Urban Reviews

The first-generation Toyota C-HR was popular in Australia, however the second-generation model hasn’t yet lived up to its predecessor when it comes to sales.One of the main reasons is because the current C-HR, which launched in 2023, is considerably more expensive. This is primarily due to it being built in Turkiye, rather than Japan, which in turn attracts import tariffs.The 2026 Toyota C-HR line-up is currently priced as follows:C-HR GXL Hybrid: $46,940C-HR Koba Hybrid: $53,890C-HR GR Sport Hybrid: $58,890All prices are before on-road costsOn test here is the mid-spec Koba Hybrid with the optional two-tone paint and panoramic glass roof ($2700). This brings the as-tested price to $56,590, before on-road costs, or $62,107 drive-away in Victoria.This is a lot of money for a mid-spec, mainstream, small SUV. It’s considerably more expensive than the Hyundai Kona Hybrid, Honda HR-V Hybrid and even the larger and more practical Toyota Corolla Cross.At this price point it's even more expensive than the European Volkswagen T-Roc and is somewhat in line with the larger UK-sourced, hybrid-only Nissan Qashqai.Another reason why the current C-HR is more expensive is because it's hybrid only.In Koba form there is a 1.8-litre hybrid powertrain with a total system output of 103kW. This may sound mediocre, but around town there’s plenty of oomph.The majority of the low-speed driving is handled by the electric motor and it will occasionally dip into EV mode at highway and freeway speeds.Toyota claims the C-HR Koba consumes an average of 4.0L/100km, which is very low. Surprisingly, fuel figures like this are achievable in the real-world too. I saw as low as 3.7L/100km in the city and around 5.5L/100km on the freeway.There is a 43L fuel tank which allows for a theoretical total range of up to 1075km. A minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol is required.While the C-HR is zippy in urban areas, building up speed requires it to engage the petrol engine more. There is enough power to make do, but the engine sound above 80km/h is coarse and unrefined.It’s not helped by the road and tyre noise that enters the cabin at higher speeds. Given the price tag this is disappointing, but many European rivals also suffer the same issue.Even though the hybrid engine’s performance isn’t awe-inspiring, the way the C-HR drives is. It’s built on Toyota’s TNGA-C platform which it shares with the current Corolla and Prius, among others.This small SUV is nimble and fun to drive, even in your everyday commute. There’s an element of the driving experience that is similar to the go kart-feel of a Mini Cooper.Even the suspension is compliant, though the large 19-inch alloy wheels transmit harsher bumps into the cabin. Thankfully as the car is so small, you can typically dodge big potholes.Unlike many new-generation cars, this version of the C-HR is actually 30mm shorter than the original. However, it’s 37mm wider, allowing for more shoulder-to-shoulder passenger space.The exterior design looks sophisticated and upmarket for Toyota, however the flush door handles are a faff to use. Interestingly though, there’s no rear wiper, which is annoying.Inside there is a lovely cockpit feel with all the key touchpoints within easy reach of the driver. The front seats also have a sporty look and hug you in nicely.The second row clearly isn’t the main focus, but compared to the original C-HR it's not as claustrophobic. However, amenities are extremely limited. There’s only a single cupholder on each door. No rear air vents, no centre armrest.There is 388L of boot space with the rear seats upright, which doesn’t sound amazing on paper, but in practice it’s decent.The current Toyota C-HR Koba has a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on testing conducted in 2024.The following safety equipment is standard:10 airbagsAutonomous emergency braking (AEB)Blind-spot monitoringRear cross-traffic alertLane-keep assistAdaptive cruise controlDriver attention monitoringSurround-view cameraFront and rear parking sensorsSemi-autonomous parking assistThe C-HR is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, and the high-voltage battery is covered for eight years or 160,000km. Servicing at Toyota dealers also allows the driveline and battery warranty to be extended out to seven and 10 years, respectively.Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km. The first five services are capped at $275 each, which is competitive for the segment.

The Renault Symbioz is a new, small SUV from the French brand. We drove at its Aussie launch this year, but this is the first time we’ve lived with it for a week and I almost feel sorry for the thing.You see, the Symbioz was sparkling clean, fresh from being built in Valladolid, Spain before landing in the middle of a battlefield of Aussie suburbia with a four-year-old who immediately smudged chocolate in the seat and an 11-year old with more appointments and commitments than a prime minister.The Symbioz that I tested for family friendliness is the entry-grade Techno with the mild hybrid system.It was a long week. Here’s how it went...The Renault Symbioz model range is small in Australia consisting of only two grades. We tested the entry-level Techno mild hybrid, although you can get a full hybrid.The list price of the Symbioz Techno mild hybrid is $36,990 before on-road costs, which is a lot more expensive than some Chinese rivals like the Jaecoo J5 or a Chery Tiggo 4, and a smidge more than the Honda HR-V, Toyota Corolla Cross or Mazda CX-30. It is, however, more affordable than the hybrid-only Nissan Qashqai.The Symbioz Techno is worth the extra money even if the value isn’t as good as a Chinese SUV, because the difference is higher quality fit and finish and a more enjoyable car to drive.Standard features on the Techno include 18-inch alloy wheels, proximity unlocking, push-button start, a 10.4-inch media screen and 10.25-inch digital driver’s display, climate control, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, plus Google Automated services.The seats are a synthetic fabric and that means chocolate wipes straight off, thankfully.Our test car is fitted with the optional electronic glass roof which turns from transparent to opaque thanks to a dispersed polymer liquid crystal film between the sheets of glass. The beauty of this is that there's no need for a sunshade that could reduce head room. Check out my video here to see it work.Yes, while value isn’t one of the Renault Symbioz’s strengths it does have a lot of compelling attributes.Four attributes stand out as the strengths: the design, quality feel, practicality and the way it drives.I truly believe that the Symbioz is the best-looking small SUV for the price right now. I love the rear design especially with the razor-sharp tail-lights, but the entire vehicle is superbly styled and looks far more expensive than the price tag.The same goes for the interior and not just the design, but the feel of the fabrics and materials, switches and the steering wheel. Many SUVs try to aim for a stylish look, but few achieve the feel. This also goes for the thoughtful layout of this cabin that places everything within reach and where it should be.The practicality of the Symbioz is also outstanding. As a mum to two kids that insist on bringing everything everywhere, a small SUV (it’s 4.4m long) is generally too small for us. But the excellent storage, occupant space and boot, which expands from 460L-592L because the rear row is on rails, has me rethinking that rule. If you’re a family in an urban setting but need all the storage and room that kids and adults require, then seriously consider the Symbioz.The materials are also easy to clean and feel hard wearing, too.Finally, the way the Symbioz drives is so engaging. Yes the 1.3-litre four-cylinder petrol engine has a bit of the dreaded turbo lag and yes the seven-speed dual-clutch transmission can be a little clunky.In a world of fully electric cars with seamless stop and go, this engine and transmission feels a bit antiquated, but the Symbioz is still so enjoyable to pilot in an old-school way.As much as I love EVs for urban duties like the daycare drop off, grocery shopping and after-school sports dashes, I’d missed how fun these little runs can be in something with great handling and steering and a grunty little engine.Well, as mentioned the price is a bit steep, but you’re getting a nicer car for the money than many rivals.Also the warranty is only five-years/unlimited kilometres, which is falling behind many mainstream brands. Servicing is required every 30,000km or 12 months. You can buy a five-year service package for $2700 which is about $540 a visit and that’s expensive compared to a few rivals.And then there’s the fuel consumption. The mild hybrid isn’t as fuel efficient as the full hybrid and because I drove it like a rally queen, I used an average of 10.5L/100km over about 150km of driving.The official fuel consumption is 6.4L/100km but personally I don’t think they were flying this small SUV to school and pre-school to Scouts to Kung Fu to birthday parties and tutoring all with just 15 minutes to get to all of these places. With more moderate urban driving, a lower figure is certainly achievable.Finally, the Symbioz has not been rated by ANCAP, but its Continental equivalent, EuroNCAP only gave it four-out-of-five stars for safety. This was partly because it lacks a front centre airbag and front knee airbags, as well as average occupant protection for the driver.

Before the first decade of the 21 century was up, there was evidence the cult of the SUV was well and truly gathering pace. Conventional sedans, hatchbacks and even station wagons were falling victim to the almighty SUV, and even station wagon stalwarts like Volvo were revisiting their future model plans.Which is why diverse Volvo V70 station wagon line-up of previous generations was pared back to just a single model – dubbed T6 AWD - for the 2008 launch of the third-gen V70. Gone were the cooking models and five-cylinder variants with and without turbochargers and in was a high-spec turbocharged six-cylinder V70 with all-wheel drive.In a packaging sense, this was still very much a classic Volvo wagon with a boxy outline and lots of room inside relative to its footprint. But the sharp-edged look of previous V70s was softened a little.And where did the previous V70’s customers go for their next Volvo station wagon? To the new XC70, of course, with its jacked-up ride height, tacked on wheel arch extensions, range of trim and driveline options (including a then-sexy turbo-diesel option) and SUV persona.Which left the V70 with its more conventional looks and stance as some kind of orphan. Thing is, it was probably the better of the two Volvos to drive, with better suspension control and the lower ride height making it more dynamic.A facelift in 2010 brought a revised engine with slightly more power and a claim of better fuel efficiency.In an overall sense, the V70 was a great car. It typified Volvo’s approach to sensible car-making at a time when the company was being pushed into the fashion-driven SUV world. But when you consider that even a Volvo SUV was never going to be an off-road vehicle, the plane-Jane V70 is now the smarter buy.With a very similar all-wheel drive system to the XC70, the V70 is all but as competent on slippery or loose surfaces. And nobody has ever complained about the versatility or practicality of a Volvo two-box wagon.Volvo has made its name on reliability, but like any modern car, increasing complexity can take its toll on this aspect. Because of that, Volvo’s once rock-solid reputation for going the distance had faded a little by the time the V70 came along, and it’s fair to say overall reliability was no longer any better than most other mass-market European brands.Volvo’s simpler (non-turbocharged, front-wheel drive) designs were much less likely to give trouble; proof that complex machinery is often more highly strung.The biggest reliability glitch experienced by the V70 was a tendency for some engines to consume excess oil. In the worst cases, entire engines were being replaced under warranty, and you’d like to think any V70s still out there have been fixed or never had the problem in the first place. A compression check prior to purchase would still be a good idea, however.Some V70s also suffered from poor shift quality in the transmission, and this was sometimes traced back to dirty fluid or a transmission that required a reflash. In a smaller number of cases, the clutches inside the transmission were subject to premature wear.Like any high-performance turbocharged engine, the turbo unit can have a finite lifespan and is almost considered a consumable item. Allow for this in your budget. The same goes for the individual ignition coils which can break down over time, and the V70 seems pretty hard on suspension bushes (probably a function of its 1800-plus kilo kerb mass) and all-wheel drive loads. Cars like this are also hard on brakes, but in the Volvo’s case, the advice is to replace not just the brake pads but also the rotors at the same time. This can get pretty expensive.Make sure all the interior electronics work properly, too. If these are on the blink, you could be chasing intermittent problems for a long time.Despite Volvo’s reputation for building safe cars, it’s interesting to note the V70 was recalled on a couple of major safety fronts over the years. A batch of cars built in 2008 was recalled to check the operation of the side-airbag system, while some cars built in 2010 and 2011 were recalled to check the front airbag deployment.Long after the third-gen V70 was discontinued, a recall notice was also issued to check for front seat belt mounts (cables) that could fray and fail over time.The V70 was also recalled to check cooling fan and fuel-pump operation, and you can check out these recalls in detail by visiting: https://www.vehiclerecalls.gov.au/.Early-build cars were the ones most likely to suffer from reliability issues, so the later the build-date, the better the car is likely to be now.The oil burning problems were reportedly solved by the time the 2012 model landed, so a car with an earlier build date is the one to avoid.People don’t tend to buy Volvo station wagons to look at them in the driveway. So, it’s not uncommon to see examples with 250,000km or even more showing. With proper servicing, this should not signal the end of the vehicle’s useful life, but you’d need to see proof of the correct servicing before handing over the money.The post-facelift version of the V70 had more power from the same engine, so it’s probably the one to choose. Beyond that, there’s not much of a decision to be made as the V70 was only available in one trim level and specification (T6 AWD).If you’re looking for more options in the same package, perhaps look at the previous model (the second-gen V7 from 2000 to 2007) which had a choice of petrol engine outputs, two- or four-wheel drive layouts and different trim levels to suit different budgets. Failing that, the XC70 that sold alongside the third-gen V70 offers turbo-diesel power.Roughies with really high mileage are around for less than $10,000 now, but there’s probably better value in spending closer to the low-teens for something with a service record and more moderate kilometres on board.Volvo is a huge global brand and its cars are sold around the world. So, even if you are struggling to find a part in Australia (unlikely) you can always cast the (inter)net wider and shop overseas for cheaper parts.Be wary of seller you aren’t familiar with, and check out buyer feedback to make sure you’re dealing with a reputable supplier.While earlier versions of the V70 were decent sellers for Volvo in Australia, this version was a pretty slow mover in the showroom. It’s unlikely more than a few hundred were sold which is why they’re now hard to find second-hand.

In just a couple of years, it will have been a decade since the current Mazda 3 made its debut.In that time, it’s outlived many a rival to remain one of just a couple of traditional hatchbacks on sale alongside the ever-present Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic and, if you count it as a Cerato successor, the Kia K4. But how does the 2026 Mazda 3 feel in a new car market that looks very different to the late 2010s when it was just a pup? Refreshingly simple and tactile is the quick answer to that question. But let’s get into why.The specific variant on test here is the Touring hatch, which is the top-spec as far as grades with the smaller 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine go. It starts from $35,410, before on-road costs, and can be had with the brand’s Vision package for an extra $2000 to add surround-view parking cameras, front cross-traffic alert and driver monitoring as well as traffic support (lane and speed assist) and front parking sensors. It’s worth adding, in my view.The Touring also scores:Leather upholstery Electric front seatsWireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlayWireless phone charging Keyless entry and push-button startDual-zone climate controlTwo USB-C ports10.25-inch multimedia touchscreenMultimedia control wheel7.0-inch TFT driver displayDigital radioSatellite navigationPaddle gear shiftersBack to the engine, the 114kW/200Nm 2.0-litre petrol unit falls short on paper compared with the 2.5-litre engine also available (with 139kW/252Nm), but the Touring’s outputs are adequate for a front-wheel drive hatchback.Its 5.9L/100km fuel consumption figure is where some might have doubts over the Mazda 3’s suitability, especially when real-world driving returns a figure in the mid 7.0-litre region, but its lack of a hybrid option means it falls behind its contemporaries regardless of opinion.Still, its six-speed automatic torque-converter transmission is smooth and makes decent use of the modest four-pot.The real treat from behind the wheel is the steering and its ride, though. The Mazda 3 is almost a dynamic benchmark in terms of elevating a capable hatchback into one that’s fun to drive without the assistance of more power.The 3’s steering is direct and weighted just right to be engaging without being tiring, and there’s a level of communication from the front wheels during dynamic driving that you won’t find in a lot of new small cars.While the engine can seem like it’s working hard at times, if you value a car with direct feedback and confidence-inspiring handling, the Mazda 3 will keep you happy. Stepping up to a G25 with the larger engine isn’t a bad move, though.The seating position, control placement and general ergonomics of the cabin make doing anything on the move a breeze, especially the scroll wheel that operates the multimedia screen.It’s on the way out in the next generation if the new Mazda CX-5 is anything to go by, which is a shame. It means not needing to lean and use the Mazda 3’s touchscreen on the move and allows you to navigate both its (ageing but easy) native software or a phone mirroring system.Similarly, the driver display is visually getting on in years, but it’s elegant and shows you what you need to know. It’s also housed in a perfectly shaped binnacle for looking at through the top of the steering wheel. It’s one of the little things that make the interior of the Mazda 3 as impressive as the exterior when it comes to design.The sleek interior manages to blend minimalism and function without sacrificing buttons, a lazy cost-cutting move many manufacturers (including Mazda in its newer models) have started leaning on.Climate controls and a few shortcut buttons around the multimedia control wheel, not to mention the traditional gear shifter, all blend nicely into an interior that rivals (and in some cases bests) the interior design of some highly-regarded European brands.Its gorgeous exterior design does have a downside, though - the boot is relatively small and the rear seat feels tight for adults, plus there’s not a lot of light and the thick C-pillars result in a rather large blind-spot.There are a couple of things to consider if a Mazda 3 is on your list, starting with its safety credentials. Because the current generation was tested in 2019, its maximum five-star rating has expired and it’s unclear how the car would perform against current testing procedures.Mazda has updated the safety kit for the 3 in that time, with some ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance System) features and seven airbags working to keep occupants safe, the tech is ageing and the 3 is missing a front-centre airbag that can be important in side impacts.The Mazda 3 is covered by the brand’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is starting to lag behind other mainstream brands, while servicing averages $475 for the first seven years (subject to change), every 12 months or 15,000km. Mazda also offers five years of roadside assist.

It’s our last chapter with the XUV 3XO - Mahindra’s super-affordable small SUV.We’ve covered three months and a couple of thousand kays in this diminutive thing, and it’s largely served its purpose as my daily runabout, with a few freeway kilometres thrown in for good measure.I’ve had friends and family ride along, I’ve packed the boot to its absolute capacity and I’ve fueled it up regularly. I’ve found annoyances and things I love about it along the way.Now, having handed the keys to my affordable little Mahindra SUV long-termer back, would I recommend it to someone looking for an affordable entry-level car? Read on to find out.Overwhelmingly the thing I’ve liked about this little car is how simple and straightforward it is. Unlike many of its rivals which are full of convoluted software, annoying over-thought features, and sometimes deal-breakingly intrusive driver aids, the XUV 3XO is the kind of car you can just hop in and go without thinking about it.It has a physical start switch, a simple shifter, familiar and logically-placed switchgear and sensible ergonomics.These things shouldn’t be a flex in 2026, but because so many rivals from China seem insistent on touchscreen dependency, cost-cutting disguised as minimalism, and tech for tech’s sake, the Mahindra is refreshing to use.In some ways I think of it as the successor to once-affordable small cars from Japan which were like this.The primary cost you’ll pay is that it isn’t as fancy or up-to-date as some rivals. It’s a shame there’s no hybrid powertrain option for example, and the screens feel small compared to rivals. For someone just looking for zero learning curve, though, this could be the small car antidote you need, especially at this one’s keen $26,990, drive-away price.Still, it has all the basic kit you really need, with some luxuries like a wireless phone charger and wireless phone connectivity. Small, traditional spec details ignored by a lot of cars at this cheap end of the spectrum have been thought of, too. For example, the 3X0 doesn’t get a cheap or no-name tyre package, featuring a nice set of Goodyears which soak up bumps pretty well and provide an appropriate amount of traction, even when the little turbo engine is pushed.I said in my last chapter I think the Mahindra XUV 3XO is sharply-styled and certainly Mahindra’s best looking product.Some folks I took for a ride-along disagreed, with opinions ranging from ‘weird’ to ‘ugly’. I really like that it comes in fun colours, but apparently you all want to stick to monochrome because I was told the ‘Citrine Yellow’ my car came in was "too much like mustard".Then again, I also think the concept of ‘resale’ is the most boring one to curse a lot of modern cars. Annoyingly, if you want the Citrine Yellow, Dune Beige, or Nebula Blue colours you have to splash for this top-spec AX7L version, as the base AX5L comes in the usual palette.Apparently people care about this ‘resale’ concept less these days, too, because they seem willing to take a chance on a new Chinese brand over brands which traditionally perform well in this department like Honda, Mitsubishi and Toyota.If you’re considering the Mahindra get the fun colours, this brand is hardly known for its great residuals.One thing universally praised by friends and family is the impressive amount of room on the inside of this little Mahindra despite its modest footprint.At 182cm tall I am easily able to find a comfortable driving position, but I also fit behind my own driving position with a small amount of airspace for my knees. Plus, the back of the front seat is clad in soft finishes, so even if you were taller than me, at least your knees will be pressing against something soft.Headroom is great in the front and acceptable in the rear, with the sunroof eating a little into headspace. I had enough room for my head still, however.The rear seat is also impressively wide, and there’s no rise in the floor for a driveshaft, as there’s no all-wheel drive 3XO, so there’s even room for a middle passenger to put their feet.Cabin storage is decent, with big cupholders in the front and rear doors, which it needs because the two in the front console and rear drop-down armrest are quite shallow for taller vessels.As mentioned in the last chapter, it also has an array of glorious buttons, even a dedicated climate panel, reducing the dependence on the touchscreen. On the flipside, there are limited additional storage options in the cabin, with only a tiny armrest box, and no big pass-under tray like many rivals with more luxurious bridge-style consoles get.For me, this meant a lot of objects ending up on the passenger side floor or on the back seat.The boot is the real party trick, though. Looking at this car in its side-profile, and you’d be forgiven for thinking it barely has one. There’s almost no distance between the rear window and the back of the car itself, and yet through brilliance of design the boot is good for a vehicle in this class.It’s deep, offering 364 litres of space (better than the 200-300 offered by many rivals) and is able to take two of the three CarsGuide luggage cases at a time. It even has a space-saver spare under the floor.I found some interesting, albeit minor, quality issues with my car. Stuff that you almost never see on Japanese, Korean, or even Chinese cars these days.The most egregious example was the rear LED strip which seemed like it was slightly loosely secured to the boot lid. This resulted in an irritating plastic squeaking noise, both when you shut or opened the boot lid, but you could also hear it over bumps and corrugations on the road.The boot seemed to creak and groan in the corners, perhaps flexing. It is made of a very light and thin metal.The floor mat across the rear also didn’t fit precisely and moved around when you put your feet on it as though it was an aftermarket accessory which didn’t quite get the floor measurements right.The 3XO is also pretty noisy at freeway speed, but this is to be expected for a small and light car in this class. Remember to check out part one of this review on why this car is actually pretty good to drive.Last chapter I singled out fuel consumption as a major downside, with this little SUV throwing back a less than impressive 7.4L/100km, but in the time since it has managed to redeem itself.Fuel consumption overall dropped to just 6.4L/100km, which is less than the official figure of 6.5L/100km. This is probably due to introducing a lot more more freeway kilometres, but it speaks to the difference between urban, mixed and high-speed fuel consumption on a car like this with a traditional six-speed automatic transmission.The fuel tank is also a bit small. At 42 litres I was re-filling more often than I would have liked.While the 3XO is largely free of the array of deal-breakingly annoying safety tech which plagues a lot of its rivals from China, it also hasn’t been ANCAP tested, and if it were, I fear it wouldn’t fare well.On paper it ticks a few boxes, with six airbags and things like auto emergency braking and lane keeping aids, but it rides on an older platform and misses out on blind spot monitoring, instead using a blind spot camera system.

Mazda hasn’t forgotten the little things.Most carmakers are moving away from little hatchbacks as sales dwindle as buyers jump into SUVs instead.Mazda has stayed true to its roots by refreshing its ageing Mazda2 instead of tossing it into the too hard basket, giving new and urban drivers a quality choice of wheels.The 2 is no longer the sub-$20,000 proposition it once was with the base Evolve grade tested here starting at $27,290 (before on-road costs). The better-equipped GT grade adds $1200 to the price, and you can get the GT in sedan form for the same price.That makes it about $2000 cheaper than the most affordable Toyota Yaris, which has the added benefit of hybrid power, and about $3000 thriftier than the Volkswagen Polo.A new wave of Chinese machines undercut it, with the MG3 about $7000 cheaper, while even BYD’s electric Atto 1 costs about $5000 less.Relying on purely petrol power the Mazda2 shows its age without any form of electrification in an era when hybrid is king and electric is the wannabe usurper.It uses a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine that makes 81kW and 142Nm, matched to a conventional six-speed automatic transmission that drives the front wheels.Mazda claims it drinks just 5.0 litres of the cheapest petrol per 100km.Rival hybrids slash at least 1.0L/100km off that figure and deliver more zip from the petrol-electric combo.The 2 is a handsome machine, and has its competitors beat for design. It wears Mazda’s trademark features with an elegance long gone from small cars.Buyers can expect 16-inch black alloy wheels, LED headlights with auto on and off feature, auto folding black side mirrors, chrome exhaust and a little body coloured garnish in the front grille.Step inside and you’re greeted by a cabin that hasn’t been corrupted by modern distractions.A 7.0-inch multimedia display is small by modern standards, but that’s probably a good thing for young drivers.It is controlled via the touchscreen or rotary dial in the centre console when stationary, with touchscreen controls taken away when moving. The idea being you keep your eyes on the road more.The rotary dial is a bit of overkill as the screen controls so few functions that a touchscreen would suffice.It comes with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto smartphone mirroring, digital radio and in-built sat nav.The driver’s instruments are analogue with just an old school digital readout that gives Casio watch vibes for some functions.A head-up display is one of the most useful features in modern cars, and a must for new and experienced drivers alike.Mazda’s head-up display uses a little folding clear screen to project vital information such as travelling speed, posted speed limit and some safety warnings in front of the driver in an easy to view and read spot.Passengers are greeted by black cloth-wrapped seats with red contrast stitching that are well cushioned and comfortable enough for long drives. The GT grade ups the ante with synthetic leather and suede upholstery.A leather-wrapped steering wheel, gear shifter and hand brake give it a more premium feel.Well placed and easy to read steering wheel buttons for volume, multimedia, cruise control and answering the phone are a win for users.There are physical dials for climate functions that are easy to use on the go and a pair of USB-A ports up front so modern phone users beware you’ll need a different charging cord or adapter.A physical handbrake means storage options in the centre console don’t go much further than two cupholders and very small storage bin. This is a little car, so storage options in general are limited.This extends to the rear seat, which is cramped and best suited for only two adults and long-legged humans might struggle on longer trips.Front facing child seats can fit easily but rear facing or capsule seats will severely restrict front-seat passengers.The boot is mini at just 250 litres, so think moderate weekly shop or a few overnight bags. If you need more the sedan ups it to a substantial 440 litres. You can fold down the back seat in both to liberate more space.It does have a space-saver spare tyre under the boot floor, which is a positive.The Mazda2 is one of the most compact machines you can buy at 4085mm long, 1695mm wide, 1495mm tall and with a wheelbase - the distance between the front and rear axles - of 2570mm.You’ll feel tiny on the road, with dual-cab utes and large SUVs towering over you, but in urban environments, tight city streets and underground carparks, the size difference pays off with easy commuting and access to parking spots others just drive right by.It is a commendable city driver that feels most at home in traffic and city streets, as it feels a little breathless and lightweight on motorways.The small engine is perfect for urban driving but you’ll need to work it hard to get up to speed with power delivered very high in the rev range. This means you’ll hear the engine revving to the sky when you accelerate.It feels asthmatic when travelling up steep hills with the car noticeably struggling on the sizeable inclines in and around Sydney. In flatter cities such as Melbourne or Adelaide you’d barely notice it running out of puff.It is a great little car to steer, with great feedback, well balanced, direct and responsive steering.It is light, so you’ll feel bumps and lumps along the way but it does a great job of ironing out the road imperfections for a little machine.Road noise is intrusive at higher speeds and on coarse chips roads, but mostly it is composed and refined.Mazda’s driver’s side mirror is magnified, which takes some getting used to and the jury is still out if it is absolutely necessary.All driver aids work as advertised.The car automatically applying the brakes if it detects a potential collision, it’ll warn you if something is in your blind spot or if a car is approaching from the side as you reverse and an array of sensors will help keep you centred in your lane.Mazda backs it cars with a five year/unlimited kilometre warranty, which is par for the course these days and quickly becoming a subpar package as more brands switch to seven, eight or ten-year guarantees.Seven years of capped price servicing will cost $3286, which is pricey compared to the rival Toyota Yaris. Owners need to visit the workshop every 15,000km or 12 months, whichever comes first.

Affordable cars from China have overrun the Australian market, forcing once favourites from Japan out of the top-10, and putting pressure on the rest hailing from South Korea to Europe.Yet amongst this, one Indian manufacturer is hoping to ride the affordable Chinese wave as an alternative.Mahindra has had a resurgence in Australia, releasing an array of surprisingly competitive new products as part of a renewed global push toward a wider audience.The car we’ve nabbed for this long-term test, the oddly-named XUV 3X0 is the brand’s latest.It’s a crossover SUV which represents the entry-point to the Mahindra line-up, starting from a very keen $23,990, drive-away.As rival Chinese brand Chery might know, though, just being affordable isn’t enough. The cars have to be good, too.Does the XUV 3X0 have what it takes or will you be wishing you spent a little more? Read on to see what I found in my first month.Okay, let’s set the scene before we get into impressions. You can have one of these from the aforementioned starting price, but the one we have is top of the two-variant range, the AX7L, which is priced at $26,990, drive-away.For exactly the same money, you could get into the best selling Chery Tiggo 4, also in top-spec Ultimate form, with the larger MG ZS Turbo (basic Vibe form, $25,990, drive-away), and Haval Jolion (basic Premium form, $26,990, drive-away) also options.If you’re looking for something from a longer established brand, your options include the ageing Hyundai Venue (auto - $25,750, before on-roads) or the Suzuki Fronx ($28,990, before on-roads), both of which are more size-appropriate in this city crossover space.So your choices are a larger, better equipped car from China, an older car from Korea, or a more expensive car from Japan.Some food for thought is the equipment list, which stays just on the right side of good, with a few omissions.The 3X0 ticks all the key boxes - 17-inch alloys, LED headlights, synthetic leather interior trim, dual 10.25-inch screens for the digital dash and the multimedia touchscreen, wireless phone connectivity and charging, as well as a panoramic sunroof, 360-degree parking camera, and Harman Kardon premium audio on this top-spec one.It might not have a few luxuries such as heated and power adjusting seats like a high-spec Tiggo 4 for example, but for a small basic car it feels the part.Looking at the 3X0 from the outside, I’m pretty impressed with its sharp design. From a brand once known for its particularly hideous takes on the standard SUV archetypes, the 3X0 is maybe its best looking car yet, featuring sharp contemporary headlight designs, a cohesive design front to rear (the larger Scorpio is yet to feel so tidy), angular design motifs with some nice highlight detailing and trendy touches like the two-tone roof and diamond-cut alloys.You could hardly tell from the outside that the 3X0 is an older Korean car underneath. Yep, that’s right, the 3X0 can trace its underpinnings back to the SsangYong Tivoli thanks to the South Korean automaker’s time being owned by Mahindra.It’s much more obvious inside, where some switchgear is identical to the SsangYong, while other bits, like the lower portion of the centre console also share a familiarity.The digital dash and multimedia touchscreen, however, feel much more modern, giving the cabin an up-to-date touch courtesy of Mahindra’s latest software, which is easy to use.Aesthetically, the screens are pretty much the only thing keeping the 3X0’s interior in this decade, with old-school plastics and too much of the much-maligned piano black cladding the dash, but there’s something refreshing about the simplicity of it all.Those paying attention would have noticed the glorious abundance of buttons and dials making everything in this car easy to control and proving you can still build an affordable car without hiding all the climate functions in touchscreen sub-menus.My initial impression continues behind the wheel where the 3X0 feels like a car from 10 years ago but somehow in a good way.Let me explain. Too many compact SUVs in this class are dynamically a mess and dull to steer thanks to their continuously variable transmissions (CVTs), or are otherwise unintuitive in daily traffic thanks to fuel-saving dual-clutch automatics.Generally, you have to splash for something more expensive or to a hybrid to make many options in this class nice to drive.Not so in the 3X0. Don’t get me wrong, this car isn’t particularly special in what it offers, but it’s the refreshingly straightforward combination of a gruff little 1.2-litre turbocharged three-cylinder engine (82kW/200Nm) and a real old-school six-speed automatic transmission which makes it a surprising pleasure to steer.Its relative light weight and firm suspension keep it tidy in the corners, while little boosts of turbo surge are enough to put a smile on your face without getting out of sorts.Even the steering is a straightforward power assisted set-up without an annoying amount of artificial software weighting as in some of its Chinese rivals.I even found myself not needing to scroll through a bunch of sub-menus to turn off the usual array of poorly-calibrated safety systems. The 3X0 either doesn’t have them, or they’re not annoying enough to warrant turning off.In a way, this is a brand new car for someone who wants an old car. Tired of the annoyances of many modern vehicles, the 3X0 is a fun, basic little car to hop into as a palette cleanser.Our little crossover isn’t doing so great on the fuel consumption front. According to my calculations (which I had to do because the computer only shows the consumption in km/L rather than L/100km), the 3X0 is drinking around 7.4L/100km which is too high for such a compact unit.Perhaps it's the fact I drive it a little more aggressively than I would otherwise, as I try to push the turbo surge and resulting fun out of the meagre 82kW on offer, but it’s still a number I’d expect to see out of an older non-turbo model.One cost of having a six-speed auto, it seems, is driving style will weigh more heavily on how much fuel you use.It’s also a bit of bill shock having to refuel this car sooner than expected and during a fuel crisis. The roughly 450km travelled on my first tank of fuel cost me a whopping $61.33 at the pump, three times what it might cost me to travel the same distance in a larger EV.Next month we’ll talk about practicality, some quirks I’ve found and see if we can drill down on that fuel consumption a little more.Acquired: June 2026Distance travelled this month: 446kmOdometer: 6880kmAverage fuel consumption this month: 7.4L/100km

Although it was never a huge seller, the GM2 (Honda’s in-house code) Honda City four-door sedan was eventually replaced by the GM6 model, and with that update came a bigger car in pretty much every direction, further differentiating the City from the more popular Honda Jazz hatchback.The GM6 City was both longer and taller than the car it replaced and, crucially, there was an extra 50mm in the wheelbase, giving both a larger cabin and more boot space. Clearly, Honda had worked out that City buyers were a pragmatic bunch.Mechanically, not much had changed, though, and the 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine with its fairly meagre 88kW remained the only choice. You could still get a five-speed manual, but only in the entry-level version, and just about everybody who bought a City brand new specified the continuously variable transmission (CVT) anyway.Trim levels were also unchanged with the VTi the base version and the VTi-L for those who had a bit more to spend. The VTi-L step-up got you paddle shifters for the CVT (an affectation, to be sure) a leather-clad steering wheel, better stereo and 16-inch alloy wheels. Curiously, the VTi had simple, steel wheels of 15 inches.Generally, yes. Even though the City is built in Thailand and not Honda’s home-base of Japan, quality seems pretty good. You also get Honda’s engineering flair in the case of the zingy little engine with its variable valve timing and great fuel economy. But that doesn’t mean the City will appeal to keener drivers out there; the suspension is too soft and the steering too slow for that.If you don’t need the arguably more versatile packaging of a hatchback, then the City’s roomy interior and boot makes plenty of sense.Just bear in mind that `good’ doesn’t mean sexy.But in this case it does mean safe and the City scored the maximum five stars for safety in local independent testing.Like the vast majority of Hondas built anywhere in the world, the City seems to be pretty robust and able to go the distance. That, however, is on the proviso that it’s been maintained, but that goes for any make and model.Overall, instances of major failures and owner complaints are few and far between.Probably the most common problem exhibited by the Honda City is a CVT that shudders on take-off or slips or jerks when the driver applies a load to the driveline. The good news is that, unlike many CVTs from other makers, the Honda’s unit is a lot stronger (possibly due to the fact that Honda makes its own CVT to its own standards) and problems like these are often fixed with a change of transmission fluid to replace the old, dirty fluid.The exception is the model year 2014 City, a batch of which was fitted with an incorrect shaft within the transmission. Under high loads, this shaft could sheer off, leaving the vehicle with either no drive at all, or locked front wheels. A Honda dealer can check the VIN of a particular City and know whether it was affected by this.Most experts reckon the CVT fluid should be changed every 50,000km to keep everything running smoothly and reduce wear to a minimum.The exception to this good track record will be the City that has been neglected in regards to its routine maintenance. The complex little engine uses a maze of tiny oilways to power its variable valve timing and lift function (which gives the engine its sparkle). But if regular servicing has been missed, these oilways can soon fill up with sludge and dirt, at which point the engine can’t perform properly.The City also uses a timing chain, so that component should last the life of the car and not need periodic replacement like a toothed rubber belt in many other makes and models.The City GM6 was recalled twice, the first for that CVT with the dodgy internal shaft that could fail at any time. The other recall was for a batch of cars built across 2019 and 2020, in which the electric fuel pump could suddenly die, leaving you stranded wherever that failure occurred.You can search for more recall data at: https://www.vehiclerecalls.gov.au/That 2014 batch of Citys with the iffy shaft in their CVT are the ones to avoid now. Although if the car has been fixed as part of the associated safety recall, then the modified City should be just as robust as any other City. But if the City you’re looking at is a manual-transmission car, disregard the above as it was only the CVT that was affected.Beyond that, buy on condition and service history rather than build date.The majority of Citys have never strayed too far from the, er, city. Nor have they been embraced by couriers and Uber drivers, so you don’t see too many with a lot of kilometres on board.That said, there’s absolutely no reason to think that a well-serviced City won’t push through the 200,000km mark with lots of life left in it. In any case, a high percentage of Citys for sale right now have less than 100,000km on their odometers, suggesting lots of reliable motoring still to be had.We’d often advise against the version of any car with a CVT, but the Honda’s in-house CVT seems a lot better than most of the rest out there. So there’s no problem with a City with two pedals if that makes life easier. It will certainly make the car a lot easier to unload come trade-in time, too.And since the price difference between the VTi and the ritzier VTi-L version is a lot less now than when the car was brand new, there seems little reason not to opt for the more luxurious latter variant as a second-hand buy.Prices for early GM6 Citys start at around the $9000 or $10,000 mark, but they’ll nearly always be high-mileage cars (say, 160,000km or more, if that bothers you).Prices top out at closer to mid-to-high teens and for that, you’ll be buying a low-kilometre car in excellent condition. Just don’t forget to check the service history.Even though the City was not a huge seller here, parts and servicing are no problem. You can tap into the Honda dealer network and pay a little more, but the popularity of the Honda brand means there’s a huge aftermarket and enthusiast scene for the brand.Global popularity for Honda products generally means there’s also a healthy online marketplace for sourcing spare parts, service items and accessories.The City sales story is one of steadily falling volumes as the years have passed. Although the car sold a few thousand units in its first year or two of sales, buy the end of 2019, that figure had fallen to just over 600 sales for the year.That’s not a judgment on the Honda, but the reality of the small sedan market in this country as we shifted to hatchbacks and, notably, SUVs.

The GAC Aion UT is the first GAC I’ve ever driven, so I went into this review not really knowing what to expect. Sort of like walking through a room in the dark, in a house that isn’t yours.It was full of discovery but without all the falling over and toe stubbing. First, what is the Aion UT? It's a fully electric small hatch that almost crosses into SUV territory with its slightly elevated ride height.At 4270mm long it’s a similar length to the BYD Dolphin, but shorter than an MG4 Urban, but it does match the MG's price at $31,990 before on-road costs. That’s for the entry grade Premium Aion UT tested here. The price is impressive. It’s an electric car for the same money as a petrol car of a similar size, like a Honda HR-V.The Premium grade has an almost identical features list to the top grade luxury, from powered and heated front seats to a 14.6-inch touchscreen. All it misses out on really, is ventilated seats, wireless phone charging and a power tailgate. The Aion UT is not just an affordable small car, it’s more practical than many larger vehicles thanks to clever storage andplenty of cabin space. The UT’s 2750mm wheelbase is on the longer side for cars this small and that’s a good thing for occupant space and excellent rear legroom is the result. Rear headroom is more than adequate too, thanks to a tall and flat roofline.Storage is outstanding with a deep centre console bin and an area underneath for bags. There’s even a hatch under the dash that opens to reveal a netted pocket. There are door pockets, cupholders and a phone tray up front that doubles as a wireless charger if you stump up the extra $4000 for the Luxury grade.The 321-litre boot isn’t enormous but it's large for a car this size with enough space for a week’s worth of shopping for my family of four or a couple of smaller luggage bags.The main practicality downside is the lack of physical buttons in the cabin for functions such as climate control and media. There are none at all apart from on the steering wheel and the window switches.Instead, all controls are accessed through the central touchscreen and not only is that more awkward to use but it's a safety concern. A driver could easily be distracted just trying to turn the cabin temperature down.We lived with the Aion UT for a week doing what families do: from school runs and weekend sports to grocery shopping and family visits. This is a front-wheel-drive electric car with a 60kWh battery and 150kW/210Nm motor. That battery size is good for 430km of driving range (WLTP) according to GAC and after 250km in one week there was 170km left, making that claim accurate. Our average energy consumption was 15.6kWh/100km according to the trip computer, which is less than the official 16.4kWh/100km.In the city and urban areas where we live the UT shines with brisk acceleration, its quiet and smooth nature, good visibility and small size. On motorways, as we found during a trip to a regional area, the UT feels slightly vulnerable among the trucks and the stability was tested in the windy, rainy weather. There were times I wished we were in something larger and higher up.The driving position is let down by the steering wheel's lack of reach adjustment. I got around this by adjusting my seat, although it's not ideal.Also not ideal is a persistent driver alert system that reminds you to slow down and avoid distraction. It activates far too easily and interferes with concentration while driving. It’s not just the driver being hassled either. My front passenger was told on one occasion not to put her feet on the dashboard even though they weren’t - she had her legs crossed and this seemed to trigger the system.Finally the styling of the Aion UT isn’t appealing to me. GAC boasts that the little electric car was penned at its Milan design centre, but Chinese rivals like Zeekr and BYD have much more interesting and beautiful creations.

If you go right back into Honda history, you may recall the original Honda City was a tiny hatchback with odd, upright looks and a good dollop of charm. But fast forward to 2009 when this version, the GM2 hit showrooms, and the whole City concept had grown up somewhat.Yes, it was still a small car and undercut the Honda Civic in terms of price and size, but didn’t Honda already have the Jazz hatchback to fill the gap left by the original City?Or course it did. So where did that leave the City? Well, kind of in a no-man’s-land, and considering it was more or less mechanically a Jazz in sedan’s clothes, Honda was making things hard for itself. At this end of the market, hatchbacks were always the stronger players in Australia, by a huge margin in most cases, too. So the City’s straight-laced duds were pretty much guaranteed to hold it back.Launched here in 2009, the City was built in Thailand and was available in VTi and VTi-L specifications. All Cities were four-door sedans and the engine was the same in every variant; a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine making 88kW and 145Nm. The only mechanical choice lay in the transmission and you could have a five-speed manual or a five-speed conventional automatic.But even though it was somewhat ignored by new-car buyers, as a used-car buy, the Honda starts to come back into the running as buyers’ original concerns over fashion and fripperies are replaced by a focus on reliability and long-term prospects.The City was a slow seller, but that had nothing to do with its quality or reliability. Instead, the somewhat dowdy four-door sedan styling was the sticking point, combined with the fact that everybody in this market segment really wanted a hatchback Honda Jazz.As a used-car, however, that fashionista stuff goes straight out the window, and the City re-emerges as a smart buy thanks to its sharp build quality and long-term prospects. This type of car was also usually bought brand-new by pretty conservative buyers who understood proper maintenance. And that makes the City an even better bet now.The City faithfully follows decades of Honda tradition by being well made and reliable. Chronic problems are few and most owners have enjoyed trouble-free experiences with the Honda.Although it’s a very clever mechanical system, Honda’s V-Tec variable valve timing system operates on tiny oilways and passages. That means any dirt of sludge in the oil is bad news as it can block these oilways and cause the V-Tec to simply not work. It’s certainly not a common problem on these cars, but a check of the service history is mandatory.We’ve also heard of a few Citys where the heater’s blower motor has failed. The first symptom will be a fan that only works on the flat-out setting. Replacing the fan is the only permanent fix, apparently.The majority of other complaints surround the build quality (this was a Thai-built car, not Japanese, remember) and things like high levels of interior noise. Again, the thinner carpet fitted to many Thai-built cars might be the culprit. Either way, the City never quite measured up to Honda’s otherwise lofty quality standards.The City is relatively free of recall notices apart form one major safety issue. The car was caught up in the Takata airbag fiasco that saw millions of cars affected by potentially faulty airbags that could injure and even kill passengers in a crash.As time passed and more and more cars were added to the list of affected vehicles, more and more recalls were issued for these airbags. A Honda dealer should be able to identify whether your car has been fixed or not. In some states, cars that have not had their Takata airbags replaced cannot even be re-registered.Beyond that, the City has a pretty clean record with just one other recall being for a potential fault within the clever V-Tec engine valve assembly. In some cases, a spring could break, allowing the car to stall without warning.You can check the details at https://www.vehiclerecalls.gov.au/.Since pretty much all Citys of this generation were affected by the Takara airbag recall, there’s not much to choose between the various years. Buy on condition and service history rather than build date.There’s the odd City out there from this generation with better than 200,000km on board, backing up the car’s reputation for overall reliability. But most of them for sale right now have travelled fewer kilometres than that, backing up the typical usage profile of the people who bought them brand-new.You can still find them with less then 100,000km showing, but we wouldn’t be put off by one with 160,000km on the odometer, provided the service history is complete and intact.A facelift in 2012 was the only real change to the City formula across its 'GM2' lifespan. And while it didn’t amount to a whole lot, it did bring thicker windscreen glass and carpets to help muffle some of the interior noise the vehicle was criticised for when new. Beyond that, buy purely on condition and service history.And, of course, if the budget will allow, buy the VTi-L for its extra standard equipment, since the price difference between VTi-L and the base-model VTi will be very small now.Prices start at around the $7000 to $8000 mark and top out at about $12,000 for exceptionally clean examples with moderate kilometres. Those prices are, in fact, pretty much line-ball with the City’s stablemate the Jazz. And given the latter’s hatchback layout and much greater popularity, that starts to make the City look a bit expensive, to be honest. That said, somewhere around $10K for a modern small sedan with a decent pedigree and plenty of life left in it is hardly extortion, is it?Even though the City was not a huge seller here, parts and servicing are no problem. You can tap into the Honda dealer network and pay a little more, but the popularity of the Honda brand means there’s a huge aftermarket and enthusiast scene for the brand.Global popularity for Honda products generally means there’s also a healthy online marketplace for sourcing spare parts, service items and accessories. Be wary of any overseas seller you haven’t used before, as aftermarket parts quality can vary enormously.Buyer indifference when it was brand new meant the City is now pretty thin on the ground as a used buy. In fact, after a brief flurry of sales when it was first launched, annual sales of the City dropped back to less than 2000 per year. Even a price-cut for the facelifted version in 2012 couldn’t stop the rot and probably less than a thousand City’s were sold after that.And that is why there’s now maybe a half a dozen GM2 Citys for sale even on the bigger online sales sites. Compared with the 40 or 50 Honda Jazzes from the same period for sale right now, you can see how the consumers voted.