Toyota Yaris Cross vs Mazda CX-30

What's the difference?

Going from dorky to dishy thanks to some clever detail changes, the GR Sport Hybrid certainly earns its place in the high-flying Yaris Cross range. For many buyers, that it also offers enough athleticism to match its newfound style seals the deal.

But not all the changes are welcome, especially as they upset the fine balance that the GX and GXL grades in particular possess in spades. The firmer suspension and bigger wheels have a harder time soaking up the rough stuff. Yet Toyota hasn't gone far enough, by failing to provide the extra go to match the extra show.

If none of these matter, then choose the GR Sport Hybrid and enjoy its many virtues, for the Yaris Cross' time is now and you won't really lose regardless.

I’m glad we checked in on our old friend, the Mazda CX-30. Despite being a car with two wheels planted in the future, and two firmly planted in the past, it manages to hold the line against many of its newer rivals, both on the cheaper and higher-tech end of the spectrum.

What you see really is what you get with this Mazda; it’s lovely to drive, looks fantastic, and punches above its weight when it comes to cabin ambiance. While what’s under the bonnet might no longer be in vogue, driving this car again has only reinforced its standing as small SUV royalty.

Back in October 2020 when the Yaris Cross landed in Australia, Toyota put interesting stats in the press kit showing how the original RAV4 5-door of 1995 compared with the newcomer.

Height-aside (by a substantial 70mm), the Yaris Cross is longer (by 55mm) and wider (+70mm), while its wheelbase and tracks are a whopping 150mm and 60mm more generous.

It's the last point that has us puzzled, because the Yaris Cross still seems a little tippy-toed in proportion, though the GR Sport does at least look better resolved with its larger alloys and lowered chassis.

And the smoked headlights and sad blacked-out grille still seem a bit dead-eyed and gormless. Not Toyota's prettiest styling effort, then.

That all said, the chunky shape and box-ticking crossover styling accoutrements seem to keep bringing people to showrooms in droves.

Finally, how Yaris is this, anyway? To refresh, compared to its supermini sibling namesake that uses the same GA-B 'Toyota New Global Architecture', the Yaris Cross sits higher off the ground and is longer and wider, as well as taller.

All in the name of a roomier body.

While the Haval Jolions of the world look ready to hit up the McDonald’s drive thru with their youthful flair, and cars like the Toyota Corolla Cross want to save money and dine at home with their conservative appearance, the Mazda CX-30 looks dressed to impress, as though it should be seen at the valet stand of your nearest Michelin-star restaurant.

A few years of age or not, the design of this car is still spectacular at this price, placing it right at the forefront of looks for the mainstream small SUV segment.

The delicate panel work, signature big grille, and large wheels at this Astina grade match nicely with the minimalist light fittings which themselves come complete with a soft-fade effect for the indicators.

It’s attention to detail like this which makes the CX-30 look like it belongs in a price-bracket above, and demands rivals pay attention.

The interior meets expectations, too, which is no small feat given some cars in this space prove it’s one thing to look great, and quite another to match it with a truly premium feel.

Mazda has done a fantastic job in the cabin which feels the part with an abundance of soft-touch materials, a dark, modern colour scheme, and an overall vibe which is ageing well even compared to more recently launched rivals.

I would go so far as to say, at the Astina grade the CX-30 feels more like it should be competing with Lexus, certainly punching above the mark, even at its mid-$40K price-point.

Very. As with all Yaris Cross models, the GR Sport Hybrid is designed to be easy to live with, with ample roof height, large doors and hip-level seating to aid entry/egress. No kneeling down to sit inside or hauling yourself up exiting this small SUV.

Comfy and embracing, the sporty front bucket seats seem to offer better support and location than the regular seats, and – as with the rest of the cabin's finish and ambience – are great to behold. It's smart and sassy in there.

Once settled in, the Japanese giant's smallest SUV continues to impress with its sense of space and pleasing all-round vision, making this seem larger than its city-slicker badge implies.

Nothing cramped or tight to report here – unless you're a basketballer perched high on the front passenger seat. Please, Toyota, provide the option of a lowering lever.

Aided by an amenable driving position, simplicity remains the name of the game, as demonstrated the tactile three-spoke wheel, wide adjustability of seating and steering column, unobstructed views of the attractive dash and effortless access to switchgear. If you run a driving school then here's a great lesson in elementary vehicle operation.

That said, the big digital speedo is not up high in the driver's direct sightline; you'll need to do a switcheroo with an Urban grade and its head-up display to remedy that, while the centre screen's layout can be a bit fiddly at first to figure out, though all necessary info is present.

With no shortage of storage, including 1.5-litre bottle-ready door bins and lots of areas to leave stuff in or on securely, effective ventilation and a sense of hardy quality, it's easy to imagine the Yaris Cross appealing to a broad array of buyers, whether singles, families or Empty Nesters.

It's that sort of do-it-all for less packaging that makes you question spending more for a larger SUV.

Downsides? As well as denying us front passenger seat height adjustment, Toyota seems to see no reason to provide its up-spec crossover with a front centre armrest, driver's seat lumbar support and wireless smartphone charger.

Maybe that's why the centre screen's graphics are so Nokia-esque. Plus, rear vision is hindered by fixed tombstone-style headrests out back. Remember when carmakers used to hollow them out to avoid such blind spots?

The Yaris Cross' rear-seat area benefits from lofty seating, a high ceiling to clear scalps, reasonable kneeroom and space beneath the front seats for big boots to tuck in under. But we'd think twice about squeezing three larger people abreast as shoulders and thighs would likely rub.

Still, outboard-sited passengers should rate the well-angled backrests and shapely cushion offering sufficient thigh support. Note that nothing slides or reclines back there.

Other observations? The 40/20/40 backrest's middle portion folds to reveal a pair of cupholders, like in a BMW. Useful, too, are more bottle-friendly door storage (up to 600ml), reading lights, a single map pocket, two coat hooks and auto up/down electric windows.

Some might miss the lack of face-level air vents, though nobody complained about it being stuffy back there.

Moving to the luggage compartment, a flimsy, fiddly, foldable fabric mesh cover is your only defence from prying eyes, and this is a poor substitute for a parcel shelf; Toyota, if you must, please check out how Honda's Civic does it.

Otherwise, the news is positive, due to a sizeable loading cavity, long flat floor and VDA-rated luggage capacity of up to 390L with rear seatbacks up in situ.

Check out the novel 60/40-split false floor, which provides some degree of extra out-of-sight security as well as loading versatility.

As with all Yaris Cross 2WDs, there's a space-saver spare below that. Going AWD means you'll have to put up with a tyre-repair kit – something we'd not inflict on anybody - as well as a substantially smaller cargo capacity (down to just 314L VDA).

Overall, with its subtle yet effective sporty accents and tasteful trim choices, the GR Sport Hybrid enhances an already generally thoughtfully presented and executed Yaris Cross interior.

It looks good and feels good, but is it practical? While the CX-30 is larger than its smaller CX-3 sibling, it still leaves space to be desired, especially compared to some other segment-bending small SUVs it competes with.

The front seat is not where the bad news starts though. It feels spacious enough inside for a couple, with large seats, plenty of space separating the front two occupants, and plenty of comfort on offer with padded armrests on both sides.

There are big bottle holders in the doors and in a flip-open bay in the console (wouldn’t want to interrupt this design… ), and there’s additional storage once you slide and flip open the armrest.

To keep things tidy, your USB and 12V power connections are also located in the console bay. No need for messy cables, and there’s a little divider, too.

On the downside here, there’s a chunk of dead space under the climate unit, which looks like it could be filled with a shelf or, better yet, wireless charger. As it is, it’s just a plastic panel with a small bay underneath which barely fits a phone.

Adjustability is great for the driver, with a reach- and tilt-adjustable steering wheel, and high belt-line offering a sporty hatch-like feel, which I instantly felt comfortable with.

The rear seat isn’t as impressive. While the fancy seat trim and soft-touch points mostly continue, some of the padding in the doors has been replaced with hard plastic, and there’s a raise in the floor to facilitate all-wheel drive on some variants which eats into the centre occupant’s foot space.

Behind my own seating position, my knees have a tiny amount of room, and so does my head, at 182cm tall. Technically, I fit, but it’s close, and feels it.

Rear occupants get a padded drop-down armrest with two bottle holders, an extra two surprisingly large ones in the doors, but no power outlets. There are two adjustable air vents on the back of the centre console.

The coupe-like design also has a cost when it comes to boot space. There’s 317-litres (VDA) of space available, although we could only fit the CarsGuide luggage set when the parcel shelf was removed.

The space is suitable for a couple on a weekend adventure, but a bit tight if you have more requirements, like a pram-age child, for example.

There is an under-floor space which houses a space-saver spare wheel and part of the Bose sound system.

When Mazda started what seemed like a push upmarket at the time, the CX-30 was an expensive small SUV. The intention with this car’s look and feel seemed to match the pricing, though, so we all thought Mazda was trying to establish a new semi-premium positioning.

As fate would have it, though, through a pandemic and various fluctuations when it comes to supply and raw material costs, every other manufacturer in this mainstream small SUV space has pushed up the price-scale, too, now making even the more expensive versions of the CX-30 look not so bad value after all.

The specific version we have for this test is the top-trim Astina, using the larger 2.5-litre engine in front-wheel drive form.

The CX-30 range is expansive and confusing, because you can also have an Astina with the smaller 2.0-litre engine, or in all-wheel drive, or even with Mazda’s odd new ‘X20’ engine option which is effectively a supercharged compression-ignition science experiment.

This front-drive 2.5-litre version is probably the pick of the Astina bunch, though, offering the larger engine without the weight or unnecessary cost of all-wheel drive.

Wearing a before on-roads price-tag of $43,310, it now goes into battle with the surprisingly expensive Toyota Corolla Cross (Atmos FWD - $43,550), Honda HR-V (e:HEV L - $47,000), Volkswagen T-Roc (R-Line AWD - $45,200), and the almost as expensive top-spec Kia Seltos (GT-Line FWD - $41,500).

Of course, if these prices, which will approach $50K once you factor in on-road costs, are making you wince, there’s always the more affordable Haval Jolion (from $36,990 for an equivalent high-spec S) or the MG ZST (from $34,990 for an equivalent Essence) from China.

If you’re thinking neither will hold a candle to the Mazda’s dynamics or quality, you’d be right. Read on to learn why.

Before we go on, though, at this Astina grade equipment includes 18-inch alloy wheels, an 8.8-inch multimedia panel with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, LED headlights, a sunroof, heated front seats with power adjust for the driver, a 7.0-inch digital instrument element, surprisingly nice leather interior trim for the seats and wheel, dual-zone climate, a head-up display, and a 360-degree parking camera.

Interesting omissions at this price include a wireless charger, wireless phone mirroring, USB-C connectivity, and while there’s a great safety suite included, there’s also no true hybrid option in the CX-30 range.

Just as with the regular Yaris Cross as well as all Toyota hybrids sold in Australia since 2001, the GR Sport Hybrid is a series-parallel set-up.

It features a 1.5-litre, three-cylinder, naturally-aspirated petrol engine dubbed 'M15A-FXE', making 67kW of power at 5500rpm and 120Nm of torque between 3800rpm and 4800rpm.

That's backed up by an 85kW permanent magnet synchronous motor, producing 59kW of power and 141Nm of torque, with electricity stored in a 4.3Ah lithium-ion battery pack.

Charging is via the petrol engine and recuperated energy from braking. There's no plug-in facility, while pure-electric drive is only offered during low-speed light-throttle driving for short bursts, or during off-throttle coasting where conditions are right.

Drive is sent to the front wheels via an electronic continuously variable transmission (CVT) offering a 10-speed manual sequential mode as well as a mechanical first gear for a more natural torque-converter automatic gearbox experience. Less prone to engine droning that way.

Weighing in at around 1235kg (kerb), the GR Sport Hybrid has a power-to-weight ratio of 68.8kW per tonne, which is okay.

Supporting this Yaris Cross' sporty aspirations, the MacPherson-style strut-front and torsion beam rear suspension tune sees a 10mm drop, resulting in a ride height of 160mm and a lower centre of gravity.

This, along with revised suspension components and additional underfloor bracing for increased stiffness and rigidity, are claimed to benefit steering, handling, body control and ride comfort capabilities.

But we're unsure whether the benefits are felt in equal measures – or at all, in some cases.

This is where the Mazda is really showing its age. G25 variants are powered by a 2.5-litre four-cylinder engine, which isn’t turbocharged, nor is it assisted at the wheels by electric motors in a hybrid arrangement.

It’s punchy enough to keep the pace with most of its turbo rivals, putting out 139kW/252Nm, and some will love the fact it’s paired with a traditional torque converter automatic instead of a rubbery continuously variable or glitchy dual-clutch set-up, but it’s certainly not for the eco-conscious.

Not only is it a relatively large displacement engine, but aside from a start-stop system there’s little to mitigate your emissions. In fact, this unit only complies with Euro 5 emissions regulations, well behind the pace today.

Like all Yaris Cross hybrids, the GR Sport officially averages just 3.8 litres per 100km on the combined cycle. That translates to 86 grams per kilometre of carbon-dioxide emissions. There's another reason why this Toyota is such a smash hit.

We didn't quite manage that, predictably, but the 4.7L/100km we did achieve beat the in-car trip computer. That's a rarity. And unlike some larger Toyota hybrids, this one can run on standard 91 RON unleaded as well as 94 RON E10 ethanol-mix petrol.

Using the official fuel consumption average, expect to achieve nearly 950km of range between refills of the 36L fuel tank. Note there is practically no pure-EV range available in this system of hybrid.

Whichever way you look at it, the Yaris Cross is about as economical as petrol-powered small SUVs get.

Some bad news, of course, comes at the fuel pump. The official claim for this relatively large engine is a bit bold, at 6.8L/100km on the ADR combined cycle, but if you’re using it for mainly urban duties as we did for this review I wouldn’t be surprised to see figures more in the region between 8.0 and 9.0L/100km.

As it stands, our car produced an average of 7.8L/100km, which is better than expected, but still painful in the era of hybrids and fuel-sipping turbos, especially when fuel is close to $2.00 a litre in most capital cities.

Mercifully, the lack of complexity from this engine does mean you can put bog-standard 91 RON unleaded in the tank.

We've driven every version of the Yaris Cross since its late 2020 launch in Australia, and without hesitation, the GR Sport is the least impressive of an otherwise great range of small SUVs.

And nowhere is that more evident than in the way it behaves around town.

As its creators intended, the Yaris Cross was born to be an urbanite. Lofty seating, good visibility, zippy acceleration, strong brakes, a tight turning circle and – in the base GX and mid-spec GXL on 16-inch wheels and tyres – a decent level of isolation from road bumps are key and very desirable attributes for city and suburban commuting.

Tick the hybrid box and the added electrical oomph and occasional silent running that electrification brings just add to the Toyota SUV's appeal in these circumstances.

Now, what you gain in style, stance and better tyre grip in the Urban, wearing the 18-inch wheels, you lose in ride comfort over bad roads due to an underlying firmness, and increased road noise intrusion over some coarse surfaces.

However, with its 10mm lower ride height and sports-tuned suspension, the GR Sport is firmer and louder again, and that detracts from its comfort and refinement.

Not to the degree that it's a deal-breaker, because the basics are still there and the Yaris Cross DNA remains, but there are marked differences between the grades.

If most of your driving is urban, you might want to rethink the GR Sport as a result unless the roads you commute on are smooth, because you'll barely notice the improved handling and body control at lower speeds that this grade specialises in.

Driving away onto rural roads, however, reveals a slightly more solid and focused handling machine, with quite direct (if not very tactile) steering through fast tight turns, accompanied by a flat and neutral attitude.

In other words, you can point and shoot a GR Sport up a mountain road with the confidence that it will steer and hold the road calmly and in control, even at speed.

So composed is this version of the Yaris Cross that, on a couple of occasions, we were surprised at how high our corner exit speeds were. Dynamically this is a warm-hatch-like crossover.

Which makes the lack of any power or torque increase over regular hybrid grades all the more disappointing and a missed opportunity. The chassis is clearly up for more muscle.

Yes, as per all Yaris Cross hybrids, the GR Sport is quick off the mark, smooth in its seamless delivery of power, regardless of whether it's petrol or electricity sourced, and eager to respond to throttle inputs.

This is rapid around town and speedy on the motorway. But we'd like a bit more punch to go with the added sporty visual panache.

On our final day of testing, rain washed away weeks of dry, dust and humidity, and the roads became treacherously slick, testing the mettle of many.

Despite being front-drive, the GR Sport continued to be in total command with its grip and braking abilities, but the added surety of AWD that the identically-priced GXL would have brought cannot be denied.

In other words, the GR Sport is best where it can be enjoyed – out away from the city and on good roads. Otherwise, there are better choices within the Yaris Cross range.

The CX-30 is awesome to drive. In a sea of lacklustre small SUVs, it’s instantly easy to connect with this Mazda. Yes, the engine and transmission here aren’t the most recent additions to the landscape, but they are predictable, smooth, and easy to deal with.

In fact, one thing Mazda is particularly good at is making its entire range feel homogenous in terms of the drive experience, maintaining the great dynamics which the brand has become synonymous with.

The touchpoints continue to be fantastic on the move. The steering feels light and easy to turn at low speeds, but becomes purposeful and full of feel at higher speeds.

The direct feedback on offer from the rack and the firm springs up front give a great handle on what the front wheels are doing.

The overall feel is firm and reactive, ready for action, and while not everyone will love the hard edge to the suspension, it helps the car feel springy and agile in the corners.

You can feel the Mazda 3 DNA on full display when you’re driving this car in haste, and it’s a kind of dynamism which most rivals can’t match, even if the Mazda’s drivetrain is feeling a little low-tech.

You certainly don’t need to worry about the six-speed transmission, which is a smooth-shifting unit.

There’s no glitchy behaviour on hills or from a stop like you might get in a dual-clutch, or rubbery surging under acceleration often delivered by a CVT, just the feeling of the car riding each gear out, and shifting between clearly defined ratios.

Drivers of older vehicles especially will appreciate its instantly familiar feel.

Ergonomically, it’s pretty straightforward, with the one major downside being the dial set-up. We like physical controls rather than touch controls, but Mazda has taken this to the extreme by not making the main multimedia screen a touch unit.

Instead, you’re forced to negotiate with phone mirroring software using a rotary dial, which is at best clumsy, and at worst distracting.

It’s also a tad difficult to see over this car’s high beltline, making it hard to tell where the corners are, front and rear, and a common Mazda problem is the wing mirrors which seem to have a zoom factor on them. Why? It limits your view into the lanes next to you.

Thankfully the active safety suite spends most of its time in the background and unlike some more recent offerings in the small SUV space, not interfering with the excellent drive experience.

The lane keep software is light handed, and the driver monitoring tech is more basic, which is honestly all you should need.

Overall then, the CX-30 is predictable, familiar, and has a fantastic quality to its handling which fits the Mazda brand promise.

Aside from a few blemishes then, it’s one of the best cars to drive in the segment, just don’t expect it to feel as cutting-edge as it could.

I love the lack of invasive safety tech in the CX-30, but that’s not to say this car lacks any of the required gear.

Active equipment includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring with rear- and front-cross traffic alert, adaptive cruise control, adaptive high-beams, driver attention alert, and traffic sign recognition.

You also score a very nice 360-degree parking camera and sensors, as well as a suite of seven airbags.

The CX-30 scored particularly highly across all of ANCAP’s testing criteria, with a particularly impressive 99 per cent in adult occupant protection. It achieved this rating in 2020.

Toyota offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty – with the option of extending that to seven years – as well as roadside assistance.

Service intervals are at 12 months or 15,000km. The first five scheduled services are capped at $250 each, with the work carried out detailed online.

The engine and transmission are under a seven-year warranty, while the hybrid battery pack is up to 10 years as long as the owner undertakes an annual inspection "... as part of routine maintenance according to the vehicle logbook."

As with all Mazdas, the ownership proposition is pretty straightforward. There’s five years of warranty, five years of roadside assist, and five years of capped price servicing.

Service costs are pretty tame, too, with our front-drive G25 Astina working out to an average of $360 per year for the first five years.

You’ll need to visit a workshop once every 10,000km or 12 months, whichever comes first.