Jaecoo J7 vs Nissan Navara

What's the difference?

The Jaecoo J7 SHS Track enters the medium SUV segment with a sharp drive-away price and generous equipment list. The ongoing ownership benefits add strong value but the on-road driving experience needs some finessing and the cabin doesn't quite hit every mark for practicality. Although it's ‘on track’ to make waves in this corner of the market, it hasn't yet carved out an iron-clad niche for itself. It's worth a look but it's not class-leading.

While it won’t appeal on the value front as much as its Mitsubishi Triton engineering twin, the Navara’s tweaks from Premcar make it a more comfortable and livable thing. 

The extra cost is worth it for how much better it is on the road, plus you get more features, regardless.

Whether the changes to the Navara are sexy enough to get people in the dealership door is another question, but anyone who takes this over a Triton won’t be disappointed.

If it's for work, the SL or ST will do. If it's doubling as a family car, the Pro-4X is worth the outlay.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The J7 is, in essence, a scaled-up version of its smaller sibling, the J5 - a car my family affectionately dubbed the “Temu Range Rover” during our week with it. The resemblance remains.

The squared-off proportions, upright grille and slim lighting signatures lean heavily into that premium off-roader aesthetic, and there’s no doubt the look will appeal to buyers chasing presence without the associated price tag.

Compared to the J5, the J7 carries a touch more personality. 

There’s a small racing-flag accent panel along the flanks, flush-fitting door handles and a set of 19-inch aerodynamic alloy wheels that add some visual flair.

Inside, the cabin is cleanly executed with its pared-back styling and the 13.2-inch central display dominates the dashboard. This makes it the visual anchor of the interior as physical buttons are minimal and most functions are accessed via the media screen. That screen-led design will divide opinion, but it does create a modern aesthetic.

The synthetic leather upholstery feels convincingly premium, and the materials do enough to lift the ambience beyond what you might expect at this price point.

Nissan has done well to inject its own design flavour into the ute, because even though there’s inevitable similarity in the silhouette, it doesn’t just look like a Triton.

Impressive given a lot of the car is the same, and Nissan couldn’t change any of the hard points the Triton comes with. In fact, the Navara’s dimensions are largely the same as the Triton, coming in at 5320mm long, 1930mm wide and 1815mm tall.

The biggest Nissan-specific design element is a nod to the Navara’s heritage, the three little vent lines above the grille hark back to the original D21 generation ute which had these holes in the bonnet.

It’s subjective to some extent, but I reckon the Navara has the Triton beat on the design front.

Depending on the variant, you get some other indicators that this is no Triton, including a sports bar on the rear of the cabin with ‘Navara’ cut into it, or Pro-4X decals if that’s the variant you go for.

Given the lifestyle and off-road focus of the Pro-4X, it also has a bit more trim inside and out to feel more rugged and premium.

The Navara’s new interior is a big step up over the previous generation, even if it is genuinely all-Triton in there. The biggest change is the Nissan badge on the steering wheel.

It’s a ute, so there’s still a lot of plastic, cheap materials and even the nicer looking surfaces are in a few spots made of gloss black plastic (sometimes called piano black) which gets smudged easily and after a short while.

Up front, the J7 Track delivers where it matters. The electric front seats offer heating and ventilation functions and feel supportive over longer drives. There’s enough width and shoulder room to avoid feeling hemmed in.

Access is good with wide door apertures and an easy step-in, step-out height from both rows. In the rear, the available space is generous, and the thick seat padding and supportive backrests will make longer journeys quite comfortable. The flat floor also means the middle seat isn’t automatically the punishment position for an adult.

Storage has been thoughtfully considered. Up front, the large centre console shelves make it easy to keep clutter contained, while the dual-opening middle console is deep enough to swallow a small handbag. There’s also a small side pocket beside the driver that’s ideal for keys or a garage remote.

Rear passengers will enjoy four device pockets, as well as a couple of map pockets. There are two cupholders and drink bottle holders in each row, as well as good-sized bins in each door.

With all rows in use, the boot has up to 500L of capacity, and the flat loading floor makes it easy to slide larger items in and out. Overall, it’s a usable and practical space for gear storage but you'll notice the lack of a powered tailgate as there isn't a dedicated handhold on the outside of the lid to easily open the boot.

There's also no charging ports or power outlets in the boot, which feels unusual for a plug-in hybrid. You have to make do with a tyre repair kit rather than a spare wheel but that's not unusual in this corner of the market.

The individual charging options are functional with a single USB-A and C port offered in each row and a 12-volt socket up front but you miss out on a wireless charging pad in this grade. The multimedia touchscreen is responsive and the layout is fairly intuitive to use. However, the lack of physical controls for simple adjustments like side mirror positioning or climate control can become frustrating. Some functions are just better served by buttons.

The wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto operate smoothly and the CarPlay has maintained a steady connection this week. The built-in sat nav is also easy enough to use.

It’s a bit of a shame the Navara doesn’t benefit from the changes Nissan has been making to its interior design and layout recently, because it leaves older Nissans in the dust, in terms of design and ergonomics.

But, the Mitsubishi Triton’s interior isn’t a bad one for the Navara to have inherited, because it just works. It’s uncomplicated and sensible, if a little boring.

There are physical buttons for shortcuts, and the tech is relatively straightforward, even if it does also carry the downside of Android Auto being wired-only. It adds to the somewhat dated feeling the Navara’s interior carries, but the physical space itself is rather sensible.

The Navara’s seats are comfortable, and as the driver it’s easy to find your own preferred position, with the electric adjustment in higher variants being an extra help there.

The driving ergonomics and visibility are also good, which lines up well with the Navara’s driving dynamics and makes it feel less like you’re pedalling a big dual-cab around.

Behind the driver, there’s not heaps in the way of amenity, but the addition of USB ports once you’re past the base SL is welcome for second-row passengers, and the space isn’t cramped by any means.

The Navara has a tub capable of easily fitting a Euro pallet, according to Nissan’s specs, but with its distance of 1135mm between wheel arches, it won’t fit an Aussie pallet. The tub is almost square, at 1555mm long and 1545mm wide, and 525mm tall. 

Plus there’s the 3500kg towing capacity and its payload ranging between 964kg for the Pro-4X or up to 1064kg in the base SL.

The new D27 generation Navara starts from $53,348, before on-road costs, so it’s already more expensive than the Triton it’s based on, but we’ll get into the main, somewhat oily reasons for that in a bit. 

The Navara’s available in four variants at launch, SL, ST, ST-X and Pro-4X. They’re all 4X4 dual-cabs, so it’s mainly the features for each trim level that make the difference when it comes to pricing.

The SL starts off with a lot of the basics covered. There are LED headlights and tail-lights, climate control, the same 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen as the rest of the range and digital radio as well as Android Auto and Apple CarPlay.

Its aforementioned touchscreen is also a little larger than the one in the Triton it’s based on. Then there’s the 7.0-inch driver display screen which lives between the two physical dials.

At this point in the range the steering wheel is polyurethane and the floors aren’t carpeted, just covered with vinyl. It’s a work ute and it feels like one.

Things pick up slightly with the ST, which starts from $56,765, and gains alloy wheels, auto-folding mirrors, a leather-accented steering wheel and floor carpet, plus now side-steps and a sports bar. It also adds USB ports in the second row for charging, so it’s probably the minimum grade you’d want if you’re ever going to have kids in the back. Essentially, it gains a few things that make it feel a little more livable without getting too fancy.

The ST-X is a fair step up in price, it’s $63,177, but gets better suspension, 18-inch alloys, leather-accented and heated front seats and a power adjustable driver's seat, dual-zone climate and a wireless phone charger.

It also gains a centre limited-slip differential, drive modes more compatible with off-roading, different styling elements and push-button start, so you don’t need to use the physical key.

The top-of-the-range (until the Warrior arrives) is the $68,418 Pro-4X with more design changes, all-terrain tyres, a black sports bar and roof rails, contrast stitching and specific seats with Pro-4X styling. It’s the variant Nissan Australia expects to be the most popular, too. It also has the same diff and better suspension the ST-X gains.

Both plug-in hybrid grades of the J7 share the same powertrain, pairing a 1.5-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with a single electric motor. Combined outputs sit at a healthy 255kW and 525Nm which is the same as its Chery cousin and makes it more powerful than its MG rival but the GWM Haval H6 GT has bigger outputs.

However, once the EV battery is depleted and the system leans more heavily on the petrol engine, the outputs drop significantly to 105kW and 215Nm. This shifts the J7 from feeling spritely to serviceable on the open road.

Power is sent exclusively to the front wheels, and towing capacity is rated at 750kg unbraked. That’s enough for a small box trailer but it won’t be hauling any serious weekend toys.

A 150kW/470Nm four-cylinder turbo-diesel engine lies under the bonnet, which falls a little short of some rivals, but isn’t glaringly weak.

Its power lines up with, for example, the Toyota HiLux, but torque falls short of its rival’s 500Nm. It’s the same story for the Ranger, though that ute slips a nose ahead with 4.0kW more than HiLux and Navara in its four-cylinder guise.

The Navara’s six-speed automatic transmission also sends that power and torque to all four wheels, though how exactly it gets there depends on the spec and whether you have a centre differential or not.

The J7 Track has a Type 2 CCS charging port and accepts up to 6.6kW on AC power and up to 40kW on fast DC power. On that type of DC charger you can go from 30 - 80 per cent in as little as 20 minutes which is great for when you’re on the go. You can shop and charge without much fuss.

The 18.3kWh lithium-iron phosphate battery supports an electric-only driving range of up 90km (WLTP). That sits below its Haval and MG rivals with their respective WLTP ranges of 153km and 120km. Overall though, the J7 has a theoretical driving range over around 1200km, which is great. Of course, you will only see that type of range if you regularly charge it.

Jaecoo claims a combined fuel cycle usage (urban/extra-urban) of 1.0L/100km but my real-world usage has come out at 5.0L/100km even after regularly charging it. However, it's worth noting that I do a lot of longer, highway driving which is where plug-in hybrids are typically less efficient.

Jaecoo recommends a minimum 91 RON unleaded petrol to be used for the J7.

From the Navara’s 75L tank, a claimed 7.7L/100km is used on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, though on the launch drive we saw the trip computer hovering around 9.0L/100km.

With a few hundred kilos in the tray, that jumped up to the low 11s.

Hypothetically, if you manage to get close to Nissan’s claimed consumption, you should be able to get more than 900km out of a single tank of diesel. Nissan’s claim isn’t too outrageous, either, considering the type of driving a car launch generally consists of isn’t normally conducive to favourable fuel consumption figures.

This is where the J7 Track feels less resolved. It's not fundamentally flawed by any means but it's not as polished as it could be.

With a charged battery, acceleration is strong and immediate, and there’s enough punch for hills and confident overtaking. Even when the battery is running low, the drop in output doesn’t feel as dramatic in real-world conditions as the standalone engine figures might suggest. You won't win any drag races but it remains competent. It just loses some of the initial punch when accelerating.

Steering is light, which makes urban manoeuvring easy, and the suspension leans toward the softer side. Around town, that translates to a comfortable and compliant ride. Push it harder through bends, though, and the body control starts to feel a little loose.

Highway refinement is another area where there’s room for improvement. Road noise becomes noticeably more present at open-road speeds, although it remains quiet around town.

Visibility out the front and sides is good, and the driving position gives you a fairly commanding view of the road. I don’t feel like there are any large blind spots from my driving position.

There are three levels of regenerative braking, and running it in the strongest setting does a good job of harvesting energy. However, even on the lowest setting, the braking response feels abrupt. At low speeds when the system tends to remain in EV mode, the transition can feel lurchy.

The 360-degree camera system is clear and outside of the heavy-handed regen braking, the J7 is straightforward to park. Just be prepared for passengers, especially opinionated children, to comment on the body movement.

Now we get to the biggest reason you’d consider a Navara over the Triton it’s based on.

While the Navara benefits from having a relatively new platform underneath it - thanks Mitsubishi - it’s still a ladder-frame dual-cab ute so expectations weren’t exactly on the floor, but they also weren’t sky-high.

And sure, a lot of the details about the new Navara aren’t groundbreaking, nor is much of the way it drives - but the changes Premcar has made to the suspension in this ute are well worth the extra outlay.

What Premcar has done with the Navara, on what we would guess is a relatively constrained budget, is find the most cost-effective way to make the ute better to drive.

They went with upgraded dampers which have been tuned to balance control and comfort with the ute’s off-road ability.

The result? A very controlled front-end, more communicative steering and confidence on the road to drive over even rough surfaces without fear of being flung off the road. Ladder-frame utes don't normally feel so controlled over rough surfaces at high speeds.

It’s worth noting that while the SL and ST still benefit from the suspension upgrades, the ST-X and Pro-4X in particular are much better to drive than you’d expect from a dual-cab ute.

Some of the roads around Canberra are particularly rough, even close to town where the speeds are lower, but the Navara handled myriad surfaces and conditions on- and off-road, in the soaking wet and when it was bone-dry.

Aside from one particular section of the launch that may have just been a little unkind to the ‘stiffer’ sidewalls on the ST-X compared to the Pro-4X, the Navara’s behaviour was not only confidence-building, but allowed for a degree of fun not normally present in the class.

The steering feel left no guesswork necessary, and there’s not a huge on-centre dead-spot as is often the case in a dual-cab. Nice and direct without being too heavy.

The Navara’s weak point, which still gets a pass mark, is probably that its drivetrain now feels older than the ute in which it lives. The outputs are passable, and the transmission finds the correct place well enough, but in a world of 10-speed autos in Rangers or petrol plug-in hybrids, a bog-standard turbo-diesel with six gears has to be bang-on perfect to keep up. 

The Navara’s is adequate, but once you’re used to it, the drive experience is a step above most in the ute segment in terms of control, something that’s hard to come by in this segment.

It translates well to off-roading, where the ute’s front-end settles very quickly over ridges and undulating surfaces without the harshness of a too-stiff set of dampers.

Unsealed roads feel easily dispatched even at relatively high speeds, and with the right tyres (a la Pro-4X) the Navara is a seriously capable thing.

If you find yourself the owner of a D27 Navara and never leave the bitumen, you’re missing out.

The new Navara inherits the Triton’s maximum five-star ANCAP rating from testing in 2024. It scored notably well in Child Occupant protection, though its score for Safety Assist isn’t as high as some rivals.

Eight airbags mean the Navara’s got occupants cushioned in case of the worst, while the whole range has the same suite of safety tech, including a surround-view camera, forward collision warning and AEB, front- and rear-cross traffic alert, driver monitoring and traffic sign recognition, front and rear parking sensors and trailer sway control.

The Navara’s driver monitoring, however, suffers the same overzealousness as the Triton. Nissan didn’t reprogram any of the ADAS systems which means the car will regularly accuse you of being distracted if you’re not looking directly at the road ahead. Checking mirrors or a map in the centre screen will trigger this.

The Chinese lucky number '8' is heavily featured in the ownership as the J7 is offered with an eight-year/unlimited km warranty, eight years of battery cover and roadside assistance, plus eight years of capped-price servicing where services average just $422 per visit. That's an impressive suite of terms for the class.

Servicing is well-spaced at every 12 months or 15,000 kilometres and for now the service network is still fairly small, with around 50 centres nationwide.

Nissan’s 10-year/300,000km warranty is fantastic but applies only if you service with Nissan. It’s five years with no kilometre limit otherwise. 

There’s five years' of flat-price servicing at $499 per visit, every 12-months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Roadside assist is also free for a decade if you service with Nissan, or a year otherwise.

Given there are around 180 Nissan dealers nationwide, finding one shouldn’t be a challenge.