attributes.

The Tesla of electric vans? Maybe.

The only thing remains is pricing and how the E-Transit Custom behaves and drives on Australian roads… and we’ll have the answer to those by the end of this year.

But as it stands, Ford's European mid-sized van is keeping the innovative spirit of the original alive.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The Aion UT is a cleverly-specified little hatchback and a great entry-point into electric motoring. The software needs a bit of work from a usability perspective, plus the spongy ride and cutesy styling might not be for everyone. 

However, with strong points including driving range, cabin space and value, there’s even a pitch for it in some cases to be an only car compared to most of its price rivals, which are more likely to be thought of as a second car runabout in a two-car garage.

The pick of the range is definitely the entry-level Premium. It comes in at a headline-grabbing price with specs to blow rivals out of the water, while only missing out on a few luxuries.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

It may look like the old Transit Custom but the new one has been completely redesigned and rides on an all-new platform.

It’s more aero efficient and the wheelbase has been stretched with the front wheels pulled forward to liberate more leg and foot room.

The roof remains under 2.1-metres high for easier car park clearance, but there’s more space inside due to a lower floor that’s aided by new side steps. This, along with wider side apertures, make for easier loading and unloading.

The E-Transit’s traction battery is integrated into the lower-floor structure, adding significant rigidity as well as a lower centre of gravity, benefitting dynamics and control, as does the switch to an independent rear suspension set-up that conversely improves packaging.

Key cargo-capacity facts are: 3450mm (maximum load length), 6.8 cubic metres (Standard Roof load volume), 9.0 cubic metres (High Roof load volume, up to 1011kg (payload), 3225kg (Gross Vehicle Mass) and 2300kg (maximum braked towing capacity).

More info pertaining to the Australian-market E-Transit Custom will be revealed later in 2024.

GAC tells us the UT hatch was designed in Milan, Italy, but it also isn’t ashamed of the Chinese influence on its overall appearance, like the ultra-short bonnet and Chinese city-car style face.

Along the side it has a modern, aerodynamic profile, and the ultra-short overhangs and long wheelbase maximise the amount of room for batteries under the floor and interior space.

The rear feels a lot like a modern Mini, with its bulbous tailgate and protruding light clusters, spiced up with a sporty spoiler piece jutting out.

It’s not a bad looking thing and it’s available in an array of fun colours.

On the inside it seems to follow the established rule-book of Chinese automakers, with plush trims, big screens with minimal physical buttons as well as a contemporary two-spoke steering wheel.

There’s a trendy floating console which hosts the cupholders and wireless charger on the Luxury grade, and an array of interesting patterns and textures through the doors and dash which you wouldn’t have once seen on a car at this price-point.

However, it is worth noting that while the seats are quite nice, and the steering wheel is a stand-out touchpoint, the trims on the doors and across the dash-top are hard plastics, more so than some of this car’s rivals.

It isn’t just parcels and packages that benefit from all the engineering advances made in the new-gen Transit Custom.

Big doors open to a new, lower and larger cabin. With the front wheels pushed forward, it’s flatter, with more space for three-abreast seating. And, now, the driver enjoys better cross-cabin access right to the opposite door with fewer obstacles.

To aid entry and egress due to its flat base, the E-Transit Custom scores a “squircle” (squarish) steering wheel. It’s one of the few visual distinctions in an otherwise fairly mundane, though well-made, interior. Material quality is of the hardy but pleasant variety.

Our test van was the optional Sport model as-yet not confirmed for the EV (though it’s coming for the diesel), with darker hues, upholstery stripes and a few more luxury features.

Australian-bound E-Transit Customs will be closer to the European Trend spec, which we factored in strongly when assessing the electrified newcomer.

Both grades sampled included Ford’s optional ‘Mobile Office’ that will be made available in Australia. Among other things, it provides a three-position wheel, from the regular position to roughly 45- and 90-degree angles.

The thinking here is for drivers to respectively either rest a laptop or have an in-situ table – complete with a squircle-shaped tray – tilt all the way forward for meal times. A lockout device prevents vehicle operation in anything but the home position.

Handy, though note that two of the three vans we drove with this feature had a rattly wheel in the normal driving position. Ford promises a fix for production is coming.

Other Mobile Office additions include various mounting points for accessories.

The driving position is 4WD-high, with the vast windscreen and very deep side windows providing panoramic views. Because of the rear bulkhead behind the seats, a camera-fied rear-vision mirror, along with the sizeable exterior mirrors, provide sufficient side/rear vision.

The driver’s seat is supportive and comfy if not that shapely, and it seems more fully padded than the flimsy cushions of the (narrower) centre and passenger seats.

The latter both hinge forward to reveal a massive storage cavity (ideal for charging cables) as well as the load-through hatch as per the previous-gen Transit where fitted.

Speaking of storage, Ford’s engineers have repositioned the passenger front airbag from its traditional dashtop home to above the windscreen header, liberating a second glove box fit for housing laptops.

The dashboard’s 13-inch touchscreen is perfectly sized and driver-angled. It uses Ford’s excellent SYNC 4 multimedia system, is powered by a 5G modem for OTA software updates for around 30 modules, and is functional, fast and intuitive. It also comes with Alexa voice commands.

Ample ventilation, big grab handles, massive door pockets for bottles, additional storage areas including behind the configurable digital instrumentation pod, several cupholders, USB-A and -C outlets near shelving areas for minimal cable entanglements, plenty of LED light sources and an armrest/tray, highlight Ford’s many decades of experience building mid-sized vans.

On the launch drive's smooth German roads, wind and road noise intrusion were impressively subdued for a van (especially so given the quiet e-motor operation compared to the clatter of a diesel), though the large frontal area means at speed you won’t mistake this for a luxury EV.

Still, being roomy yet cosy, practical yet thoughtfully presented and solidly built without feeling cheap, the E-Transit Custom's cabin is right on the money – a secure and inviting workhorse first and foremost.

Keep in mind, too, that the cargo area will likely include Ford’s 'Load Area Protection Kit', bringing a moulded load floor liner and protection for the sides and rear doors. Because, this is a workhorse, after all.

In terms of interior space, the Aion UT stands out with its spacious cabin. At 182cm tall, I am easily able to find a comfortable seating position, and visibility out the front sides and rear, while not as good as some small SUVs, isn’t bad.

There’s lots of headroom, and while I mentioned the hard plastic door cards before, there’s enough padding everywhere your elbows are going to touch to make it feel a bit nicer than perhaps it is.

The main drawback of this car for me is the lack of tactile buttons and the frustrating software.

The main screen isn’t particularly well utilised, being taken up by either a background or the navigation map, with an array of typically small shortcuts across the bottom for important features like the climate control or settings menus.

You can pre-set a few information panels which sit above the shortcut bar as in many rival cars and there’s also a shortcut tray which can be hosted on the driver’s side and configured with a variety of shortcuts and settings.

It’s just a bit clumsy to use, and the array of poorly-labelled settings menus for things like active safety equipment feel needlessly complicated.

I’d love to see this car with physical controls for climate and multimedia to make it easier to live with.

Up front the storage is decent. There are big pockets in the doors and a large storage tray between the driver and front passenger thanks to a flat floor. There’s also a slightly weird storage box under the touchscreen which has a net inside, good for more delicate objects you don’t want flying around the cabin.

On the floating console there are two cupholders which are a bit too shallow for my liking, and the wireless charger feels almost pointless because its made of a hard plastic, so your phone just slides right off in the corners. The cabled outlets are hidden beneath which allows for tidy cable management and the centre armrest console box is a healthy size.

The rear seat is comparatively basic, although touches on the key points. Its main advantage is how generous the space is. My frame was able to fit behind my own driving position with heaps of room for my knees, and just enough room for my head despite the dip in the roof for the sunroof shade in the Luxury-grade car we tested. There may be even more headroom in the base car.

The flat floor makes the space useful even for three across in a pinch and there’s a drop-down armrest with (again, shallow) cupholders. There are pockets on the back of both front seats and smallish pockets in each door. The array of soft trims continues, too, and the back of the centre console features a partially adjustable air vent. Luxury spec cars get a single USB rear power outlet.

As with many Chinese cars in this segment, the generous rear seat space comes at a cost to the boot. It measures just 321 litres, which is slightly smaller than its main opponents in this category, although larger than some hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla, for example.

It has its advantages, though. The floor is two-tiered, and can offer a flat load area with the rear seats folded down, or a deeper boot in its lower position. Underneath there’s a cutaway good for charging equipment and the tyre repair kit (sorry, no spare wheel in here).

Unlike some EVs, the Aion UT doesn’t get a frunk (front boot) for additional storage.

The GAC Aion UT starts from $31,990, before on-road costs, for the entry-level Premium grade, which makes it the third-most affordable EV you can buy in Australia after the city-sized BYD Atto 1 and the entry-level version of the BYD Dolphin.

It sits closer to price-parity with the GWM Ora, but is significantly more affordable than the rear-drive MG4 and more spec-competitive top-grade BYD Dolphin.

The bigger threat to the Aion UT is that a lot of buyers will be willing to spend slightly more to get into one of the most affordable electric small SUVs, like the BYD Atto 2 or Jaecoo J5.

Still, GAC makes a solid pitch for its hatch, which offers a higher spec level than its most direct price rivals.

For example, the Aion UT is more powerful than the entry-level Dolphin and Ora while offering a higher level of interior equipment. 

Even the just-arrived front-drive MG4 Urban also starts at $31,990, but that’s for a version with significantly less driving range.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say the entry-level version of the Aion UT (the confusingly-named Premium) is probably the pick of the two variant range.

Standard equipment levels on this car include 17-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting all around, synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen with online connectivity and built-in nav as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also an 8.88-inch digital instrument cluster, heated steering wheel and the full array of safety kit.

With the same power and battery size, this leaves only arguably unnecessary luxuries for the Luxury grade, like a wireless phone charger, ventilated driver’s seat, auto dimming rear vision mirror with auto power folding wing mirrors, a powered tailgate and of course, a panoramic sunroof (with shade!).

Mated to a large battery pack sharing tech with the Ford F-150 Lightning truck, the E-Transit Custom's single, front-mounted electric motor delivers 160kW of power and 415Nm of torque to the rear wheels via a single-speed auto.

As usual, 'Eco', 'Normal' and 'Sport' modes are included to suit the driver’s mood.

One of the reasons Australia won't bother with the 100kW version is its electronically-limited 117km/h top speed; the 160kW can manage all of 133km/h.

Keeping all that performance in check are a strut/leaf spring arrangement up front and a semi-trailing arm independent rear suspension borrowed from its larger sibling.

Full technical specifications will be revealed closer to the E-Transit Custom’s local launch at the end of this year.

The Aion UT has a front-mounted electric motor producing 150kW/210Nm. That’s plenty punchy for any hatchback at this price, and I like the way the brand hasn’t messed around with a sub-100kW motor in the base variant to push prospects towards the top-spec car.

It’s more powerful than all of its closest rivals and at the time of writing you’ll have to spend four to six thousand dollars more to get into something equivalent from BYD, Chery, Jaecoo, Leapmotor or MG.

It even has a claimed 0-100km/h sprint time as low as 7.3 seconds.

Ford's official energy consumption figure for the E-Transit Custom is 21.8kWh/100km and the trip computer in our Sport grade test vehicle read 21.6kWh/100km, which is about on the money for this size of van.

With the 64kWh Nickel Cobalt Manganese battery pack that’s 'shrink-wrapped' low down under the load area to help achieve that low floor, the WLTP range figure is 308km for the 160kW (and 337km for the 100kW E-Transit Custom Australia is likely to miss out on).

Ford reckons these numbers are roughly four times the average-daily mileage for van drivers in Europe.

Brake-by-wire regenerative-braking tech allows for one-pedal braking, which in turn helps recharge the battery pack. If you lash out for a big 11kW Wallbox accessory, the standard 11kW AC on-board charge allows a full overnight top-up.

As the E-Transit has a 124kW DC fast-charge capacity, a high-capacity station can replenish the battery from 10-80 per cent full in under 45 minutes.

The Aion UT has a 60kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack, which grants it a WLTP-certified 430km of driving range.

That’s more than its closest rivals, like the entry-level Ora Standard Range (310km), BYD Dolphin Essential (410km) or BYD Atto 2 (345km).

Claimed efficiency is 16.4kWh/100km and the car I tested returned a consumption of 14.0kWh/100km over a 130km route of mixed conditions, which isn’t bad at all.

Charging speeds are less impressive, but realistically appropriate for the relatively small battery. The peak DC charging capacity of 87kW means a charge time which the brand quotes at 24 minutes, but this is from 30-80 per cent. Expect closer to 40 minutes for a 10-80 per cent charge.

AC charging is decent, at 11kW. This should have you charging from 10-80 per cent between four and five hours.

For every one of its four generations since 1965, the Transit has set the pace for driveability, as if Ford of Europe was determined to stamp its dynamic authority in the commercial vehicle space.

The original broke the van mould by being far more car-like than any that came before, offering the availability of a powerful engine, responsive steering and safe handling.

That the E-Transit Custom maintains the philosophy is no surprise; that it ended up being so fresh and rewarding to drive – albeit on German roads carefully chosen by Ford – should be a warning for rivals to raise their standards.

Let’s start with the lofty yet cocooning driver environment, which immediately sets you at ease and in the mood. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable to report here.

Shift the natty little column wand into D, and the instant throttle response of a good EV seems slightly too good to be true in what is a boxy workhorse. Acceleration is urgent yet smooth, humming away as the speed builds in a big yet measured way.

That’s all good and well, but given the sheer mass of this mid-sized van, the second big test is how measured and controlled the handling is, especially at speed.

Again, there’s ample feel from the squircle wheel, as the E-Transit tips crisply into corners, glides through fast curves and generally maintains its composure when turning up the pace.

Credit, no doubt, to the new trailing link independent rear suspension system, which must take a lot of the credit in making the Ford van handle so confidently.

It also does a great job absorbing bumps and isolating the occupants from the road surface underneath.

We tried the standard Trend-spec 15-inch wheeled version, as well as the 17-inch Sport version, which does have a slightly firmer edge, but then seems ever keener through corners.

One of the E-Transit Custom’s true achievements is that – with no diesel engine to drown other noises out – the lack of wind, road and tyre noise intrusion is just so relaxing. Its refinement and ability to combat fatigue augers well for EV van drivers of the future.

Again, keep in mind that we’re on slick Euro roads in specially-prepared launch vehicles, equipped with ballast in the back to emulate a load (and hunker down the rear).

Ultimately, the true test will come when behind the wheel of the E-Transit in Australia. But, our first drive revealed what is surely the most modern and enjoyable van we’ve yet to experience: fast, fun, secure and comfortable.

The drive experience can be where a lot of Chinese cars fall down but I walked away less frustrated by the Aion UT.

That’s not to say it will behave as you might expect a low-slung hatchback to. The suspension, for example, is extremely soft as it maintains its original Chinese-market state-of-tune.

This makes the car waft over imperfections on city roads. And in that sense it offers supreme ride comfort in the scenarios it was designed for. However, at the extremes, like some speed bumps, or particularly deep pot holes there can be a surprisingly violent re-bound sending a thud through the cabin.

The other trade-off for soft suspension is less body control. I was surprised to find that the Aion UT holds it together mostly well on a flat country B-road, but when undulations and big dips introduce themselves, the soft suspension can be too slow to react, making the car lose confidence in higher-speed open road scenarios we’re more used to in Australia.

The steering, like many electric cars in this category, is relatively heavily electrically assisted. This makes it light and easy to adjust at low speeds for easy park and maneuverability in the confines of a city. It loses a little bit of road-feel at higher speeds but the Aion UT’s steering is far from the least connected I’ve experienced recently.

One thing it can’t be criticised for is a lack of power. With 150kW instantaneously available the Aion UT has some serious poke and while the ChaoYang tyre package is tuned more for efficiency than grip, it’s again not one of the worst I’ve driven with.

One thing which helps the whole experience along is this car’s hatchback layout. With the weight of the battery low and squat and the wheels all the way out to the edges of the frame, the Aion UT inherently handles decently compared to an electric crossover or small SUV.

Like all Chinese cars, the UT has a host of occasionally frustrating driver aids, which you can read about in the Safety section below. While I was inclined to turn some of the features off after testing them, the alerts are relatively quiet and non-invasive.

Is the UT any good to drive? It’s not bad for the segment, I was largely pleased with how it handled and the power on offer, and while it still has its annoyances, they’re not big deal-breakers. 

The MG4 rear-drive is a better allrounder, while the GWM Ora isn’t as good. I’d say it’s on par with the BYD Dolphin, but they excel in different areas. The Dolphin's a bit sharper in terms of handling but the Aion UT is more comfortable.

As with many Chinese cars the list of active safety equipment is long but that doesn’t mean it’s particularly well calibrated.

Standard gear includes the key stuff like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. There are also rarer features for an affordable car like this including traffic sign recognition, door open warning, auto high beams and front cross-traffic alert.

On the parking front you get a 360-degree parking camera view as well as front and rear proximity sensors.

There's also an annoying driver monitoring system and one I haven’t seen much in the form of an occupant warning system, which seems to imagine you’re not wearing a seatbelt when you are.

It’s not the only safety system I found myself reaching to turn off. The lane keep assist could occasionally be a bit heavy-handed and the traffic sign alert was typically frustrating. This, sadly, is what we’ve come to expect from these types of systems from many Chinese automakers.

It’s not the most annoying system I’ve used, though, and the alerts are quiet enough and far enough apart that they aren't as intrusive as they can be in some rivals. You can also adjust the tolerance of some of the systems in the (needlessly complicated) menus to make them less annoying.

At the launch, the Aion UT was yet to be rated by ANCAP.

As with all Fords, a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty with (a conditional) seven years of roadside assistance is anticipated. All high-voltage components including the battery are subject to an eight-year/160,000km warranty.

With dramatically fewer moving parts, Ford reckons operating costs can be reduced by up to 40 per cent compared to the diesel-powered Transit Custom equivalent with service intervals likely to match its big EV bro’s at 12 months/30,000km.

The time-saving convenience this brings is one way Ford reckons helps to justify the circa-30 per cent premium the EV commands.

Note, though, that these figures are based on European data and may take in regional EV subsidies and incentives not available in Australia.

Expect capped-price servicing to be another incentive.

All that info and more will drop closer to the EV’s launch closer to the end of this year.

GAC covers this electric hatch with an eight-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the brand’s “magazine battery 2.0” is covered by a separate eight-year and 200,000km warranty. Five years of roadside assistance is included.

The Aion UT needs to be serviced once a year or 15,000km. The service price schedule extends all the way out to 240,000km with yearly visits costing between $199 and $640 but for the life of the warranty the average yearly cost comes in at $352.

There are currently 19 GAC dealers in Australia, confined mainly to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane with a single store in Perth and an outlier in Cairns. No representation yet in Tassie, Canberra, the Northern Territory or SA.