BYD Shark 6 vs Gac Aion Ut

What's the difference?

The BYD Shark 6 Premium is perfect for weekend camping trips or ferrying the family around the city, but the underpowered engine, mixed handling, and quirky safety tech hold it back. If it could match its rivals’ capability while keeping its sharp looks, it would be a near-perfect package but right now, it just doesn’t.

The Aion UT is a cleverly-specified little hatchback and a great entry-point into electric motoring. The software needs a bit of work from a usability perspective, plus the spongy ride and cutesy styling might not be for everyone. 

However, with strong points including driving range, cabin space and value, there’s even a pitch for it in some cases to be an only car compared to most of its price rivals, which are more likely to be thought of as a second car runabout in a two-car garage.

The pick of the range is definitely the entry-level Premium. It comes in at a headline-grabbing price with specs to blow rivals out of the water, while only missing out on a few luxuries.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The BYD Shark 6 is a seriously handsome ute from almost every angle. It’s boxy and beefy enough to look tough in the school-pick-up line but not so over-styled that it feels try-hard. The wide lighting signature at the front and rear gives it a modern, tech-forward vibe which is a nice hint at what’s going on underneath.

From behind the wheel, space is the first thing you notice. The cabin feels huge and well thought out, finished in black synthetic leather with contrasting orange stitching that adds a sporty pop. You’ll spot the same orange highlights on the air vents, and together with the soft-touch trim and matt-metallic details, the Shark easily punches above its price point in terms of cabin quality.

And then there’s the centre console, which is one of my favourite parts of the interior. With its chunky grab handles, large gear selector and row of tactile switches, it has a bit of a cockpit-meets-ute look going on. The orange starter button is a fun touch too. The only quirk? The tailgate release button sits close enough that it’s a little too easy to tap by mistake and although you have to confirm the selection via the media display, it's still annoying to accidentally press.

GAC tells us the UT hatch was designed in Milan, Italy, but it also isn’t ashamed of the Chinese influence on its overall appearance, like the ultra-short bonnet and Chinese city-car style face.

Along the side it has a modern, aerodynamic profile, and the ultra-short overhangs and long wheelbase maximise the amount of room for batteries under the floor and interior space.

The rear feels a lot like a modern Mini, with its bulbous tailgate and protruding light clusters, spiced up with a sporty spoiler piece jutting out.

It’s not a bad looking thing and it’s available in an array of fun colours.

On the inside it seems to follow the established rule-book of Chinese automakers, with plush trims, big screens with minimal physical buttons as well as a contemporary two-spoke steering wheel.

There’s a trendy floating console which hosts the cupholders and wireless charger on the Luxury grade, and an array of interesting patterns and textures through the doors and dash which you wouldn’t have once seen on a car at this price-point.

However, it is worth noting that while the seats are quite nice, and the steering wheel is a stand-out touchpoint, the trims on the doors and across the dash-top are hard plastics, more so than some of this car’s rivals.

Comfort is clearly a priority in the Shark 6 Premium. There’s loads of cabin space and the powered front seats are properly plush for a ute, with four-way lumbar support plus heating and ventilation which is a luxe touch you really notice on long drives.

Up front, storage is excellent with a glovebox and dash cubby, large door bins, a deep centre console, two phone trays with a wireless charger, a USB-A and C port, cupholders and a sunglasses holder. Everything has its place, and it’s easy to keep the cabin tidy.

The rear bench is also impressive. Generous seat bases, thick padding, and a flat floor mean adults will be comfortable back there, and kids are happy too. Rear passengers score map pockets, cupholders, big door bins, directional air vents, a USB-A and C port and even a 230-volt outlet.

Despite the 230mm ground clearance, getting in and out is surprisingly easy thanks to big door apertures, side steps and grab handles. My nine-year-old found it easy to get in, though younger kids will still need a hand. He loves the great view, thanks to the low window line, but the doors feel heavy on a slope.

Tech-wise, the 15.6-inch touchscreen looks sharp and responds quickly. The system is simple enough to use once you spend some quality time with it but first-timers might get flustered initially. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto worked consistently, although most controls live inside the screen, including climate functions, which may frustrate some. The rotating display is clever, but I found portrait mode blocked some forward vision from my driving position. Also, fun fact, when CarPlay fills the full screen, everyone can see it, including cyclists who now know my husband’s nickname!

Out back, the tray is slightly smaller than key rivals but still practical, offering 790kg payload and a 1200L capacity. The soft-opening tailgate is handy but lacks gas struts, and without a step, climbing in requires a bit of a hop. On the plus side, the tub gets lighting, three 230-volt AC outlets and a full-size spare underneath.

In terms of interior space, the Aion UT stands out with its spacious cabin. At 182cm tall, I am easily able to find a comfortable seating position, and visibility out the front sides and rear, while not as good as some small SUVs, isn’t bad.

There’s lots of headroom, and while I mentioned the hard plastic door cards before, there’s enough padding everywhere your elbows are going to touch to make it feel a bit nicer than perhaps it is.

The main drawback of this car for me is the lack of tactile buttons and the frustrating software.

The main screen isn’t particularly well utilised, being taken up by either a background or the navigation map, with an array of typically small shortcuts across the bottom for important features like the climate control or settings menus.

You can pre-set a few information panels which sit above the shortcut bar as in many rival cars and there’s also a shortcut tray which can be hosted on the driver’s side and configured with a variety of shortcuts and settings.

It’s just a bit clumsy to use, and the array of poorly-labelled settings menus for things like active safety equipment feel needlessly complicated.

I’d love to see this car with physical controls for climate and multimedia to make it easier to live with.

Up front the storage is decent. There are big pockets in the doors and a large storage tray between the driver and front passenger thanks to a flat floor. There’s also a slightly weird storage box under the touchscreen which has a net inside, good for more delicate objects you don’t want flying around the cabin.

On the floating console there are two cupholders which are a bit too shallow for my liking, and the wireless charger feels almost pointless because its made of a hard plastic, so your phone just slides right off in the corners. The cabled outlets are hidden beneath which allows for tidy cable management and the centre armrest console box is a healthy size.

The rear seat is comparatively basic, although touches on the key points. Its main advantage is how generous the space is. My frame was able to fit behind my own driving position with heaps of room for my knees, and just enough room for my head despite the dip in the roof for the sunroof shade in the Luxury-grade car we tested. There may be even more headroom in the base car.

The flat floor makes the space useful even for three across in a pinch and there’s a drop-down armrest with (again, shallow) cupholders. There are pockets on the back of both front seats and smallish pockets in each door. The array of soft trims continues, too, and the back of the centre console features a partially adjustable air vent. Luxury spec cars get a single USB rear power outlet.

As with many Chinese cars in this segment, the generous rear seat space comes at a cost to the boot. It measures just 321 litres, which is slightly smaller than its main opponents in this category, although larger than some hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla, for example.

It has its advantages, though. The floor is two-tiered, and can offer a flat load area with the rear seats folded down, or a deeper boot in its lower position. Underneath there’s a cutaway good for charging equipment and the tyre repair kit (sorry, no spare wheel in here).

Unlike some EVs, the Aion UT doesn’t get a frunk (front boot) for additional storage.

The GAC Aion UT starts from $31,990, before on-road costs, for the entry-level Premium grade, which makes it the third-most affordable EV you can buy in Australia after the city-sized BYD Atto 1 and the entry-level version of the BYD Dolphin.

It sits closer to price-parity with the GWM Ora, but is significantly more affordable than the rear-drive MG4 and more spec-competitive top-grade BYD Dolphin.

The bigger threat to the Aion UT is that a lot of buyers will be willing to spend slightly more to get into one of the most affordable electric small SUVs, like the BYD Atto 2 or Jaecoo J5.

Still, GAC makes a solid pitch for its hatch, which offers a higher spec level than its most direct price rivals.

For example, the Aion UT is more powerful than the entry-level Dolphin and Ora while offering a higher level of interior equipment. 

Even the just-arrived front-drive MG4 Urban also starts at $31,990, but that’s for a version with significantly less driving range.

In fact, I’d go so far as to say the entry-level version of the Aion UT (the confusingly-named Premium) is probably the pick of the two variant range.

Standard equipment levels on this car include 17-inch alloy wheels, LED lighting all around, synthetic leather interior trim with heated and power adjust front seats, a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen with online connectivity and built-in nav as well as wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

There’s also an 8.88-inch digital instrument cluster, heated steering wheel and the full array of safety kit.

With the same power and battery size, this leaves only arguably unnecessary luxuries for the Luxury grade, like a wireless phone charger, ventilated driver’s seat, auto dimming rear vision mirror with auto power folding wing mirrors, a powered tailgate and of course, a panoramic sunroof (with shade!).

The Shark 6 pairs a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with two electric motors - one on each axle. On its own, the petrol engine makes 135kW/260Nm, but the hybrid system boosts total outputs to a more impressive 321kW and 650Nm.

Despite the strong numbers, braked towing capability sits at a low 2.5 tonnes, which is a full tonne less than key rivals. If you regularly haul larger caravans, horse floats or big trailers, that’s worth keeping in mind.

It’s also worth noting the Shark 6 runs an AWD system rather than a full 4WD, with no low-range gearing or diff locks. So while it’ll handle gravel roads, campsites and wet grass just fine, it’s not aimed at hardcore off-road buyers. For a deeper look at its rough-terrain performance, check out Crafty’s recent Adventure review.

The Aion UT has a front-mounted electric motor producing 150kW/210Nm. That’s plenty punchy for any hatchback at this price, and I like the way the brand hasn’t messed around with a sub-100kW motor in the base variant to push prospects towards the top-spec car.

It’s more powerful than all of its closest rivals and at the time of writing you’ll have to spend four to six thousand dollars more to get into something equivalent from BYD, Chery, Jaecoo, Leapmotor or MG.

It even has a claimed 0-100km/h sprint time as low as 7.3 seconds.

Official combined fuel use for the Shark 6 in hybrid mode is 7.9L/100km, but after over 800km of mixed driving (starting with three-quarters charge and regen braking keeping the battery hovering around 25 per cent), I saw 8.9L/100km. So it’s a touch thirstier than the claim, but you’ll unlock its best efficiency when you charge daily and make full use of the 100km pure EV range for school runs, commuting and errands.

There is a 29.58kWh BYD Blade battery paired with a Type 2 CCS port. It takes up to 7kW on AC home charging and up to 55kW on a DC fast charger, where you can expect around 30 - 80 per cent in roughly 25 minutes. There’s also vehicle-to-load capability, so you can power tools, camping gear or larger tech items when you're out and about which is very handy for family trips and weekend adventures.

The Aion UT has a 60kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack, which grants it a WLTP-certified 430km of driving range.

That’s more than its closest rivals, like the entry-level Ora Standard Range (310km), BYD Dolphin Essential (410km) or BYD Atto 2 (345km).

Claimed efficiency is 16.4kWh/100km and the car I tested returned a consumption of 14.0kWh/100km over a 130km route of mixed conditions, which isn’t bad at all.

Charging speeds are less impressive, but realistically appropriate for the relatively small battery. The peak DC charging capacity of 87kW means a charge time which the brand quotes at 24 minutes, but this is from 30-80 per cent. Expect closer to 40 minutes for a 10-80 per cent charge.

AC charging is decent, at 11kW. This should have you charging from 10-80 per cent between four and five hours.

On the road, the Shark 6 is a bit of a mixed bag. In EV or hybrid mode it’s genuinely impressive being smooth, quiet and quick off the line with a nice, immediate power delivery. But once the petrol engine fires up, things change. It becomes noticeably loud and whiny, and it can feel short on grunt, especially on hills. I wouldn’t rely on the petrol side alone if you regularly drive with heavy loads or tackle steep country roads.

Around town, the ride is comfortable and almost glides over the road, which sounds lovely, but in a big ute I prefer a bit more feedback. Out on regional roads, the Shark can start to feel less composed, particularly over big bumps or loose gravel, so it’s definitely happier in urban settings.

Visibility is mostly good thanks to the high driving position and big windows. The thick B-pillar does require a proper head-check, and parents take note: I can’t always see my son when he’s right up close to the vehicle, so extra awareness around kids is essential.

Regen braking is subtle but effective and the battery never dipped below 20 per cent and often gained charge on downhill runs. The lack of that grabby EV brake feel is also very nice.

Parking, however, is where things get entertaining and not always in a good way. With a 13.5m turning circle and at almost 5.5m long, it’s not what you’d call nimble. My mum and I genuinely had an Austin Powers three-point-turn moment in a tight ramp. It's also best to reverse into spaces to allow for the tray overhang. The saving grace? The 360-degree camera system is genuinely helpful due to its clear, wide feed.

The drive experience can be where a lot of Chinese cars fall down but I walked away less frustrated by the Aion UT.

That’s not to say it will behave as you might expect a low-slung hatchback to. The suspension, for example, is extremely soft as it maintains its original Chinese-market state-of-tune.

This makes the car waft over imperfections on city roads. And in that sense it offers supreme ride comfort in the scenarios it was designed for. However, at the extremes, like some speed bumps, or particularly deep pot holes there can be a surprisingly violent re-bound sending a thud through the cabin.

The other trade-off for soft suspension is less body control. I was surprised to find that the Aion UT holds it together mostly well on a flat country B-road, but when undulations and big dips introduce themselves, the soft suspension can be too slow to react, making the car lose confidence in higher-speed open road scenarios we’re more used to in Australia.

The steering, like many electric cars in this category, is relatively heavily electrically assisted. This makes it light and easy to adjust at low speeds for easy park and maneuverability in the confines of a city. It loses a little bit of road-feel at higher speeds but the Aion UT’s steering is far from the least connected I’ve experienced recently.

One thing it can’t be criticised for is a lack of power. With 150kW instantaneously available the Aion UT has some serious poke and while the ChaoYang tyre package is tuned more for efficiency than grip, it’s again not one of the worst I’ve driven with.

One thing which helps the whole experience along is this car’s hatchback layout. With the weight of the battery low and squat and the wheels all the way out to the edges of the frame, the Aion UT inherently handles decently compared to an electric crossover or small SUV.

Like all Chinese cars, the UT has a host of occasionally frustrating driver aids, which you can read about in the Safety section below. While I was inclined to turn some of the features off after testing them, the alerts are relatively quiet and non-invasive.

Is the UT any good to drive? It’s not bad for the segment, I was largely pleased with how it handled and the power on offer, and while it still has its annoyances, they’re not big deal-breakers. 

The MG4 rear-drive is a better allrounder, while the GWM Ora isn’t as good. I’d say it’s on par with the BYD Dolphin, but they excel in different areas. The Dolphin's a bit sharper in terms of handling but the Aion UT is more comfortable.

As with many Chinese cars the list of active safety equipment is long but that doesn’t mean it’s particularly well calibrated.

Standard gear includes the key stuff like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and adaptive cruise control. There are also rarer features for an affordable car like this including traffic sign recognition, door open warning, auto high beams and front cross-traffic alert.

On the parking front you get a 360-degree parking camera view as well as front and rear proximity sensors.

There's also an annoying driver monitoring system and one I haven’t seen much in the form of an occupant warning system, which seems to imagine you’re not wearing a seatbelt when you are.

It’s not the only safety system I found myself reaching to turn off. The lane keep assist could occasionally be a bit heavy-handed and the traffic sign alert was typically frustrating. This, sadly, is what we’ve come to expect from these types of systems from many Chinese automakers.

It’s not the most annoying system I’ve used, though, and the alerts are quiet enough and far enough apart that they aren't as intrusive as they can be in some rivals. You can also adjust the tolerance of some of the systems in the (needlessly complicated) menus to make them less annoying.

At the launch, the Aion UT was yet to be rated by ANCAP.

The BYD Shark 6 comes with a six-year/150,000km warranty, which is solid, though some rivals offer unlimited-kilometre terms and ongoing roadside assistance if you service through their dealer networks.

BYD provides a price guide for servicing rather than a fixed capped-price or pre-paid program, with average costs around $515 per service (subject to change). This method doesn't add the peace of mind its competitors do.

Finding somewhere to service your Shark 6 is fairly straightforward thanks to 46 BYD service centres across Australia, though most are concentrated in major cities. Regional owners will appreciate BYD’s partnership with select mycar Tyre and Auto service centres, which helps extend access outside metro areas.

GAC covers this electric hatch with an eight-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, while the brand’s “magazine battery 2.0” is covered by a separate eight-year and 200,000km warranty. Five years of roadside assistance is included.

The Aion UT needs to be serviced once a year or 15,000km. The service price schedule extends all the way out to 240,000km with yearly visits costing between $199 and $640 but for the life of the warranty the average yearly cost comes in at $352.

There are currently 19 GAC dealers in Australia, confined mainly to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane with a single store in Perth and an outlier in Cairns. No representation yet in Tassie, Canberra, the Northern Territory or SA.