Suzuki Baleno vs Suzuki Swift

What's the difference?

The Baleno is a disappointingly dull car from a company that makes plenty of un-dull cars. I suppose it's prudent for Suzuki to at least try to look like a grown-up, but as this car proves, there's no fun in that.

It will no doubt be dependable and if kept in metropolitan areas, will serve its owners well. But it's lacking in key safety gear, the servicing is a bit on the stiff side and the interior feels cheaper than most of its competitors.

And on top of all that, it feels really old.

The Suzuki Swift GL S Plus offers good value-for-money, strong safety, a competitive ownership package, miserly fuel economy, a surprisingly roomy interior and respectable overall refinement. That's offset somewhat by sluggish performance, a firm ride, sober interior, and a small boot (with the rear seats up). As always, the significance of these pluses and minuses depends on your specific priorities. But we reckon for a car well past mid-life it's still worthy of a spot on your small urban car short-list.

Suzuki says the Baleno's look reflects the brand's 'Liquid Flow' design language, but I'd much prefer it if they had stuck with the angular design of its other cars. Almost all of them are far better looking, or at least characterful.

The Baleno's recent facelift, which is mostly a new front bumper and a headlight tweak, was probably supposed to improve the looks but instead the car now appears to have had some fillers pumped into its cheeks.

It's not an attractive car from the front, with the grille overpowered by the lower fascia's sheer breadth. The rear and profile are fairly anonymous and to ensure its anonymity, there is little in the way of adornment. Looks basic, is basic.

Step in to the spacious-for-its-size cabin and you'll be greeted with the usual Suzuki staples of super-hard plastics, hardy carpets and tough cloth trim.

There is a little curvaceousness to the dash design but it just feels a bit half-hearted until the curves run into the centre console's alien-with-flappy-ears effect. There's nothing wrong with it but it does look dated.

Suzuki's traditionally followed its own path when it comes to design, and where other current small cars are increasingly a mix of sharp angles and geometric surfaces, the Swift's exterior is a blend of relatively soft forms and rounded intersections.

The headlights and tail-lights are large irregular shapes, and the distinctive side glass treatment tapers towards the rear, the smaller back windows ending in a vertical door handle and a narrow black graphic element which wraps around the C-pillar to the hatch window.

Note to Suzuki designers: The high-set handles may add visual interest, but they're a pain to use.

Interior styling offers a hint that despite upgrades and facelifts along the way this generation of the Swift is now five years old.

The approach is straight bat, with a multi-tiered dash design accommodating conventional analogue dials in a vaguely racy 'twin-peaked' instrument cluster, the multimedia display in the centre stack and ventilation controls underneath that.

Other age-related giveaways are the manual handbrake and uniformly grey colour palette. The only breaks being occasional flashes of faux metal trim and shiny back inserts.

It all works well from an ergonomic point-of-view but lacks inspiration and emotional impact.

Here's some excellent news - there is plenty of space in the Baleno's tiddly sub-four metre frame. The awkwardly-proportioned body has delivered good space for front and rear passengers who would be happier on more comfortable seats, but for city driving, they do just fine.

If you're up to around 180cm tall, there's enough space for you and your legs in the back and headroom is adequate.

Storage is a limited to a couple of open trays but you can put your phone in the same place as the USB port. You get two cupholders at the front and if you don't mind losing the rearmost of your storage trays, the back seat passengers can share it as a solitary cupholder. Each door has a very handy bottle holder that will secure a 1.5-litre vessel.

The boot is a good size for the segment at 355 litres to begin with and 746 with the 60/40 split fold rear seat folded down.

Measuring a bit over 3.8m nose-to-tail, and roughly 1.7m across, the Swift is perfectly proportioned for the urban environment. And with an overall height of just under 1.5m and a 2.45m wheelbase it maximises the packaging potential for passengers within such a compact footprint.

Interior accommodation is good, with plenty of space up front, and in the back. At 183cm I was able to sit behind the driver's seat set to my position with a surprising amount of head and legroom.

Three full-size adults across the rear seat would be an uncomfortably cosy arrangement, even on short trips. But a trio of up to early teenage kids will be fine.

Seating negatives amount to something of an armrest rant. Specifically, the lack of a front centre armrest, front door armrests that are unreasonably hard, and omission of a fold-down rear centre armrest.

When it comes to storage, there's a reasonably generous glove box in the front, plus bins and a bottle holder in each door, as well as two cupholders and an oddments tray in the centre console.

Those consigned to the rear have to contend with a close to bare-bones layout, with a single cupholder (located at the rear of the front centre console), a bottle holder in each door, and a single map pocket on the back of the front passenger seat.

No adjustable ventilation, again, no fold-down centre armrest, and no USB or 12-volt power outlets. In fact, the only connections available are a 12V socket, USB-A media and charging outlet and a 3.5mm 'aux-in' jack, all in the front console. The kids won't be thrilled.

Boot space is passable rather than spectacular for the class (so that's where the rear seat room comes from...) with 242 litres on offer.

As our photos show, the (admittedly big) CarsGuide pram wouldn't fit, and we could only squeeze in the small (36L) and medium (95L) suitcases from our three-piece test set without removing the cargo cover. Fold the 60/40 split-folding rear seat down and available space opens up to 556 litres.

Worth noting there aren't any tie-down hooks to secure loose loads, and there's a space-saver spare under the floor.

The Swift GL S Plus wears a sticker price of $25,990, before on-road costs, sitting at the upper edge of the 'affordable' small car market, and aiming up at the likes of Kia's Rio GT-Line ($25,590), the Mazda2 G15 GT ($26,290), and the VW Polo Life (manual - $25,250).

Worth noting the car Suzuki Australia loaned us for evaluation is a pre-Feb 2022 update example conforming to the previous Swift GL Navigator (with Safety Pack) specification. So, key upgrades arriving with that change, like a 9.0-inch media screen (up from 7.0-inch), climate control air, four-speaker audio (up from two!), adaptive cruise, and LED headlights, aren't reflected.

But assuming the presence of those features, this city-sized hatch does pretty well with some other handy boxes ticked. Aside from the safety tech covered later, the GL S Plus boasts a leather-trimmed steering wheel, keyless entry and start, sat nav, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity (plus voice control for key functions), and 16-inch alloys. All up, decent value-for-money in this part of the new car market.

You'll not need to hold on to your hat in the Baleno. The 1.4-litre naturally-aspirated four-cylinder musters up 68kW at 6000rpm and 130Nm 2000rpm earlier. It's not a lot, but at 915kg, the Baleno isn't doing too badly.

There's an old relic in the transmission department. Power reaches the front wheels via a four-speed automatic transmission. There aren't many of those left in circulation on new car forecourts.

You can't buy a Baleno with the plucky 1.0-litre turbo anymore, which is a bit of shame.

The Swift GL is powered by a 1.2-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, driving the front wheels through a continuously variable auto transmission.

Featuring dual variable valve timing to enhance performance, and two fuel injectors for each cylinder (in the name of better fuel atomisation and efficiency), the all-alloy unit produces 66kW at 6000rpm and 120Nm at 4400rpm.

Suzuki says you'll get 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle, which isn't too far off reality, our time delivering around 6.6L/100km. Which was remarkable in itself given how much throttle you have to use to move along.

Another bonus is that even though the fuel tank is just 37 litres, you won't spend half your life filling up.

Suzuki's official fuel economy number for the combined (ADR 81/02 - urban, extra-urban) cycle is 4.8L/100km, the 1.2-litre four emitting 110g/km of CO2 in the process.

Our time with the car included mainly city and suburban trips, with some freeway freeway running thrown in, and the result was a (dash-indicated) average of 5.8L/100km. Still pretty handy.

Minimum fuel recommendation is 91 RON standard unleaded (or E10), and you'll need just 37 litres of it to fill the tank. Using the official consumption figure, that translates to a range of around 640km.

Most Suzukis are fun to drive even if they're on the slow side. The Jimny bounces around like a fat puppy full of sugar, the Swift is a good laugh and the Vitara is quite handy. The Baleno fails to be any of these things, but it's not all bad news.

The first thing you'll notice is the very light steering that makes a high-pitched noise when you turn it.

The second thing you'll notice is the whine coming from the transmission or somewhere very like it, no matter how much throttle you have on. It shifts smoothly enough, though, which isn't very often given the lack of gears.

It's not often I yearn for a CVT, but that might be the better transmission for this car. Yes, I just checked outside for airborne pigs, too.

The Baleno does feel like it teeters a little on its skinny, high profile tyres. It's not a car to drive with enthusiasm, but if you're happy enough with its almost-lively off-the-mark acceleration, which then fades away rapidly, you'll be perfectly happy.

It's not very quiet, though, with plenty of noise passing through the trademark thin sheetmetal and sparingly damped shell. It's light, but you can hear why - there's not much sound-deadening to weigh it down.

On the open road the Baleno further reinforces its credentials as a city car - it wanders around on the tyres, the steering loses all its feel and the wind noise means you have to turn up the volume to either drown it out or make yourself heard.

Sure, 900kg isn't a lot of kerb weight, but 66 isn't a lot of kilowatts, and 120 isn't a lot of newton metres. In short, this little car is far from a powerhouse.

It takes a strong and persistent flex of the right ankle to get the Swift GL moving adequately, the CVT auto shuffling itself around to keep the 1.2-litre engine somewhere near its (relatively high) 4400rpm maximum torque sweet spot. Not ideal in dense, slow-moving traffic on tight streets.

If you're after more urgent acceleration in a Swift, the 1.0-litre, three-cylinder GLX Turbo is the better option. It'll hit 100km/h from rest in around 8.0 seconds while this car will take around 11 seconds. Only snag is the $29,790 (before on-road costs) price tag.

On top of the performance challenges, the ride is firm, the Swift's strut front / torsion beam rear suspension transferring a fair bit of bump and thump from our spectacularly ordinary city and suburban roads. This despite the 16-inch rims being shod with 185 width rubber boasting a normally comfort-enhancing 55-series sidewall profile.

Overall refinement is more than acceptable, though. Even while working hard, the engine remains reasonably quiet and outside noise from the urban grind is modest.

The steering delivers good road feel and the brakes (ventilated disc front / drum rear) are also nice and progressive.

No surprise, given the Swift's compact dimensions, that it's a breeze to park in tight spaces, the reversing camera remaining clear day and night.

All Swift GL variants scored a maximum five-star ANCAP score when the current-gen car launched locally in mid-2017, with the assessment updated in July 2020.

Active, crash-avoidance tech includes, AEB (urban and highway speed) with pedestrian detection, adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, 'Weaving Alert' (Suzuki's take on drowsy driver detection), blind spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, rear parking sensors, and a reversing camera.

If, despite all that, a crash is unavoidable the airbag count runs to six (front, front side, and side curtain), plus there are three top tethers for child seats/baby capsules across the rear row, with ISOFIX anchors on the two outer positions.

Suzuki has joined the mainstream market herd with a five year/unlimited kilometre warranty for private use (ie not Uber) but there isn't even a solitary year of roadside assist.

Happily, since we last drove the Baleno, service intervals on the 1.4-litre have improved to 12 months/15,000km (rather than the previous 10,000km) and the company also offers five years of capped pricing up to 90,000km.

Services come in between $239 and $499, unless you've somehow covered 90,000km inside the five year window, and then it blows out to $649. That last figure aside, you can expect to pay $1635 over five years (or $2045 if you go nuts on the mileage). It's not especially cheap.

Suzuki covers the Swift with a five year/unlimited km warranty, which is cost-of-entry now in the mainstream market. Roadside assistance is renewed annually for up to five years if the car is serviced at an authorised Suzuki dealer.

Speaking of which, service is scheduled for 12 month/15,000km intervals, with costs capped for five years/100,000km. The average annual figure over that period is $293, which is competitive in the small car class.