GWM Tank 300 vs Mahindra Scorpio-N

What's the difference?

There’s a lot to like here. The GWM Tank 300 in any of its forms is a competent vehicle from the helm and backs up its off-road claims with real ability. The ride quality, in particular, is a highlight, and it’s a good size for couples or young families. Its value for money is also quite brilliant.

Add this plug-in hybrid driveline to the mix and the performance is quite astounding, while the petrol engine and EV potential have arrived at a critical point in history where such things carry more weight than ever before. It remains to be seen what happens globally and what effect that has on fuel prices, specifically the price gap between petrol and diesel. There’s also the question of what happens electronically when you dunk the Tank into Nolan’s Brook on the track to Cape York. But for now, this is a car whose time appears to have come.

But while the overall concept deserves praise, there’s still some work required in terms of the way the car drives and in its attempts at keeping its occupants safe. The calibration of both the throttle response and some of the driver aids is, frankly, in need of some final polish. And though it sounds odd, the Tank 300 would be a better thing to live with if GWM ditched the contentious driver aids and took the points hit on its ANCAP rating. Even better would be to stick with the tech but refine it to the point where it works in the background and not as an irritant.

It may seem like I've been harsh on this Mahindra but I reckon the Scorpio Z8L+ is a positive product for the company.

It’s nice enough to drive on-road – reasonably refined and comfortable – and it’s also a capable 4WD, with some trade-offs.

But this seven-seat wagon remains a good value-for-money prospect with the addition of more driver-assist tech onboard boosting its safety and adding to its overall appeal.

Derivative is a strong word, but from most angles there’s a little bit of something else in the Tank 300’s exterior. We can easily see a bit of Suzuki Jimny in profile, and a dash of new Ford Bronco in the lights and grille. And if you squint there’s a blob of Jeep Wrangler in the wheel-arch extensions.

Which should mean it’s just a mash-up. Yet somehow, it isn’t, and the Tank has its own vibe.

Inside, that vibe suddenly becomes a bit overdone, and the plastic garnish above the glove box, in particular, looks like it will date pretty quickly (if it hasn't already). There's also a lot going on in here; this is a busy place and even the gear selector looks like a prop form the Star Wars franchise.

Nothing has changed on the Scorpio’s exterior. It still reminds me of the early-generation Hyundai Terracan – long bonnet, generic cabin (i.e. inoffensive, soft lines, nothing to set it apart from most other mid-sized SUVs) and, though its off-road angles check out (more about those later) it looks quite low to the ground.

So it’s all standard for a 4WD wagon.

The Scorpio also has 18-inch alloy wheels, side steps, roof rails and a sunroof.

Potential main rival GWM Tank 300 holds sway in the looks department.

While GWM is by no means the worst offender, we still reckon the Tank’s interior would be better without such a degree of reliance of touchscreens and menu-driven functionality. While it’s obvious that there’s a lot going on in the cabin, it still seems odd that important functions such as shifting from conventional hybrid mode to EV mode would require a dive through the on-screen menus when a simple switch would be faster, easier and simpler.

And even when GWM has provided switches, the end result is muddy. Take the volume controls for an example. There’s no central volume knob accessible by both front seat occupants, so you rely on the steering wheel mounted up and down buttons to change the volume. Except they’re not marked as volume controls in any specific way. Okay, if you know, you know. But if you don’t know, you’ve just missed the news headlines.

Overall, it's disappointing. And I resent the fact that GWM (or anybody else) thinks it’s okay for me to have to learn to operate a car all over again. The dashboard is also full of tiny symbols and lettering making things difficult to decipher if you normally wear glasses to read, but not to drive.

We’ll take issue with the indicator stalk, too, which has an indistinct feel when trying to discern whether you turned the indicators on for an intersection, or just tipped them on for three flashes for a lane change. And if you have accidentally gone too far and they’re still flashing away merrily after the lane change, turning them off manually is a lottery that might see you succeed, or mistakenly turn on the other side flashers.

The rest is better with proper buttons for the various off-road drive modes, diff locks and hill holder. There’s even an analogue clock for some real nostalgia. You’ll also find a single USB-A and USB-C charge port in the dash, and a pair of cupholders buried deep in the centre console which also has a lid and sliding drawer.

It’s obvious that this is a smaller vehicle than some, and the four-door layout dictates shorter doors. But that doesn’t alter the fact that the driver’s seat slides back a few centimetres every time you shut the car down. The trouble with that if you’re tall, is that the seat is now tucked back in behind the B-pillar, meaning you have to climb out and around it to exit the car. Perhaps you can switch off this slide-back function, but I didn’t have the spare hour to troll through the menus to do so. Oh, and there should be a driver’s grab handle on the A-pillar, too. There isn’t.

The rear seat is better with an adjustable backrest that provides proper comfort, and leg and knee room that hides the 300’s smaller dimensions well. There’s lots of glass and light and a pair of USB charge points. You also get a pair of rear reading lights and central vents, but no climate controls.

Even the cargo area is a decent size with the five seats in place (360 litres, up to 1520L with 60/40 rear seats lowered) but the under-floor storage space has been consumed by the hybrid battery, meaning the jack and tools and charging cable live in the cargo area and the spare tyre is bolted to the tailgate.

The single-piece tailgate is hinged at the side, and needs a fair bit of real estate to be swung open fully.

The Tank features vehicle-to-load capability, too, which means you can operate your power tools using the vehicle as the power source, and there’s a 220-volt socket in the luggage area to do just that. But when camping, too, this feature can also power induction cookers, microwaves, and all the other stuff you probably should have left at home. And if the hybrid battery runs out of charge, the Tank can run its petrol engine to act as a generator (your camping neighbours are going to love that).

The real gadget freaks out there can also download the Tank app which allows you to operate functions such as power windows, climate control, seat heaters, central locking and check your charging status all from the comfort of your smartphone. You can also use this functionality to flash the hazard lights to help spot your Tank from everybody else’s in the carpark.

Nothing much has changed inside the Scorpio, either, except for the addition of an electronic park brake.

The cabin has a neat layout with a 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system that is easy to operate but it needs to be bigger.

The synthetic leather trim looks and feels only adequately premium and if you more closely scrutinise the Scorpio’s interior it lacks the build quality, storage spaces and USB charge points of rival wagons.

Driver and front passenger get adequate room, while the second row is actually satisfactorily spacious without being capacious; behind my driving position I had more than enough leg, head and shoulder room – but, take note, I'm the size of a garden gnome. The third row is the stuff of nightmares – only joking, but it should quite rightly be limited to use by small children or your mate the jockey.

There’s one cupholder (between the driver and front passenger), door pockets are narrow and there are few other storage spaces. In this respect, the Scorpio cabin lacks general functionality.

The Scorpio also cops a mark down because of its third row. With the third-row seats in use, there’s a small rear cargo area, and those seats don’t fold flat so when they’re not in use they occupy a lot of what could be useable storage space.

As a result, the Scorpio is one of the few modern 4WDs I’d consider removing the third row every time long-distance loaded-up travel was on the cards – just so it’s a more practical touring vehicle.

Some features, such as the directional air vents, feel flimsy. Otherwise, the Scorpio’s cabin is adequately practical, rather than overly impressive.

Suffice to say, in terms of practicality, the Scorpio’s rivals have it beaten.

As mentioned, there is only one Mahindra Scorpio now available, the Z8L+. And its price-tag is listed as from $48,990, drive-away. That’s $2000 more than its previous incarnation, the Z8L.

Standard features in the Z8L+ include a 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system (with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), a 12-speaker Sony stereo, dual-zone climate control, front and rear parking sensors and a six-way power-adjustable driver’s seat.

New features include ventilated front seats, an electronic park brake, an auto-dimming rear view mirror and, more importantly, the Scorpio now has Level 2 Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) detailed in the Safety section.

It also has 18-inch alloys, a full-sized steel spare, power sunroof and synthetic leather trim.

Exterior paint choices include 'Deep Forest', 'Everest White', and 'Stealth Black'. Metallic paint costs $495 and floor mats cost $125. Price as tested for this vehicle is $49,610.

Rivals such as the GWM Tank 300 and KGM Rexton offer more in this category.

The Tank’s plug-in driveline, starts with a petrol engine measuring 2.0-litres and contributing 180kW to the overall picture. But then there’s a single electric motor, sandwiched between the petrol engine and the nine-speed transmission. That means the Tank is still a mechanical four-wheel-drive platform, and when both powerplants are singing together, there’s an eye-opening 300kW and 750Nm of torque on tap.

The four-wheel-drive system operates as a rear-wheel drive on dry bitumen, and there’s the usual 4WD high range and 4WD low range. What there isn’t, is a 4WD-auto setting that allows you to use four-wheel drive in the dry on a paved road. That sounds minor, but for towing in particular, having all four wheels doing the driving is a major safety bonus.

All Tank 300s get a rear differential lock, but this version, the Ultra, also gets a locking front diff as well. Typically, the Tank also features a range of driving modes (no less than nine of them!) for the four-wheel-drive function, tailoring throttle, transmission and differential response according to the type of terrain being covered.

The Tank 300 is built the old fashioned way with a ladder-chassis upon which the body is bolted, and it still uses a live rear axle, too. But the front suspension is independent and the GWM uses coil springs rather than old-school leaf springs for much better ride quality.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ has a 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, producing 129kW and 400Nm and it’s matched to a six-speed automatic transmission.

This engine-and-auto combination is sluggish at times but it’s generally okay.

The Scorpio has a part-time 4WD system (with high- and low-range) and an automatic rear diff lock.

Worth noting the Scorpio must be in neutral and stationary for the driver to shift into '4WD low-range', but the driver is able to shift between '2WD' and '4WD High' on the move, up to 80km/h.

This 4WD wagon’s '4Explor' system’s drive modes include 'Normal' (2WD for sealed surfaces), 'Grass/Snow' (4WD), 'Mud & Ruts' (4WD) and 'Sand' (4WD).

The Scorpio lags behind its rivals here.

The headline number here is GWM’s official fuel consumption number of just 1.9 litres per 100km. Or it would be if it had anything to do with the real world. As it is, nobody is going to achieve that, and our mix of urban running netted an average of about 11.0 litres per 100km, with that dropping to 8.5 litres per 100km in country conditions.

The truth is, your consumption in this vehicle can go from zero to, say, 12 litres per 100km depending on how and where you drive and how much battery charge you have available.

Speaking of charging, the Tank 300 can use a commercial fast charger to absorb voltage at a rate of 50kW. At that rate, it can go from 30 to 80 per cent charged in about 24 minutes. A wall box (GWM offers one as a factory option) can take the 37.1kWh battery from 15 per cent to fully charged in 6.5 hours. And, of course, you can also charge the Tank from a domestic wall socket in a claimed 14.4 hours. We managed to add about 6km worth of charge per hour on such an outlet during our time with the car.

As far as range goes, GWM reckons there’s 115km (NEDC) of EV-only range, while starting a journey with a fully charged battery and a full 70-litre fuel tank should see you covering somewhere between 900 and 950km between top ups.

Official fuel consumption is 7.2L/100km on a combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle on regular unleaded fuel.

Actual fuel consumption on this test was 9.0L/100km, which is better than the 9.6L/100km I recorded on my last Scorpio review a couple of years ago.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ has a 57-litre fuel tank so, going by those fuel figures, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 633km from a full tank. It also has a 16-litre Adblue tank, so keep that mind.

Remember, that 633km is a best-case scenario figure and has not had a 30-50km safe-distance buffer subtracted from it. And it doesn't take into account the fact that, when being used for touring, the Scorpio may be loaded with people, pets, camping gear and more.

Rivals such as the GWM Tank 300 easily outclass the Scorpio when it comes to off-roading and all-round touring suitability.

GWM claims a 0-100km/h acceleration time of just 6.3 seconds for the Tank 300 PHEV, and that’s impressive. There are two caveats here. The first is that you need at least 40 per cent battery charge on board to extract maximum thrust. And, secondly, even in those circumstances, the Tank never feels that brisk. It’s more effortless than genuinely rapid, although the torque up hills is genuinely impressive.

There’s no getting around the refinement inherent in using volts for some of the time. And when the petrol engine does chime in, it’s all but imperceptible. You’ll eventually hear the engine if you wring it right out, but even then, vibrations are minimal.

All in all, the Tank’s relatively compact dimensions work in its favour in an urban setting, and the range of camera views (including an off-road one showing you the obstacles you’re about to encounter) make parking a lot easier than it might have been. Only a high degree of distortion in the birds-eye-view camera mode takes a bit of getting used to.

On the move the ride quality is quite exceptional, and those coil springs really do make a difference. Even the usual council speed bumps don’t bother the Tank and the short wheelbase pitching we’ve seen in some similar vehicles just never emerges. Well chosen damper rates help, too, and there has been some Australian input into the way the Tank handles. It shows.

Steering, too, feels light and natural, although the almost constant fidgeting at the helm by the lane-keeping assistance program is annoying. And switching it off is not only a multi-button job, it needs to be done every time you start the vehicle.

Far and away the biggest hurdle in living with the Tank, however, is a throttle calibration that is way off the mark. Pressing the accelerator pedal initially doesn’t seem to do much at all, and then suddenly, the power comes in and you discover you’ve input too much throttle as the Tank surges away down the road, threatening to actually spin its tyres if there’s any gravel about. But not until that initial hesitation has caused the driver behind you to wonder aloud (I can lip-read) if you’re ever going to move at all. This needs to be fixed as a running change.

The all-important off-road driving experience is pretty sharp and the Tank 300 is a genuine competitor in this discipline. It’s extremely stable and capable on unsealed roads and tracks and the front and rear diff locks make it a proper adventurer’s rig.

It’s relatively demure dimensions also mean that it fits down the tracks and trails that have been created by decades of vehicles of a similar size, unlike some of the bigger new off-roaders we’re seeing that simply don’t fit in to the terrain so neatly.

Ultimately, the Tank’s stock tyres will be the limiting factor, but there are plenty of alternatives out there for a bit more off-road bite.

On road the Scorpio is reasonable. It’s comfortable and refined but can be a bit firm on the suspension it has – double wishbone and coil springs at the front, live axle with multi links, Watts link and coil springs at the rear. But for a four-wheel drive wagon it's quite nice on sealed surfaces.

The powertrain is generally a reasonable set-up, although there is lag between foot-down and acceleration and it holds onto gears for too long before upshifting.

There have been no mechanical changes to this Scorpio over the previous generation and that's fine because this Mahindra’s tractable engine offers reasonable power and torque across enough of a rev range to make it an effective 4WD.

The Scorpio feels comfortable and reasonable off road. And when it’s time to tackle ‘4WD-only’ territory, it is generally capable. High- and low-range gearing is decent, and as mentioned earlier, its off-road drive modes adjust traction control, among other aspects, to best suit the terrain you’re tackling.

Its no rock-crawling beast but as a result of these mechanical and technical elements this 4WD wagon is able to drive the kind of terrain you’d reasonably expect to be able to cover in a standard off-roader that's been engineered for 4WDing across light to moderately difficult terrain.

The Scorpio’s off-road angles and ground clearance are on par with mid-size SUV rivals. Ground clearance is a listed 227mm. It feels quite low, but if you drive it with care and consideration, you should be fine.

The rear diff lock doesn't feel as clunky in its application as it has in the past. Maybe I'm more forgiving in my old age because, as I mentioned earlier, there haven't been any upgrades mechanically or in terms of off-road-specific driver-assist tech or in diff lock operation.

Hill descent control works reasonably well, although it's not the greatest, allowing for some free-wheeling before it bites.

The Scorpio’s road-oriented Bridgestone Ecopia (255/60 R18) tyres are fine on formed dirt tracks but are found wanting on anything rougher than that.

In terms of towing capacity, the Scorpio is able to tow 750kg unbraked and 2500kg braked. So if you're looking to haul anything larger than a small box trailer, camper trailer or tinny, you'll have to look elsewhere.

GVM and GCM are 2610kg and 5155kg, respectively.

Main potential rival GWM Tank 300 has it over the Scorpio in terms of off-roading prowess and, even though it’s not a towing beast, the GWM wagon is better suited to life as a touring platform than the Mahindra.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ hasn't been tested by ANCAP, but as standard it has six airbags (front, side and curtain) and a 'Level 2 Advanced Driver Assistance System' which includes AEB, 'Forward Collision Warning', 'Front Vehicle Start Alert', adaptive cruise control, high-beam assist, lane departure warning, 'Smart Pilot Assist', 'Speed Limit Assist', lane keep assist and more.

It also has electronic stability control, front and rear parking sensors and a tyre pressure monitoring system.

Rivals such as the GWM Tank 300, with a full suite of driver-driver-assist tech and the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating, have it all over this Mahindra in this category.

GWM offers a seven year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the Tank 300, as well as eight years of cover for the hybrid battery (also with no kilometre limit). There’s also seven years of roadside assistance thrown in, too.

Capped-price servicing is available for the first seven years, with the first service due at 12 months or 10,000km and subsequent services every 12 months of 15,000km after that. Prices for each service (in order) are: $320, $460, $460, $685, $685, $1075, and $370.

GWM has a network of 123 new-car dealerships able to handle servicing, and the company tells us that regional centres have not been forgotten.

The Mahindra Scorpio Z8L+ has a seven-year/150,000km warranty and comes with seven years' of roadside assistance if your Scorpio is serviced by Mahindra.

The first service is scheduled at the 1500km mark, then every 12 months or 10,000km. Pricing details were not available at the time of writing.

Five years of capped price servicing is available at an average cost per visit of $471.

For reference, the GWM Tank 300 offers a seven year/unlimited km warranty, five years' of roadside assistance, and five years of capped price servicing (starting at $360 for the first service and topping out at $1035 for the sixth). Service intervals are scheduled for every 12 months or 15,000km.

At time of writing there were reportedly about 80 Mahindra dealerships spread across Australia. According to the company, "the dealer network spans all states and territories, including locations in major cities like Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth". Your Scorpio can be serviced at any authorised Mahindra dealership.