GWM Tank 300 vs Toyota RAV4

What's the difference?

There’s a lot to like here. The GWM Tank 300 in any of its forms is a competent vehicle from the helm and backs up its off-road claims with real ability. The ride quality, in particular, is a highlight, and it’s a good size for couples or young families. Its value for money is also quite brilliant.

Add this plug-in hybrid driveline to the mix and the performance is quite astounding, while the petrol engine and EV potential have arrived at a critical point in history where such things carry more weight than ever before. It remains to be seen what happens globally and what effect that has on fuel prices, specifically the price gap between petrol and diesel. There’s also the question of what happens electronically when you dunk the Tank into Nolan’s Brook on the track to Cape York. But for now, this is a car whose time appears to have come.

But while the overall concept deserves praise, there’s still some work required in terms of the way the car drives and in its attempts at keeping its occupants safe. The calibration of both the throttle response and some of the driver aids is, frankly, in need of some final polish. And though it sounds odd, the Tank 300 would be a better thing to live with if GWM ditched the contentious driver aids and took the points hit on its ANCAP rating. Even better would be to stick with the tech but refine it to the point where it works in the background and not as an irritant.

The new Toyota RAV4 Cruiser Hybrid 2WD builds on what made it so popular in the first place. It’s easy to drive, efficient and well equipped, with enough features to suit a wide range of buyers.

The updated technology is a clear step forward and lifts the overall experience, but there are still elements that feel out of step with the flagship positioning, particularly the use of hard plastics and some less refined finishes. Even so, it remains a practical and well-rounded option in the segment.

Derivative is a strong word, but from most angles there’s a little bit of something else in the Tank 300’s exterior. We can easily see a bit of Suzuki Jimny in profile, and a dash of new Ford Bronco in the lights and grille. And if you squint there’s a blob of Jeep Wrangler in the wheel-arch extensions.

Which should mean it’s just a mash-up. Yet somehow, it isn’t, and the Tank has its own vibe.

Inside, that vibe suddenly becomes a bit overdone, and the plastic garnish above the glove box, in particular, looks like it will date pretty quickly (if it hasn't already). There's also a lot going on in here; this is a busy place and even the gear selector looks like a prop form the Star Wars franchise.

The previous RAV4 had a distinct, unmistakable look, particularly from the rear but the new design feels a little more subdued by comparison.

It leans into a more conventional SUV shape, with a front grille that borrows heavily from the HiLux, including a strong use of body-coloured panelling. It still presents well at the kerb, but it doesn’t quite have the same standout presence as before.

Inside is where the biggest changes have happened. The dashboard sits lower, there are more storage cubbies and the new displays modernise the space nicely. There are fewer physical buttons than before, with some seat and climate controls now integrated into the touchscreen. It’s not my preference, but overall the layout remains intuitive and easy to navigate.

Looking around the cabin, it still feels very Toyota in its execution. There’s a noticeable use of plastics, even in this flagship grade, though there are enough soft-touch areas to keep things feeling solid and well put together.

One small drawback is the dual-opening, reversible centre console lid as it tends to squeak and doesn’t feel quite as robust as the rest of the interior.

While GWM is by no means the worst offender, we still reckon the Tank’s interior would be better without such a degree of reliance of touchscreens and menu-driven functionality. While it’s obvious that there’s a lot going on in the cabin, it still seems odd that important functions such as shifting from conventional hybrid mode to EV mode would require a dive through the on-screen menus when a simple switch would be faster, easier and simpler.

And even when GWM has provided switches, the end result is muddy. Take the volume controls for an example. There’s no central volume knob accessible by both front seat occupants, so you rely on the steering wheel mounted up and down buttons to change the volume. Except they’re not marked as volume controls in any specific way. Okay, if you know, you know. But if you don’t know, you’ve just missed the news headlines.

Overall, it's disappointing. And I resent the fact that GWM (or anybody else) thinks it’s okay for me to have to learn to operate a car all over again. The dashboard is also full of tiny symbols and lettering making things difficult to decipher if you normally wear glasses to read, but not to drive.

We’ll take issue with the indicator stalk, too, which has an indistinct feel when trying to discern whether you turned the indicators on for an intersection, or just tipped them on for three flashes for a lane change. And if you have accidentally gone too far and they’re still flashing away merrily after the lane change, turning them off manually is a lottery that might see you succeed, or mistakenly turn on the other side flashers.

The rest is better with proper buttons for the various off-road drive modes, diff locks and hill holder. There’s even an analogue clock for some real nostalgia. You’ll also find a single USB-A and USB-C charge port in the dash, and a pair of cupholders buried deep in the centre console which also has a lid and sliding drawer.

It’s obvious that this is a smaller vehicle than some, and the four-door layout dictates shorter doors. But that doesn’t alter the fact that the driver’s seat slides back a few centimetres every time you shut the car down. The trouble with that if you’re tall, is that the seat is now tucked back in behind the B-pillar, meaning you have to climb out and around it to exit the car. Perhaps you can switch off this slide-back function, but I didn’t have the spare hour to troll through the menus to do so. Oh, and there should be a driver’s grab handle on the A-pillar, too. There isn’t.

The rear seat is better with an adjustable backrest that provides proper comfort, and leg and knee room that hides the 300’s smaller dimensions well. There’s lots of glass and light and a pair of USB charge points. You also get a pair of rear reading lights and central vents, but no climate controls.

Even the cargo area is a decent size with the five seats in place (360 litres, up to 1520L with 60/40 rear seats lowered) but the under-floor storage space has been consumed by the hybrid battery, meaning the jack and tools and charging cable live in the cargo area and the spare tyre is bolted to the tailgate.

The single-piece tailgate is hinged at the side, and needs a fair bit of real estate to be swung open fully.

The Tank features vehicle-to-load capability, too, which means you can operate your power tools using the vehicle as the power source, and there’s a 220-volt socket in the luggage area to do just that. But when camping, too, this feature can also power induction cookers, microwaves, and all the other stuff you probably should have left at home. And if the hybrid battery runs out of charge, the Tank can run its petrol engine to act as a generator (your camping neighbours are going to love that).

The real gadget freaks out there can also download the Tank app which allows you to operate functions such as power windows, climate control, seat heaters, central locking and check your charging status all from the comfort of your smartphone. You can also use this functionality to flash the hazard lights to help spot your Tank from everybody else’s in the carpark.

As far as mid-size SUVs go, the Toyota RAV4 still hits a solid beat when it comes to overall practicality. It doesn't get everything right but it does enough.

The space up front is generous and the seats are comfortable, especially with their added heat and ventilation functions. Access is decent enough with wide door apertures and an easy ground clearance and the only drawback is the high lip in the footwell, which can catch your foot slightly when getting out.

Storage is a highlight due the sheer number of options with a deep middle console, centre trays, sunglasses holder and dashboard shelving. Add in a couple of cupholders and drink bottle holders and it shouldn't be difficult to keep the cockpit tidy.

In the second row, there’s plenty of space for adults, with good leg- and headroom and a seat that’s supportive enough for longer trips. The leather trim feels nice, and practical touches like large map pockets and cupholders are appreciated.

However, for a flagship grade, it feels a little underdone on features. You get rear air vents and USB-C ports, but miss out on things like climate control, sunblinds and more thoughtful storage solutions. There are two ISOFIX points and three top-tether anchors, though realistically two child seats will fit best.

As mentioned, the technology upgrades are a big step forward. The new multimedia system is clean, responsive and easy to use, and while wireless Apple CarPlay can get confused if you have multiple device connections stored, it works seamlessly once pared back to one.

There’s built-in satellite navigation, a highly customisable digital instrument cluster that can display directions, and a solid mix of charging options including dual wireless pads, a 12-volt socket and four USB-C ports (two in each row).

Around the back, the boot is well-shaped and easy to load, with a claimed 705L of capacity when measured to the roofline. A powered tailgate, 12-volt socket and temporary spare tyre all add to its usability.

That said, the adjustable boot floor and cargo cover feel a bit flimsy and awkward in practice, which is slightly at odds with the otherwise practical and family-friendly focus.

There are six grades available in the new RAV4 line-up, split across a hybrid powertrain for now, with a plug-in hybrid set to join the range soon. We’re in the flagship Cruiser FWD hybrid for this family test, which is priced from $56,990, before on-road costs, and yes, that’s creeping close to $6.0K more than the outgoing model.

But here’s the twist, it’s still one of the more affordable options compared to its nearest rivals. The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid Premium starts at $58,350 MSRP, while the Kia Sportage GT-Line Hybrid FWD jumps significantly higher at $71,540 MSRP.

Even the Mazda CX-5 Akera, which sits in the same segment from $54,990, doesn’t offer a hybrid powertrain. So while the price hike stings a little, the value argument still stacks up.

Straight outta the gate, the biggest glow-up is the tech. The new 12.9-inch touchscreen runs Toyota’s 'Arene' operating system, bringing cleaner graphics, a more intuitive layout and over-the-air updates. It’s not as flashy as some rivals, but it’s a big step forward from the outgoing system and it’s easier to live with day-to-day.

There’s also a refreshed 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a colour head-up display and a digital rearview mirror.

Add in the nine-speaker JBL sound system, dual wireless charging pads, four USB-C ports and built-in satellite navigation and you have a nicely rounded tech package.

Being the flagship, the Cruiser leans into the premium feel with heated and ventilated electric front seats, leather upholstery, heated rear outboard seats and a panoramic moonroof. But interestingly, those last two are the only standout upgrades over lower grades.

Practical items include a powered tailgate, 12-volt socket and a temporary spare tyre but you miss out on some top-grade items in the second row that you might expect. Like climate control, device pockets and sunblinds. Omissions families will notice.

The Tank’s plug-in driveline, starts with a petrol engine measuring 2.0-litres and contributing 180kW to the overall picture. But then there’s a single electric motor, sandwiched between the petrol engine and the nine-speed transmission. That means the Tank is still a mechanical four-wheel-drive platform, and when both powerplants are singing together, there’s an eye-opening 300kW and 750Nm of torque on tap.

The four-wheel-drive system operates as a rear-wheel drive on dry bitumen, and there’s the usual 4WD high range and 4WD low range. What there isn’t, is a 4WD-auto setting that allows you to use four-wheel drive in the dry on a paved road. That sounds minor, but for towing in particular, having all four wheels doing the driving is a major safety bonus.

All Tank 300s get a rear differential lock, but this version, the Ultra, also gets a locking front diff as well. Typically, the Tank also features a range of driving modes (no less than nine of them!) for the four-wheel-drive function, tailoring throttle, transmission and differential response according to the type of terrain being covered.

The Tank 300 is built the old fashioned way with a ladder-chassis upon which the body is bolted, and it still uses a live rear axle, too. But the front suspension is independent and the GWM uses coil springs rather than old-school leaf springs for much better ride quality.

Under the bonnet, the RAV4 pairs a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with an electric motor as part of its updated hybrid system. Toyota doesn’t quote a combined torque figure, and total power has dropped slightly to 143kW, down 17kW from the previous front-wheel drive variant.

On paper, that reduction might raise a few eyebrows, but in practice it’s not something you notice often. What is more apparent is the improvement in refinement, with smoother transitions between electric and petrol power that make the overall driving experience feel more polished.

The headline number here is GWM’s official fuel consumption number of just 1.9 litres per 100km. Or it would be if it had anything to do with the real world. As it is, nobody is going to achieve that, and our mix of urban running netted an average of about 11.0 litres per 100km, with that dropping to 8.5 litres per 100km in country conditions.

The truth is, your consumption in this vehicle can go from zero to, say, 12 litres per 100km depending on how and where you drive and how much battery charge you have available.

Speaking of charging, the Tank 300 can use a commercial fast charger to absorb voltage at a rate of 50kW. At that rate, it can go from 30 to 80 per cent charged in about 24 minutes. A wall box (GWM offers one as a factory option) can take the 37.1kWh battery from 15 per cent to fully charged in 6.5 hours. And, of course, you can also charge the Tank from a domestic wall socket in a claimed 14.4 hours. We managed to add about 6km worth of charge per hour on such an outlet during our time with the car.

As far as range goes, GWM reckons there’s 115km (NEDC) of EV-only range, while starting a journey with a fully charged battery and a full 70-litre fuel tank should see you covering somewhere between 900 and 950km between top ups.

Efficiency remains a strong point for the RAV4. Toyota claims a combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption figure of 4.5L/100km, and with a 55-litre fuel tank, that equates to a theoretical driving range of over 1000km.

In the real world, my average came in at 5.5L/100km across a mix of urban and open-road driving, which is an impressive result. The only caveat is Toyota’s recommendation for 95 RON premium fuel, which may add slightly to running costs over time.

GWM claims a 0-100km/h acceleration time of just 6.3 seconds for the Tank 300 PHEV, and that’s impressive. There are two caveats here. The first is that you need at least 40 per cent battery charge on board to extract maximum thrust. And, secondly, even in those circumstances, the Tank never feels that brisk. It’s more effortless than genuinely rapid, although the torque up hills is genuinely impressive.

There’s no getting around the refinement inherent in using volts for some of the time. And when the petrol engine does chime in, it’s all but imperceptible. You’ll eventually hear the engine if you wring it right out, but even then, vibrations are minimal.

All in all, the Tank’s relatively compact dimensions work in its favour in an urban setting, and the range of camera views (including an off-road one showing you the obstacles you’re about to encounter) make parking a lot easier than it might have been. Only a high degree of distortion in the birds-eye-view camera mode takes a bit of getting used to.

On the move the ride quality is quite exceptional, and those coil springs really do make a difference. Even the usual council speed bumps don’t bother the Tank and the short wheelbase pitching we’ve seen in some similar vehicles just never emerges. Well chosen damper rates help, too, and there has been some Australian input into the way the Tank handles. It shows.

Steering, too, feels light and natural, although the almost constant fidgeting at the helm by the lane-keeping assistance program is annoying. And switching it off is not only a multi-button job, it needs to be done every time you start the vehicle.

Far and away the biggest hurdle in living with the Tank, however, is a throttle calibration that is way off the mark. Pressing the accelerator pedal initially doesn’t seem to do much at all, and then suddenly, the power comes in and you discover you’ve input too much throttle as the Tank surges away down the road, threatening to actually spin its tyres if there’s any gravel about. But not until that initial hesitation has caused the driver behind you to wonder aloud (I can lip-read) if you’re ever going to move at all. This needs to be fixed as a running change.

The all-important off-road driving experience is pretty sharp and the Tank 300 is a genuine competitor in this discipline. It’s extremely stable and capable on unsealed roads and tracks and the front and rear diff locks make it a proper adventurer’s rig.

It’s relatively demure dimensions also mean that it fits down the tracks and trails that have been created by decades of vehicles of a similar size, unlike some of the bigger new off-roaders we’re seeing that simply don’t fit in to the terrain so neatly.

Ultimately, the Tank’s stock tyres will be the limiting factor, but there are plenty of alternatives out there for a bit more off-road bite.

On the road, the RAV4 Hybrid 2WD performs confidently across most situations. It can sound a little strained when pushed hard, but there’s enough power on tap to keep up with traffic without issue.

The ride leans towards slightly firm, paired with responsive steering that gives it a more controlled feel through corners than you might expect. It remains stable at speed and around town feels punchy and easy to drive.

For those who prefer a stronger regenerative braking effect, switching to 'B' mode adds a noticeable increase, which works well in urban traffic. Refinement is another highlight. It’s impressively quiet on the move, even at highway speeds and feels well suited to longer trips.

One of the standout improvements is the 360-degree camera system. Where the previous version fell short, this one is clear and easy to use, making parking straightforward.

Due to myriad delays, Toyota wasn’t able to submit the new RAV4 for testing with ANCAP before the new and more stringent 2026 protocols kicked in, and thus it’s unrated for now, with a yet-to-be-detailed upgrade to come later to meet the stricter standard.

For now, it has a strong suite of safety equipment included, like eight-airbags, side exit assist, front and rear cross-traffic alert and emergency phone call capability. The adaptive cruise control is one of the better systems I’ve used in a long time and only the driver monitoring is annoyingly intrusive, otherwise the safety stuff seems well-calibrated for everyday use.

Other safety equipment includes lane departure warning, lane keeping aid, active steering assist, traffic sign recognition, and forward collision warning. There is also autonomous emergency braking (AEB), car, pedestrian and cyclist detection and junction turning assist.

For families there are two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points.

GWM offers a seven year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the Tank 300, as well as eight years of cover for the hybrid battery (also with no kilometre limit). There’s also seven years of roadside assistance thrown in, too.

Capped-price servicing is available for the first seven years, with the first service due at 12 months or 10,000km and subsequent services every 12 months of 15,000km after that. Prices for each service (in order) are: $320, $460, $460, $685, $685, $1075, and $370.

GWM has a network of 123 new-car dealerships able to handle servicing, and the company tells us that regional centres have not been forgotten.

The RAV4 is backed by Toyota’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which now sits slightly behind some rivals offering longer coverage (upwards of seven-years on some).

Servicing is more competitive. A five-year capped price program comes in at $1625, averaging $325 per visit, with intervals set at 12 months or 15,000km. That’s well priced for the segment.

You also get complimentary roadside assistance, which is service-activated, along with a one-year subscription to the 'myToyota Connect' app. This allows remote access to functions like climate control and locking or unlocking the vehicle, adding a layer of convenience.