Renault Duster vs Chery Tiggo 4

What's the difference?

The Renault Duster 4x4 Evolution (manual) is a driver’s car. Lots of fun for day-to-day duties and a real visceral experience if you like to have a few laughs on loose-dirt and gravel tracks. And it’s adequately capable for off-roading adventures. It also has more than its fair share of cheeky charm.

Obviously it’s not anywhere near the most capable off-road vehicle available. That’s not what it’s intended to be. But it’s one of the most fun to drive on- and off-road.

And for $36,490 (excluding on-road costs), you’ll still have cash enough for a set of all-terrain tyres and some accessories.

If you’re just looking for an affordable hybrid which will save you money at the pump, the Tiggo 4 will do the trick, but there are so many little things which could be better here, it’s evident you’re getting what you’re paying for.

This makes the Tiggo 4 hybrid a bit of a let down, because the other Cherys I’ve driven recently have been pleasantly surprising given their price-points, not to mention the price-gap between the Tiggo 4 and many of its rivals is nowhere near as large.

From the outside, the Duster 4x4 Evolution has that special ‘something’ that draws your eye. It’s unassuming, yet somehow eye-catching.

It’s a chunky little AWD with ‘Renault’ across the front grille and its raised stance gives the Duster a rugged presence.

Hard angles and nifty touches, such as the concealed rear door handles on the C-pillar, add to its funky exterior.

The Duster’s interior continues the minimalist theme with hard plastic surfaces everywhere – including the dash and door armrests – and black and grey cloth upholstery, all amid a neat but uncluttered layout.

The 10.1-inch multimedia touchscreen , angled slightly towards the driver, dominates up front and caps off what is an unpretentious, functional cabin.

On the outside, I think the Tiggo 4 Hybrid is pretty generic and inoffensive. It shares its 'box-on-wheels' aesthetic with cars like the outgoing Mitsubishi ASX and Hyundai Venue, which, to be fair, have been strong sellers.

It might not be an eye catcher, then, but there’s something to be said for not trying anything controversial, and this is pretty consistent across Chery’s range. In fact, compared to some brands in the market, Chery is doing a solid job of design consistency for its mainline SUVs.

Highlights on the outside include the enormous grille and contemporary LED light strip across the rear.

On the inside things also look pretty swish for this compact SUV category. The seats immediately jump out as a highlight, big and lavishly trimmed in comparatively soft synthetic stuff. The glitzy steering wheel and dual-screen layout continues from other Chery products and the dash design is tidy, if a little generic.

The interior in Evolution trim matches the Duster’s no-nonsense adventure-focussed approach. It’s spartan but user-friendly.

The front seats are manually adjustable and the cloth upholstery looks like it’s hard-wearing and likely able to cope with the utter messiness of life.

I had trouble getting my phone to work via the 10.1-inch multimedia unit, but otherwise I have few complaints about the system as it’s easy enough to operate. There’s a wireless-charging pad below the screen. There are also two USB-C charging ports up front and two for rear-seat passengers, as well as two 12-volt sockets one in the front and another in the rear cargo area.

There is a mix of physical buttons and on-screen controls to operate various in-cabin functions, such as air-con.

For storage there is a glove box, a deep centre console, two cupholders, and a small shelf for your pocket clutter.

The second-row seats are roomy enough for two adults or three teens across the row and while passengers there have access to two USB-C charging ports and air vents, there’s no fold-down centre armrest.

The rear cargo area is accessed via a manual tailgate and is claimed to offer 358 litres of cargo volume when the rear seat is in use and 1424 litres when the second-row seat is stowed away.

Payload in the Duster Evolution 4x4 is listed as 503kg. The cargo area has a light, cargo hooks and a 12V socket. This Duster has a 215/70 R16 spare stored underfloor.

I can see this car having a lot of wow factor on a dealer forecourt but up close things are less good. The software on the screens is pretty ordinary; hardly the sharpest, fastest or most logically laid-out. There’s a selection of clumsy-looking themes, and while the multimedia portion has a logical smartphone-style main menu, beneath lies an array of confusing and inconsistently-labelled sub-menus.

The digital dash could be smoother and better looking and it’s a bit confusing to use with the poorly labelled buttons on the steering wheel.

The centre console area is finished in a gloss finish, which is easy to scratch or smear with fingerprints. Up front underneath the main screen is an entirely separate dot-matrix style climate control panel with actual physical buttons. It looks a bit clunky compared to some other solutions on the market, but at least it’s clearly labelled and straightforward to use.

Somewhat infuriatingly, though, interacting with this climate panel brings up a menu on the touchscreen which you don’t need and it takes several seconds to go away. Why?

The cabin is reasonably practical from there, though. There are decent bottle holders in each front door and a further two atop the console. There’s a pass-through beneath, good for handbags and the like. There are some strange additions, like an upright holster with rubberised sides which seems to be for a phone, and behind the shifter there’s a key fob-sized cut-out, but it’s gloss finished, so it will scratch if you actually use it.

The wireless phone charger is tucked away underneath, which makes your phone hard to get at in a pinch, and easy to forget when you exit.

Ergonomically, this car is a bit strange. The seat base is very high, so for me (at 182cm tall) even with the driver’s seat set to its lowest position, my head feels close to the roof. Plus, I’m peering down on the instruments, rather than have them at a comfortable height.

However, there are soft-touch surfaces adorning the doors, which can’t be said for every car in this segment and the rear seat hasn’t been forgotten, either.

I fit pretty comfortably behind my own driving position in terms of knee and headroom and the plush seat trim continues.

There’s a nearly flat floor, so while it’s a reasonably narrow vehicle, at least someone in the centre position will have somewhere to put their feet.

On the amenity front for rear passengers, there’s a small bottle holder in each door, pockets on the backs of the front seats, a weird storage tray and USB port on the back of the centre console and a drop-down armrest with two shallow cupholders. There’s just a single adjustable air vent for rear passengers, so they’ll have to fight over who gets the airflow.

The boot surprised me. It looks tiny, but the brand claims it weighs in at 470 litres. On top of this, the floor is a strange shape because the 12-volt battery is under the floor and doesn’t quite fit level.

However, when I went to load the full three-piece CarsGuide test luggage set, I was surprised to find it fit snugly, with the tailgate able to shut without a problem. I was also impressed to find a space-saver spare wheel and not just a repair kit under the floor.

The Tiggo 4 Hybrid we’ve been driving for this review is the top-spec Ultimate, which wears a price-tag of $34,990, drive-away.

The surprising thing about this is how close it is to rivals. Yes, the Tiggo 4 Hybrid is still more affordable than most of its contemporaries, but it’s not by the same massive margin as its larger models like the Tiggo 7 PHEV ($39,990), which undercut the outgoing Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV by almost $20,000.

Instead, the Tiggo 4 Hybrid only just slips under a Toyota Yaris Cross GX hybrid ($34,790) although the margin increases considering Chery’s offer is drive-away. It also continues to look impressive compared to popular hybrid alternatives from more traditional automakers, like the exxy Honda HR-V (from $39,900) and the sightly larger Hyundai Kona (from $36,950).

The Tiggo 4’s value proposition is also complicated by how much competition there is in this small SUV space. A Haval Jolion hybrid, for example, can be had at $32,990, drive-away and is a slightly larger vehicle with a similar warranty offering, while MG’s ZS Hybrid+ can be had from $33,990, also drive-away, giving you plenty of things to think twice about.

Still, compared to those base prices for rivals, Chery is offering a top-spec and the Tiggo 4 Hybrid is pretty well equipped in this Ultimate form.

On the outside there are some expected things like 17-inch alloys and LED lighting, while on the inside the Tiggo 4 punches above its weight with things like dual 10.25-inch scregens for the multimedia and digital dash, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, synthetic leather seat trim with power adjust for the driver and heatin in the front two positions, dual-zone climate, a sunroof, ambient interior lighting, a wireless phone charger and a six-speaker stereo system.

There’s also a pretty good 360-degree view parking camera, walk away locking and auto-folding wing mirrors.

At this price, and in this segment, you generally have to spend a lot more to get this level of kit.

The Duster 4x4 Evolution has a 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with a 48V mild-hybrid system (producing 96kW at 4500rpm and 230Nm at 2250rpm) matched to a six-speed manual gearbox.

As I said earlier, a new small 4x4 SUV with off-road capability and a manual gearbox is refreshing.

This Duster has an all-wheel drive system and the little 1422kg SUV can do the 0-100km/h sprint in a claimed 11.94 seconds.

The Tiggo 4 hybrid variants pair a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a relatively large electric motor housed in a transaxle-style unit driving the front wheels. In effect, it's continuously variable without being a much-derided CVT auto.

Weirdly, Chery doesn’t state combined power figures, just separate ones for each power source, with the engine producing 72kW/120Nm and the electric motor producing 150kW/310Nm.

You’ll note the electric motor is much more powerful than the engine, which has an effect on the way this car drives.

Official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption is 5.7L/100km.

On test, we recorded 6.7L/100km but we did do a half-day of light off-roading.

This Duster 4x4 has a 55-litre fuel tank so, going by that on-test fuel figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 820km out of a full tank.

The turbocharged 1.2-litre mild-hybrid three-cylinder engine requires 95 RON premium unleaded petrol.

The whole point of this plugless hybrid set-up is fuel efficiency and on paper it’s not as good as some rivals.

The official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) economy number is 5.4L/100km, but we easily beat that claim on test with a figure of 4.5L/100km. Worth noting that average came primarily from urban and expressway driving. It seems the hybrid transmission might require significantly more combustion input in freeway scenarios, hence the higher official claim.

A 51-litre fuel tank translates to a 944km range using the official economy figure and around 1100km based on our on-test average.

My kids are learning to drive in a manual because I reckon being able to drive a manual vehicle remains an important skill to have. I only own manual cars at this point in time and it’s nice to see new cars with manual gearboxes haven’t been done away with just yet.

This all-wheel drive adventure machine is light at 1422kg and punchy, working through a turbocharged 1.2-litre mild-hybrid three-cylinder engine (producing 96kW at 4500rpm and 230Nm at 2250rpm) and a six-speed manual gearbox.

It’s sporty, with precise steering, crisp throttle response and nicely controlled ride and handling. And it’s a whole lot of fun to drive on sealed surfaces.

Throwing it around corners at (legal) speed is a barrel of laughs and driving on fast loose-dirt tracks is damn good for rally-style hilarity, all with the gruff backing track of this little AWD’s tractable petrol engine. Driving the 4345mm long, 2069mm wide and 1650mm high Duster feels like you’re punching a go-kart around a track, in a good way.

The Duster’s suspension deserves a mention here because this package, including an independent multi-link set-up at the rear, yields a firm but well-balanced overall feel.

Its tight turning circle makes it supremely easy to accomplish quick manoeuvres without fuss and it’s also a cinch to park.

Visibility from the driver’s seat is somewhat reduced through different angles to the rear and back along the vehicle’s side, but you get used to that. It doesn’t help that the camera view is muddy looking on the screen.

Those niggles aside, did I mention it’s fun to drive?

It’s not too shabby in low-speed off-road scenarios, either. The Duster is similar to Subaru’s Crosstrek and XV or the Jimny, in that this Renault’s intended use is not as a hardcore rock-crawling beast, it’s not engineered for that sort of thing.

The Duster's all-wheel drive system is well calibrated and quietly effective at detecting wheel-slip and delivering a smooth response. Driven with care, this AWD SUV is capable of off-roading at a level that will surprise some.

It has a 4x4 terrain control system with five modes – 'Auto', 'Eco', 'Mud & sand', 'Snow' and 'Off-road' – as well as a hill descent control system. None of these are engineered to turn the Duster into an off-highway mongrel but they ensure it's able to cope with mild to less-mild off-roading.

The Duster’s ground clearance (212mm) and off-road angles (31-degree approach and 36-degree departure) make it better suited to tackling off-road terrain of the light-to-moderate variety rather than door-sill deep mud holes and the like.

For reference, the Suzuki Jimny has 210mm of ground clearance and approach and departure angles of 37 and 49 degrees. The Crosstrek has 220mm of ground clearance, and approach and departure angles in the off-road-focussed Wilderness of 23.5 and 25.5 degrees.

But it’s still very capable if driven with consideration and well within the limits of its physical dimensions and off-road traction control.

Light off-roading (well-maintained gravel roads and dirt tracks in dry conditions) is fine because that’s well within the Duster’s capabilities and it results in little to no wear and tear on the vehicle.

While the Duster can handle short bursts on firm-packed sand (which I test here), sand-driving puts extra stress on any vehicle, and AWDs don’t have a lot of ground clearance, so they’re prone to bellying out on tall crests in between deeper wheel ruts on a beach.

My advice? Avoid anything beyond a well-maintained dirt track in dry weather and don’t take on any ‘4WD/ high ground clearance only' tracks, prolonged sand-driving or rock-crawling. Anything more rigorous than that and you risk damage to the vehicle’s underbody at a minimum, and mechanical damage and personal injury at worst. You’ve been warned.

The Duster’s off-road capabilities could easily be further enhanced with a set of decent light truck all-terrain tyres but, be aware, even aggressive rubber won’t turn it into a gung-ho off-roader.

For the record, it has unbraked trailer towing capacity of 750kg and braked towing capacity of 1500kg. Maximum towball download is listed as 75kg.

A bonus for Duster owners is that it can be kitted out for adventure via either Renault’s range of accessories – including all-weather floor mats, roof box, roof racks etc – or through Australia’s aftermarket industry.

The Tiggo 4 is a strange one. This hybrid one in particular has me in two minds.

My initial impression was not a good one. The high seating position makes you feel as though you’re sitting on the car rather than in it, and the overly electrically-assisted steering removes you from feeling what’s going on at the front wheels.

Even the pedal feel is wooden, with the car having to modulate the electric and combustion drive components and blended regenerative braking at arms length, leaving the driver with little in the way of feedback.

The ride isn’t one of the worst I’ve had in recent years, with an overall soft enough edge to it, but it also doesn’t feel very sophisticated, and harsher over the rear than it is in the front, giving it an unbalanced character. On top of this, our test car had a couple of intermittent rattling noises in the B-pillar (around where the belt retainer is) as well as somewhere in the rear.

Acceleration is pretty impressive at speeds under 80km/h, however, with plenty of power instantly available from the electric motor, although this has the side-effect of being able to easily overwhelm the Sailun tyres this top-spec Tiggo 4 ships on.

One thing I quite like about the Tiggo 4, however, is how smooth it is. The seemingly primarily electric drive is excellent, particularly at lower speeds where this car is at its best, surging forward largely in silence with no annoyances from a fiddly transmission.

Even the way it blends the combustion power in is seamless, even compared to a Toyota, for example, with the engine distantly buzzing away only when required.

It's impressive that unlike the MG3 and MG ZS which have similarly powerful electric motors but run out of juice and lose a bit of punch when the hybrid battery is low, the Tiggo 4 does a better job of managing its battery reserve level, making sure the strong electric power is always available. This might mean the engine idles higher and longer, but with decent sound deadening, it’s not something you notice much.

Overall the Tiggo 4 is okay to drive. The hybrid components impressed me enough, but these are tarnished by sub-par driver feedback and inputs, handling, tyres and some ergonomic issues.

The Tiggo 4 has a lot of safety kit for this segment and for such an affordable price, so much so that combustion versions have a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating (although this hybrid variant didn’t exist when it was tested).

Active equipment includes all the key stuff like auto emergency braking, lane departure warning, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise and auto high beams.

The 360-degree parking camera is a nice touch and there are seven airbags (dual front, side, curtain and centre).

Is the active stuff annoying? Yes, but you can most of it off and the car remembers your choice next time you start it, so you can turn the most egregious offenders, like lane departure warning, and speed limit assist off. 

Even when they’re on they are okay, but I found the driver monitoring to be the most annoying of the usual crop, pinging at you constantly, sometimes for reasons beyond my comprehension.

The one you can’t seem to permanently turn off is driver attention alert, which is annoying because it is this car’s most egregious offender, chiming at me for even daring to peer down at the digital dash to see how fast I’m going.

A five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty with five years of roadside assistance applies to the Duster. That's average for the mainstream market.

Servicing appointments are set at 12 months/30,000km intervals, whichever occurs soonest.

Capped price servicing applies to the first five services with a total cost calculated at $2475 for the all-wheel Duster, with an average per-service cost of $495, which is getting up there for a car in this price bracket.

Renault has more than 70 dealerships across Australia.

The Tiggo 4 Hybrid is offered with a seven-year/unlimited km warranty, seven years of roadside assist and seven years of capped price servicing with an eight year and unlimited kilometre warranty for the high-voltage battery.

The servicing is required once a year or 15,000km, with each service costing $299 for the first five years. It jumps from there, with a particularly expensive service at $736.62, dragging the yearly average for the warranty period up to $360 a year.

It’s a little pricier than Toyota, for example, but very reasonably priced compared to most.