Isuzu MU-X vs Nissan X-TRAIL

What's the difference?

So, engine aside, not much new for the 2024 MU-X, but I can confidently say this: if you’re not towing big loads all of the time, then the 1.9-litre turbo-diesel won’t just save you cash at the dealership, but at the service station, too.

The Nissan X-Trail ST-L 7 Seat is easy to drive, has some great features and fit my family of three just fine. The on-road handling is solid and there’s enough power under the bonnet for longer road trips. On a car this size, I’m not sure those extra two seats are worth losing the boot space but if you occasionally need to ferry your kid's friend to a game or something, it will be worthwhile. There are a few little things that aren’t quite up to a standard I like to see but overall, we like this one and it gets a 7.5/10 from us.

If you like the look of the 2023 Isuzu MU-X, then boy have I got good news for you, because the changes to the 2024 model occur under the bonnet, and nowhere else, really. That means you get the same simple, boxy exterior design, which emphasises capability over fanciness.

Yes, the MU-X design is more dependable than daring, but I reckon it works, with the three-row SUV cutting a fairly handsome figure, even if it is yet to receive the design tweaks just rolled out on the updated Isuzu D-Max.

Inside, though, it definitely presents as a little utilitarian, with some plastics that feel like they could survive a nuclear blast, and the 7.0- and 9.0-inch central screens both feel a little underwhelming by modern standards.

It all feels very comfortable and hard-wearing though, which is probably every bit as important, given the MU-X’s target market.

There was something robustly charming about the previous X-Trail shape and while the overall size has been maintained, most of the squared edges have been softened in the new model.

It makes it appear far more modern and it should maintain its kerbside appeal for years to come.

There’s quite a lot of chrome on the grille, making it look enormous. However, the black plastic moulding that wraps the car at its base helps it look sportier than it has the right to look. As does the dark privacy glass at the rear.

The interior hosts soft touchpoints, synthetic leather trims and wood-like grey panelling to create an upmarket finish.

I'm not a massive fan of the brown/black two-toned trim on the dashboard and doors; it just doesn't land with me.

But it does create a bit of interest for the cabin space.

Practicality has always been a sizeable MU-X perk, regardless of the engine. 

That starts with seven seats, and a back row where actual full-size humans can spend time — and there are not many three-row SUVs you can say that about.

I’m 175cm tall and while I wouldn’t pick row three as my first choice, I’d happily sit back there for short hops.

The middle row, too, is pretty spacious, though it is lacking in a few creature comforts, with just the air-con vents (but no temp controls) and a couple of USB ports to keep you company.

And remember when I said the brand was promising the 1.9-litre engine wouldn’t cost much in terms of capability? Well, Isuzu says the braked towing capacity for models fitted with the smaller engine is 3000kg, while the payload figure increases — now up to 735kg — mostly because the new engine is about 70 kilos lighter. Models fitted with the 3.0-litre turbo-diesel are still rated to tow 3.5-tonne. 

The MU-X stretches 4850mm in length, 1870mm in width and 1815mm in height and it sits on a 2855mm wheelbase, which means while there’s plenty of cabin space it’s not too ridiculous to park.

You’ll find 311 litres of boot space with all three rows in place, growing to 1119 litres with the second row folded flat and 2138 litres with just the front two seats in action.

Every MU-X model will offer at least 800mm in wading depth and 230mm ground clearance, too.

For my little family’s needs this week, I found it to be fairly practical most of the time. The front and middle rows have loads of space and even taller passengers will find comfort with the legroom and headroom in both!

The third row should be considered as ’sometimes’ seats for kids because the legroom is very tight. Besides two cupholders, there are also no amenities back there. Adults will curse you if they get stuck back there for long.

The front row enjoys the most storage options with a deep middle console, a phone/utility tray and glove box. There are also large storage bins in each door and two deep cupholders. The sunglasses holder in the roof is a bonus, too!

The middle row gets a couple of map pockets, drink bottle holders in each door and a couple of cupholders in the fold-down middle seat, which doubles as an armrest. The practical, easy-to-clean trim on the back of the front seats is great, too.

The charging options are good for the first two rows, with each one getting an USB-A and USB-C port, while the front also gets a 12-volt socket.

It is easy enough to connect to the wired Apple CarPlay and the 8.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system is responsive.

I found the digital radio cuts in and out every few seconds, which makes that feature a bit useless. There’s no satellite navigation but with your smart phone attached, it’s easily forgotten.

My six-year old had no trouble getting in and out of the car and really enjoyed the tall seating position. He also liked having directional air vents and a reading light on our little road trip this week.

The boot is 465L and that puts it on the smaller side compared to its rivals, with only the CX-5 being smaller. I like the level load space and retractable cargo blind, but after my big grocery shop the boot was full.

You’d have to get strategic with gear loading on a full-scale road trip.

This has a temporary spare tyre but to access it, you have to remove the third row (after sliding the second row forward) and that would be an pain to access if you had a full car load of gear and child seats.

Being a lower grade this doesn’t have a powered tailgate and I did miss it this week because the boot is heavy to close.  

Our model is the part-time four-wheel drive ST-L with seven seats and it is $46,290, before on-road costs.

That makes it more expensive compared to its key rivals with the Mazda CX-5 AWD Touring costing $43,700 and Kia Sportage SX+ Petrol DCT AWD at $43,850. Only the Toyota RAV4 Edge tops it with a $53,020 price tag.

However, for a model that sits second from the bottom in its own line-up, it’s well-specified.

There are eight paintwork colours to choose from and none of them cost extra. This grade also enjoys an upmarket interior with two-toned synthetic leather trims, heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto plus those two extra seats.

The driver also enjoys four-way electric lumbar support and electric seat adjustments. The exterior isn’t forgotten with 18-inch alloy wheels, full LED lights, electric folding side mirrors and an auto dimming rear view mirror.

Let’s focus on the new engine option here, with the 1.9-litre turbo-diesel delivering 110kW and 350Nm. They don’t sound like massive numbers, but Isuzu makes the point that the torque delivery is wide, with maximum grunt available from 1800rpm to 2600rpm, and 300Nm available from 1550rpm to 3700rpm, meaning there’s power there when you need it.

The new engine pairs with a six-speed Aisin tramsission and delivers power to two or all four wheels.

Excluding the ePower hybrid, the X-Trail shares the same 2.5-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine across its models. It has max outputs of 135kW and 244Nm, which means it’s not super powerful but it doesn’t really whine at you, either.

I’m not a massive fan of continuously variable transmissions and this one can get a little jerky when you put your foot down. It's smooth otherwise.

The part-time 4WD drivetrain is an interesting feature for this size SUV but I didn’t test its capabilities this week. You can choose between five modes - 'Auto', 'Eco', 'Sport', 'Snow' and 'Off-Road' but I kept it in Auto.

Another perk of the smaller engine is a smaller fuel bill, with the 1.9-litre turbo-diesel promising to drink 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle - almost a litre less than the 3.0-litre 4x4 model, which is more like 8.3L/100km. 

Emissions drop, too, with the smaller engine rated at 196g/km of C02 combined, compared with 220g/km on for the 3.0-litre 4x4 model.

Impact on the hip pocket? Well, fewer trips to the service station for one. Isuzu says the 80-litre fuel tank should deliver almost 1100km of driving between refills.

The official combined cycle fuel figure is 7.8L/100km and real-world testing saw my average at 8.1L. That’s pretty good for an SUV of this size and it was after a lot of open road and urban driving (think school and grocery runs).

The X-Trail has a 55L fuel tank and based on the official combined figure, you should be able to get around 705km of driving range. Perfectly respectable for the odd road trip or family vacay.

Nissan recommends a minimum of 91 RON petrol and adds that it is E10 suitable.

First things first, you can absolutely tow with the smaller MU-X engine. In fact, we attached a load weighing close to its 3.0-tonne maximum and the Isuzu just hunkered down and got to work.

It must be said, though, it’s nowhere near as effortless as when you have the bigger 3.0-litre turbo-diesel engine up front, which dispatches heavy loads clinically and easily.

The smaller option has to try harder and rev higher, and while it’s easy enough on downhill runs or flats, it’s noticeably slower when heading up hill.

It does demand the question of how often you’ll be attaching close to its rated maximum on the towball, though. If it’s often, the bigger engine is definitely for you. But if it’s occasionally, or your tow loads are lighter, you can definitely make do with the 1.9-litre option.

On the road, the 1.9-litre engine’s power delivery is actually pretty well suited to the MU-X. It’s not fast, of course, but the width of the torque band helps deliver grunt when you need it (to a point) especially in the low-end, and I reckon the whole experience is a bit smoother and quieter than with the bigger engine, too.

You are missing some of that effortless grunt, of course, and you still can’t escape the usual diesel noise that permeates the cabin, but the lower fuel use for lower power feels like a fairly decent trade. 

It won’t be for everyone, and cross-country travellers and towers will no doubt go for the bigger unit, but for everyone else the 1.9-litre is a pretty sensible option.

The X-Trail ST-L delivered a solid performance in all the situations I put it in this week.

I was just as happy tackling the open-road as I was in stop-start traffic in the city.

It has enough power to get up to speed quickly and keep you there but you don’t feel like you have heaps left in reserve. The engine can sook a little when you get too aggressive with the accelerator but otherwise works without complaint.

The ride comfort is great! I took my dad on a road trip this week and he was singing its praises as a passenger. As a driver, I like how cushioned the suspension feels but it’s not at all floaty on the road.

The cabin space is very quiet, even at higher speeds. However, I wasn’t super impressed with the sound system and reckon it could be better.

Despite, looking like a big car, it doesn’t park like one. It’s actually stupidly easy to park and that’s a winning feature for me. Especially with the crisp 360-degree view camera, too. 

The X-Trail has been fitted with a good list of safety features, with the following being standard: LED daytime running lights, lane departure alert, lane keeping aid, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, 360-degree view reversing camera, dynamic parking guidelines, front and rear parking sensors, rear occupant alert, intelligent seatbelt monitoring and a driver fatigue monitoring system.

It also features adaptive cruise control with lane keeping assist; meaning, so long as you have your hands on the wheel, the car essentially steers itself. It's great to minimise fatigue on longer journeys.

It has AEB and forward collision warning with car, pedestrian and cyclist detection which is operational from 10-80km/h (5.0-130km/h for car detection). It is usual to see it operational from 5.0km/h, though. 

The X-Trail was awarded a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating in 2021 but it is based on its stablemate, the Qashqai. I think it’s worth mentioning that ANCAP’s individual assessment scores were all fairly high (hitting the 90 per cent range for all but one) which is great to see on a family car.

It only has seven airbags but that includes a front centre airbag and curtain airbags covering all three rows. 

There are ISOFIX child seat mounts on the outboard seats in the middle row, along with three top-tethers. You could get lucky in fitting three seats side by side but two will fit best. There's just enough room when a 0-4 rearward facing child seat is installed.

Every Isuzu MU-X model gets a six-year, 150,000km warranty, as well as five years of capped price servicing, and up two seven years of roadside assistant. 

The service are 12 months or 15,000km, and each service costs $449 per year, or a total $2245 over five years.

The X-Trail comes with the market standard five-year/unlimited km warranty term and you can pre-purchase three-, four- or five-year capped-price servicing plans. 

On the five-year pre-paid plan, services average $425 annually which is great for this class.

Servicing intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, which could get a little annoying if you put a lot of kays on your car every year.