Toyota Yaris Cross vs Suzuki Swift

What's the difference?

The Toyota Yaris Cross Urban is a city-savvy SUV that’s easy to park, nimble in traffic, and relatively fun to drive. It’s cute as a button on the outside, but the cabin doesn’t quite match the price, and some of the tech feels a little behind the times compared to rivals. The hybrid powertrain definitely earns it points but is it worth the jump in price over its rivals? A hesitant yes, because who doesn't like efficiency? But it needs a cabin upgrade to stay truly competitive in our market.

So, there you have it. A brief look at the new, sixth-gen Swift.

Better where it needs to be, the supermini survivor still remains competitively priced, with loads of new efficiency and safety tech that buyers will appreciate.

But, most of all, the Suzuki still feels, drives and rewards like the old model used to. It just does so with more sophistication.  

As inexpensive city cars continue to fade, the new Swift continues 41 years of providing a fun, affordable and dependable solution, in a vibrant and desirable package.

The Yaris Cross is genuinely adorable. It's compact enough to slip into tight city spaces, yet proportioned well enough that it never looks toy-like. Its upright stance gives it a bit of attitude, and the chunky black plastic moulding around the base actually works in its favour, adding a tough, almost adventurous edge.

The rear is one of its best angles, with crisp LED tail-lights and a clean, sculpted shape that gives it more presence than you’d expect from something this small.

Inside, though, things don’t climb to the same heights. There’s a lot of hard plastic throughout, and while the synthetic leather and cloth upholstery looks decent, it doesn't elevate the space. The tech is well positioned and the layout is tidy, making it a pleasant cabin overall but there’s an unmistakable sense of 'nice, but not quite enough,' especially given what you’re paying.

At first glance, the new one looks a lot like the old one. Short overhangs, long wheelbase, upright A-pillars, that signature 'floating' roof. This could be nothing else but a Swift.

Obviously, though, every single panel has changed, resulting in a stronger, quieter and more aerodynamic body.

Helping communicate this is a new and very definite crease line added to create a more-pronounced shoulder. The bonnet seems to be more clamshell-like and the nose is squarer, too. Indeed, everything about the overall styling seems to be more upright.

Debate is already raging in some circles. Is the new Swift too fussy? Too conservative? Has it lost the playful boldness of the proceeding version's gently-sculptured sides and hidden rear-door handles? Are the proportions slightly out now? Has the previous design integrity and oneness of vision been diluted? Does the 2017 predecessor look better?

Underneath, the platform is essentially the same, while overall dimensions are largely identical except for a 20mm stretch and 25mm roof lift. Length, width, height and wheelbase numbers 3860mm, 1735mm, 1520mm and 2450mm, respectively.

Happily, the aesthetic changes inside are likely to please rather than perplex, and even delight rather than divide opinion.

The front row is easily the best place to be, with the most comfort and creature comforts on offer. Only the driver’s seat is powered, and the controls not the most intuitive to use but both seats have decent padding and single-level heating that makes longer drives more bearable. The new centre armrest feels like an afterthought as it sits too low and tilts too far forward to be truly comfortable.

The rear row is cosy and realistically suited to two adults. Behind my driving position (I’m 168cm), there’s enough knee and head room, but the smaller door apertures may make loading child seats a bit fiddly. You do get two ISOFIX points and three top tethers, but two seats will fit best. My nine-year old loves how light the doors are to open and close, though he isn’t thrilled about the taller windowsills as they block a fair bit of the outside world for smaller passengers.

Storage is better than expected up front with a mid-size glovebox, a storage tray underneath the air-vents and climate control panel. There are two cupholders and drink bottle holders in each row and the rear also gets a single map pocket.

The 8.0-inch media display shares is straightforward to use and the touchscreen is responsive. It’s easy to connect to the wireless Apple CarPlay and it maintained a steady connection all week. The basic sound system can sound a bit tinny when you’re full-pelt on the highway but is otherwise sufficient.

You miss out on a wireless charging pad on all grade levels, which I really missed, and the only two USB-C ports in the car are up front.

Boot space depends on the drivetrain. The front-wheel-drive Urban has a decent 390L, which feels competitive. The Stonic can take 352L. The all-wheel-drive version offers less at 314L, which is smaller than the Juke (422L).

In real-world terms, groceries, school gear and my son’s extracurricular chaos all fit without complaint. You also get an adjustable boot floor, a temporary spare wheel (not always a given in a hybrid) and a powered tailgate for extra convenience.

From a packaging perspective, the latest Swift carries on from before, and that’s no bad thing. It remains exceptionally roomy as well as practical.

To that end, entry and egress are easy, there’s a sense of spaciousness thanks to deep windows, a high ceiling and lofty seating, while the latter also helps provide an agreeable driving position. Storage and ventilation are provided in abundance.

For many people, the dash redesign reflects a big change in attitude, having finally grown up and away from the previous cheap and cheerful look. Highlights include pleasing seat fabrics, interesting textures and a sense of quality craftspersonship, within a stylish and sweeping design. After 41 years, the Swift has matured gracefully.

It’s also worth pointing out the super-clear analogue instrumentation dials, supported by a digital speedo and configurable trip computer data; actual buttons for the heating and air-conditioning system and – joy of joys – a handbrake lever.

Plus, if you want to turn off the various beeps from the driver-assist systems, physical buttons are but a simple press away. No distracting sub-menu searches within fiddly touchscreens here, thanks.

Except if you want to change the volume because you’ll need to prod the screen after all. The knob is always the better option, Suzuki.

What else? The rear bench area is a little plain but surprisingly roomy for this class of light car. Probably more so than a Corolla provided back in the early 2000s, with a decent level of cushy support for two people or three at a squeeze.

Given the extra specification, even the cheapest grade is all the Swift you’ll need. A sign of a democratic car.

But keep in mind the base variant no longer comes with a driver’s seat adjuster, passenger vanity mirror and multiple USB ports found in the Plus and GLX versions, while it is alone with a clammy plastic rather than leather-sheathed steering wheel rim.

At least cargo capacity edges up, by 23 litres to 265L (VDA), and that’s just under the luggage cover, thanks to some clever repackaging of a now-lower boot floor and internal tailgate panels. Drop the rear backrests and that expands to 569L.

Note, however, that for the Swift to achieve its sensationally low kerb weight that starts from just 919kg (up around 50kg), it now uses a fiddly and frankly-inadequate tyre repair kit. Thankfully, Suzuki offers that space-saver spare, at extra cost (and mass) of course.

Still, keeping those kilos low pays high dividends when it comes to performance and economy.

So. Why are there so few affordable city-sized superminis like the Swift?

Just 10 years ago, the Swift had at least 25 rivals under $25,000. Today that’s phonetically as well as literally down "t(w)o" "three" – namely, the ageing but still-surprisingly-spry Mazda2 and intriguing all-new MG 3, as well as Australia’s sole sub-$20K new car, Kia's darling Picanto.

Many of the Class of 2014 have since morphed into pint-sized crossover hatchbacks like Suzuki’s soon-to-be-discontinued Ignis, the Hyundai Venue and Kia Stonic. And if you must, there are also the cheerless MG ZS and ancient Mitsubishi ASX biggish-small SUVs – but they’re cheapo for a reason.

Unlike the latest Swift... which, from $24,490 drive-away, is more than reasonably cheap, since it introduces some electrification tech across the whole range, while still being around the same price as the old base GL.

This now makes the new Swift Australia’s cheapest 'hybrid'.

Granted, despite wearing the Hybrid badge on every grade, it’s just a mild hybrid system, but one that provides extra electrification to usefully boost performance and economy for the all-new powertrain and revised transmissions. More on all that later.

What else? The base Swift at last gains LED lights, telescopic as well as tilt steering adjustment and important driver-assist safety like Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), along with lane-support systems, adaptive cruise control and rear parking sensors.

Also included now are keyless entry/start, a 9.0-inch touchscreen as part of a new multimedia set-up, wireless for Apple CarPlay (but not for the Android Auto), a digital radio, heated mirrors, traffic sign recognition, auto high beams and an alarm.

And there's more. The entry-level Swift Hybrid is also class unique in offering a manual gearbox. Good on you, Suzuki.

Not for you? Don't worry, because the Hybrid auto that is expected to be the bestseller starts from $26,990, drive-away. For the record, that’s only about $1000 more than the equivalent old version but with all that extra gear to boot.

But, beware, the base-model Hybrid alone lacks a few items that may or may not have been standard in the outgoing Swift, such as a driver’s seat-height adjuster, leather-wrapped steering wheel, privacy glass, alloy wheels, front passenger vanity mirror, front-seat map pockets, multiple USB charging outlets and a spare wheel (though you can pay extra for one as the wheel-well remains).

All of the above, except the missing spare, are included in the new Hybrid Plus auto grade, from $28,490 drive-away, along with heated front seats and additional driver-assist tech like a blind-spot monitor. We’ll get into more detail in the Safety section below.

Finally, there’s the Hybrid GLX auto, with its wireless phone charger, folding exterior mirrors, steering wheel paddle shifters, climate control, glossy alloys and more from $29,490, drive-away.

Sadly, the terrific old GLX 'BoosterJet' three-cylinder turbo is no more, and there might not even be a new Swift Sport to continue the GTi hot-hatch legacy.

Still, Suzuki’s managed to keep the entire range under $30K drive-away, despite big changes inside and out. Let’s check those out.

All Yaris Cross variants share the same 1.5-litre three-cylinder hybrid setup, producing 85kW of power combined and 120Nm of torque from the petrol engine. Toyota does not provide combined torque figures for its hybrid powertrains.

On paper, those numbers look a bit anaemic but in practice the hybrid system does a good job of masking the low torque. Around town, it feels livelier than you’d expect, with that electric assist giving it just enough punch to feel almost spritely off the line.

Our test car is the front-wheel-drive version, but you can opt for all-wheel drive for a couple of grand extra.

Compared with rivals, the Yaris Cross lands in an interesting middle ground. The Nissan Juke makes 84kW of power, while the Kia Stonic sits at 74kW.

And that’s really where the critique lands, because while the Yaris Cross feels zippy and eager at low speeds thanks to the hybrid boost, once you’re outside the city the torque deficit becomes harder to ignore. Overtaking and keeping up to speed aren’t the real issues - it’s more that the engine starts to whine like it’s under a bit of duress when you ask for more.

If there’s one area where Suzuki shines, that’s in making sweet little engines, and the new, chain-driven, 1197cc 1.2-litre mild hybrid three-cylinder petrol unit is no exception.

Now, on paper, 61kW at 5700rpm and 112Nm at 4500rpm may seem slightly lacking. A Mazda2 manages to make nearly 35 and 30 per cent more power and torque, respectively.

But the Swift's new 'ISG' integrated starter/generator/electric motor unit delivers an additional 2.3kW and 60Nm.

Combined with the hatchback's comparative lightness, it makes for a sufficient power-to-weight ratio of between 63 and 66kW per tonne.

Or, in other words, it provides some welcome extra low-down muscle.

Drive is naturally sent to the front wheels, via either a light-yet-positive shifting five-speed manual gearbox, or new CVT auto. Both have been heavily revised in their new roles serving the mild-hybrid powertrain.

The Urban FWD has an impressively low claimed combined fuel consumption of 3.8L/100km, and with its 36L fuel tank, you’re looking at a theoretical driving range of up to 950km, which isn't bad for an urban trawler. In real-world use, including longer highway trips and everyday city errands, I averaged 4.4L/100km, which is still very efficient.

By comparison, the Nissan Juke Ti uses 5.8L/100km with a 46L tank, while the Kia Stonic GT-Line sits at 5.4L/100km with 45L. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses 5.4L as well.

The Yaris Cross not only sips fuel but makes the most of its smaller tank, which means the hybrid powertrain wins this round.

The latest Swift’s maturity does not end with its suave cabin presentation.

Prioritising high economy and subsequently low pollution, this Euro 6d-rated three-pot hybrid powertrain promises an astonishing combined fuel-consumption average of just 3.8 litres per 100km for the manual, and slightly more for the CVT at 4.0L/100km.

The results are 78 and 80 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions, respectively, along with around 970km between refills of the meagre 37L fuel tank.

These facts somewhat ease the pain of the need for more-expensive 95 RON premium unleaded petrol instead of the regular brew. High-tech solutions do require superior fuel, after all.

With just 70km on our ultra-tight test car’s odometer, the trip computer’s 6.7L readout is likely no indicator of the frugality we’re expecting to come.

So, how are such low consumption figures attainable? Along with better aerodynamics and a low kerb weight, the latest Swift Hybrid’s ISG hybrid unit generates supplementary electricity under acceleration, to ease the engine’s reliance on petrol.

It also recharges the 12-volt lithium-ion battery that lives beneath the front passenger-seat floor off-throttle via regenerative braking.

Note that the Suzuki never drives purely on electricity.

Power delivery is crisp and punctual, and while the engine can sound strained when you push it on the open road, it rarely translates into any noticeable lag. You won’t feel deep reserves of power, but there’s enough to keep up with traffic and overtake when needed.

Ride comfort is better than expected, with suspension that soaks up smaller bumps, and it corners confidently without too much body roll. The cabin picks up a lot of road noise, and there’s an annoying electric whine at lower speeds but it's easily drowned out with music.

Steering is on the lighter side but remains responsive, making the Yaris Cross genuinely easy to drive. It would make a great first car, or a simple, fuss-free choice for an older couple.

Visibility is excellent, giving you a solid sense of the car’s dimensions which is a big help when manoeuvring and that's even before you look at the 360-degree camera feed. Add in the small 10.6m turning circle, and parking this SUV is almost effortless. If you struggle, it’s not the car’s fault.

No Swift since 2004’s new-millennium redesign has been anything less than fun to punt around. A focus on driving pleasure and superior dynamics has helped make each version a cut-above most rivals.

Losing the smooth old 1.2-litre four-cylinder engine in the name of low consumption and emissions is a noble move. But how does this translate out in the real world, especially with a Swift fan behind the wheel?

It's mostly great, actually.

Losing a cylinder results in a slightly less creamy power delivery, especially as it’s accompanied by a distinctive three-cylinder exhaust-note thrum. But that’s still in keeping with the Swift’s endearingly sporty character.

Better still, even with all the examples we tested showing barely more than delivery mileage on the odometer, there seems to be more than enough grunt to please driving enthusiasts.

While not wanting to tax engines that weren’t even run-in yet, the charming revvy eagerness and instant throttle response remains, along with a discernible extra kick when accelerating away from standstill.

Even being so new, our Swifts proved to be lively, lusty and surprisingly rapid performers. We can’t wait to test run-in examples!

The five-speed manual is deliciously well-oiled and precise, immersing the driver into the Swift experience on another level compared to the CVT auto, which still manages to impress by responding quickly and effortlessly, without feeling laggy or droney. A lot like the old version.

Suzuki is making a lot of noise over how agile yet comfortable the newcomer’s handling and ride qualities are, as a result of improved rigidity and noise-dampening measures.

The Swift’s MacPherson-style front struts and torsion beam rear suspension systems have been revised with stronger and quieter mounts for better performance, while the electric steering has been retuned for greater feel and linearity. 

The result? Even our limited time behind the wheel revealed tactile and precise steering, composed handling and extraordinary isolation from the road below for a car barely weighing 950kg (at most).

Combined with the nuanced driver-assist safety tech that rarely interrupted the fun, the latest Swift is a cheerfully animated, nimble and rewarding experience... and one that stands out all the more for evolving while so many other like-minded rivals like the Ford Fiesta have sadly fallen away.

Bravo, Suzuki. Generation Number Six remains the enthusiast driver’s choice, and a hybrid bargain to boot.

The latest, sixth-generation Swift has yet to be crash-tested by ANCAP.

Even the base Hybrid now includes driver-assist safety like AEB that includes night and day pedestrian and cyclist detection as standard, along with lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, 'Weaving Alert' (a driver-drowsiness warning prompt), rear parking sensors, traffic-sign recognition, a reverse camera, automatic high beams and adaptive cruise control.

You’ll need to go Hybrid Plus for rear-cross traffic alert and blind-spot warning tech, though.

Note that Suzuki does not supply information about the AEB and other driver-assist tech’s operating parameters.

Also fitted are six airbags (dual front, dual front side and curtain), electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake-assist.

The rear seats also contain a trio of child-seat tether anchorages, as well as an outboard pair of ISOFIX attachments.

The Yaris Cross comes with Toyota’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, extendable up to seven years if you stick to servicing at a Toyota centre. That makes it more competitive as the Nissan Juke offers a 10-year term and the Kia Stonic comes standard with seven years.

Servicing is also straightforward and affordable, thanks to Toyota’s five-year capped-price program, with each service costing just $255. Intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, while basic capped-price servicing is available, with the website showing pricing for the first five years and 100,000km averaging $391 per workshop visit.