Ford Transit Custom vs Cupra Terramar

What's the difference?

Does the world need a pair of electrified Transit Custom vans? It’s not as simple a question when it comes to commercial vehicles like these, because there’s a fair chance the last-mile delivery sector is going to absolutely love the EV variant of the Ford van. Charged overnight at a depot, the EV Custom has the potential to massively reduce running costs for large and small fleets, as well as reduce downtime in terms of maintenance. It could be a big win.

But for our money, the PHEV Transit Custom is the one that offers the most promise. The usual EV compromises and range anxiety are shown the door and the plug-in driveline not only trumps the traditional turbo-diesel for running costs, refinement and actual performance, it also promises day-to-day efficiency that even the otherwise handy Ford diesel just can’t match. Win, win, we believe it’s called.

The question now is what Ford does with this driveline. Surely, as an option for the Tourneo people-mover (itself Transit Custom based, so all the hard work is done) the PHEV driveline seems like a foregone conclusion. And that’s the Transit van we’d most like to see, to be honest.

So, take these vehicles as a taste of what might be to come. The first shot in a market segment that stands to gain more than most from electrification.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

Creating a model-shared product that’s selling into a hotly contested – and crowded – marketplace is a great way to wind up with something derivative and easily overlooked. But Cupra seems to have managed to avoid that with an end result that is distinctive and has its own character within the VW family. In top-shelf VZ form, the Terramar is an entertaining drive and there’s enough driver involvement for it to be short-listed by anybody who values the journey as much as the destination.

The less powerful entry-level S version, meantime, can’t call on the services of that fabulous 2.0-litre engine and, instead, will possibly have a harder job convincing the masses of its worthiness. The lack of all-wheel drive probably won’t count for as much as the 'missing' 85kW (compared with the VZ) and some would-be buyers might find it hard to reconcile a driver’s SUV with the smaller engine in the S. Inside either variant, though, it’s prime family real estate with the clever rear seating and plenty of space and light inside. The value for money equation is pretty handy, too.

But for all that, you get the sense Cupra will need to shout about the Terramar if it’s to be heard over the general din of this fierce market segment. It would be a real shame if this car became simply a part of that background noise.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.

Functionality trumps all else in commercial vehicles, but even so, the Transit Custom is a pretty cool looking thing, particularly in Sport trim with its stripes and alloy wheels. It’s easy to see how the van might appeal to private buyers as well, both as family transport with optional rear seats and windows or decked out as a camper. Keeping the roofline below 2.1 metres also means the Custom will work in an underground car-park environment.

Inside, it’s all about function and while there are plenty of hard plastics in evidence, the sheer attention to detail regarding storage and convenience features is what you’ll remember. Maximising interior space is part of that and the Transit Custom cleverly uses front airbags mounted in the roof lining, clearing up dash-top space that has subsequently been used to locate a second glovebox.

Depending on which angle you’re looking from, the Terramar has elements of the VW Tiguan and Porsche Macan in the way it sits on the road and in the metal shapes that make up the whole. Interestingly, though, it’s probably genetically closest to the new Audi Q3 alongside which it’s built in Hungary, although there is plenty of new Tiguan in the platform and engineering aspects.

The highlights remain the nth-degree detailing that every current-model Cupra displays, combined with a sensible, practical layout. The detailing extends to what Cupra calls parametric design which, for those with their nerd on, refers to the way the little shapes moulded into the interior fan out and subtly change shape while still continuing the overall pattern.

Think of the way a nautilus shell consists of circular loops but where each one is bigger than the previous. Has car design really come to this? Apparently.

On a more practical level, the sliding rear seat is a master stroke for a vehicle like this one. The two-storey luggage floor is a nice touch, too, although the boot needs to start empty for this to be set up initially. But given Cupra’s place in the scheme of things and its continual hints at cutting-edge technology, you may ask where’s the plug-in hybrid or EV version?

The short answer is production of the plug-in hybrid model starts this week with Australian deliveries due in November this year. And an EV must surely also be on the cards given VW’s announcement that Australia will receive the SUV version of its electric offering, the ID4, and not the hatchback ID3. All of which makes an electric Terramar even more logical. We’ll keep you posted.

Here’s the meat and potatoes of a vehicle like the Transit Custom. If it can’t cut it as a workhorse, then there’s not much point in having it take up showroom space, and Ford knows that. But Ford also has loads of experience in making one and two-box vans work for their living. The fact is, these vehicles have been best-sellers in Europe for decades, so there’s plenty of back-catalogue to draw from.

Knowing that some drivers will spend a full shift in the cabin of the Transit Custom, Ford has gone to a lot of trouble finding little nooks and cubbies for things like clipboards, pens and phones to live. There’s also a fold-down centre seat that forms a small desk, two gloveboxes, and no less than four cupholders across the cabin. A large storage area lives under the flip-up passengers’ seat.

There’s a single USB-A charging port in the cabin and no less than five USB-C ports, as well as a 12-volt socket in the dashboard. Bottles can be stored in either door pocket and the front cabin steps are illuminated. A flat-bottomed steering wheel makes sliding across the cabin easier.

In the cargo bay, the walls feature protective panels and there’s a hose-out plastic mat on the floor. You’ll also find LED cargo lights, eight tie-down points in the long-wheelbase Trend and two fewer in the shorter Sport. Integrated roof racks are standard and while only one sliding side door is standard, there’s the option of a second one on the other side. The standard rear doors are the barn-door type, but open wide and back on to the vehicle’s sides to allow for fork-lift loading. A tailgate version of the rear door is optional.

There’s a load-through hatch giving a total length of 3.45m in the long-wheelbase version and, depending on what variant you choose, the payload is anything up to 1339kg. Cleverly, the top-hinged hatch cover for the load-through is held up by a magnet when in use so it doesn’t rattle against the load over bumps.

Towing capacity for either electrified Transit Custom is down from the turbo-diesel's 2800kg to 2300kg.

Keeping passengers safe in a nose-to-tail crash is a metal bulkhead with a window, but the window can be deleted as part of a security pack on the long-wheelbase variant, at which point the interior rear-view mirror becomes a camera screen. That mirror also incorporates a forward-looking dash cam.

It won’t matter to everybody, but it’s worth mentioning that the PHEV Transit has a space-saver spare wheel, while the EV variety has no spare at all.

All Fords are now connected via modem, allowing managers back at head office to receive alerts for low fuel or tyre pressure and even track their vehicles when they’re on the move. For fleet managers, this will doubtless be welcomed. For the drivers, perhaps not so much.

There’s an awful lot going on inside the Terramar, stating with all that parametric detailing. But the copper-coloured accents are a genuine point of interest and most of the touchpoints are relatively plush as well as looking good.

Given the side profile of the car and its upswept waistline, you might think the interior would be a bit dark and gloomy. There’s certainly plenty of black on show, but the view out is actually great. Even the typical over-the-shoulder blind-spot isn’t really there.

We managed to sample the entry-level S version and the range-topping VZ and, to be honest, the major difference is the cloth-and-vinyl versus leather seating. The former is okay but never threatens to feel high-end, while the leather in the VZ is quite lovely.

There’s only one catch: If you don’t like burgundy leather, you’re out of luck, because that’s all that’s offered. Optional in the S and V variants, the idea of burgundy leather in, say, a blue car sounds awful, but in the flesh, the colour is quite subtle. Classy, even.

There’s a pair of USB charge ports in the front centre console, and another pair in the rear seat. That rear pew also gets its own climate controls (tri-zone) and central air-vents and there are reading lights as well. It also splits 40/20/40 and the centre armrest folds down to include a pair of cup-holders.

But while the rear seat offers plenty of foot and headroom, knee room is a bit tighter. It’s not terrible, but this car won’t necessarily fit families with older, taller teenage kids. Up front, there’s no shortage of space although the centre console feels quite bulky and definitely separates the front-seat occupants.

You can see and feel a bit of Audi ergonomics rubbing off in the Cupra’s touchscreens and customisable layouts and, as always, we’re big fans of having physical buttons on the centre stack for climate control and other important functions.

The luggage area isn’t huge, but is quite deep and the tailgate has a kick-sensor. Bins at each corner of the cargo area keep smaller items under control, but the inky blackness of the trim in this area means it looks like a black hole when you first open it.

The Cupra Terramar certainly looks like a premium product and that theme continues when you look at the specification.

The entry-level S version gets standard kit such as paddle shifters, 18-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting, a powered tailgate with a kick-sensor, keyless entry and start, powered and heated front seats with a memory function, a head-up display, a heated steering wheel, tri-zone climate control, dual info-screens, full wireless connectivity, ambient lighting and wireless phone charging.

Major accessories include a panoramic sunroof and a stereo upgrade and leather trim option bundled together. The drive-away price for the S is $58,490.

Move up to the $66,490 (drive-away) V variant and you add (aside from the driveline stuff we’ll get to in a moment) 19-inch copper-accented alloys and hill descent control.

The VZ at $73,490 (driveaway) goes one bigger in the wheels department with 20-inch alloys, adaptive suspension, the leather and stereo upgrade package as standard, selectable engine sound, matrix headlights, expanded driver-selectable drive modes and bigger brakes.

Although they might both subscribe to the concept of electrification, under the skin the Transit PHEV and EV are quite different animals. That’s starts with the fundamentals, with the front-engined PHEV Transit Custom using front-wheel drive, and the pure EV variant placing the single electric motor between the rear wheels for a compact rear-drive layout. As per usual practice, the EV’s batteries are positioned under the floor.

That single electric motor, when fed by the standard 64kWh battery, gives the EV Transit Custom a sensible power output of 160kW and a meaningful 415Nm of torque. Thanks to the way an electric motor makes its power (and torque, more importantly) there’s no need for a conventional gearbox, so a single-speed transmission is all that’s required.

The PHEV, meanwhile, uses the combination of a 2.5-litre petrol engine, teamed with a single electric motor. Interestingly, the electric motor is more powerful than the non-turbocharged petrol engine, but when both are delivering, there’s a total of 171kW of power and 400Nm of torque. A continuously variable transmission (CVT) is fitted for maximum efficiency.

Four-wheel disc brakes are fitted on all electrified Transit Customs in deference to their greater kerb weight (just shy of 2200kg for the LWB). Independent rear suspension is also a feature on all Transit Custom variants, and has been engineered to be compatible with the one-tonne payload standard.

Ford has also fitted the PHEV Transit Custom with selectable drive modes, four in the Trend (Tow, Normal, Eco and Slippery) and five in the Sport with the addition of a, you guessed it, Sport mode. The PHEV builds on that with modes to force electric operation, store the battery power for later or use a combination of both at the car’s discretion.

The Terramar range features a choice of two petrol engines and driveline layouts, three outputs and even a mild hybrid variant. In fact, the Terramar S which uses the hybrid driveline also happens to be the entry-level version of the car.

Generally, you’d expect the hybrid version of any line-up to be a more expensive option, but in this case, the hybrid system is one of those barely-there set-ups where a 48-volt electric motor – in this case disguised as the car’s alternator – also acts as the starter motor offering a little more 48-volt acceleration when required, and then recouping some otherwise lost during braking. Most drivers would need to be told the car is a hybrid at all.

Power for the S’s 1.5-litre, turbocharged engine tops out at 110kW, while torque peaks at 250Nm and the S is front-wheel-drive. Like the other variants, the S uses a seven-speed dual-clutch auto transmission.

The next step up the Terramar ladder is badged V and it gets a turbocharged 2.0-litre engine with no hybrid assistance, but an output of 150kW and 320Nm. This will be a familiar engine to anybody who has driven a mid-sized product from the Volkswagen family in the last decade or so.

In V form, the Terramar gains a part-time all-wheel-drive system. This is not driver-selectable but instead uses sensors to know when to shift some of the torque to the rear axle. In normal circumstances, the vehicle remains fundamentally a front-wheel drive one, but under full acceleration or on low-friction surfaces, the computer will send the torque rearward to maximise grip.

The range-topper is the Terramar VZ which is endowed with a retuned version of the same 2.0-litre engine in the V, but now punching out 195kW and 400Nm. The driveline is the same as the V’s but the VZ gets a premium brake package and also adds Cupra’s version of adaptive suspension to the mix. The system can adjust the dampers at up to 1000 times per second to provide the feel and feedback the driver chooses via the selectable driving modes.

And if you want even better brakes, there’s an optional braking package for the VZ which adds six-piston front calipers and larger front rotors. You might expect the mild-hybrid version of the Terramar to be a reasonably heavy vehicle, which it is at 1696kg. But it’s a lightweight compared with the rather hefty V at 1794kg and the decidedly portly VZ at 1803kg.

Typically, for a hybrid vehicle, Ford quotes a staggering combined fuel economy figure for the Transit PHEV. In this case, that’s a marvellous, yet often unattainable 1.7 litres per 100km with tailpipe CO2 emissions of just 38 grams per kilometre.

No, you probably won’t achieve this in the real world, and our testing suggests closer to 4.2 litres per 100km in urban running which is where the PHEV shines most brightly thanks to the opportunity to harvest energy in stop-start traffic.

And even though that’s a long way from 1.7 litres per 100km, it’s still a pretty impressive number for a big, heavy vehicle with garden-shed aerodynamics. Combined with the Transit’s 63-litre fuel tank, there’s a real chance of stretching fill-ups beyond the 1000km mark.

The plug-in element provides for an electric range of 54km which is off the pace for most PHEVs and means any delivery driver in a Transit Custom PHEV will be making use of the petrol engine pretty much daily.

Unlike the Transit Custom EV with its 64kWh battery, the PHEV’s smaller 11.8kW battery doesn’t allow for commercial fast chargers. Instead, you can take the battery from fully discharged to 100 per cent capacity in seven hours on a household 10-amp socket, or in four hours, 15 minutes on a 15-amp outlet, which equates to a maximum AC charge rate of 3.5kW.

The Transit Custom in EV form, meanwhile, can be charged from zero to 100 per cent capacity in 6.7 hours on an 11kW outlet, but can also make use of fast DC charging. At that point, it’ll charge from 15 to 80 per cent in 32 minutes at its maximum charge rate of 125kW.

Ford claims a range of 301km for the Transit EV Trend and 307km for the slightly lighter Sport. Both those figures are likely to be a little optimistic in the real world, but we reckon, based on our on-test power usage figure of 17kW per 100km, they might be a lot closer to the mark than many other makes claim. So, that should, theoretically, work for most delivery vans in major cities where daily distances are generally below 200km.

Cupra claims a different combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption number for each of the three engines on offer, starting with the mild-hybrid version’s 5.7 litres per 100km. The mid-spec two-litre claims 7.2 litres per 100km and the high output 2.0-litre carries an 8.2 litres per 100km claim.

The standard 55 litre fuel tank in the S, then, should be good for a theoretical range of around 950km, while the V and VZ with their slightly bigger fuel tanks should be able to cover about 830km and 730km, respectively, between trips to the pump.

It pays to keep in mind, however, that Cupra recommends all three engines are run on the pricier 95-octane fuel, rather than standard 91-octane. That will add a few dollars to every fill, but the efficiency of the engines can’t be faulted.

Interestingly, in a mix of highway and city driving, our test VZ managed about 8.5L/100km which is seriously close to the official combined number. Rarely does any car get that close to its government figure.

We’ve said it plenty of times before, but delivery vans really have come a long way. What were once bucking, sliding, pitching, screeching monsters are now almost as comfortable as a car and vastly more stable and predictable to drive even at freeway speeds.

The EV variant almost sounds and feels like a modern Melbourne tram in the way it accelerates with authority but also in near silence with only the suspension and a bit of tyre slap over sharp edges to spoil the serenity. Even then, the noises barely intrude. Tyre noise is the worst of it.

Performance is strong and effortless and this is a parcel van that accelerates like a decent car right up until about 100km/h when things start to tail off a little. The overall driving position is a bit sit-up-and-beg, but that’s actually comfy over longer distances and the seats themselves are good with plenty of padding, but not too much bolster that you need to climb over it to enter or leave the cabin.

The column-mounted gear selector is smart, but does mean the indicator stalk moves to the `wrong’ side, and confusing them can leave you in Neutral. And even though it’s a clearer, sharper result than many cars offer, the camera-screen interior rear-view mirror (if you choose the solid cargo-barrier version) is never as good as a conventional mirror. For some reason, the camera screen lacks the depth of field of a mirror and is more difficult to focus on. Those who wear reading glasses might struggle with it.

On the plus side, the EV variant’s one-pedal-driving setting is brilliantly set up and allows for bringing the Transit Custom to a complete stop without touching the brake pedal. Also better than average is the calibration for the driver aids including the lane-keeping assistance which is there to help, but never call the shots.

The PHEV version is, logically, more of the same, although the ride quality seems a little better with an extra layer of plush particularly on smaller, sharper bumps. The slightly lower kerb mass that allows for the one-tonne payload without the same spring firmness is probably the reason.

What the front-drive PHEV can’t achieve, however, is the EV’s level of power-down and grip. Floor the throttle and the PHEV will easily make its front tyres chirp and introduce a small amount of tugging at the wheel. Over bumps with lots of throttle, the PHEV will also momentarily lose traction, but meantime, it’s just as quick as the EV version, even if the CVT is evident in the way the engine revs up and the rest of the van eventually catches up with it.

Let’s start with the S model and its mild hybrid driveline. Frankly, if you can pick this is a hybrid of any sort, you’re doing very well. Sure, any hybrid tech should aim to be as transparent as possible, but this time around, it’s pretty much totally invisible.

So, in the absence of too much electric thrust, the petrol engine is left to do the heavy lifting. And, frankly, with just 110kW to propel it, the 1.5-litre engine has its work cut out. It’s perfectly fine at cruising velocities, but start asking the tough question in hilly country or when powering out of slow corners, and it can all start to feel and sound a bit busy. And yet there’s not the thrust to back up the perception of mechanical activity.

The seven-speed dual-clutch does a good job, but it too is kept mighty occupied by the task of improving velocity. Flapping at the paddle shifters might keep you happy for a while, but the transmission has its own smarts sufficient to make the most of those 110kW.

Which means, of course, the VZ variant is the one for keener drivers. But even then, the excellence of the 2.0-litre turbo when fitted to the Golf GTi is dulled a little when hauling around the Terramar's 1.8 tonnes. It still feels pretty perky, however, and this is certainly not a comparison between a very fast Golf and an SUV, so it’s fair to say the Terramar VZ gets along pretty well.

Again, the dual-clutch auto is your friend, although we reckon its shifts and shift-patterns might have been backed off a little to suit the heavier Cupra.

Ride quality is slightly superior in the S version (18-inch tyres play 20-inch on the VZ) but either specification is tied down pretty well with minimal body roll for this type of vehicle. That plays slightly against outright comfort, but the cabin remains quiet with very little suspension or tyre noise making it inside.

What’s a bit confusing is the way the adaptive dampers have been set-up in the VZ. Rather than using the 'Comfort' drive mode to soften the dampers for small, pattery bumps, Cupra seems to have concentrated on more dramatic, larger wheel movements for the 'Sport' setting. So, the mode-to-mode ride is very, very similar in normal work, but firms up a reasonable amount over longer, swooping bumps that start to use more and more of the available travel.

By far our biggest complaint is that old cracked record about the driver-assistance systems being too insistent. The Terramar is by no means the worst we’ve sampled, but the lane-keeping assistance is over-zealous to the point where you’ll turn it off (defeating the purpose of its inclusion). And the driver distraction alert is just flat out annoying for its habit of confusing any facial expression other than Blue Steel as a clue that you’re nodding off.

Speaking of such technologies, you’d expect all the latest driver assistance aids from a brand like Cupra, and you won’t be disappointed. There’s adaptive cruise control with follow-and-stop abilities, lane-keeping warning and assistance, collision warning, autonomous emergency braking, pedestrian and cyclist recognition, swerve-assist, traffic sign recognition, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors, a 360-degree camera view, driver distraction warning and tyre pressure monitoring.

As well as seven airbags including a centre-front bag, there are also three top-tether restraint mounts in the rear seat and ISOFIX mounts on the outboard rear positions. ANCAP has given the Terramar a maximum five-star safety rating with a 2025 date stamp.