Ssangyong Korando vs Chery C5

What's the difference?

SsangYong’s Korando diesel might not break the mould in any meaningful area, but it certainly has its place as a no frills, feature-rich SUV.

However, buyers that stay in the inner city should probably forgo the diesel in favour of the petrol Korando which costs less to buy, and at this stage, less to fill up.

The diesel engine is a little undercooked and the styling is far from exciting, but the long equipment list, sensible pricing and lengthy warranty period should at least give buyers deadset on a Hyundai Tucson, Mazda CX-5 or Nissan Qashqai pause.

Can a new name, fresh face and suspension update save Chery’s sleek SUV coupe from the ignominy of being one of the least pleasant options in its ultra-competitive class?

Sadly, not enough has been done for us to recommend the new C5.

As an affordable, stylish, roomy and zoomy SUV, the Chery definitely provides showroom appeal, especially given the decent warranty.

But, with lots of little niggles still present to distract and frustrate, the C5 is far from A1. Plus, with prices now creeping up, it doesn’t even have the cheap pricing of the old Omoda 5 to get it over the line.

Heading into 2026, Chery still needs to do better than this.

At first glance, the SsangYong Korando might look a bit derivative or even bland, blending elements of the Kia Seltos and Hyundai Tucson.

But did you know the SsangYong Korando predates both aforementioned models? Yep, the fourth-generation broke cover in early 2019, about six months ahead of the Seltos and more than 12 months before the latest Tucson surfaced.

Just because it was first in however, doesn’t mean it is still the best dressed.

To our eye, the Korando is just missing that X factor in aesthetics to really help it stand out from the crowd.

From a distance, it just looks like any other SUV, and isn’t all that distinctive from its rivals.

Sure, the SsangYong grille, sharp front end and foglight arrangement are distinctive enough, but maybe it’s the white of our press car that makes it just seem a little … ordinary.

In profile, the Korando is even more inconspicuous, and even its unique wheels and thick C-pillars do nothing to grab your attention.

The rear end of the Korando might be its best angle, with stand-out tail-light graphics, a chrome centre strip and chunky bumper combining for a little visual pizazz.

Inside, the Korando continues the ho-hum theme with a standard, but lacklustre, dashboard layout and cabin materials.

There’s leather and gloss-black bits to liven things up, but from the centre stack design to the seat inserts, there’s just nothing standout or special about the interior of the Korando.

Don’t get us wrong, we don’t hate the way the Korando looks and feels, its just a bit too Clark Kent and not enough Superman for our tastes.

But if you wanted a mid-size SUV that is inoffensive and blends into the background, this could the car for you.

The new and narrower nose treatment is better, banishing the Omoda 5’s insectoid face straight into the bin. As an example of coupe-SUV design, the unaltered silhouette remains contemporary and is a defining signature for the series.

But, as before, the C5’s styling is hobbled by its narrow-gutted track width and highish (at 184mm) ground clearance, that give it a muffin-top and tippy-toed appearance respectively from most angles. Flashbacks to a Holden VN Commodore. Stance be damned.

Let’s look at the newcomer’s dimensions, compared to the Tiggo 4 for perspective: length is 4351mm (plus 44mm), width is 1831mm (+6mm), height is 1662mm (+2mm) and wheelbase is identical at 2610mm.

Still, there’s a positively Pollyanna-esque perspective to be gained here as well, since the C5’s extra size translates to a biggish small SUV inside a cabin that seems stylishly minimalistic. Or fairly basic. It all depends on your point of view.

Let’s take a closer look.

Measuring 4450mm long, 1870mm wide, 1629mm tall and with a 2675mm wheelbase, the Korando serves as SsangYong’s mid-size SUV competitor against the likes of the Toyota RAV4, Mazda CX-5, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson and Mitsubishi Outlander.

There’s no denying though, that the Korando sits on the smaller end of the mid-size SUV spectrum, being shorter in overall size and wheelbase than even the CX-5 (which we thought was just about big enough for a small family of three).

In fact, the Korando sizes up much closer to something like the new-generation Nissan Qashqai and Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross – two models which are classed on the larger end of the small SUV spectrum.

After spending a week with the car, we’d argue the Korando feels much more like a small SUV than a mid-sizer.

In the front seats, there is plenty of space for occupants and there is heaps of adjustability in the seats and steering wheel to get comfortable.

Storage solutions include door pockets, cupholders and an underarm cubby, but the tray found just in front of the shifter could use a raised lip or grippier surface so your phone and wallet don’t slide around while driving.

The second row is also plenty spacious, with enough leg-, head- and shoulder-room for our six-foot-tall (183cm) frame, even behind the driver’s seat in our desired position.

Of course, the middle seat is a little compromised thanks to the transmission tunnel eating in the footwell and the slightly higher seating position, but it will do in a pinch.

And in the second row, occupants are treated to a bottle holder in the door, a fold-down armrest (in lieu of the middle seat), a 12-volt charging socket and back-seat map pockets, but a big omission is the lack of air vents – which could be a dealbreaker for some families.

The second-row does offer more room than expected of a car this size, but opening the boot reveals how SsangYong has managed to make the rear seats more comfortable – it has sacrificed storage volume.

The boot will swallow 407 litres with all seats in place, which is smaller than the Mazda CX-5, Nissan Qashqai and only two litres more than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

Fold the seats down and volume swells to just 1104L.

Don’t get us wrong, you’ll still be able to fit your weekly groceries in the boot or a full-size pram, but it will be a stretch for both.

Three things struck me the moment I stepped inside the C5.

Firstly, though the silhouette suggests a low-slung car, the tall stance means getting in and out isn’t a drama at all, with the seats being up high enough for this to deserve its SUV/crossover status.

Secondly, the Chery emits a somewhat repellent plastic off-gas odour, a bit like a cheap toy. The smell never goes away. Perhaps it was just our test car? Unlikely though, as it reminds me of pre-2000s Kias and Hyundais.

And in stark contrast, thirdly, there’s an arresting elegance to the dashboard’s minimalist layout and presentation. Nothing’s changed visually and nothing needed to.

Let’s concentrate on the many positive points first.

There’s plenty of space around you for a comparatively small and narrow SUV, including ample legroom and head room for your 178cm tester front and back. It doesn't feel cramped at all.

Finding the ideal driving position is easy, with most of the (available) switches and controls where you’d need them to be without having to stretch to reach. Helping things out here is an adjustable steering wheel for rake as well as reach. Unlike in an MG ZS.

The dash layout looks great, given that this car is of a 2022 vintage, with the large, twin 10.25-inch integrated displays for both the electronic instrumentation and the multimedia system seamlessly presented. Both are fairly clear and easy to work out and operate. And, despite being an older-generation vehicle (it’s now well into year four of production), the instruments still look fresh.

And though the C5 runs a software-based operating system for vehicle functions, climate, audio, multimedia and other settings, the few buttons provided are well integrated and mostly work logically.

Below the touchscreen is a row of haptic switches for the main heating and cooling elements, meaning just one touch is necessary and with no complicated and time-consuming sub-menus to navigate. That's good.

You do need to dive into sub-menus for some drive settings and modes, though, and that's disappointing, but at least the C5’s is not as complicated as some others we’ve experienced of late.

Other plus points include excellent ventilation and loads of storage, including a big old glovebox, a cavernous centre console bin, a vast lower area to hide things on, deep cupholders and a ‘wall’ to lean two phones or a tablet while still being visible for the driver to glance at, with one side providing wireless charging on the Ultimate grade.

Along with pleasant cloth seats that are surprisingly comfortable, all show a reassuring degree of thoughtfulness.

Additionally, the poor side and rear vision is at least aided by large side mirrors and a crisp reverse-camera views.

However, there are some serious downsides too, starting with the C5’s aforementioned phone/tablet wall. The rubber backing in our test car was misshapen and dog-eared, undermining the otherwise exemplary build quality.

Until you learn its weird ways, the gear shifter can be unfathomable. It looks like it would operate as per a regular T-bar, but pressing the side button to engage Drive or Reverse instead locks them out, meaning the uninitiated will inevitably find themselves panicking manoeuvring in traffic with impatient drivers wondering why a Chery is blocking the road during a cheeky three-point turn. Embarrassing and, yes, super frustrating.

In the Ultra at least, the lofty front passenger seat has no height adjustment. The digital radio did not work for the entire week we had the C5. Maybe it was just our car, but even in inner Melbourne, reception proved elusive.

And the touchscreen-based secondary climate settings that aren’t supported by physical buttons are a stretch away, including temperature adjustment, meaning these and other items are arranged for left-hand-drive access.

This means it is fiddly to operate, as concentration is not on the road ahead, resulting in the driver monitor sounding off, leading to more frustration. An unvirtuous circle of distraction ensues, highlighting the folly of software-based vehicle systems that have not been tailored to Australian road conditions. Fail.

But nothing is as aggravating as the Chery’s voice control system. Like we said earlier, when turned on, it mishears or misunderstands words to almost a comical degree… if it wasn’t so constantly intrusive. As with paranoid and/or trigger-happy ADAS warnings, you end up switching off such irritating tech. Which beggars the question: what is their point?

Moving to the back seat, things look up again, with sufficient space for most smaller families to settle into.

The bench is fine, offering adequate comfort for shorter journeys. Legroom is generous, helped out by room for boots to tuck underneath the front cushion. And most amenities are present for a base model car, including a folding armrest with two cupholders (again, unlike in an MG ZS), as well as one-touch electric windows, overhead grab handles, coat hooks, decent size door bins, a USB port and face level ventilation.

All those go towards making the C5 well-packaged, small family transport.

Further back, Chery has managed to liberate an extra 10 litres of cargo capacity compared to the old Omoda 5, so 360 litres is available – which is not bad for a small SUV. That rises to 1075L in two-seater mode.

It’s also a practical and easy boot to use, with a space saver spare wheel.

In its latest guise, Chery’s small SUV coupe range has been reduced to just two grades, Urban and Ultimate.

This one’s the Urban. At $29,990 drive-away at the time of publishing, it undercuts the Ultimate by $5000, but does cost $2000 more than the old base Omoda 5 FX. And the competition is becoming fiercer by the month.

Consider, for example, the redesigned and vastly-improved MG ZS, facelifted Jolion and all-new Suzuki Fronx, as well the less expensive if smaller rivals such as the Mahindra 3XO, Kia Stonic, Hyundai Venue, Mazda CX-3, Nissan Juke and Chery’s own Tiggo 4.

Frankly, the Omoda 5 needed to improve.

To that end, the C5 ditches the old torsion beam rear suspension for a multi-link independent set-up that promises better comfort and control. That’s a big step in the right direction.

And while long-term durability and reliability remain unknowns with such gearboxes, a switch from a continuously variable transmission (CVT) to a six-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT) may be a nod to driving enthusiasts. Let’s see about that.

The entry-level Ultra includes a nicely integrated electronic display and central touchscreen at 10.25 inches apiece, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, DAB+ digital radio, rear air vents, powered folding mirrors, noise-cutting acoustic front door glass and 17-inch alloys.

There’s also “Hello, Chery” voice control, that can thankfully be silenced as our example’s inability to differentiate 'Chery' from 'Cher', 'chair' and 'care' fast became a pain in you-know-where, since it insisted on constantly butting in.

Seven airbags and a decent level of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are also standard – more on those in the safety section below.

For the record, the $35K-drive-away Ultimate adds better audio, a powered tailgate, heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, a 360-degree monitor, sunroof with sunshade, wireless charger, imitation leather, bigger wheels and more.

However, they are also necessary sweeteners against sophisticated rivals like the Toyota Yaris Cross Hybrid, Mazda CX-30, Subaru Crosstrek, Hyundai Kona, Nissan Qashqai and Renault Duster.

More importantly for some, the closely related and virtually identically sized Chery Tiggo 4 costs several thousand dollars less, and mostly matches the C5’s spec at each corresponding grade, undermining the newcomer's value. A strange own-goal, Chery.

Oh well. For some buyers, this swoopy crossover is all about image. At least the facelift addresses the old Omoda 5’s odd appearance from some angles.

Powering the SsangYong Korando Ultimate Diesel is 1.6-litre turbo-diesel engine.

Peak power is 100kW at 4000rpm, while maximum torque of 324Nm is available from 1500-2500rpm.

Those outputs are well down on rival cars, which range from 137kW/416Nm in the Tucson and Sportage, to 140kW/450Nm in the CX-5 – though competitors all use larger engines.

Drive is sent to all four wheels via a six-speed automatic transmission, making the diesel-powered Korando the only SsangYong mid-size SUV that is not front-wheel drive.

SsangYong also includes a drive-mode selector, with functionality for Normal, Sport and Winter settings.

The C5 is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol engine, delivering 108kW of power at 5500rpm and 210Nm of torque from 1750-4000rpm.

As part of the MY25 facelift, the Chery swaps out the old Omoda 5’s CVT for a six-speed dual-clutch transmission, complete with a handy manual mode. It drives the front wheels only.

Tipping the scales at 1462kg (kerb), the C5 Ultra offers a power-to-weight ratio of 73.9kW/tonne – which is slightly less than, say, a Haval Jolion, but quite a bit behind a Mazda CX-3.

With a slight helping hand from a strong northerly wind, we managed to record a 0-100km/h sprint time of 9.9 seconds. This figure suggests the Chery feels faster than it is.

Official fuel consumption figures for the SsangYong Korando Ultimate Diesel are pegged at 6.4 litres per 100km, while emissions are 170 grams of CO2 per 100km.

In our week with the car, we managed an average of 8.2L/100km, with our driving primarily focused on short, inner-city journeys.

While the Korando is relatively frugal on diesel compared with some its larger and more powerful rivals, keep in mind that diesel prices are much higher than petrol at the moment.

The C5’s combined average fuel consumption figure is 6.9L/100km, for a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 160 grams/km. And that’s on regular 91 RON standard unleaded. Topping the 51-litre petrol tank should result in nearly 740km of range between refills.

During our week with the Chery, we managed 9.0L/100km, which is very disappointing, though that did include highway and performance driving.

If the brief for the Korando is to be easy and unintimidating to drive, then SsangYong has nailed it.

From the driver’s seat, the Korean mid-size SUV makes you feel comfortable and confident, and the steering – while a little on the numb and light side – is communicative enough at slower speeds around town.

The diesel engine as found in our test car, however, does feel lacklustre, even if just accelerating to 60km/h.

The asthmatic powertrain struggles even more at freeway speeds, and coming up to speed at an onramp really highlights how gutless the 100kW/324Nm engine is.

However, the flip side of all this is that the Korando doesn’t really do anything unexpected or surprising.

In the same way you might order a salad for brunch, the Korando’s engine feels just about adequate enough to keep you going and is a safe choice for those that might not be all that adventurous.

However, there is a drive-mode selector on offer to change things from Normal to Sport or Winter.

Switch it over to Sport mode, and things liven up with the Korando feeling more responsive, but we can’t help but feel this mode should be the default tune.

One oddity we did note is that switching from Normal mode to Sport requires a turn of the dial to the right, but turning the dial to the left does not return it to the default setting.

In fact, turning the dial to the left does nothing, and to get it back into normal mode, it’s another turn to the right.

All of this is to say, the ergonomics of the Korando feel a little half-baked, and a little more time in development could have ironed out these issues.

Chery has made some pretty fundamental changes underneath, so we had higher hopes of the C5 compared to the preceding Omoda 5. However, expectations ought to be tempered here.

Let’s begin with the Chinese SUV’s performance.

After a moment’s hesitation, the C5 feels punchy from the get-go, with a decent amount of muscle as the revs rise. Throttle response is brisk, even at higher speeds. And the brakes do a great job. This is quite the rapid little runabout.

Some of that initial lag is down to the dual-clutch transmission, since it needs time for the turbo to spool up. Once sorted, it shifts swiftly and smoothly, and without delay. Only the aforementioned gear selector complication will catch out new drivers, as the operation is needlessly complicated.

But the engine is never really quiet, and can even feel coarse when extended under hard acceleration, betraying this Chery’s station as a cheap SUV. And the stop/start tech is especially jerky.

The steering, meanwhile, is a mix of disgruntle and delight.

When driving on the motorway, it can feel lumpy, with the driver-assist system tugging away endlessly at the wheel. The sudden jolts make it feel like a pinball as the vehicle feels like it is ricocheting off the white lines. Such constant correction is both tiring and irritating, leading to fatigue and, if your fuse is really short, aggravation.

For steering smoothness or linearity, you need to dive into a sub menu and opt out of several ADAS modes. Or otherwise pull over and wonder why Chinese car companies especially seem to have such disdain for Australian drivers. If this sounds like a nightmare, the C5 is not for you.

Furthermore, there’s no point choosing a steering setting. Comfort is light enough for easy driving and weighty enough for the driver to feel in control, but feedback and feel are absent. And selecting Sport just adds needless heft and makes it all feel way too heavy.

Now, that said, the C5 offers some dynamic compensation, and likely courtesy of its multi-link suspension upgrade.

At higher speeds, the steering, for instance, is pleasingly direct and precise, meaning it turns exactly where you choose it to. The handling feels controlled and the tyres grip well, for some unintentional scrappy fun through really tight corners, to a certain extent anyway. It’s a side to the Chery the Omoda 5 never seemed capable of delivering.

But, inevitably, this comes at a price, and that is a busy and at times agitated ride, with the suspension failing to soak up bumps and irregularities on anything other than smooth roads, despite its new-found independence, adding to further fatigue. For the record, our test car rode on 215/60R17 Giti tyres.

Would higher-quality rubber help fix this? If you’re buying a sub-$30K Chery SUV, would you even care? Basically, unless you enjoy the occasional hoon, the C5 lacks dynamic sophistication as well as sufficient Australian road tuning. Much like its predecessor. Such a letdown.

Considering that it is merely a facelift with a new badge, the Chery C5 conveniently adopts the preceding Omoda 5’s five-star ANCAP crash-test rating.

Note that was conducted in 2022 using earlier performance parameters compared to today.

Anyway, there is little doubt that Chery has done its homework here, with a host of advanced driver-assist systems (ADAS) being fitted.

These include autonomous emergency braking (AEB), forward collision warning, emergency lane keeping, lane departure warning and prevention, blind spot detection, lane change assist, rear cross-traffic alert and braking, adaptive cruise control with traffic jam assist, traffic sign recognition, speed control assist, a driver monitor and auto high beams.

This cannot be understated: most of this ADAS tech requires Australian road tuning, because they interfere and distract to the point of being a nuisance.

Note that the AEB (encompassing pedestrian, cyclist and back-over braking) operates from 4km/h to 65km/h, whilst the car-to-car braking is between 4km/h and 150km/h. The lane-support systems work between 60km/h and 150km/h.

Seven airbags are present (including a front-centre and full head/curtain coverage but no rear side airbags), as are anti-lock brakes, stability control and traction control systems.

Finally, a pair of ISOFIX child-seat latch points and a trio of hooks for tether straps across the rear seat are also part of the C5 package.

Like all new SsangYongs sold in Australia, the Korando comes with a seven year/unlimited kilometre warranty – matching the likes of Kia and falling short of the industry-leading 10-year warranty offered by Mitsubishi.

Scheduled service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, which matches the industry standard.

The first five years of maintenance will set owners back $1580 or $316 each.

However, keep in mind there will be additional service items that need to be addressed such as a urea fill ($51.32 every 10,000km), a brake fluid change ($121.44 every 24 months) and a kit-fuel filter ($146.14 every 25 months or 30,000km).

SsangYong lists the prices of all its services on its website.

Very competitive if not quite as class leading as the conditional Nissan, Mitsubishi and MG 10-year warranty, the C5 comes with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Chery also offers seven years/105,000km of capped-price servicing and a year’s free roadside assistance, though up to seven years is available should owners choose to have their vehicle maintained at an authorised dealer during that period.

Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km, and cost $280 per visit for the first five, extending to nearly $370 and $290 for the final two.