Kgm Musso Ev vs Nissan Z

What's the difference?

Despite having the Musso name, this electric ute is a completely different beast which is much more lifestyle-oriented than the older and unrelated turbo-diesel Musso workhorse.

There really isn’t much competition out there right now in the electric ute space but this makes a compelling case, especially for those looking in the fleet space. It has an appealing price, adequate range, SUV-like comfort and decent payload capacity.

The Nismo turns up the wick just enough to justify its $20K premium over the brilliant regular Z.

Visual changes inside and out are one thing, but with tangible boosts in performance, handling and braking – with no detriment to ride quality or comfort – as a result of properly engineered upgrades, the RZ34 version deserves its place in Nissan’s sports car hall of fame.

Note, though, that good as it is, the Nismo is also a potent reminder of how solid a foundation the standard Z also is… especially in manual gearbox guise.

You’ll either love or hate the exterior design of this ute. I’m not the biggest fan as the front is busy and likely won’t age well.

Regardless, you can’t deny that it stands out, especially with the yellow paint of our test car.

It’s hard to call this ute a Musso as it’s very clearly an Actyon or Torres from the B-pillar forwards. It’s like a Frankenstein as the rear tub section doesn’t look like it fits the aesthetic of this car.

Between the cabin and the tub area is a large slab of body colour with a rhino emblem, which looks tacky, plus there is an oversized grab handle section which serves no purpose.

At the back I like how ‘KGM’ is prominently embossed into the tailgate as no one will know what this vehicle is, at least for now.

However, I’m not convinced by the ‘X’ motif in the rear tail-lights. Like the split front LED headlight set-up with the full-width light bar, it looks too over-the-top for this kind of vehicle.

Inside, it's virtually identical to the Actyon and Torres.

While I like the look of the hexagonal steering wheel and the wraparound screen set-up combining the digital instrument cluster and touchscreen multimedia system, the copper dashboard trim looks out of place in a work-oriented type of vehicle. Good thing this is more of a lifestyle ute than something like a HiLux.

Pair this with the large amounts of glossy piano black around the gear selector and the window switches on the door cards, it’s a recipe for fingerprints, smudges and scratches.

Reinterpreting a classic via retro styling isn’t always successful – hello, 2001 Ford Thunderbird ­– but what Nissan has achieved with the RZ34, given it’s a pastiche of several Z greatest hits from the ‘70s, ‘80s, ‘90s and today, is truly masterful design.

Take the cab-backward silhouette, long nose and short wheelbase; it somehow manages to deftly capture the spirit of previous Z generations, without looking like a bad caricature.

Points especially go to the stunning nose and tail treatments that evoke both the ‘70s 240/260/280 as well as the sadly long-forgotten Mid-4 II concept car of 1987.

Slightly longer than the regular model, the Nismo’s nose is meant to evoke the early ‘70s Japan domestic market Fairlady ZG, with the G denoting “Grand Nose”. Fun fact: Fairlady first appeared on the 1960 Datsun roadster as deference to the Broadway musical (and later Audrey Hepburn film, presumably) ‘My Fair Lady’.

Anyway, besides scraping speed humps and driveways, the Nismo’s elongated front bumper promotes improved engine cooling and better aero flow, as do the side sills, larger wraparound three-piece spoiler and redesigned rear bumper/diffuser. The wider-yet-lighter back wheels are 10mm wider. And a glossy red stripe runs along the underside like Anna Nicole Smith’s lipstick.

Does it all look better than the simpler, purer regular Z? No. But they perform better. And isn’t that the point of a Nismo?

You sit up high in the Musso EV’s driver’s seat, allowing for a clear and commanding view of the road ahead. This is something that buyers of these kinds of vehicles seek as it provides more confidence behind the wheel.

While the hexagonal steering wheel looks cool, it can take a while to get your head around it, especially when turning quickly. Thankfully there are plenty of physical buttons on the wheel for key functions, so it doesn’t entirely reinvent the wheel (pardon the pun…)

Ahead of the driver is a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster which looks clear and bright. You can cycle through a range of informative pages and while this is good, I’d love to see more customisation and configurability.

The same can be said for the central touchscreen multimedia system. It’s a rather basic system, but that’s not a bad thing because it also means that it’s easy to use. Frustratingly however, the screen takes a while to boot up when you start the ute.

Even though the touchscreen is basic, the majority of owners will likely be using smartphone mirroring for the majority of their time behind the wheel. It’s for this reason that it’s disappointing there’s only the wired form of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto available.

On the flip side though, the wired connection is flawless and it actually charges your phone rather than overheating it like some wireless chargers do.

I’d love to see some more physical switchgear and buttons around the screen because you’re forced to use it for a number of key functions, like the climate control and volume.

Up front the Musso EV is fairly practical. There are two cupholders, plenty of phone slots, a large open section under the centre console, as well as dual bottle holders in the doors.

Moving to the second row you can tell this is a ute that’s based on an SUV. There’s much more space and thought put into the second-row comfort.

At a leggy 182cm I have plenty of room behind my own driving position. In the default position it’s a comfortable spot to be, however you can recline the backrest even further, although you sacrifice legroom as a result. You don’t get features like this in every ute.

In terms of second-row amenities there are two USB-C ports and air vents on the back of the centre console, a fold-down armrest with cupholders, as well as lots of seat-back pockets and bottle holders in the doors.

The tub of the Musso EV is where things get interesting. There’s a damped tailgate with two gas struts that allows for effortless opening and closing.

Once the tailgate is open, the space is decent but not standout for a dual-cab ute. The tub area measures in at 1345mm long, 1515mm wide (1100mm between the arches) and 510mmmm tall. This notably means a standard Australia pallet is a bit too wide for the tub.

Payload in the 2WD is up to 905kg which isn’t too bad for a dual-cab ute, however it drops to 805kg in the AWD.

Towing capacity is where this electric ute suffers the most. It has a braked towing capacity of only 1800kg, which is down considerably over the benchmark 3500kg many of its top-selling rivals can do. There’s also only a maximum towball down load of 180kg, which is limiting.

While this isn’t great, electric utes typically aren’t the most efficient for towing rigs. As a result this limits the Musso EV to more light-duty and lifestyle applications.

Disappointingly there’s no spare wheel at all in this ute. Instead you have to rely on a tyre repair kit which isn’t helpful if you have a proper puncture and not a slow leak.

So, just as the exterior is an anthology of past Z car stylings, the same also applies inside.

A mishmash of new and old as well, they also marry together harmoniously – after you’ve bent and contorted yourself inside nice and snug, on the racy yet not-too-unforgiving set of Recaro bucket seats.

The Z’s signature sloping roof and rising window line; a trio of dials that have been a hallmark of the series since the 240Z, a thin three-spoke steering wheel; a physical hand brake and a pair of old-school seat base angle adjuster knobs just like in sports cars from 20 years ago betray the Nissan’s ageing DNA.

But they set the mood, like hearing a favourite old track, though one remixed by a contemporary DJ to a modern beat.

Which means that you’ll be able to view whichever artist you like through the 8.0-inch touchscreen, either via Bluetooth audio streaming, Spotify or some such app.

Easy to decipher and simple to navigate (though no imbedded GPS is fitted), the Z’s dashboard also offers the essential surround-view parking camera (given how limited vision is as you’re sat so low with not much glass to peer out through), amongst a host of vehicle functions. You’re also privy to extremely useful blind-spot alert thoughtfully placed inside the car by the mirror mounts, four cupholders if you count the door-sited ones and surprisingly generous storage. Practicality, thy name is Fairlady.

For lightness and sensible packaging, we understand why Nissan’s sports coupe is strictly a two-seater proposition – and certainly a roomy enough one for the lucky pair at that.

However, it’s a shame Nissan doesn’t offer a 2+2-seater option in the form of a pair of occasional jump seats behind, as per the old Datsun days, as there seems to be just enough space for smaller folk – though as a pair of shelves, that area did prove very useful during our week with the Nismo.

Issues? Along with a sheer lack of grace entering and exiting the Z, poor overall vision and 350Z-era switchgear that are now old enough to drive themselves, finding the right driving position eluded this particular 178cm tester. The seats do a great job keeping you firmly fixed in place, and of course the wheel tilts and telescopes, but those pair of knobs were forever being twirled and fiddled with.

Oh, and simultaneously unlocking and opening the doors was also confounding, due to exterior door handles and pressure sensor not designed for Homo Sapien hands.

Further back, and as in the two previous generations Zeds, a brace bisects the luggage area. Rated at 241 litres VDA, it is wide and flat but a wee bit shallow. At least it adds another level of practicality and is big enough for those weekends away.

There’s no cover (though seeing what’s inside isn’t easy) and no spare wheel of any size is fitted.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the Nismo…

Nismo is short for Nissan Motorsport. It’s like what AMG means to Mercedes or HSV was to Holden. Which means, of course, that Australians love this sort of thing.

Last year, as limited editions, the first 100 Z Nismos sold out in under an hour, according to Nissan. Now it’s back more permanently, still from $94,000 before on-road costs, but without quite the exclusivity.

But, don’t worry. You still get the Nismo body kit and leather/Alcantara-clad cabin treatments, stronger performance and track-focused chassis upgrades, which include extra bracing, sharper steering, beefier suspension, bigger brakes and GT-R-spec wider wheels, compared to the regular Z. More on the engineering changes later on.

There are also Recaro sports seats, Nismo-branded digital instrumentation and steering wheel, additional drive modes and red trim highlights.

These come above the regular Z items like keyless entry/start, an 8.0-inch touchscreen, surround-view reverse camera, (wired-only) Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, Bluetooth connectivity, an eight-speaker Bose premium audio, active noise cancellation tech, dual-zone climate control, artificially amplified exhaust note and wider-yet-lighter 19-inch alloy wheels.

Note, however, that going Recaros means ditching the regular Z’s seat heating and electric adjustment including lumbar support. And there’s no spare wheel in either grade… just a tyre-repair kit. Boo.

For your $100K-driveaway, from an equipment perspective anyway, the Nismo does stretch the value argument almost to breaking point, so it’s a good thing that the Z still looks so good. And there’s lots of beautiful engineering underneath that pretty skin too.

Two-wheel-drive versions of the Musso EV are powered by a single, front-mounted electric motor producing 152kW and 339Nm. Yes, that makes this ute front-wheel drive.

It’s worth noting this is the exact same set-up as the KGM Torres EVX which has also just launched in Australia.

The all-wheel-drive version adds a second electric motor to the rear axle, bumping up total system outputs to 266kW and 630Nm.

Nissan sure knows how to make a great six-cylinder engine.

The Nismo’s internal combustion engine in question is the VR30DDTT – a twin-turbo V6 making four per cent more power and around 10 per cent more torque compared to the one found in the regular Z.

Power jumps 11kW and torque a handier 45Nm to 309kW @ 6400rpm and 520Nm between 2000rpm and 5200rpm respectively, providing extra punch as well as a slightly superior power-to-weight ratio of around 184kW per tonne.

That’s up 2kW/tonne, despite the Nismo gaining around 50 kilos, to 1680kg.

This has been possible thanks to extra turbo boost, revised ignition timing, improved cooling systems and updated engine management software.

Driving the rear wheels is a Mercedes-Benz based nine-speed torque-converter auto. Upgraded and retuned for track use, it includes a Sport+ mode providing speedier shift responses. Aided by the new launch control function, we managed a tidy 4.5 seconds from standstill to 100km/h.

Sadly, though, there’s no manual option as per the regular Z.

What else is unique here? Underneath, the platform might date all the way back to the 350Z of 2003, but Nismo has really worked some of its magic.

Along with the retuned dampers, everything else has been stiffened up – including the anti-roll bars, springs, bushes and even the steering rack mounts – to help deliver more controlled and linear steering. There’s extra underfloor bracing at the front, centre and rear of the car, thicker brake rotors and model-specific Dunlop SP Sport Maxx GT600 tyres that are wider at the back, on gloss-black RAYS alloys.

Continuing to use a double-wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension set-up, the Z’s front/rear weight distribution is 56/44 front/rear.

Now, the Nismo was our favourite version of the previous 370Z by some margin. How does it all square up in RZ34 guise?

All KGM Musso EVs have a BYD-sourced 80.6kWh lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) battery.

It allows for up to 420km of claimed range in the 2WD and up to 380km of claimed range in the AWD, both according to WLTP testing.

The official energy consumption is 23kWh/100m in the 2WD and 26kWh/100km in the AWD. However, in our largely unladen urban testing of the 2WD we saw an average of 20kWh/100km, which is fairly decent for a larger EV, but not outstanding.

Using this, the Musso EV 2WD has a theoretical range of 403km.

The Type 2 CCS combination charge port is on the passenger-side front wheel arch, which is great because it’s kerbside.

Maximum DC charging is 120kW, allowing for a quick charge from 10 to 80 per cent in 36 minutes, whereas maximum AC charging is 10.5kW, allowing for a 0-100 per cent charge in 10.5 hours.

Vehicle-to-load (V2L) is available through the use of an accessory which plugs into the charge port. This allows you to use the ute’s battery to power household appliances, among other things.

Not surprisingly, the Z Nismo needs to drink from the 98 RON premium unleaded petrol fountain.

Nissan reckons owners should expect to average 10.4L/100km (for 242 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions) on the combined cycle (and 15.0 and 7.7 L/100km for the urban and extra-urban ratings respectively.

This figure is almost half a litre worse than the non-Nismo Z’s 9.8L/100km result, but still substantially better than the six-speed manual base grade’s 10.8L, despite the latter being some 33kg lighter.

With a sizeable 62L tank, you might be able to average just under 600km between refills.

For the record, we achieved 11.9 litres per 100km in a mix of urban, freeway and performance driving which is not too bad at all given how often we fanged this thing.

As previously mentioned, the Musso EV we tested is a front-wheel drive. Its electric motor doesn’t have the highest outputs, although like all electric motors, peak torque comes on tap from a standstill.

In everyday traffic the acceleration is decent, yet does not stand out when unladen. Load the ute up with stuff in the tub or hook a trailer on the back and it might struggle. Thankfully if you’re after more oomph there’s the all-wheel drive.

There are two drive modes available – Eco and Sport. The former dramatically nerfs initial acceleration to make progression feel naturally tapered and to ensure there’s no front-wheel slip, but as a result it can feel a little sluggish. The latter however gives you everything and can create some light front-tyre spin if you’re too eager with the throttle.

You’re able to select from a number of different regenerative braking modes which feeds kinetic energy back into the battery pack. None of them offer a one-pedal driving mode, meaning you’ll still need to use the brake pedal to come to a complete stop.

This mimics the braking experience of a hybrid vehicle, which likely feels more comfortable and natural for drivers of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles.

Once you get your head around the hexagonal steering wheel, the steering feel itself is on the lighter side, but it still feels direct. As a result, it’s fun to chuck this ute around.

However, you can’t escape just how big this ute is, especially when parking and doing three-point turns. It measures almost 5.2m long, which is slightly shorter than a Ranger but still not compact.

Unlike many traditional dual-cab utes, this electric ute is based on a monocoque chassis, rather than a body-on-frame chassis. Additionally, the rear suspension is a multi-link set-up rather than a leaf spring set-up.

As a result, this makes the driving experience more like an SUV that prioritises passenger comfort than a ute that prioritises outright payload and towing capacity.

Around town the ride is supple but still has a firm edge, especially over the rear, even when unladen.

Smaller-than-average 17-inch alloy wheels wrapped in chunky tyres with thick sidewalls smooth out some bigger bumps.

A nifty feature this ute has is self-leveling rear shock absorbers. It’s able to pump up the rear end when you’ve got a heavy load in the tub, or if you're towing a trailer, in order to create a flat ride height. This is great as you won’t be dazzling oncoming cars with your headlights.

From a noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) standpoint, this ute is largely quiet around town. Despite this, there’s an annoying pedestrian warning sound that plays under 33km/h and can intrude into the cabin.

At higher speeds there is a fair bit of road noise which is amplified by the lack of ambient engine noise. There can also be occasional wind noise buffeting from the bonnet flourishes.

Nissan does plenty of things really well, and the Nismo is no exception.

Firing up the VR30DDTT 3.0-litre twin-turbo V6 is also a reminder of how brilliant the brand’s six-cylinder engines are. They tingle all the right sensory areas, starting with the baritone rumble at idle.

What a portent of what’s to come!

Nismo’s massaging of the engine, combined with upgraded clutch packs and a retune of the nine-speed auto’s software, results in stronger, hungrier and angrier acceleration, no matter which of the three driving modes you’ve selected. Even in Normal, the Nissan leaps off the line. In Sport, its appetite for speed is palpable. In Sport+, this thing is eating up the tarmac. Somehow, in an EV era where 4.5s to 100 is ho-hum, the (electronically enhanced but who cares) guttural exhaust bellow seems to amplify the action and thrills.

And spills. For five of our seven days together, the heavens poured. Now, in Normal mode, the Nismo was as benign and controlled as you’d hope in wet conditions, the driver-assist tech metering out just enough torque and braking to seamlessly keep the car humming along. Ever-present but always nuanced, they’ll help make your commute a safer and more relaxing one.

Selecting Sport loosened things up markedly, with the driver needing to be ready to counteract with steering, seating and throttle, though still with a safety net to keep the car from going totally out of whack; Sport+, meanwhile, is not for amateurs or the distracted. This is serious, tail-wagging waywardness that should only be fully explored with experience and care.

Later in the week, Launch Mode in Sport+ on cold but dry bitumen also requires super concentration, as we discovered attempting to extract the fastest acceleration time. Sideways in a straight line at 100km/h-plus is not for the faint hearted.

Beyond all-out performance and drama, the Nismo soars with weighty yet linear and precise steering, resulting in satisfying, hunkered-down handling that is the hallmark of a great sports car. Really tight turns can be taken at impressive speeds, but there’s about 1.7 tonne of muscle to manipulate, so the real fun can be found blasting along a snaking set of more open corners, where the Z’s inherent thrust, poise and grip come into play, all to the symphony of that bi-turbo V6.

That the suspension can feel both firm and supple at the same time is another arrow in the Nismo’s bow.

Nissan isn’t pretending this is anything but a rousing and rapid grand tourer with track aspirations, so the fact there’s also comfort and sophistication to be enjoyed just shows the sheer bandwidth of this particular Z.

Downsides? There’s always a wall of sound, be it mechanical or noise intrusion from the rubber and/or bitumen. The Nismo is rarely quiet. The extended front spoiler seems to summon up speed humps and bumps you never knew existed. The adaptive cruise control’s inability to resume in heavy stop/start traffic betrays this car’s 350Z-era tech. And the lack of a manual transmission, we reckon, is a missed opportunity for an even greater degree of interactive sports car driving.

Still, the Nismo delivers exactly what the brand promises, and continues to improve a firm favourite for speed and drama.

But the gap between Nismo and regular model is smaller than the one that existed in the preceding 370Z, which means that – if $100K driveaway is too steep – you’re already driving something elevated in the standard Z. Particularly if you yearn for a manual.

It’s all good.

There is no Euro NCAP or ANCAP crash-test rating for the Nissan Z Nismo

Standard safety features include AEB with pedestrian detection (though no operating parameters could be found about this system), 'Predictive Forward Collision Warning', lane departure warning, blind spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, high beam assist, tyre pressure monitoring sensor, traffic sign recognition and adaptive cruise control with full-stop (but no resume) functionality.

What’s missing? There is no active lane-keep assist tech to nudge you into line, and you won't find parking sensors nor a front-centre airbag.

But the Z does have dual frontal, side chest and head-protecting airbags, a surround-view camera, anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control, traction control, hill-start assist, front and rear parking sensors, LED headlights with light sensitivity and rain-detecting wipers.

There is also a child seat tether point on the passenger seat, but the Nismo ditches the other Z’s ISOFIX alternative.

The Musso EV is covered by a seven-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty as standard, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered by a 10-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty.

KGM is yet to confirm servicing intervals or pricing.

There are 66 KGM dealers and service centres around Australia. The majority are spread over the eastern seaboard, however, there is generous coverage in many regional areas.

Your wallet’s pretty secure as well.

Like all Zs, the Nismo is subject to a warranty period of five years with unlimited kilometres, while service intervals are fixed at every 12 months or 10,000km – whichever occurs first. There is also five years of roadside assistance.

Nissan also provides pre-paid maintenance plans that can save up to $245 over three years, as well as capped-price servicing. At the time of publishing, the capped-price service appointments cost between $347 and $950 depending on the year of ownership.