Volkswagen Tayron vs Mazda CX-3

What's the difference?

So, does the new Volkswagen Tayron 195TSI R-Line sink or swim? It's definitely swimming as it delivers a solid blend of features and comforts for families seeking a 'sometime' seven-seater. It's not yet on the podium as it doesn’t hit every mark. Purchase price and servicing costs may put some buyers off but it packs in a number of thoughtful, family-oriented features. Whether it will go on to become Volkswagen’s standout seven-seat offering remains to be seen, but it’s a capable, well-rounded option in the segment.

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

The Tayron has a robust silhouette but avoids tipping into boxy territory. Its long wheelbase is balanced well by the overall shape and the large 20-inch alloy wheels give it a planted, purposeful stance. It’s a pleasant-looking family SUV, though it stops short of being particularly distinctive. Beyond the illuminated Volkswagen badges (which are a genuine highlight and lend the Tayron some subtle Tron-like flair) the design is fairly unassuming.

Inside, the Tayron makes its strongest impression after dark. Multiple illuminated panels with galaxy-like patterns add depth and visual interest, giving the cabin a sense of atmosphere that’s largely absent in daylight. There’s a reassuring mix of soft-touch surfaces and materials throughout. Suede-like microfleece and leather elements are used generously, contributing to a cabin that feels well made.

The black headliner is a win when you have kids but interestingly for a top-spec grade, there is no sunroof. The R-Line leather steering wheel looks the part and feels good in hand but aside from the expansive digital displays, the cabin lacks a clear focal point. A little more personality would have gone a long way toward elevating the cabin space.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

The Tayron’s cabin hits most of the right notes for a three-row family SUV. Space is strongest in the front and middle rows, with generous head and legroom accommodating taller passengers without issue. That said, the narrow centre armrest means the driver and front passenger end up quietly competing for elbow room on longer drives.

The electrically-adjustable front seats are the most comfortable place to be, particularly over distance. With heating, ventilation, massage and strong lumbar and under-thigh support, they reinforce the sense that this is the flagship grade.

Storage up front is more mixed. The door bins and glove box are on the larger side, but the centre console leans more towards tray than box. While the ‘hideaway’ dual wireless charging pads are a clever idea, accessing them means clearing whatever you’ve placed on the shelf above. A small drawer to the right of the steering wheel is a useful touch, though, and works well for a garage remote or wallet.

The second row is firmer and more bench-like, with seat backs that don’t offer much support in corners. Heated outboard seats are a welcome inclusion, but, much like the Tiguan Allspace, there are noticeable gaps of around 12cm between the seats and the doors. While the Tayron offers three top-tether anchor points across this row, fitting three child seats side by side would be challenging.

That said, amenities in the second row are plentiful. The transmission tunnel is relatively low, foot space is generous, and there’s no shortage of features to keep younger passengers comfortable. Map and device pockets, dedicated climate controls, two USB-C ports, retractable cupholders and manual sunblinds all feature. The sunblinds, in particular, are a road-trip essential when travelling with kids or a sleeping baby. The only frustration is that the climate and seat heating controls can occasionally lock, requiring access via the front touchscreen.

The third row is kid-coded because of the access and available legroom. There’s no footwell as the seat base sits fairly close to the floor, so knees are up. There are also no amenities aside from a single cupholder, so any novelty will quickly wear off even for younger kids.

Much of the Tayron’s functionality runs through the large 15-inch multimedia display, including climate control. The screen offers clear graphics and is mostly responsive, though some lag can occur on start-up. Built-in navigation is standard, along with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. CarPlay maintained a consistent connection and pairing was straightforward.

Practicality is rounded out by a well-shaped boot. With all seats in use, there’s 345L of cargo space which is enough for school bags and a grocery run. Fold the third row and capacity expands to 850L, which is better than several key rivals. The squared-off load area makes it easy to stack gear, and it comfortably swallowed a nine-year-old’s BMX bike and scooter without needing to fold the second row, which benefits from a versatile 40/20/40 split.

All grades come with a space-saver spare tyre, which is far preferable to a repair kit, and the R-Line adds a hands-free powered tailgate. Deep side pockets flanking the height-adjustable boot floor and a 12-volt socket round out a cargo area that feels genuinely family-friendly.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

Upon updating the Mazda CX-3, the Evolve variant is now a $32,100 ask before on-road costs, which is $900 more than before. It’s a little step up from the $30,370 entry price of the Pure, but falls well short of the top-spec Akari’s $38,890 sticker price.

The CX-3 range now comes with updated autonomous emergency braking and adaptive cruise control, with the Evolve specifically scoring new fog lights and keyless entry.

The Evolve also comes with black machined 18-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim and front parking sensors.

This is all on top of the CX-3’s standard kit which includes a leather-wrapped gear shift knob, handbrake handle and steering wheel, keyless start, an 8.0-inch multimedia display, wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto plus LED headlights, daytime running lights and tail-lights.

For its segment, the CX-3 isn’t cheap. The Evolve grade is more expensive than pretty much the entire line-ups of rivals like the Kia Stonic or Hyundai Venue, and its price somewhat lines up with the newer, hybrid-powered Toyota Yaris Cross.

But there’s more to the CX-3 than just a list of features.

For now, the R-Line sits at the top of the Tayron range and is the most powerful version available. It’s powered by a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine producing 195kW of power and 400Nm of torque, paired with a seven-speed auto transmission and all-wheel drive.

In isolation, and particularly against its key petrol-powered rivals, those figures stack up well. For everyday family duties, the combination feels suitably polished.

With a 2500kg braked trailer towing capacity, it's competitive for this segment and will be sufficient for many families towing medium-sized toys. That said, buyers coming from, or expecting, a Touareg replacement may notice the difference. The Tayron doesn’t match the larger SUV’s 3.5-tonne towing capability. And the larger capacity will be missed.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

Some of the Tayron’s key rivals lean on mild-hybrid assistance to improve fuel efficiency, and on paper they offer an advantage in this area. By comparison, the Tayron 195TSI R-Line sticks with a conventional petrol powertrain, so its efficiency figures are largely in line with what you’d expect given its size, weight and performance.

Volkswagen claims a combined (urban/extra-urban) fuel cycle figure of 8.6L/100km for this grade. With a 58-litre fuel tank, that translates to a theoretical driving range of up to 698km. In real-world use, after a mix of longer highway driving and some urban running, I recorded an average of 9.3L/100km, which feels reasonable rather than surprising.

Efficiency is an important consideration for families, particularly in this segment and it will be interesting to see how the upcoming hybrid powertrain performs once it arrives. For now, the R-Line’s fuel consumption feels broadly consistent with its output, even if it doesn’t lead the class.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

The R-Line’s engine is the standout in the Tayron range. It delivers solid, usable power with enough in reserve to make overtaking straightforward, particularly at highway speeds. While it doesn’t have the same effortless surge as the larger Touareg, it performs where it matters for everyday driving.

There is an occasional shudder through the front suspension and steering when entering a roundabout or turning off on a hill. It’s brief when it occurs, but noticeable and not something you expect to feel regularly in this class.

Suspension tuning is on the firmer side, though overall ride comfort remains acceptable. The Tayron provides decent road feedback without feeling unsettled or harsh. At higher speeds the cabin can sound slightly tinny, but around town it remains quiet and composed.

Steering response is direct without being heavy. The Tayron corners confidently for a vehicle of this size, but there is some body roll, which is most apparent for passengers in the back rows.

Forward and side visibility are strong, helped by a high seating position and unobtrusive pillars. Rearward visibility becomes more limited when the third row is in use, and a digital rear-view mirror would be a worthwhile addition.

With a 12.1m turning circle, the Tayron can feel large in tighter car parks, though it’s otherwise easy enough to park. The 'Park Assist' function and 360-degree camera system helps, even if image clarity falls short of what you’d expect from a flagship grade.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The Mazda CX-3 is technically unrated by ANCAP, though only because its original maximum five-star rating expired after seven years. While this means it easily passes many of ANCAP’s main criteria for safety (and strict Australian Design Rules - ADRs - to be able to be sold here), the CX-3 is missing some recent, more complex safety features.

Not everything is standard across the line-up, either. The Evolve misses out on adaptive headlights, a surround-view parking camera and traffic sign recognition. The base Pure variant also misses out on a front parking sensor.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other key features like seven airbags, dual-front and front-side plus curtain airbags spanning the sides. The CX-3 also has ABS and emergency braking with forward pedestrian detection and rear cross-traffic alert.

There’s lane departure warning, forward obstruction warning, blind-spot monitoring and a driver attention alert for those times you might miss something or - hopefully not often - are distracted.

All these systems are programmed well to minimise interference while driving, making the CX-3 refreshingly trusting of the driver to actually do the job of driving.

The Tayron is covered by Volkswagen's five-year/unlimited km warranty which is a shorter term than a lot of its rivals.

You can pre-purchase a three- or five-year servicing plan at $2207 or $4098, respectively, which isn’t as affordable as some rivals but does include roadside assistance. However, at the time of writing, the five-year price was set at $3550.

Servicing intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, with servicing available at any of VW's 118 official service centres nationwide.

The Tayron only accepts a minimum 95 RON unleaded petrol, which might sting a little with regular fill-ups.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.