MG Mg7 vs Citroen C4

What's the difference?

In a world obsessed with SUVs and electric powertrains, a mid-size petrol sedan almost feels rebellious. But the MG7 kind of is. A sleek fastback with a turbocharged engine, a sporty edge and a price that makes you look twice - it’s a compelling combination. There are some drawbacks for families in efficiency and back-seat practicality but it's not a bad offering for those wanting something a bit more fun than an SUV.

It’s weird, wonderful and fun, in more ways that one. I think every segment could use an oddball alternative like the C4. Citroen has successfully transformed it from a hatch to a small SUV with a difference. It’s not going to be for everyone – few Citroens are – but those who are willing to take a chance will be rewarded with a surprisingly competitive little package that stands apart from the crowd.

The MG7 is genuinely good looking. The fastback roofline gives it a sleek silhouette, and there’s a confidence to the way it carries itself.

The blacked-out badging, quad exhaust outlets, 19-inch Michelin tyres and red brake calipers all lean into that sporty brief. It looks fast standing still. The frameless doors are a nice touch, and the retractable rear spoiler adds a bit of theatre and fun.

Inside, the cabin follows through on that upmarket intent. Deep burgundy leather and synthetic suede are used generously throughout, giving it a sumptuous feel. Although, my husband joked that he wouldn't be able to drive it during State of Origin... sorry, Queenslanders!

There’s less reliance on piano black trim, which I appreciate as it scuffs easily, and most surfaces look well-finished. The integrated headrests up front give the illusion of proper sports seats but I do wonder if the interior would pop half as well if it was finished in the optional black.

The dashboard is dominated by a wide digital display incorporating a 10.25-inch instrument cluster and a 12.3-inch media screen. The panoramic sunroof helps keep things light and airy, and while there aren’t many physical buttons or dials, which is usually a gripe of mine, the overall execution feels cohesive and premium for the price point.

It’s really hard to stand out in Australia’s busy marketplace, especially in this small SUV space, where there doesn’t really seem to be as much of a design rulebook as there is in other segments.

Rooflines are wildly different, as are beltines and light profiles. While some may decry the fall of the hatchback to these more high-riding options, at least some of them are bringing fresh design ideas to the car world.

Our C4 is a great example. An SUV perhaps in profile only, it sports a slinky descending roofline, tall, contoured bonnet, a frowny-face LED profile, and characterful plastic claddings, which are a continuation of Citroen’s ‘Airbump’ elements, which gave cars like the previous-generation C4 Cactus such a unique look.

The rear is this car’s most confronting angle, with a post-modern approach to the light profile, and in reference to C4s past, a spoiler integrated into the rear tailgate.

It looks cool, contemporary, and I think is successful in its aim to blend the sporty elements from the hatch world with the sought-after high-riding elements of an SUV.

It certainly caught a few eyeballs in my time with it, and if nothing else, a bit of attention is something the Citroen brand desperately needs.

In the past you could rely on this brand to give you a funky interior, but one that sadly also came with its fair share of sub-par plastics and strange ergonomic. So I’m pleased to report that the new C4 dips into the better looking and feeling Stellantis parts catalogue for a still interesting yet more coherent experience this time around.

The modern look and feel of this car continues with interesting seat designs, a high-riding dash with a higher degree of digitization than before, and improved ergonomic features (even over some notable Peugeots). We’ll talk more about those in the practicality section, but the C4 feels as weird and different from behind the wheel as you’d hope , with an odd dash profile, a fun and minimalist steering yoke, and attention-to-detail elements, like a detail strip that runs through the door trims and across the seats.

These elements are welcome and help separate this Citroen from its Peugeot siblings. It will need this going forward, as it also now shares much of its switchgear and screens with its sister brand.

This is largely a good thing, with the 10-inch screen looking and feeling good and slotting into this car’s design nicely.

Up front is where the MG7 feels most generous. The electrically adjustable front seats are comfortable and supportive for daily driving, although extendable under-thigh support would help reduce fatigue on longer trips. You do get heating for both the seats and the steering wheel but having to dive into the media menu to activate them is annoying.

In the second row, legroom is respectable for a mid-size sedan. Headroom, however, is tighter thanks to the fastback roofline and panoramic sunroof. Tall teenagers won't feel like they can sprawl out but younger kids will be fine. The second row features two ISOFIX child seat mounts and three top-tether anchor points but two child seats will fit best. Bending down to buckle in a child will remind your back why SUVs became all the rage, but it's certainly doable.

The seats in the second row are thickly padded and comfortable, and the fold-down armrest sits at a good height to lean on. Amenities aren’t especially extensive given there’s only one grade available, but you do get a couple of cupholders, map pockets, directional air vents and two USB-C ports.

Storage in the front row is about what you’d expect for a car of this size. There’s a decent glove box, a shallow middle console, large door bins and some handy little nooks near your knee. A sunglasses holder and a dedicated phone cradle with wireless charging round things out nicely. The wireless charger can lag a little in topping up your battery, and it's quick to overheat your phone - added ventilation would be a big help here. However, there’s also a 12-volt socket and two USB-C ports if you prefer a cable.

The media system itself is responsive and largely intuitive, although the touchpad-style controls on the dash feel slightly back-to-front in use. On the plus side, it’s very easy to flick into Sport mode and open up the exhaust using the cluster controls, which adds a bit of fun to the daily drive.

The boot offers 375 litres of capacity, which is on the smaller side for the segment. Comparatively, the Sonata N Line offers 480L, the Skoda Sportline 600L and the Camry 524L. That said, it’s been perfectly usable for grocery runs and the odd road trip this week. You do need to load bulkier items further back toward the seats to work around the sloping fastback design. A powered tailgate adds convenience, and there’s a temporary spare tyre underneath, which I always prefer to a repair kit.

The C4 brings some interesting practicality elements. There are a few areas where it’s even better than the improved layouts of recent Peugeot models.

The cabin feels spacious, with the C4’s relatively long wheelbase providing ample room in both rows. Adjustability is good for the driver, although it is worth noting that the seats have an odd blend of manual adjust for sliding fore and aft, contrasted with electrical adjust for seat height and tilt.

Comfort is superb from the memory-foam stuffed and thick synthetic-leather-clad seats. I don’t know why more cars don’t adopt this approach to seat design. You sink into these seats and are left feeling like you’re floating above the ground rather than sitting on something. The feeling here is unmatched in the small SUV space.

The massage function is a wholly unnecessary addition, and with the thick seat cladding, it didn’t really add much to the experience.

The seat bases aren’t too high either, unlike some cars in the SUV class, but the dash design itself is very tall, so people shorter than my 182cm height might find extra adjustment is required to see over the bonnet.

There are large bottle holders in each door with a very small bin; dual cupholders in the centre console, and a small armrest console box.

There’s also an odd little two-tiered shelf under the climate unit, with a removable base for extra storage underneath. It seems to me that the top shelf is a missed opportunity to place a wireless charger, although connectivity is handy with the choice of USB-C or USB 2.0 to connect to the wired phone mirroring.

A big win is the presence of a full dial set for not just volume but the climate unit too. This is something the Citroen scores over some of the new Peugeots, which have moved the climate functions to the screen.

Somewhat less wonderful are the digital dash cluster and holographic head-up display. These seem to be a bit redundant in the information they display to the driver, and the digital dash has no customisation, leaving me wondering what the point of it is.

The C4 also has some interesting innovations on the front passenger side. It has an unusually large glovebox and a neat little sliding tray, which looks like something from a Bond car.

It also has a slide-out tablet holder. This odd little thing lets you securely mount a tablet to the dash to provide a multimedia solution for the front passenger, which may be good for entertaining larger kids on longer journeys. Or adults who don't want to talk to the driver. It’s a neat inclusion, but I’m not sure how many people will use it in the real world.

The back seat offers a remarkable amount of room. I’m 182cm tall and had heaps of knee room behind my own driving position. The nice seat trims continue, as does the patternwork and detailing, which is the kind of attention to detail you don’t always get from rivals.

Headroom is a little limited, but you also score dual adjustable air vents and a single USB port.

The boot comes in at a hatch-sized 380-litres (VDA). It’s a neat, square shape with no little cutaways at the sides and is just big enough to fit our full CarsGuide demo luggage set, but leaves no room to spare. The C4 features a space-saver spare wheel under the floor.

In recent memory, Citroen’s offerings (the smaller C3 hatch in particular) have decidedly missed the mark on value. It’s not enough to be a niche player in Australia anymore – we have too many brands for that - so Citroen has had to have a re-think of its pricing strategy.

The resulting C4 that launches in Australia comes in a single, highly specified trim level, at a price that is remarkably competitive for its segment.

Wearing an MSRP of $37,990, the C4 Shine is positioned to compete with rivals like the Subaru XV (2.0i-S $37,290), Toyota C-HR (Koba hybrid - $37,665), and equally funky Mazda MX-30 (G20e Touring - $36,490).

For the asking price you also get the full list of available equipment, including 18-inch alloys, full LED exterior lighting, a 10-inch multimedia touchscreen with wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, built-in navigation, a 5.5-inch digital dash cluster, a head-up display, dual-zone climate, full synthetic leather interior trim, and a top-down parking camera. This leaves only a sunroof ($1490) and metallic paint options (everything but white - $690) as available extras.

The Citroen also packs some unusual items that represent surprising value – the front seats have a massage function and are stuffed with a very nice memory foam material, while the suspension system packs a set of hydraulic dampers to iron out the ride.

While the C4 faces tough competition in the small SUV segment, I think it represents pretty solid value at the price, so long as you’re chasing a virtue like comfort over hybridisation. More on that later.

The MG7 has a 2.0L, four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine producing up to 170kW of power and 380Nm of torque. That’s pretty gusty compared to its nearest rivals, although the Sonata N Line still beats it with its 213kW/422Nm outputs. The Hyundai is more of a dedicated sports model. Still, with these outputs the MG7 manages a 0 -100km/h sprint in a swift 6.5-seconds!

Power is delivered to the front wheels and the nine-speed auto transmission punches through its gears relatively smoothly. You can also flip it into Sport mode, where gear changes become more pronounced.

Overall, the whole setup creates an engaging on-road experience without lulling you into any false pretences. The MG7 is not a racer, even though it looks like one, but it holds its own.

The C4’s single trim level has a single engine, and it’s a good one; a peppy 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo.

It appears elsewhere in the Stellantis catalogue and has been refreshed for the 2022 model year with a new turbo and other small refinements. In the C4 it produces 114kW/240Nm and drives the front wheels via an Aisin-sourced eight-speed torque converter automatic transmission.

No dual-clutches or CVTs to be found here. This sounds good to me, but is it good to drive? You’ll have to read on to find out.

The MG7 has a claimed combined fuel consumption figure of 8.0L/100km. With its 65-litre fuel tank, that equates to a theoretical driving range of up to 812km.

That places it broadly in line with the Hyundai Sonata N Line, which claims 8.1L/100km, although the Hyundai delivers stronger engine outputs. The Skoda Octavia Sportline is notably more frugal at 6.1L/100km, while the Toyota Camry SL continues to dominate the efficiency conversation with its 4.0L/100km hybrid figure.

In real-world driving, expect that 8.0L/100km claim to creep up. Even after a week consisting mostly of longer highway stretches, my trip computer was sitting at 8.6L/100km. That’s not wildly unexpected for a turbo-petrol engine, and it’s hardly alarming, but efficiency is a major consideration for families. Against hybrid rivals, it doesn’t win that particular argument.

Combined CO2 (ADR 81/02) emissions sit at 183g/km, which is comparative to the Hyundai Sonata N Line but not as low as its other rivals.

MG recommends a minimum 95 RON unleaded petrol to be used.

Despite the little turbocharged engine and the abundance of ratios in that transmission, the Citroen C4 disappointed me a little bit when it came to real-world consumption.

The official/combined consumption sounds reasonable at just 6.1L/100km, but after a week of driving in what I would consider realistic combined conditions my car returned 8.4L/100km.

While it’s not terrible in the wider context of small SUVs (a segment that is still packed with naturally aspirated 2.0-litre engines), it could be better.

The C4 also needs at least mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel and has a 50-litre fuel tank.

Power delivery in the MG7 is smooth and responsive, and it doesn’t take long to feel confident with the turbo-petrol engine. For a bit of extra fun, flick it into Sport mode and open the exhaust; gear changes become more pronounced, and the engine note gets noticeably throatier. It’s not a performance sedan, but it’s definitely engaging on the road.

Handling is another highlight. The steering is responsive and firms up depending on your selected drive mode, and the low-slung stance helps the car feel surprisingly nimble in corners. That said, it’s not always surefooted when accelerating out of tight bends, which reminds you that the MG7 is sporty but not track-focused.

Visibility is adequate but not perfect. The thicker pillars, lower roofline, and relatively small windows do make the cabin feel a touch enclosed, and there’s some road noise, which is enough to remind you it’s not a luxury saloon, but it never becomes intrusive.

The MG7 feels agile in tighter spaces, and the 360-degree camera system is high-quality. Parking is straightforward, which frazzled parents will appreciate.

Driving the C4 is an interesting experience because it approaches the road a little differently from most of its rivals.

It really leans into Citroen’s newfound comfort-focused niche with the seating and suspension. This results in an overall experience that is a bit unique in the market, and quite pleasant, too.

The ride really is quite good. It’s not a fully hydraulic system but has dual-stage dampers that essentially smooth out corrugations and much of the nasty stuff that comes into contact with the tyres.

It’s odd because you can hear the big alloys crashing about on the road, but ultimately you feel little of it in the cabin. What’s more impressive is Citroen has managed to imbue the C4 with this floating-on-the-road feeling, while maintaining enough of a ‘real’ driving position to make it feel like you’re sitting in the car and not on it.

The overall result is impressive. The comfort extends to the seats, as mentioned, which really do still feel floaty and supportive even after hours on the road. It also extends to the steering, which has a very light tune. This is a bit unsettling at first, as it feels like it has a large dead-zone in the centre, but it is also speed dependent, so once you’re cruising it regains a significant amount of feel. You can also manually bring back a bit of firmness by setting this car to its Sport drive mode, which is unusually good.

This means you can have an ease of operation in tight quarters while maintaining enough feel to make it fun to drive when you need to ask more of it. Clever.

Speaking of fun, the revised 1.2-litre three-pot is a hoot. It has a distant but entertaining gruff tone under pressure, and surges forward with just enough urgency to not leave you really wanting for power.

It’s not what I would call quick, but it has a raucous attitude paired with a well-behaved torque converter auto to make it truly entertaining. When you push it, there’s a moment of turbo lag followed by a lump of torque, which the transmission lets you ride out before decisively snapping into the next gear. I like it.

Again, it's not quick, but it punches just enough above its weight to leave you with a smile when you stick your boot in. To have that in a car otherwise so focused on comfort is an unexpected pleasure.

The dash cluster could use some work, as could visibility out of the cabin. The small aperture out the rear and tall dash line could leave some drivers feeling a bit claustrophobic. While the engine is fun to engage with, the turbo lag could potentially be a source for annoyance at times, too.

Brief negatives aside, I think the C4's drive experience really brings something unique, fun, and comfortable to the small SUV space.

There's not such a good story to tell here. While the C4 comes with today’s expected suite of active-safety items, it just fell short of a five-star ANCAP rating, scoring just four stars upon its launch.

Active items on the C4 Shine include auto emergency braking, lane-keep assist with lane-departure warning, blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control, and driver-attention alert.

Some active items are notably missing, like rear cross traffic alert, rear auto braking, and more cutting-edge items like junction alert for the AEB system.

What cost this car its five-star rating? ANCAP says the lack of a centre airbag contributed, but the C4 also fell short on protection for vulnerable road users in the event of a collision, and its AEB system also had marginal night-time performance.

MG backs the MG7 with a seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty. If you service exclusively through MG service centres, that coverage can be extended to 10 years or up to 250,000km, which makes it one of the more generous warranty offerings currently available.

At the time of this review, servicing intervals and service prices haven't been set for the MG7. It's fairly easy to secure servicing for an MG, as they have around 90 service centres nationwide at the moment.

Ownership has always been a tough topic for unusual Euros like the C4, and that seems to continue here. While Citroen offers a competitive five-year and unlimited-kilometre warranty for all its new products, it’s the service costs that will hurt the most.

While most Japanese and Korean brands are competing to really keep these numbers down, the C4’s average yearly cost, according to the provided schedule, comes in at an average of $497 for the first five years. That’s nearly double the cost of Toyota’s C-HR!

The C4 Shine will need to see a service centre once a year or every 15,000km, whichever occurs first.