MG HS vs Suzuki S-Cross

What's the difference?

MG is quietly establishing itself as a champion of the electric space, with this HS mid-sizer offering a compelling list of specs with a long electric range in an attractive package.

It is still lacking in a few obvious areas, from driving dynamics to charging speed, but it’s doing its part at the asking price to at least make a plug-in hybrid alternative worth considering.

There’s no way around it. The S-Cross might have a smart new face and a higher level of safety equipment compared to before, but it still looks like a crossover from the previous decade, lacking some features that fresher machinery now include for the money.

Speaking of which, Suzuki’s decision to import the AWD only versions from Europe further undermines the series, since its circa-$45,000 driveaway price tag puts the old stager in the company of some very impressive newer rivals.

However, with sound packaging, a user-friendly interior, strong turbo performance and composed dynamics, there’s still much to recommend if you’re a small SUV buyer unconcerned about driving the latest thing.

That said, there are more modern and compelling alternatives out there.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

MG’s success is not just in being one of the most affordable but making affordability so damn good looking.

Taking cues from Mazda’s successful glitzy design formula, the HS impresses with a chrome-embossed grille, chiselled light clusters, combining with a curvaceous bonnet for an eye-catching face.

Down the side the curvy lines continue, undulating over the wheelarches, to a well resolved rear-end, complete with tidy light clusters and even dual-exhaust pipes.

Look at this car a little too long, though, and you start to find more than a few flaws with its design.

Sure, it’s eye catching, but the 17-inch alloys do a pretty ordinary job of filling those big wheelarches, and there’s something a little off about the ride height.

You can also see the rear suspension control arms sitting well below the base of the rear, a reminder the HS is an SUV based on the MG6 sedan.

Suffice it to say, while it looks great at a few paces, up close it misses out on some of the nuance and poise of its rivals.

Inside follows the same formula of the outside, with attractive curvy lines, a sporty-looking steering wheel and a pair of dazzling screens.

Again, though, look closer and you’ll see this otherwise modern-looking interior is not as impressive beneath the surface.

The seats look plush but feel cheap with vinyl trim, and the same goes for the door cards and centre console. All have soft-touch surfaces which, in reality, are paper thin. It still beats having hard plastic in the doors, though, so context is everything.

The plastic trims throughout are also hit-and-miss, with some looking great, and others hard and nasty.

The +EV versions of the HS ditch the mechanical shifter in the centre console for an electronic one, which combines nicely with the digital dash to make the cabin feel more modern than even some more upmarket rivals.

It’s been reported that Suzuki in Italy was responsible for the restyle. One of its aims was to more-emphatically position the latest S-Cross above the (slightly) smaller Vitara.

The Italian connection is not new to the series, as the preceding SX4 (you’ll still find that badge on the tailgate) was the deft work of renowned design firm Italdesign. It was an early small SUV pioneer back in 2006.

What’s immediately obvious is that the MY23 S-Cross version looks heaps better up front than its angry-faced immediate predecessor. Banishing the fussy toothy grille for a layered multi-LED headlight design and modish chrome-bar grille insert gives the Hungarian-made crossover a bolder and far more contemporary appearance.

What’s more surprising for a facelift is the reshaping of the C-pillar immediately behind the rear doors, swapping out the old triangular back light for a narrower rectangular unit. Along with the harder-edged tailgate, blocker bumpers and raised horizontal tail-light treatments, they reveal the sheer extent of design change that’s occurred. The Suzuki has now at last lost its original Nissan Dualis/Qashqai-esque profile.

However, despite the aid of much larger and now-squared-off wheel arch cladding and repositioned plastic strips along the sides, the carryover doors and roofline do betray the S-Cross’ 2013 vintage in profile.

Will buyers care? The Suzuki still looks good anyway.

There are some particularly strange things about the HS’s cabin when it comes to practicality.

The seats are perhaps the biggest issue. Not only are they clad in a cheap feeling vinyl, but the seating position is very high, and you hardly sink into the seat base, leaving you with the impression you’re sitting on the car rather than in it. Weird.

Visibility is great out the sides of this car, but with the seating position the way it is, I feel like my head is close to the roof and the windscreen has a narrow letterbox aspect. This is complicated further by the rear vision mirror, which sticks a fair way down into your field of view.

The front of the cabin feels plenty wide enough, though, and there are some other practicality wins, like the multimedia screen which is easily within reach.

Its limited resolution is a benefit here, with the touch elements being big and easy to reach while you’re concentrating on the road, but the stock software is clumsily laid out and slow, taking a full second or two to react to some interactions.

This is especially notable as the entire climate system is operated via the touchscreen.

The cabin offers up decent storage. There are big bottle holders in the doors as part of a larger bin, and there are a further two large bottle holders in the centre console with a removable divider.

The armrest box opens to reveal a small storage area, which also has an internal vent for the air-conditioning.

Under the shortcut buttons up front there’s a flip-open tray with two USB outlets and a 12V port, but this little opening is so tiny it’s no good to store any kind of object. It’s also impossible to close the flip cover if you have something plugged in.

The rear seat is one of the HS’s best attributes. Compared to even the front seats, the rear passenger space is enormous, with ample width, headroom, and legroom.

The seats can recline slightly, and amenities are even impressive with two pockets on the backs of the front seats, large bottle holders in the doors, dual adjustable air vents, and two USB ports for rear passengers.

Of special note is the strangely lavish drop-down centre armrest, which is clad in soft trim and has a flip-open tray and dual bottle holders.

Rear seat space comes at a bit of a cost to boot capacity, though. The HS offers 451 litres, which is a little off-the-pace for the mid-size SUV segment. The rear seats intrude into the space a fair bit, and the floor is quite high.

It fit our three-piece CarsGuide luggage set, but only just, and it required removing the retractable luggage cover. Unlike the top-spec Essence, the Excite does not have a power tailgate.

No spare wheel in +EV versions of the HS, with the underfloor space housing a repair kit and a small cutaway for charging paraphernalia.

Besides the inherent reliability of buying Suzuki, one of the previous S-Cross’s biggest advantages was its spacious and practical interior.

Of course, dimensionally almost everything carries over, so it remains easy to get in thanks to big doors that open wide. There’s ample space front and rear, with sufficient headroom, legroom and shoulder width for an SUV in this class front and back, while good all-round vision is afforded by a commanding driving position and plenty of glass.

Objectively, the S-Cross’ cabin is difficult to fault.

The front seats are broad but seem supportive enough. Most people should find the right driving position ahead of the (carryover) steering wheel, that adjusts for reach as well as height.

The instrument dials are clear and simple to decipher, aided by the addition of an auxiliary digital speedo (at last). There’s no missing the camera within the newly-elevated centre touchscreen. It’s an easy stretch to the climate control buttons and there are several places to store things in or on, especially in the large-ish glove box.

Front and rear centre armrests are also fitted, with the rears containing cupholders. Additionally, while there is lots of hardwearing plastic, it seems of decent quality and is well glued together.  

Nobody will be intimidated by the unfamiliar in this Suzuki. Timid and perhaps even older drivers in particular ought to feel at home.

However, repositioned centre console and updated multimedia screen apart, it’s much the same as when the first S-Cross surfaced in 2013, and that might be an issue for potential buyers seeking to buy a $45,000 to $50,000 SUV.

More annoyingly, the front passenger seat lacks a cushion height adjuster; there is no physical volume knob for the multimedia system, so users must tap or jab a screen or disturb the driver by using the steering wheel switch instead; the rear seat has no passenger-facing air vents; and the 7.0-inch touchscreen is laughably tiny in 2022.

Plus, the Prestige’s missing equipment as found in some similarly-priced up-spec rivals might put people off; no head-up display, heated seats, wireless charger or configurable instrumentation are just a few of them. It all feels old and not premium enough – something a quick visit to a Kia, Hyundai or Nissan dealer will immediately reveal.

Never mind. At least the rear backrest reclines (a tiny bit) for added comfort, while further back, boot capacity remains the same at 430 litres. The backrest has a 60:40 split and the floor can be positioned in different locations. With the seats folded down, capacity rises to 665L, while maximum volume is 1230L. The load area is flat and wide and a space saver spare wheel is located beneath the boot floor.

Overall, then, the S-Cross is a pleasant and accommodating package, but one that will seem dated compared to newer rivals.

Not from $40,990 (all prices stated are before on-road costs) sadly, or $3500 more for the $44,490 Prestige flagship that sits as the largest and most expensive model in the brand’s entire line-up.

This represents a hike of $10,500 and $12,500 respectively.

Suzuki says this pricing is in line with equivalently-equipped rivals like the extremely popular Kia Seltos and new Nissan Qashqai, especially given that a turbo petrol engine with all-wheel drive (AWD, dubbed AllGrip in marketing-speak) is currently the only specification you can buy.

That is true. The previous S-Cross, facelifted in 2016, was front-wheel-drive only (though earlier grades did offer AWD), so the MY23 AWD version should absorb at least $2500 of that price inflation.

The previous model also lacked some now-critical safety technologies that have now at last made it on the Suzuki, including autonomous emergency braking (AEB), Lane Departure Warning, Blind Spot Monitoring, Rear Cross-traffic Alert and something called Weaving Alert that sounds like a driver-drowsiness warning prompt.

Additionally, the newcomer adopts adaptive cruise control with full stop/go functionality, high beam assist and auto-on/off headlights for the first time, as well as a redesigned upper-centre console housing a updated multimedia system with wireless Apple CarPlay in either 7.0-inch or 9.0-inch (for Prestige) sizes.

These build on top of the old model’s seven airbags, electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake-assist, cruise control, front fog lights, keyless entry/start, 7.0-inch touchscreen, reverse camera, satellite navigation, wired Apple CarPlay/Android Auto compatibility, Bluetooth audio and telephony connectivity, dual-zone climate control, electric folding mirrors, rear privacy glass and 17-inch alloy wheels.

Shelling out another $3500 for the Prestige grade now scores you that nine-inch touchscreen, 360-degree view camera, leather trimmed seating, polished alloys and the debut of a panoramic sunroof.

However, nowadays, with the S-Cross Prestige especially nudging $50K-driveaway, it’s still missing goodies like the full electronic instrumentation, twin-screen displays, a head-up display, wireless charging, premium multi-speaker audio, a powered driver’s seat with memory, heated/vented front seats and an electric tailgate that the MY23 Seltos GT-Line gains, for similar money.

Most of these items are also available in the Qashqai and Mazda CX-30 at this price point.

There is also no escaping the fact that the S-Cross is looking old and dated inside already, while the Seltos and new Qashqai especially are crisp, modern designs throughout. 

But don’t fret, Suzuki fans. We understand that cheaper S-Cross 2WD grades are in the pipeline, perhaps for next year.

Let’s wait and see.

This is where plug-in hybrids tend to get a bit complicated, so bear with us.

The MG HS +EV pairs a 1.5-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine with an electric motor on the front axle. The two drive the front wheels via a new 10-speed traditional torque converter automatic transmission, instead of the dual-clutch which features in the combustion-only versions of this car.

The engine produces 119kW/250Nm on its own, while the electric motor produces 90kW/230Nm. The two combined produce 189kW/370Nm, making the +EV by far the most powerful HS on the market, capable of accelerating from 0-100km/h in 6.9 seconds.

The 2023 S-Cross uses Suzuki’s well-received Boosterjet engine tech.

As before, this means a 1373cc 1.4-litre twin-cam direct-injection turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine, mounted transversely and driving all four wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, with paddle shifters included.

No manual gearbox is available.

Power is rated at 103kW at 5500rpm and the 220Nm torque maximum kicks in from 1500-4000rpm. Kerb weight has jumped 90kg, from 1170kg to 1260kg (1290kg for Prestige), mainly due to the adoption of AWD.

Speaking of which, the AllGrip AWD transmission has four modes – Auto (front-drive only unless loss of traction is detected), Sport (with up to 50 per cent of torque goes to the rear wheels), Snow (offering up to 30 per cent rear-wheel drive) and Lock. Ground clearance is rated at 175mm.

Steering is via an electric rack and pinion set-up, the front suspension is a MacPherson strut-style design and the rear end uses a torsion beam arrangement. All wheels are 17-inch, and each contains a disc brake.

The HS +EV backs its electric features with a relatively large 16.6kWh battery pack, allowing it a purely electric driving range rated at 63km.

This is on the more lenient NEDC standard, though, and our car was reporting between 40–45km on a full charge. Still pretty good for a plug-in hybrid mid-size SUV.

As a result of this well-supported system, +EV versions of the HS have an official/combined cycle fuel consumption figure of 1.7L/100km, but as with all plug-in hybrids this will depend on how you use it.

On my week-long test, the car returned a figure of 3.9L/100km, with the caveat I did run it out of charge on more than one occasion. The HS’s turbocharged engine requires mid-grade 95RON unleaded.

Take a moment to appreciate this mid-sizer still used less fuel than a tiny hatchback, but charging is a less impressive story.

MG says the +EV will charge to 100 per cent from the reserve level in five ours on a 7.0kW charging connection, the only problem is the numbers don’t add up.

If you divide 16.6 by five you get 3.3kW, which is the actual charging rate. For a battery this big, that’s too slow. To put it in perspective, it’s only slightly faster than if you were to charge it up from a wall socket, and makes this car best for those who can trickle charge it at home.

Even dragging out your grocery shop to, say, 2.5 hours, will only net you half this car’s battery, making it inconvenient if you need to rely on public charging to get by.

The S-Cross averages 6.2 litres per 100km, with a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 145 grams per kilometre. Reflecting a 90kg-odd kerb weight hike, this is up from 5.9L/100km (for a 138g/km rating) in the previous model.

Driven quite hard at times on country roads, our trip computer showed an average of 10L/100km, which actually reflects the S-Cross’ sporty personality... as well as a non-run-in odometer starting mileage of just 180km.

On the flipside, the 1.4-litre turbo prefers the 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Okay, so once you get past the weird seating position we mentioned earlier, it's immediately apparent this hybrid version of the HS is the best to drive in the range.

The powerful electric motor in this car makes it so much smoother and easier to drive than the combustion car. It’s got quiet, smooth acceleration and a nice gentle regen braking, and you never even need to worry about what the transmission is doing.

This 10-speed automatic is so smooth it’s hard to tell what it’s doing at any given time, an out-of-sight improvement over the dual-clutch automatics which appear elsewhere in the range.

Where the HS isn’t as impressive is in the steering. It’s nicely weighted but a bit vague when it comes to feeling. I’m not super confident of what the front wheels are doing, and I feel like it doesn’t handle the additional weight from the big battery pack particularly well.

It feels comparatively top-heavy with a tendency towards mild understeer when you push it, missing some of the confidence its more established rivals have.

The ride is mixed. It’s generally soft, so it’s comfortable over smaller bumps, but when you hit big ones, it is evident the ride lacks a bit of control, because it will bounce around, and feel a little unsettled.

This imbalanced ride and handling is one of MG’s weak spots generally, which is why I’m surprised the electric drivetrain is so sleek, even comparable to Toyota systems.

When it comes to controlling those electric driving functions the HS defaults to a hybrid mode, where it seems to use primarily electric drive at lower speeds, activating the engine automatically at higher speeds, or when the accelerator is more heavily applied.

The only issue I have with this mode is I’m not sure at times how or why it decides to run the engine. With rival systems you’ll get some kind of ‘eco’ indicator which gives you an idea of when the engine will activate, but in this car there’s just a percentage indicator on the dash, which isn’t too helpful.

Your only other drive mode option is to stick it in EV mode, which you can do via a button on the centre console. In this mode it will only use the electric motor, and it’s able to do this at quite high speeds, so even if you’ve got a bit of an expressway or something on your drive it won’t necessarily need combustion support. Meaning you can have genuinely fully electric driving if you’ve got somewhere to charge it up at either end.

There’s no combustion or charge mode like some plug-ins have, and there is also no way to control the regen braking, so it’s not as customisable as we’d like. And the regen tune is relatively mild, so it’s probably not as energy efficient as it could be, either.

Still, the hybrid systems are impressively smooth and as a result the +EV versions of the HS are simply the best in the range to drive by a solid margin.

Here’s the biggest surprise about the new S-Cross: it does not drive like a nine-year old design.

That’s mainly thanks to the energetic and effective performance offered by the 1.4-litre turbo Boosterjet petrol engine. But we can also credit Suzuki’s chassis engineers for creating a smooth and agile handling machine as well.

Let’s start with that powertrain.

Unlike many rivals, the S-Cross benefits from having a torque-converter auto rather than a CVT continuously variable transmission, which means it accelerates off the line seamlessly like the latter, yet changes up and down through each gear ratio with a prompt, discernible step. The gearbox responds instantly if you need to access a lower gear for extra power and does not drone if you floor the throttle for whatever reason.

While having six forward gears might sound a bit too few in 2022, the auto is tuned to work within the turbo engine’s torque band, and so there’s always a ready supply of muscle as required; if you need extra performance, it comes on quickly, strongly and very smoothly, providing the reassurance of fast overtaking power on the open road.

The 1.4T remains one of our favourite powertrains, period, and is by far the best thing about the S-Cross.

Most drivers will also appreciate the light steering, which makes for easy parking as well as effortless low-speed manoeuvrability, so it’s great around town.

However, the steering effort could certainly use a bit more weight at higher speeds, as it’s just too light, especially considering how balanced and predictable the handling and roadholding are. The S-Cross corners with agility and accuracy, and goes exactly where you point the front wheels. Even a little more resistance and feedback from the steering would benefit the driver as a result, especially in wet conditions.

We never had the chance to drive the Suzuki in the rain, so can’t say if the AWD system adds another layer of roadholding grip or confidence. But on gravel, the handling remains neutral and composed, so we hold out hope that the same would also apply over wet roads.

Fitted with quality Continental EcoContact6 tyres, the S-Cross also felt quiet and refined out on the highway roads we tested it on, while offering a decent level of suppleness over bumpier surfaces. Again, a more thorough drive in urban conditions is required to see if the ride quality matches our initial impressions.

Overall, then, the MY23 S-Cross drives and feels like a newer vehicle than its near-decade old design suggests. Much of that is due to the speed and sophistication of its Boosterjet powertrain, but the overall chassis dynamics have long been sound anyway.

We weren’t expecting such a positive driving outcome.

No ANCAP crash test rating information has been released by Suzuki for the S-Cross.

The pre-facelift version managed to score five stars, but that was back in 2013. It lacked some essential safety technologies, that have now made it to the MY23 model, including autonomous emergency braking (AEB), Lane Departure Warning, Blind Spot Monitoring, Rear Cross-traffic Alert, Weaving Alert (a driver-drowsiness warning prompt) and front/rear parking sensors as standard.

It also gains adaptive cruise control with full stop/go functionality, high beam assist and auto-on/off headlights, building on the old model’s seven airbags, electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake-assist.

There is no information regarding the operating range of the AEB tech.

Along with a trio of child-seat tether anchorages, the S-Cross’ rear seat base features two ISOFIX attachments.

MG has tweaked its ownership promise for its electrified models recently. While the brand generally follows in the footsteps of challenger brands like Kia by offering an ahead-of-the curve seven-year warranty, this has only just been extended to the +EV variants.

Strangely, there’s also a seven-year, unlimited kilometre warranty for the high-voltage battery components, which is a bit different from the industry standard eight-year/160,000km warranty.

Capped price servicing has also been added covering the duration of the warranty. Each visit at 12 monthly or 10,000km intervals costs between $265 and $968, for a yearly average of $403.14.

Not expensive, but also not at the cheap end of the spectrum.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while published basic capped-price servicing is available. In the previous model with exactly the same powertrain, prices started at $239 (years one and five) and reached as high as $429 (year four).