Renault Kadjar vs Volkswagen Tayron

What's the difference?

The Renault Kadjar Intens ticks a lot of the urban boxes. It’s small, which is good for navigating narrow city streets and parking in tight spaces, but it’s also spacious and practical. The Kadjar is fuel efficient for a four-cylinder petrol engine and it has that sophisticated French styling.

The Intens is expensive, though, and unless you absolutely have to have leather seats, a glass roof, and the Bose stereo I’d go for the mid-range Zen grade and save yourself $5K but still have all the same safety tech. That said the Intens has auto parking as standard which is a nice convenience for the city.

Safety could be better. The AEB system doesn’t have pedestrian and cyclist detection, rear cross traffic alert, or reverse emergency braking.

Finally, the dual-clutch automatic and 1.3-litre turbo-petrol engine while a fuel efficient combination, isn’t all that easy to live with and can make driving a less-than-smooth experience. The Nissan Qashqai’s combination of CVT auto and four-cylinder naturally aspirated engine is better suited to the urban jungle - something to think about there. 

Now the scores, the Kadjar Intens gets the same mark for daily driving and its urban talents – it could be smoother to drive, but there’s still lots to like. 

So, does the new Volkswagen Tayron 195TSI R-Line sink or swim? It's definitely swimming as it delivers a solid blend of features and comforts for families seeking a 'sometime' seven-seater. It's not yet on the podium as it doesn’t hit every mark. Purchase price and servicing costs may put some buyers off but it packs in a number of thoughtful, family-oriented features. Whether it will go on to become Volkswagen’s standout seven-seat offering remains to be seen, but it’s a capable, well-rounded option in the segment.

People talk about French design being good. Well if you want to see just how good take a look at the Nissan Qashqai, because the Kadjar is fundamentally the same SUV with Renault’s design spin applied.

Yep, as I mentioned about 15 seconds ago, Renault and Nissan are part of an alliance that allows them to share the same cars, but each brand has room to ‘make it their own’ with styling that delivers a very different look, inside and out.

Now, the Qashqai is not an ugly car, but I think the Kadjar is more stylish and premium looking in the same way the larger Renault Koleos SUV is gorgeous compared to the relatively straight-laced Nissan X-Trail it’s based on.

There’s no doubt the Kadjar is a Renault thanks to the giant diamond logo on the plunging grille. I like the way the front bumper rises up into the bonnet like it’s all one piece, but I’m not completely sold on the rear of the car which looks a bit like its shirt is tucked into the back of its pants, which makes no sense unless you look at the images.

Still, the tail-lights have a prestige feel and the Kadjar model name spelled out across the tailgate is a confident statement, also adopted recently by other brands such as Volkswagen (T-Cross) and Ford (Puma).  

Telling the Intens apart from the other two grades is fairly easy, it has 19-inch wheels (the others have 17-inch rims), there’s the enormous glass roof, and it also has a chrome effect on the front and rear bumpers, side skirts, and around the fog lights. It’s a more premium look.

That higher-end feel goes into the cabin as well with the Intens’ black leather upholstery and colourful ambient lighting. The touchscreen is tiny, though, and there isn’t a great deal inside that you don’t get in the entry-grade Kadjar’s cabin, which is also almost as stylish.

The Kadjar is classified as a small SUV, which means nothing really when it comes to wondering if it’s going to fit in your garage or in the tiny parking spaces we’re faced with in the city.

So, I’ve mapped it out for you. The Kadjar’s dimensions are, 4449mm long, 2058 mm across (including the wing mirrors), and 1612mm tall. 

Another interesting thing – each B-pillar is adorned with a little French flag. I’m not sure if they're a sign of Gallic national pride or to remind everybody that meets the Kadjar that Renaults are French.

Either way, you don’t see this type of thing on other cars and for many buyers the appeal of a Renault is having a car that’s not like everybody else’s.

The Tayron has a robust silhouette but avoids tipping into boxy territory. Its long wheelbase is balanced well by the overall shape and the large 20-inch alloy wheels give it a planted, purposeful stance. It’s a pleasant-looking family SUV, though it stops short of being particularly distinctive. Beyond the illuminated Volkswagen badges (which are a genuine highlight and lend the Tayron some subtle Tron-like flair) the design is fairly unassuming.

Inside, the Tayron makes its strongest impression after dark. Multiple illuminated panels with galaxy-like patterns add depth and visual interest, giving the cabin a sense of atmosphere that’s largely absent in daylight. There’s a reassuring mix of soft-touch surfaces and materials throughout. Suede-like microfleece and leather elements are used generously, contributing to a cabin that feels well made.

The black headliner is a win when you have kids but interestingly for a top-spec grade, there is no sunroof. The R-Line leather steering wheel looks the part and feels good in hand but aside from the expansive digital displays, the cabin lacks a clear focal point. A little more personality would have gone a long way toward elevating the cabin space.

The Kadjar is a big-small SUV, in that it’s longer than many in the same segment at 4.4m with a wheelbase of more than 2.6m, which means more space inside for people and their stuff.

That said, don’t expect limousine legroom, but at 191cm (6'3") tall, I can sit behind my driving position with my knees only just touching the front seat back, which is pretty darn good for a small SUV.

Making life a bit more comfortable back there, too, are directional air vents, two USB charging ports and a 12V power outlet. There are another two USB ports and a 12V up front, too.

Cabin storage is okay. The door pockets in the back are big enough for a 500ml bottle, while there are larger ones in the front, along with two cupholders and another circular hole, which looks like it’s for coins, if anybody still uses those?

The centre console bin is pretty decent in size and so too is the boot which has a cargo capacity of 408 litres with all seats up and 1478 litres with the second row folded flat.

The Tayron’s cabin hits most of the right notes for a three-row family SUV. Space is strongest in the front and middle rows, with generous head and legroom accommodating taller passengers without issue. That said, the narrow centre armrest means the driver and front passenger end up quietly competing for elbow room on longer drives.

The electrically-adjustable front seats are the most comfortable place to be, particularly over distance. With heating, ventilation, massage and strong lumbar and under-thigh support, they reinforce the sense that this is the flagship grade.

Storage up front is more mixed. The door bins and glove box are on the larger side, but the centre console leans more towards tray than box. While the ‘hideaway’ dual wireless charging pads are a clever idea, accessing them means clearing whatever you’ve placed on the shelf above. A small drawer to the right of the steering wheel is a useful touch, though, and works well for a garage remote or wallet.

The second row is firmer and more bench-like, with seat backs that don’t offer much support in corners. Heated outboard seats are a welcome inclusion, but, much like the Tiguan Allspace, there are noticeable gaps of around 12cm between the seats and the doors. While the Tayron offers three top-tether anchor points across this row, fitting three child seats side by side would be challenging.

That said, amenities in the second row are plentiful. The transmission tunnel is relatively low, foot space is generous, and there’s no shortage of features to keep younger passengers comfortable. Map and device pockets, dedicated climate controls, two USB-C ports, retractable cupholders and manual sunblinds all feature. The sunblinds, in particular, are a road-trip essential when travelling with kids or a sleeping baby. The only frustration is that the climate and seat heating controls can occasionally lock, requiring access via the front touchscreen.

The third row is kid-coded because of the access and available legroom. There’s no footwell as the seat base sits fairly close to the floor, so knees are up. There are also no amenities aside from a single cupholder, so any novelty will quickly wear off even for younger kids.

Much of the Tayron’s functionality runs through the large 15-inch multimedia display, including climate control. The screen offers clear graphics and is mostly responsive, though some lag can occur on start-up. Built-in navigation is standard, along with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. CarPlay maintained a consistent connection and pairing was straightforward.

Practicality is rounded out by a well-shaped boot. With all seats in use, there’s 345L of cargo space which is enough for school bags and a grocery run. Fold the third row and capacity expands to 850L, which is better than several key rivals. The squared-off load area makes it easy to stack gear, and it comfortably swallowed a nine-year-old’s BMX bike and scooter without needing to fold the second row, which benefits from a versatile 40/20/40 split.

All grades come with a space-saver spare tyre, which is far preferable to a repair kit, and the R-Line adds a hands-free powered tailgate. Deep side pockets flanking the height-adjustable boot floor and a 12-volt socket round out a cargo area that feels genuinely family-friendly.

A hybrid version of the Tayron is expected later this year, but for now Volkswagen is launching the model with three petrol engines across three grades. We’re family-testing the flagship 195TSI R-Line, which sits at the top of the range and offers the most power, priced at $73,490, before on-road costs.

That places it towards the upper end of its immediate rivals. The Kia Sorento GT-Line and Skoda Kodiaq RS come in more affordably, at $66,290 and $69,990, respectively, while the Toyota Kluger Grande jumps well beyond at $85,135, before on-road costs.

On paper, the Tayron doesn’t dramatically out-spec its competitors, which means its value equation doesn’t immediately leap out. Particularly as it’s also more expensive than the Tiguan Allspace it replaces, which won’t thrill some prospective buyers.

That said, there is little to want for with the R-Line, which will soften the sting. The cabin is generously appointed, with 12-way electric front seats featuring three-position memory, heating, ventilation and a massage function. Upholstery is finished in Varenna leather, paired with a mix of suede-like microfleece and synthetic leather trims. Second-row outboard seats are heated, as is the R-Line leather steering wheel and a 30-colour ambient lighting system adds a noticeable lift to the cabin at night.

Technology plays a central role, with a large 15-inch multimedia display joined by a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster and a colour head-up display. The system runs Discover Pro Max navigation and includes a voice assistant function, wireless and wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, Bluetooth connectivity and a 10-speaker Harman Kardon sound system covering AM, FM and digital radio.

Elsewhere, the R-Line includes a 360-degree camera system with a cleaning function, although image clarity is slightly underwhelming for a vehicle at this price point. Owners also receive a complimentary five-year subscription to Volkswagen’s 'GoConnect' app, which provides live vehicle status, location tracking, trip data, warning notifications and direct dealership communication.

Day-to-day practicality hasn’t been overlooked. There are manual sunshades for the second row windows, three-zone climate control, two 15W wireless charging pads, four USB-C ports, and two 12-volt sockets. A hands-free powered tailgate and a space-saver spare tyre round out a feature list that, while not segment-leading, is thorough and well considered.

While the Renault Kadjar and Nissan Qashqai are essentially the same car, they don’t share the same powertrain. The Kadjar has a smaller but more powerful engine – a 1.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder making 117kW/260Nm.

Shifting gears is a seven-speed dual-clutch auto. There’s no manual available, and all Kadjars are front-wheel drive.

Frankly, the Qashqai four cylinder with less grunt and CVT are a smoother combination. The dual-clutch auto and turbo lag means power delivery and acceleration are delayed, while low-speed gear shifts can be jerky.

For now, the R-Line sits at the top of the Tayron range and is the most powerful version available. It’s powered by a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine producing 195kW of power and 400Nm of torque, paired with a seven-speed auto transmission and all-wheel drive.

In isolation, and particularly against its key petrol-powered rivals, those figures stack up well. For everyday family duties, the combination feels suitably polished.

With a 2500kg braked trailer towing capacity, it's competitive for this segment and will be sufficient for many families towing medium-sized toys. That said, buyers coming from, or expecting, a Touareg replacement may notice the difference. The Tayron doesn’t match the larger SUV’s 3.5-tonne towing capability. And the larger capacity will be missed.

Renault says after a combination of open and urban roads the Kadjar will have used 6.3L/100km. In my own testing I measured 6.5L/100km at the fuel pump. That’s outstanding.

Some of the Tayron’s key rivals lean on mild-hybrid assistance to improve fuel efficiency, and on paper they offer an advantage in this area. By comparison, the Tayron 195TSI R-Line sticks with a conventional petrol powertrain, so its efficiency figures are largely in line with what you’d expect given its size, weight and performance.

Volkswagen claims a combined (urban/extra-urban) fuel cycle figure of 8.6L/100km for this grade. With a 58-litre fuel tank, that translates to a theoretical driving range of up to 698km. In real-world use, after a mix of longer highway driving and some urban running, I recorded an average of 9.3L/100km, which feels reasonable rather than surprising.

Efficiency is an important consideration for families, particularly in this segment and it will be interesting to see how the upcoming hybrid powertrain performs once it arrives. For now, the R-Line’s fuel consumption feels broadly consistent with its output, even if it doesn’t lead the class.

Renault’s Kadjar may be a better-looking version of Nissan’s Qashqai, but it doesn’t drive as well. This comes down to the engine and transmission Renault has gone with.

There’s turbo lag with that small four-cylinder and this delay is made more pronounced by a dual-clutch transmission that causes the vehicle to lurch during shifts.

This type of shemozzle is not uncommon, the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke behave in the same way with their similar powertrains.

There’s nothing wrong with them, it’s just that for a car that’s probably going to spend its life mainly in the city, the Kadjar won’t provide the smoothest driving experience.

The Qashqai has a CVT automatic and while these transmission aren’t as sporty feeling as a dual-clutch, they’re smooth and good for easy city driving.

The Kadjar does have a comfortable ride and good handling, so if you’re able to get used to the antics of the engine and transmission there’s more to like than not about the way this Renault drives.

The R-Line’s engine is the standout in the Tayron range. It delivers solid, usable power with enough in reserve to make overtaking straightforward, particularly at highway speeds. While it doesn’t have the same effortless surge as the larger Touareg, it performs where it matters for everyday driving.

There is an occasional shudder through the front suspension and steering when entering a roundabout or turning off on a hill. It’s brief when it occurs, but noticeable and not something you expect to feel regularly in this class.

Suspension tuning is on the firmer side, though overall ride comfort remains acceptable. The Tayron provides decent road feedback without feeling unsettled or harsh. At higher speeds the cabin can sound slightly tinny, but around town it remains quiet and composed.

Steering response is direct without being heavy. The Tayron corners confidently for a vehicle of this size, but there is some body roll, which is most apparent for passengers in the back rows.

Forward and side visibility are strong, helped by a high seating position and unobtrusive pillars. Rearward visibility becomes more limited when the third row is in use, and a digital rear-view mirror would be a worthwhile addition.

With a 12.1m turning circle, the Tayron can feel large in tighter car parks, though it’s otherwise easy enough to park. The 'Park Assist' function and 360-degree camera system helps, even if image clarity falls short of what you’d expect from a flagship grade.

The Tayron carries a fresh maximum five-star ANCAP rating from 2025, with strong results across the board - 87 per cent for adult and child protection, 83 per cent for vulnerable road users and 85 per cent for safety assist systems. Nine airbags come as standard, including side-chest protection for the front and middle rows, something often reserved for the front seats alone and side curtain airbags extend across all three rows.

The suite of driver-assistance systems is comprehensive. Features include blind-spot monitoring, lane keeping aid, lane departure alert, side door impact protection, driver attention monitoring, traffic sign recognition, side exit warning, front and rear cross-traffic alert and forward and rear collision warning with emergency braking. The emergency braking system is sensitively tuned, though, and can be triggered by minor obstacles like leaves on the road, leading to the occasional mini heart attack while parking.

Adaptive cruise control with stop-and-go functionality is reasonably well calibrated. The middle row benefits from ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points, though the third row misses out entirely. Emergency call capability is also absent.

Autonomous emergency braking covers vehicles, cyclists, motorcyclists and pedestrians and is operational from 4.0-250km/h.

The Kadjar is covered by Renault’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 30,000km and capped at $399 for the first three services, followed by $789 for the fourth then back to $399.

There’s also up to five years roadside assistance, if you service your Kadjar with Renault.

The Tayron is covered by Volkswagen's five-year/unlimited km warranty which is a shorter term than a lot of its rivals.

You can pre-purchase a three- or five-year servicing plan at $2207 or $4098, respectively, which isn’t as affordable as some rivals but does include roadside assistance. However, at the time of writing, the five-year price was set at $3550.

Servicing intervals are well spaced at every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first, with servicing available at any of VW's 118 official service centres nationwide.

The Tayron only accepts a minimum 95 RON unleaded petrol, which might sting a little with regular fill-ups.