Toyota BZ4X vs Mazda MX-30

What's the difference?

When the bZ4X first launched it was already late to the game and blended into the background too much. However, this update has dramatically improved its appeal.

Despite this, the electric mid-size SUV segment is incredibly fierce and it’s hard to not get caught up in glitzier rivals like the BYD Sealion 7, Tesla Model Y and Zeekr 7X.

It’ll be interesting to see whether the Australian public reacts to this update and if it draws in more punters.

The MX-30 is a tough one to give you a clear verdict on. In summary, though, the math just doesn’t add up. This car is way too expensive and offers next to no range for Australia’s vast intercity distances, essentially resigning buyers to a life within city limits.

On the other hand, I love the design ethos of this little SUV. It’s truly a statement, and it’s rare to find a car that is so committed to its uniqueness. It’s also easily one of the best EVs to drive right now, so those who understand its compromises will no doubt be left with smiles on their faces.

The exterior design of the bZ4X never really blew me away. It’s just sensible and not too out there. In saying that though, being sensible is no bad thing and can be seen as a positive for some buyers.

This facelift has brought Toyota’s new corporate look, including the hammerhead shark-like LED lighting signature. It already features on models like the C-HR, Camry and RAV4. In fact this update has made the bZ4X look more like an electric RAV4 than ever before.

I like the C-shaped daytime running lights but I’m not a fan of how the main headlight section is now separate. I prefer how they looked before.

The black wheel arch cladding is now also glossy and not matte. Sure, this looks great right now, but it likely won’t be long until it unfortunately gets scratched.

Inside, if you covered up the Toyota badge you could likely fool me into thinking this is a Lexus. The new 14.0-inch touchscreen is virtually identical to the one in models like the Lexus NX, RX and GX.

There are also plenty of premium-feeling soft-touch materials around the cabin. I’m not a huge fan of the grey and white two-tone interior, at least from a family-friendly standpoint, but thankfully you can get an all-black interior instead.

Another major design change with the interior is the new centre console. It now features two wireless chargers and a revised button layout. I particularly like it because it’s no longer covered in glossy piano black.

The MX-30 oozes design. I would go so far as to say this car is more focused on being a design statement than it is an SUV (as evidenced by its lack of practicality…) or an EV (as evidenced by its lack of range…).

Mazda’s Kodo design language is already eye-grabbing, so it’s to the MX-30’s credit that it manages to be striking, even against other members of the Mazda family, as it strays from a well-refined formula.

The large grille has been dumped in favour of something much smaller but the 3D effect of the Kodo face still persists. The light clusters adopt their own personality - they're inspired by the Mazda3, arguably, but they stand on their own.

The side profile, squat dimensions, and contrasting panel work (in our car’s case, a matte grey against the brand’s signature ‘Soul Red’) alert you to the fact that the MX-30 is something quite different indeed. And all this is before you notice the fact that it has clamshell rear doors.

Yep, that’s right, the MX-30 reaches into the brand’s history and brings back the outward folding door design once seen on the RX-8 rotary sports coupe. Opening it up is an event, and those doors wow onlookers with their unusual unfurling. Unfortunately, it’s not as smart as it looks, but we’ll get to that in the practicality part of this review.

The inside again blends familiar Mazda themes with entirely new ones. The material design is incredible. For the first time in a long time, I felt like a kid in some kind of tactile science museum, prodding, squeezing, and scratching at this car’s many interior elements to see if they were, in fact, made of the occasionally unbelievable materials they seem to be.

It doesn’t disappoint. Yes, the door cards really have a splash of an odd grey carpet material, very Volvo, the seats are really trimmed in some sort of synthetic leather, the quality grain of which has to be felt to be understood (it's very Mercedes), and the centre console is really made of recycled cork panelling, which is very BMW.

All of this might sound a bit silly (and the cork stuff perhaps is) but along with the stepped centre console design, weird semi-digital dash cluster and familiar bits out of other Mazdas, it is difficult to not enjoy being in such a creative and unusual space.

The commitment to this funky, unusual design, has some major practicality drawbacks, which we’ll take a look at next.

The front seats in the bZ4X are deliciously comfortable and supportive. They make long trips a breeze, plus the ventilation that’s standard on the AWD trim works well in the heat.

Despite this, I’m still not a huge fan of the driving position. You need to look over the steering wheel in order to view the almost windscreen-mounted digital instrument cluster. It’s a similar set-up to what Peugeot employs and is intended to reduce the amount you need to stray your eyes from the road.

I appreciate this but it just doesn’t work for everyone. Personally I need to jack the seat up more than I’d like in order to see the screen fully. When I do this my knees get in the way of the steering wheel no matter how I position it, which isn’t ideal.

The set-up in the related Solterra is a little better as it has a squared-off steering wheel instead of a traditional round steering wheel.

Going back to the digital instrument cluster, the content display on this is still rather limited. Thankfully, critical information like your current speed is displayed clearly, but having added customisation through more informative displays to toggle through or more themes would be a nice extra touch.

Moving across the larger touchscreen multimedia system is a welcome addition, but I didn’t think there was anything wrong with the old one. The user interface is still basic in a good way, meaning it’s hard to get lost.

A difference is the climate control features are now fully integrated into the touchscreen, save two physical dials that change the dual-zone climate control temperature.

While this means you need to press on the touchscreen to change certain climate control-related features now, a lot of these in the pre-update were touch-sensitive buttons on a panel under the touchscreen. Really, it makes no difference.

Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are still standard and work flawlessly with my iPhone 15 Pro Max. There are now also two wireless chargers, which is great if you want to charge your phone and your passenger’s phone.

However, they don’t work properly as they don’t offer any ventilation. They regularly make my phone overheat and stop charging, even on shorter trips. If you want to reliably top your phone’s battery up, it’s best to just plug into a USB port with a cable.

Looking elsewhere around the cabin, there is an adequate amount of storage, though some more would be nice. There are two decently sized cupholders, a small shelf under the centre console and a side-hinging centre console box. Like the pre-update version, there is still no proper glove box.

In the second row there’s plenty of legroom available for adults behind adults, though due to the placement of the high-voltage battery this leaves you with a knees-up feeling. This is common in a number of EVs, even some that are based on dedicated electric architectures, like the bZ4X.

Headroom also isn’t fantastic as the roof starts to taper back where your head is located. You wouldn’t want to be much taller than 180-odd centimetres back there. It’s also made worse when you recline the seat backrest.

Second-row amenities include air vents, heated outboard rear seats, USB-C ports, seatback map pockets, as well as a fold-down armrest with some cupholders and a tablet holder.

At the back there is a hands-free power tailgate which is rather slow to open and close and makes plenty of beeping while doing so. It's a classic Toyota on this front.

The bZ4X AWD offers 410L of boot space with the rear seats upright which is slightly less than the 2WD due to the added rear electric motor.

It’s a decent space but doesn’t stand out from the crowd. There’s some extra underfloor storage which is large enough to fit some cables and that’s about it. Unfortunately there’s no front boot.

Boot-related amenities include a cargo blind, a variety of hooks, as well as vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability using 220V/1500W AC inverter and a single household power socket. The latter allows you to power household appliances using the vehicle’s high-voltage battery.

Disappointingly there is no spare wheel, but this isn’t uncommon for EVs. You have to make do with a tyre repair kit, which is fine if you have a small air leak but pointless if you have a proper puncture.

Put simply, the MX-30 is about as practical as a sports coupe, which is a feat given it has the footprint and height of an SUV.

It starts with those clamshell doors. Sure, they look amazing, but they’re annoying to open because the handle is on the inside, so you have to open the front doors before you can open the rear ones. At best this costs you time when you’re just trying to load objects, pets, or kids, at worst it makes the rear of the cabin nearly impossible to access in a tight car park.

Even in my unit parking spot, I could barely access the rear seats, making it especially annoying when I just wanted to chuck a bag in the rear footwell.

Even if you don’t have trouble getting an adult back there, space is limited. Behind my own driving position, my knees were up against the seat in front, and while I had plenty of headroom, it feels a bit claustrophobic, thanks to the tiny windows and high beltline.

I’ll hand some credit to the commitment to this car’s design, though, the odd carpet trims continue into the rear doors, and there's even a plush padded surface for your elbows on either side. Nice touch. The seats also feel unusually low and sporty for an SUV, particularly an electric one.

As if it couldn’t be more clear that this car has the intention of being some sort of sports coupe, the front seats are lovely. Comfortable, supportive, and with plenty of soft trims throughout the cabin, I felt as though I had plenty of room here. The raised console design means the multimedia functions and toggles were easy to reach and use, and while the climate functions are somewhat awkwardly placed on a touch panel, at least they were set and forget most of the time.

There’s a tactile dial for volume control, and although the multimedia interface is dial-based rather than touch, Mazda’s system is one of the easiest to use once you get used to it.

There’s a large storage area under the centre console, hosting two USB ports and a household power outlet, and atop that there’s a cork-finished tray, which flips up to reveal dual bottle holders in the centre. Behind this there’s a small armrest console box, trimmed in the same plush padding as the doors and seats. Front occupants can also make use of small pockets in the doors and a glovebox.

Unlike some electric cars, the MX-30 doesn’t score a ‘frunk’, which seems like a wasted opportunity because the engine bay is half empty. Serviceable items look incredibly easy to access because of this, with liquid tanks and coolant hoses on display, but I can’t help but feeling Mazda could have put a small storage space here with some packaging trickery. It’s equally possible that there’s a crash-safety consideration, however.

Moving to the boot, and unfortunately there’s a small-hatch-sized 311 litres on offer, because there’s also next to no underfloor space, and you’ll have to store your charging cables in there, too, further reducing the space. With the cable bags strapped in place, the boot fit our largest (124L) CarsGuide travel case with little extra room to spare. It’s weekender luggage space at best, but then I suppose you won’t be able to go away for long with the range on offer anyway…

The price and features equation for electric cars is somewhat different from the status quo of their combustion equivalents. You can’t just consider standard spec inclusions, there’s a need to factor in range and charging capability, too, as battery capacity and AC to DC charging converters can have a dramatic effect on the cost.

Frustratingly for Mazda’s EV offering, the sums don’t add up as neatly as I’d like them to. The MX-30 EV is available in one top-spec trim, the E35 Astina, which wears a before-on-roads cost (MSRP) of $65,490.

This places it in the same league as the Hyundai Kona electric Highlander ($66,000), Kia Niro EV S ($67,490), and Tesla Model 3 Standard Range + which just had a significant price cut ($59,900).

To make things worse for our fledging Mazda EV, it has a WLTP-rated range of just 200km (or 225km using the ADR method)! There’s no two ways about it; this is pitiful in the face of the aforementioned rivals, all of which offer ranges in excess of 420km when measured against the same standard. Even the much cheaper base-model Nissan Leaf ($49,990) offers 270km of range.

You can’t not factor this in with an EV purchase, particularly in Australia where grand distances between cities essentially rules out any intercity trips for the MX-30 EV.

The brand is hoping this car’s funky and innovative design cues, which we’ll talk about in the next part of this review, will win the hearts of city-slickers, but the MX-30 is not lacking on the standard equipment front, either.

Stuff you’ll get out of the box includes 18-inch alloy wheels, an 8.8-inch multimedia screen (which, like this car’s CX-30 and Mazda3 siblings is a non-touch unit, controlled through a central dial), Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch semi-digital dash cluster, Bose 12-speaker premium audio, built-in sat-nav, head-up display, semi leather synthetic interior trim, full LED exterior lighting, a holographic head-up display, single-zone climate control with its own 7.0-inch touch panel controller, heated front seats, as well as keyless entry with push-start ignition.

The MX-30 has some unique interior materials, and I’m not sure why more EVs don’t have a full-size domestic power socket, as this car does under the centre console at the front. Handy for when you need to charge household devices larger than a phone on-the-go (hair-curling tongs perhaps?). There are a few spec omissions, however. Dual-zone climate, power seat adjust, and a wireless phone charger are chief among the missing.

While there have been a number of spec changes or additions with this update, even more tweaks have happened under the skin.

All versions of the bZ4X now make more power and torque. The AWD’s dual electric motor set-up now has a total system output of 252kW (+92kW) and 438Nm (+101Nm).

Like the pre-update version, the bZ4X AWD offers 'X-Mode' off-road drive modes, crawl control, as well as downhill assist control. However with 20-inch alloy wheels as standard, I doubt these will be taken off the beaten track very often, if at all.

The MX-30 has an electric motor on the front axle with a single-speed reduction-gear transmission. It produces low-sounding figures of 107kW and 271Nm of torque, which is less than most of its rivals, although it has more power and less torque than the equivalently sized (but much cheaper) MG ZS EV.

Although these power figures don’t look as impressive as rivals, it’s worth remembering that the MX-30 has much less weight to carry around, so when it comes to driving it’s a much better story than it appears. More on that later.

The MX-30 offers three levels of regenerative braking, controlled through the wheel-mounted paddle-shifters, a necessary touch, and one that offers decent feedback on how your driving style is affecting range, via the dash and multimedia screen.

Another big under-the-skin change with this update is Toyota has fitted the bZ4X line-up with a larger 74.7kWh lithium-ion battery pack.

As a result this EV has more range. The AWD now offers up to 517km of WLTP claimed range (up from 411km) with an official energy consumption figure of 16.0kWh/100km.

During my largely urban testing over the Christmas break I saw an average energy consumption of 14.4kWh/100km. In fact, on one particular trip into the city with minimal traffic I saw an average energy consumption of 10.5kWh/100km. This is incredibly low for an all-wheel drive EV and almost Tesla-like.

Using my as-tested energy consumption figure, the bZ4X AWD has a theoretical total range of 518km.

The Type 2/CCS combination charge port remains on the left-hand front wheel arch which is fine because it’s kerbside, but at some public charging stations it can be hard to connect the cable without having it run up against the front bumper.

Speaking of charging, the maximum AC charging rate has now been upped all the way from 11kW to 22kW, which is a fantastic update. This now allows for a 10 to 100 per cent charge in 3.5 hours.

While peak DC fast-charging unfortunately is still capped at 150kW, Toyota claims it can remain at a higher charge rate for longer now thanks to reworked battery thermal technology.

A fast charge from 10 to 80 per cent is now meant to take 45 minutes. It would be good to see quicker charging because many of this car’s rivals are faster and this can make a world of a difference during long road trips.

The MX-30 has some advantages here, in that its tiny (35.5kWh to be precise) lithium-ion battery pack means it charges up pretty quickly. The downside? It’s not as quick as it could be, and its efficiency leaves a little to be desired.

As already discussed at length, this small battery means a very short range – between 200 and 224km depending on which standard you want to go by, and the MX-30 is claimed to consume 18.5kWh of energy on the combined cycle.

This is disappointing because not only is the claim higher than rivals like the Kona electric and Nissan Leaf, but in reality, I couldn’t best it with predominantly city driving, as I have previously been able to in all its rivals. Over some 250km of testing I managed a dash-reported 18.9kWh/100km.

The MX-30 EV takes a European-standard Type 2 CCS charger, the most popular kind in Australia, and will charge up at a rate of 50kW on DC or 6.6kW on AC.

It would have been nice to see that boosted to at least 7.2kW AC to be a bit more competitive on AC charging speed. For a car that will need to be charged frequently, even a 10-minute difference in charging time is important. While 50kW DC is about right for a battery pack this size, I assume there will be cooling issues pushing that to 100kW+ as the Hyundai Kona electric and Tesla Model 3 with nearly twice the battery size are capable of.

Mazda estimates a charge time of 36 minutes on DC, three hours on a three-phase AC charger, or nine hours from a ~2.4kW wall outlet. I charged my MX-30 a single time before returning it, from about 10 – 80 per cent, with it maxing out at around 50kW. It charged in less than 40 minutes, however, as promised.

The bZ4X AWD was never a slow car to begin with but the added oomph is welcome.

While it's not overtly noticeable in everyday driving, when you mash the throttle at the lights you're pinned back in the seat a lot more than before.

Despite this, it still doesn’t feel like this car wants to be driven quickly. If you drive with a docile right foot, the bZ4X is a supremely comfortable vehicle that’s relaxing and easy to drive.

There are a number of regenerative braking modes to select from by using the steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters, but none of them offer a one-pedal driving mode. This means you need to use the brake pedal to come to a complete stop.

As a result, this car’s driving experience is more like a combustion or hybrid vehicle, like the RAV4. This can make the transition to an EV easier if you’ve never driven one before.

The steering feel in the bZ4X has a noticeable weight and heft to it which feels nice when you’re zipping around on urban streets. It also feels like the steering wheel is actually connected to the wheels rather than the overly assisted and light steering systems in some of its rivals.

Where the added steering heft can feel a touch annoying is when you’re doing a tight parking manoeuvre. This car is longer than you think, meaning you may need to do three-point turns more often.

Speaking of parking, the bZ4X’s surround-view camera system is detailed and high-resolution, which is a great peace of mind. The semi-autonomous park assist is also fantastic as it can detect and park the vehicle within painted lines, rather than just slot it between two parked vehicles.

Adding to the comfort factor is this car’s ride, which is a major highlight. Despite the large 20-inch alloy wheels, the suspension does a great job at softening bigger bumps and small road imperfections.

There is little that upsets the interior ambience in this car, making it a serene place to be regardless of where you’re travelling. For an EV you’d expect more tyre and wind noise given there’s no engine to drown the noise out, but Toyota has seemingly done a great job of insulating the cabin and choosing suitable tyres.

Usually, it’s easier here to talk about how electric cars are different from their combustion counterparts, or how they are great for an electric car. In the case of the MX-30, however, it’s just a great car to drive.

I’ll admit, I didn’t expect this little EV to match, much less exceed the driving experience of its CX-30 sibling, but it was a pleasant surprise to find out how great it was.

It turns out that having a much smaller battery, and therefore a much lower kerb weight than most EVs, means the MX-30 feels light, agile, and rapid compared to all of its rivals, which goes some way to making up for its lesser outputs.

In fact, I had no trouble with the motor at all, with the MX-30 feeling faster and more responsive than the Hyundai Kona electric or the Kia Niro EV.

Mazda’s handling prowess is also on full show here, with the smooth and accurate steering allowing me to point this little SUV with remarkable accuracy. The steering tune is lighter than the Kona electric, but a bit more significant than the Kia Niro's. It emboldens you to have a bit of fun, and again, unlike rivals, Mazda’s suspension tune has your back.

It’s sporty enough to engage you, but not so firm that it sends tremors through the cabin, an impressive feat considering it has a less complex torsion bar rear. If anyone had asked me, I would have sworn it was multi-link all-round.

The whole experience feels very similar to helming the CX-30 or Mazda3, but I’d even say the MX-30 feels better over the front end, with less rough rebound than its siblings.

It also makes a cool noise. Mazda have given the MX-30 an artificial tone, plumbed through the speakers, and unlike the science-fiction hum generated by the Hyundai group EVs, the Mazda’s is a warm drone, more reminiscent of a combustion engine.

To be clear here, the MX-30 is no Tesla Model 3. That car is seriously rapid, with mind-bending handling, although I will say there’s a certain poise and refinement to the way the Mazda drives. Even in the corners, it’s confidence inspiring, with the torque-vectoring magic built into the electric motor on full show.

Perhaps one of the reasons that this car is a tad less efficient than its rivals is its lack of weight, which would allow more energy to be fed back into the battery during regenerative braking. Or perhaps its regen braking modes are a bit too forgiving, either way it’s nice that the Mazda offers three easily controllable levels via the paddle-shifters. I even became a fan of the quaint analogue power dial, even if it does give you a bit less feedback than the sleek software suites in Hyundai Group or Tesla offerings.

The MX-30, then, hits an unexpected niche. The benefits of its smaller battery pack and a focus on handling make this car one of the best EVs to drive today, even if you’re restricted to city limits, and regular recharging.

Like all recently launched Mazdas, the MX-30 is packed full of advanced ‘i-Activesense’ safety gear. In terms of cutting-edge items, this includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, now with low-speed intersection assist as well as pedestrian and cyclist detection, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, blind-spot monitoring with active intervention, as well as front and rear cross traffic alert, with rear emergency braking.

The MX-30 also has the expected suite of electronic assistance but goes further to include torque vectoring and has a total of 10 airbags – a lot for a very small cabin. It also comes packed standard with front and rear parking sensors, as well as a 360-degree parking camera suite. It’s amongst the best safety suites in terms of pure features in the small SUV segment.

The MX-30 has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2020 standards.

As standard there is a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty which is fine but does not stand out for the segment anymore.

However, if you service at one of Toyota’s 260+ dealers around Australia when required, warranty coverage for the high-voltage battery can be extended all the way out to 10 years.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, and the first five services are capped at $180 each. While the pricing in classic Toyota fashion is competitive, the 12 month intervals aren’t (in the EV space). The standard is now closer to 24 months.

As part of the ownership package owners get Mode 2 and Mode 3 charging cables. The 'Toyota Go' loyalty programs also allows for the choice of a complimentary 7.0kW home charger or 12-month Chargefox subscription.

The MX-30 is covered by Mazda’s industry-standard five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the battery pack is covered by a separate eight-year promise, on par with its Korean rivals. Mazda includes roadside assist for the duration of the warranty.

The EV has service intervals of 12 months or 15,000km whichever occurs first, and a five-year service plan comes in at $1273.79, working out to an average of $254.76 a year. That’s getting close to Toyota levels of cheap servicing, and so it should, given electric cars (at least in theory) have much less to attend to when it comes service time.