Denza B5 vs Gac Aion Ut

What's the difference?

Denza has made a huge statement with the B5 and for the most part the hype is deserved. It packs an incredible amount of luxury and tech inside and out which is even more surprising given the impressive asking price.

There are only a few flaws like the busy ride, over-the-top body roll and the occasional infotainment quirk. Hopefully these can be fixed with future over-the-air software updates.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The Aion UT is a cleverly-specified little hatchback and a great entry-point into electric motoring. The software needs a bit of work from a usability perspective, plus the spongy ride and cutesy styling might not be for everyone. 

However, with strong points including driving range, cabin space and value, there’s even a pitch for it in some cases to be an only car compared to most of its price rivals, which are more likely to be thought of as a second car runabout in a two-car garage.

The pick of the range is definitely the entry-level Premium. It comes in at a headline-grabbing price with specs to blow rivals out of the water, while only missing out on a few luxuries.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

It’s worth calling out straight away that the Denza B5 is essentially an SUV version of the BYD Shark 6 as the two share underpinnings, but it’s much more luxurious and blingy.

Externally it has a big, boxy and bluff design that helps it stand out on the road. It looks even tougher when the suspension is in its lifted mode.

I particularly like the front fascia with the big headlights and the prominent Denza badge on the grille, but there are some strange body creases around the side.

While the boxy looks make the B5 stand out, it’s not necessarily unique. There are elements that are reminiscent of the Land Rover Defender, plus many angles look similar to the GWM Tank 300.

Inside is where the luxe is dialled to the max. There are so many soft touches around the cabin that it makes a lovely place to spend time.

Additionally there is a lot of high-quality physical switchgear which is surprising given how prominent the large 15.6-inch central touchscreen is.

Lastly, I like how substantial many of the finishes are. There are large grab handles on either side of the dashboard which you do need to use to hoist yourself into the cabin, plus chunky interior door handle pulls that are satisfying to use.

GAC tells us the UT hatch was designed in Milan, Italy, but it also isn’t ashamed of the Chinese influence on its overall appearance, like the ultra-short bonnet and Chinese city-car style face.

Along the side it has a modern, aerodynamic profile, and the ultra-short overhangs and long wheelbase maximise the amount of room for batteries under the floor and interior space.

The rear feels a lot like a modern Mini, with its bulbous tailgate and protruding light clusters, spiced up with a sporty spoiler piece jutting out.

It’s not a bad looking thing and it’s available in an array of fun colours.

On the inside it seems to follow the established rule-book of Chinese automakers, with plush trims, big screens with minimal physical buttons as well as a contemporary two-spoke steering wheel.

There’s a trendy floating console which hosts the cupholders and wireless charger on the Luxury grade, and an array of interesting patterns and textures through the doors and dash which you wouldn’t have once seen on a car at this price-point.

However, it is worth noting that while the seats are quite nice, and the steering wheel is a stand-out touchpoint, the trims on the doors and across the dash-top are hard plastics, more so than some of this car’s rivals.

Many Chinese cars have lots of bling but lack actual substance when it comes to comfort and usability. This is where the Denza differs.

Take the driver’s seat, for example. In a number of Chinese cars they look plush and comfy, but in reality they are firm after longer drives and lack adjustability.

The B5’s driver’s seat, however, is very comfortable, offering almost limitless adjustment, plus heating, ventilation and even a massage function as standard. The latter is great for longer road trips.

Ahead of the driver the steering wheel has plenty of adjustment, allowing people of different heights and statures to get comfortable behind the wheel. There are also lots of physical buttons and switches that have a satisfying click when pressed.

The digital instrument cluster is high-resolution and clear, and there's a number of different informative pages that you can cycle through. It’s nice to have this level of customisation.

Moving across, the aforementioned 15.6-inch touchscreen multimedia system dominates the dashboard. If you’re familiar with the user interface in other BYD vehicles, it’s virtually identical in the B5.

It’s very easy to navigate around and if you do get lost there are a number of shortcut buttons at the bottom of the screen that can either take you back home or to other key functions.

One of my favourite features about the screen is the swipe-down control centre menu. You can customise it to have key shortcut functions. It’s much better than having to dig through countless submenus.

It’s clear Denza still has a few kinks to iron out with the translations from Chinese to English as some don’t make sense. Denza will likely sort this with future software updates.

As standard there is wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and it takes up the full screen when connected. It’s a stunning set-up, though reaching the far left-hand side of the screen from the driver’s seat can be a little tricky on the move.

As I touched on earlier, there is a lot of physical switchgear around the cabin which is helpful as you don’t need to solely rely on the touchscreen for key functions. The piano key buttons for the drive and EV/HEV modes are particularly handy, plus the rising gear shift lever is premium-feeling.

In terms of storage up front, there are up to two 50W wireless chargers (depending on the variant you opt for) with ventilation, two cupholders with adjustable depths, some shallow storage under the centre console, plus a fridge/hotbox under the centre armrest.

Moving to the second row there is plenty of space for at least two adults to sit comfortably. Pushing it to three may be a little tight with shoulder room, plus the centre seat is raised compared to the outboard ones. It’s worth noting though that there is a flat floor so you don’t need to fight for foot space.

Second-row amenities include chunky grab handles for easy ingress and egress, air vents on the back of the centre console, as well as heated and ventilated outboard seats in the top-spec Leopard trim. It’s properly luxe.

At the back the tailgate is side-hinged which can be problematic if you reverse into a carpark as you need to allow for space for it to open up. It has a soft-close function which is handy as you don’t need to slam it shut.

There’s 470L of boot space with the rear seats upright, expanding to around 1000L when folded. It’s a decent amount of space and is square with a very minimal load lip.

Amenities include a 12V socket, a wide array of hooks and nets, as well as a small storage space under the boot floor for the charging cables.

Lastly the B5 comes with a full-size spare wheel mounted on the tailgate. This is becoming increasingly rare in electrified vehicles and is very handy if you have a puncture.

In terms of interior space, the Aion UT stands out with its spacious cabin. At 182cm tall, I am easily able to find a comfortable seating position, and visibility out the front sides and rear, while not as good as some small SUVs, isn’t bad.

There’s lots of headroom, and while I mentioned the hard plastic door cards before, there’s enough padding everywhere your elbows are going to touch to make it feel a bit nicer than perhaps it is.

The main drawback of this car for me is the lack of tactile buttons and the frustrating software.

The main screen isn’t particularly well utilised, being taken up by either a background or the navigation map, with an array of typically small shortcuts across the bottom for important features like the climate control or settings menus.

You can pre-set a few information panels which sit above the shortcut bar as in many rival cars and there’s also a shortcut tray which can be hosted on the driver’s side and configured with a variety of shortcuts and settings.

It’s just a bit clumsy to use, and the array of poorly-labelled settings menus for things like active safety equipment feel needlessly complicated.

I’d love to see this car with physical controls for climate and multimedia to make it easier to live with.

Up front the storage is decent. There are big pockets in the doors and a large storage tray between the driver and front passenger thanks to a flat floor. There’s also a slightly weird storage box under the touchscreen which has a net inside, good for more delicate objects you don’t want flying around the cabin.

On the floating console there are two cupholders which are a bit too shallow for my liking, and the wireless charger feels almost pointless because its made of a hard plastic, so your phone just slides right off in the corners. The cabled outlets are hidden beneath which allows for tidy cable management and the centre armrest console box is a healthy size.

The rear seat is comparatively basic, although touches on the key points. Its main advantage is how generous the space is. My frame was able to fit behind my own driving position with heaps of room for my knees, and just enough room for my head despite the dip in the roof for the sunroof shade in the Luxury-grade car we tested. There may be even more headroom in the base car.

The flat floor makes the space useful even for three across in a pinch and there’s a drop-down armrest with (again, shallow) cupholders. There are pockets on the back of both front seats and smallish pockets in each door. The array of soft trims continues, too, and the back of the centre console features a partially adjustable air vent. Luxury spec cars get a single USB rear power outlet.

As with many Chinese cars in this segment, the generous rear seat space comes at a cost to the boot. It measures just 321 litres, which is slightly smaller than its main opponents in this category, although larger than some hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla, for example.

It has its advantages, though. The floor is two-tiered, and can offer a flat load area with the rear seats folded down, or a deeper boot in its lower position. Underneath there’s a cutaway good for charging equipment and the tyre repair kit (sorry, no spare wheel in here).

Unlike some EVs, the Aion UT doesn’t get a frunk (front boot) for additional storage.

The GAC Aion UT starts from $31,990, before on-road costs, for the entry-level Premium grade, which makes it the third-most affordable EV you can buy in Australia after the city-sized BYD Atto 1 and the entry-level version of the BYD Dolphin.

It sits closer to price-parity with the GWM Ora, but is significantly more affordable than the rear-drive MG4 and more spec-competitive top-grade BYD Dolphin.

The bigger threat to the Aion UT is that a lot of buyers will be willing to spend slightly more to get into one of the most affordable electric small SUVs, like the BYD Atto 2 or Jaecoo J5.

Still, GAC makes a solid pitch for its hatch, which offers a higher spec level than its most direct price rivals.

For example, the Aion UT is more powerful than the entry-level Dolphin and Ora while offering a higher level of interior equipment. 

Even the just-arrived front-drive MG4 Urban also starts at $31,990, but that’s for a version with significantly less driving range.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say the entry-level version of the Aion UT (the confusingly-named Premium) is probably the pick of the two variant range.

Standard equipment levels on this car include 17-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting all around, synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen with online connectivity and built-in nav as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also an 8.88-inch digital instrument cluster, heated steering wheel and the full array of safety kit.

With the same power and battery size, this leaves only arguably unnecessary luxuries for the Luxury grade, like a wireless phone charger, ventilated driver’s seat, auto dimming rear vision mirror with auto power folding wing mirrors, a powered tailgate and of course, a panoramic sunroof (with shade!).

Power comes from plug-in hybrid set-up combining dual electric motors (one on each axle) and a 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine.

It’s a similar set-up to the BYD Shark 6, but the B5 has more power. Total system outputs are a meaty 400kW and 760Nm, which is good for a claimed 0-100km/h sprint in just 4.8 seconds.

Power is sent to all four wheels and for added peace of mind off-road there are front and rear mechanical diff locks as standard, plus a wide range of drive and terrain modes, including a low-range mode.

Backing this up is a 3000kg braked towing capacity and up to 600kg of payload.

The Aion UT has a front-mounted electric motor producing 150kW/210Nm. That’s plenty punchy for any hatchback at this price, and I like the way the brand hasn’t messed around with a sub-100kW motor in the base variant to push prospects towards the top-spec car.

It’s more powerful than all of its closest rivals and at the time of writing you’ll have to spend four to six thousand dollars more to get into something equivalent from BYD, Chery, Jaecoo, Leapmotor or MG.

It even has a claimed 0-100km/h sprint time as low as 7.3 seconds.

Feeding the electric motors is a 31.8kWh lithium iron phosphate (LFP) Blade battery which Denza claims to allow the B5 to travel up to 100km on electric power alone, according to NEDC testing.

There’s also vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability with 6.6kW output through the charging port using an adapter. This allows you to use the battery charge to power appliances. It’s handy if you go camping, for example.

The battery can be AC charged at rates up to 11kW or DC fast-charged at rates up to 100kW.

There’s also an 83L fuel tank. Denza claims the B5 has a total range of 975km, according to NEDC testing.

Fuel consumption depends on whether or not you charge up the battery. Denza claims you’ll use 1.9L/100km from 100 to 25 per cent battery charge and 9.5L/100km under 25 per cent battery charge, both according to NEDC testing. Regardless, this is better than similarly sized diesel-powered SUVs.

The Aion UT has a 60kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack, which grants it a WLTP-certified 430km of driving range.

That’s more than its closest rivals, like the entry-level Ora Standard Range (310km), BYD Dolphin Essential (410km) or BYD Atto 2 (345km).

Claimed efficiency is 16.4kWh/100km and the car I tested returned a consumption of 14.0kWh/100km over a 130km route of mixed conditions, which isn’t bad at all.

Charging speeds are less impressive, but realistically appropriate for the relatively small battery. The peak DC charging capacity of 87kW means a charge time which the brand quotes at 24 minutes, but this is from 30-80 per cent. Expect closer to 40 minutes for a 10-80 per cent charge.

AC charging is decent, at 11kW. This should have you charging from 10-80 per cent between four and five hours.

Behind the wheel the Denza B5 primarily operates as an electric vehicle (EV) first up, meaning it’s largely quiet inside the cabin when driving around normally.

Once the charge starts to drop, the petrol engine typically switches on to top up the battery. It largely acts as a generator and a lot of the time you can’t actually tell whether it’s on or off.

In some cases where you floor the throttle or go up a steep hill, the engine revs can flare and that’s when it makes its presence known in the cabin.

When the battery charge gets down low enough and you gun it, the petrol engine can directly power the front wheels. This is rare though because the car purposefully leaves at least 25 per cent battery charge in reserve.

With 400kW and 760Nm thanks to the combination of the dual electric motors and the 1.5-litre turbo-petrol engine, the B5 absolutely hauls. The peppy feel is largely due to the instantaneous torque the electric motors provide.

However, in the standard drive mode there is a noticeable input lag from when you push the accelerator a bit harder and when the car actually accelerates. This is reduced in the sport drive mode.

Despite the juicy outputs, the B5 does feel its weight. When you accelerate hard it pitches back extensively, much like the Jeep Grand Cherokee Trackhawk. This never failed to make me smile though.

It’s surprising as we only drove the top-spec B5 Leopard on this launch and it comes fitted with the DiSus-P adaptive hydraulic suspension system which has a self-levelling function.

In the bends the B5 gets a considerable amount of body roll regardless of the drive mode. This is common for many Chinese cars as they typically prioritise floaty comfort-oriented tunes over a firmer and more dynamic-feeling ride.

Despite this, once it leans over it’ll comfortably hold and grip, largely thanks to the chunky 275/55 R20 Pirelli Scorpion tyres that come standard on the top-spec Leopard trim.

Like many body-on-frame vehicles, the ride gets busy on harsher roads with more frequent bumps. As a passenger you can get jostled about in the cabin.

The steering, while direct enough, can have a vague and artificial feeling. Depending on the drive mode it either artificially adds or reduces the resistance.

Unlike the related BYD Shark 6, the B5 gets a low-range mode which uses a clutch pack on the rear electric motor to allow for more controlled low-speed crawling, plus front and rear mechanical diff locks. This can make a big difference once the going gets really tough.

Additionally, the DiSus-P hydraulic suspension allows for a total of 140mm of travel. In the highest position there’s a wading depth of up to 790mm.

Lastly in terms of noise, vibration and harshness (NVH), the B5 is a very quiet car to drive. As I mentioned above, the electric-first nature automatically makes this a quiet car.

There is very little road and wind noise. This is surprising as the B5 is essentially a 3.0-tonne box on wheels. It seems Denza has put a lot of effort into sound insulation.

The drive experience can be where a lot of Chinese cars fall down but I walked away less frustrated by the Aion UT.

That’s not to say it will behave as you might expect a low-slung hatchback to. The suspension, for example, is extremely soft as it maintains its original Chinese-market state-of-tune.

This makes the car waft over imperfections on city roads. And in that sense it offers supreme ride comfort in the scenarios it was designed for. However, at the extremes, like some speed bumps, or particularly deep pot holes there can be a surprisingly violent re-bound sending a thud through the cabin.

The other trade-off for soft suspension is less body control. I was surprised to find that the Aion UT holds it together mostly well on a flat country B-road, but when undulations and big dips introduce themselves, the soft suspension can be too slow to react, making the car lose confidence in higher-speed open road scenarios we’re more used to in Australia.

The steering, like many electric cars in this category, is relatively heavily electrically assisted. This makes it light and easy to adjust at low speeds for easy park and maneuverability in the confines of a city. It loses a little bit of road-feel at higher speeds but the Aion UT’s steering is far from the least connected I’ve experienced recently.

One thing it can’t be criticised for is a lack of power. With 150kW instantaneously available the Aion UT has some serious poke and while the ChaoYang tyre package is tuned more for efficiency than grip, it’s again not one of the worst I’ve driven with.

One thing which helps the whole experience along is this car’s hatchback layout. With the weight of the battery low and squat and the wheels all the way out to the edges of the frame, the Aion UT inherently handles decently compared to an electric crossover or small SUV.

Like all Chinese cars, the UT has a host of occasionally frustrating driver aids, which you can read about in the Safety section below. While I was inclined to turn some of the features off after testing them, the alerts are relatively quiet and non-invasive.

Is the UT any good to drive? It’s not bad for the segment, I was largely pleased with how it handled and the power on offer, and while it still has its annoyances, they’re not big deal-breakers. 

The MG4 rear-drive is a better allrounder, while the GWM Ora isn’t as good. I’d say it’s on par with the BYD Dolphin, but they excel in different areas. The Dolphin's a bit sharper in terms of handling but the Aion UT is more comfortable.

As with many Chinese cars the list of active safety equipment is long but that doesn’t mean it’s particularly well calibrated.

Standard gear includes the key stuff like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. There are also rarer features for an affordable car like this including traffic sign recognition, door open warning, auto high beams and front cross-traffic alert.

On the parking front you get a 360-degree parking camera view as well as front and rear proximity sensors.

There's also an annoying driver monitoring system and one I haven’t seen much in the form of an occupant warning system, which seems to imagine you’re not wearing a seatbelt when you are.

It’s not the only safety system I found myself reaching to turn off. The lane keep assist could occasionally be a bit heavy-handed and the traffic sign alert was typically frustrating. This, sadly, is what we’ve come to expect from these types of systems from many Chinese automakers.

It’s not the most annoying system I’ve used, though, and the alerts are quiet enough and far enough apart that they aren't as intrusive as they can be in some rivals. You can also adjust the tolerance of some of the systems in the (needlessly complicated) menus to make them less annoying.

At the launch, the Aion UT was yet to be rated by ANCAP.

Denza B5 owners are covered by a six-year, 150,000km warranty, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered for eight years or 160,000km. Owners also receive three years of roadside assistance.

This warranty length is fairly standard in the mainstream segment, but in the luxury segment it pushes past the current five-year benchmark.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 20,000km, whichever comes first. The first five years of servicing totals $3542, which averages out to just over $700 per service. This does seem like a lot, but in the premium space this is rather competitive, especially once you consider both the electric and combustion components are being serviced.

There are currently seven Denza dealers around Australia and it plans to have a total of 20 by the end of 2026. It’s also planning to allow certain BYD dealers to service Denza cars.

GAC covers this electric hatch with an eight-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the brand’s “magazine battery 2.0” is covered by a separate eight-year and 200,000km warranty. Five years of roadside assistance is included.

The Aion UT needs to be serviced once a year or 15,000km. The service price schedule extends all the way out to 240,000km with yearly visits costing between $199 and $640 but for the life of the warranty the average yearly cost comes in at $352.

There are currently 19 GAC dealers in Australia, confined mainly to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane with a single store in Perth and an outlier in Cairns. No representation yet in Tassie, Canberra, the Northern Territory or SA.