Mazda CX-90 vs Mercedes-Benz GLB

What's the difference?

There are many reasons I quite like this CX-90. It sells the plush luxury promise when it comes to its interior and design, it feels big and purposeful, and has a refreshingly minimalist approach to its cabin tech. As a seven-seat SUV it’s particularly impressive, with plenty of amenity and a third row that can genuinely fit an adult in comfort.

However, there are areas where it could use more polish, from the drivetrain to the ride, and it ultimately strikes an odd point for price and ownership which feels lost between the premium segment and the mainstream rivals.

If you’re a long-term Mazda owner, I still think you’ll love it, and this Touring grade is definitely the best value in the range. It offers the lion’s share of equipment at a price more comparable to Mazda’s traditional mainstream rivals.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB is an oddball. While it isn’t my definition of beauty, it's a surprisingly capable and spacious small-to-medium SUV.

The entry-level GLB200, while comfortable, feels a bit underdone in the engine department. Therefore the mid-spec GLB250 with the more-powerful 2.0-litre turbo and mild-hybrid assistance plus all-wheel drive grip is the better pick.

The CX-90 is an impressive car to behold. Moving things onwards and upwards from its CX-9 predecessor, the CX-90 is bigger and even more refined in a lot of ways.

Mazda’s signature design language has evolved into something a bit beefier, trading out the delicate sharp angles and chromes of its front-wheel-drive predecessors for something a bit more upright, with a wide stance and tough proportions.

The long bonnet and expansive body panels stress the long-engined, fluid nature of this car’s design language. It certainly gives it a more premium vibe than the boxy American-influenced style of the Hyundai Palisade, and leans more European than the science-fiction styling of something like the Kia Sorento.

If anything, there’s some clear BMW influence in the shape of the tail and light fittings. Light lashings of chrome keep it in-line with Mazda’s previous design language, and on this base model at least, plastic claddings over the arches toughen it up a bit.

Inside is plush. In fact, it’s treading on Lexus territory when it comes to the design and feel of the seats, dash, doors and there are even padded leather touches down the sides of the centre console for your knees to rest against. Even the standard leather seats are nice (with softer Nappa leather available on higher grades), and I actually find the somewhat monochrome interior treatment on our test car to be the most modest option. It’s off-set by silver trims and a touch of chrome in the steering wheel and doors.

The dash is in a more traditional style (again, it feels influenced by BMW here) with a padded insert across the front, inset vents and a climate control panel leading down to a nice wide console with tasteful patterned trims, and an electronic shifter. The screen in this base car is of modest dimensions compared to most cars today, but those who aren’t sold on giant touchscreens will love it.

Even the digital dash elements are tastefully executed, although they’re not particularly customisable, which is a shame. 

This isn’t the prettiest car ever. It has the Mazda CX-8 or CX-80 effect where you can tell a smaller car has been stretched and extended to create more interior space. It just looks a little awkward as a result.

The rear section of the GLB in particular is much higher and boxier than the GLA which makes it look rather back-heavy. Thankfully roof rails are standard which toughens the look somewhat.

The facelift that was introduced in 2023 brought an updated front bumper, as well as tweaked LED headlight and tail-light signatures. The changes aren’t wildly different from the original car that launched in 2019 but it’s still fresh enough.

Inside is where this car is starting to look its age. While Mercedes-Benz was one of the first to introduce a wraparound screen set-up combining the digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system into a single unit, many have copied this and it no longer looks unique.

It doesn’t help that the dual 10.25-inch screens are small now in comparison to newer rivals. It’s standard for a digital instrument cluster to be closer to 12.3-inches in diameter now.

A main interior change with this facelift included the removal of the touchpad controller on the centre console. In its place is now a shallow storage area which doesn’t really serve a purpose.

There’s also a new AMG-style steering wheel as standard which has fiddly gloss black touch sliders that get grimy upon use.

While the changes are welcome, the ageing roots are still present. You can’t escape the blingy touches that just end up looking cheap and tacky.

A key example of this are the air vents which have obnoxious interior ambient lighting in them to try and make the cabin look cool.

I’m also not a huge fan of the star pattern trim on the dashboard and the swathes of stainless steel-looking inlays.

The CX-90 is enormous, but despite its long bonnet, it feels on the inside like it makes good use of its dimensions.

Up front, it’s easy to find a seating position thanks to an array of adjustability, from the seats to the telescopic adjust for the wheel, and the cabin is wide and tall enough to accommodate pretty much anyone with ease.

Unlike some Mazdas which have a strange zoom-factor on their rear vision mirrors, the CX-90 doesn't have this problem, and visibility generally out the windows is impressive. I can see the long, tall bonnet and cosy dash design creating visibility issues for shorter drivers, however.

Padded materials are everywhere they should be (and more), and when it comes to storage there’s a large bottle holder in each front door, two more cupholders in the centre console (with a flip-out cover), a split-opening centre console box (which hides USB-C connections, great for cable management) and a wireless charging bay up front below the climate unit.

It’s rare these days to see a full array of physical buttons and toggles for a dual-zone climate set-up, but the Mazda has the whole lot. It’s a breeze to adjust on the fly and integrates into the design in a subtle way.

It’s also worth calling out the multimedia screen isn’t a touch unit. Instead, you need to control it through a handful of buttons and a rotary dial on the centre console. It’s nice to have a physicality to it, and it works well for the relatively simple base operating system, but it’s a clumsy way to interact with phone mirroring.

In my experience Apple CarPlay has simply too many icons and menu features to work around with a dial-operated system, to the point where it’s distracting to use on-the-go (thus, defeating the purpose of having physical controls).

The second row is a real highlight. Set to its default position, I have leagues of legroom behind my own driving position (at 182cm tall). Again, heaps of width and headroom here, and even the huge rear doors open nice and wide, which should make loading luggage and fitting child seats easy.

The seat trim is just as good as it is in the front, with decent side bolstering, and top-notch amenities, with shades built into the windows, decent-sized bottle holders in each door, a further two in the drop-down armrest, soft pockets on the backs of each front seat, and a separate climate zone with independent temperature and fan speed controls.

There are two adjustable air vents with a lock-off, as well as two USB-C ports for power. Top marks.

The third row is usually where things get tricky for SUVs like this, but the CX-90 isn’t out of tricks yet.

Access isn’t the easiest. The second row can fold forward, but the left over aperture for clambering in, even though the doors are quite large, isn’t great, which will make it a no-go for anyone with mobility issues.

However, once you’re back there, I was surprised to find a full-sized adult like me can fit in relative comfort. With the second row set as far back as it can go, my knees are hard up against the back, but when rolled forward for more third-row space, there's still plenty of room in the middle. I was left with ample room for my knees and feet in the back seats. The seat trim also offers decent padding and comfortable trims, which is rare for most three-row SUVs, and while you wouldn’t want to be too much taller than me, the roof was just tall enough to have a little airspace above.

The armrests are hard plastic, unfortunately, but offer two large bottle holders on each side, as well as a USB-C port, and vents with decent air flow, which is again, quite rare for a three-row SUV.

I’d go so far as to say this is one of the best SUV third rows I’ve been in when it comes to space, comfort and amenity.

Now for the luggage space. I was pleased to find, even with the third row up, I could fit the largest (124 litre) CarsGuide luggage case with room to spare on either side. Officially, space here is 257L, but it’s rare to fit a case this size in a three-row SUV.

With the third row folded down, space comes in at 608 litres, which is on-par for this segment, and with the second and third row down, it tops out at 2025L.

With such space on offer it’s probably worth keeping in mind the payload, which is 580kg, and for those who want to add a trailer to the mix, the maximum towing capacity is 2500kg braked or 750kg unbraked for the 50e petrol straight-six versions like the one we’re testing here.

Up front the driver’s seat is comfortable, offering electric adjustability and lumbar support, extendable thigh support and heating. Some extra bolstering on the seat base would be nice though as it’s a little flat for my liking.

While the glossy piano black touch sliders on the steering wheel aren’t the most intuitive, I love holding this leather-wrapped wheel as it straddles the line of being thick enough but not too thick. BMW should take note…

The thin stalks behind the steering wheel are a joy to use and have a nice thwack to them. I appreciate the column-mounted gear selector as this frees up more space on the centre console, though it could be utilised better. More on this in a bit.

The digital instrument cluster offers a range of different themes to select from, though the standard version looks the nicest and offers the most customisation. It’s nice being able to put a full-width map display on the instrument cluster.

The touchscreen multimedia system offers a clean and intuitive interface that’s hard to get lost in. For the most part, however, I ended up using smartphone mirroring. Thankfully this update brought wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

It’s nice having the row of physical climate control switchgear within easy reach especially as carmakers are now integrating these into the touchscreen interface. Even Mercedes-Benz is guilty of this in its newer cars.

There isn’t a tonne of general storage on the centre console beyond the deep central box which has a split-opening lid. The wireless charger barely fits my iPhone 15 Pro Max, the cupholders are on the small side and the aforementioned storage section where the touch slider once was is useless from a storage standpoint.

Moving to the second row, it’s rather spacious for a small-ish SUV. At a leggy 182cm tall, I have plenty of leg and headroom behind my own driving position.

You’re able to slide and recline each individual seat in the second row to prioritise second-row comfort or allow more space for third-row passengers. It’s needed because third-row space is tight!

Second-row amenities include air vents mounted on the back of the centre console, various storage spaces, two USB-C ports, as well as a fold-down armrest with cupholders. Also if you stare at the back of the centre console it looks very much like a screaming face.

As already mentioned, the third row isn’t the most spacious ever, although this is a small-ish SUV so best not to expect palatial levels of room. It’s likely more for occasional use by children and it’s good to note there is airbag coverage back there.

Amenities are few and far between in the third row, limited to just a few storage spots and a USB-C port on both sides. Unfortunately there are no air vents.

At the back there’s a handsfree power tailgate which is handy if you’ve got your hands full. It opens swiftly, though with all three rows of seating upright there isn’t much room at all. Mercedes-Benz doesn’t even quote a boot capacity figure, but it’s only enough for a bag or two.

Thankfully if you’re not using the third row the benefit of this car is there’s much more boot space than the GLA. Mercedes-Benz claims there’s a generous 565L of boot space, which can further expand to 1800L with the second row folded.

Unfortunately there is no spare wheel in the GLB200 as it has run-flat tyres as standard, though regular tyres with a tyre repair kit is a no-cost option.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB200 is currently priced at $67,600 before on-road costs.

There aren’t many premium seven-seat SUVs that are this compact out there. The closest rivals would be the mid-size Volkswagen Tayron and related Skoda Kodiaq.

But for this price you can easily get something larger like a Kia Sorento, Hyundai Santa Fe or Mazda CX-80. You do have to ditch the premo badge though.

For your money you do get a generous amount of standard equipment. This includes 19-inch alloy wheels, LED headlights, dual 10.25-inch screens, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, interior ambient lighting, as well as heated front seats with electric adjustment.

However our tester was optioned with a panoramic glass sunroof ($1900) and black leather upholstery ($1539), bringing the as-tested price to $71,039 before on-road costs. This is still around $18,000 off the cheapest GLC.

A nifty reason for opting for this car over the GLA is because there’s a third row of seating. It's not the most spacious row, but when folded there is more boot space. More on this later.

The CX-90 gets a bit exciting under the bonnet with its big 3.3-litre in-line six-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine. It produces a whopping 254kW/500Nm, well above par compared to its mainstream rivals.

This engine is mated to an eight-speed automatic transmission. This is no run-of-the-mill transmission though. Instead of the usual smooth hydraulic coupling this style of transmission is known for, the Mazda uses a hybridised single clutch set-up instead.

This is in the name of efficiency. A single-clutch plate has less loss, and is therefore more fuel efficient, with a small electric motor helping to push things along as part of the mix.

The catch is, like the sometimes-derided dual-clutch automatics, it’s not as smooth to operate. More on this in the driving section.

Efficiency – What is its fuel consumption? What is its driving range? 8/10

As a result of this unusual transmission set-up, fuel efficiency isn’t bad for such a big and powerful engine, and for such a large vehicle.

The official combined fuel consumption for the CX-90 G50e is 8.2L/100km, which is already impressive, and in my week with the car over a few hundred (mostly urban) kilometres it landed close, at just 8.9L/100km.

It’s seriously impressive and runs rings around the six-cylinder Hyundai Palisade (10.7L/100km combined) while producing significantly more power than the more efficient Toyota Kluger Hybrid (5.6L/100km). On the flipside, you’ll need to fill its massive 75L fuel tank with mid-shelf 95RON fuel.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB200 is powered by a 1.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine which produces 120kW and 270Nm.

This engine also features in ‘200’ versions of the A-Class, CLA and GLA, plus versions of it also feature in the Renault Arkana, Captur, Duster, and Kangoo, as well as the Nissan Qashqai and now the new Mitsubishi ASX.

It’s mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission with drive sent to the front wheels only.

Unlike the more powerful GLB250 and AMG GLB35 all-wheel drive trims, the GLB200 is the only model to go without 48V mild-hybrid assistance in Australia. It was originally promised when this facelifted model was announced in 2023.

Mercedes-Benz claims the GLB200 can do the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds and top speed is 207km/h.

For all its clever, efficient drivetrain, the CX-90 has a bit of a mixed drive experience. Initially, it comes off as impressive. It’s plush and quiet from behind the wheel, and the primarily rear-drive nature of its drivetrain gives it the big premium steering response missing from its mostly front-drive rivals.

The flaws with its tricky transmission quickly become evident, though. The clutch constantly needing to engage in stop-start scenarios makes for a slightly jerky and uneven experience, similar to the feel of a dual-clutch auto, particularly in traffic, while the at-speed gear shifts, which in a dual-clutch tend to be much smoother are telegraphed more physically by this Mazda system.

As evidenced by the actual fuel consumption, it’s clear this system does what it sets out to, and it even feels like it could be significantly better, but Mazda will need to invest some time in calibration. For what it’s worth, it feels better than its original implementation I drove at the launch of the CX-60, which was the first car to get this system.

A subsequent software update has solved some issues, but it still can’t compare to a regular auto when it comes to smoothness.

However, the engine is immensely satisfying. The big six has a low roar when pushed, and motivates the big CX-90 with ease when you step on it. It pairs nicely with the weighty steering to make for a car which feels purposeful and satisfying to steer when it gets going.

In this sense it nails the brief of elevating Mazda out of the regular crop of front-drive seven-seat SUVs, giving it a distinct and more premium edge.

As also noted with the CX-60 though, the CX-90 has the same issue with its ride quality. It’s a little too hard to give it the kind of refined response to road imperfections we’ve come to expect from brands like Lexus and BMW. The firm response to the road helps this big heavy SUV feel controlled in the corners, but it doesn’t deal with suburban bumps how it should.

Larger hits in particular are often communicated to the cabin. The CX-90 is better than its smaller CX-60 sibling, which went so far as to have its rear dampers recalled, but the brand is even considering similar updates to this large SUV, so keep an eye out.

While this version of the CX-90, the base Touring with its smaller alloys and larger tyres, is more comfortable than any other Mazda on this new platform I’ve driven, it still leaves room for improvement.

It’s a shame, because otherwise the CX-90 is a lovely and luxurious SUV to drive, with a quiet, plush interior and a satisfying engine. It’s so close to greatness that it’s frustrating.

While this 1.3-litre turbo engine may be sufficient in the smaller A-Class and GLA, it barely scrapes by in the GLB200.

Even with one person onboard the engine has to rev out the first few gears to around 3000rpm to keep up with traffic from the lights. It doesn't have the nicest engine note either.

It doesn’t help that the dual-clutch automatic can be a little vague from a standstill, taking a beat to kick into action. This is most noticeable when doing low-speed manoeuvres or reversing.

Although initial acceleration can be on the thrashy side, rolling acceleration while at speed is a lot more linear and calm thanks to peak torque coming on tap from 2000rpm. This means the car will only downshift when it needs to.

There are a few different drive modes you can select from, but the default ‘Comfort’ mode feels the most natural. ‘Eco’ does quell some of the rev flares during initial acceleration, though the engine feels much more tardy in general.

Linked with these drive modes are the adaptive dampers. This is a very comfortable car, especially on the standard smaller 19-inch alloy wheels as there’s plenty of tyre sidewall to absorb bigger bumps.

Coupled with this is sporty steering that’s direct and makes the car feel nimble despite its 1.7-tonne kerb weight.

It really is the best of both worlds because you get the fun and sporty characteristics from the steering, plus the comfort and supple feeling from the suspension. It’s hard to fault this set-up.

In terms of noise, vibration and harshness (NVH), if you look beyond the sometimes shouty engine, this car is quiet and refined. There’s some tyre roar at higher speeds, but many European vehicles have this trait.

It’s also a benefit that this car is a little older as there aren’t many safety system-related bings and bongs that distract from the cabin ambience.

The Mercedes-Benz GLB received a five-star ANCAP safety rating based on Euro NCAP testing conducted in 2019.

It received 92 per cent in Adult Occupant Protection, 88 per cent in Child Occupant Protection, 78 per cent in Vulnerable Road User Protection and 76 per cent in Safety Assist.

As standard there are nine airbags, autonomous emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control, front and rear parking sensors, as well as a surround-view camera.

A nifty safety feature is the Pre-Safe system which tightens the seatbelts and plays a tone when it detects an imminent crash.

There are ISOFIX child seat anchor points on the outboard second-row seats, as well as on the two third-row seats. All three second-row seats, plus the two third-row seats also have top-tether points.

The usual five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the CX-90 range, with a matching five years of roadside assistance.

Servicing is required once every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, and a schedule of costs on Mazda’s website extends to seven years. Over the first five years, prices fluctuate between $469 and $1304 annually, with an average yearly cost of $693.30. The price puts this big-engined Mazda up the premium end of mainstream automakers when it comes to service costs.

The GLB200 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, like the rest of the Mercedes-Benz line-up.

Logbook servicing is every 12 months or 25,000km, whichever comes first, which is good if you do a lot of driving.

You can purchase a three-, four- or five-year service package which costs $3495, $4650 and $6185, respectively. With the latter this equals $1237 per service, which is expensive, although it is cheaper than the slightly larger GLC.