Toyota Yaris Cross vs Mazda CX-5

What's the difference?

The Toyota Yaris Cross Urban is a city-savvy SUV that’s easy to park, nimble in traffic, and relatively fun to drive. It’s cute as a button on the outside, but the cabin doesn’t quite match the price, and some of the tech feels a little behind the times compared to rivals. The hybrid powertrain definitely earns it points but is it worth the jump in price over its rivals? A hesitant yes, because who doesn't like efficiency? But it needs a cabin upgrade to stay truly competitive in our market.

The Mazda CX-5 Evolve kicks some goals and with its comfortable on-road handling, robust safety equipment and practical interior, it’s still a solid choice for families looking for a mid-sized SUV. The only thing it’s missing is a hybrid powertrain, which would make this already well-rounded package even more compelling.

The Yaris Cross is genuinely adorable. It's compact enough to slip into tight city spaces, yet proportioned well enough that it never looks toy-like. Its upright stance gives it a bit of attitude, and the chunky black plastic moulding around the base actually works in its favour, adding a tough, almost adventurous edge.

The rear is one of its best angles, with crisp LED tail-lights and a clean, sculpted shape that gives it more presence than you’d expect from something this small.

Inside, though, things don’t climb to the same heights. There’s a lot of hard plastic throughout, and while the synthetic leather and cloth upholstery looks decent, it doesn't elevate the space. The tech is well positioned and the layout is tidy, making it a pleasant cabin overall but there’s an unmistakable sense of 'nice, but not quite enough,' especially given what you’re paying.

The next-generation Mazda CX-5 is bigger than before, but it retains the sleek body lines and understated styling that have made it such a handsome SUV. The wider front end and repositioned grille give it a more purposeful look than the outgoing model, while the 17-inch alloy wheels keep things suitably restrained.

Inside, the cabin doesn’t feel too basic despite the cloth upholstery. There are plenty of soft-touch materials, a pleasant dashboard and some new technology, including the 12.9-inch multimedia display. You lose most of the physical buttons, though, so there’s a little less of that traditional Mazda tactility.

The fabric seats are cosy and the extra interior space is definitely noticeable. Overall, there is still an understated elegance to the CX-5’s cabin.

The front row is easily the best place to be, with the most comfort and creature comforts on offer. Only the driver’s seat is powered, and the controls not the most intuitive to use but both seats have decent padding and single-level heating that makes longer drives more bearable. The new centre armrest feels like an afterthought as it sits too low and tilts too far forward to be truly comfortable.

The rear row is cosy and realistically suited to two adults. Behind my driving position (I’m 168cm), there’s enough knee and head room, but the smaller door apertures may make loading child seats a bit fiddly. You do get two ISOFIX points and three top tethers, but two seats will fit best. My nine-year old loves how light the doors are to open and close, though he isn’t thrilled about the taller windowsills as they block a fair bit of the outside world for smaller passengers.

Storage is better than expected up front with a mid-size glovebox, a storage tray underneath the air-vents and climate control panel. There are two cupholders and drink bottle holders in each row and the rear also gets a single map pocket.

The 8.0-inch media display shares is straightforward to use and the touchscreen is responsive. It’s easy to connect to the wireless Apple CarPlay and it maintained a steady connection all week. The basic sound system can sound a bit tinny when you’re full-pelt on the highway but is otherwise sufficient.

You miss out on a wireless charging pad on all grade levels, which I really missed, and the only two USB-C ports in the car are up front.

Boot space depends on the drivetrain. The front-wheel-drive Urban has a decent 390L, which feels competitive. The Stonic can take 352L. The all-wheel-drive version offers less at 314L, which is smaller than the Juke (422L).

In real-world terms, groceries, school gear and my son’s extracurricular chaos all fit without complaint. You also get an adjustable boot floor, a temporary spare wheel (not always a given in a hybrid) and a powered tailgate for extra convenience.

The front seats are a particularly comfortable place to spend time, with wide seat bases and plenty of elbow room. Getting in and out is easy thanks to the wide door apertures and 205mm of ground clearance and there’s enough space to settle in for a longer journey.

There’s also plenty of useful storage up front, including a large glove box, dual-opening centre console, cupholders and bottle holders, plus a dedicated phone tray with wireless charging. You get a 12-volt socket and two USB-C ports for keeping everything else topped up.

The 12.9-inch multimedia screen replaces Mazda’s familiar rotary selector with touchscreen operation, which I find easier to use. The updated operating system takes a little while to get your head around and there’s no native sat nav, but otherwise it feels functional and fresh for the new-generation model. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard, with CarPlay maintaining a solid connection throughout my week.

The extra size of this next-generation model is more noticeable in the back, where improved leg- and headroom is good news for taller adults on longer trips. The rear doors open to almost 90 degrees, making it easier to access the ISOFIX child-seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points.

There’s not a huge amount of extra family-focused kit back in the rear row, but you do get directional air vents, storage bins in each door and a centre armrest with cupholders. My nine-year-old was comfortable, although he did point out the lack of a charging port during a road trip.

And, as a parent, I had one other gripe: keeping the fabric seats clean from my kid’s shoes in rainy weather. Let’s just say some seat covers might be a worthwhile investment.

The boot offers up to 466L with all seats in use. That’s not the largest capacity in the class, but it was more than enough for my little family of three this week. I like the level loading floor, although the boot itself is quite tall, which can make lifting heavier items in and out a little awkward.

I’m also pleased to see a spare tyre, even if it is only a space-saver. And while a powered tailgate would be handy, at this price point I don’t think you’ll really miss it... until you’re standing there with your hands full!

There are five variants available for the third-generation Mazda CX-5, and we’re in the second-from-base Evolve grade for this review. It has a competitive $42,990, before on-road costs price, which puts it neatly among its key rivals. The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid starts at $42,850, while the Kia Sportage SX+ petrol begins at $45,580 and the Toyota RAV4 GX 2WD Hybrid at $45,990, all before on-road costs.

On price alone, the CX-5 looks well placed. But there’s one notable difference - all three rivals offer hybrid powertrains in their respective ranges, while the CX-5 currently does not. And as hybrid power becomes increasingly common in this segment, that omission could prove harder for Mazda to overlook.

The Evolve grade enjoys some solid features though, including:

• Heated front seats
• 12.9-inch multimedia touchscreen
• 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster
• Wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto
• Bluetooth
• AM/FM/digital radio
• Leather steering wheel
• Dual-zone climate control
• Two 12-volt sockets
• Wired/wireless phone charging
• Cloth seats
• Keyless entry
• Keyless start
• Rain-sensing wipers
• Electric/auto-folding side mirrors
• LED headlights
• LED DRLs
• Reversing camera

All Yaris Cross variants share the same 1.5-litre three-cylinder hybrid setup, producing 85kW of power combined and 120Nm of torque from the petrol engine. Toyota does not provide combined torque figures for its hybrid powertrains.

On paper, those numbers look a bit anaemic but in practice the hybrid system does a good job of masking the low torque. Around town, it feels livelier than you’d expect, with that electric assist giving it just enough punch to feel almost spritely off the line.

Our test car is the front-wheel-drive version, but you can opt for all-wheel drive for a couple of grand extra.

Compared with rivals, the Yaris Cross lands in an interesting middle ground. The Nissan Juke makes 84kW of power, while the Kia Stonic sits at 74kW.

And that’s really where the critique lands, because while the Yaris Cross feels zippy and eager at low speeds thanks to the hybrid boost, once you’re outside the city the torque deficit becomes harder to ignore. Overtaking and keeping up to speed aren’t the real issues - it’s more that the engine starts to whine like it’s under a bit of duress when you ask for more.

The CX-5 is all-wheel drive and powered by a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine producing 132kW of power and 242Nm of torque. It has a braked towing capacity of up to 1800kg, giving you the option of some light towing on the weekends, while the six-speed automatic transmission shifts smoothly through its gears.

But there’s no escaping the fact that most of its key rivals now offer hybrid powertrains, and you can feel the absence of one here. The CX-5’s petrol engine is perfectly capable, but it doesn’t have the same efficiency advantage that many buyers in this segment are increasingly looking for.

The Urban FWD has an impressively low claimed combined fuel consumption of 3.8L/100km, and with its 36L fuel tank, you’re looking at a theoretical driving range of up to 950km, which isn't bad for an urban trawler. In real-world use, including longer highway trips and everyday city errands, I averaged 4.4L/100km, which is still very efficient.

By comparison, the Nissan Juke Ti uses 5.8L/100km with a 46L tank, while the Kia Stonic GT-Line sits at 5.4L/100km with 45L. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses 5.4L as well.

The Yaris Cross not only sips fuel but makes the most of its smaller tank, which means the hybrid powertrain wins this round.

The CX-5 has a 58-litre fuel tank and claimed combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption of 7.4L/100km, giving it a theoretical driving range of up to 783km. That’s a solid range for a family-sized SUV and means you won’t be constantly thinking about your next fuel stop.

My real-world fuel use settled at 7.8L/100km after a week of longer highway stints and urban trawls, so it’s not too far off Mazda’s official number.

Still, this is where I’d like to see a hybrid powertrain join the CX-5 range. The fuel economy is reasonable, but with so many rivals now offering hybrid options, Mazda is starting to leave some efficiency gains on the table.

Power delivery is crisp and punctual, and while the engine can sound strained when you push it on the open road, it rarely translates into any noticeable lag. You won’t feel deep reserves of power, but there’s enough to keep up with traffic and overtake when needed.

Ride comfort is better than expected, with suspension that soaks up smaller bumps, and it corners confidently without too much body roll. The cabin picks up a lot of road noise, and there’s an annoying electric whine at lower speeds but it's easily drowned out with music.

Steering is on the lighter side but remains responsive, making the Yaris Cross genuinely easy to drive. It would make a great first car, or a simple, fuss-free choice for an older couple.

Visibility is excellent, giving you a solid sense of the car’s dimensions which is a big help when manoeuvring and that's even before you look at the 360-degree camera feed. Add in the small 10.6m turning circle, and parking this SUV is almost effortless. If you struggle, it’s not the car’s fault.

The CX-5 feels composed around town, with power delivered smoothly for everyday driving. But when you need to punch it off the mark, there’s some noticeable lag, and you have to work the engine harder to find the power when tackling a steeper hill at higher speeds. It’s capable enough, but it can feel like you’re asking a little more of it than you should.

The suspension has a firm edge to it, but I like how responsive the steering feels. The CX-5 is genuinely enjoyable through corners, with a dynamic feel and very little body roll.

The cabin is also impressively quiet, with minimal road or wind noise creeping in at higher speeds. Visibility is good through the front and sides, although the A-pillar can get in the way at times.

The reversing camera provides a clear view, while front and rear parking sensors make manoeuvring easier. Overall, it’s not a difficult SUV to park, despite its larger dimensions.

The Mazda CX-5 has a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating from testing conducted in 2025, with strong results across all four assessment categories.

It scored 90 per cent for adult occupant protection, 91 per cent for child occupant protection, 93 per cent for vulnerable road user protection and 87 per cent for its safety assist systems.

Other equipment include:

• 10 airbags
• Blind-spot monitoring
• ISOFIX child seat mounts
• Three top-tether anchor points
• Driver attention alert
• Driver monitoring
• Front collision warning
• Front cross-traffic alert
• Lane departure alert
• Lane keeping aid
• Rear cross-traffic alert
• Reversing camera
• Traffic sign recognition
• Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) - operational from 0-180km/h.

The Yaris Cross comes with Toyota’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, extendable up to seven years if you stick to servicing at a Toyota centre. That makes it more competitive as the Nissan Juke offers a 10-year term and the Kia Stonic comes standard with seven years.

Servicing is also straightforward and affordable, thanks to Toyota’s five-year capped-price program, with each service costing just $255. Intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

The CX-5 is covered by Mazda’s five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, which also includes five years of roadside assistance. It’s a solid offering, although longer warranty terms are becoming increasingly common in this segment.

Servicing is reasonably priced at around $440 per service over seven years, and the intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. That should make ongoing ownership relatively straightforward for families.