Tesla Model 3 vs Suzuki Swift

What's the difference?

Tesla has done enough with the introduction of this Premium Long Range RWD variant to keep the Model 3’s head well and truly above water in an increasingly competitive segment. After more than six years it still looks good, with a pleasant cabin environment, plenty of performance and leading energy efficiency. Safety is top-shelf and it stands up well in terms of practicality and driving dynamics. 

That said, the ownership proposition is average, the determination to make so many functions screen-based is frustrating and the optional Full Self-Driving system is unconvincing. With the Model S and Model Y now discontinued globally it will be interesting to see how the Model 3 continues to evolve.

So, there you have it. A brief look at the new, sixth-gen Swift.

Better where it needs to be, the supermini survivor still remains competitively priced, with loads of new efficiency and safety tech that buyers will appreciate.

But, most of all, the Suzuki still feels, drives and rewards like the old model used to. It just does so with more sophistication.  

As inexpensive city cars continue to fade, the new Swift continues 41 years of providing a fun, affordable and dependable solution, in a vibrant and desirable package.

After four years in market, a heavily upgraded version of the Model 3 arrived in Australia in 2023, the biggest visual changes being a reshaped bonnet, aero massaged overall profile and angular slimline headlights.

The boot lid now incorporates a lip spoiler and the tail-lights were remodelled to create a truncated, two-layer effect. And in true Tesla fashion, the standard 18-inch alloy rims are fitted with matt black-finish aero elements filling the gaps between the satin black wheel spokes. Two new body colours - ‘Stealth Grey’ and ‘Ultra Red’ - were recently added to the available palette. For reference, our test car's finish is 'Quicksilver'. 

It’s still clearly recognisable as a Model 3, but these relatively minor design changes have helped the mid-sizer keep up with the slew of sleek newcomers it now faces.

The interior was also given a substantial makeover, the expansive 15.4-inch central display screen backgrounded by an all-new wrap-around dash and revised console treatment, the former featuring a raised insert and the latter a two-device wireless charging station.

Introduction of this Premium Long Range RWD model also brought the small but significant addition of a physical indicator stalk on the left-hand side of the steering column, replacing buttons on the steering wheel. Big ergonomic tick for that.

Customisable ambient lighting lifts the tone, soft materials look and feel good and the doorcards, bins and armrests have been reprofiled into a more sophisticated arrangement.

Our test car’s dark grey and white synthetic leather trim combination lifts the mood as does light from the huge, two-panel glass roof. But beware, while white trim looks dazzling on the showroom floor it takes some extra work to maintain its schmick appearance in the day-to-day grind.

After seven years in market the Model 3 has aged well and still looks sleek and contemporary.

At first glance, the new one looks a lot like the old one. Short overhangs, long wheelbase, upright A-pillars, that signature 'floating' roof. This could be nothing else but a Swift.

Obviously, though, every single panel has changed, resulting in a stronger, quieter and more aerodynamic body.

Helping communicate this is a new and very definite crease line added to create a more-pronounced shoulder. The bonnet seems to be more clamshell-like and the nose is squarer, too. Indeed, everything about the overall styling seems to be more upright.

Debate is already raging in some circles. Is the new Swift too fussy? Too conservative? Has it lost the playful boldness of the proceeding version's gently-sculptured sides and hidden rear-door handles? Are the proportions slightly out now? Has the previous design integrity and oneness of vision been diluted? Does the 2017 predecessor look better?

Underneath, the platform is essentially the same, while overall dimensions are largely identical except for a 20mm stretch and 25mm roof lift. Length, width, height and wheelbase numbers 3860mm, 1735mm, 1520mm and 2450mm, respectively.

Happily, the aesthetic changes inside are likely to please rather than perplex, and even delight rather than divide opinion.

At just over 4.7m long, more than 1.8m wide and a bit over 1.4m tall (with a 2875mm wheelbase) the Tesla Model 3 is a low-slung medium-size sedan. 

There’s plenty of space up front, a feeling enhanced by the standard panoramic glass roof and our test car’s white trim brightening up the cabin.

There are long, wide bins on the front doors with enough room for large bottles, a slim glove box (which opens only via an on-screen button, which is annoying) and a generous lidded storage box between the seats that doubles as a centre armrest.

The console houses two cupholders with another storage cubby ahead of them (both with sliding covers over the top) and the dual device wireless charging bay on the lower part of the dash under the media screen.

Switching to the rear, at 183cm I have a surprising amount of foot, leg and headroom when sitting behind the driver’s seat set to my position. The rear door aperture is surprisingly large which helps entry and egress.

Technically able to accommodate three passengers, the back seat is best for two full-size adults on anything other than a mid-length journey, although the flat rear floor helps ease pressure on the centre occupant.

There's a well-hidden fold-down centre armrest with cupholders, there are useful bins in the doors and hard shell map pockets on the front seatbacks.

The crisp 8.0-inch rear screen is a welcome entertainment option for back-seaters and there are adjustable air vents underneath it.

For power and connectivity there are two USB-C ports and a 12-volt socket in the front compartment, a USB-A in the glove box (mainly for dash cam and ‘Sentry Mode’ data storage) and two USB-C ports in the rear under the vents.

Boot space is a ample at 682 litres (the bootlid is adjustable for opening height) with an 88L ‘frunk’ in the nose. And if you need to tow a relatively light load like a box trailer or Jet Ski (or two) you can hook up a 1.0-tonne braked trailer (750kg unbraked).

While we understand it helps maximise battery space and reduce weight, we’re not on board with Tesla’s policy of providing a repair/inflator kit rather than a physical spare tyre. Even though this is likely to be a primarily urban cruiser, it’s not good enough. 

Then, there’s the Tesla app, an electronic Swiss Army Knife that facilitates everything from remote vehicle access and cabin ‘preconditioning’ to planning your route (complete with charging stops) and monitoring Sentry Mode (checking the vehicle’s surroundings and receiving alerts of potential threats).

The list of functions goes on and on, but suffice it to say the app is hugely handy. For example, ‘Dog Mode’ keeps the air con on with the car locked for the benefit of your four-legged friend and lets passers by know the doggo is safe via a bold message on the central screen. An internal camera, accessible via the app, lets you check-in remotely, too. Nice. 

Given its overall size and despite its conventional sedan configuration, the Tesla Model 3 offers efficient packaging and a heap of thoughtful features to enhance everyday practicality.

From a packaging perspective, the latest Swift carries on from before, and that’s no bad thing. It remains exceptionally roomy as well as practical.

To that end, entry and egress are easy, there’s a sense of spaciousness thanks to deep windows, a high ceiling and lofty seating, while the latter also helps provide an agreeable driving position. Storage and ventilation are provided in abundance.

For many people, the dash redesign reflects a big change in attitude, having finally grown up and away from the previous cheap and cheerful look. Highlights include pleasing seat fabrics, interesting textures and a sense of quality craftspersonship, within a stylish and sweeping design. After 41 years, the Swift has matured gracefully.

It’s also worth pointing out the super-clear analogue instrumentation dials, supported by a digital speedo and configurable trip computer data; actual buttons for the heating and air-conditioning system and – joy of joys – a handbrake lever.

Plus, if you want to turn off the various beeps from the driver-assist systems, physical buttons are but a simple press away. No distracting sub-menu searches within fiddly touchscreens here, thanks.

Except if you want to change the volume because you’ll need to prod the screen after all. The knob is always the better option, Suzuki.

What else? The rear bench area is a little plain but surprisingly roomy for this class of light car. Probably more so than a Corolla provided back in the early 2000s, with a decent level of cushy support for two people or three at a squeeze.

Given the extra specification, even the cheapest grade is all the Swift you’ll need. A sign of a democratic car.

But keep in mind the base variant no longer comes with a driver’s seat adjuster, passenger vanity mirror and multiple USB ports found in the Plus and GLX versions, while it is alone with a clammy plastic rather than leather-sheathed steering wheel rim.

At least cargo capacity edges up, by 23 litres to 265L (VDA), and that’s just under the luggage cover, thanks to some clever repackaging of a now-lower boot floor and internal tailgate panels. Drop the rear backrests and that expands to 569L.

Note, however, that for the Swift to achieve its sensationally low kerb weight that starts from just 919kg (up around 50kg), it now uses a fiddly and frankly-inadequate tyre repair kit. Thankfully, Suzuki offers that space-saver spare, at extra cost (and mass) of course.

Still, keeping those kilos low pays high dividends when it comes to performance and economy.

So. Why are there so few affordable city-sized superminis like the Swift?

Just 10 years ago, the Swift had at least 25 rivals under $25,000. Today that’s phonetically as well as literally down "t(w)o" "three" – namely, the ageing but still-surprisingly-spry Mazda2 and intriguing all-new MG 3, as well as Australia’s sole sub-$20K new car, Kia's darling Picanto.

Many of the Class of 2014 have since morphed into pint-sized crossover hatchbacks like Suzuki’s soon-to-be-discontinued Ignis, the Hyundai Venue and Kia Stonic. And if you must, there are also the cheerless MG ZS and ancient Mitsubishi ASX biggish-small SUVs – but they’re cheapo for a reason.

Unlike the latest Swift... which, from $24,490 drive-away, is more than reasonably cheap, since it introduces some electrification tech across the whole range, while still being around the same price as the old base GL.

This now makes the new Swift Australia’s cheapest 'hybrid'.

Granted, despite wearing the Hybrid badge on every grade, it’s just a mild hybrid system, but one that provides extra electrification to usefully boost performance and economy for the all-new powertrain and revised transmissions. More on all that later.

What else? The base Swift at last gains LED lights, telescopic as well as tilt steering adjustment and important driver-assist safety like Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), along with lane-support systems, adaptive cruise control and rear parking sensors.

Also included now are keyless entry/start, a 9.0-inch touchscreen as part of a new multimedia set-up, wireless for Apple CarPlay (but not for the Android Auto), a digital radio, heated mirrors, traffic sign recognition, auto high beams and an alarm.

And there's more. The entry-level Swift Hybrid is also class unique in offering a manual gearbox. Good on you, Suzuki.

Not for you? Don't worry, because the Hybrid auto that is expected to be the bestseller starts from $26,990, drive-away. For the record, that’s only about $1000 more than the equivalent old version but with all that extra gear to boot.

But, beware, the base-model Hybrid alone lacks a few items that may or may not have been standard in the outgoing Swift, such as a driver’s seat-height adjuster, leather-wrapped steering wheel, privacy glass, alloy wheels, front passenger vanity mirror, front-seat map pockets, multiple USB charging outlets and a spare wheel (though you can pay extra for one as the wheel-well remains).

All of the above, except the missing spare, are included in the new Hybrid Plus auto grade, from $28,490 drive-away, along with heated front seats and additional driver-assist tech like a blind-spot monitor. We’ll get into more detail in the Safety section below.

Finally, there’s the Hybrid GLX auto, with its wireless phone charger, folding exterior mirrors, steering wheel paddle shifters, climate control, glossy alloys and more from $29,490, drive-away.

Sadly, the terrific old GLX 'BoosterJet' three-cylinder turbo is no more, and there might not even be a new Swift Sport to continue the GTi hot-hatch legacy.

Still, Suzuki’s managed to keep the entire range under $30K drive-away, despite big changes inside and out. Let’s check those out.

The Tesla Model 3 Premium Long Range RWD is powered by a single permanent magnet synchronous electric motor producing a handy 235kW and in excess of 400Nm.

It sends drive to the rear wheels only via a single-speed, direct-drive automatic transmission. 

Kerb weight is 1747kg and Tesla claims 0-100km/h acceleration in a rapid 5.2 seconds.

If there’s one area where Suzuki shines, that’s in making sweet little engines, and the new, chain-driven, 1197cc 1.2-litre mild hybrid three-cylinder petrol unit is no exception.

Now, on paper, 61kW at 5700rpm and 112Nm at 4500rpm may seem slightly lacking. A Mazda2 manages to make nearly 35 and 30 per cent more power and torque, respectively.

But the Swift's new 'ISG' integrated starter/generator/electric motor unit delivers an additional 2.3kW and 60Nm.

Combined with the hatchback's comparative lightness, it makes for a sufficient power-to-weight ratio of between 63 and 66kW per tonne.

Or, in other words, it provides some welcome extra low-down muscle.

Drive is naturally sent to the front wheels, via either a light-yet-positive shifting five-speed manual gearbox, or new CVT auto. Both have been heavily revised in their new roles serving the mild-hybrid powertrain.

Tesla claims a WLTP range of up to 750km for the Model 3 Premium Long Range RWD, the official EV term for which is… a lot. 

As mentioned earlier, at the time of the car’s local launch in October last year Tesla claimed it as the longest-range EV in Australia and at the time of writing nothing had arrived to change that.

Unlike the standard Model 3, which is powered by a CATL-sourced LFP battery, the Long Range RWD is fitted with a lighter, more energy dense NMC pack from LG with a total capacity of 82kWh (78kWh usable).

In terms of energy consumption, Tesla claims 12.5kWh/100km on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle and on test we experimented with liberal use of the accelerator pedal, higher than average freeway running and keeping the car constantly chilled during extremely hot weather, which resulted in an average of 15.7kWh/100km. 

Aside from that, more typical stop-start urban driving with occasional use of the ‘Chill’ (eco-focused) mode brings the number down to 13.1kWh/100km.

That’s an impressive performance, with even the upper test figure more than acceptable for a 1.75-tonne electric sedan.

Capable of accepting a 250kW fast charge, Tesla says the Model 3 Long Range RWD can take on 311km of range in 15 minutes, at that speed.

On a 150kW pylon we saw capacity go from 15-85 per cent (theoretically, 600km of range) in roughly 50min, although the charger fluctuated below peak output throughout.

The latest Swift’s maturity does not end with its suave cabin presentation.

Prioritising high economy and subsequently low pollution, this Euro 6d-rated three-pot hybrid powertrain promises an astonishing combined fuel-consumption average of just 3.8 litres per 100km for the manual, and slightly more for the CVT at 4.0L/100km.

The results are 78 and 80 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions, respectively, along with around 970km between refills of the meagre 37L fuel tank.

These facts somewhat ease the pain of the need for more-expensive 95 RON premium unleaded petrol instead of the regular brew. High-tech solutions do require superior fuel, after all.

With just 70km on our ultra-tight test car’s odometer, the trip computer’s 6.7L readout is likely no indicator of the frugality we’re expecting to come.

So, how are such low consumption figures attainable? Along with better aerodynamics and a low kerb weight, the latest Swift Hybrid’s ISG hybrid unit generates supplementary electricity under acceleration, to ease the engine’s reliance on petrol.

It also recharges the 12-volt lithium-ion battery that lives beneath the front passenger-seat floor off-throttle via regenerative braking.

Note that the Suzuki never drives purely on electricity.

So, surprise, surprise, the Tesla Model 3 Premium Long Range RWD is quiet. But it’s quiet, even in the context of other EVs in this part of the market.

That’s thanks in part to acoustic glass in the front, rear and side windows as well as the dual-pane glass roof and the Bridgestone Turanza T005 EV tyres (235/45x18) featuring ‘B-Silent’ technology. Corny, but it works.

A kerb weight under 1.8 tonnes is relatively lightweight for an EV of this size and the Model 3 RWD is quick with 0-100km/h acceleration in a fraction over five seconds. There’s always plenty of pulling power under your right foot. 

Suspension is double wishbone front, multi-link rear and ride comfort is respectable rather than exceptional. Smaller bumps and irregularities find their way into the cabin but never to an alarming degree.

Steering sits in the middle-of-the-road between tactile and wooden, which is par for the EV course, although it's accurate and pleasingly progressive. Body roll, even in enthusiastic cornering, is modest. 

The physical brakes are ventilated discs front and rear although they don’t come into play all that often because the Model 3’s regenerative braking system is so good. Single-pedal operation soon becomes the norm. 

Our test car’s optional ‘Full Self-Driving (Supervised)’ will set you back $10,100 as a one-off payment, or $149 per month and Tesla says when using it, “Under your supervision, your car will be able to drive itself almost anywhere with minimal driver intervention”.

We engaged it for a 30km trip through suburbia, across the Sydney Harbour Bridge and into the city’s inner south. 

A rainbow-coloured magic carpet in front of the car graphic on the nav map tells you the system is engaged and although things went smoothly at first we soon sliced a bit off the inner oncoming lane as we turned right at a T-intersection, which was alarming. 

The system also has a consistent tendency to stick to the far right-hand side of the lane, stay five to 10km/h under the signposted speed limit and it continued to operate without my hands on the wheel, although I kept them there for 99.9 per cent of the drive (which is tiring when you’re not doing the steering).

Having been squeezed to the point where we couldn’t merge safely into a particular arterial road the nav took us on what’s known in the trade as a wild goose chase that had to be nipped in the bud. If I hadn’t known my way around it could have been a huge waste of time and (vehicle) energy. As much a nav issue as an FSD one, but overall, let’s just say, I’m not convinced.

Under the heading of miscellaneous observations, I’m not a fan of the on-screen gear position slider in place of a physical control. It’s needlessly fussy, although its ability to automatically switch between D to R (and back) during slow-speed manoeuvres is helpful. 

The software behind the car’s multitude of functions is exceptionally good, as is the ability to swipe in the vicinity of the temp and audio volume screen sliders, rather than having to hit them bang on and the blind-spot camera view which pops up on the screen when indicating on either side is handy.

No Swift since 2004’s new-millennium redesign has been anything less than fun to punt around. A focus on driving pleasure and superior dynamics has helped make each version a cut-above most rivals.

Losing the smooth old 1.2-litre four-cylinder engine in the name of low consumption and emissions is a noble move. But how does this translate out in the real world, especially with a Swift fan behind the wheel?

It's mostly great, actually.

Losing a cylinder results in a slightly less creamy power delivery, especially as it’s accompanied by a distinctive three-cylinder exhaust-note thrum. But that’s still in keeping with the Swift’s endearingly sporty character.

Better still, even with all the examples we tested showing barely more than delivery mileage on the odometer, there seems to be more than enough grunt to please driving enthusiasts.

While not wanting to tax engines that weren’t even run-in yet, the charming revvy eagerness and instant throttle response remains, along with a discernible extra kick when accelerating away from standstill.

Even being so new, our Swifts proved to be lively, lusty and surprisingly rapid performers. We can’t wait to test run-in examples!

The five-speed manual is deliciously well-oiled and precise, immersing the driver into the Swift experience on another level compared to the CVT auto, which still manages to impress by responding quickly and effortlessly, without feeling laggy or droney. A lot like the old version.

Suzuki is making a lot of noise over how agile yet comfortable the newcomer’s handling and ride qualities are, as a result of improved rigidity and noise-dampening measures.

The Swift’s MacPherson-style front struts and torsion beam rear suspension systems have been revised with stronger and quieter mounts for better performance, while the electric steering has been retuned for greater feel and linearity. 

The result? Even our limited time behind the wheel revealed tactile and precise steering, composed handling and extraordinary isolation from the road below for a car barely weighing 950kg (at most).

Combined with the nuanced driver-assist safety tech that rarely interrupted the fun, the latest Swift is a cheerfully animated, nimble and rewarding experience... and one that stands out all the more for evolving while so many other like-minded rivals like the Ford Fiesta have sadly fallen away.

Bravo, Suzuki. Generation Number Six remains the enthusiast driver’s choice, and a hybrid bargain to boot.

The latest, sixth-generation Swift has yet to be crash-tested by ANCAP.

Even the base Hybrid now includes driver-assist safety like AEB that includes night and day pedestrian and cyclist detection as standard, along with lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, 'Weaving Alert' (a driver-drowsiness warning prompt), rear parking sensors, traffic-sign recognition, a reverse camera, automatic high beams and adaptive cruise control.

You’ll need to go Hybrid Plus for rear-cross traffic alert and blind-spot warning tech, though.

Note that Suzuki does not supply information about the AEB and other driver-assist tech’s operating parameters.

Also fitted are six airbags (dual front, dual front side and curtain), electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake-assist.

The rear seats also contain a trio of child-seat tether anchorages, as well as an outboard pair of ISOFIX attachments.

From January 1, 2026 all new Teslas sold in Australia have been covered by a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty (including roadside assistance for the duration), up from four years/80,000km, previously.

A big step forward, no doubt, but that just gets Tesla to a base, mainstream market level with a dozen brands now at seven years, several at eight and three at 10 years (conditional).

The drive battery is covered for eight years/192,000km, which is in line with the category norm. And a Body Rust Limited Warranty covers rust perforation for 12 years, unlimited kilometres, which is reassuring.

Tesla servicing is condition-based, so there’s no fixed schedule, with a summary on the car’s touchscreen providing a record of when vehicle maintenance was last carried out and prompts for when they should be performed next.

In the absence of a combustion powertrain the emphasis is on things like wheel rotation, balancing and alignment, brake fluid testing, air-con servicing, camera precision, radiator cleaning and high-voltage battery maintenance.

Theoretically, if a workshop visit is flagged in the car’s system, it could include actions like a ‘Vehicle Health Check’ ($270), ‘General Diagnosis’ (270 per hour), brake fluid flush ($240.80) and replacement of both cabin air filters ($106.60).

Things like air-con desiccant bag replacement ($89.18), tyre rotation ($81.00), a wheels check - if tyre wear is abnormal ($81) and a wheel alignment ($225) are also set inspection and service items. All prices exclusive of GST.

In the States, the brand provides a range of estimated annual service pricing of between US$257 - US$499 ($367-$712), based on data collected by car buying specialist CarEdge. The suggested service range is around 20,000km and the first five annual estimates are at US$300 ($430) or less.

Tesla has 25 stores in Australia, not surprisingly covering mainly urban and larger regional centres, including four each in Melbourne and Sydney, three in Canberra, two each in Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth as well as one in Hobart.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, while basic capped-price servicing is available, with the website showing pricing for the first five years and 100,000km averaging $391 per workshop visit.