Subaru Crosstrek vs Mazda CX-3

What's the difference?

It’s not perfect, in fact, the Crosstrek has a few factors that would probably turn off groups of buyers at a time, but Subaru knows its audience isn’t ‘everyone’.

Subaru customers aren’t trying to get their fuel efficiency below 4.5L/100km, nor find the car with the most luxurious interior. They’re looking for a practical Jack or Jill of all trades, which the Crosstrek does rather well for its segment.

Few small SUVs are as agreeable on rough and unsealed roads without sacrificing suburban comfort, while its features list is practical and provides plenty for the money.

Unfortunately, the hybrid system is a little underwhelming, and if it’s the main draw of the Crosstrek for you, it could be worth considering the less expensive ($38,590) Hybrid L or even a hybrid rival like the Toyota Corolla Cross or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

If the all-round ability of the Crosstrek is the draw, however, the non-hybrid L is still an excellent offering and doesn’t use a lot more fuel than the Hybrid - plus it’s several grand cheaper at $41,490.

The Crosstrek is great for active people who need a bit of flexibility in one car but for the vast majority, the hybrid probably isn’t the sweet spot in the range. However, that won’t hinder the Crosstrek as an overall model, its popularity is already proven, and the option of a Hybrid puts Subaru a little closer to the eventual necessity of electrification.

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the new Crosstrek looks an awful lot like its a development of the Subaru XV.

Which, given the latter’s popularity, is a very good thing.

While there are a lot of similarities, especially when it comes to some of the more rugged elements, the Crosstrek still manages to look quite new.

It’s rugged without having too many ‘busy’ design elements and it even looks at home in inner-city suburbs. 

Of course, its raised body and cladding are mostly for practical reasons, but it gives the small SUV an adventurous aesthetic that separates it from city-focused rivals.

As essentially a high-riding development of the Impreza hatch, its size and proportions also make it look more like a ‘big car’ than a small SUV.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

Practicality is pretty much a staple of Subaru as a brand, so it should be a huge surprise that it feels that way from the driver’s seat.

The interior doesn’t look futuristic, but it does look functional. 

For example, even though the centre of the dash is all screen - and we love buttons for climate controls around here - the controls for air conditioning and temperature are at least always present on the screen, no sub-menus needed.

The phone charger is large enough for even very tall phones (looking at you, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, pictured), and it’s out of the way to minimise extra digital distraction.

The steering wheel’s buttons, while many, are all clear and simple, as is the iPad-like icon layout on the multimedia screen.

Storage in the front is miles ahead of the rear seats, a large central bin with two cupholders, a big glove box, and decent space for water bottles in the door cards. In the rear, two central cupholders in the armrest and a small space in the door.

But there is a decent amount of space for an adult to sit in the rear, even if the sides of the roof are a little close to the head. It’s a little like the front, where the seats are supportive and easy to adjust to a comfortable position.

Further back, the boot space is a relatively small 315 litres, though its slightly larger than the 291L the petrol versions come with - that extra space likely swallowed by a spare tyre in the petrol versions, as opposed to the smaller batteries taking up some space in the hybrids.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

Upon updating the Mazda CX-3, the Evolve variant is now a $32,100 ask before on-road costs, which is $900 more than before. It’s a little step up from the $30,370 entry price of the Pure, but falls well short of the top-spec Akari’s $38,890 sticker price.

The CX-3 range now comes with updated autonomous emergency braking and adaptive cruise control, with the Evolve specifically scoring new fog lights and keyless entry.

The Evolve also comes with black machined 18-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim and front parking sensors.

This is all on top of the CX-3’s standard kit which includes a leather-wrapped gear shift knob, handbrake handle and steering wheel, keyless start, an 8.0-inch multimedia display, wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto plus LED headlights, daytime running lights and tail-lights.

For its segment, the CX-3 isn’t cheap. The Evolve grade is more expensive than pretty much the entire line-ups of rivals like the Kia Stonic or Hyundai Venue, and its price somewhat lines up with the newer, hybrid-powered Toyota Yaris Cross.

But there’s more to the CX-3 than just a list of features.

This is perhaps the part of the review you’re most interested in - as well as the following sections on efficiency and maybe driving - if the ‘Hybrid’ part of the Crosstrek Hybrid S’ name brought you here.

Like its design and interior, the engine will be familiar to anyone who has owned or driven a relatively recent Subaru - a 2.0-litre flat-four petrol engine good for 110kW/196Nm - which means it makes a little less than the standard petrol variant’s 115kW.

However, the electric motor is capable of its own 12kW/66Nm outputs, though Subaru doesn’t supply a claimed total maximum for the whole powertrain.

Drive is transferred to all four wheels - it is a Subaru after all - via a seven-step continuously variable transmission (CVT).

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

Subaru claims the Crosstrek Hybrid will sip 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle, which isn’t enough to blow anyone away, even when you take into account the extra fuel needed for permanent all-wheel drive. The AWD Corolla Cross Hybrid comes with a claimed 4.4L/100km.

Compare this to the 8.5L/100km reading the Crosstrek returned after our time with the car, mostly with a (somewhat unkind) mix of inner-city and semi-rural backroad driving, and it’s clear the Crosstrek isn’t one of the most frugal cars in its class.

More highway driving would certainly have lowered the figure - we’ve achieved 8.0-litres on previous testing with a non-hybrid Crosstrek - but perhaps being top of the charts for efficiency isn’t necessarily what Subaru buyers are looking for.

Of course, the Crosstrek Hybrid S employs a couple of features to avoid using fuel where it can be avoided, such as auto stop-start and its (relatively mild) electric system taking over when mostly coasting or the engine isn’t required.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

Two things stand out after a short stint behind the wheel of the Crosstrek Hybrid, and both become more cemented over time.

The first is that the ‘Hybrid’ part of the ‘Crosstrek Hybrid S’ isn’t quite as prominent in its real-world impact as it is in its name.

The 110kW engine doesn’t feel like it’s being massively helped along by any electric assistance, and the electric motor is very rarely doing the work by itself, as you’d find in any hybrid from Toyota or Honda.

That’s a shame, because the Crosstrek could do with a little extra oomph, if not for getting up to speed then for avoiding thrashy engine sounds under acceleration.

The CVT, while not necessarily detrimental to its performance, doesn’t help with that.

But balancing that out is a chassis and platform that’s engaging and predictable - and that’s predictable as a good thing - making the Crosstrek pleasant to pilot.

Its controls like steering and braking are nicely weighted for low speeds, commuting, and for more spirited driving, while the suspension and chassis handles surfaces from smooth suburban roads, to city tram tracks, to unsealed roads with ease, soaking up bumps and shakes nicely.

If you’re noticing a theme in this review, it’s that Subaru doesn’t seem to be chasing any ‘best at’ metrics in favour of giving the Crosstrek the ability to do a range of different driving and being at least satisfactory in any given area.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The Mazda CX-3 is technically unrated by ANCAP, though only because its original maximum five-star rating expired after seven years. While this means it easily passes many of ANCAP’s main criteria for safety (and strict Australian Design Rules - ADRs - to be able to be sold here), the CX-3 is missing some recent, more complex safety features.

Not everything is standard across the line-up, either. The Evolve misses out on adaptive headlights, a surround-view parking camera and traffic sign recognition. The base Pure variant also misses out on a front parking sensor.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other key features like seven airbags, dual-front and front-side plus curtain airbags spanning the sides. The CX-3 also has ABS and emergency braking with forward pedestrian detection and rear cross-traffic alert.

There’s lane departure warning, forward obstruction warning, blind-spot monitoring and a driver attention alert for those times you might miss something or - hopefully not often - are distracted.

All these systems are programmed well to minimise interference while driving, making the CX-3 refreshingly trusting of the driver to actually do the job of driving.

The Crosstrek is covered by Subaru’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, with servicing intervals coming up every 12 months or 15,000km under Subaru’s five-year capped-price servicing.

Subaru also adds 12 months of free roadside assistance.

This is all fairly standard in the industry, though some brands like Kia and MG offer seven-year warranties, or there’s Mitsubishi with a 10-year warranty (even if it requires certain conditions to be met during the decade).

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.