Fiat Scudo vs Mazda BT-50

What's the difference?

The Fiat Scudo LWB Primo offers a large payload rating, excellent fuel economy, peppy performance and practical features like its load-through flap. However, it also has shortcomings like a tiny tow rating and no sequential manual-shifting. So, only a potential buyer can determine if the positives outweigh the negatives when deciding if this largely badge-engineered European van is the right fit for their business.

Key to the success of the BT-50 XS will be acceptance by fleet buyers. The vehicle, however, seems to be pretty well considered as far as that goes, although as with any stripped-down model, there are features that will be missed. Things like the manual air-conditioning probably won’t make much difference, but the lack of a tyre pressure monitoring system is a bigger issue for a working vehicle. Performance from the smaller engine is still well within acceptable parameters, but we reckon any buyer considering using much of the 3500kg touring capacity would be better off with the 3.0-litre engine offered in the rest of the BT-50 range.

The Mazda is not the best riding of its ilk, and there are competitors with bigger cabins, although, notably, at this point on the pricing ladder, these are often from China rather than Thailand where the Mazda is built. Ultimately it will come down to whether the smaller engine and reduced performance is an issue and also whether the money saved over the bigger-engined BT-50 is enough to justify that and the loss of some creature comforts. But since fleet managers are notoriously hard-nosed about this stuff, there’s a good chance to BT-50 XS will find a market.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with meals provided.

Like its platform-sharing Peugeot Expert associate (which differs only in cosmetic changes) and other continental rivals like the Ford Transit Custom and Renault Trafic, the Scudo has a distinctive ‘Euro’ look which combines boldly sculptured bodywork with work-focused practicality.

It also employs unpainted dark grey plastic in areas most vulnerable to bumps and scrapes including the bumpers, door mirror shells, side protection strips, sliding door tracks and hubcaps.

The cabin is spacious, comfortable and visually appealing but like the exterior is designed with work in mind given its wipe-clean vinyl floor and fabric-trimmed seating for up to three crew members, comprising a driver’s bucket seat and two-passenger bench seat.

Confusingly, the SWB and LWB share the same 3275mm wheelbase. The difference between them is purely in body length, with the LWB being 330mm longer due to its extended rear overhang.

Targeting tradies and fleet customers has meant Mazda has embraced the concept of factory accessories. Right now, there are options for tougher front bumpers, bull-bars, snorkels, drop-side trays, an awning, wheel-arch flares (for bigger, aftermarket wheel and tyre packages) driving lights, roof racks, canopies, tub-drawer systems and even a dual battery set-up. All these factory options carry the full Mazda warranty.

But Mazda has gone even further with accessory packs aimed directly at different fleet markets. For instance, there’s the Mine-Spec Pack which incorporates a park-brake alarm, high-mounted brake lights, a reversing buzzer, work-lights, LED rear lighting and pre-wired switches for auxiliary and beacon lighting.

Externally, Mazda's design brief for the BT-50 has clearly been to not frighten the horses. But it's better than that, because it has actually emerged as one of the better looking utes out there. In XS trim, even the steel wheels add a no-nonsense flavour to the overall effect. And where some of the competition appear to be trying very hard to ape the full-sized US-made pick-ups, the Mazda is its own thing.

Inside, the smaller info screens and simple layout in basic black tell the budget story. At the same time, there's a lot to like in terms of the clear, simple analogue gauges and the no-fuss controls including the conventional T-bar, park-brake and ignition key. There's a look and feel that also suggests this is a ute that should be able to take a few knocks in the course of earning a living.

Our test vehicle’s 1796kg kerb weight is relatively light, which when deducted from its 3100kg GVM leaves a substantial 1304kg payload rating of which up to 170kg can be carried on the roof.

However, in stark contrast the Scudo is only rated to tow up to 600kg, which is below the 750kg threshold for mandatory trailer brakes. And Fiat does not publish a GCM rating (how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) so we don’t know if the Scudo can carry its maximum payload while towing its maximum trailer weight.

In practical terms this tow rating would restrict users to the smallest and lightest box trailers to leave enough capacity for a decent load, which could be a deal breaker for those who need to tow heavier weights.

The cargo bay, which in LWB form provides a competitive 6.1 cubic metres of load volume, can be increased to 6.6 cubic metres by opening the large load-through flap at the lower left of the cabin bulkhead and raising the outer passenger seat’s base cushion into its vertical position.

This extends the load floor to an expansive 4024mm which allows extra-long items like timber, electrical conduit, copper/PVC pipe, carpet roles etc to slide through to the passenger footwell, which greatly increases practicality.

For example, we used this handy feature to transport several 3.6-metre wooden posts from a hardware store (see images) which would have been too long for the standard floor, so it was a convenient solution.

Our only criticism of this feature is that the flap is hinged at its base which means when opened it lies flat on the floor, which makes it more vulnerable to load damage than a top-hinged flap (like the Renault Trafic) which opens upwards and therefore out of harm’s way.

The LWB cargo bay’s load floor is 2862mm long (without using the bulkhead flap) and 1628mm wide with 1397mm from floor to roof. There’s also 1258mm between the rear wheel housings, which means it can carry up to two standard Aussie pallets or up to three Euro pallets, secured by a choice of eight load anchorage points.

The cargo bay is accessed through solid sliding doors on each side and glazed twin barn-doors at the rear (a glazed rear liftgate is available as a $700 option). The barn-doors can swing open to 270 degrees to optimise forklift and loading dock access but there are no detents in the hinges or other stays to hold them open, so they can easily swing shut in a light breeze or if parked on an incline.

There’s no standard floor protection which makes it prone to load damage but the cargo bay walls are neatly lined to mid-height plus there’s ample lighting and a handy 12V socket.

Although it can seat up to three occupants, centre seat comfort is compromised by the large dash protrusion housing the gear selector. This forces the central passenger to sit with knees skewed to the left, which also encroaches on the outer passenger’s legroom. So, a crew of three is okay for short trips but ideally should be capped at two for longer journeys.

Cabin storage includes bins in the base of each door which are big enough to carry large bottles. The dash provides cupholders on each side and a clamshell-lidded compartment in the centre plus a glove box and adjoining open storage compartment.

The Primo’s centre console has wireless phone charging in addition to the standard 12V socket and pair of USB-C ports. The centre seat backrest also folds forward to reveal a handy work desk and under its base cushion is an insulated compartment lined in polystyrene foam to help keep food and drinks hot or cold.

With a choice of cab-chassis of pick-up tub, not to mention the option of a single or dual-cab body in cab-chassis form, the XS allows for a fair bit of creativity in how it’s configured. The cab-chassis, for instance, will accept a conventional drop-side alloy tray or any number of service body configurations right up to camper bodies.

The stock tub on the pick-up version gets a drop-in liner but there’s no power outlet or light that some of the competition offer. The tie-down points are also a bit disappointing with two lower points in the rear of the tub and a pair of higher points in the front. Experience tells us that high-mounted tie-down points are vastly less practical than anchor points mounted close to the cargo floor.

The move to the larger engine has, however, increased the Mazda’s towing ability. From the previous version’s 3000kg towing limit, the new 2.2 can now legally tow 3500kg (with a braked trailer and approved tow-hitch). Payloads vary according to specification, but range from about 1000kg right up to 1379kg for the XS singe-cab-chassis.

The factory-option drop-side tray carries it’s load up high, but offers a flat floor with no wheel-arch intrusions. The standard tub is not as large in any direction, but does have a damped tailgate for safety (you can’t drop it) and convenience (the gas struts help raise it).

In the cabin, you get USB charging ports (two in the front, one in the rear seat) and there are central air-vents for the rear seat of dual-cab models. The dual-cab also has an under-seat storage area, two gloveboxes and a 60/40 split fold rear bench. The doors feature bottle holders and there’s a flip-down glasses compartment in the roof lining.

While the front seats are comfy enough for bigger drivers, the rear seat also goes against dual-cab tradition a little by having plenty of room in every direction, as well as a rational seat-back angle.

While the XS remains the entry-level BT-50 variant, you once again have the choice of two or four-wheel drive, with price-tags to match. So, starting at the start, the 4x2 XS single-cab cab-chassis now kicks off at $37,900 before on-road costs with the dual-cab pick-up (styleside) 4x2 variant at $46,710.

Move up to all-wheel drive and there’s no single-cab option. Instead, things start with the dual-cab cab-chassis 4x4 at $53,120 and the dual-cab pick-up at $54,720.

Aside from the bigger engine and stronger performance, you now get an eight-speed transmission and there’s fuel-saving stop-start tech that was once only available on higher-spec BT-50s.

Other additions for the XS include LED headlights, adaptive cruise control, wireless connectivity for both Apple Car Play and Android Auto, a reversing camera and an 8.0-inch touchscreen. There’s also digital radio and hill-descent control.

But the XS’ place at the bottom of the BT-50 ladder is confirmed with the cloth-trimmed interior, vinyl flooring and plain steel wheels for all but the dual-cab pick-up 4X4 variant which gets alloy wheels.

Which is all fine and gives the Mazda something of a pointy stick with which to poke at the incoming competitors (mainly) from China, but where does that place the XS relative to the 3.0-litre BT-50? Well, if you take the XT variant with the 3.0L engine and the same body and driveline layout, the XS comes in at just $2500 less. That’s not a huge saving either as an outright number or in terms of the monthly lease repayments.

Part of that is because Mazda has also hiked prices across the BT-50 range in tandem with announcing the new XS. Which means that spec-for-spec 1.9 versus 2.2-litre XS is now $1500 more than it was. But even if Mazda had held prices on the XS variants, would $4000 be enough of a difference? For reference, the original XS sliced $3000 off the 3.0L price when it was launched back in late 2021.

There are areas where you can see where Mazda has pulled a few dollars out of the vehicle, starting inside with the small centre touchscreen, the truly tiny central dash-cluster screen, and the cloth trim. There’s also a bit of hard plastic in evidence and the air-conditioning lacks the set-and-forget function of climate control systems. The keyless entry and start has gone and the XS is started with an old fashioned ignition key. The XS specification also loses the front and rear parking sensors and the tyre-pressure monitoring system.

You might also imagine the drum rear brakes are another giveaway but, in fact, they’re standard across the whole BT-50 line-up.

The Scudo is powered by a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine which produces 110kW at 4000rpm and 370Nm of torque at 2000rpm.

It drives the front wheels through an eight-speed torque converter auto transmission which in Australian delivered specification does not include the choice of sequential manual shifting.

Our test vehicle rides on a quartet of coil springs courtesy of MacPherson strut-style front and oblique wishbone rear suspension. Steering is via electric power-assisted rack and pinion and stopping is courtesy of four-wheel disc brakes.

The new engine capacity of 2.2 litres is up from the 1.9 of the previous XS version but still well short of the 3.0 litres of the more expensive BT-50 versions. And the specifications are pretty much exactly what you’d expect with the new 2.2 just about splitting the difference between the old 1.9 and the 3.0.

In this case, that equates to 120kW of power and 400Nm of torque, while the 1.9 was good for 110kW and 350Nm, and the 3.0 sports 140kW and 450Nm. So, yep, somewhere right about the middle. And that makes sense given the new 2.2 uses the basic mechanical architecture of the 1.9.

But the switch up to the new engine brings one very important change and that’s the adoption of an eight-speed automatic to replace the six-speed unit fitted to the previous XS and the other BT-50s. That has an obvious potential benefit for drivability, but also for fuel economy.

Mazda has also added stop-start tech to the XS in the name of efficiency. But, as we’ve found many times before, the fuel economy benefits seem restricted to the official test results rather than the real world where this technology serves to annoy many drivers more than anything else.

If you opt or the four-wheel-drive variants, you’ll get a rear diff lock but you miss out on an on-road 4x4 setting. Considering the 2.2-litre’s newfound towing capacity (the full 3500kg of the competition), that lack of a 4x4 Auto setting is a shame, but not an unexpected one at this price-point.

Fiat claims an official average combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle consumption of just 6.3L/100km and the dash display was claiming a slightly higher 7.3 figure when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our test, which covered 334km and included our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling more than one tonne of payload.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was only slightly higher at 7.8L/100km which is outstanding economy for a mid-size commercial van in real-world driving conditions. So, based on our test consumption, you could expect a lengthy driving range nudging 900km from its 69-litre diesel tank.

While one of the expected benefits of the 2.2-litre engine compared with the three-litre unit is a reduction in fuel consumption, the new 2.2 engine goes one big step further by actually being more frugal than the 1.9-litre engine it replaces. Well, in terms of the official government test, anyway.

The single cab-chassis model in new 2.2-litre, two-wheel-drive form posted a combined (urban-highway) fuel number of a creditable 6.9 litres per 100km. Compared with the mechanically similar 1.9 single cab-chassis, that’s a saving of 0.1 litres per kilometre, and a corresponding drop in tailpipe carbon emissions of 1 gram per kilometre.

To be honest, this small improvement is probably largely due to the stop-start system now fitted, which many drivers will turn off at the first opportunity. Even so, the new eight-speed transmission must also be playing a part, so let’s call the old and new engines line-ball in the real world.

The rest of the XS line-up scored official figures of 6.3 litres per 100km for the double-cab pick-up 4x2, 7.1 litres for the double cab-chassis 4x4 and 6.6 litres per 100km for the dual-cab pick-up 4x4.

With the BT-50’s standard 76-litre fuel tank, the theoretical range is more than 1000km. In reality, that’s going to be closer to 800km.

The BT-50 engines do not require AdBlue additive to reduce exhaust emissions.

It’s easy to step aboard and the car-like driving position is spacious and comfortable given I’m 186cm and have ample head and legroom with good eyelines to all mirrors. In that context, the centre seat headrest can be easily removed and stored when not required to improve the central mirror’s view through the bulkhead window.

The flat-bottom steering wheel leaves plenty of torso clearance for easy entry and exit plus there’s plenty of adjustment in the driver’s seat with its manually altered lumbar support and fold-down inboard armrest. A wide left footrest provides additional comfort and support.

Unladen ride quality is excellent given the suppleness of its four-coil suspension, enhanced by load-adaptive dampers which allow a softer ride when unladen but automatically increase damping resistance under heavy loads.

The eight-speed auto offers crisp and smooth shifting, which combined with close to 400Nm of torque and a relatively light kerb weight ensures energetic performance. Although torque peaks at 2000rpm the engine displays ample flexibility either side of that figure, which ensures good throttle response in the mostly metro driving we encountered.

The engine is relatively quiet during highway travel with most noise coming from the tyres, which can become intrusive at these speeds particularly on coarse bitumen surfaces.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 975kg into the cargo bay which combined with driver equalled a total payload of 1075kg that was about 200kg less than its legal limit. The rear suspension only compressed about 40mm under this weight which ensured plenty of travel remained and it hauled this sizeable payload with ease.

Two criticisms, the first being the absence of sequential manual shifting offered in other markets, which is desirable when hauling heavy loads in hilly terrain and optimising engine braking on steep descents.

We also noticed the traffic sign recognition (TSR) function worked fine with traditional metal signage but became glitchy when interpreting the brightly illuminated speed signs displayed on overhead motorway gantries.

Striking the right balance between ride comfort and load-lugging capacity has always been the big trick with utes in general. The fact is, there’s probably no ideal setting, especially considering the range of payloads a ute can be expected to carry on any particular day. In the BT-50’s case, Mazda has opted to go for a stiffer suspension tune. That means it can technically tow and haul with the best of them, but it also dictates that ride quality is far from what you’d call plush, even in this market segment.

The ute handles bumps best when the undulations don’t come too hot and fast. But strike a patch of high-frequency lumps and bumps and the suspension, particularly at the rear, starts to pogo about with a corresponding decline in ride control. The steering, too, seems to lack a little feel and is relatively slow-geared (although that has its benefits off-road).

The engine certainly does the job in isolation, but it’s likely to struggle a little with the full three-and-a-half tonnes on the hitch. It’s pretty noisy, too, and definitely sounds like a diesel, unlike some modern diesel designs that are more refined. There’s also a sense that Mazda has ditched some of the sound deadening of other BT-50 models, as the engine is certainly heard and felt. The optional snorkel moves the induction noise right into the driver’s window when it’s open, too.

But the new eight-speed automatic transmission is a beauty. Upshifts are crisp and smooth and even the downshifts as you approach a full stop are measured and calibrated to never intrude. And it’s nice to see a conventional T-bar shifter with no separate park button or non-intuitive movements required.

We didn’t get a chance to try the BT-50’s off-road chops, but past experience tells us that the Mazda will be pretty good. As with many four-wheel-drive utes, the limiting factor will be the standard tyres fitted at the factory.

While alloy wheels and carpets on the floor might be negotiable on a vehicle like this, a basic level of safety gear is not. So, the XS gets front, knee and side-curtain airbags, as well as givens such as anti-lock brakes and stability control.

But it doesn’t stop there with the BT-50 XS also fitted with the bulk of the current driver aids. Those include blind-spot monitoring, lane keeping assistance, lane-departure warning, rear cross-traffic alert and the reverse camera system. There’s also autonomous emergency braking which can also identify pedestrians and cyclists.

You also get Mazda’s own take on the controversial driver-attention monitor which many ute makers simply haven’t managed to get right in terms of the system’s calibration and how aggressively it acts. The BT-50’s is one of the less intrusive ones.

What’s missing? On a vehicle designed to tow big loads, a tyre pressure monitoring system is a great addition, but not one you’ll get on a BT-50 at this price. We’d also like to see an on-road 4WD setting which would allow the use of all-wheel drive when, say, towing on a bitumen road. More expensive competitors have this, but the Mazda is hardly alone in not offering this tech at this entry-level price.

The XS variant picks up the five-star ANCAP safety rating already awarded to the rest of the BT-50 line-up.

The Fiat Scudo comes standard with a five-year/200,000km warranty and five years' roadside assist which is competitive with the major players.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/20,000km whichever occurs first, which is also up there with rivals and twice as good as the Toyota HiAce’s six months/10,000km requirement.

However, local servicing costs for the Scudo are yet to confirmed, which hampers cross-shopping for potential buyers.

Fiat Professional has a relatively small national network of around 10-15 dealers.

Mazda’s standard five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty applies to the BT-50 range, and includes the first five years of roadside assistance, too.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. Capped-price servicing is available with the first five years of servicing costing $2188 on 4x2 versions and $2302 for 4x4 variants.

It’s worth mentioning that the BT-50’s new engine is Euro 5 compliant but doesn’t require AdBlue, reducing running costs.