Suzuki Vitara vs Lexus RC F

What's the difference?

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

There’s so much to like about the Lexus RC F EP3. A glorious atmo V8 soundtrack, sharp dynamics, plus loads of standard features and safety tech in a beautifully engineered four-seat coupe package. It can’t match the turbos for mid-range thump, and if you need practicality look elsewhere, but it’s the type of performance car we’ll be looking back at in years to come as one of the last to proudly hold its head above a rising tide of turbos, hybrids, and electric hot rods. 

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

At just over 4.7m long, a bit more than 2.0m wide and less than 1.4m high, the RC F has a classically macho wide coupe stance with a distinctive Lexus twist. 

In a late 2019 refresh the RC F was upgraded with suitably jagged single-piece, LED headlights and an even wider version of Lexus’ signature ‘spindle grille’ featuring a new mesh pattern.

Pumped up guards sitting over the standard 19-inch BBS rims feature gills behind them to help smooth airflow around the front of the car, stabilise it overall, and exhaust cooling air flowing around the brakes.

A revised rear diffuser is now body coloured, the stacked-at-an-angle quad exhaust pipes are a Lexus ‘F’ hallmark, stainless steel window trims are now dark rather than bright thanks to a thicker oxide film covering, and the LED tail-lights feature a new L-shaped insert.

Of course, a car’s looks are always subjective, but I think the RC F’s interior is super cool, combining long, flowing graphics on the seats and doors, with rounded, multi-level sections and brushed metal finishes across the dashboard.

The racy instrument binnacle tips its hat to classic sports cars of the ‘60s, the analogue clock between the central air vents could come off as cheesy, but actually looks great, and the large multimedia screen set ‘rear-of-stage’ at the top of the dash is subtly integrated.

True to form, this Lexus is beautifully finished with an obvious eye to design detail and manufacturing quality. Which makes its biggest failing all the more irritating. 

The ‘Remote Touch’ control pad behind the gearshift in the centre console managing settings in the media system is hateful.

Operating in similar fashion to a laptop mousepad (only worse) despite available adjustments for speed/sensitivity, even on its most benign setting it is maddeningly over-reactive and inaccurate. Lexus should just put its hand up, say “My bad” and retire it, yesterday.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

Practicality is unlikely to be high on the priority list for anyone shopping for a car like this, but comfort and convenience certainly will be.

And the RC F delivers just that for its front seat passengers, providing lots of space, as well as numerous storage options, including long door bins with room for smaller bottles, two cupholders in the centre console, a large, lidded storage box/armrest between the seats (housing twin USB-A ports, an aux-in jack, and a 12V socket), as well as a decent glove box.

But that space we were just talking about pretty much evaporates when you move to the back. This is a classic ‘2+2.’ The electric folding and sliding front seats make access okay, however, sitting behind the driver’s seat, set for my 183cm height, headroom is tragic, legroom is tight, and toe room is bad. 

So, let’s assume it’s a kids-only area, and once ensconced back there, they’ll appreciate a fold down centre armrest, two cupholders between the seats (with a roll-top cover), and adjustable air vents. But there isn’t a USB point in sight which may lead to friction when devices lose charge, or a plug-in negotiation with front-seaters. 

Lexus claims a modest boot volume of 366 litres (VDA) and it’s important to note that although there’s a ‘ski-port’ door to accommodate lengthy things (like skis?) the rear seats don't fold down. So, flexibility is limited, although there are tie-down hooks at each corner of the floor to help secure tricky loads.

The Lexus RC F is a no-tow zone, and don’t bother looking for a spare of any description, a repair/inflator kit is your only immediate option. Good thing roadside assistance is included in the warranty package.

Base price for the Lexus RC F is $134,129, before on road costs, which puts it in the same ballpark as the BMW M2 CS ($147,400), undercuts the Audi RS5 Coupe ($157,700), and prices it above Merc-AMG’s C 43 Coupe ($116,500).

The ‘Enhancement Pack 3’ (EP3) option bundle fitted to our test car (19-inch BBS alloys, Brembo carbon-ceramic brakes, titanium exhaust, carbon fibre cabin trim, and glass sunroof), adds $29,161, for an as-tested total of $163,290, which stars to push it into even tougher territory (think M4 CS and C 63 S).

But aside from the EP3 extras, the RC F is well furnished when it comes to standard features, with highlights including, semi-aniline leather accented trim, electrically adjusted (10-way with memory), heated and ventilated front seats, keyless entry and start, dual-zone climate control, plus a 10.3-inch centre screen (managed via the ‘Remote Touch’ interface and voice recognition) running satellite navigation (with live traffic updates) and a 17-speaker Mark Levinson audio system (including digital radio and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto functionality).

Other boxes ticked include, auto-fold exterior mirrors (with auto-dimming, heating and memory), auto LED headlights (with active high beam), LED DRLs, indicators, and tail-lights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera, an 8.0-inch multi-function digital driver display, leather-trimmed gearshift and (electric height and reach adjustable) steering wheel, ‘Drive Mode Select’ (Eco, Normal, Sport S, Sport S+, and Custom modes), ‘Adaptive Variable Suspension’ (Normal and Sport S modes), and ‘Vehicle Dynamic Integrated Management’ (Sport S+ and Expert modes).

Along with the standard safety tech (detailed in the Safety section below) that’s a pretty handy basket of fruit that stands up well relative to the asking price and competition.

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

The Lexus RC F is powered by the latest iteration of the brand’s (2UR-GSE) 5.0-litre, naturally aspirated V8 engine.

Featuring exotic touches such as a dual variable valve timing (with electric actuation on the inlet side), dual-length intake runners, forged connecting rods, titanium valves, and the ‘D-4S’ control system (combining port and direct-fuel injection) it produces 351kW (471hp) at 7100rpm, and 530Nm from 4800-5600rpm.

Drive goes to the rear wheels via an eight-speed (torque converter) automatic transmission with a new ‘AI-Shift’ control designed to adapt to the driver’s style and shift drive modes more effectively, as well as a Torsen mechanical limited-slip differential.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

Claimed fuel economy for the combined (ADR 81/02 - urban, extra-urban) cycle is 11.1L/100km, the V8 emitting 254g/km of CO2 in the process.

In our week with the car, over a combination of city, suburban and freeway conditions (including some enthusiastic B-road running) we recorded an average of 12.8L/100km, which, while not exactly frugal, is still impressive for a V8, performance-focused coupe. 

Minimum fuel requirement is 98 RON premium unleaded, and you’ll need 66 litres of it to fill the tank.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

A performance car should excite the senses, but the RC-F leans on one a little harder than the rest… hearing.

With the addition of launch control in last year’s update the big V8 will reliably slingshot you from 0-100km/h in just 4.5sec, which is no mucking around quick. But it’s the combination of raucous induction noise, furious mechanical roar, and bellowing titanium exhaust that add extra drama to the experience.

Fact is though, while maximum torque of 530Nm is not to be sneezed at, that number is only available from 4800-5600rpm. Although the RCF starts to get into its stride at about 3000rpm, the twin-turbo BMW M2 CS smashes it for mid-range punch with its 550Nm on tap from just 2350rpm.

So, in everyday, even mildly enthusiastic driving, the RC F sounds amazing, and don’t get me wrong, this is a proper performance car, but it doesn’t have the low-down, kick-in-the-pants grunt of its turbocharged six and eight cylinder competitors.

Linear power delivery, and the crisp throttle response only a naturally aspirated engine can deliver go some way to evening things up, however, and there are multiple systems to help tune the drive experience to your exact preference.

‘Drive Mode Select’ offers five settings (Eco, Normal, Sport S, Sport S+, and Custom).

Eco lowers engine output, dampens the throttle, and dulls the air-con in the name of fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. But you’re not buying this car to save the planet, so don’t touch that button, Sport S is the sweet spot (and save Sport S+ for track days).

Quick gearshifts from the eight-speed auto (particularly using the wheel-mounted paddles), that rapid throttle response, and nice steering feel work seamlessly together to deliver a satisfying backroad experience. Sport S holds gears longer on the way up the ratios, and is quicker to shift on the way back down.

In a more civilised mode, with eight gears to play with, freeway cruising is relaxed, especially given the top two ratios are overdriven.

The ‘Adaptive Variable Suspension’ offers Normal and Sport S modes, and here normal is the go. The basic set-up is double wishbone front, multi-link rear, and Lexus says the SACHS-developed AVS shocks can adjust damping force across a range of 30 levels. But even in the default Normal setting the ride is firm.

According to Lexus, the standard Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tyres (255/35 fr / 275/35 rr) have been tailored specifically to the RC F and they grip hard, keeping the 1715kg coupe planted in quick corners. But their narrow profile no doubt contributes to the car’s less than limo-like feel around town.

Then the ‘Vehicle Dynamic Integrated Management’ system fine tunes the car’s stability control in Sport S+ and Expert modes. Expert only happens when you’re in Sport S+ and turn the stability control off. So again, best to go full racer at the circuit, and we didn’t explore VDIM this time around.

The electrically-assisted steering is not only accurate (the strength of the steering rack bushing has been increased by 150 per cent to boost response), but the wheel itself feels great, and the huge (380mm) Brembo carbon ceramic brakes are mega (working well from cold unlike some other carbon set-ups).  

Under the heading of notable mentions, the digital instrument cluster is inspired by the V10-powered Lexus LFA supercar, switching between a blue economy indicator ring in Eco mode, a standard tachometer and digital speedometer in Normal, a white and red cluster in Sport S, and orange in SPORT S+ (with three-stage upshift indicator lights).

Plus, you can also switch between racy functions such as a lap timer and G-force display, and soft-trim knee pads on the sides of the front centre console improve comfort and seating stability if you’re having a crack.

The Lexus RC hasn’t been assessed by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, but it boasts a solid array of active and passive safety tech.

To help avoid a crash the expected systems like ABS, EBD, brake assist, as well as stability and traction controls are all on-board.

And despite its relatively advanced age (the RC was launched globally in 2014) the RC F hasn’t been left behind, with more recent safety developments also included.

Specifically, pre-collision warning (including AEB, with pedestrian detection), active cruise control, lane-departure warning (with steering assist), vehicle sway warning, auto high beam, blind-spot monitoring, a reversing camera, front and rear parking sensors, and rear cross-traffic alert.

But if an impact is unavoidable, you’re protected by eight airbags (driver and front passenger front and side , driver and front passenger knee, and side curtain bags).

Pedestrians aren’t forgotten either, the RC F featuring sensors able to detect if the front bumper has collided with a person, immediately lifting the back of the bonnet up by around 65mm, to help absorb impact force. Interestingly, the ‘Pop-up Hood’ sensors won’t deploy this function if the car collides with anything else.

There are top tether points and ISOFIX anchors to securely fit baby capsules/child restraints in both rear seat positions.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.

The standard Lexus warranty in Australia is four years/100,000km, which outscores the likes of Audi and BMW on duration (both at three years) but trails on kilometres (both offering unlimited km).

Then there’s Merc, which has gazumped all the luxury players with five year/unlimited km cover. Plus, there’s the fact that the mainstream market standard is now five years/unlimited km, with some at seven years.

To balance the scales, the ‘Lexus Encore Privileges’ program provides 24-hour roadside assistance for the duration of the warranty, as well as access to owner events and special offers.

Service is scheduled for 12 months/15,000km (whichever comes first), and Encore capped price servicing is available for a three year period, averaging $595 annually, for an all-in cost of $1785.

A Lexus loan car is provided while your pride and joy is in the workshop, or a pick-up and return option (from home or office) is available in some instances. You’ll also receive a complimentary wash and interior vacuum. Nice.