Kia Sorento vs Toyota Prado

What's the difference?

The Kia Sorento GT-Line PHEV is a sumptuously equipped seven-seater that delivers comfort, tech and an easy-going drive. It presents well on the surface, and for the right buyer (one who can make the most of its plug-in capabilities ) it could be a smart, low-emissions option for family life.

But for all its polish, it doesn’t quite do enough to justify itself as the best Sorento in the range. The electric-only driving range isn’t especially generous, and the higher price tag , combined with its lower towing capacity, may leave some families wondering whether the diesel variant is the more practical choice.

It’s not a bad car by any means, but the flagship GT-Line PHEV feels more like a stepping stone than a standout.

While no doubt the hybrid would appeal to some buyers, given the limits in towing capacity and higher fuel consumption, the extra performance doesn’t really make the i-Force Max a compelling proposition for the LandCruiser/Prado. Australian buyers have made it abundantly clear they’re happy with the Prado already on sale, so it’s hard to see the hybrid having too much success here alongside the diesel engine.

The Sorento looks exactly how a modern SUV should - confident, capable, and well-proportioned without feeling bulky. It wears its size well, delivering that commanding presence families often want in a seven-seater, without coming across as too aggressive.

I especially like the 19-inch alloy wheels as they suit the vehicle’s stance perfectly. I also like the striking LED lighting signatures front and rear, which really come to life after dark.

Step inside and the cabin strikes a neat balance between tech-forward and user-friendly. You’re greeted by dual 12.3-inch widescreen displays that make a strong first impression, but thankfully Kia hasn’t gone all-digital! You still get physical buttons and dials where they matter, making everything feel intuitive and easy to navigate.

Material quality is a highlight. There’s quilted Nappa leather upholstery, soft-touch surfaces throughout, and even a luxe suede headliner. These premium touches, coupled with the panoramic sunroof, lift the ambience and it's a cabin that feels genuinely upmarket, but not at the cost of family friendly functionality.

The Prado and LandCruiser largely look the same, but the 1958 we drove did have a few standout elements from a design perspective.

The most obvious are the retro round headlights of the 1958, which are meant to hark back to the original FJ Cruiser. The retro theme is helped by the round light framing the large rectangular mesh grille with ‘TOYOTA’ in big, bold letters.

Personally, I really like the round lights and think it’s a shame the Australian-bound Prado misses out, purely for the aesthetics.

Inside the cabin also feels like a throwback in time, but not to the 1950s, rather the late ‘80s and early ‘90s with the grey cloth trim. It’s a brave decision from Toyota to ditch a more modern look and feel, but, again, I really like it. It feels hard-wearing and suits the nature of the Land Cruiser in the US market, where it has to woo buyers away from Bronco and Wrangler.

One design choice of note is the US-spec version has ‘LandCruiser’ embossed on the dashboard ahead of the passenger, something else we miss out on here with our Prado.

Space up front is generous, with excellent seat comfort thanks to wide seat bases, extendable under-thigh support and heating and ventilation. Getting in and out is easy, too, helped by wide door openings and a manageable 176mm ground clearance.

Storage throughout the cabin is thoughtful and abundant. Up front, there’s a large glovebox, a spacious centre console with a removable shelf, two cupholders, door bins with bottle holders, and a handy phone cubby beneath the dash.

The second row adds its own bottle holders and storage bins in each door, map pockets, four cupholders (including one cleverly placed on each door) and a removable floor shelf in front of the centre seat.

Even the third row isn’t forgotten, with a snack cubby and cupholder built into each wheel arch.

Tech-wise, the dual 12.3-inch displays look sharp, and the media system is intuitive and quick to respond. The instrument cluster isn’t particularly customisable, and I’m not a huge fan of the layout, but it displays the essentials clearly. You also get a head-up display, satellite navigation with over-the-air updates, and both wireless and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

Charging options are solid across all three rows, with multiple USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket in the second row and boot, and a wireless charging pad up front.

The second row offers ample legroom, though headroom is slightly reduced due to the panoramic sunroof. The lack of a transmission tunnel is a win for middle seat comfort, and the bench is wide enough to accommodate three child seats side-by-side. There are three top-tether points and ISOFIX anchors on the outboard seats.

Comfort and convenience features in the second row include heated outboard seats, device pockets, directional air vents, and the same handy storage and charging options mentioned earlier. My son especially loves the retractable sunblinds and the cupholders built into the door handles as they’re easy to reach and super practical. I am, however, disappointed that there’s no separate climate control zone for this row.

As for the third row, it’s best treated as a sometimes seat for adults. Access is more child-sized, and amenities are limited, but you do get directional air vents and a fan control, which are definitely appreciated.

Boot space is tight with all three rows in use, at just 175L, but that was still enough for the odd errand during the week. Fold the third row down and you get a much more usable 604L. Both rows fold completely flat, making it easy to slide in larger items, and the GT-Line includes a powered tailgate and a rare full-size spare wheel for extra convenience.

As the entry-grade variant in the US range, the LandCruiser 1958 is more utilitarian than pampering. That translates to a cabin that has plenty of usability, just like the Australian-delivered LandCruiser Prados we’re used to.

There’s nothing overtly different about the US-spec model, with good space and small item storage in the front and decent room in the second row.

The multimedia system is the same as the one used here too, which speaks to Toyota’s strength for consistency of product around the world. It means anyone driving a Toyota - whether it’s in Australia, the US or elsewhere - has a sense of familiarity immediately.

It also helps that Toyota has stuck with a large amount of physical buttons and switchgear (I counted nearly 50) in addition to the touchscreen. While other brands look to cut controls to save money at the expense of usability, Toyota is sticking with what people know and enjoy.

However, the US version of the Prado has the same riser box inside the boot, which limits its cargo capacity in the same way as it has done here. It's still a reasonable size, but the riser does eat into space and compromises practicality.

For a bit of context to why the Prado is known as the LandCruiser in the States, Toyota USA skips the Fortuner for the 4Runner and ignores the LandCruiser 300 Series in favour of the Tundra-twinned Sequoia. That leaves the iconic LandCruiser nameplate unused, so it does make sense to ditch the ‘Prado’ name.

In the US it is positioned as a rival to the likes of the Ford Bronco and Jeep Wrangler, aimed at off-road adventure types, rather than the family market.

We drove the LandCruiser 1958, an entry-grade specification that has a ‘retro’ look and feel and features some unique design elements. It’s priced from US$56,700 (approx. $86,300), which is significantly more than the $72,500 Prado GX that starts our local range.

Despite the retro elements the 1958 variant gets a reasonable level of standard equipment, including keyless entry and ignition, heated fabric seats, climate control, a 7.0-inch digital instrument display panel, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen, six-speaker sound system and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android auto.

Powering this GT-Line variant is a plug-in hybrid system that pairs a 1.6-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine with a small electric motor and battery. Combined, the system delivers up to 195kW of power and 350Nm of torque, which is plenty to get this sizeable SUV moving with confidence.

It’s a part-time all-wheel-drive set-up with a lock mode for extra traction when needed, and it’s paired with a smooth-shifting six-speed automatic transmission.

Around town and on the highway, the power delivery feels seamless and refined, with the electric motor doing a nice job of smoothing out stop-start driving.

One key trade-off, however, is towing capacity. While the diesel Sorento can tow up to 2000kg braked, the PHEV’s figure drops to just 1010kg. That’s a significant reduction and could be a deal-breaker for families who regularly tow a camper, trailer or boat.

This is the heart of our review, the unavailable hybrid engine, the so-called 'i-Force Max' hybrid powertrain. This is because the US market has never embraced diesel engines, which are so beloved by Prado owners in Australia, so in the search for greater efficiency, Toyota USA is leaning on hybrid technology.

The set-up in the LandCruiser combines a 2.4-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine with an electric motor in the bell housing between the engine and eight-speed automatic transmission. The combined output of this petrol-electric hybrid is 243kW of power and 630Nm of torque, which is significantly more than the 150kW/500Nm offered by the 2.8-litre turbo diesel offered in Australia.

The catch is, despite the additional power and torque, the LandCruiser is only rated to tow slightly more than 2700kg compared to the 3500kg towing capacity offered by our diesel Prado.

The Sorento GT-Line PHEV offers a WLTP-rated electric-only driving range of up to 57km - not huge, but enough to cover most daily commutes or school runs without dipping into the petrol tank.

When driven as intended and regularly charged, it’s capable of a combined fuel consumption figure as low as 1.6L/100km and this is paired with a 67-litre fuel tank. That means you could go a seriously long time between fill-ups if you’re topping up the battery daily.

In my week of testing, which included a mix of highway stints and urban errands, the trip computer reported an average of 7.2L/100km.

That’s well above the official figure, but still pretty reasonable considering the type of driving I was doing.

Charging is simple enough. The Sorento uses a Type 2 charging port, and on a standard 3.3kW AC charger, the 14kWh battery can be charged from 15 to 95 per cent in about three hours and 26 minutes.

Kia includes a portable AC charger with this grade, which is a handy bonus for charging at home or on the go.

Obviously one of the biggest reasons for offering/choosing a hybrid engine is fuel efficiency and on that front the LandCruiser runs into the classic problem of big car, small engine. The official combined urban/highway fuel economy figure for the hybrid is 10.2L/100km, which is well behind the official claim for the diesel-powered Prado of just 7.6L/100km.

Drilling in deeper, the LandCruiser hybrid can drop as low as 9.4L/100km on the highway but rises to 10.6L/100km in a purely urban environment, which is typically the opposite to how hybrids excel.

The other major difference between the LandCruiser and our Prado is the size of the fuel tank. The US model only gets a 67-litre tank compared to the 110L offered in Australian models. That, naturally, has a major impact on range, with the LandCruiser hybrid only able to go a theoretical 656km on a single tank, compared to nearly 1300km for the Prado diesel.

The Sorento PHEV hits most of the right notes when it comes to power delivery and gear shifts. Occasionally, there's a slight hesitation between whether the engine or electric motor should take the lead - like a dance partner who’s just a touch out of step. It’s noticeable, but not disruptive.

Most of the time, the transition between power sources is smooth, and there’s more than enough grunt for overtaking or merging confidently.

The suspension has a springy, soft edge to it and you’ll feel some movement over bumps but it’s never harsh or uncomfortable. It corners surprisingly well for a large SUV, with responsive, albeit lighter, steering. Body roll is present if you push into tight bends, but that's par for the course in a seven-seater.

Regenerative braking is subtle, almost too subtle. There’s not much feedback, and it can feel a bit heavy underfoot in stop-start traffic. It’s not a deal-breaker, but worth noting if you’re expecting the more pronounced regen feel you get in some other hybrids or EVs.

The cabin remains quiet at both urban and highway speeds, making it easy to hold a conversation across all three rows. Visibility is generally good, though the thicker pillars take a little getting used to. The digital rearview mirror is a great touch when the back seats are loaded with people or gear.

Parking is refreshingly simple thanks to a crisp 360-degree camera and front and rear sensors. One of my favourite features is the remote smart parking, which lets you move the car forwards or backwards via the keyfob, a lifesaver in tight parking spots. Just don’t teach your eight-year-old how to use it ...

While it may be a hybrid, the LandCruiser is no urban ‘show pony’ and Toyota USA is adamant that it is tough enough to live up to the reputation of its famous nameplate. It’s built on the same TNGA-F platform as our Prado - as well as the Tundra pick-up and others - so it has the foundations for rugged adventure.

It comes standard with locking centre and rear differentials, rear coil springs, full-time four-wheel drive, a two-speed transfer case, ‘CRAWL Control’, a 2400W AC inverter and standard trailer brake controller, which are all must-haves for anyone planning a serious off-road trip.

While we have little reason to doubt the off-road ability of the LandCruiser, our test drive was limited to the urban jungle of Los Angeles, which allowed us to really focus on the powertrain.

Not surprisingly, given its similarities with other Toyota hybrid set-ups, it felt very familiar, albeit in a very different vehicle than the RAV4 and Camry we’ve driven previously. Despite its big on-paper numbers, there was some noticeable lag on initial acceleration and the engine sounds like a modern four-cylinder - a bit gruff when revved hard.

It certainly has enough performance to pull the LandCruiser along, but it isn’t over-endowed with power and torque. At least not in the way its stats suggest.

For the most part, around town, it did a good job of quietly motivating the big SUV around with a minimum of fuss.

Being a US-specific model there is no ANCAP or Euro NCAP crash testing data, but given the diesel model scored a five-star rating there’s little evidence to suggest it would be any less safe.

All US LandCruiser models come standard with the Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 suite of active safety features. This includes pre-collision warning, lane departure warning with steering assist, lane tracing assist, road sign assist and full-speed adaptive cruise control.

The Sorento is backed by Kia’s seven-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty, which keeps the Sorento competitive in a market that is slowly starting to offer seven/year plus terms as standard.

You’ll also benefit from capped-price servicing for up to seven years or 70,000km, with an average cost of $764 per visit. That’s on the pricier side, especially when compared to some rivals.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever comes first, so if you’re someone who racks up the kilometres quickly, that could mean more frequent trips to the service centre than you’d like.

It’s also worth noting that the GT-Line PHEV requires a minimum of 95 RON premium unleaded petrol, which is something to factor into your ongoing running costs, particularly if you're already trying to offset fuel usage with regular charging.

One big plus for the LandCruiser over the Prado is Toyota USA offers two years of free servicing - a nice bonus.

It does have different warranty coverage for different components though, the overall vehicle warranty covers the first three years, the powertrain is covered for five years but the hybrid components are warranted for 10 years.