Kia Sorento vs Skoda Kamiq

What's the difference?

The Kia Sorento GT-Line PHEV is a sumptuously equipped seven-seater that delivers comfort, tech and an easy-going drive. It presents well on the surface, and for the right buyer (one who can make the most of its plug-in capabilities ) it could be a smart, low-emissions option for family life.

But for all its polish, it doesn’t quite do enough to justify itself as the best Sorento in the range. The electric-only driving range isn’t especially generous, and the higher price tag , combined with its lower towing capacity, may leave some families wondering whether the diesel variant is the more practical choice.

It’s not a bad car by any means, but the flagship GT-Line PHEV feels more like a stepping stone than a standout.

The Skoda Kamiq continues to be an overlooked gem. It’s cleverly designed and well equipped, even in base form, and what sets it apart from many other dull options in this segment is how fun it can be to drive.

Despite all of this and keen ownership terms it continues to account for a tiny number of sales in the segment, and I don’t think it’s destined to change as, value or not, its positioning remains the same in a small SUV space where it’s increasingly hard to stand out.

Still, for those who dare to choose something different, there’s a great little car to be found.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The Sorento looks exactly how a modern SUV should - confident, capable, and well-proportioned without feeling bulky. It wears its size well, delivering that commanding presence families often want in a seven-seater, without coming across as too aggressive.

I especially like the 19-inch alloy wheels as they suit the vehicle’s stance perfectly. I also like the striking LED lighting signatures front and rear, which really come to life after dark.

Step inside and the cabin strikes a neat balance between tech-forward and user-friendly. You’re greeted by dual 12.3-inch widescreen displays that make a strong first impression, but thankfully Kia hasn’t gone all-digital! You still get physical buttons and dials where they matter, making everything feel intuitive and easy to navigate.

Material quality is a highlight. There’s quilted Nappa leather upholstery, soft-touch surfaces throughout, and even a luxe suede headliner. These premium touches, coupled with the panoramic sunroof, lift the ambience and it's a cabin that feels genuinely upmarket, but not at the cost of family friendly functionality.

The Kamiq's design is distinctly European for better or worse, but it stands out from its crossover rivals by looking (and feeling) more hatchback than SUV.

If you’re wondering what’s changed for this update, I don’t blame you, the changes are very subtle. Looking closely will reveal a tweaked front bumper and a new rear diffuser, as well as progressive LED indicators.

The style of the two variants has also been subtly altered with new wheel choices and the increase in the use of gloss black on the Monte Carlo, but there are more distinct changes on the inside.

Each grade gets its own theme for the highlight trim across the dash reflected in the seats, and honestly I don’t miss the leather, cloth seats are back in in a big way, and in both grades here they’re pretty rad.

Other new features include a tweaked set of multimedia screens, with the base car maintaining a set of dials, and the larger unit re-working its touch-based shortcut buttons.

As usual, the digital dash treatment (courtesy of Volkswagen Group) is well above par in terms of customisation and information.

Ultimately then, it’s not too different from how it looked and felt before, but there’s certainly an argument to be made that it didn’t need to change. The Kamiq has always been a distinctive and well-appointed choice in this segment.

Space up front is generous, with excellent seat comfort thanks to wide seat bases, extendable under-thigh support and heating and ventilation. Getting in and out is easy, too, helped by wide door openings and a manageable 176mm ground clearance.

Storage throughout the cabin is thoughtful and abundant. Up front, there’s a large glovebox, a spacious centre console with a removable shelf, two cupholders, door bins with bottle holders, and a handy phone cubby beneath the dash.

The second row adds its own bottle holders and storage bins in each door, map pockets, four cupholders (including one cleverly placed on each door) and a removable floor shelf in front of the centre seat.

Even the third row isn’t forgotten, with a snack cubby and cupholder built into each wheel arch.

Tech-wise, the dual 12.3-inch displays look sharp, and the media system is intuitive and quick to respond. The instrument cluster isn’t particularly customisable, and I’m not a huge fan of the layout, but it displays the essentials clearly. You also get a head-up display, satellite navigation with over-the-air updates, and both wireless and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Charging options are solid across all three rows, with multiple USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket in the second row and boot, and a wireless charging pad up front.

The second row offers ample legroom, though headroom is slightly reduced due to the panoramic sunroof. The lack of a transmission tunnel is a win for middle seat comfort, and the bench is wide enough to accommodate three child seats side-by-side. There are three top-tether points and ISOFIX anchors on the outboard seats.

Comfort and convenience features in the second row include heated outboard seats, device pockets, directional air vents, and the same handy storage and charging options mentioned earlier. My son especially loves the retractable sunblinds and the cupholders built into the door handles as they’re easy to reach and super practical. I am, however, disappointed that there’s no separate climate control zone for this row.

As for the third row, it’s best treated as a sometimes seat for adults. Access is more child-sized, and amenities are limited, but you do get directional air vents and a fan control, which are definitely appreciated.

Boot space is tight with all three rows in use, at just 175L, but that was still enough for the odd errand during the week. Fold the third row down and you get a much more usable 604L. Both rows fold completely flat, making it easy to slide in larger items, and the GT-Line includes a powered tailgate and a rare full-size spare wheel for extra convenience.

Practicality is one of Skoda’s big selling points. The deal is this. Skoda models sit between entries in the Volkswagen range to provide strategic alternatives to its parent company's hero brand.

The Kamiq, for example, sits size-wise between the T-Cross and T-Roc, although once you’re in the cabin it feels bigger than both.

A nice low seating position makes the roof feel distant, while massive windows grant excellent visibility. It's easy for me (at 182cm) to find a nice seating position thanks to plenty of adjustability, although some might find it feels a bit more hatch-like than other SUVs in this class which have taller seating positions.

The overall spacious feeling in the front is boosted by ample storage, including pockets and bottle holders in the doors, a triple cupholder in the centre console, a large storage bay under the climate unit and a small armrest console box.

Unlike rivals in this space which are quick to offer synthetic leathers as you work your way up the range, even the top-spec Monte Carlo has seats clad in cloth trims.

While this might not be great if you have kids prone to spilling liquids, I think design-wise the car is better for it and certainly no less comfortable.

Also notable is the commitment to dials for the climate unit, and a change for this model year is the introduction of fan speed buttons so this function no longer needs to be controlled through the touchscreen.

Interestingly, dials only appear on the smaller of the two touchscreens available on the base Select, while the Monte Carlo’s larger screen only has touch-based volume controls.

The back seat is enormous, offering me leagues of knee room behind my own driving position and the roof remains almost as distant as it is in the front seats.

It also feels wide enough and has decent amenities, like dual USB-C sockets, adjustable rear air vents and dual-tiered pockets on the backs of the front seats. 

You also get a decent-sized bottle holder in the door and a drop-down centre armrest and the soft trims continue into the rear unlike some segment rivals which switch to hard plastic door cards.

The biggest downside for back seat passengers is the raised floor in the centre position (a platform restriction) which unfortunately makes it a bit squeezy for adults. Best leave this centre position for kids.

At 400 litres the boot punches well above its weight for this crossover segment, expanding to 1395L with the second row folded.

There’s a space-saver spare wheel under the floor and the Kamiq is also rated to tow, albeit at a limited 610kg or 630kg for an unbraked trailer and 1200kg or 1250kg (braked) for the Select and Monte Carlo, respectively.

In a quest to make its range more straightforward for buyers Skoda has simplified the Kamiq range down to two variants for 2025. 

The bad news is it’s no cheaper. Actually, it continues its march up the price-scale, now starting from $32,890, before on-road costs, or $33,990 drive-away for the new entry-point Select.

The good news is, for the money Skoda has packed in even more standard equipment.

The Select is only available with the smaller 1.0-litre 85TSI engine and offers a pretty comprehensive list of stuff, including LED headlights, 17-inch alloys, an 8.0-inch digital dash with an 8.25-inch multimedia touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, dual-zone climate and keyless entry with push-button start.

There's also a leatherbound steering wheel with cloth seat trim and manual adjust front seats, four USB-C outlets, heated and power folding wing mirrors with an auto-dimming rear view mirror. It also scores some upgraded kit for the active safety suite, as well as drive modes and paddle shifters.

You can also option this grade with the 'Signature Pack', which adds adaptive cruise control and ‘Park Assist’, an electric tailgate, 18-inch alloy wheels, the larger 10.25-inch multimedia touchscreen, tinted windows, carpet floor mats, interior ambient lighting, chrome exterior highlights, an alternate interior trim with suede highlights, and rear privacy glass.

At the top of the range is the new Monte Carlo which starts from $42,690, before on-roads, or $44,990 drive-away.

It scores a larger 1.5-litre four-cylinder 110TSI engine, and adds adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist with lane guidance and park assist to the safety suite.

Standard equipment also includes 18-inch alloys, upgraded ‘Matrix’ LED headlights, ‘Sport Chassis Control’ suspension, the larger 10.25-inch digital dash and 9.2-inch multimedia touchscreen, a panoramic sunroof, 10-speaker premium audio, heated front seats with a heated steering wheel, sports front seats with power adjust for the driver, as well as black highlights on the exterior trim and soft-touch carbon-look highlight trims on the inside.

Both grades get some of Skoda’s ‘simply clever’ features like an umbrella integrated into the driver’s door, a ticket holder on the windscreen, a washer funnel integrated into the reservoir and phone pockets on the backs of the front seats.

According to Skoda, the slightly higher prices for both grades this time around are offset by several thousand dollars of increased value in equipment.

On the flip side, though, some gear has been removed from the Kamiq range entirely, including leather seats, wireless phone charging, heated rear seats, and voice control for the multimedia system.

Does it represent value compared to its rivals? It’s relative. Yes, even the base version is more affordable than any Subaru Crosstrek, but you can’t get all-wheel drive, while a Mazda CX-3 can be had for just $26,950, before on-roads, but doesn’t offer the same level of base equipment.

The HR-V is more expensive and offers less gear for the money. It seems ever-increasing prices are a segment-wide problem.

The biggest challenge is new Chinese rivals. Haval’s Jolion is physically bigger and can be had in hybrid form for less money ($32,990 drive-away), while the Chery Omoda 5 ($27,990) and MG ZST (from $26,490) are cheaper and a size-up. It’s easy to see the temptation for mainstream buyers.

Powering this GT-Line variant is a plug-in hybrid system that pairs a 1.6-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine with a small electric motor and battery. Combined, the system delivers up to 195kW of power and 350Nm of torque, which is plenty to get this sizeable SUV moving with confidence.

It’s a part-time all-wheel-drive set-up with a lock mode for extra traction when needed, and it’s paired with a smooth-shifting six-speed automatic transmission.

Around town and on the highway, the power delivery feels seamless and refined, with the electric motor doing a nice job of smoothing out stop-start driving.

One key trade-off, however, is towing capacity. While the diesel Sorento can tow up to 2000kg braked, the PHEV’s figure drops to just 1010kg. That’s a significant reduction and could be a deal-breaker for families who regularly tow a camper, trailer or boat.

Two grades, two engine choices, doesn’t really get simpler.

The base Select is offered only with the smaller 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbocharged 85TSI engine (85kW/200Nm) paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission, driving the front wheels.

Meanwhile, the top-spec Monte Carlo is only offered with the larger 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbocharged 110TSI engine (110kW/250Nm). It is also paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch auto and also only drives the front wheels.

These engine options are notable in the segment as they are both lean turbo units in a sea of older naturally-aspirated engines, and while some will rightfully have reservations around dual-clutch automatics, they’re certainly snappier and more efficient than torque converters or dull CVTs.

The Sorento GT-Line PHEV offers a WLTP-rated electric-only driving range of up to 57km - not huge, but enough to cover most daily commutes or school runs without dipping into the petrol tank.

When driven as intended and regularly charged, it’s capable of a combined fuel consumption figure as low as 1.6L/100km and this is paired with a 67-litre fuel tank. That means you could go a seriously long time between fill-ups if you’re topping up the battery daily.

In my week of testing, which included a mix of highway stints and urban errands, the trip computer reported an average of 7.2L/100km.

That’s well above the official figure, but still pretty reasonable considering the type of driving I was doing.

Charging is simple enough. The Sorento uses a Type 2 charging port, and on a standard 3.3kW AC charger, the 14kWh battery can be charged from 15 to 95 per cent in about three hours and 26 minutes.

Kia includes a portable AC charger with this grade, which is a handy bonus for charging at home or on the go.

You’ll note Skoda doesn’t offer a hybrid option in its range, although one of the benefits of its more complicated engine and transmission is a fuel consumption which falls between what a plug-less hybrid or naturally aspirated rival might score.

The official/combined consumption of the 85TSI engine is just 5.5L/100km and for the 110TSI engine it is 5.6L/100km.

On our lengthy drive program at the launch both variants seemed to be landing a little over 6.0L/100km, which is more impressive than many rivals, which score in excess of 7.5L/100km in our testing.

Perhaps to even things out a little, the Kamiq’s turbocharged engines require mid-shelf 95 RON unleaded.

The Sorento PHEV hits most of the right notes when it comes to power delivery and gear shifts. Occasionally, there's a slight hesitation between whether the engine or electric motor should take the lead - like a dance partner who’s just a touch out of step. It’s noticeable, but not disruptive.

Most of the time, the transition between power sources is smooth, and there’s more than enough grunt for overtaking or merging confidently.

The suspension has a springy, soft edge to it and you’ll feel some movement over bumps but it’s never harsh or uncomfortable. It corners surprisingly well for a large SUV, with responsive, albeit lighter, steering. Body roll is present if you push into tight bends, but that's par for the course in a seven-seater.

Regenerative braking is subtle, almost too subtle. There’s not much feedback, and it can feel a bit heavy underfoot in stop-start traffic. It’s not a deal-breaker, but worth noting if you’re expecting the more pronounced regen feel you get in some other hybrids or EVs.

The cabin remains quiet at both urban and highway speeds, making it easy to hold a conversation across all three rows. Visibility is generally good, though the thicker pillars take a little getting used to. The digital rearview mirror is a great touch when the back seats are loaded with people or gear.

Parking is refreshingly simple thanks to a crisp 360-degree camera and front and rear sensors. One of my favourite features is the remote smart parking, which lets you move the car forwards or backwards via the keyfob, a lifesaver in tight parking spots. Just don’t teach your eight-year-old how to use it ...

What immediately sets the Kamiq apart the moment you hop in the driver’s seat is how hatch-like it feels. While a lot of small SUVs and crossovers in this price-bracket grant a really high seating position to make them feel bigger than they are, the Kamiq lets you sit closer to the floor.

This has the effect of making it feel even smaller than it is, but also lends it a sporty feel from behind the wheel. This is reinforced as soon as you start driving by its lightweight, agile feel.

Keen steering in both grades is backed by firm suspension, making the Kamiq responsive and agile, and because both engines are turbocharged they offer something quite different in this space normally dominated by dull naturally-aspirated 2.0L engines.

First, the catch. The dual clutch transmission can be a bit fiddly, particularly in the 85TSI which comes with a fair dollop of turbo-lag.

This means you’ll have to factor in a moment of delay before acceleration arrives at T-junctions or green lights. It can be frustrating at times, but the trade-off is the small capacity turbo engine pairs with efficient ratios to make for lean fuel consumption.

The fun factor is also boosted. Once you overcome the initial laggy moment, the little turbo engines surge to life with an agreeable gruff tone, and the dual-clutch transforms from fiddly to snappy once you’re at speed.

This means when you’ve got a nice road to carve up, the Skoda is a hell of a lot more entertaining to drive than almost any rival in this space.

It doesn’t have the clumsy handling of Chinese rivals, nor does it have the lifeless drone of a bigger, less efficient engine paired to a continuously variable automatic. It’s a rare slice of excitement in a small SUV category dominated by average drive experiences.

The cabin manages to feel upmarket in most ways, and is relatively easy-to-use on the go thanks to a commitment to the dials and switchgear. It is a comfortable companion on a long journey.

While the suspension is keen and keeps the car agile though, keep in mind the ride can be quite hard. This Skoda doesn’t quite have the poise or breadth of ability of its VW relations. Large wheels in both grades don't help this equation.

There is also a notable amount of tyre roar entering the cabin, particularly on coarse chip or at freeway speeds which, to be fair, is a common trait in this part of the market.

To summarise, the Kamiq is a uniquely European drive experience in an otherwise dull segment, and despite some drawbacks, it’s a real stand-out as a result.

Safety equipment is mostly impressive, although there is a small catch.

While active safety gear on both grades includes auto emergency braking (to freeway speeds, with rear manoeuvre braking), lane keep assist, and blind-spot monitoring, only the top-spec Monte Carlo gets adaptive cruise control, the more proactive adaptive lane guidance and park assist features.

Both cars get front and rear parking sensors, however, and a rear view camera but there’s no 360-degree parking suite.

I was also impressed to find none of the active safety items were invasive to the drive experience, which certainly can’t be said for every small SUV.

The standard array of six airbags is present, and there are dual ISOFIX points and three top tether mounts across the rear seats.

The Kamiq range was awarded a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating in 2020.

The Sorento is backed by Kia’s seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which keeps the Sorento competitive in a market that is slowly starting to offer seven/year plus terms as standard.

You’ll also benefit from capped-price servicing for up to seven years or 70,000km, with an average cost of $764 per visit. That’s on the pricier side, especially when compared to some rivals.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever comes first, so if you’re someone who racks up the kilometres quickly, that could mean more frequent trips to the service centre than you’d like.

It’s also worth noting that the GT-Line PHEV requires a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded petrol, which is something to factor into your ongoing running costs, particularly if you're already trying to offset fuel usage with regular charging.

Skoda is going to great lengths to try and challenge the idea that a European car can’t be as easy to own as a Japanese or Korean rival.

As a result, it is the first European brand to offer a seven-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is backed by a seven-year prepaid service pack.

This pack is reasonable. At $2650 it works out to $379 a year, which is not quite as affordable as Toyota or some Chinese rivals, but it’s also not expensive when you consider the service pricing of brands like Subaru or Kia.

It also offers a guaranteed future value program and the brand’s keen finance terms, on paper at least, make a Kamiq cheaper to own over five years than many of its competitors.