Toyota RAV4 vs Suzuki Vitara

What's the difference?

The RAV4 is undeniably better than the last generation, and brings with it a level of driving refinement the most popular car in the world should have.

It also levels up its tech without falling into the overcomplicated, messy systems newcomers to the market think will impress buyers. While the base GX is a sound option, the few extra mod cons in the GXL are worth the extra cash.

But its lack of ANCAP rating is surely a point of anxiety for Toyota, and while the safety systems seem sound, we can’t definitively say this RAV4 is as safe as Toyota claims it is.

If you’re willing to trust Toyota on that, you’ll find a very enjoyable car that’s uncomplicated and efficient. But if those five stars from ANCAP matter to you, give it a few months and see how the new RAV4 performs before you put your money down.

In car years, 11 is ancient.

Back when it was first released, this-generation Vitara’s competitive pricing, progressive yet pretty design, pleasant interior packaging, sporty dynamics and general driving ease helped establish the emerging small SUV segment into the powerhouse it is today.

In some ways, today’s Turbo Hybrid still impresses, especially with its punchy performance, promising economy and no-nonsense packaging. Objectively, it is still a decent proposition, with few actual vices.

But the 2026 Vitara’s high pricing, embarrassingly outdated interior, underwhelming specification and noisy ride leave it feeling too expensive, too old and too exposed against newer and more-sophisticated rivals.

Even the brightest stars eventually need to retire.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel and meals provided.

Each RAV4 in the range is more visually distinct than before, but most variants feature a similar honeycomb grille that’s a departure from the ‘safe’ design language Toyota is known for.

The outlier is the Edge variant, which gets a more traditional front-end treatment as well as its 20mm wider wheel tracks to go along with the intended purpose of light off-roading.

Despite the fact Toyota has clearly tried not to change the new RAV4 too much in too many ways compared to the last generation (and why would you when it was already so popular), the new design feels a little more adventurous.

It includes elements of Toyota’s latest design language including the ‘c-shaped’ headlights and more streamlined tail-lights but retains the overall size and shape of the RAV4.

The RAV4 is 4600mm long, 1855mm wide and 1680mm tall, a very similar size to before and as such its interior feels similarly spacious.

Inside, the layout is tidy with a little more visual distinction for controls than the last-gen RAV4.

Updated, sleeker buttons and controls replace the ageing fixtures and large screens make the mid-size SUV feel much more up to modern standards.

While the albeit-cheeky Mazda CX-3 clearly looks like a product of last decade, the Vitara’s boxy, broad-stance proportions were prescient, pointing to the upright shapes that prevail today. In other words, the good-looking design has aged remarkably well.

Changes to the headlights, a reshaped bumper, a revised grille, restyled wheels and paint colours are the only ways you can differentiate new from old, ignoring the Hybrid badge out back.

We wonder whether Suzuki should have tried harder visually updating the Vitara?

Measuring in at nearly 4.2 metres long, 1.8m wide and 1.6m high, the square-rigged styling hides the smallness of the Vitara, yet also seems to liberate more space inside than you might expect, aided by deep side windows.

Conversely, Suzuki’s decision to retain the old Vitara dashboard – including much of the same instrumentation – roots it into the middle of last decade. This is very disappointing.

But despite the sleeker look inside the new RAV4, Toyota hasn’t fallen into the trap of shoving as many digital features into the system as possible.

Many newcomer brands create confusing digital environments by having menus upon menus filled with options and features, but Toyota has avoided this by retaining a simple, almost siloed system.

In the multimedia display, navigation, media, phone and settings are the key shortcuts visible down the side of the screen, though a customisable home screen allows you to make the system your own.

It’s far preferable to the many sub-menus and confusing layouts some manufacturers (especially newcomers) use, and means you’re able to focus on driving.

There are also still plenty of physical controls for the key functions of the car, no need to go into digital settings to sort your drive mode or climate.

The new system, dubbed 'Arene' by Toyota, is a much-needed update for the RAV4, bringing it into the current decade when it comes to tech.

Its voice command system is still a little too keen to interrupt, but the general function is extremely easy to get acquainted with.

The interior is also physically extremely sensible, with good vision and light thanks to a low dashboard and large windows, well-considered ergonomic positioning, comfortable seats and storage options.

The centre console storage bin lid is also able to be opened from either side, or removed and flipped between a hard plastic surface or cushioned elbow rest, though a bit of non-slip surface on the plastic side wouldn't go astray.

Behind the front seats, the second row passengers don’t have a massive amount of amenity, but are far from cramped. The vents, armrest with cupholder, bottle storage in the door and document holder on the backs of the seats are all quite standard, though the outboard seats are heated in the top spec Cruiser.

Behind that, a huge 705L of space in the boot includes a netted pocket if you opt for the Edge grade, plus there's a proper spare wheel under the boot floor. Wins all round.

The practical shape, ease of access and spacious, airy cabin were reasons to buy the Vitara way back when, and remain relevant today.

But, stepping inside and taking a look around transports you to another time, like hearing Let it Happen by Tame Impala.

In the press release, Suzuki states: “Physical control switches remain a key focus, ensuring ease of use while driving, a touchpoint of Suzuki’s practical design philosophy.” Changing nothing in nearly a dozen years in production to save money seems more like the company’s key focus here. Even the steering wheel is precisely the same.

As we said earlier, nothing changed inside other than some minor trim, save for the new multimedia system that looks cheap and aftermarket compared to Suzuki’s earlier, distinctive and colourful quadrant layout. We welcome the inclusion of a digital speedometer, however.

Broad if flat front seats do the job, ahead of a workable driving position that helps provide good all-round vision as well as an easy reach to the multitude of buttons and switches placed around. The plastics have already proven to be long-lasting, while there is sufficient storage to be found. The climate control is effective, too.

The rear seat environment is spacious and pleasant enough, but lacks amenities like USB-C ports, cupholders and central air vents.

Further back, the load area is relatively large and simple to use. Cargo capacity varies from an unremarkable 362 litres to 642L (VDA – to the window height) or 1119L (to the ceiling), with the 60/40 rear backrests dropped providing extra versatility.

Thankfully, a space-saver spare wheel is included.

Overall, then, the Vitara’s cabin is roomy and user-friendly for a small SUV, but it also appears hopelessly out of date. That Suzuki also had the unrelated e-Vitara electric vehicle at the launch event just served to underline that fact.

From $39,990 (all prices are drive-away unless stated otherwise), 2026’s cheapest Vitara, the Turbo Hybrid 2WD, seems provocatively expensive for an 11-year-old generation. And the all-wheel drive (AWD) model dubbed 'AllGrip' is a heady $46,000. Oof.

This puts the base Vitara’s price well above Chinese hybrid equivalents like the Haval Jolion HEV and MG ZS Hybrid+, about on a par with popular small-SUV hybrids including the Honda HR-V, Hyundai Kona and Toyota Corolla Cross, and in company with lower-spec petrol-powered iterations of the Honda CR-V, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Seltos, Kia Sportage, Mazda CX-30, Mitsubishi ASX, Mitsubishi Outlander, Nissan X-Trail, Renault Duster, Subaru Crosstrek, Skoda Kamiq, Volkswagen T-Cross and VW T-Roc.

Facing a lion’s den of fierce rivals is putting things mildly. The Vitara’s value struggles to stack up.

But consider this.

Back in 2015, the base Vitara cost $23K, drive-away – or $31.4K in 2026 money adjusted for inflation. However, that was for a 1.6-litre petrol manual; the auto added the equivalent of another $2.7K and the optional turbo that came soon after (dubbed 'BoosterJet' – and now standard equipment) cost another $6.8K, coming to $41K.

Huh. Suzuki isn’t being so delusionally greedy, then.

And that’s not taking in the latest model’s unique hybrid tech, extra safety of advanced driver-assist technologies (ADAS) such as autonomous emergency braking (AEB), rear cross-traffic alert (RCTA), lane departure warning and blind-spot monitoring, or Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity, or a host of other extra features that have since been applied to an evolving Vitara over the years. Plus, import costs from Hungary are said to have skyrocketed.

If we compare what the 2026 Turbo Hybrid 2WD costs against the pre-facelift 2024 Turbo 2WD from $36,490, before on-road costs, the price rises aren’t nearly as bad as they seem (though runout ’24-build models are currently being promoted at $34,590, drive-away).

So, what else does your $40K-plus Vitara Turbo Hybrid give you?

Not much compared to most of the competition listed earlier. Climate control, rear privacy glass, LED automatic headlights, cloth upholstery, adaptive cruise control, a 7.0-inch touchscreen, reversing camera, 17-inch alloy wheels and flat paint are bare minimum at this price point.

Metallic paint demands another $745 if the standard white isn’t your bag.

Stretching to the $45,990 AWD adds a panoramic sunroof, 9.0-inch touchscreen, six instead of four speakers, extra driving modes, synthetic leather trim and two extra modish colours – beige or grey-blue that are also available with a two-tone black combo for an extra $1345.

The Vitara is over a decade old, but costs new-model money, lacks features found in rivals costing thousands less and only allows for a five-year warranty when some others offer up to 10.

Obama was US President when this Suzuki launched. The world it finds itself in today seems almost unrecognisable.

The 2.5-litre four-cylinder engine with series-parallel hybrid is less powerful than before, but Toyota says it did this for better efficiency and has made up for it with improvements to the battery and electric motors.

The figures are now 143kW and 221Nm (in 2WD and AWD variants), the power down from 160kW in the last generation. All RAV4s still use a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

Basically, lower numbers, but performance on par with the current RAV4 Hybrid according to Toyota.

If you’re expecting a Toyota-style series-parallel hybrid system here, forget it.

Instead, Suzuki offers a far-simpler, lighter and cheaper alternative that, by and large, does reduce fuel consumption. In other words, this is a mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) that, unlike others like Mazda’s, you can feel working away.

On paper, things look a bit shaky, since power drops noticeably compared to the previous 1.4-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-petrol BoosterJet engine this unit is based on.

This version makes just under 81kW of power at 4500rpm, instead of 103kW at 5500rpm, in the interests of economy. Torque jumps though, from 220Nm to 235Nm, between a low 2000rpm to 2500rpm.

More importantly, it is coupled to a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery, adding an additional 12kW/50Nm to simultaneously boost acceleration and reduce consumption and emissions.

Power is sent to the front wheels via a six-speed torque-converter automatic transmission, while the AWD version also sends drive to the rear axle when slippage is detected.

The whole MHEV system adds just 15kg, and is nestled between the MacPherson strut front axle and torsion beam rear end, for even weight distribution.

The new RAV4’s efficiency is of much interest, obviously, and with figures claimed at 0.2L less per 100km over the last RAV4, it’s another case of incremental improvements.

The 2WD comes with a claimed 4.5L/100km, the AWD with 4.6L. During testing we saw numbers as low as 6.8L and 6.9L, respectively, and that was giving it the beans in some pretty twisty mountain roads.

Keep in mind the RAV4 needs 95 RON minimum now, rather than the 91 RON it could deal with before.

The Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD returns a combined average 5.8 litres per 100km, while the AWD version is rated at 5.9L/100km. This translates to between 130 grams and 139g/km of carbon-dioxide emissions, respectively.

The previous 1.4-litre turbo equivalents were 5.9L and 6.2L/100km, so that mild-hybrid tech seems to make some difference. Our box-fresh test car’s trip computer driving around Sydney’s outer suburbs displayed 6.2L/100km.

Filling the 47L fuel tank with the required 95 RON premium-unleaded petrol, expect to average around 810km of range.

Put it this way - the RAV4 doesn’t feel like it’s lacking power. Despite the lower output, the new generation car doesn’t seem to struggle with having enough pick-up to keep moving along, even in spirited driving.

The first time I properly took off it surprised me with how punchy the response was. And from there on the new RAV continued to impress.

It’s one of a few things that, dare I say, makes the RAV4 rather fun to drive.

Like its predecessor, it’s built on the 'TNGA' platform, which underpins pretty much everything Toyota builds these days.

It’s a well-sorted basis for a car, making even this relatively large family SUV feel nimble.

Some changes to the suspension help here, too. New geometry and spring and damper rates mean the RAV4 is sharper and better controlled than before.

That control comes with the trade-off that it’s not always cloud-soft, but given Australian preferences and the need to keep the rubber on our rough as guts roads, Toyota has the balance right here.

It also hasn’t seemed to matter massively whether the RAV4 is front- or all-wheel drive even in the wet on twisty Tassie roads. The 2WD requires a little more care being flung into corners but the mid-sizer holds its own well enough.

There’s clearly more ability in the RAV4 than it’ll make known, almost as to keep the driver behaving safely just in case, while being confident in knowing the RAV4 is more capable than many will ever find out.

It’s handled high speeds, sharp corners and unsealed roads to a higher degree than anyone would reasonably expect of a family SUV.

It helps that the steering, throttle and braking are all well-calibrated. Planting your foot brings urgency without a jolt, there’s no guesswork in the steering and the brakes won’t have you lurching at a tap but can pull you up rather rapidly if needed.

It’s easy to drive, which is pretty big compliment and surely one of the key goals for the engineering team.

Suzuki allowed only a frustratingly limited amount of time for us to drive the Vitara Turbo Hybrid 2WD, over some outer-suburban Sydney back roads, in convoy with a lead car and in heavy traffic, so first impressions are limited.

But, unsurprisingly, it’s all very familiar, after years of testing earlier iterations.

Essentially, acceleration now feels leisurely in 'Eco' and 'Auto' when previously the 1.4L BoosterJet always felt punchy, but it becomes much stronger in 'Sport', suggesting the MHEV’s economy focus is the priority. The latter mode makes the Vitara feel lively and moves things along fairly quickly, but leaving it in Sport mode would defeat the purpose of trying to save fuel.

Meanwhile, the Vitara’s chassis calibration remains on the sporty side, with keen steering response and a decent level of handling agility there for the taking. And even the ride comfort wasn’t too bad, considering that too little suspension travel and too much road noise betray the age of this vehicle’s platform – though that may have also had something to do with us driving this back-to-back with the smoother e-Vitara EV.

Finally, the ADAS tech didn’t seem to interfere at all, though a longer drive may reveal otherwise.

The Vitara still drives okay, then, but its refinement and noise suppression may be issues for some people used to newer SUVs. The bigger problem for us is just how old the driving experience feels sitting inside such a dated cabin. Stale sums it up.

We also had a brief stint around a moderately-demanding off-road 4WD course to test the Turbo Hybrid AWD’s AllGrip set-up. The limited off-road aids – 4WD Lock, hill-descent control, a paltry 175mm ground clearance – helped see it navigate several carefully-chosen sections fairly confidently, but we can’t imagine this being the deal maker or breaker.

Overall, based on our brief time with it, the Vitara Turbo Hybrid remains an easy, competent and even enjoyable small SUV from behind the wheel, but one that feels dated in too many areas, especially at its asking price.

Back in 2015, the Vitara scored a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test rating, but it hasn’t been tested since and that result expired in December, 2022.

Both models come with the expected level of ADAS tech, including AEB, RCTA, lane departure warning, lane keep assist, blind-spot monitor, traffic sign recognition, auto high beam and adaptive cruise control.

There is no data on the operation parameters of the latest AEB system, but previous models operated from above 30km/h while the RCTA functions from 8.0km/h.

Six airbags (dual front, side and curtain) are also featured, along with two outboard rear-seat ISOFIX points and a trio of top tethers for child seats.

Toyota’s standard five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty is not just disappointing compared to other mainstream brands, but should be much higher given the brand is the biggest in the country (and world) and trades on its reputation for reliability.

The warranty can be extended to seven years from delivery if you maintain your logbook servicing with Toyota dealerships, but even then it falls short of Nissan and Mitsubishi’s 10-year (also servicing-conditional) warranties.

Capped-price servicing costs $325 per service and is available for five years or 75,000km, with intervals every 12 months or 15,000km.

Toyota boast a long-established national network of around 300 dealers covering all states and territories including major cities and key regional and rural centres.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, along with five years of roadside assistance if the vehicle is serviced at an authorised dealer.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while the basic capped-price servicing costs are $329, $429, $339, $539 and $349 annually for the first five years or 100,000km, respectively. That's an average of $397.

At the time of publishing Suzuki listed 90 dealers throughout Australia.