Volkswagen T-ROC vs Audi Q3

What's the difference?

So that’s the T-Roc, a bit of Euro style that’s still priced to take the fight to some small SUVs from Japan or Korea.

Is it the cheapest style-forward small SUV you can get? No, but it’s far from the expensive end of things.

Plus, if you can resist ticking some option boxes, it beats some value-focused rivals and looks good doing it.

If the feeling of a sturdy fit-out and a confidence inspiring drive is important to you, I reckon the T-Roc should be an entry on your shopping list.

So is this new Q3 good enough to remain Audi’s number one choice? In a word, yes.

Audi has resisted the temptation that some brands fall into by making too many changes to a proven sales performer. This new Q3 isn’t radically different from the old Q3, but it has improved in almost every way.

It isn’t different enough to widely expand its appeal to a new wave of customers, but there’s no reason it won’t remain Audi’s most popular choice for the foreseeable future.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The T-Roc subtly stands out without being garish, avoiding becoming part of the highway or suburban camouflage without relying on extreme design decisions.

For example, the LED daytime running lights that wrap around the shapes below the LED 'I.Q' headlights where vents would otherwise be on the R performance variant are quite cute.

In fact, the whole front end of this small SUV has a friendly look, even if there’s nothing specific that’s particularly exciting about it.

This 'Petroleum Blue Metallic' colour is a $700 option, but anything other than white costs extra.

However, the black roof two-tone look is a standard for the Style, as are the black mirror caps and its 18-inch alloys.

There are roof rails up top, tinted privacy windows for rear passengers and for the rear window and a sloping roofline at the rear that adds a touch of ‘sport’ to the silhouette along with a small spoiler at the top.

The brief to the designers was seemingly pretty simple - don’t mess with a good thing.

According to the company, they want it to be recognisable as an Audi from 100m away, but at the same time, it makes sense not to make any radical changes to a design that is clearly a hit with buyers.

There’s still a new grille, which is slightly larger, while the daytime running lights (DRLs) are now mounted high, on the top corners of the front fascia.

Audi prides itself on its lights and the Q3 features multi-segment DRLS, with dynamic light effects, plus the rear badge lights up red with the tail-lights are turned on.

Digital matrix LEDs are available as an option on the quattro grades, which is a first for such a small Audi. While based on the technology already deployed in the bigger, more expensive Audi models, this is an updated system with micro LED matrix capabilities that are better able to light up the road ahead without blinding cars ahead or oncoming.

One very noticeable element to the design of this new Q3 is the size - which hasn’t really changed. Audi has resisted the temptation that so many brands have to upsize a compact model and has instead retained the same size that buyers clearly find appealing. It is slightly longer, approximately 4cm, but is still unmistakably a Q3 in looks and size.

Inside the Q3 is a different story, with the designers clearly empowered to create more change. The elements remain similar, but there have been more dramatic changes compared to the exterior to keep the Q3 looking contemporary and luxurious.

For example, there are still two large screens, just like the old model, but the virtual cockpit and multimedia screen are integrated into the dashboard together and more prominently, moving higher up the centre fascia.

It works well, as the interior looks and feels premium, and very much an Audi, albeit on a smaller scale.

To cap it off there are four interior colour packages to choose from, plus four different choices for the inlays, including two real wood options and an aluminium trim.

Inside the T-Roc is a bit of an interesting dichotomy.

Some of what’s in here is ‘old-gen’ Volkswagen stuff, but it still holds up today against even some recently introduced models.

The dichotomy is that while it’s very usable and slick, some of its materials and surfaces let it down a touch.

The good points are that the cabin tech is a perfect level of physical and digital. The buttons and controls are easy to use and feel solid and even though the climate controls could be more physical, they’re still good as far as touch panel style controls go.

The older VW gear is arguably better than a lot of what’s found in newer models where some use of touchscreens and haptic panels has drawn negative feedback from customers.

The multimedia software managed via the 8.0-inch touchscreen is more simple and sensible than the new version, plus the Digital Cockpit Pro display for the driver is clear and, importantly, customisable. It’s a similar cockpit system that used to seem quite impressive in high-end Audis.

But what doesn’t feel very high-end is some of the plastic and the decisions around function in the rest of the space.

The leather on the seats is not a cheap option box to tick at $3450, but it feels a little cheap to the touch. It’s a tad hard and even has a bit of a rough look to it.

That option also makes them heated and electrically adjustable, though, which is welcome in winter. Otherwise, cloth seats without the optional leather or heating would be absolutely fine, and that means you get a storage space under them, too.

This central space between the driver and front passenger, too, is a little awkward with the cupholder placement. It’s behind the shifter meaning a tall bottle will be in the way and it’s got slightly odd sizing for bottles or cups with nothing to stop them wobbling.

I am, however, a fan of the angled-away phone slot under the climate controls to minimise phone screen visibility (and distraction) and the traditional shifter itself is welcome.

Look up, and (in our test car) there’s an optional ($2000) panoramic sunroof there. It’s yours if you want it, and it does have an electric blind, but some Japanese and Korean cars at this price point get that as standard.

An average-sized adult will find the second row is spacious enough and relatively comfortable. There’s an armrest, dual-directional vents and two USB-C ports.

Behind that, boot space is generous at 445L with the seats up thanks to an adjustable floor, which is very useful for tall items and even manages to fit a space saver spare tyre under it.

It’s a total of 1290L with the split-fold seats down, too, though they’re not super flat with the adjustable floor down.

The biggest change to the interior is the technology, with a new multimedia interface with new, larger tiles as well as new ‘Control Unit’ for the key driving functions.

The ‘Virtual Cockpit’ display is much simpler, with a nice, clean look, plus the option to have the satellite image on the screen, whether you’re in navigation or not. The multimedia screen is a good size (12.8 inches) and the menus are easy to navigate. The decision not to have physical controls for the climate control is disappointing, but thankfully there is a volume/on-off dial for the sound system.

The most notable difference is the so-called ‘control unit’ that integrates the indicators, wipers and gear selector on a single ‘bar’ mounted to the steering column. It’s another example of modern cars reinventing something we’ve all become accustomed to, but after a day of driving it quickly becomes second nature to adapt to the slightly different controls.

While it may be the same size, Audi has managed to find more room inside, particularly the rear, by redesigning the door pockets and sculpting out the seat backs. It’s still not the roomiest cabin, but the rear seats will be fine for younger families, couples and singles.

Another plus is the 40:20:40 split/fold rear seats for maximum practicality and adaptability, while all three have child seat anchor points (although if you do have three small children, I wouldn’t be recommending an SUV this size). 

As for the boot, because Audi only measures to the top of the seats, it measures 488L in both the SUV and Sportback variants, so you’re not missing out on day-to-day practicality with the sportier-looking roof. However, if you drop the rear seats the cargo capacity expands to 1386L in the SUV but only 1289L in the Sportback.

A key to the popularity of the Q3 is the variety of choices available to customers. By offering a mixture of variants at different price points and with different levels of performance expands the appeal of the Q3 to as many potential buyers as possible. To that end there are no less than 10 variants to choose from, and that’s just for now, with more likely to join in the future.

At this stage the range includes both SUV and Sportback body styles, the choice of a 110kW, 150kW or 195kW engine with front- or all-wheel drive (or quattro, as Audi calls it). While still not confirmed, both a plug-in hybrid and a high-performance RS Q3 are both likely additions sometime in the future.

Starting with the 110kW model, standard equipment includes 18-inch alloy wheels, adaptive LED headlights, ambient interior lighting, keyless entry and ignition, leather-appointed upholstery and a 10-speaker sound system. The 110kW SUV is priced from $61,600 and the Sportback from $64,600.

Moving up to the 150kW quattro variant adds adaptive dampers, which the 195kW models also get, as well as 19-inch alloy wheels, and there’s an optional premium Sonos system for the more powerful models and a panoramic glass sunroof and a head-up display as part of a $4400 option package. Pricing for the 150kW begins at $70,200 for the SUV and $72,700 for the Sportback, while the 195kW is priced from $81,900 (SUV) and $84,400 (Sportback).

There’s also a Launch Edition available which adds between $5400 and $4400 to the price (depending on variant), but includes the S line exterior styling package, black exterior highlights, metallic paint, red brake callipers, a sound actuator and adaptive dampers. As the name implies, these are only available for launch of the new model, so will only be produced for the first two months.

It should also be noted that standard 110kW models won’t arrive until mid-year, once the factory in Europe is done producing the Launch Edition variants.

The engine in the T-Roc - as with most Volkswagens - does what it says on the tin. Essentially, a 110TSI means there’s 110kW of turbocharged VW happening, in this case a 1.4-litre four-cylinder that also makes 250Nm of torque.

It’s paired to an eight-speed torque converter, which will be music to the ears of those who have been scorned by older VW dual-clutches.

It drives the front wheels only, and there’s no hybridisation or 48-volt system.

As mentioned above, there are three powertrains to choose from initially, with talk of a plug-in hybrid and hi-po RS Q3 just that (talk) for now.

The entry-level SUV and Sportback get a new 1.5-litre four-cylinder mild-hybrid, turbocharged petrol engine, which makes 110kW/250Nm and sends all that performance to the road via the front wheels through a seven-speed, dual-clutch automatic transmission.

Next up is the TFSI 150kW quattro, which is a bigger 2.0L turbo-petrol four-cylinder, producing (you guessed it) 150kW and 320Nm. It also has a seven-speed dual clutch but also unsurprisingly has a quattro, aka all-wheel drive.

Finally there’s the TFSI 195kW quattro, which has the same engine but tuned to make 195kW and 400Nm, also with the seven-speed, dual-clutch auto and all-wheel drive.

This is naturally the quickest Q3, at least until the RS Q3 arrives, taking just 5.7 seconds to accelerate 0-100km/h, compared to 9.1 seconds for the 110kW and 7.1 seconds for the 150kW.

A lack of electrification in a relatively small engine and a traditional drivetrain shouldn't scare you too much, in this case.

Combined cycle fuel consumption is a claimed 6.3L/100km. On test in mostly urban areas or for spirited driving we saw the fuel use rise a little higher than that but not by as much as you might think.

After a mix of primarily urban, some highway and a stint of dynamic test driving, the trip computer admitted to a figure of 8.1L/100km.

While it may only be a mild hybrid, Audi has done its best to make the TFSI 110kW as fuel efficient as possible. To that end, in addition to the hybrid help this new 1.5-litre engine also features cylinder-on-demand.

The result is a claimed combined cycle fuel use figure of 5.7L/100km for the entry-level model.

Naturally the more powerful engines require more petrol. The 150kW models are rated at 7.3L/100km, while the 195kW has a claimed 8.1L/100km.

It’s worth noting that all three engines require a minimum 95 RON ‘premium’ fuel, which will only add to the cost at the pump in these times of high prices.

The 110KW/150kW models are fitted with a 55-litre fuel tank, while there is a bigger 60-litre tank for 195kW. That means theoretical driving ranges of approximately 960km for the 110kW models and just over 740km for the 150kW and 195kW offerings.

The T-Roc is essentially a previous-generation Golf-turned-small SUV in terms of its platform, and that’s a great thing for anyone who likes driving.

The Golf 7.5 was a benchmark for everyday driving as far as hatchbacks are concerned, and even though the current Mk8 might be a bit more up to date, the T-Roc’s use of the platform it rides on is practical and fun.

It’s not as nimble as a Golf, but the T-Roc in front-drive Style guise, with a responsive turbocharged engine and no all-wheel drive system weighing it down, is not only more dynamically capable than most rivals, it’s also easy to access that capability.

The 1.4-litre engine feels well-tuned for its two modes accessible through the shifter - calm but not lazy in ‘Drive’ and eager but not thrashy in ‘Sport’.

It works well with the transmission on the move, picking right gears fairly accurately, though there are paddles behind the wheel for those who prefer to take charge.

The drive modes are also more customisable than just those on the shifter, with 'Individual' selections for steering and drivetrain able to be used rather than the standard 'Eco', 'Normal' or 'Sport' full-system modes.

While the steering wheel itself is a little thick and the feedback, while adequate, isn’t the most telling, it’s accurate and inspires confidence in cornering.

The T-Roc handles turn-in and exits well, even soaking up bumps and not becoming unsettled when braking.

Its safety systems are relatively subtle, and the active cruise control is well sorted, though the automatic braking at car park speeds can be overzealous. Something I’ve experienced in VW Group models several times over the years.

The main culprit for the T-Roc was a shrub beside my driveway that, while not touching the car, would set off the automatic braking system. Still, better than letting the car roll back if there was a proper obstacle or someone who could be hurt in the way.

Aside from that, the Volkswagen T-Roc is fun and easy to drive, and the work that’s gone into that puts its price into perspective a little more.

There are more expensive cars available that are less impressive, some even disappointing.

While it may not be an RS model or a more dynamic sedan, part of the price premium you pay for an Audi is a more polished driving experience.

With that in mind, what Audi calls ‘Progressive steering’ (which is a variable ratio steering rack) is now standard across the range. This decision was driven by a desire to make the Q3 feel ‘more hatch-like’ to drive, being more responsive to driver inputs.

It certainly felt quite nice to drive at the launch, where we drove across a wide variety of conditions, including long stretches on winding mountain roads. The 110kW Launch Edition was enjoyable to drive in these conditions, even if the other two options offer a sportier driving experience with their extra power and all-wheel drive.

It should be noted again, we only drove Q3s fitted with adaptive dampers as those are included on the Launch Edition, so we can’t tell you how the true entry-level TFSI 110kW model rides and handles.

One minor concern was there were some rattles in one of the three cars we tested, centred around the dashboard and front doors. It’s notable because we have experienced similar potential build-quality issues with Volkswagen and Skoda products recently. This raises some questions about an area Volkswagen Group products have traditionally excelled in.

Having said that, it was only a problem in one of the three cars we drove, so it could be an isolated incident. But it’s something we will have to keep an eye and ear open to in future test drives.

Audi claims this is the safest Q3 ever, with more safety equipment than before to ensure it meets modern customer demands.

There’s a 360-degree camera setup, reversing camera, adaptive cruise control and a host of other active safety features. But perhaps more importantly than just having these systems, they are locally tested and calibrated for local conditions.

This has quickly become an area where the premium brands are separating themselves from the mainstream. In the case of the Q3 we found that the lane keeping assist and adaptive cruise control worked better than your average mainstream model, so the local testing appears to have paid off.

Another safety feature worth mentioning is the new parking assistance system, which now includes ‘reversing assist’. This new technology can remember the last 50m of your trip and reverse backwards without your help. There’s also ‘trained assist’, which can learn up to five specific parking situations, that you can program and save. So, if you have a particular driveway or parking spot you can teach the car once and it can park itself in future.

The Q3 comes equipped with enough safety to score a maximum five-star rating from Euro NCAP and ANCAP. However, in a confusing twist, this is based on testing done to the 2025 protocols, even though the Q3 has only gone on sale in 2026. So future five-star ANCAP models will have been tested to a theoretically higher standard, which is something to consider when comparing models from other brands.

Volkswagen’s five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty is pretty standard for a premium-leaning brand, with VW also offering roadside assistance for the warranty period.

In terms of servicing, VW offers care plans of three years or five years, covering servicing for $1515 or $2770 respectively. That's an average of $505 or $554 per workshop visit.

Otherwise, servicing costs at 12-month/15,000km intervals can cost from $470 for some to $1104 to the biggest service if you don’t go with the locked-in package.

The Q3 is covered by Audi Australia’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty. This includes five years of roadside assistance too.

There is a standard five-year servicing plan for $3300, which is the same as the outgoing model, with servicing required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first.

Audi has an expansive, nationwide dealer network befitting its place as an established sales leader in the premium space.