MG Mg7 vs Nissan Juke

What's the difference?

In a world obsessed with SUVs and electric powertrains, a mid-size petrol sedan almost feels rebellious. But the MG7 kind of is. A sleek fastback with a turbocharged engine, a sporty edge and a price that makes you look twice - it’s a compelling combination. There are some drawbacks for families in efficiency and back-seat practicality but it's not a bad offering for those wanting something a bit more fun than an SUV.

The Juke is a fun little car. It looks cool, it packs most of the important features and safety equipment, but while it can be fun to drive, it’s also a little clunky around town.

It’s so frustrating, because there is a great car in there somewhere, and it would take only small tweaks and enhancements to bring it out.

The MG7 is genuinely good looking. The fastback roofline gives it a sleek silhouette, and there’s a confidence to the way it carries itself.

The blacked-out badging, quad exhaust outlets, 19-inch Michelin tyres and red brake calipers all lean into that sporty brief. It looks fast standing still. The frameless doors are a nice touch, and the retractable rear spoiler adds a bit of theatre and fun.

Inside, the cabin follows through on that upmarket intent. Deep burgundy leather and synthetic suede are used generously throughout, giving it a sumptuous feel. Although, my husband joked that he wouldn't be able to drive it during State of Origin... sorry, Queenslanders!

There’s less reliance on piano black trim, which I appreciate as it scuffs easily, and most surfaces look well-finished. The integrated headrests up front give the illusion of proper sports seats but I do wonder if the interior would pop half as well if it was finished in the optional black.

The dashboard is dominated by a wide digital display incorporating a 10.25-inch instrument cluster and a 12.3-inch media screen. The panoramic sunroof helps keep things light and airy, and while there aren’t many physical buttons or dials, which is usually a gripe of mine, the overall execution feels cohesive and premium for the price point.

Urban style is clearly what the Juke is about. It’s always been about this, but the original incarnation, while unusual, was a bit bulbous and awkward. The current version is a razor-sharp re-interpretation of the original.

Ugly duckling no more, the Juke blends the elements of Nissan’s current design language with its own unique take, in a clever way.

The roofline and bulbous face of the original car, complete with its ‘eye’ headlights are all maintained, but this time they look more contemporary with a splash of chrome and gunmetal plastic in the face, offset by gloss blacks running down the doorline.

The new light fittings look great and the curviness is also gently off-set with some sharp angles. The massive 19-inch wheels finished in a two-tone gloss black and aluminium brush keep this car looking like a concept come to life. Just don’t crash them into the curb. It would be very easy to.

The cool elements continue inside, with rotary air vents, a blend of textures, including a gloss grey for the vent claddings, with white stitching for the wheel, seat, and into the door cards, too.

There are touches of chrome about the place, and an ambient red LED light surrounding the shifter, which sits on its own little pedestal thing.

It’s quirky and punches above its weight when it comes to soft trims in the doors. Like most higher-grade Nissans the seats are pretty comfy, too, clad in a hard-wearing synthetic leather material.

But it won’t be for everyone, and it’s not without its downsides. The abundance of grey plastic down the centre console is a bit cheap, and the tech offering doesn’t match the youthful style.

The centre screen is adequate, but compared to many rivals it’s a bit small and dull, and the Juke is still missing a digital overhaul for its instrument cluster.

The black headlining, usually reserved for sportier cars, makes the cabin feel smaller than it is.

Up front is where the MG7 feels most generous. The electrically adjustable front seats are comfortable and supportive for daily driving, although extendable under-thigh support would help reduce fatigue on longer trips. You do get heating for both the seats and the steering wheel but having to dive into the media menu to activate them is annoying.

In the second row, legroom is respectable for a mid-size sedan. Headroom, however, is tighter thanks to the fastback roofline and panoramic sunroof. Tall teenagers won't feel like they can sprawl out but younger kids will be fine. The second row features two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points but two child seats will fit best. Bending down to buckle in a child will remind your back why SUVs became all the rage, but it's certainly doable.

The seats in the second row are thickly padded and comfortable, and the fold-down armrest sits at a good height to lean on. Amenities aren’t especially extensive given there’s only one grade available, but you do get a couple of cupholders, map pockets, directional air vents and two USB-C ports.

Storage in the front row is about what you’d expect for a car of this size. There’s a decent glove box, a shallow middle console, large door bins and some handy little nooks near your knee. A sunglasses holder and a dedicated phone cradle with wireless charging round things out nicely. The wireless charger can lag a little in topping up your battery, and it's quick to overheat your phone - added ventilation would be a big help here. However, there’s also a 12-volt socket and two USB-C ports if you prefer a cable.

The media system itself is responsive and largely intuitive, although the touchpad-style controls on the dash feel slightly back-to-front in use. On the plus side, it’s very easy to flick into Sport mode and open up the exhaust using the cluster controls, which adds a bit of fun to the daily drive.

The boot offers 375 litres of capacity, which is on the smaller side for the segment. Comparatively, the Sonata N Line offers 480L, the Skoda Sportline 600L and the Camry 524L. That said, it’s been perfectly usable for grocery runs and the odd road trip this week. You do need to load bulkier items further back toward the seats to work around the sloping fastback design. A powered tailgate adds convenience, and there’s a temporary spare tyre underneath, which I always prefer to a repair kit.

The Juke is a small SUV in the true sense of the word, sitting below the Qashqai which is more like a mid-sizer these days in terms of dimensions.

However, it’s quite cleverly packaged on the inside and is more useful than it first appears.

The front seats, for example, offer heaps of headroom and a surprising amount of width, and while the seats are manual, they’re pretty adjustable. I was able to find a great seating position.

There are big pockets in the doors with an integrated bottle holder suitable for even the largest bottles, although the centre console area is a bit less versatile, choosing its funky design over additional storage.

It features two good bottle holders, but a tiny armrest box and a shallow tray with one 12V socket and a USB-A outlet, as well as an auxiliary audio input under the climate controls.

On the topic of climate controls, I love the fact the Juke maintains a dedicated ventilation panel complete with buttons and dials for all the core functions. No touchscreen nonsense here.

The media screen, as mentioned, is a tad small, and falls victim to glare easily.

The stock Nissan software is a massive upgrade on the brand’s previous-generation products, but while it’s functional it’s far from the prettiest or the fastest on the market.

The back seat offers more space than you might assume, but it’s not as well thought-out as the front of the cabin. At 182cm tall I fit behind my own driving position with just enough space for my knees and just enough headroom.

There are decent bottle holders in the doors, and a further two small ones in the drop-down armrest. The backs of the front seats are clad in that synthetic leather material, which is nice, and have soft pockets, too.

The back of the front centre console offers just a single USB-A outlet and a small cubby. There are no adjustable air vents for rear passengers. It also feels a little claustrophobic back there thanks to the black trim on everything and smaller windows.

Boot capacity for the Juke is impressive for an SUV in this class, with 422 litres on offer, which is close to the volume we’d expect from something a size-bracket up, and 1305L with the second row folded down. There is a space-saver spare under the boot floor.

The Juke range kicks off from just $28,390 which gets you into a base ST and reaches to $36,890 for the top-spec Ti.

We’re driving the $34,440 (before on-road costs) ST-L which is the upper mid-grade car.

It scores concept-style 19-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch digital screen between the analog dials, a surround camera system, single-zone climate, keyless entry and push-start ignition, and LED headlights. 

The quite attractive ‘Magnetic Blue’ paint our car wears is a $700 option. For an additional $1133 you can also step up to the ST-L+ grade which adds alternate two-tone seat trim, chrome and black highlights and a 10-speaker Bose audio system.

While this ST-L grade gets the lion’s share of Juke equipment without the price-hike to the Ti (and is therefore the pick of the range) there are some notable items missing at this price.

For example, there’s no wireless phone charging, no head-up display, no fully digital instrument cluster, and no electrical adjustment for the seats. The 8.0-inch multimedia screen is starting to look a bit dated, too.

Still, it looks trendy and those massive wheels are well above the standard for a car at this size or price. So, if you’re going for style over equipment there is a choice to be made here.

Nissan also hasn’t cheaped out on safety equipment, with most active stuff coming standard, even on the base ST. More on this later.

Pricing is about line-ball with its most direct competitors. It’s a tad cheaper than some like the outgoing similarly-styled Toyota C-HR (Koba 2WD - $35,695), or slightly more expensive than others like the current equivalent Ford Puma (ST-Line - $33,190) or Mazda CX-3 (Touring SP - $34,300) although it is also ever so slightly larger than those last two by width, height, and wheelbase.

The MG7 has a 2.0L, four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine producing up to 170kW of power and 380Nm of torque. That’s pretty gusty compared to its nearest rivals, although the Sonata N Line still beats it with its 213kW/422Nm outputs. The Hyundai is more of a dedicated sports model. Still, with these outputs the MG7 manages a 0 -100km/h sprint in a swift 6.5-seconds!

Power is delivered to the front wheels and the nine-speed auto transmission punches through its gears relatively smoothly. You can also flip it into Sport mode, where gear changes become more pronounced.

Overall, the whole setup creates an engaging on-road experience without lulling you into any false pretences. The MG7 is not a racer, even though it looks like one, but it holds its own.

In the Juke’s messy engine bay lies a 1.0-litre, three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine which sends 84kW/180Nm to the front wheels.

Nissan has its own 'HR10DET' engine code for this unit but it’s actually a Renault 'H5Dt' engine as evidenced by Renault logos all over the place.

Power is communicated by a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic which has been a source of strife for this car since it arrived. This very European engine and transmission combination is one which the Juke shares with its Renault Captur cousin.

I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but I would prefer a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which Nissan uses elsewhere in its range. It would solve maybe the main issue with this car, which we’ll explore up next in the driving section of this review

The MG7 has a claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 8.0L/100km. With its 65-litre fuel tank, that equates to a theoretical driving range of up to 812km.

That places it broadly in line with the Hyundai Sonata N Line, which claims 8.1L/100km, although the Hyundai delivers stronger engine outputs. The Skoda Octavia Sportline is notably more frugal at 6.1L/100km, while the Toyota Camry SL continues to dominate the efficiency conversation with its 4.0L/100km hybrid figure.

In real-world driving, expect that 8.0L/100km claim to creep up. Even after a week consisting mostly of longer highway stretches, my trip computer was sitting at 8.6L/100km. That’s not wildly unexpected for a turbo-petrol engine, and it’s hardly alarming, but efficiency is a major consideration for families. Against hybrid rivals, it doesn’t win that particular argument.

Combined CO2 (ADR 81/02) emissions sit at 183g/km, which is comparative to the Hyundai Sonata N Line but not as low as its other rivals.

MG recommends a minimum 95 RON unleaded petrol to be used.

One of the reasons this car comes equipped with a dual-clutch automatic is to chase fuel efficiency as well as emissions output. On paper DCT autos don’t suffer the inherent losses of a traditional torque converter transmission.

The official combined cycle fuel consumption figure is 5.8L/100km. My week of driving, weighted slightly more towards freeway conditions, produced a marginally higher average of 6.8L/100km. It’s not the claim, but it’s pretty good.

This little engine requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel, and the Juke has a 46-litre fuel tank, suggesting a driving range of 793km using the official fuel consumption number.

Power delivery in the MG7 is smooth and responsive, and it doesn’t take long to feel confident with the turbo-petrol engine. For a bit of extra fun, flick it into Sport mode and open the exhaust; gear changes become more pronounced, and the engine note gets noticeably throatier. It’s not a performance sedan, but it’s definitely engaging on the road.

Handling is another highlight. The steering is responsive and firms up depending on your selected drive mode, and the low-slung stance helps the car feel surprisingly nimble in corners. That said, it’s not always surefooted when accelerating out of tight bends, which reminds you that the MG7 is sporty but not track-focused.

Visibility is adequate but not perfect. The thicker pillars, lower roofline, and relatively small windows do make the cabin feel a touch enclosed, and there’s some road noise, which is enough to remind you it’s not a luxury saloon, but it never becomes intrusive.

The MG7 feels agile in tighter spaces, and the 360-degree camera system is high-quality. Parking is straightforward, which frazzled parents will appreciate.

The Juke can be fun to drive, and I wanted to like it more, but the transmission its peppy little engine is paired with is frustrating.

Outputs of 84kW/180Nm doesn’t sound like a lot, but power isn’t the problem. The little engine has a fun turbo-surge which pairs with the Juke's light frame to make for a car which is quite athletic when you push it.

The issue is a mountain of turbo-lag conspires with the clunky dual-clutch automatic to make it far too sluggish off the line.

There’s a full second (or two, at times) to wait for any power to arrive, which simply isn’t good enough at T-junctions and roundabouts, the kind of situations a little urban SUV like this will constantly be encountering.

Nissan says the transmission software was even updated after the Juke’s launch, but it’s still not where it should be.

It has good traits, too. When you’re out on the open road, it has quick, snappy and well-defined shifts, and the engine is much better when it’s being properly pushed, too.

It has a gruff, entertaining tone, and the Juke’s light frame, firm ride, and comparatively heavy steering make it a joy to throw into some corners.

The long wheelbase for such a small SUV, paired with a decent set of tyres, also keeps it confident when its predecessor was a little clumsy.

Again, though, the reasonably hard ride, not helped by the very large wheels, isn't its best trait in an urban environment. The Juke is by no means uncomfortable, it just seems like the priorities for this little SUV aren’t in the right place.

I’ve said this before but there’s a great car in here somewhere. The Juke is fun to drive in the right environment, it’s just this environment is not where most prospective buyers will primarily be looking to use it.

What could fix this issue? A different transmission perhaps. Better yet, an e-Power hybrid powertrain.

The Juke's standard active safety features include freeway-speed auto emergency braking, lane departure warning with lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control and traffic sign recognition.

Last time I reviewed this car I complained about the way it vibrates the steering wheel when the lane keep function decides you’re going out of your lane. But having since experienced so many more invasive lane keep systems, this one seems comparatively low-key.

Elsewhere, the Juke gets the standard array of six airbags (dual front, side, and curtain) and wears a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2019 standards.

MG backs the MG7 with a seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. If you service exclusively through MG service centres, that coverage can be extended to 10 years or up to 250,000km, which makes it one of the more generous warranty offerings currently available.

At the time of this review, servicing intervals and service prices haven't been set for the MG7. It's fairly easy to secure servicing for an MG, as they have around 90 service centres nationwide at the moment.

Nissan offers the Juke with a five-year, unlimited km warranty, with five-years of roadside assist included.

It requires servicing every 12 months or 20,000km and the cost is subject to a capped price servicing program for the first six years.

This averages $651.33 annually, which is not cheap for a small SUV in this class.

However, there is also the option of a pre-paid five-year service plan which brings the annual cost over five years down to a more reasonable $429.60.

But, notably, it does not include the pricy $1521 sixth-year interval. It’s worth asking yourself how long you’ll own the car for before splurging on it.