Mazda CX-60 vs Zeekr 7X

What's the difference?

Have no doubts. The MY25 version of the CX-60 is the SUV that Mazda should have launched in Australia in 2023.

It fulfils the promise of its sophisticated specification, builds on the extensive dynamic abilities of previous models, and now provides a compelling – and unique – choice for medium-SUV buyers who do not need an extended seven-seater.

It may still looks a bit daggy from some angles outside, and we’d like a little bit less suspension noise on the inside, but the CX-60 should now be on Australian family-car shortlists.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

Not the most comprehensive of tests, I'm afraid. But early signs are good for the Zeekr 7X, which ticks plenty of on-paper boxes, looks sleek and fresh and feels sorted from behind the wheel.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

If you’re searching for something new in the looks department for the CX-60, you won’t find it, since this is essentially the same car as last year’s model from the outside. Except there’s a new beige colour option.

Which means the same long-bonnet/cab-backward silhouette remains, along with the corporate wing-motif grille, hunched-over styling (that looks awkward from some angles) and short rear overhangs.

Still, the overall effect remains modern, clean and distinct from the nearly-identical and very closely-related CX-70, CX-80 and CX-90 further up the Mazda food chain.

Note that the CX-60 is usefully larger than the CX-5, with the former coming in at 4740mm long, 1890mm wide, 1675mm tall and 2870mm in wheelbase length, compared to the latter’s 4575mm, 1845mm, 1680mm and 2700mm dimensions respectively.

Which, of course, elevates it from an interior point of view.

It’s a sleek-looking SUV, the 7X, and is nowhere near as boundary-pushing as its stablemate sibling, the Polestar 4, which rides on the same platform. For one, the Zeekr has a rear windscreen.

Zeekr calls it 'hidden energy' design language, which I take to mean, at least partly, that you can’t immediately tell what’s powering it. It could pass as an internal-combustion car, a hybrid, PHEV or EV; at least until you look closely.

There are light bars front and back, but sadly we miss out on what the brand calls its 'Light Curtain' - a pixel-filled bar of light that spans the entire front end. Apparently it fell victim to the ANCAP crash-test requirements and has been replaced by a black cover.

Even without it, I dig the 7X’s athletic stance. It looks good in the metal, especially finished in deep green paint.

Inside, it’s a pretty plush-feeling cabin, without being revolutionary, and the big central screen and digital dash are bright and clear. The addition of a camera to monitor back seat passengers without having to turn around is a clever touch, too.

Like the exterior, the changes for the MY25 CX-60 are pretty much under the skin, with improved noise/vibration and harshness-quelling measures to quieten things down more.

And an exhaust-sound enhancer through the audio system to liven things up if you desire.

Representing the aforementioned $10K saving over the previous entry-level Evolve, the Pure does possess less opulent trim and (nice) cloth seat fabrics, but otherwise the CX-60 does present a larger-than-usual cabin environment compared to smaller medium-sized SUVs.

But fans of big, showy screens may be underwhelmed.

The dash is elegant but somewhat old-fashioned, especially compared to, say, the latest BMW X3’s dazzling displays. It feels like a hangover from last decade’s CX-9.

Yet there’s no denying how satisfyingly easy and logical most of it is, from the super-clear, electronic instrumentation to the simple and effective climate control layout, while the iDrive-style rotary controller means less time with eyes off the road. Safe, intuitive ergonomics. Thank you, Mazda.

Additionally, there’s a quality solidness to the fit and finish that elevates the social-climbing Mazda beyond what a CX-5 could achieve.

All the essentials are also well thought out, from storage and vision out to ventilation and, not least of all, space and seat support, especially when sat on over long distances.

That also carries over to the expansive back-seat environment, with air vents, USB ports, lighting, cupholders and grab handles. The CX-60 is an SUV that a family could grow into without it feeling excessive.

Is this ‘big-medium’ or ‘small-large’ sized?

From the boot’s perspective, either fits, and is one of the reasons why you might consider stepping up to a CX-60. The floor is low, wide, flat and easy to load, as well as beautifully finished.

The 40/20/40 split fold backrests can be folded remotely via Mazda’s Karakuri function, boosting capacity from 477 litres (VDA) to 1726L, while the in-line six-cylinder models have a space-saver spare wheel underneath, leaving PHEV owners with an inadequate tyre repair kit.

The 7X stretches 4787mm in length, 1930mm in width, 1650mm in height and rides on a 2900mm wheelbase.

As is pretty typical of electric SUVs, interior space is great, especially for backseat riders. I'm 175cm and have heaps of knee and headroom behind the driver's seat set to my position.

Storage space is good, too, with a deep bin between the front seats, a pull-down divider in the back row and pull-out draws beneath the back seat which mean you can hide laptops or valuables when you lock the car.

One key quirk, though, is the location of the USB charge ports in the back, which are accessed through the pulldown seat divider. It means that, should there be three passengers in the back, you won't be charging any devices.

The boot is 539 litres of flat, wide space – though that number grows when you drop the 60/40 split-folding back row. Rear-drive models also get a 62-litre 'frunk'.

There are three ways into the 7X, with two rear-drive models and one AWD Performance completing the trilogy.

That story begins with the 7X Rear-Drive, which gets the smallest battery and lists at $57,900, before on-road costs. Next is the Long-Range at $63,900, which is also a rear-drive model but nabs a bigger battery and a longer driving range.

Finally, the Performance is $72,900, and is the only twin-motor model. It scores the same 100kWh battery as the Long Range, but significantly ups the performance, which in turn dramatically lowers the zero to 100km/h time.

Standard kit is pretty impressive across the board, with the entry-level model scoring 19-inch alloys, LED lighting all around, a powered tailgate, a glass roof (with powered shade) and ambient interior lighting.

Tech is handled buy a 16-inch central touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto and there are two 50W wireless charge pads. You also get a digital dash, tri-zone climate and a 10-speaker stereo.

The Long Range model adds a better 21-speaker stereo and a head-up display, while the flagship Performance gets trick auto-opening and closing doors (you just push a button in the pillar to open and step on the brake to close), as well as genuine Nappa leather trim, 21-inch alloys and very good adaptive air suspension.

For now, the base engine is the 209kW/450Nm G40e, a 3.3-litre turbo-petrol ‘six’ delivering the sort of healthy power figures that late-model Commodore and Falcon buyers would appreciate.

There’s also the 187kW/550Nm D50e turbo-diesel version, for extra pulling power and economy, and we’re getting into premium Euro territory here, because both offer a 48-volt, mild-hybrid system, employing a small electric motor located behind the engine to boost torque yet cut fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

Mazda says new motor control and clutch slip control software facilitates “…smoother transitions as the electric motor is activated and deactivated”. We hope so!

Last but not least, there’s the 241kW/500Nm P50e plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain, combining the familiar 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with a larger, 129kW electric motor powered by a 17.8kWh Lithium ion battery. The latter allows up to 76km of pure-electric driving, and can be recharged either by regenerative braking when driving or plugged into a Type 2 port.

All three engines use a revised eight-speed, wet multi-plate-clutch automatic transmission, still driving the rear or, as traction and/or performance needs arise, all four wheels.

Yep, this is essentially a rear-drive-biased family SUV, with a sophisticated double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up to keep everything in line.

So, what’s changed underneath compared to last year’s CX-60?

Among the modifications are stiffer dampers and softer rear springs to address ride-comfort issues with the old car; relocated front knuckle mounts; altered rear axle bushes and the removal of the rear anti-roll bar for more stable control; shorter rear bump stops for greater suspension travel; an extra joint in the steering column quells vibrations while updated software improves steering feel and electronic stability control operation. The goal is for noticeably smoother, comfier and more linear dynamics. 

Result? To find out how much better or worse Mazda’s latest mid-sized SUV is, we drove the it in a variety of conditions, from the push-and-shove of Melbourne’s bumper-to-bumper peak-hour traffic, to a series of demanding emergency-swerve and multi-speed ride and handling test manoeuvres at the legendary Lang Lang proving ground that shaped so many of our iconic Holdens.

More on that a bit later on.

The two rear-drive ZX models share the same rear motor producing 310kW and 440Nm. Not stratospheric numbers but the powertrain delivers plenty of useable, real-world grunt, with both variants reporting a zero to 100km/h time of 6.0 seconds.

The AWD Performance model really ups the grunt, though, adding a second electric motor at the front axle lifting total outputs to 475kW and 710Nm and dropping the 0-100km/h run to a crazy-brisk 3.8 seconds. It’s also the only model to ride on the very good adaptive air suspension as standard.

One area where the Mazda did not need fixing is in its fuel economy.

All of the CX-60’s powertrains are rated at Euro 5.

Officially, the G40e 3.3-litre petrol averages 7.4L/100km, on the combined cycle, and emits 174 grams per kilometre of CO2. Urban and Extra Urban numbers are 9.9L/100km and 6.0L/100km.

Fitted with a 58L petrol tank, expect an average range of around 780km. And it will run on standard 91 RON unleaded petrol to boot.

Moving on to the D50e 3.3L diesel, it manages an impressive 5.0L/100km, for a CO2 figure of 132g/km, resulting in a range average of about 1160km. Its Urban/Extra Urban figures are 5.5/4.7L/100km respectively.

And, finally, there’s the P50e 2.5L PHEV, offering a theoretical 2.1L/100km, for a CO2 figure of just 49g/km, for an unlikely range average of 2380km from its 50L tank, though on 95 RON premium unleaded brew.

Out in the real world, and mostly driven harder than a typical owner might, the trip computer in the PHEV showed low sevens, while the diesel displayed mid-eights and the petrol high nines, which aren’t too bad at all.

The cheapest 7X variant scores a 75kWh LFP battery, while the Long Range and Performance nab a 100kWh NCM unit. All have an 800V electronic architecture, allowing for mega charging speeds of up to 450kW DC charging (actually 420kW on the 100kW battery).

Now, I don’t think we have chargers capable of pushing that much juice in Australia, but even using our 350kW chargers Zeekr promises you’ll go from 10 to 80 percent charged in 16 minutes or less. AC charging is up to 22kW, too.

In terms of driving range, you can expect 480km in the rear-drive, 615km in the Long Range and 543km in the Performance, all on the WLTP cycle.

This is the acid test. Does the CX-60 drive like a Mazda should?

In the engine department, definitely.

The changes that Mazda has made to the transmission calibration means that it no longer hunts indecisively between ratios like it used to, and that results in smoother shifts as well as a more relaxed driving experience.

And that's across the range, whether we're talking about the six-cylinder diesel or petrol, or four-pot plug-in hybrid. And the latter brings the biggest surprise, because the changes made to the gearbox have resulted in a much more pleasant car around town, with no more shunting or jerky movements to contend with.

And then there's the ride, which is palpably softer than before. The suspension is significantly more pliable and comfortable as a consequence, offering better bump absorption, improved control at speed and basically just a more refined experience. We tried several of the Lang Lang Proving Ground’s rough-road tests, which the CX-60 sailed over without any of the hard jarring of the previous model, which Mazda helpfully provided for back-to-back assessments.

So, how does all that translate in everyday driving?

Well, the latest CX-60 is way more comfortable to ride in across the board, it handles and corners with greater control and linearity, seems quieter and it's just a suppler experience overall.

As there was so much that was good with the original CX-60 anyway, including muscular performance from the inline six-cylinder turbos, impressive high-speed stability and exceptional body control through fast turns, the modifications for 2025 do much to elevate an already good thing.

So, it's a win-win situation. If you are in the market for a sub-premium, mid-sized SUV with performance and space, as well as newfound comfort and sophistication, you can do a lot worse than check out the CX-60. It is that much better than before.

The 7X is very much the vehicle Zeekr has been waiting for in Australia, so expectation weighs heavy on its metallic shoulders. Happily, and not to spoil the ending, it largely lives up to those expectations with our taste test revealing an electric SUV that shines in most areas.

Our drive experience took place at one of Australia’s longest and fastest race circuits, The Bend outside Adelaide. And not in the AWD Performance version, but in the less-powerful Long Range model. Not exactly the natural environment of a circa 2.5-tonne electric SUV, then.

And while the rear-drive Zeekr is no out-and-out performance car, the 310kW and 440Nm served up from that rear-axle motor is plenty to get the 7X up and moving, with the power arriving in a steady and unbroken stream that saw us pretty easily push to 200km/h on one of the track’s lengthier straights.

I’d argue that’s more than enough grunt to satisfy most, if not all, Zeekr owners without them having to dig deep for the Performance model. But there’s no escaping the fact this is a heavy vehicle, and one inspired by efficiency, not the red mist of racing.

So, things start to drop away a bit when the lesser 7X is really pushed, with an off-putting kind of buffeting movement at speed and sometimes spongey-feeling dynamics a reminder that this is a vehicle more at home on public roads.

The AWD Performance, however, sharpens things up considerably, helped by its adaptive air suspension and all-paw grip. It feels far tighter, grippier and more composed through corners. Sadly, by the time I jumped in, my lead-footed colleagues had drained the battery to the point where I could only accelerate at 50 per cent capacity, which made the AWD slower on the straights than then RWD model, but it made up plenty of lost ground in the way it corners.

All of this is, of course, is likely to be of little relevance to any 7X customers, who are more likely to find themselves on the moon than they are the main straight of a race track, and so my opinion hasn’t changed — the AWD is faster and more technically advanced, but when you boil it down to the actual life a mid-size electric SUV will live, I think the smart money is on the Long Range AWD model.

Side note: We also did some pretty serious off-roading (again, something no owner is likely to do) in the AWD model, and I can report that the softest suspension, steering and accelerator settings add a cosseting comfort to the drive experience on rough roads, and that there is some genuine of-road capability on board.

How it drives on actual roads? For that, you’ll have to wait just a little longer. But early signs are good for Zeekr’s most important model.

The 7X wears a maximum five-star Euro NCAP assessment and I want to point out a pretty wild feature. Standard across all trims is a high-def camera in the B-pillar aimed at the rear seats. You can cover it, if you’d like, but the idea is that anyone up front can hit a button near the central screen that will pull up a high-def feed of what’s happening in the back seat. So, no more having to turn around to see what the kids are up to in the back seat.

Happily, all 7X models get the same safety suite, which includes a 360-degree camera, autonomous parking and 15 ADAS functions.

Mazda could also do a bit better with its warranty nowadays, since its five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance is decidedly average.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km, while a fixed-price service scheme is available, starting from $463 per service depending on powertrain. That’s for the petrol. The diesels start from $500 while the PHEVs commence from $435.

The Zeekr 7X is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, while the battery is covered for eight years or 160,000km. There’s five years' roadside assistance thrown in, too.

Servicing is recommended every two years or 40,000km, with what the brand describes as optional health checks in years one, three and five (the first one's on the house).

Go for all the services, including the optional ones, and you’re looking at $2415 over the first five years. Skip the optional ones, and it’s more like $1755.