Volvo C40 vs Kia EV6

What's the difference?

The C40 becomes a compelling option in the electrified small SUV space, offering a premium look and feel, great range and tech inclusions at the price, as well as awesome on-road dynamics.

Its main downsides are the rear seat, which is compromised by its platform and design-led roofline, and the overwhelming power and added traction of the dual-motor makes the single motor less attractive on the value front.

Still, regardless of variant chosen, the C40 looks to offer a stand-out balance of price, range, and performance, against its traditional rivals and newcomers alike.

It’s fair to say the Kia EV6 is not the most affordable mid-to-large electric SUV money can buy. Especially in the era of cheaper Chinese models.

It also lacks some of the practicalities of a few rivals. If that’s your focus and you’re dead set on buying a Kia, then the EV5 is the clear choice.

But that’s not the sole purpose of this car.

It doubles as family transport and a car for driving enthusiasts. It’s the sort of EV that can convert EV non-believers.

After a week with the EV6, it’s not a car I’ll forget easily. And I urge buyers looking in the EV space not to overlook this pioneering model. It’s a brilliant car to drive and the GT-Line RWD is the value pick of the whole line-up.

Volvo has become a brand with a distinctive and consistent design language which embodies the kind of beautiful minimalism normally associated with Scandinavian brands.

I have always liked how Volvo says more with less design elements, with only gentle touches of chrome or gloss black, and a lack of over-the-top sporty pieces avoiding the temptation to over-sell the sporty potential of the brand’s range.

The C40 takes the small SUV formula, well established by its XC40 relation, and gets a bit weird and experimental. It’s slightly lower and has a more coupe-styled rear, with a strongly raked rear window giving it a sportier and more aggressive look than the rest of Volvo’s SUV range.

The styling is sold by an angular spoiler piece running atop the boot, and the rear light clusters have gone all minimalist, constructed of individual pieces rather than a single transparent housing, and they give a nod to the C30 hatchback which this car is the spiritual successor to, by name and nature.

The interior offers up no surprises, sticking to the formula Volvo has established across all of its current models. An effortlessly premium space with, again, a minimalistic dash dominated by the portrait touchscreen, the C40’s premium nature is confirmed by its finely patterned inlays, simple chrome pieces, and abundance of soft-touch surfaces.

The big upright vent fittings with clever rhomboid patterns on their adjustment dials are always a highlight piece of modern Volvos, and the pattern work is continued on the central volume adjust dial and even on the little rotating pieces of the light and wiper stalks. Clever.

Even the software is paired back on the multimedia suite and digital dashboard, with easy to use shortcuts and simple menus which suit the car.

Volvo might turn off some buyers with the more unconventional shape of the C40. But for those looking for a more traditional SUV it also offers the XC40 in the same two variants, and the Polestar 2 caters to those not looking for an SUV at all.

When I first saw the Kia EV6, I have to admit I wasn’t a massive fan of the design. I was, and still am, a massive fan of the mechanically related Hyundai Ioniq 5. Perhaps one of the many reasons that model won Best Medium SUV Under $130,000 at the 2026 CarsGuide Car of the Year Awards!

But the 2026 facelift has given me a renewed appreciation of the Kia’s design.

The overall shape is the same but the front, which was arguably its least appealing angle, has been redesigned.

It’s 15mm longer thanks to the new front bumper design, and it has adopted a completely new headlight signature that's in keeping with the EV3, EV4, EV5 and EV9. The front looks meaner, more aggressive, but in a really hot way.

There’s also a new bumper at the rear but the tail-lights are pretty much the same.

Overall it’s a much sharper look, helping to breathe new life into the EV6.

The visual changes are more subtle inside, but it was already a nice cabin to begin with. The big changes include the new version of Kia’s dual-screen set-up which is more modern and centred than the previous version, and there’s more visually appealing graphics.

The other key change is the steering wheel. For GT-Line and GT grades, Kia’s dropped the polarising two-spoke wheel in favour of a sportier and more premium three-spoke, dual-tone wheel found in other models, including the EV3. The base Air retains the two-spoke wheel.

The C40 is essentially a XC40 with a cropped down roofline, and there are some obvious downsides which this new shape brings.

The front seat throws no surprises, though, offering plenty of room for two adults with a welcome level of adjustability for the seat and wheel. The seats could be more comfortable, though, with a notable lack of padding in the base compared to some luxury (or even non-luxury) rivals. 

I’m a fan of the fabric trim which comes on both grades, bucking the trend of needing to have leather or leather-like trim for a car to feel ‘premium’.

The ample window space up front, including the massive glass roof helps the C40’s cabin feel spacious, but the view out the rear with its aggressive design is all but a very limited letterbox aspect, particularly if the rear seat headrests are in the upright position. 

While some controls are exclusively via touch interface, there is a physical volume dial, and shortcut buttons for the defogger functions. 

Temperature is controlled by touch, however, and the detail settings have some smaller toggle adjustments. Tricky to jab at when you’re on the move.

The digital dash is refreshingly simple, but minimally adjustable, with the choice of either a nifty navigation screen, a blank screen, or trip details being the only options.

Cabin storage is good but not stellar. There are bottle holders and big pockets in the doors, a set of two cupholders in the centre (beats the Polestar 2’s single cupholder), a small tray with a wireless charger under the multimedia screen, and a smallish console armrest box.

The rear seat is where the real problem exists. Unlike the XC40, the C40’s cropped roofline means my head was hard up against the roof (I’m 182cm tall). 

I did have decent knee room behind my own seating position, however the seat comfort in the back still isn’t as good as some rivals. 

The middle position is also compromised, thanks to the raised centre floor piece the C40’s platform needs to facilitate all-wheel drive in its combustion relations.

A bottle holder appears in each door pocket, and in a rare inclusion, there are heated outboard rear seats, adjustable air vents, and USB-C charging ports.

The boot has a quoted capacity of 413 litres with the rear seats up. The floor is comparatively high suggesting a smallish space when loaded with luggage cases, for instance. Stay tuned for a follow-up review so we can see how well it holds our three-piece demo set.

The floor itself has an adjustable, pop-up divider and multiple luggage hooks, making it quite versatile, and there is a cavity beneath which can hold your charging cables as well as the inflator kit in place of a spare wheel.

Under Australia’s vehicle categorisation, the Kia EV6 is classed as a large SUV. Which is not correct. Yes, it’s long and wide but it isn’t large. It’s medium. Also, is it an SUV? Or is it a low-slung coupe-style fastback? Perhaps a bit of both.

The EV6 has a decent amount of space in the cabin, but family-friendly practically might not be its strongest suit.

In the front row, headroom is limited. The sunroof is partly to blame for this, but the EV6’s front seats have always felt a little cramped for taller folks. Finding my perfect driving position took a bit longer as a result. Popping your sunglasses on your head is a no-no for a six footer like me. There is, however, plenty of space across the front of the cabin.

The front seats offer excellent upper body bolstering but could do with a little more for the thighs. But they are delightfully comfortable and look gorgeous.

The elevated centre console provides a high-set armrest and under that is a massive central bin, then there is a huge amount of open space underneath.

It houses two shallow and narrow cupholders with a phone charger, gear shifter, vehicle on/off and seat/steering wheel heating buttons. Yay buttons!

Climate control is managed via a digital panel separate to the main screen. It features smart dials that switch between air con and audio and sat-nav controls. Speaking of which, the air con flow is excellent.

Kia’s updated multimedia system brings it into line with other newer models. It’s a pleasure to use this system. Large tiles drill down into logical sub-menus, you can swipe every which way and the resolution is excellent. It’s also easy to navigate.

There are three USB-C charge ports under the centre stack.

Taller passengers might need to duck their head when getting in the second row, due to the lower sloping roofline. Once seated, the EV6 features that quirk of some older EVs where the rear seats are heavily bucketed and your knees sit up high because of the positioning of the under-floor battery. A lot of newer EVs keep the rear footwell free of battery packs to ensure more foot room and a more comfortable rear-seat experience.

There’s heaps of leg room behind my seating position, and headroom isn’t bad back there. It’s certainly better than the front. I had about 2.0cm between my head and the roof liner.

It feels a little dark back there due to the high window line, privacy glass and small rear window.

The rear seats are comfy but on the firmer side. There’s a fold-down arm rest with two shallow cupholders, and a small bottle will fit in the door.

You get two map pockets, USB-C ports on the back of both front seats, and chest-level side air vents.

You can lower the 60/40 split rear seats via a lower lever on the seat base. They fold almost flat, too. You can also lower the seats via a lever in the boot which is a handy feature.

The EV6 Air RWD’s boot can swallow 490 litres of cargo, and that drops to 480L for all other grades.

The boot area allows for a decent amount of usable space but the sloping tailgate means you won’t fit tall items.

Under-floor storage is limited but could easily fit flatter items like a charging cable. It also houses the tyre repair kit which is sadly what you get instead of any form of spare wheel. The boot also has a number of bag hooks, speakers and a light.

A front storage compartment under the bonnet can take 52 litres in the RWD grades, dropping to 20L in AWD versions.

One of the challenges for Kia and the EV6 is price and positioning. In the four years since its launch, the price of EVs of a comparable size has come down considerably.

You can get a medium-to-large electric SUV in the low-$40K range these days from one of a number of new Chinese players.

But not many of those cars have the same focus on driveability as the EV6.

Wisely, Kia has kept prices essentially as they were as part of the 2026 facelift. Each grade has only gone up by $70 apiece.

The EV6 kicks off with the Air RWD (rear-wheel drive, single motor) from $72,660, before on-road costs. The GT-Line RWD (the grade I will focus on for this review) costs $79,660 and the GT-Line AWD (all-wheel drive, dual motor) is $87,660 - an $8000 jump from the RWD.

It tops out at $99,660 for the performance-honed GT.

This pricing puts the EV6 somewhere between the new crop of affordable EVs like the BYD Sealion 7, Zeekr 7X and more premium offerings like the BMW iX3 or Audi Q4 etron.

It’s closer in price to another sporty EV, the Cupra Tavascan ($60,990-$82,490), as well as the Kia’s mechanical cousin, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 ($76,200-$115,000).

The facelift ushers in new standard gear including fresh 19 to 21-inch alloy wheel designs, vehicle-to-load (V2L) functionality, new twin 12.3-inch driver and multimedia screens, updated software with enhanced graphics, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto (it was previously wired) and over-the-air updates.

Other standard gear in the base Air includes reclining rear seatbacks, synthetic leather seats, manual front seat adjustment, five USB-C ports, a wireless phone charger, a retractable cargo cover, six-speaker audio, digital radio and dual-zone climate control.

The GT-Line RWD I am testing adds a 14-speaker Meridian audio system, heated and ventilated front seats, a heated steering wheel, ambient lighting, alloy sports pedals, a sunroof, hands-free power tailgate, eight-way power driver and front passenger seats, synthetic black suede/white leather seats and remote park assist.

The flagship GT gains special sports bucket seats, two more USB-C ports in the rear, heated rear seats and a bigger dollop of performance.

When you look at the base pricing compared to the fully-loaded standard kit of the more affordable EVs, it doesn’t look like great value. But the GT-Line RWD is the pick of the EV6 grades as it isn’t missing much. You could also argue the overall build quality, gripping performance (more on that in the Driving section), reliability and Kia’s extensive dealer network is worth the extra spend.

Great news here, the C40 can be chosen with two powerful layouts, either a front-wheel drive 170kW/330Nm set-up, or a dual-motor all-wheel drive arrangement, able to make use of nearly double the power at 300kW/660Nm. The dual-motor is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 4.7 seconds.

The front-drive is backed by a 69kWh battery allowing it a 434km range, while the dual motor ups the battery size to 78kWh to allow a 420km driving range.

The EV6 has a range of powertrains depending on the grade. The Air and GT-Line RWD have a single motor set-up offering 168kW of power and 350Nm of torque, and the GT-Line AWD dual-motor pumps out 239kW and 605Nm.

Kia has boosted power in the high-performance GT by 18 kilowatts to a bonkers 448kW.

These figures are higher than some cheaper rivals and on par with other similarly priced EVs.

The 0-100km/h sprint time for the rear-drive grades is 7.7 seconds, dropping to 5.3 seconds for the GT-Line AWD, while the GT can do it in a blistering 3.5 seconds when engaging Launch Control.

Surprisingly, energy consumption is quite high for both C40 variants. The single motor is the more efficient of the two, consuming 16.8kWh/100km on the more lenient ADR testing schedule, while the dual motor officially consumes 22.2kWh/100km to the same standard. I saw around 23kWh/100km overall in my short test of the dual-motor variant.

Energy consumption could be better for both, as I have achieved more consistently impressive results particularly from Hyundai and Kia electric cars.

Where the C40 is more impressive though is its charging specs, which are exactly where they need to be for a car this size. On a rapid DC charger, the C40 can charge at a rate of 150kW meaning a 10 - 80 percent charge in 40 minutes for the dual motor, or 32 minutes for the single motor.

On the slower AC standard, the C40 charges at a rate of 11kW. Expect a 10 - 80 percent charge time of around five or six hours on this standard. 

The C40 uses a European-standard Type 2 CCS charging port, although it misses out on the handy two-way charging feature offered by some rivals.

All EV6 grades get a bigger under-floor lithium-ion battery, up from the 77.4 kilowatt hour unit in the previous model to 84kWh.

Driving range is up more than 50km in rear-wheel drive variants to 582km in the Air and 560km in the GT-Line, according to the WLTP testing cycle.

The GT-Line AWD’s range is now 522km (up from 484km), and the range-topping dual-motor GT offers 450km of range - a 26km increase.

All EV6 grades have vehicle-to-load charging via a port under the rear seating row or by using an extender for the external CCS Type 2 charging port.

Maximum DC charging is 10.5kW but the EV6 supports AC charging infrastructure up to 400 and 800 volts.

Using a 50kW fast charger should take 80 minutes to get from 10 to 80 per cent full, while a 350kW charger takes 18 minutes. Slow AC charging at home with three-phase power should take about seven-and-a-half hours.

Official energy consumption varies between grades. The Air RWD is 15.9kWh/100km, GT-Line RWD is 16.9kWh, GT-Line AWD is 17.7kWh and GT is 20.9kWh.

The car’s trip computer recorded an efficiency figure of 19.1kW/h when I handed it back, but I engaged in some enthusiastic driving. Factoring in the usable battery capacity (80kWh), the EV6 GT-Line RWD’s theoretical range is 473km.

It has multi-mode regenerative braking that is exceptionally smooth, including one-pedal driving, various EV sounds to choose from and a utility mode function to save battery life.

There’s even a soft close function for the charge flap that’s integrated nicely in the driver’s side rear tail-light.

If you’ve driven any kind of XC40 or even a Polestar 2 before, the C40 will offer no surprises. It’s pretty much exactly the same from behind the wheel with a few subtle tweaks.

This is a very good thing. The C40 is quiet, easy to drive, and its electric motor and regen system offer a smooth single-pedal experience.

It is also alarmingly, overwhelmingly, rapid. While its massive set of batteries under the floor make it feel heavy off the line in stop-start traffic, sticking your boot into the accelerator will remove any doubt, particularly in the dual-motor variant, that this Volvo means business.

The dual-motor also has an incredible torque-vectoring system, making it extremely difficult to elicit so much as a squeak from its tyres. It also feels as though torque is distributed quite evenly between its two driven axles, making it feel neither prone to over- or understeer.

This has the effect of making the C40 feel somewhat indestructible in the corners, with absurd levels of grip. 

The same feeling is present in top-spec versions of the Polestar 2, only the feeling of ever-present weight is more noticeable in the higher-riding C40, which can make it unsettling to take corners at the kinds of speeds it is capable of.

The steering tune is interesting. Volvo offers two software-controlled modes, either heavy or standard, and the standard mode is heavy enough. 

Despite its electrical assistance, the wheel does continue to offer some organic feedback, making the C40 a pleasure to steer on countryside roads.

The ride is also surprisingly good, despite massive wheel options. I was impressed how easily the C40 handled most bumps and undulations, communicating little to the cabin. 

The ride can approach its limits with such big wheels and the weight of its batteries, generally these are communicated via unsettling thuds from underneath the car. Regular undulations at higher speeds also had the C40 bouncing around a little.

On the whole, though, the cabin is kept relatively insulated and serene, adding an element of total confidence, similar to that offered by Teslas, whilst offering better ride quality with a softer edge. At higher speed, at least on the 20-inch wheels, road noise does pick up, however.

In terms of electric driving, there is a single adjustable setting for regen. The car either offers a full single pedal mode with maximum regenerative braking to bring the car to a halt with the motor alone, or a ‘standard’ mode which tones the regen down and offers it blended in via the brake pedal. 

Single pedal mode is more efficient. I suggest you stick to it if you want to make the most of this car’s efficiency.

I was surprised to have so few complaints about the C40’s drive experience. This is a balanced and capable EV which is yet another example of how even vehicles which use combustion platforms are improved out of sight by full electrification.

This is where the EV6 excels. There’s a lot more competition out there now, but the good news is the EV6 still impresses on the road.

I am purely focusing on the GT-Line RWD for this section as it’s the grade I had for a week.

It’s not brutally quick from a standing start, but it offers a nice, linear build up of speed. It adds speed quite quickly when at pace and this is more than enough poke for most people.

If you are intent on more power and speed, but without stretching to the GT flagship, the GT-Line AWD might be your cup of Jarrah. Although that is an $8000 premium over the RWD.

If you want to save the cash the RWD has drive modes ('Eco', 'Normal', 'Sport', 'Snow', 'MyDrive'), so you can add some spice with Sport mode.

The EV6’s precise steering has a little weight to it and good feedback.

On dynamically engaging roads the EV6 doesn’t feel its two-tonne weight. It has loads of grip when you lean into a corner and remains flat through the twisty stuff. There’s the tiniest hint of lateral movement in the car but there’s a lack of top-heavy body roll.

Thanks to the rear-wheel drive configuration, it’s also playful. The rear flicked out briefly when turning in wet conditions, but otherwise the stability control keeps everything in check.

This car has clearly been engineerd by driving enthusiasts for driving enthusiasts.

The ride quality is a little jittery on uneven roads. It’s not cushy like the EV5. You will feel tram/train tracks, potholes and random bumps. I detected a little vibration through the steering wheel on crumby roads. The Continental Premium Contact 6 (255/45 R20) tyres have a decent sidewall but they can’t soak up everything.

As well as being dynamically excellent, it’s also a lovely cruiser on smooth freeways and roads.

Other related points - it has a large turning circle (11.6m) and visibility is impeded by enormous B- and C-pillars, small rear windows and a middle-seat headrest.

The EV6 doesn’t gain anything too new from a safety perspective with this update but it comes standard with the usual driver aids like auto emergency braking with car, pedestrian, cyclist and junction turning, lane keep assist, ‘Lane Following Assist’, blind-spot collision warning and assist with rear cross-traffic alert and assist, safe exit warning, multi-collision braking, adaptive cruise control, a speed limiter, reversing camera and front and rear parking sensors.

The lane keeping aid tugs a little at the wheel and it subtly moves the car to the left line marking on motorways, but it’s not too intrusive.

There are seven airbags including a side centre airbag, three top tether anchors and two ISOFIX points.

The EV6 was awarded a maximum five-star rating from ANCAP back in 2022 and that rating should carry over until it expires at the end of 2028.

As with any modern Kia - or Hyundai and Genesis for that matter - I turn off a bunch of the driver aids as soon as I get behind the wheel to ensure I remain sane. Thankfully, there is a configurable favourite button (a star) on the steering wheel that takes you straight to the driver safety menu, otherwise you have to dig through multiple menus.

I turn off the infuriating overspeed warning and the driver attention alert every single time I drive this car because they are so deeply annoying.

If safety features are too distracting to leave on, are they really safe?

The C40 is covered by Volvo’s five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with a separate eight-year, 160,000km warranty for the battery. There is also eight years of roadside assistance attached.

It is pleasing to see the service intervals for the C40 are long, as they should be for an electric car with so few moving parts, set at two years or 30,000km. 

The first 24 month service is free of charge, and Volvo tells us service pricing after this period will average out to around $100 a year ($200 per visit).

The EV6 is covered by Kia’s solid seven year/unlimited kilometre warranty and it has a battery warranty of seven years or 150,000 kilometres, whichever occurs first.

The service schedule is every 12 months or 15,000km.

Kia offers service plans of three, five and seven years with pricing for Air and GT-Line of $728 for three years, $1391 for five years and $2055 for seven years.

The GT is a little pricer at $842, $1570 and $2319, respectively.

This pricing isn’t astronomical, but it is more expensive than the Cupra Tavascan and MG IM6.

Kia has 147 dealerships across the country covering metro, urban and rural areas and all of them service EVs.