Ford F150 vs Suzuki Vitara

What's the difference?

This update to the F-150 is long overdue and while it does a lot to address previous faults, Ford is going to have a hard time winning back the public’s trust on this vehicle.

Given the pre-update car was subject to so many recalls and stop-sales, it’s hard to shake that somewhat tarnished reputation.

In saying that, the F-150 is arguably the pick out of its rivals. It’s bold with lots of nifty features, has acres of space, plenty of towing capabilities and is surprisingly efficient.

Just be prepared for your hip pocket nerve to ache when you see the price tag, especially if you opt for the flagship Platinum trim.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

The F-150 has a very typical, American pick-up silhouette. It’s boxy, large and long, especially in long-wheelbase guise.

The fundamentals of this pick-up's overall design have carried over but the update has helped to improve the visual appeal, especially at the front. It’s great to see LED headlights now feature as standard across the line-up.

XLT and Lariat trims still feature a lot of chrome highlighting which looks somewhat tacky in 2026.

Thankfully the new Platinum gets blacked-out accents instead, along with a slightly different front fascia which is more contemporary. However, I don’t know if this flagship version of the F-150 necessarily looks like it’s worth more than $160K.

Inside the design is more unified across the line-up. Notably the entry-level XLT finally picks up the larger 12.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system which fits the expansive dashboard better.

A 12.0-inch digital instrument cluster is also standard across the line-up now. Previously the XLT had analogue dials with a small screen sandwiched between.

Although there are a range of high-end and plush touches around the cabin, it’s harder to justify on the higher-end Platinum as there is a sea of black finishes. It would be nice to have some different finishes to create some more contrast.

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

The F-150 is an incredibly practical vehicle that has inherent American touches throughout. The most obvious are the front seats which are cushy and comfortable, though they’re very broad, meaning you can slide about on winding roads.

The driver’s seat offers plenty of electric adjustment across the line-up, while the Platinum adds a massage function that not only works on the backrest, but also the seat base. This feels a little weird on the move.

Ahead of the driver is a big and chunky steering wheel that feels substantial in the hand, plus there are large and obvious buttons that are easy to interact with.

This is complimented by the 12.0-inch digital instrument cluster which is clear, high-res and easy to understand. There are a range of different layouts and menus that you’re able to cycle through.

Moving across, the 12.0-inch touchscreen multimedia system is similarly high-res and has a user interface that’s clean and hard to get lost in thanks to the shortcut buttons at the bottom of the screen.

There’s wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as standard, along with satellite navigation.

When you adjust the front-seat lumbar or turn on the massage function, it takes over the entire touchscreen display. This isn’t ideal if the driver is trying to use the screen at the same time.

Looking around the cabin, it’s great to see so many physical buttons and switches for key functions, like the climate, media and four-wheel-drive controls. So many of these are now getting integrated into the touchscreen.

Like before, the F-150 XLT has a column-mounted gear selector, while the Lariat (and now the Platinum) gets an electronically folding gear selector. When folded, this allows you to fold out the centre console lid to create a desk-like space to work on.

In terms of storage, there is acres of it. Under the centre console is one of the biggest spaces I’ve ever seen in a new vehicle, plus there are two cupholders, large door bins, as well as dual gloveboxes on the passenger side. You’ll definitely find a place for all of your stuff.

The second row of the F-150 is incredibly spacious, even for adults, and regardless of which wheelbase option you choose, it stays the same. This is because the extra wheelbase length is specifically for the tub area.

At 182cm tall, I have oodles of legroom behind my own driving position, though headroom is a little tight in the F-150 Lariat and Platinum due to the panoramic glass sunroof.

You’ll easily fit three people across the rear bench seat, plus the floor is completely flat.

In terms of amenities, there are air vents on the back of the centre console, heated outboard seats (Lariat and Platinum only), a 12V socket, USB outlets, as well as cupholders galore on the centre console, door pockets and fold-down centre armrest.

At the back, the F-150 XLT retains a manual tailgate with a fold-out step ladder and while the Lariat and Platinum still have a power tailgate, they also pick up a new party trick.

There’s a new central section that’s side-hinging, allowing you to more easily access the tub from ground level. It’s a similar set-up to what GWM offers on the Cannon Alpha.

In the SWB, the tub measures 1700mm long, 1650mm wide (1285mm between the arches) and 543mm tall. The LWB gains 300mm of length, bringing the total tub length to 2000mm.

Payload varies depending on the wheelbase length and trim level. It has received a slight bump compared to the pre-update model, however it’s still only between 704kg and 878kg. The smaller Ranger, for example, overlooking the beefy Super Duty, has higher payload figures.

Where the regular Ranger can’t match the F-150 though is with its 4500kg braked towing capacity. This is something that has been addressed with the Ranger Super Duty.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

From $39,990 (all prices are drive-away unless stated otherwise), 2026’s cheapest Vitara, the Turbo Hybrid 2WD, seems provocatively expensive for an 11-year-old generation. And the all-wheel drive (AWD) model dubbed 'AllGrip' is a heady $46,000. Oof.

This puts the base Vitara’s price well above Chinese hybrid equivalents like the Haval Jolion HEV and MG ZS Hybrid+, about on a par with popular small-SUV hybrids including the Honda HR-V, Hyundai Kona and Toyota Corolla Cross, and in company with lower-spec petrol-powered iterations of the Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Seltos, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-30, Mitsubishi ASX, Mitsubishi Outlander, Nissan X-Trail, Renault Duster, Subaru Crosstrek, Skoda Kamiq, Volkswagen T-Cross and VW T-Roc.

Facing a lion’s den of fierce rivals is putting things mildly. The Vitara’s value struggles to stack up.

But consider this.

Back in 2015, the base Vitara cost $23K, drive-away – or $31.4K in 2026 money adjusted for inflation. However, that was for a 1.6-litre petrol manual; the auto added the equivalent of another $2.7K and the optional turbo that came soon after (dubbed 'BoosterJet' – and now standard equipment) cost another $6.8K, coming to $41K.

Huh. Suzuki isn’t being so delusionally greedy, then.

And that’s not taking in the latest model’s unique hybrid tech, extra safety of advanced driver-assist technologies (ADAS) such as autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert (RCTA), lane departure warning and blind-spot monitoring, or Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity, or a host of other extra features that have since been applied to an evolving Vitara over the years. Plus, import costs from Hungary are said to have skyrocketed.

If we compare what the 2026 Turbo Hybrid 2WD costs against the pre-facelift 2024 Turbo 2WD from $36,490, before on-road costs, the price rises aren’t nearly as bad as they seem (though runout ’24-build models are currently being promoted at $34,590, drive-away).

So, what else does your $40K-plus Vitara Turbo Hybrid give you?

Not much compared to most of the competition listed earlier. Climate control, rear privacy glass, LED automatic headlights, cloth upholstery, adaptive cruise control, a 7.0-inch touchscreen, reversing camera, 17-inch alloy wheels and flat paint are bare minimum at this price point.

Metallic paint demands another $745 if the standard white isn’t your bag.

Stretching to the $45,990 AWD adds a panoramic sunroof, 9.0-inch touchscreen, six instead of four speakers, extra driving modes, synthetic leather trim and two extra modish colours – beige or grey-blue that are also available with a two-tone black combo for an extra $1345.

The Vitara is over a decade old, but costs new-model money, lacks features found in rivals costing thousands less and only allows for a five-year warranty when some others offer up to 10.

Obama was US President when this Suzuki launched. The world it finds itself in today seems almost unrecognisable.

Although there are a wide range of other engine options available in the US, including hybrid and V8s, the sole engine available in Australia continues to be a 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 petrol. It produces 298kW and 678Nm which is competitive among its rivals.

This is mated to a 10-speed automatic transmission as standard with drive sent through a four-wheel-drive system The XLT gets a part-time system with a shift-on-the-fly function, whereas the Lariat and Platinum get a full-time system which allows for ‘4A’ functionality on sealed surfaces.

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

Ford claims the F-150 consumes an average of 13.4L/100km, according to ADR 81/02 testing. During our testing on regional and rural roads at the launch we recorded between 11-12.5/100km, which is surprisingly good for a ute this big.

There’s a mammoth 136L fuel tank as standard. Using the claimed fuel consumption this means the F-150 can theoretically travel more than 1000km on a tank.

A minimum of 91 RON regular unleaded petrol is required.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

Although the F-150 retains the same 3.5-litre twin-turbo V6 engine as the pre-update model, this is no bad thing as it’s a sweet and perky unit with plenty of rolling acceleration.

It gets this large, lumbering pick-up moving with no problems and makes you wonder why you wanted a V8 engine in the first place.

In the Lariat and Platinum some fake engine noise is pumped into the cabin through the speakers. I don’t hate it as it adds an almost V8-like gargle to the note.

Like before there’s a 10-speed automatic transmission which has a lot of ratios to choose from and sometimes can take a beat to kick down if you punch the accelerator harder.

It also feels like the transmission is constantly changing gears when you’re accelerating and as a result it almost sounds like a vehicle equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

In saying this though, the transmission is just keeping the engine within its torque band so acceleration is punchier.

With this update Ford was required to change the steering rack fitted to the locally converted F-150. Previously it was a Ranger unit and while Ford hasn’t detailed what the new steering rack is, it said it’s an amalgamation of existing Ford parts.

It’s hard to say definitively how different the steering feels from the pre-update model without driving them back to back, however, it does feel just a touch heavier than before. This isn’t bad as the F-150 is a big unit and it makes steering feel more substantial.

While you may be lulled at times into thinking this is just an overgrown Ranger on the open road, if you start driving with more intent and on twisty roads, this is far from a dynamic car. It also fills the lane quite generously, leaving minimal space between the painted lines.

The suspension, especially at the front end, is rather American and feels floaty, taking multiple movements to settle over bumps or undulations.

Thankfully this is where the flagship F-150 Platinum’s adaptive dampers come to save the day. In the Tow/Haul and Sport drive modes, the dampers are stiffened to create a more compliant ride and in reality they do iron out road imperfections better.

I particularly like how the ride in the Sport drive mode feels from behind the wheel, however there’s no way to split out the Sport suspension from the Sport engine calibration. This means you’re always driving around with the revs flared.

I wish there was a custom drive mode where you could pick and choose the engine, transmission and suspension calibrations. This would be a game changer for F-150 Platinum buyers.

In terms of towing, it’s the F-150’s bread and butter. With a 4500kg braked towing capacity, you can tow virtually anything without the pick-up breaking a sweat.

The Tow/Haul drive mode makes it feel even easier, plus having the Pro Trailer back-up assist takes the hard work out of reversing with a trailer.

Around town and even out on the highway, the F-150 is an incredibly quiet and serene car to drive, despite its heft. The transmission usually opts for the highest gear possible and you can barely hear it whirring away under the bonnet.

Surprisingly there’s barely any wind or tyre noise present in the cabin. Ford seems to have done an excellent job at insulating the F-150.

The only note I’ll make is the lack of noise makes you pick up on minor interior creaks and rattles more obviously. This isn’t ideal in a brand-new car.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

Back in 2015, the Vitara scored a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test rating, but it hasn’t been tested since and that result expired in December, 2022.

Both models come with the expected level of ADAS tech, including AEB, RCTA, lane departure warning, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitor, traffic sign recognition, auto high beam and adaptive cruise control.

There is no data on the operation parameters of the latest AEB system, but previous models operated from above 30km/h while the RCTA functions from 8.0km/h.

Six airbags (dual front, side and curtain) are also featured, along with two outboard rear-seat ISOFIX points and a trio of top tethers for child seats.

The F-150 is covered by a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty which is fairly average now for mainstream brands, however in the world of American pick-ups this is still generous.

There’s also 12 months of complimentary roadside assistance which gets extended every time you service the car when required.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. 

You can purchase a five-year pre-paid service package for $1968, which averages out to just under $400 per service.

This is considerably better than its rivals which typically don’t offer any form of capped-price servicing.

Ford has an expansive dealer network across urban, regional and rural Australia. It currently has around 180 sites.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.