Honda ZR-V vs Suzuki Vitara

What's the difference?

The Honda ZR-V has always been an engaging and fun car that’s the right size for many people. The frugal hybrid powertrain has always been the pick too.

It’s great that Honda has finally introduced more affordable hybrid trims with this update which addresses one of my biggest criticisms of this car previously.

If you’re willing to forgo some luxury features, this entry-level hybrid trim is a fantastic car that still offers enough creature comforts to be driven daily.

Hopefully Honda has some renewed sales success with this car as I believe it’s a clear benchmark for the segment.

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

The exterior of the ZR-V has always left me feeling quite… meh. It’s a mundane and generic look that doesn’t stand out from the crowd, but that's no bad thing because not everyone wants a flashy car.

That said, I’m still not a fan of the front grille, which makes it look like this car has a moustache.

The dark red paint looks nice, though when it’s paired with these generic-looking grey alloy wheels and black wheel arch cladding, it cheapens the look. The top-spec e:HEV LX looks more attractive.

Inside, it’s similarly standard and doesn’t break the mould. Everything is where you’d expect it to be, which is great for functionality.

The wildest part of the interior is the centre tunnel which features a push-button gear selector and a split console section including a small storage area underneath that’s big enough for a phone.

Looking around, it’s a sea of black finishes, which is a bit boring. However, I do like the mesh panel that spans the dashboard and houses the air vents. It’s a premium touch.

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

In base-model form, it’s expected the ZR-V will have fabric upholstery. However, the seats still feel premium and are deliciously padded. They’re manually adjusted but I was still able to find a good driving position with ease.

One feature I was looking for was heated seats, especially on these brisk Melbourne mornings. It’s rare for a car with fabric seats to get heated seats, though. If you want them that badly, they’re available on higher trims.

Ahead of the driver is a leather-wrapped steering wheel which feels lovely. I particularly like the tactile feel of the buttons and switches.

The digital instrument cluster is clear and crisp. It offers multiple views to customise it, as well as a range of infographic pages to cycle through. I wish you could see the fuel consumption and hybrid system graphics at the same time, but thankfully they’re just a single scroll away from each other.

Moving across, the central touchscreen multimedia system is looking a small in 2026, measuring only 9.0 inches, although it’s still high-resolution and the colours are vibrant.

It appears computing power has been given a boost along with the integration of Google Built-in, as jumping from menu to menu has never been snappier.

Speaking of Google Built-in, it’s great to have the flexibility of using the integrated Google Maps and apps like Spotify and Apple Music, without needing your phone.

However, it’s still nice having Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, though the latter is strangely only offered in wired form. With my iPhone 15 Pro Max, the wireless connection was rock solid, though known interference points did cause CarPlay to stutter.

It’s great to see Honda retaining a physical climate control cluster as it’s intuitive to use. The dials in particular have a satisfying click when twirled.

In terms of storage there are two cupholders, two USB-C ports, a big centre console box, as well as an adequately sized glove box. It’s worth noting this trim level forgoes a wireless charger, meaning you’ll need to plug in to charge your phone.

Moving to the second row, there’s a surprising amount of space, even for adults. At a leggy 182cm, I have plenty of legroom and headroom.

You would easily be able to get two adults in the second row, though you’d be pushing it to fit three as the middle seat is narrow and raised. Kids will be fine, though.

Adding to the annoyance of the middle rear seat, the seat belt is mounted from the roof, which can obstruct rear visibility.

In terms of amenities there are air vents on the back of the front centre console, two USB-C ports, map pockets on the back of each front seat, as well as a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders.

There are also ISOFIX points on the two outboard seats, as well as top-tether child seat anchorages on all three rear seats.

Around the back it’s expected the entry-level hybrid will feature a manually operated tailgate. It’s light to open and close.

With the rear seats upright there’s 380L of boot space available, which is decent for this size of car. This figure includes a small underfloor section.

If you fold the rear seats the boot space expands to 1312L, which is cavernous for this type of car. The rear seats cleverly fold forwards and down at the same time, creating a seamless flat floor.

Boot-related amenities include a number of hooks, a 12V socket plus some lights. As is the case with many hybrids, the ZR-V e:HEV doesn’t come with any spare wheel. You need to make do with a tyre repair kit, which is nowhere near as handy if you have a proper puncture away from a tyre repair shop.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

From $39,990 (all prices are drive-away unless stated otherwise), 2026’s cheapest Vitara, the Turbo Hybrid 2WD, seems provocatively expensive for an 11-year-old generation. And the all-wheel drive (AWD) model dubbed 'AllGrip' is a heady $46,000. Oof.

This puts the base Vitara’s price well above Chinese hybrid equivalents like the Haval Jolion HEV and MG ZS Hybrid+, about on a par with popular small-SUV hybrids including the Honda HR-V, Hyundai Kona and Toyota Corolla Cross, and in company with lower-spec petrol-powered iterations of the Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Seltos, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-30, Mitsubishi ASX, Mitsubishi Outlander, Nissan X-Trail, Renault Duster, Subaru Crosstrek, Skoda Kamiq, Volkswagen T-Cross and VW T-Roc.

Facing a lion’s den of fierce rivals is putting things mildly. The Vitara’s value struggles to stack up.

But consider this.

Back in 2015, the base Vitara cost $23K, drive-away – or $31.4K in 2026 money adjusted for inflation. However, that was for a 1.6-litre petrol manual; the auto added the equivalent of another $2.7K and the optional turbo that came soon after (dubbed 'BoosterJet' – and now standard equipment) cost another $6.8K, coming to $41K.

Huh. Suzuki isn’t being so delusionally greedy, then.

And that’s not taking in the latest model’s unique hybrid tech, extra safety of advanced driver-assist technologies (ADAS) such as autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert (RCTA), lane departure warning and blind-spot monitoring, or Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity, or a host of other extra features that have since been applied to an evolving Vitara over the years. Plus, import costs from Hungary are said to have skyrocketed.

If we compare what the 2026 Turbo Hybrid 2WD costs against the pre-facelift 2024 Turbo 2WD from $36,490, before on-road costs, the price rises aren’t nearly as bad as they seem (though runout ’24-build models are currently being promoted at $34,590, drive-away).

So, what else does your $40K-plus Vitara Turbo Hybrid give you?

Not much compared to most of the competition listed earlier. Climate control, rear privacy glass, LED automatic headlights, cloth upholstery, adaptive cruise control, a 7.0-inch touchscreen, reversing camera, 17-inch alloy wheels and flat paint are bare minimum at this price point.

Metallic paint demands another $745 if the standard white isn’t your bag.

Stretching to the $45,990 AWD adds a panoramic sunroof, 9.0-inch touchscreen, six instead of four speakers, extra driving modes, synthetic leather trim and two extra modish colours – beige or grey-blue that are also available with a two-tone black combo for an extra $1345.

The Vitara is over a decade old, but costs new-model money, lacks features found in rivals costing thousands less and only allows for a five-year warranty when some others offer up to 10.

Obama was US President when this Suzuki launched. The world it finds itself in today seems almost unrecognisable.

Power in the ZR-V hybrid continues to come from a 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol engine with two electric motors. Total system outputs are 135kW and 315Nm.

This is sent to the front wheels only via an electronic continuously variable transmission (eCVT).

The Honda hybrid system positions the engine primarily as a generator for the battery pack at lower speeds, however once you reach 60-70km/h it can couple with the front axle and directly power the wheels.

It’s a smart system that allows for an electric zippy feel at lower speeds with the backing of a petrol engine at higher speeds.

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

Honda claims the ZR-V hybrid consumes an average of 5.0L/100km on the combined cycle, according to ADR testing.

In practice, I’ve seen way less than this, which is fantastic. On one particular drive around the city I achieved a mind-boggling average of 3.7L/100km, but my overall average hovered around 4.5L/100km.

There is a 57L fuel tank and a minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol is required.

You should easily be able to travel more than 1000km per refill, so don’t expect to be visiting servos very often.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

The ZR-V’s hybrid powertrain has oodles of zip, thanks to there being two electric motors which handle a lot of the low-speed grunt.

It’s surprising how much of the driving can be done on electric power alone, provided there’s enough battery charge. Even at highway and freeway speeds the engine will switch off and coast on electric power alone.

When the petrol engine kicks on, you can barely feel it in the cabin or through the accelerator pedal. Instead you’ll only hear a familiar CVT-like drone as the engine charges the battery.

The petrol engine drone is noticeable but the note it makes more pleasant than a Toyota hybrid. Plus when you push the accelerator that bit harder it pretends to shift through gears, making the driving experience more engaging.

At higher speeds there’s plenty of oomph as the petrol engine and electric motors work in tandem. It feels like the powertrain is never stressed, making for an effortless touring feel.

There are a number of different regenerative braking modes accessed via the paddle shifters. The default is the weakest which allows you to coast more like a regular, pure-combustion car.

You can ramp up the intensity of the regenerative braking but there is no 'one-pedal' driving mode and you’re required to use the brake pedal to come to a complete stop.

From the driver’s seat you have a commanding view of the road ahead thanks to the elevated driving position. There are also large side mirrors and a big rear envelope, giving good all-around visibility.

Around town the ZR-V has a nimble feel thanks to its light-ish steering. This translates to a dynamic feel with a touch more weight out on the open road.

It’s surprising how engaging and fun this car is to drive, especially because it’s a regular SUV with no obvious sporty characteristics.

The suspension errs towards soft, but this helps soak up sharper bumps. This car never feels uncomfortable from behind the wheel which is at least partially down to the 18-inch alloy wheels being the right diameter for a car of this size.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

Back in 2015, the Vitara scored a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test rating, but it hasn’t been tested since and that result expired in December, 2022.

Both models come with the expected level of ADAS tech, including AEB, RCTA, lane departure warning, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitor, traffic sign recognition, auto high beam and adaptive cruise control.

There is no data on the operation parameters of the latest AEB system, but previous models operated from above 30km/h while the RCTA functions from 8.0km/h.

Six airbags (dual front, side and curtain) are also featured, along with two outboard rear-seat ISOFIX points and a trio of top tethers for child seats.

ZR-V owners receive a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty as standard, whereas the high-voltage battery is covered for eight years.

If you service at Honda dealers when required, however, the standard warranty coverage is extended to eight years. This is more on par with many mainstream brands.

Speaking of servicing, it’s required every 12 months or 10,000km. The latter may be troublesome if you do a lot of kilometres.

The first five services are capped at $199. This is very affordable and on par with Toyota.

There are close to 90 'Honda Centres' across the country covering state and territory capitals as well as key rural and regional centres.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.