Aston Martin DBX vs Mercedes-Benz GLS-Class

What's the difference?

As with all Aston Martins the DBX is a seriously beautiful car with that high-end exotic but restrained exterior styling for which the brand is known. As with all Astons, too, the busy interior design may put some minimalism fans off and those high-placed shifting buttons pose a functionality problem.

As an SUV the DBX is spacious and practical. You could use this daily as a family car. I did and found it easy to adapt to.

The driving experience left me disappointed. I didn’t feel the same close connection with the DBX while driving that I have had with other super SUVs, such as the Lamborghini Urus and more affordable models offered by Porsche and Mercedes-AMG.

But then, you see those other cars everywhere, unlike the DBX which is a rare and beautiful creature, despite the flaws.

The GLS63 is an intimidating beast from afar, but it rewards its occupants in almost every way. Yep, there really isn’t a box it doesn’t tick without serious compromise, such is its breadth of capability.

If there was ever a Swiss Army Knife of cars, the GLS63 is definitely a contender for the title, one that makes it very hard to wipe the smile off your face. Just make sure you can fit it in your garage first…

I'm not one to name drop but I was having a chin wag with Marek, that's Marek Reichman, Aston Martin's Vice President and Chief Creative Officer, the fellow who has designed every Aston from the past 15 years, that Marek. Anyway, before the DBX came out he told me any SUV he designed would be unmistakably an Aston Martin.

I think he nailed it. The gaping Aston Martin grille is unmistakably the same as the DB11's and the tailgate, which although is the back hatch to a large SUV, is absolutely the same as the rear end of the Vantage.

Everything in between has all the family hallmarks. There are those oval headlights and the huge beak of a bonnet, the chiselled side panels with wheel arches that push up towards the sky and those rear haunches.

Not a fan of minimalist design? Then you'll love the DBX's cabin and its dashboard cluttered with dials, buttons, and switches.

It's like the cockpit of a plane and it's a very Aston Martin thing – just look at the layout of the DB5 from the 1960s, it's a mess, a beautiful mess though. The same goes for current models such as the DB11, DBS and Vantage.

Seriously, if there was one area where Marek may have decided not to make the DBX unmistakably Aston Martin, I wish it had been the interior.

Still, I think the DBX has the best cabin design of any current Aston, with its large media screen built into the centre console and more modern styling.

But regardless of what it looks like the feel of the materials is outstanding. There's a thick leather coating on just about every surface, apart from those which are solid, cold metal, like the paddle shifters and door handles.

It's a plush, sporty place, like Batman's suit only it smells a lot nicer.

The DBX is a large SUV at 5039mm long, 2220mm wide with the mirrors unfurled and 1680mm tall. Yep, this thing fills up an entire space in a car park.

The DBX comes in a choice of 53 colours. Yes, fifty three.  There's the 'Onyx Black' my test car wore, but also 'Royal Indigo', 'Supernova Red' and 'Kermit Green.'

If the GLS63 was a Marvel superhero, it would undoubtedly be the Hulk. Simply put, it has road presence like few others. In fact, it’s frankly menacing.

Of course, the GLS is already pretty intimidating due to its sheer size and blocky design, but the GLS63’s full-fat AMG treatment takes it to another level.

Naturally, the GLS63 gets an aggressive body kit, with its purposeful bumpers, side skirts and rear spoiler serving as instant reminders of what you’re dealing with, but it’s AMG’s signature Panamericana grille insert that really hammers home the point.

Around the side, the GLS63’s 22-inch alloy wheels with staggered tyres (front: 275/50, rear: 315/45) make their presence known, positioned below the wheelarch extensions.

That said, some fun’s also had at the rear end, where the GLS63’s diffuser element integrates the foreboding sports exhaust system with quad tailpipes very neatly.

The focused Multibeam LED headlights also look the part, while the opposing LED tail-lights tie everything together outside quite nicely.

Inside, the GLS63 stands out from the GLS crowd with its sports steering wheel with Dinamica microfibre accents, and multi-contour front seats, which are covered in Nappa leather alongside the armrests, dashboard and door shoulders and inserts.

Of note, the doors bins are unfortunately of the hard plastic variety, which is very disappointing in a vehicle that costs this much. You would expect that cow hide would also been applied to them, but alas it isn’t.

The GLS63’s black headliner serves as an obligatory reminder of its sporting intent, and while it makes for a dark cabin, metallic accents are prominent throughout, while the optional trim (our test vehicle had carbon-fibre) mixes things up, alongside the ambient lighting.

And let’s not forget the GLS63 is still loaded with plenty of cutting-edge technology, including a pair of 12.3-inch displays, with one the central touchscreen and the other the digital instrument cluster.

Both are powered by Mercedes’ class-leading MBUX multimedia system and feature Apple CarPlay and Android Auto support. This set-up arguably remains the best there is today thanks to its speed and breadth of functionality and input methods.

Until the DBX came along the most practical Aston Martin was the five-door, four-seater Rapide which had a huge rear hatch and a boot big enough to swallow an entire matching five-piece luggage set – I saw it with my very own eyes.

Now there's the DBX which seats five (well, four comfortably, because nobody wants to be in the middle) and has a boot with a luggage capacity of 491 litres under the leather cargo cover.

As you can see it fit our three-piece CarsGuide luggage set, and I also used it to pick up some compost – very likely the first time anybody has done this to a DBX ever in Australia, and probably the last.

Cabin storage is impressive. The floating centre console is suspended like a hammock and under it is a huge bunk for a phone, wallet, and small bags. The split-opening armrest houses a large box, too.

The door pockets are on the small side but there are two cupholders up front and another two in the fold-down armrest in the second row.

Talking of rows, there's no third row. The DBX comes as a two-row, five-seater only.

It’s a roomy second row, with more than enough space for me at 191cm (6'3") tall to sit behind my driving position and headroom is excellent, too.

Measuring 5243mm, 2030mm wide and 1782mm tall with a 3135mm wheelbase, the GLS63 is an upper-large SUV in every sense of the term, which means it’s also very practical.

For example, cargo capacity below the load cover is decent, at 355L, but stow the 50/50 power-split-folding third row via the boot and it’s very good, at 890L, or drop the 40/20/40 power-split-folding middle bench, too, and it becomes a cavernous 2400L.

Better yet, the boot’s aperture is almost square, and its floor’s flat, while there’s no load lip to contend with, making loading bulkier items even easier. Up to four tie-down points are also on hand (depending on seating configuration) to secure loose cargo.

Under the false floor is the space-saver spare, which is to be expected, but what isn’t expected necessarily is the fact there’s also enough room there for the cargo cover when it’s not in use, which would be the case if six or more passengers are regularly onboard.

Moving into the power-sliding second row, the GLS63’s practicality is once again brought to the fore, with up to six-plus inches of legroom available behind my 184cm driving position.

There’s also two inches of headroom with the panoramic sunroof in situ, not to mention just enough toe-room. The GLS63’s small transmission tunnel and sheer width also mean three adults can be seated on the middle bench with few complaints.

Amenities-wise, the second row has map pockets on the front-seat backrest and a small fold-down cubby below the rear climate controls, with it containing two slots for smartphones and a pair of strategically placed USB-C ports.

The rear door bins can take one large bottle each, while a fold-down central armrest is also on hand, featuring a shallow tray and retractable (and flimsy) cupholders.

Alternatively, the $2800 Rear Seat Comfort Package fitted to our test vehicle subs in a tablet that can control the multimedia system, a wireless smartphone charger and a small cubby into the former, as well as a heated/cooled cupholder atop the rear of the centre console.

In the third row, it’s not quite as roomy if you’re an adult. With the middle bench in its most accommodating position, my knees still brush up against its backrest, which is to be expected given it’s primarily designed for children. I also have an inch of headroom there.

Nonetheless, getting in and out of the third row is relatively easy as the power-operated middle bench tumbles forward and provides just enough space to make entry and exit somewhat graceful.

When seated, rear occupants are treated to two USB-C ports and one small cupholder each, so they’re arguably taken better care of than those in the middle.

Child seats are well and truly accommodated, with four ISOFIX and five top-tether anchorage points fitted across the second and third rows, although the latter will inevitably prove to be a much tighter fit.

The driver and front passenger are still taken care of, with a front cubby taken up by two heated/cooled cupholders, a wireless smartphone charger, two USB-C ports and a 12V power outlet, while their door bins take one large and one small bottle each.

In-cabin storage options include the large central storage bin, which hides another USB-C port, while the glovebox is on the smaller side, with about a third of it taken up by the fragrance, which is pumped into the cabin to ensure the interior always smells its best.

Priced from $255,700 plus on-road costs, the GLS63 commands a $34,329 premium over its predecessor, although buyers are arguably getting more bang for their buck than before, even if it does sit well clear of the two other GLS variants: the $147,100 GLS450 and $153,900 GLS400d.

Standard equipment not already mentioned in the GLS63 includes regular metallic paintwork (our test vehicle was finished in Selenite Grey), dusk-sensing lights, rain-sensing wipers, power-folding side mirrors with heating, soft-close doors, roof rails, rear privacy glass and a power-operated tailgate.

Inside, keyless entry and start, augmented reality (AR) satellite navigation with live traffic, digital radio, a 590W Burmester surround-sound system with 13 speakers, a head-up display, a panoramic sunroof, heated seats (including middle outboard) and armrests, cooled front seats with massaging functionality, power-adjustable seats, a power-adjustable steering column, temperature-controlled front cupholders, five-zone climate control, stainless-steel pedals and an auto-dimming rearview mirror feature.

With BMW not offering an X7 M (although the slightly smaller $209,900 X5 M Competition is available) and the $208,500 Audi RS Q8 really from the segment below, the GLS63 does not have a direct rival in the Upper-large SUV segment.

In fact, the $334,700 Bentley Bentayga V8 is actually the model that comes closest to the GLS63 when looking for a seven-seater with a similar level of bent-eight performance.

When it came to giving the DBX an engine Aston Martin chose the same 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 that's in the Vantage only they made it more powerful – 25kW more at 405kW (542hp). There's 15Nm more torque as well, at 700Nm.

Shifting through a nine-speed automatic transmission the DBX's 0-100km/h time is 4.5 seconds, which is almost a second slower than the Vantage's 3.6 seconds.

That said, the DBX weighs more than 2.2 tonnes, has a maximum ground clearance of 190mm, can wade rivers to a depth of 500mm and has a braked towing capacity of 2700kg. Oh yeah, and it's all-wheel drive.

That engine is one of the world's best V8s. It's light, compact, efficient and can produce enormous grunt. It's also made by Mercedes-Benz. Yup, it's the same (M177) 4.0-litre V8 found in the Mercedes-AMG C 63 S and a stack of other AMG-badged beasties.

There's just one thing, the V8 in the DBX doesn't sound as good to me as the one in a Mercedes-AMG. Aston's version has a less guttural and breathy exhaust note.

Sure, it still sounds amazing and when pushed hard it screams like Boudica charging into battle, but how often will you drive like that?

Most of the time we're in traffic in the suburbs and city trundling around at 40km/h. But even with the ‘loud’ exhaust mode set the note is still not as deep and brash as the AMG, which sounds delicious even at a standstill.

You probably already know why Aston Martin uses Mercedes-Benz engines. But just in case, it's because the brand with the star has been a part owner since 2013. Aston saves money and in return gets some of the best engines in the world.

The GLS63 is powered by a familiar 4.0-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine, with its version producing a thumping 450kW of power at 5750rpm and 850Nm of torque from 2250-5000rpm.

This unit is mated to a nine-speed torque-converter automatic transmission and AMG’s fully variable 4Matic+ all-wheel-drive system with torque vectoring and a rear limited-slip differential.

This set-up also features Mercedes’ EQ Boost 48V mild-hybrid system, which actually gives a 16kW/250Nm electric boost in short bursts, such as when accelerating off the line.

Speaking of which, the GLS63 sprints from a standstill to 100km/h in just 4.2 seconds, while its top speed is electronically limited to 250km/h.
 

In my fuel test of the DBX I took in open roads and city streets and measured 20.4L/100km at the pump.

On the same test loop the Urus I drove used 15.7L/100km and the Bentley Bentayga consumed 21.1L/100km.

It's not surprising these super SUVs are thirsty, but if you're spending all your time on city roads you can expect the consumption to be even higher.

What is surprising is Aston Martin thinking anyone could really get 12.2L/100km, but then all carmakers tend to claim overly ambitious fuel economy figures.

Just think, your next car after this will probably be electric, so enjoy the petrol while it lasts.

The GLS63’s fuel consumption on the combined-cycle test (ADR 81/02) is 13.0L per 100km, while its carbon dioxide emissions are 296 grams per km. All things considered, both claims are unsurprisingly high.

In our real-world testing, we averaged a fearsome 18.5L/100km over 65km of driving, split between highways and country roads, so not your usual mix. A very heavy right foot definitely influenced that result, but don’t expect to do too much better in a normal run.

For reference, the GLS63’s 90L fuel tank can be filled up with 98RON petrol at a minimum.

The DBX is a circa 550 horsepower giant that can reach out and almost touch 300km/h. But testing it on Sydney's roads is like having a champion racehorse in your backyard and your neighbour asking you what it's like to ride.

A racetrack wasn't handy at the time and I'd signed a form saying I'd not put any more than 400km on the clock during its stay with me, which meant having to choose my test loop carefully.

Fortunately, this was before Sydney was plunged into the current COVID lockdown, which makes that 400km now seem vast.

First, the DBX is an SUV anybody could drive, every day. Visibility is great and the ride is fine considering it rolls on 22-inch wheels and wears rubber as wide as some doorways and as thin as my socks (285/40 front and 325/35 rear Pirelli Scorpion Zero). Power delivery is smooth and predictable.

I did drive it every day, doing the shopping, school pick ups, a trip to the garden centre to fill it with plants and (ahem) compost, and it performed exactly as a large SUV should.

A source of frustration was the location of the shifting buttons high on the dashboard. Have a look at the images. Even with my chimpanzee-like long arms I had to stretch to change from Drive to Reverse. And with a not so small turning circle of 12.4m, three-point turns were a bit of an arm workout.

But the bigger frustration was the driver-car connection which didn't feel quite right. A good car-driver connection is essential for any great performance car.

Yes, there wasn't a race circuit where I could get to know the DBX quickly. But a good road, driven often with test cars, reveals a lot, too.

And the DBX didn't feel as good as the Lamborghini Urus, which is not only more comfortable but feels more dynamic and offers a superb connection between the driver and the machine.

The DBX is fast, it's powerful, the huge brakes pull it up quickly (almost violently so, if required) and handling is incredibly good.

It's just that I didn't really feel a part of it much at all. You know, the whole driver and car becoming one, thing. I felt like the third wheel on a date.

That connected feeling has been mastered by Porsche with its SUVs, but I feel the DBX needs more work. It felt unfinished.

I was told at the start that the DBX I was testing was a pre-production vehicle, but I'm sure that doesn't cover the shortcomings in the way it drove.

It's disappointing. I was hoping for better, but I think further development will see that come later.

Frankly, the GLS63 has absolutely no right being as capable as it is. It’s a really big bus that’s legitimately convinced it’s a sports car half its size.

Being a GLS variant, the GLS63 has independent suspension consisting of four-link front and multi-link rear axles with air springs and adaptive dampers, but its party trick is the addition of active anti-roll bars.

In what feels like magic, the GLS63 is simply not intimidated by corners, despite having massive dimensions and a considerable 2555kg (kerb weight) to deal with.

The active anti-roll bars make the GLS63 so much easier to drive fast through the twisty stuff, almost eliminating body roll, taking one key variable out of the equation for the driver. Active engine mounts are also fitted, helping to settle things even further.

The electric power steering on hand is also good. It is speed-sensitive and has a variable ratio, which basically makes the set-up more direct when it needs to be. It’s typically light in hand, too, until one of the sportier drive modes is engaged and extra heft is added.

So, handling is scarcely believable, which means the ride must be compromised, right? Yes and no. With the adaptive dampers in their softest setting, the GLS63 is very compliant. In fact, we’d say it feels luxurious when compared to other high-performance SUVs.

That said, our test vehicle was fitted with the optional 23-inch alloy wheels ($3900), which look the part but expose sharp edges and other road imperfections, not to mention generate noise easily heard inside. Naturally, feedback is exacerbated in the sportier drive modes.

Anyway, there’s more performance, and the GLS63 has the rest in spades. Its engine is a powerhouse in every sense of the word. It’s so powerful, in fact, that it hilariously hunkers down off the line or when suddenly accelerating at low speed.

Thanks to the mild-hybrid system, wads of torque is available from the get-go, making for a highly responsive driving experience, even in those rare moments when the engine isn’t on song.

While not as characterful as some of the other members in the 63 series, the GLS63 still makes some thoroughly entertaining noises, with its sports exhaust system popping like mad while on the overrun.

All of this ability is very well and good, but you need to be able to pull up quickly, and the high-performance braking package (400mm front and 370mm rear discs with six-piston fixed callipers and single-pot floating stoppers respectively) mercifully does exactly that.

Neither ANCAP nor its European counterpart, Euro NCAP, have awarded the GLS range a safety rating, but it’s fair to assume it would perform well in testing.

Advanced driver-assist systems in the GLS63 extend to autonomous emergency braking with pedestrian and cyclist detection, lane-keep and steering assist (including emergency), adaptive cruise control, active blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, traffic sign recognition, driver attention alert, high-beam assist, tyre pressure monitoring, hill-descent control, hill-start assist, park assist, surround-view cameras and front and rear parking sensors.

Other standard safety equipment includes nine airbags (dual front, front-side, curtain and rear-side plus driver’s knee), anti-skid brakes (ABS), electronic brake-force distribution (EBD) and the usual electronic stability and traction control systems. Yep, it doesn’t leave much to be desired on the safety front.

The DBX is covered by Aston Martin's three-year-unlimited kilometre warranty. Also included is roadside assistance.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 16,000km.

Aston Martin doesn't have have capped price servicing for the DBX nor can owners purchase a maintenance plan for the SUV.

We asked Aston Martin for an estimate of how much owners can expect to pay for servicing over the life of the warranty, but a spokesperson told us, "We are unable to provide an estimate on the cost of servicing over three years."

With Aston Martin unable or unwilling to give us any guidance on servicing costs, maybe there are recent model Aston owners out there who can. Let us know in the comments section below.

As with all Mercedes-AMG models, the GLS63 comes with a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which currently sets the standard for the premium market. It also comes with five years of roadside assistance.

The GLS63’s service intervals are relatively long, at every 12 months or 20,000km (whichever comes first). Better yet, it’s available with a five-year/100,000km capped-price servicing plan, but it costs $4450.