Ford Transit Custom vs Renault Master

What's the difference?

Does the world need a pair of electrified Transit Custom vans? It’s not as simple a question when it comes to commercial vehicles like these, because there’s a fair chance the last-mile delivery sector is going to absolutely love the EV variant of the Ford van. Charged overnight at a depot, the EV Custom has the potential to massively reduce running costs for large and small fleets, as well as reduce downtime in terms of maintenance. It could be a big win.

But for our money, the PHEV Transit Custom is the one that offers the most promise. The usual EV compromises and range anxiety are shown the door and the plug-in driveline not only trumps the traditional turbo-diesel for running costs, refinement and actual performance, it also promises day-to-day efficiency that even the otherwise handy Ford diesel just can’t match. Win, win, we believe it’s called.

The question now is what Ford does with this driveline. Surely, as an option for the Tourneo people-mover (itself Transit Custom based, so all the hard work is done) the PHEV driveline seems like a foregone conclusion. And that’s the Transit van we’d most like to see, to be honest.

So, take these vehicles as a taste of what might be to come. The first shot in a market segment that stands to gain more than most from electrification.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

If you’re after a budget-conscious offering in the large van segment, the Renault Master could be a really solid proposition. It falls short of the safety expectations set by its newer rival, though, and that’s something you might not be able to put a price on.

Functionality trumps all else in commercial vehicles, but even so, the Transit Custom is a pretty cool looking thing, particularly in Sport trim with its stripes and alloy wheels. It’s easy to see how the van might appeal to private buyers as well, both as family transport with optional rear seats and windows or decked out as a camper. Keeping the roofline below 2.1 metres also means the Custom will work in an underground car-park environment.

Inside, it’s all about function and while there are plenty of hard plastics in evidence, the sheer attention to detail regarding storage and convenience features is what you’ll remember. Maximising interior space is part of that and the Transit Custom cleverly uses front airbags mounted in the roof lining, clearing up dash-top space that has subsequently been used to locate a second glovebox.

The front-end styling of the Master has been modernised with a “robust” new look which sees it adopt a more upright nose with a bulkier grille, squared-off headlights (with LED daytime running lights as standard, along with halogen headlights).

There were no other changes made to the exterior, so if you see it side on or from the rear, you’d be hard pressed to tell if it's the new model.

This is the second facelift for this generation (X62) Master, which originated back in 2010. It is also offered in some markets as a Nissan, Opel, and Vauxhall. And this version certainly freshens up the appearance, though the practicality of the Master line-up remains unchanged.

That’s a good thing: you can still get the van as a short-wheelbase with low roof (L1H1), a mid-wheelbase with mid roof (L2H2), a long-wheelbase with mid roof (L3H2), or an extra-long-wheelbase with high roof (L4H3). There’s also the choice of a single cab-chassis Platform ute model, too. 

Our test model is the L2H2, meaning dimensions of 5575mm long on a lengthy 3682mm wheelbase (giving it a 13.6-metre turning circle), while the width is 2070mm and the height is 2499mm. Too tall for car parks (and drive-thru windows, in this age of social distancing). 

The good news about the height, though, is that it allows you excellent interior dimensions. The cargo hold of this version is 3083mm long, 1765mm wide (and 1380mm between the wheel-arches, enough for Aussie pallets to slide in easily), and the height is 1894mm inside. I’m six-foot tall (1820mm) and that meant I could safely step in and out of the cargo zone without fear of hitting my head. The load space is 10.8 cubic metres in this spec. 

As you’ll see in the interior section, the cabin has been given a bit of attention too - you can see it in the images below.

Here’s the meat and potatoes of a vehicle like the Transit Custom. If it can’t cut it as a workhorse, then there’s not much point in having it take up showroom space, and Ford knows that. But Ford also has loads of experience in making one and two-box vans work for their living. The fact is, these vehicles have been best-sellers in Europe for decades, so there’s plenty of back-catalogue to draw from.

Knowing that some drivers will spend a full shift in the cabin of the Transit Custom, Ford has gone to a lot of trouble finding little nooks and cubbies for things like clipboards, pens and phones to live. There’s also a fold-down centre seat that forms a small desk, two gloveboxes, and no less than four cupholders across the cabin. A large storage area lives under the flip-up passengers’ seat.

There’s a single USB-A charging port in the cabin and no less than five USB-C ports, as well as a 12-volt socket in the dashboard. Bottles can be stored in either door pocket and the front cabin steps are illuminated. A flat-bottomed steering wheel makes sliding across the cabin easier.

In the cargo bay, the walls feature protective panels and there’s a hose-out plastic mat on the floor. You’ll also find LED cargo lights, eight tie-down points in the long-wheelbase Trend and two fewer in the shorter Sport. Integrated roof racks are standard and while only one sliding side door is standard, there’s the option of a second one on the other side. The standard rear doors are the barn-door type, but open wide and back on to the vehicle’s sides to allow for fork-lift loading. A tailgate version of the rear door is optional.

There’s a load-through hatch giving a total length of 3.45m in the long-wheelbase version and, depending on what variant you choose, the payload is anything up to 1339kg. Cleverly, the top-hinged hatch cover for the load-through is held up by a magnet when in use so it doesn’t rattle against the load over bumps.

Towing capacity for either electrified Transit Custom is down from the turbo-diesel's 2800kg to 2300kg.

Keeping passengers safe in a nose-to-tail crash is a metal bulkhead with a window, but the window can be deleted as part of a security pack on the long-wheelbase variant, at which point the interior rear-view mirror becomes a camera screen. That mirror also incorporates a forward-looking dash cam.

It won’t matter to everybody, but it’s worth mentioning that the PHEV Transit has a space-saver spare wheel, while the EV variety has no spare at all.

All Fords are now connected via modem, allowing managers back at head office to receive alerts for low fuel or tyre pressure and even track their vehicles when they’re on the move. For fleet managers, this will doubtless be welcomed. For the drivers, perhaps not so much.

Like all vans in this segment there are some cabin smarts that will make your life a lot easier if you spend a lot of time in the cockpit.

There are storage options aplenty, including overhead folder holders, a trio of dash-top storage caddies, dash-top cup holders, huge door pockets with bottle holders, some smaller storage cubbies near the shifter, and a glovebox that is, in the French tradition, good to hold a pair of gloves and not much else. This model had the dual passenger bench seat, with a hidden storage section underneath, and you can fold the middle seat down to form a desk platform with cup holders if that’s what you need.

Along with the storage smarts, the updated Master has seen some major changes in terms of infotainment intelligence, too. The new 7.0-inch MediaNav touchscreen system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto is a welcome advancement for the brand, and during my time in the vehicle it proved simple to use and quick to react. The sound isn’t terrific, with just two speakers fitted, and I had to turn it up pretty loud to overcome the wind noise from this mid-roof model.

The driver’s seat is comfortable and offers decent adjustment, with height and lumbar adjustment. It’s easy to step up into the cab, too, despite there not being side grab handles. The driver also gets a new digital instrument display section on the redesigned dashboard, which includes a gear-shift indicator (but not a gear position indicator), and a digital speedometer and trip computer.

The steering wheel is new, too, and it’s much nicer than the old grainy plastic number in the pre-facelift version. Gone are the round vents across the dash and round plastic sections of the old model - now there are squared-off, more modern looking finishes that clearly aim to mimic the exterior’s now boxy-edged body.

In the cargo zone there are multiple tie-down hooks (eight on the floor, four on the side wall pillars), making for plenty of options to secure a load - though as can often be found with these eye-hook points, they can be a little too far inboard to make good use of, and in the Master’s case, there are no tie-down points rear of the wheel-arches. There is a 12-volt outlet in the back pillar, however.

The 2020 update for the Renault Master saw prices adjusted to compensate for additional standard equipment now offered range wide.

You can read the full pricing and specs breakdown story here, but the standard goodies for the Master include: a new 7.0-inch touchscreen media system with USB input, Bluetooth, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, sat nav and reversing camera display, a two-speaker sound system, rear parking sensors, 16-inch steel wheels with a full size spare fitted under the rear body, body-protective cladding, twin-view side mirrors with electric adjustment, electric windows, cruise control, air conditioning, remote central locking, halogen headlights, LED daytime running lights, and rear fog lights. 

The list price for the L2H2 mid-wheelbase manual model used in this review is $47,490 plus on-road costs (RRP or MSRP), but Renault is advertising this exact spec for $47,990 drive-away, which is pretty compelling - you don’t even need to be an ABN holder for that discount. 

The Master MWB van comes as standard with barn doors at the rear (270-degree opening), and a sliding side door on kerb side (left), while SWB models get 180-degree barn doors. It also features a steel bulkhead as standard, as well as a three-seat layout up front. There’s a handy lift-up base on the bench part of the seat, which allows you about 100 litres of hidden storage if you need it.

There are numerous options for buyers to customise their van to suit what they need. There are several packs to choose from, such as: the Trade Pack - wooden floor, full height timber wall lining, rear step, LED ceiling lights ($1600); the Business Pack - front fog lights, hands-free key card and push-button start, chrome exterior and interior trim finishes ($1000); and the Convenience Pack - auto high/low beam lights, lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring and front parking sensors ($1000).

You can option individual elements such as a driver’s side sliding door ($800), a driver’s suspension seat ($800 - removes the side airbag for the driver), a single passenger seat ($200 - N/A with driver suspension seat, adds passenger-side airbag protection), and if you choose RWD model there’s an available differential lock ($1000). Last but not least, you can have glazed dual sliding doors for $800, but only if you also option the Trade Pack.

Colour options include no-cost solid paint finishes in white, grey, dark blue, light blue, yellow, orange and red (the interesting colours will need to be pre-ordered). There are also three metallic paint options in grey, black or a silver/blue look, and the cost there is $1000.

Although they might both subscribe to the concept of electrification, under the skin the Transit PHEV and EV are quite different animals. That’s starts with the fundamentals, with the front-engined PHEV Transit Custom using front-wheel drive, and the pure EV variant placing the single electric motor between the rear wheels for a compact rear-drive layout. As per usual practice, the EV’s batteries are positioned under the floor.

That single electric motor, when fed by the standard 64kWh battery, gives the EV Transit Custom a sensible power output of 160kW and a meaningful 415Nm of torque. Thanks to the way an electric motor makes its power (and torque, more importantly) there’s no need for a conventional gearbox, so a single-speed transmission is all that’s required.

The PHEV, meanwhile, uses the combination of a 2.5-litre petrol engine, teamed with a single electric motor. Interestingly, the electric motor is more powerful than the non-turbocharged petrol engine, but when both are delivering, there’s a total of 171kW of power and 400Nm of torque. A continuously variable transmission (CVT) is fitted for maximum efficiency.

Four-wheel disc brakes are fitted on all electrified Transit Customs in deference to their greater kerb weight (just shy of 2200kg for the LWB). Independent rear suspension is also a feature on all Transit Custom variants, and has been engineered to be compatible with the one-tonne payload standard.

Ford has also fitted the PHEV Transit Custom with selectable drive modes, four in the Trend (Tow, Normal, Eco and Slippery) and five in the Sport with the addition of a, you guessed it, Sport mode. The PHEV builds on that with modes to force electric operation, store the battery power for later or use a combination of both at the car’s discretion.

The power outputs and torque figures depend on the transmission you choose. 

Despite the fact that both manual and automatic versions of the Master run a 2.3-litre four-cylinder diesel engine, there’s a difference between the engines: the version with the six-speed manual transmission is a twin-turbo unit, while the six-speed automated manual transmission makes use of a single-turbo diesel.

There’s not much in it when it comes to the difference in outputs, however.

The manual version has a slight horsepower advantage, with 120kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 360Nm of torque (at 1500rpm).

The automated manual has a maximum power of 110kW (at 3500rpm) and 350Nm of torque (at 1500rpm).

Both transmissions are geared the same across all six ratios, though from experience, the automated manual is best left at the showroom. While rivals offer conventional torque converter automatic gearboxes to appeal to a broader customer base globally, the French brand persists with its pernickety somewhat-auto option instead.

The majority of models in the Master range are front-wheel drive (FWD), but there are a couple of long-wheelbase rear-wheel drive (RWD) models available. None are all-wheel drive (AWD) or four-wheel drive (4WD).

You might be interested to note the weight specs for the Master range. There are too many variables to bore you with here, but the details on the L2H2 mid-wheelbase manual I tested, according to Renault Australia, are as follows: kerb weight - 1887kg; gross vehicle mass/GVM - 3510kg; payload - 1623kg; towing capacity - 750kg un-braked, 2500kg braked. The gross combination mass (GCM) is 6000kg.

Typically, for a hybrid vehicle, Ford quotes a staggering combined fuel economy figure for the Transit PHEV. In this case, that’s a marvellous, yet often unattainable 1.7 litres per 100km with tailpipe CO2 emissions of just 38 grams per kilometre.

No, you probably won’t achieve this in the real world, and our testing suggests closer to 4.2 litres per 100km in urban running which is where the PHEV shines most brightly thanks to the opportunity to harvest energy in stop-start traffic.

And even though that’s a long way from 1.7 litres per 100km, it’s still a pretty impressive number for a big, heavy vehicle with garden-shed aerodynamics. Combined with the Transit’s 63-litre fuel tank, there’s a real chance of stretching fill-ups beyond the 1000km mark.

The plug-in element provides for an electric range of 54km which is off the pace for most PHEVs and means any delivery driver in a Transit Custom PHEV will be making use of the petrol engine pretty much daily.

Unlike the Transit Custom EV with its 64kWh battery, the PHEV’s smaller 11.8kW battery doesn’t allow for commercial fast chargers. Instead, you can take the battery from fully discharged to 100 per cent capacity in seven hours on a household 10-amp socket, or in four hours, 15 minutes on a 15-amp outlet, which equates to a maximum AC charge rate of 3.5kW.

The Transit Custom in EV form, meanwhile, can be charged from zero to 100 per cent capacity in 6.7 hours on an 11kW outlet, but can also make use of fast DC charging. At that point, it’ll charge from 15 to 80 per cent in 32 minutes at its maximum charge rate of 125kW.

Ford claims a range of 301km for the Transit EV Trend and 307km for the slightly lighter Sport. Both those figures are likely to be a little optimistic in the real world, but we reckon, based on our on-test power usage figure of 17kW per 100km, they might be a lot closer to the mark than many other makes claim. So, that should, theoretically, work for most delivery vans in major cities where daily distances are generally below 200km.

There is no official combined fuel consumption claim figure stated by Renault, as the vehicle falls into the heavy commercial vehicle space. 

But I can tell you it’s pretty impressive for fuel economy. I saw an average of just 8.5 litres per 100 kilometres over more than 1000km of testing - more than half of which was with the van loaded up with hundreds of kilograms of load.

With a 100-litre diesel tank, you could theoretically get about 1150km to a fill, and that’s with a mix of loaded and unloaded driving. 

One thing, though: most vehicles have a graphic on their dashboard to show which side the filler neck is - you know, you see a fuel bowser and the filler is on the right, that means your vehicle’s filler is on the right. Not in the Master. It has a graphic with the filler on the right, but the actual fuel cap is on the left. And like most vans, you have to open the passenger door to fuel up.

Worried about AdBlue? No need - the engine used in the Master range is a Euro 5 unit, so there is a diesel particulate filter, but no urea after treatment setup to mention.

We’ve said it plenty of times before, but delivery vans really have come a long way. What were once bucking, sliding, pitching, screeching monsters are now almost as comfortable as a car and vastly more stable and predictable to drive even at freeway speeds.

The EV variant almost sounds and feels like a modern Melbourne tram in the way it accelerates with authority but also in near silence with only the suspension and a bit of tyre slap over sharp edges to spoil the serenity. Even then, the noises barely intrude. Tyre noise is the worst of it.

Performance is strong and effortless and this is a parcel van that accelerates like a decent car right up until about 100km/h when things start to tail off a little. The overall driving position is a bit sit-up-and-beg, but that’s actually comfy over longer distances and the seats themselves are good with plenty of padding, but not too much bolster that you need to climb over it to enter or leave the cabin.

The column-mounted gear selector is smart, but does mean the indicator stalk moves to the `wrong’ side, and confusing them can leave you in Neutral. And even though it’s a clearer, sharper result than many cars offer, the camera-screen interior rear-view mirror (if you choose the solid cargo-barrier version) is never as good as a conventional mirror. For some reason, the camera screen lacks the depth of field of a mirror and is more difficult to focus on. Those who wear reading glasses might struggle with it.

On the plus side, the EV variant’s one-pedal-driving setting is brilliantly set up and allows for bringing the Transit Custom to a complete stop without touching the brake pedal. Also better than average is the calibration for the driver aids including the lane-keeping assistance which is there to help, but never call the shots.

The PHEV version is, logically, more of the same, although the ride quality seems a little better with an extra layer of plush particularly on smaller, sharper bumps. The slightly lower kerb mass that allows for the one-tonne payload without the same spring firmness is probably the reason.

What the front-drive PHEV can’t achieve, however, is the EV’s level of power-down and grip. Floor the throttle and the PHEV will easily make its front tyres chirp and introduce a small amount of tugging at the wheel. Over bumps with lots of throttle, the PHEV will also momentarily lose traction, but meantime, it’s just as quick as the EV version, even if the CVT is evident in the way the engine revs up and the rest of the van eventually catches up with it.

I did a mix of driving in the Master over the week I had it, including more than 600km of unladen driving. 

Why so many kays? I used it to move house, which meant I completed two “full” trips between Sydney’s inner-west and Cowra in the Central West of NSW, and two “empty” trips back to Sydney, as well.

I’ll get to how it drove with a load on board in the section below, but the unladen experience was pretty positive.

The engine and transmission are well teamed, and there’s a good amount of usable torque and very little lag to speak of. 

As with this entire generation of engines - a derivative engine in a different state of tune is used in the Nissan Navara - the refinement is mostly good until you reach higher in the rev range, where it can get a bit noisy and clattery. But the best work is done down low in the rev zone anyway. 

The manual shift action isn’t what I’d call “slinky”, more “clicky”. But it’s easy to row between gears as the action is light and the clutch isn’t too heavy, either. The gearing is generous, meaning you can saunter in sixth gear around 70km/h without the engine labouring too hard, and it’ll accelerate from there to freeway pace - provided you’re not going uphill.

There is a bit of ratio management required if you encounter a steep incline, but generally it’s a decently strong powertrain for its intended use - more on that below.

I’m always astounded about the steering and ride characteristics of vans of this size. Yes, it’s large, and yes, it can get blown around a little by crosswinds, and yes, you need to factor in the longish-wheelbase and larger turning circle that results from that… but it drives a lot smaller than it is.

The steering is direct and accurate, easy to judge at high or low speeds - which is great news when you’re parking (and there’s a good quality reversing camera and rear parking sensors, but you’ve just gotta remember the roof height, too).

The ride is adequate without a load on board, too. The independent McPherson strut front suspension copes well with changes in surface and bump control, though it can be a little bouncy at times. The rear suspension is a leaf-spring torsion beam setup, and it can be a little clumsy over road joins when unladen. 

It also brakes well, with solid and trustworthy response from the four-wheel disc brakes at all speeds.

While there has been a safety revolution in the van segment in recent years led by Mercedes and VW, Renault has been left behind to a degree.

The Renault Master has never been put through NCAP or ANCAP crash testing. So there’s no safety star rating to speak of.

And it falls short of its chief rivals, as it doesn’t have any sort of auto emergency braking (AEB) or forward collision warning system at all. 

It has a reversing camera and rear parking sensors, plus dual front airbags and driver’s side airbag protection (not passenger though?), and there are no curtain airbags either. But it has electronic stability control (ESC), electronic brake force distribution, and hill start assist with Renault’s Grip X-tend system that is designed to allow better traction in slippery situations.

You can option some safety technology into the manual versions of the Master, by way of the Convenience Pack. For $1000 it adds auto high/low beam lights, lane departure warning (not active lane keeping assist), blind spot warning (not rear cross-traffic alert), and front parking sensors.

I understand the argument that buyers shouldn’t have to pay for anything they don’t need, especially when it comes to business vehicles. But I hope that behind closed doors Renault is working furiously to improve the safety equipment offering as a matter of priority.