Toyota HiLux vs Volvo C40

What's the difference?

Given the HiLux BEV was developed in close cooperation with mining companies, its relatively short driving range appears tailor-made for that role given the daily driving distances (typically around 150km or less) in underground and open-cut mining operations. However, determining if our SR5 test vehicle is equally well suited to urban tradie duties would require careful analysis of driving range and payload/towing requirements, to determine if its emissions-free high purchase price can be justified.

The C40 becomes a compelling option in the electrified small SUV space, offering a premium look and feel, great range and tech inclusions at the price, as well as awesome on-road dynamics.

Its main downsides are the rear seat, which is compromised by its platform and design-led roofline, and the overwhelming power and added traction of the dual-motor makes the single motor less attractive on the value front.

Still, regardless of variant chosen, the C40 looks to offer a stand-out balance of price, range, and performance, against its traditional rivals and newcomers alike.

Externally the only visual differences between a HiLux BEV and its diesel SR5 equivalent are the BEV's solid front grille, a Type 2/CCS charging port for the propulsion battery located behind a hinged body flap on the front passenger side and aerodynamically-tuned 17-inch alloy wheels designed to minimise drag and optimise driving range. It also has unique rear suspension (see Motor).

The BEV variant has benefitted from the latest HiLux generation's exterior and interior styling updates in keeping this iconic workhorse looking fresh, particularly up front with its high slimline headlights, imposing body-coloured grille and trapezoidal side air intakes.

This more hard-edged look is also evident in the BEV's interior which although embracing new dash and centre console designs fortunately adheres to the time-proven practicality and user-friendliness of traditional 'piano key' buttons for its climate control plus a large dial for off-road drive settings (see Motor).

Volvo has become a brand with a distinctive and consistent design language which embodies the kind of beautiful minimalism normally associated with Scandinavian brands.

I have always liked how Volvo says more with less design elements, with only gentle touches of chrome or gloss black, and a lack of over-the-top sporty pieces avoiding the temptation to over-sell the sporty potential of the brand’s range.

The C40 takes the small SUV formula, well established by its XC40 relation, and gets a bit weird and experimental. It’s slightly lower and has a more coupe-styled rear, with a strongly raked rear window giving it a sportier and more aggressive look than the rest of Volvo’s SUV range.

The styling is sold by an angular spoiler piece running atop the boot, and the rear light clusters have gone all minimalist, constructed of individual pieces rather than a single transparent housing, and they give a nod to the C30 hatchback which this car is the spiritual successor to, by name and nature.

The interior offers up no surprises, sticking to the formula Volvo has established across all of its current models. An effortlessly premium space with, again, a minimalistic dash dominated by the portrait touchscreen, the C40’s premium nature is confirmed by its finely patterned inlays, simple chrome pieces, and abundance of soft-touch surfaces.

The big upright vent fittings with clever rhomboid patterns on their adjustment dials are always a highlight piece of modern Volvos, and the pattern work is continued on the central volume adjust dial and even on the little rotating pieces of the light and wiper stalks. Clever.

Even the software is paired back on the multimedia suite and digital dashboard, with easy to use shortcuts and simple menus which suit the car.

Volvo might turn off some buyers with the more unconventional shape of the C40. But for those looking for a more traditional SUV it also offers the XC40 in the same two variants, and the Polestar 2 caters to those not looking for an SUV at all.

Our test vehicle’s 2455kg kerb weight is 300kg more than its diesel sibling, which combined with its 3170kg GVM leaves a 715kg payload rating that’s 250kg lower.

The HiLux BEV is also rated to tow up to 2000kg of braked trailer (1500kg less than the diesel) and its 4670kg GCM rating (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) would leave just 215kg of payload capacity if towing its maximum trailer weight. This could easily be used up by two big tradies before you could add their tools, so it’s important to be aware of these load ratings if planning to tow.

tub, is equipped with anchorage points front and rear plus hydraulic tailgate dampers to assist opening and closing. Load tub access is made easier and safer by concave side-steps behind the rear wheels.

Like its diesel sibling, rear seating for tall people offers minimal knee/shoulder/head room, combined with a notably short distance between the top of the base cushion and floor creating a steep thigh angle that concentrates body weight on your lower back.

Driver and front passenger storage includes a bin and bottle holder in each door, cupholders on either side of the dash and upper and lower glove boxes. The centre console has wireless phone charging up front, two more cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back containing the V2L (Vehicle to Load) AC inverter with domestic three-pin plug and a 12V accessory socket.

Rear passengers get a bottle holder and bin in each door plus pockets on both front seat backrests, a fold-down centre armrest with two more cupholders plus two USB-C charging ports and adjustable air vents on the rear fascia of the centre console.

There’s no under-seat storage available and the vehicle’s portable AC charging cable, which is stored in a zip-up bag, has no dedicated storage area so must be carried on either the cabin floor or in the load tub.

The C40 is essentially a XC40 with a cropped down roofline, and there are some obvious downsides which this new shape brings.

The front seat throws no surprises, though, offering plenty of room for two adults with a welcome level of adjustability for the seat and wheel. The seats could be more comfortable, though, with a notable lack of padding in the base compared to some luxury (or even non-luxury) rivals. 

I’m a fan of the fabric trim which comes on both grades, bucking the trend of needing to have leather or leather-like trim for a car to feel ‘premium’.

The ample window space up front, including the massive glass roof helps the C40’s cabin feel spacious, but the view out the rear with its aggressive design is all but a very limited letterbox aspect, particularly if the rear seat headrests are in the upright position. 

While some controls are exclusively via touch interface, there is a physical volume dial, and shortcut buttons for the defogger functions. 

Temperature is controlled by touch, however, and the detail settings have some smaller toggle adjustments. Tricky to jab at when you’re on the move.

The digital dash is refreshingly simple, but minimally adjustable, with the choice of either a nifty navigation screen, a blank screen, or trip details being the only options.

Cabin storage is good but not stellar. There are bottle holders and big pockets in the doors, a set of two cupholders in the centre (beats the Polestar 2’s single cupholder), a small tray with a wireless charger under the multimedia screen, and a smallish console armrest box.

The rear seat is where the real problem exists. Unlike the XC40, the C40’s cropped roofline means my head was hard up against the roof (I’m 182cm tall). 

I did have decent knee room behind my own seating position, however the seat comfort in the back still isn’t as good as some rivals. 

The middle position is also compromised, thanks to the raised centre floor piece the C40’s platform needs to facilitate all-wheel drive in its combustion relations.

A bottle holder appears in each door pocket, and in a rare inclusion, there are heated outboard rear seats, adjustable air vents, and USB-C charging ports.

The boot has a quoted capacity of 413 litres with the rear seats up. The floor is comparatively high suggesting a smallish space when loaded with luggage cases, for instance. Stay tuned for a follow-up review so we can see how well it holds our three-piece demo set.

The floor itself has an adjustable, pop-up divider and multiple luggage hooks, making it quite versatile, and there is a cavity beneath which can hold your charging cables as well as the inflator kit in place of a spare wheel.

When it comes to electric vehicles, it’s impossible to consider price alone, as you also have to consider driving range, and the C40 manages to impress on both fronts.

Its refreshingly simplified range consists of just two highly-specified variants, a single motor which starts from $74,990, offering a 434km driving range, or a dual motor starting from $82,490 which offers a 420km driving range.

There’s much more devil in the detail, but to set the scene there are now quite a few direct rivals in this price-bracket, including everything from the Tesla Model Y (from $72,300), Mercedes-Benz EQA (from $78,513), Polestar 2 (from $63,900) and even the Kia Niro which is similarly sized and specified (from $65,300).

Interestingly, the C40 is closely related to the Polestar 2, but has a much higher base starting price. Volvo says this is because it carries a higher standard specification, and offers the C40 without option packs.

Standard gear on the base single motor C40 includes 19-inch alloy wheels, a 9.0-inch portrait multimedia touchscreen (running a Google-based always-online software suite), LED headlights, dual-zone climate control, a fixed panoramic sunroof, electrically adjustable front seats, heated seats for the front two and outboard rear seats, a powered tailgate, as well as keyless entry with touch-free ignition.

Interestingly, Volvo also told us some 90 per cent of customer interest so far has been for the more expensive dual-motor variant, which is particularly impressive for doubling the power output while adding 20-inch alloy wheels, a 360-degree parking suite, premium Harmon Kardon audio, and an alternate interior trim.

Both variants score safety equipment and items which are otherwise part of expensive option packs in the Polestar 2 range. We’ll take a look at the full safety gear later in this review.

Overall, the C40 impresses on the premium car value front compared to rivals, bolstered by solid range and impressive performance.

The HiLux BEV is equipped with two electric motors delivering full-time four-wheel drive. The front motor drives the front wheels and produces 82.2kW of power and 205.5Nm of torque. The more powerful rear motor driving the rear wheels produces 129.3kW and 268.6Nm.

Combined maximum power output is officially rated at 144kW but there’s no official combined torque figure given that the electric motors produce their peak torque at different times.

These motors drive the wheels through chassis-mounted transaxles equipped with single-speed transmissions. They are synchronised electronically using ‘fly-by-wire’ accelerator and gear/mode selection.

The centre console-mounted shifter controls conventional drive selections (Park, Drive, Reverse) plus offers a ‘B’ setting for optimum regenerative braking, to minimise brake pedal use and maximise battery charging.

Its full-time 4x4 system automatically distributes torque on demand between the front and rear wheels according to traction sensors. The driver can choose between three drive modes (Normal, Sport and Eco) and has access to a multi-terrain system (MTS) which optimises traction in different terrain across six settings including Auto, Dirt, Sand, Mud, Mogul and Snow.

The strengthened chassis frame provides protection for the propulsion battery mounted between the main rails. Toyota claims the battery subframe has been designed for flexibility to tolerate high levels of torsional twist when off-roading. It features a full undercover to protect high voltage parts from water splash or other damage and shares the same 700mm wading depth as the diesel version.

HiLux BEV also features a unique De Dion-type (rigid hollow beam axle) leaf spring rear suspension, with the transaxle mounted on the chassis frame to reduce unsprung weight and the beam axle with traditional leaf springs allowing efficient load carrying and off-road performance.

Great news here, the C40 can be chosen with two powerful layouts, either a front-wheel drive 170kW/330Nm set-up, or a dual-motor all-wheel drive arrangement, able to make use of nearly double the power at 300kW/660Nm. The dual-motor is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 4.7 seconds.

The front-drive is backed by a 69kWh battery allowing it a 434km range, while the dual motor ups the battery size to 78kWh to allow a 420km driving range.

The HiLux BEV has an official driving range of up to 315km based on the optimistic NEDC combined cycle test procedure.

When we collected our test vehicle the propulsion battery charge was at 100 per cent but the displayed estimated driving range was 272km.

We initially drove 84km unladen in metro traffic (using only Normal/Eco drive modes and max regen braking) with average combined energy consumption of 28.3kWh/100km, which was way above the sub-20kWh/100km figure needed to crack the claimed 300km-plus of driving range.

After recharging to 100 per cent for our GVM test, the estimated driving range dropped to 266km. On this second charge we drove another 173km, of which more than 100km was hauling a full payload which saw a spike in energy consumption to 31kWh/100km. We finished our test with 19 per cent charge and 50km of driving range remaining.

Our total test distance was 258km during which we achieved average energy consumption of 27.8kWh/100km. Therefore, based on our consumption figure, you could expect a driving range in real-world urban use of around 200-220km.

Toyota claims a 10-80 per cent charge time of approximately 30 minutes using a (150kW) DC fast charger or 10-100 per cent in about 6.5 hours using (10kW) AC charging.

Surprisingly, energy consumption is quite high for both C40 variants. The single motor is the more efficient of the two, consuming 16.8kWh/100km on the more lenient ADR testing schedule, while the dual motor officially consumes 22.2kWh/100km to the same standard. I saw around 23kWh/100km overall in my short test of the dual-motor variant.

Energy consumption could be better for both, as I have achieved more consistently impressive results particularly from Hyundai and Kia electric cars.

Where the C40 is more impressive though is its charging specs, which are exactly where they need to be for a car this size. On a rapid DC charger, the C40 can charge at a rate of 150kW meaning a 10 - 80 percent charge in 40 minutes for the dual motor, or 32 minutes for the single motor.

On the slower AC standard, the C40 charges at a rate of 11kW. Expect a 10 - 80 percent charge time of around five or six hours on this standard. 

The C40 uses a European-standard Type 2 CCS charging port, although it misses out on the handy two-way charging feature offered by some rivals.

It also rides and handles much like its diesel stablemate. The most noticeable differences are the smooth yet energetic power delivery and the near silence of its drivetrain, with most cabin noise coming from the tyres which is also far from intrusive.

Near instant torque from its dual electric motors provides lively response for a vehicle of this size and weight. While it doesn’t nail your eyeballs to the back of your head like some EVs, it does provide spirited acceleration from standing starts and takes less than 10 seconds to reach triple-digit speeds.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 650kg into the load tub which with driver was lineball with its peak payload rating. The leaf-spring rear suspension only compressed about 40mm under this weight leaving ample bump-stop clearance that ensured no bottoming-out on our test route.

In true HiLux tradition, the ride quality noticeably improved and the chassis and drivetrain were more than capable of hauling this payload on a variety of roads. Overall, it’s a competent load hauler like its diesel stablemate, albeit always with an eye on the battery charge given its limited range.

If you’ve driven any kind of XC40 or even a Polestar 2 before, the C40 will offer no surprises. It’s pretty much exactly the same from behind the wheel with a few subtle tweaks.

This is a very good thing. The C40 is quiet, easy to drive, and its electric motor and regen system offer a smooth single-pedal experience.

It is also alarmingly, overwhelmingly, rapid. While its massive set of batteries under the floor make it feel heavy off the line in stop-start traffic, sticking your boot into the accelerator will remove any doubt, particularly in the dual-motor variant, that this Volvo means business.

The dual-motor also has an incredible torque-vectoring system, making it extremely difficult to elicit so much as a squeak from its tyres. It also feels as though torque is distributed quite evenly between its two driven axles, making it feel neither prone to over- or understeer.

This has the effect of making the C40 feel somewhat indestructible in the corners, with absurd levels of grip. 

The same feeling is present in top-spec versions of the Polestar 2, only the feeling of ever-present weight is more noticeable in the higher-riding C40, which can make it unsettling to take corners at the kinds of speeds it is capable of.

The steering tune is interesting. Volvo offers two software-controlled modes, either heavy or standard, and the standard mode is heavy enough. 

Despite its electrical assistance, the wheel does continue to offer some organic feedback, making the C40 a pleasure to steer on countryside roads.

The ride is also surprisingly good, despite massive wheel options. I was impressed how easily the C40 handled most bumps and undulations, communicating little to the cabin. 

The ride can approach its limits with such big wheels and the weight of its batteries, generally these are communicated via unsettling thuds from underneath the car. Regular undulations at higher speeds also had the C40 bouncing around a little.

On the whole, though, the cabin is kept relatively insulated and serene, adding an element of total confidence, similar to that offered by Teslas, whilst offering better ride quality with a softer edge. At higher speed, at least on the 20-inch wheels, road noise does pick up, however.

In terms of electric driving, there is a single adjustable setting for regen. The car either offers a full single pedal mode with maximum regenerative braking to bring the car to a halt with the motor alone, or a ‘standard’ mode which tones the regen down and offers it blended in via the brake pedal. 

Single pedal mode is more efficient. I suggest you stick to it if you want to make the most of this car’s efficiency.

I was surprised to have so few complaints about the C40’s drive experience. This is a balanced and capable EV which is yet another example of how even vehicles which use combustion platforms are improved out of sight by full electrification.

Sticking to its brand promise, Volvo offers the full range of active safety equipment on the C40 regardless of variant.

This includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, rear auto braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, and one of the best adaptive cruise control systems on the market.

The only item the single motor misses out on is a 360-degree parking camera, which is exclusive to the dual motor variant.

It is notable how the adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring rear cross-traffic alert, and rear auto braking are on the options list for the Polestar 2.

These active systems combined with eight airbags (the standard dual front, side, and curtain, as well as a driver’s knee and centre airbag) make for a five-star ANCAP safety rating to the latest 2022 standards.

The HiLux BEV comes standard with a five-year/unlimited km warranty and separate five-year warranty covering the propulsion battery which can be extended for up to five years (so 10 years in total) with an annual battery health check. The propulsion battery is also covered by an eight-year/160,000km capacity warranty if its energy storage falls below 70 per cent of the original capacity.

Scheduled servicing is every six months/10,000km with capped pricing of $220 per scheduled service for the first five years (or 10 services in total).

The company has a vast network of more than 275 dealerships across Australia including all states and territories and many regional areas.

The C40 is covered by Volvo’s five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with a separate eight-year, 160,000km warranty for the battery. There is also eight years of roadside assistance attached.

It is pleasing to see the service intervals for the C40 are long, as they should be for an electric car with so few moving parts, set at two years or 30,000km. 

The first 24 month service is free of charge, and Volvo tells us service pricing after this period will average out to around $100 a year ($200 per visit).