Toyota RAV4 vs GWM Tank 300

What's the difference?

The RAV4 is undeniably better than the last generation, and brings with it a level of driving refinement the most popular car in the world should have.

It also levels up its tech without falling into the overcomplicated, messy systems newcomers to the market think will impress buyers. While the base GX is a sound option, the few extra mod cons in the GXL are worth the extra cash.

But its lack of ANCAP rating is surely a point of anxiety for Toyota, and while the safety systems seem sound, we can’t definitively say this RAV4 is as safe as Toyota claims it is.

If you’re willing to trust Toyota on that, you’ll find a very enjoyable car that’s uncomplicated and efficient. But if those five stars from ANCAP matter to you, give it a few months and see how the new RAV4 performs before you put your money down.

There’s a lot to like here. The GWM Tank 300 in any of its forms is a competent vehicle from the helm and backs up its off-road claims with real ability. The ride quality, in particular, is a highlight, and it’s a good size for couples or young families. Its value for money is also quite brilliant.

Add this plug-in hybrid driveline to the mix and the performance is quite astounding, while the petrol engine and EV potential have arrived at a critical point in history where such things carry more weight than ever before. It remains to be seen what happens globally and what effect that has on fuel prices, specifically the price gap between petrol and diesel. There’s also the question of what happens electronically when you dunk the Tank into Nolan’s Brook on the track to Cape York. But for now, this is a car whose time appears to have come.

But while the overall concept deserves praise, there’s still some work required in terms of the way the car drives and in its attempts at keeping its occupants safe. The calibration of both the throttle response and some of the driver aids is, frankly, in need of some final polish. And though it sounds odd, the Tank 300 would be a better thing to live with if GWM ditched the contentious driver aids and took the points hit on its ANCAP rating. Even better would be to stick with the tech but refine it to the point where it works in the background and not as an irritant.

Each RAV4 in the range is more visually distinct than before, but most variants feature a similar honeycomb grille that’s a departure from the ‘safe’ design language Toyota is known for.

The outlier is the Edge variant, which gets a more traditional front-end treatment as well as its 20mm wider wheel tracks to go along with the intended purpose of light off-roading.

Despite the fact Toyota has clearly tried not to change the new RAV4 too much in too many ways compared to the last generation (and why would you when it was already so popular), the new design feels a little more adventurous.

It includes elements of Toyota’s latest design language including the ‘c-shaped’ headlights and more streamlined tail-lights but retains the overall size and shape of the RAV4.

The RAV4 is 4600mm long, 1855mm wide and 1680mm tall, a very similar size to before and as such its interior feels similarly spacious.

Inside, the layout is tidy with a little more visual distinction for controls than the last-gen RAV4.

Updated, sleeker buttons and controls replace the ageing fixtures and large screens make the mid-size SUV feel much more up to modern standards.

Derivative is a strong word, but from most angles there’s a little bit of something else in the Tank 300’s exterior. We can easily see a bit of Suzuki Jimny in profile, and a dash of new Ford Bronco in the lights and grille. And if you squint there’s a blob of Jeep Wrangler in the wheel-arch extensions.

Which should mean it’s just a mash-up. Yet somehow, it isn’t, and the Tank has its own vibe.

Inside, that vibe suddenly becomes a bit overdone, and the plastic garnish above the glove box, in particular, looks like it will date pretty quickly (if it hasn't already). There's also a lot going on in here; this is a busy place and even the gear selector looks like a prop form the Star Wars franchise.

But despite the sleeker look inside the new RAV4, Toyota hasn’t fallen into the trap of shoving as many digital features into the system as possible.

Many newcomer brands create confusing digital environments by having menus upon menus filled with options and features, but Toyota has avoided this by retaining a simple, almost siloed system.

In the multimedia display, navigation, media, phone and settings are the key shortcuts visible down the side of the screen, though a customisable home screen allows you to make the system your own.

It’s far preferable to the many sub-menus and confusing layouts some manufacturers (especially newcomers) use, and means you’re able to focus on driving.

There are also still plenty of physical controls for the key functions of the car, no need to go into digital settings to sort your drive mode or climate.

The new system, dubbed 'Arene' by Toyota, is a much-needed update for the RAV4, bringing it into the current decade when it comes to tech.

Its voice command system is still a little too keen to interrupt, but the general function is extremely easy to get acquainted with.

The interior is also physically extremely sensible, with good vision and light thanks to a low dashboard and large windows, well-considered ergonomic positioning, comfortable seats and storage options.

The centre console storage bin lid is also able to be opened from either side, or removed and flipped between a hard plastic surface or cushioned elbow rest, though a bit of non-slip surface on the plastic side wouldn't go astray.

Behind the front seats, the second row passengers don’t have a massive amount of amenity, but are far from cramped. The vents, armrest with cupholder, bottle storage in the door and document holder on the backs of the seats are all quite standard, though the outboard seats are heated in the top spec Cruiser.

Behind that, a huge 705L of space in the boot includes a netted pocket if you opt for the Edge grade, plus there's a proper spare wheel under the boot floor. Wins all round.

While GWM is by no means the worst offender, we still reckon the Tank’s interior would be better without such a degree of reliance of touchscreens and menu-driven functionality. While it’s obvious that there’s a lot going on in the cabin, it still seems odd that important functions such as shifting from conventional hybrid mode to EV mode would require a dive through the on-screen menus when a simple switch would be faster, easier and simpler.

And even when GWM has provided switches, the end result is muddy. Take the volume controls for an example. There’s no central volume knob accessible by both front seat occupants, so you rely on the steering wheel mounted up and down buttons to change the volume. Except they’re not marked as volume controls in any specific way. Okay, if you know, you know. But if you don’t know, you’ve just missed the news headlines.

Overall, it's disappointing. And I resent the fact that GWM (or anybody else) thinks it’s okay for me to have to learn to operate a car all over again. The dashboard is also full of tiny symbols and lettering making things difficult to decipher if you normally wear glasses to read, but not to drive.

We’ll take issue with the indicator stalk, too, which has an indistinct feel when trying to discern whether you turned the indicators on for an intersection, or just tipped them on for three flashes for a lane change. And if you have accidentally gone too far and they’re still flashing away merrily after the lane change, turning them off manually is a lottery that might see you succeed, or mistakenly turn on the other side flashers.

The rest is better with proper buttons for the various off-road drive modes, diff locks and hill holder. There’s even an analogue clock for some real nostalgia. You’ll also find a single USB-A and USB-C charge port in the dash, and a pair of cupholders buried deep in the centre console which also has a lid and sliding drawer.

It’s obvious that this is a smaller vehicle than some, and the four-door layout dictates shorter doors. But that doesn’t alter the fact that the driver’s seat slides back a few centimetres every time you shut the car down. The trouble with that if you’re tall, is that the seat is now tucked back in behind the B-pillar, meaning you have to climb out and around it to exit the car. Perhaps you can switch off this slide-back function, but I didn’t have the spare hour to troll through the menus to do so. Oh, and there should be a driver’s grab handle on the A-pillar, too. There isn’t.

The rear seat is better with an adjustable backrest that provides proper comfort, and leg and knee room that hides the 300’s smaller dimensions well. There’s lots of glass and light and a pair of USB charge points. You also get a pair of rear reading lights and central vents, but no climate controls.

Even the cargo area is a decent size with the five seats in place (360 litres, up to 1520L with 60/40 rear seats lowered) but the under-floor storage space has been consumed by the hybrid battery, meaning the jack and tools and charging cable live in the cargo area and the spare tyre is bolted to the tailgate.

The single-piece tailgate is hinged at the side, and needs a fair bit of real estate to be swung open fully.

The Tank features vehicle-to-load capability, too, which means you can operate your power tools using the vehicle as the power source, and there’s a 220-volt socket in the luggage area to do just that. But when camping, too, this feature can also power induction cookers, microwaves, and all the other stuff you probably should have left at home. And if the hybrid battery runs out of charge, the Tank can run its petrol engine to act as a generator (your camping neighbours are going to love that).

The real gadget freaks out there can also download the Tank app which allows you to operate functions such as power windows, climate control, seat heaters, central locking and check your charging status all from the comfort of your smartphone. You can also use this functionality to flash the hazard lights to help spot your Tank from everybody else’s in the carpark.

The Tank 300 PHEV is available in two trim levels, starting with the Lux at $55,990 drive-away. That gets you 18-inch alloy wheels, roof rails and side steps and, perhaps a little surprisingly, a sunroof.

There’s also power folding mirrors, keyless entry and start, paddle shifters, adaptive cruise-control and a rear differential lock.

Inside, there are leather accents for the seats, a pair of 12.3-inch multimedia, ambient lighting, digital radio, wireless connectivity, wireless phone charging, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, automatic headlights, full LED lighting, and dual-zone climate control. That’s quite a bit of gear for the money.

But throw another four grand on the sales rep's desk, and you into the Ultra grade which adds heated, cooled and massaging front seats, eight-way power adjustment for the driver’s chair, Nappa leather inserts, underbody protection, a front differential lock and no less than 64 colour choices for the expanded ambient lighting package.

Fundamentally, then, your extra $4000 is buying the clever front seats and front diff lock, but that’s easily worth the money anyhow. That said, the entry-level variant is one of the better equipped at that price-point, so either way, you won’t be slumming it.

The 2.5-litre four-cylinder engine with series-parallel hybrid is less powerful than before, but Toyota says it did this for better efficiency and has made up for it with improvements to the battery and electric motors.

The figures are now 143kW and 221Nm (in 2WD and AWD variants), the power down from 160kW in the last generation. All RAV4s still use a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

Basically, lower numbers, but performance on par with the current RAV4 Hybrid according to Toyota.

The Tank’s plug-in driveline, starts with a petrol engine measuring 2.0-litres and contributing 180kW to the overall picture. But then there’s a single electric motor, sandwiched between the petrol engine and the nine-speed transmission. That means the Tank is still a mechanical four-wheel-drive platform, and when both powerplants are singing together, there’s an eye-opening 300kW and 750Nm of torque on tap.

The four-wheel-drive system operates as a rear-wheel drive on dry bitumen, and there’s the usual 4WD high range and 4WD low range. What there isn’t, is a 4WD-auto setting that allows you to use four-wheel drive in the dry on a paved road. That sounds minor, but for towing in particular, having all four wheels doing the driving is a major safety bonus.

All Tank 300s get a rear differential lock, but this version, the Ultra, also gets a locking front diff as well. Typically, the Tank also features a range of driving modes (no less than nine of them!) for the four-wheel-drive function, tailoring throttle, transmission and differential response according to the type of terrain being covered.

The Tank 300 is built the old fashioned way with a ladder-chassis upon which the body is bolted, and it still uses a live rear axle, too. But the front suspension is independent and the GWM uses coil springs rather than old-school leaf springs for much better ride quality.

The new RAV4’s efficiency is of much interest, obviously, and with figures claimed at 0.2L less per 100km over the last RAV4, it’s another case of incremental improvements.

The 2WD comes with a claimed 4.5L/100km, the AWD with 4.6L. During testing we saw numbers as low as 6.8L and 6.9L, respectively, and that was giving it the beans in some pretty twisty mountain roads.

Keep in mind the RAV4 needs 95 RON minimum now, rather than the 91 RON it could deal with before.

The headline number here is GWM’s official fuel consumption number of just 1.9 litres per 100km. Or it would be if it had anything to do with the real world. As it is, nobody is going to achieve that, and our mix of urban running netted an average of about 11.0 litres per 100km, with that dropping to 8.5 litres per 100km in country conditions.

The truth is, your consumption in this vehicle can go from zero to, say, 12 litres per 100km depending on how and where you drive and how much battery charge you have available.

Speaking of charging, the Tank 300 can use a commercial fast charger to absorb voltage at a rate of 50kW. At that rate, it can go from 30 to 80 per cent charged in about 24 minutes. A wall box (GWM offers one as a factory option) can take the 37.1kWh battery from 15 per cent to fully charged in 6.5 hours. And, of course, you can also charge the Tank from a domestic wall socket in a claimed 14.4 hours. We managed to add about 6km worth of charge per hour on such an outlet during our time with the car.

As far as range goes, GWM reckons there’s 115km (NEDC) of EV-only range, while starting a journey with a fully charged battery and a full 70-litre fuel tank should see you covering somewhere between 900 and 950km between top ups.

Put it this way - the RAV4 doesn’t feel like it’s lacking power. Despite the lower output, the new generation car doesn’t seem to struggle with having enough pick-up to keep moving along, even in spirited driving.

The first time I properly took off it surprised me with how punchy the response was. And from there on the new RAV continued to impress.

It’s one of a few things that, dare I say, makes the RAV4 rather fun to drive.

Like its predecessor, it’s built on the 'TNGA' platform, which underpins pretty much everything Toyota builds these days.

It’s a well-sorted basis for a car, making even this relatively large family SUV feel nimble.

Some changes to the suspension help here, too. New geometry and spring and damper rates mean the RAV4 is sharper and better controlled than before.

That control comes with the trade-off that it’s not always cloud-soft, but given Australian preferences and the need to keep the rubber on our rough as guts roads, Toyota has the balance right here.

It also hasn’t seemed to matter massively whether the RAV4 is front- or all-wheel drive even in the wet on twisty Tassie roads. The 2WD requires a little more care being flung into corners but the mid-sizer holds its own well enough.

There’s clearly more ability in the RAV4 than it’ll make known, almost as to keep the driver behaving safely just in case, while being confident in knowing the RAV4 is more capable than many will ever find out.

It’s handled high speeds, sharp corners and unsealed roads to a higher degree than anyone would reasonably expect of a family SUV.

It helps that the steering, throttle and braking are all well-calibrated. Planting your foot brings urgency without a jolt, there’s no guesswork in the steering and the brakes won’t have you lurching at a tap but can pull you up rather rapidly if needed.

It’s easy to drive, which is pretty big compliment and surely one of the key goals for the engineering team.

GWM claims a 0-100km/h acceleration time of just 6.3 seconds for the Tank 300 PHEV, and that’s impressive. There are two caveats here. The first is that you need at least 40 per cent battery charge on board to extract maximum thrust. And, secondly, even in those circumstances, the Tank never feels that brisk. It’s more effortless than genuinely rapid, although the torque up hills is genuinely impressive.

There’s no getting around the refinement inherent in using volts for some of the time. And when the petrol engine does chime in, it’s all but imperceptible. You’ll eventually hear the engine if you wring it right out, but even then, vibrations are minimal.

All in all, the Tank’s relatively compact dimensions work in its favour in an urban setting, and the range of camera views (including an off-road one showing you the obstacles you’re about to encounter) make parking a lot easier than it might have been. Only a high degree of distortion in the birds-eye-view camera mode takes a bit of getting used to.

On the move the ride quality is quite exceptional, and those coil springs really do make a difference. Even the usual council speed bumps don’t bother the Tank and the short wheelbase pitching we’ve seen in some similar vehicles just never emerges. Well chosen damper rates help, too, and there has been some Australian input into the way the Tank handles. It shows.

Steering, too, feels light and natural, although the almost constant fidgeting at the helm by the lane-keeping assistance program is annoying. And switching it off is not only a multi-button job, it needs to be done every time you start the vehicle.

Far and away the biggest hurdle in living with the Tank, however, is a throttle calibration that is way off the mark. Pressing the accelerator pedal initially doesn’t seem to do much at all, and then suddenly, the power comes in and you discover you’ve input too much throttle as the Tank surges away down the road, threatening to actually spin its tyres if there’s any gravel about. But not until that initial hesitation has caused the driver behind you to wonder aloud (I can lip-read) if you’re ever going to move at all. This needs to be fixed as a running change.

The all-important off-road driving experience is pretty sharp and the Tank 300 is a genuine competitor in this discipline. It’s extremely stable and capable on unsealed roads and tracks and the front and rear diff locks make it a proper adventurer’s rig.

It’s relatively demure dimensions also mean that it fits down the tracks and trails that have been created by decades of vehicles of a similar size, unlike some of the bigger new off-roaders we’re seeing that simply don’t fit in to the terrain so neatly.

Ultimately, the Tank’s stock tyres will be the limiting factor, but there are plenty of alternatives out there for a bit more off-road bite.

The Tank has a strong safety story to tell, especially on paper.

Regardless of what specification you buy, you’ll get seven airbags including full-length side-curtain bags and a centre airbag to reduce head injuries in a side-impact crash.

There are rear parking sensors, a range of camera angles including an overhead view, tyre-pressure monitoring, Isofix child-restraint mounts, and the usual driver aids including autonomous emergency braking, rear cross-traffic alert and braking, blind-spot monitoring, traffic-sign recognition and rear collision warning.

But away from the brochure, features such as the lane-keeping assistance and the driver-fatigue monitor need work on their calibration. GWM is by no means on its own here, but it’s a fact that some other makers do a better job of making this tech transparent and vastly less intrusive.

The original Tank 300 launched in Australia in 2022 scored five safety stars in ANCAP testing, and that rating has been carried over to this car.

Toyota’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty is not just disappointing compared to other mainstream brands, but should be much higher given the brand is the biggest in the country (and world) and trades on its reputation for reliability.

The warranty can be extended to seven years from delivery if you maintain your logbook servicing with Toyota dealerships, but even then it falls short of Nissan and Mitsubishi’s 10-year (also servicing-conditional) warranties.

Capped-price servicing costs $325 per service and is available for five years or 75,000km, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km.

Toyota boast a long-established national network of around 300 dealers covering all states and territories including major cities and key regional and rural centres.

GWM offers a seven year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the Tank 300, as well as eight years of cover for the hybrid battery (also with no kilometre limit). There’s also seven years of roadside assistance thrown in, too.

Capped-price servicing is available for the first seven years, with the first service due at 12 months or 10,000km and subsequent services every 12 months of 15,000km after that. Prices for each service (in order) are: $320, $460, $460, $685, $685, $1075, and $370.

GWM has a network of 123 new-car dealerships able to handle servicing, and the company tells us that regional centres have not been forgotten.