GWM Cannon vs Peugeot Partner

What's the difference?

The latest version of the Cannon ute displays commendable improvement in key areas like drivetrain and chassis tuning, along with a benchmark 3500kg tow rating, heaps of standard equipment and a generous warranty for a list price well under $50K. For a tradie on a budget, it represents value that's hard to ignore.

It might not be the most modern looking or feeling small van, but amongst its competitors, the Partner stands out for its relative value and load-lugging capabilities.

It’s somewhat fun to drive but now feels a bit plain on the inside, and could benefit from a few extra options and features to make it more comfortable and maybe even a little more customisable.

Still, I think the Peugeot Partner will fit the needs of many primarily city-based small businesses or tradies who want to work out of a compact and easy-to-drive van instead of an unwieldy and often overkill dual-cab ute.

The upgraded Cannon brings refreshed exterior styling, with the front fascia featuring a new grille and bumper design, larger fog lights and more subtle use of chrome highlights.

At the rear there’s more prominent (and permanent) brand identification with bold ‘GWM’ lettering embossed on the tailgate panel, which is a welcome blast from our pick-up past.

The spacious interior design has also been enhanced with use of what GWM calls ‘premium materials’ including soft-touch surfaces on the dash and door panels along with subtle chrome accents.

There’s also a new steering wheel and the centre console has been redesigned with less buttons and dials (not always a good thing) topped by the new multimedia touchscreen.

The Partner’s recent update brings with it a new, more contemporary face, with the ‘claw’ style light fittings clasping a body-coloured panel in place of the usual grille fitting. It also updates all the badgework to match the French brand’s passenger car range.

Thanks to these upgrades, as well as the fetching colour and Premium body-matching highlights, it looks pretty schmick at a distance, but up close you can start to tell the Partner’s relative age.

It simply doesn’t look as contemporary or coherent in its design as the much newer ground-up fifth-generation Caddy or third-generation Renault Kangoo with which it competes.

A big part of this is due to the Partner being based on a much older platform which is shared across a lot of Stellantis brands. It started life as the third-generation Citroen Berlingo in 2018, and needs to warp its look overseas to fit the Fiat Doblo, Toyota Proace and Vauxhall Combo (although the Partner is the only version sold in Australia).

As a result, up close you can see its somewhat pieced together brand identity bits and boxy, upright bodywork.

There are some odd touches, like the plastic bumper at the front not matching the gloss black highlights or body coloured bumper at the rear, and the contemporary badgework finished in a matt grey adds yet another texture and colour to the mix.

The theme continues inside, with a huge plastic dash piece jutting into the cabin space. Here, the bits from Peugeot’s passenger car range have been integrated, including the cool 'squircle' steering wheel, digital dash elements and the multimedia screen.

In the centre, the electric shifter part from cars like the current 2008 small SUV has been embedded in the sea of plastic.

It technically matches the brand identity, but it doesn't stop the Partner’s interior from feeling a bit cobbled together, rather than the more unified corporate identity which is so well executed in the VW Caddy, which is almost hard to tell apart from a Golf.

The software is another area the Partner could use some work. It’s fairly simple and straightforward to use, but the layout isn’t very customizable, both for the multimedia suite and digital dash.

Again, the Caddy runs rings around Peugeot in this department, with its more impressively-featured and nicer-looking software it shares with other VW Group passenger cars.

There are also little areas which feel like they’re behind the pace for a top-spec variant. The steering wheel is hard plastic without even the option for a softer wrap, for example, and the Caddy offers an alternate optional synthetic leather seat trim for an operator willing to dish out a little extra cash.

With its 2230kg kerb weight and 3225kg GVM, the Cannon Ultra has a 995kg payload rating (that’s close enough to a ‘one-tonner’ by our measure) and the latest upgrades include an increase in braked tow rating from the previous 3000kg to the class-benchmark 3500kg.

However, with its 6200kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) our test vehicle would require a substantial payload reduction of more than half a tonne (525kg) to tow its maximum trailer weight (but it’s not alone there).

And that would leave 470kg of payload capacity, most of which could be used up by the weight of a hefty five-member working crew before you could think about loading any of their tools and other equipment.

Fact is, few (if any) owners would need to tow 3500kg, but it’s important to be aware of these numbers if you do plan to tow that heavy and want to stay on the right side of the law.

The square load tub is 1520mm long and wide and 540mm deep, but with 1146mm between the rear wheel-housings it won’t fit a standard Aussie pallet. However, it will accommodate Euro pallets, if hauling such payloads is important.

The tub’s internal surfaces are protected by a spray-in liner and there are load-anchorage points front and back, with the rears close to floor level (ideal for all loads) and the fronts near the tops of the sidewalls (not ideal for low loads). The tailgate is equipped with hydraulic dampers to assist opening/closing and the handy fold-out step allows easy entry to the load tub.

Cabin storage includes a bottle holder and bin in each front door, a small lower dash compartment on the driver’s right and a slender bin above the glove box on the passenger side.

The centre console has a wireless phone-charging pad, 12V socket and two USB ports up front, plus cup/small-bottle holders and a lidded box at the back with an internal air conditioning cooling vent and sliding upper storage tray.

The rear seat has adequate legroom even for tall people, given I’m 186cm and have about 60mm of knee clearance when seated behind the driver’s seat in my position.

Headroom is adequate though not as generous and the deep contour in the roof lining to allow for the sunroof can make tall rear passengers feel a bit closed-in.

Shoulder room can also be squeezy for three large Aussies, so like all dual cab utes short of a full-size US pick-up it’s okay for short trips but ideal for two on longer drives.

There’s a bin and bottle-holder in each rear door and pockets on both front seat backrests. The 60/40-split seat bases can also fold up and by stored vertically for more internal load space, or to access wheel-changing equipment.

So design-wise the Partner might barely hit the brief when it comes to matching it up with Peugeot passenger car design, but one area where it manages to shine is in-cabin storage.

There’s lots on offer, massive bottle holders and pockets in the doors, storage areas galore in the big plastic dash, with trays in the centre and passenger side, as well as behind the multimedia screen and under the shifter.

There are a set of non-variable bottle holders cut out of the top of the dash, as well as hidden storage compartments under both front passenger seats.

I should mention at this point the Partner has a three-across front bench, although actually putting three people in there will be quite the squeeze, especially given the centre of the dash juts quite far into the cabin area, leaving the centre occupant with nowhere to put their knees.

Maybe it will suit a child in a pinch if you plan to have this as a small business vehicle which may need to be dual-purpose from time to time.

There’s also a fold-down rotating table thing in the backrest of the centre position, designed to be used with a laptop. Another feature of the Partner’s dash is physical toggles and buttons for the climate controls, which are increasingly rare in favour of touch-based menus.

In terms of load area dimensions, the Partner LWB offers 3.9 cubic metres (excluding the bulkhead) and dimensions come in at 2167mm long, 1527mm wide (1229 between the arches) and 1243mm tall. This should accommodate two Euro-sized palettes.

Loading and securing should also be relatively breezy thanks to sliding doors on both sides, a barn door rear which hinges out of the way for forklift loading, and no less than 10 tie down rings.

It also scores decent LED lighting in the roof, so you can see what you’re doing in a poorly lit warehouse, or when using the load area at night.

As for capacities, the Partner LWB has a payload of 898kg. It claims a 950kg braked towing capacity (not much more than the unbraked of 740kg) although in reality 740 seems to be closer to the limit thanks to the 74kg towball download rating.

How does this compare to the Caddy? I was surprised to find the Caddy 5 in equivalent LWB form has a smaller load area (3.7 cubic metres) and a significantly lower payload of 695kg.

However, it can tow slightly more (up to a claimed 1500kg - however has a 75kg max towball download). Additionally, the Partner isn’t able to be fitted with a tailgate to replace the barn doors (an option which some buyers may prefer on the Caddy).

A full size spare wheel is present on all variants to keep you on the road.

Given the uniquely European nature of a van like this, it makes sense the remaining options offered to us are only from French and German makers.

In fact, this Peugeot Partner is one of just three left for you to choose from. Starting from $39,990, before on-roads (for a Pro SWB), the Partner goes into battle against its Gallic nemesis, the Renault Kangoo, and the defending small van champion in the form of VW’s popular fifth-generation Caddy.

Unlike its rivals, though, the Partner range is automatic only and exclusively powered by a three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine (if you exclude the electric ePartner).

This immediately gives it a leg up, as in its most affordable form, it already undercuts the base manual Caddy (TSI220 SWB - $40,990) and most affordable automatic Kangoo (SWB auto - $41,990) although the Renault holds onto the most affordable price-tag in the segment if you’re happy shifting yourself, at $38,990 for its SWB manual.

The specific version we’re looking at for this review is the Premium LWB, which wears a price-tag of $45,990 and adds an additional 350mm to its length over the SWB.

Standard kit on Premium versions includes items otherwise missing on the Pro, like 16-inch alloy wheels instead of steel wheels, LED headlights instead of halogen, push-start ignition instead of turn-key, dual-zone climate instead of single-zone as well as body-coloured highlights, rails and door handles in place of plain plastic fittings.

Standard items across the range include a 10-inch central touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a digital instrument cluster, cloth seat trim, a 180-degree reversing camera, a digital rear vision mirror to make up for the standard windowless barn doors, a glaze-finish bulkhead to separate the cabin and load area, as well as an array of active safety items we’ll explore later.

The fetching blue scheme our car was painted in comes at an additional $690, and from there you can modify further with an array of factory options.

Key among them are a choice of windows for each sliding door ($486 each) or the barn door ($503), a metal cargo barrier to protect the bulkhead ($1146), an LED cargo light kit ($350), roof racks ($536) or a more comprehensive roof kit ($2610).

Additionally, long-wheelbase versions can be equipped with a cargo bay floor kit ($894), wall protection kit ($960) or the rubber floor mat which our van had ($600).

A complete towing set-up will set you back $1045 for the towbar and $510 for the wiring harness.

From a base of nearly $50K then, you can easily add a few thousand to the price once you start ticking boxes, but it is important to note not every commercial van, even ones a size up, offer this level of factory customisation.

This gives the Partner deeper (and warranty-covered) customisation for various trade purposes straight from the factory.

For what it’s worth, I matched our test car in the configurator and ended up with a final price of $52,429 with drive-away pricing set to Sydney.

Out of curiosity, I also priced up a VW Caddy Cargo LWB petrol auto with as close as I could get to the same equipment as this Partner Premium, and was surprised to find I had to tick a lot more option boxes to get LED headlights, alloy wheels (although the Caddy alloys are larger at 17-inches), premium paint, colour matching body panels, keyless entry with push-start and a rubber floor mat.

The total price for the spec-matching Caddy came in at $57,952 drive-away in Sydney.

The Cannon's engine capacity has increased 20 per cent by adopting the Alpha's 2.4-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel. It produces 135kW of power at 3600rpm and 480Nm of torque between 1500-2500rpm, which represents a 12.5 per cent power increase and 20 per cent more torque.

This is paired with GWM’s new homegrown nine-speed torque converter automatic (previously eight-speed) which has overdrive on the top three ratios and there are steering wheel paddle-shifters for sequential manual-shifting.

The 4x4 system is a ‘torque on demand’ design that transmits power to the rear axle under normal driving conditions to optimise fuel economy, but automatically sends power to the front axle if a loss of rear axle traction is detected.

It also offers a choice of selectable drive modes comprising 'Normal' (default), 'Sport' and 'Eco', plus 4H (4x4 High Range) and 4L (4x4 Low Range). The latter is only for the rough stuff, where the selectable electronic rear diff-lock could also come in handy.

There is just one combustion engine option in the Partner range, a three-cylinder 1.2-litre turbocharged petrol unit producing 96kW/230Nm which drives the front wheels via an eight-speed automatic transmission.

The only alternative to this is the E-Partner which sports a 100kW/260Nm electric motor instead.

The three-cylinder petrol is a perky unit sourced from Peugeot’s passenger car line-up, although the Partner range doesn’t quite offer the VW Caddy’s breadth of options; the choice of a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol or a 2.0-litre diesel in two states of tune.

GWM claims official combined consumption of 8.4L/100km and the dash display was showing 9.6 at the completion of our 321km test, which comprised the usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving, of which about one third of that distance was hauling its maximum payload. The engine auto start/stop function was switched off for the duration.

Our own figure of 9.7L/100km, crunched from actual fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was line-ball with the Cannon’s onboard calculation, which proved its accuracy. It also validated our test vehicle’s real-world sub-10L/100km consumption, which is excellent for a two-tonne-plus ute and gets a big thumbs-up from us.

Therefore, based on our test figure, you could expect a real-world driving range of around 800km from its 78-litre diesel tank.

One of the key downsides of the Peugeot’s Euro-compliant turbo-petrol engine is it requires mid-shelf 95RON fuel, which could be a blow to those who want to drill down on running costs.

Claimed fuel consumption on the official combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle is decent, at 6.3L/100km. Ours spent the week mainly urban commuting and landed closer to the official urban number of 7.3L/100km with a total of 7.2L/100km over a few hundred kilometres.

The 60-litre fuel tank should allow for roughly 950km of driving range at the official consumption. More like 830km using our test figure.

Even though there’s no adjustment for base-cushion rake or lumber support on the driver’s seat, we didn’t suffer any discomfort during our test. There are also three steering wheel assist modes to choose from comprising 'Light', 'Comfort' (default) and 'Sport'.

The new 2.4-litre engine effectively fills the gap that existed with the previous 2.0-litre, which felt underdone given this vehicle's size and weight. The big 20 per cent increase in torque is a noticeable improvement, as it pulls strongly from low rpm with gearing that keeps it within its peak zone most of the time.

It’s also relatively smooth and quiet and the three drive modes optimise performance in each setting. The Sport mode provides a noticeable increase in response, which in combination with the same setting for the steering is the most engaging drive experience.

The refined nine-speed auto is a sweet-shifting transmission in either auto or manual mode.

We were also pleasantly surprised by a big improvement in ride and handling, as this latest version of the Cannon feels like it finally has the beefier spring rates and damper settings this ute has been crying out for.

It’s also an effortless highway cruiser, with the overdriven top gear ensuring the engine requires less than 1800rpm to maintain 110km/h. However, although wind and engine noise is pleasantly low at these speeds, we did notice tyre noise emanating from the rear tyres into the cabin.

To test its GVM rating, we maxed out the payload to 990kg. This compressed the rear leaf-springs about 60mm, leaving around 40mm of static bump-stop clearance which ensured no bottoming-out on our test route.

It felt stable and sure-footed and the new drivetrain made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h, displaying ample pulling power in fourth gear to easily haul this load to the summit.

Engine-braking on the way down, in a manually-selected second gear, was arguably the best we’ve experienced in a sub-3.0-litre turbo-diesel with almost a tonne on its back.

Our only gripe is the emergency lane-keeping assist function, which needs more refinement as it creates weird fluctuations in steering weight and aggressively tugs at the wheel when you get anywhere near a white line.

Fortunately, this can be disabled in the vehicle settings menu, but unfortunately must be switched off before each drive.

One thing which I always like about these little European vans for trades is they’re usually very humane and easy to drive compared to a dual-cab or a van in a larger market segment.

They tend to offer closer to the feel of a passenger car, with some of the little luxuries which are missing in big hollow diesel units like some form of refinement and less noise.

The Partner is no different, and shone in some ways I did not expect.

The brand has done a good job of making it feel like a Peugeot passenger car from a touch-point perspective with the dash elements and the small chuckable steering wheel.

It also has a swift steering ratio, making even this LWB version feel nimble and agile for darting around corners and down tight laneways just as I’m sure its French creators envisaged.

The peppy three-cylinder engine helps the hatch-like feel. It offers a punchy turbo surge and a satisfyingly gruff soundtrack, which makes this little commercial offering quite fun to drive.

The ride is also remarkably smooth for a commercial vehicle, even completely unladen. Car-like suspension handles the bumps and potholes of the city environment well, which could make this a good choice for delivery drivers who will spend a lot of time in urban environments, and maybe are less concerned about getting so close to the GCM rating.

However, it’s not quite as polished as the Caddy, which won me over big time when the fifth generation version arrived in 2022.

The Peugeot can suffer from significant bouts of turbo lag, and its eight-speed transmission can be occasionally jerky from a stand-still, making for the odd awkward moment at T-junctions and roundabouts where this van takes a second to get going again. 

Additionally, some of the fun, refined feeling wears away over time as you constantly come into contact with the hard plastic trims of the interior, and the scratchy urethane steering wheel.

This can get a bit jarring over a full day of driving. It’s for this reason VW puts a leather-bound steering wheel in even basic versions of the Caddy these days.

The software also leaves a lot to be desired, with minimal customisation and laggy interfaces.

Sure, the reality is you’ll spend most of your time working with Apple CarPlay or Android Auto which worked perfectly in my time with the car, but it would be nice to have more customisation for the dash and a few nicer menus for the multimedia screen.

All in all, then, it’s a nice little van to drive, and is excellent at urban duties, but it has a slightly industrial character which will eventually catch up with you after a long day behind the wheel.

The Caddy is better in pretty much every way behind the wheel, but then it also costs over $5000 more in equivalent spec and can't carry as much stuff.

Like all GWM Cannons, our test vehicle comes with a generous seven-year/unlimited km warranty, which includes five years of roadside assist. Apart from the first service at 12 months or 10,000km, scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km, whichever occurs first.

GWM offers capped-pricing for the first five scheduled services (60 months or 70,000km), which totals $2530, or an average of $506 per service.

The Partner is covered by a par-for-the-course five year and 200,000km warranty which applies to the rest of its light commercial range, paired with five years of roadside assistance. 

The Partner requires servicing once every 12 months or 15,000km.

When it comes to pricing, you can package the car up with either a two- or four-year service plan (priced at $400 or $1000, respectively) which Peugeot claims can save you up to $437 compared to a-la-carte servicing.