Suzuki Ignis vs Mazda CX-3

What's the difference?

With statement styling, inherent agility, excellent efficiency, proven reliability, high equipment levels and low entry pricing, the 2021 Ignis GLX is in danger of becoming a mandatory short-list proposition for people seeking fun and affordable motoring.

But undermining all that is a distinct lack of driver-assist safety tech that can’t be – and shouldn’t be – ignored. At least give buyers the option of paying more for essentials like AEB.

If Suzuki can address this shortfall, the Ignis would join its excellent Swift supermini stablemate in being a very compelling and enjoyable compact urban runabout. We hope this happens sooner rather than later.

‘You get what you pay for’ comes to mind with the CX-3, which is interesting given it’s neither the newest nor most feature-packed SUV in its class.

The ageing light SUV does however offer one of the best-put-together experiences in a car of this size and its engine is powerful for the class. Build quality feels well above par and there aren’t any annoying inclusions that are becoming more common in new cars.

There aren’t many downsides unless you were hoping for a big screen and the ability to play around with software functions, but at this end of the new car spectrum, a car that drives this well and remains stylish a decade on should be applauded.

Put aside its relative (but forgivable) lack of efficiency and somewhat smaller boot than rivals, and the CX-3 nails everything it needs to.

Sometimes facelifts do really improve the look of a vehicle, as is the case here with the MF Series II.

Maybe it’s the Suzuki Jimny 4x4-inspired quad-nostril grille or chunkier rear bumper inserts, but they somehow make the Japanese-built crossover seem less narrow and tippy-toed.

The styling – first seen in 2016 – actually references classic Suzukis of old like the late 1970s Cervo SC100 (as per the C-pillar slit inserts and angular silhouette) that were never offered in Australia anyway.

A good thing, then, that the Ignis’ handsome proportions, flared wheel arches, deep glass area, anthropomorphic grille and pushed-out wheelbase and tracks give it a purposeful look and stance that also stands as an attractive and individualistic 21st Century design in its own right.  

Measuring in at 3700mm in length, 1660mm in width and 1595mm in height, the Ignis is substantially stubbier and narrower (though slightly taller) than the Hyundai Venue, whose corresponding numbers are 4040mm, 1770mm and 1592mm, respectively. The Suzuki’s 2435mm wheelbase is also 85mm shy of the Hyundai.

Still, the result doesn’t mean the Ignis’ cabin seems overly tight or cramped in any shape or form.

For one, there’s the way it looks inside and out.

The Mazda CX-3 hasn’t remained the most popular car in its segment on price, so the fact its styling continues to age gracefully in the design-focused light SUV segment (aimed at young or first-new car buyers) must have something to do with it.

While it’s been lightly updated a couple of times since 2014, the CX-3 is still in its first generation and has stood the test of time.

Looking like a jacked-up Mazda2, the CX-3 brings some traditional aesthetic to a category peppered with more divisive and daring (but admittedly admirable) designs like the Hyundai Venue, Suzuki Ignis (RIP) or the cute but prohibitively expensive Jeep Avenger.

Some elements of the CX-3, like the chrome trim around the grille or the black plastic cladding along the bottom of the body and around the wheel arches, seemed in the past like they had the potential to age poorly, but Mazda’s design language has only slowly changed since 2015, and the CX-3 still looks at-home in the brand’s line-up.

It’s not the most adventurous - even inside its layout is quite basic - but it does give off a premium vibe and the fact it plays things a little bit safe means the CX-3’s broad appeal is undeniable.

Thinking about it, the Ignis is uniquely suited to city life.

Forget its diminutive proportions for a moment, and consider instead that it has extraordinarily high seating positions and a tall turret. Perfect for stepping inside the car with some degree of dignity.

Once sat on the big, comfy and lofty front seats, you’re immediately struck by how confidence-building the commanding driving position, assisted by the excellent all-round vision afforded by the deep glass area and upright pillars and a pleasant leather-like steering wheel cover.  

The front buckets themselves are comfy and enveloping, even though there is no lumbar adjustment support fitted; there is a height lever on the driver’s side, ample rearward travel for taller folk and side bolstering to help hug you through corners, while the soft cloth material feels good to the touch.

Suzuki’s thought about storage, as demonstrated by the big glovebox, bottle-holding door pockets up front, deep lower-console shelf and trio of cupholders, though there is no central armrest or bin, even in this up-spec grade.

Suzuki’s gone for a somewhat old-school off-roader theme inside, evidenced by the chunky heater/air-con controls, toggle switchgear and 4x4-look pared-back dash, while there’s plenty of hardy, hollow-sounding plastics to remind you that this is built down to a price. One lovely retro detail is the ‘60s pull-out bonnet release.

Operating the GLX’s climate control is child’s play, and the same applies to the ageing but still effective multimedia system, with its colourful display, easy connectivity and handy sat-nav. Note that the virtual volume slider on the screen is slow, fiddly and ultimately needlessly distracting. Give us a proper knob any day of the week. And what about a digital radio receiver, please, Suzuki?

We’re also less fond of the tilt-only non-telescopic steering column, as some drivers found it difficult to find the perfect position as a result, while the lack of digital speedo when there is room for it in the instrumentation’s LCD window smacks of penny pinching. Otherwise, the Ignis’ layout and design generally really hit the mark.

The rear doors open at nearly 90 degrees, aiding entry to and egress from the back seat. Although the front passenger seat lacks a height adjuster, it is still set up high, so big feet can tuck in underneath for taller occupants behind.

Being a GLX, the bench is split 50/50, is designed to only carry two people (so there’s no centre belt but ample width as a consequence) and the backrest reclines in 10 (narrow) positions for added comfort. Both also slide forward by a significant amount, boosting cargo space. Parents and guardians of smaller children might find this helpful as they can be positioned closer to the front seats for access that’s within arm’s reach.

The backrests themselves are… OK and clearly intended for smaller folk. Your 178cm tester found a distinct lack of under-thigh support due to the short squab and the backrest doesn’t reline far enough back for true comfort. And except for the aforementioned third cupholder nestled right at the rear of the front-seat lower-console area, door-pull recess that might hold an upright smartphone as well as a small bottle receptacle built into the door card, storage is non-existent back there. Yes, there is one map pocket, but that’s your lot. You’ll also search in vain for overhead grab handles (only the front passenger gets one), reading lights and rear-seat centre armrest – a wasted opportunity given this car’s four-seater status.

On the other hand, there’s space galore in every direction due to that very status, excellent vision and windows that wind (electrically of course) all the way down for a light and airy feel. Fido will be pleased. Just remember to bring your ear plugs if constant road noise bothers you.

Further back, you’ll marvel at the versatility of the cargo area, thanks to the sliding split bench that increases cargo capacity from 264 litres in normal four-seat mode to 515L with the backrests folded and 1104L in “maximum volume” mode. Note the five-seater GL’s ranges from 271L to 505L to 1101L respectively.

It’s properly long and deep in this setting. There’s a deep floor (with a space-saver spare underneath) and a light, but not much else. The fit and finish is fine but the floor seems flimsy and the parcel shelf lightweight. At least it isn’t mesh as per the Honda HR-V’s.

The Mazda CX-3 isn’t the most spacious light SUV on the inside, but from either of the front seats it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the best way to make the cabin work.

For example, precious space hasn’t been wasted by two dedicated cupholders, instead there’s a cupholder in the central storage compartment that’s relatively easy to reach into.

Like its design and some of its features, the CX-3’s layout can’t hide its age - there are still big physical controls for the climate settings, the speedometer is a physical dial and the gear selector is a very traditional style.

Mazda’s soon-to-be-gone media control wheel persists in the CX-3, which is by no means a bad thing. It falls nicely to hand, as with many of the controls in the CX-3. Its seating position isn’t too high and the positions you’re able to get the seat and steering wheel into should accommodate most humans.

Behind the front seats it’s a little more spartan. Space is at a premium, with my 178cm frame fitting in the back seat just enough that I had a fair bit of headroom, but my knees were able to brush the seat in front, set to my own driving position.

There are no ports for charging or vents in the second row, but the fold-down armrest has a clever fold-away cupholder. The window shoulder is a little high for young kids to properly see out, but there’s enough light that it doesn’t feel cramped.

The boot is similarly diminutive, a 264-litre space becoming 1174L with the second row folded down. Compare it with the Hyundai Venue and its 355-litre boot, or the Toyota Yaris Cross and its 390 litres, and the CX-3’s simple, well-constructed interior starts to lose points.

Upon updating the Mazda CX-3, the Evolve variant is now a $32,100 ask before on-road costs, which is $900 more than before. It’s a little step up from the $30,370 entry price of the Pure, but falls well short of the top-spec Akari’s $38,890 sticker price.

The CX-3 range now comes with updated autonomous emergency braking and adaptive cruise control, with the Evolve specifically scoring new fog lights and keyless entry.

The Evolve also comes with black machined 18-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim and front parking sensors.

This is all on top of the CX-3’s standard kit which includes a leather-wrapped gear shift knob, handbrake handle and steering wheel, keyless start, an 8.0-inch multimedia display, wireless Apple CarPlay and wired Android Auto plus LED headlights, daytime running lights and tail-lights.

For its segment, the CX-3 isn’t cheap. The Evolve grade is more expensive than pretty much the entire line-ups of rivals like the Kia Stonic or Hyundai Venue, and its price somewhat lines up with the newer, hybrid-powered Toyota Yaris Cross.

But there’s more to the CX-3 than just a list of features.

Nearing 10 years in production, Suzuki’s K12C 1242cc 1.2-litre twin-cam 16-valve four-cylinder petrol engine is a tried and tested naturally-aspirated unit, revving strongly and effortlessly all the way to its red line. Peak power is 66kW at 6000rpm and the torque top is rated at 120Nm at 4400rpm.

With a kerb weight of just 865kg – a Suzuki specialty – the Ignis boasts a power-to-weight ratio of a healthy 76.3kW/per tonne.

It’s a shame the GLX isn’t available with the GL’s five-speed manual gearbox. Instead, your lot is an albeit-efficient automatic of the CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) variety, driving just the front wheels for Aussie-bound Ignis models.

Overseas there are mild-hybrid and all-wheel drive alternatives too.

The Mazda CX-3 is still powered by a 2.0-litre, naturally aspirated, four-cylinder petrol engine, as has been the case for years. Its outputs remain at 110kW/195Nm.

It drives the front wheels only, via a six-speed automatic transmission.

Suzuki’s weight-loss obsession is great news for people wanting a high-economy urban crossover.

Tuned to run on 91 RON standard unleaded petrol, our Ignis GLX returned an efficient 6.2 litres per 100km at the pump. And while that is somewhat off the 4.9L/100km Suzuki claims, much of that was in heavy peak-hour traffic with the air-con on, or during performance testing out on the open road.

That 4.9L/100km published average figure translates to a carbon-dioxide emissions rating of just 114 grams per kilometre. Even with the Ignis’ tiny 32-litre tank, over 650km between refills is possible.

Mazda claims the CX-3 sips 6.3 litres of fuel per 100km, minimum 91 RON petrol, though on test the small SUV returned an 8.1L/100km figure under a mix of urban, highway and some dynamic driving.

With its 48-litre fuel tank, that means you’re realistically likely to get about 550km to a tank, though theoretically given Mazda’s efficiency claim a 760km trip on a single tank would be possible - if you could recreate the test lab conditions.

Comparatively conventional in mechanical layout it may be, but the Ignis feels especially at home around town.

A strong and revvy 1.2-litre engine, coupled to a flexible CVT, provides eager off-the-line acceleration, though the accompanying loud exhaust drone may get tiresome for some. Aided by the Suzuki’s light mass, luckily there’s sufficient low-down response for most drivers to experience healthy performance without having to assault all occupants’ ear drums.

What this means is that the Ignis will accelerate quite vigorously once on the move, with plenty of oomph available as the revs rise towards the 6000rpm peak power point. Yes, the CVT will elicit an endless moan from the engine, but speed does build up quickly and before you know it.

We weren’t expecting to find a ‘Sport’ mode button located on the side of the auto’s shifter; locking out the highest ratios, it keeps the tacho needle within a pre-determined power band that’s useful if noticeably stronger throttle response is required. Otherwise, in Normal mode, the powertrain is tuned to upshift to top gear in the interest of efficiency. It’s good that the Suzuki at least gives the keener driver some choice in the matter.

This is also the best Ignis we’ve driven yet when it comes to steering. Around town, the turning circle is smaller than federal funding for the arts, environment and education portfolios come budget time, providing stupendously easy parking, effortless manoeuvrability and pin-point handling accuracy, especially when weaving in and out of traffic.

Yet the helm also works out on the highway as well, or through tight and twisty turns, with a blend of sporty precision and reassuring control. Keener drivers can scoot around corners at speed and – perhaps surprisingly – not experience excessive body lean, despite the Ignis’ height and narrow track. It instead just knuckles down and gets the job done, with confidence. The Ignis sticks to the road.

We expected scrappy handling but instead received no-drama agility. The chassis feels it can handle a whole lot more power than what the GLX offers. We were also pleased by how comfy the ride is on smooth roads.

However, though mid-corner bumps do not upset the Ignis’ composure, they certainly make themselves felt through inside the cabin. Indeed, around town, in the ‘burbs or out on the highway, the suspension’s inherent firmness that no doubt enhances the Suzuki’s dynamics means sharp, sudden jolts aren’t absorbed as well as we’d like, making for a hard ride at times. There’s less wheel travel from the MacPherson strut-style front and torsion beam rear end set-up than the 1.6-metre height and 180mm ground clearance suggest.

Reducing the amount of road and tyre noise piping through inside would substantially increase the Ignis’ overall appeal. That and level of driver-assist safety tech. 

Two big jobs for its eventual successor, then.

The light SUV category is an interesting one, as it feels somewhat like a gateway to bigger SUVs for those who get a taste of the higher seating position. But in city and urban areas, a light SUV should be as much car as someone needs - unless they have two kids or a bunch of equipment to get around with.

This comes down to the fact cars like the CX-3 are more efficient and easier to manoeuvre than their larger counterparts. And as light SUVs go, the CX-3 feels solid, confidence inspiring and more capable when outside its inner-city comfort zone.

Its naturally aspirated engine is big for the class. Even if it doesn’t feel the punchiest off the line it offers plenty of flexibility at higher speeds and makes overtaking on the highway feel less daunting than it would otherwise be in a car this small.

Its steering is light, which is an advantage in everyday driving, but has enough feedback that more dynamic driving is still engaging. It’s not sportscar-sharp, but you wouldn’t want it to be.

While its age would suggest the CX-3 should feel unrefined compared to newer small cars and light SUVs because of what lies underneath, Mazda’s work on the little SUV over the years has resulted in a car that feels mature and capable.

The suspension isn’t perfect, but it manages low-to medium speeds elegantly and does a decent job of maintaining stability at high speeds. It feels better than you’d expect from a car this size on the highway.

The 1294kg kerb weight and small-enough 18-inch wheels mean there’s not too much weight to manage, and there’s enough cushion in the tyres that harsh bumps don’t come crashing into the cabin.

While the CX-3 feels refined for its class, don’t expect a dead-quiet ride, as some road and wind noise make their way in above 80km/h. Then there’s the fact its engine and transmission will sometimes need to get a bit raucous when accelerating quickly. Aside from this, the CX-3 around town and in suburban areas feels nice and calm.

The Mazda CX-3 is technically unrated by ANCAP, though only because its original maximum five-star rating expired after seven years. While this means it easily passes many of ANCAP’s main criteria for safety (and strict Australian Design Rules - ADRs - to be able to be sold here), the CX-3 is missing some recent, more complex safety features.

Not everything is standard across the line-up, either. The Evolve misses out on adaptive headlights, a surround-view parking camera and traffic sign recognition. The base Pure variant also misses out on a front parking sensor.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other key features like seven airbags, dual-front and front-side plus curtain airbags spanning the sides. The CX-3 also has ABS and emergency braking with forward pedestrian detection and rear cross-traffic alert.

There’s lane departure warning, forward obstruction warning, blind-spot monitoring and a driver attention alert for those times you might miss something or - hopefully not often - are distracted.

All these systems are programmed well to minimise interference while driving, making the CX-3 refreshingly trusting of the driver to actually do the job of driving.

Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, while published basic capped-price servicing is available. Prices start at $239 (years one and five) and reach as high as $329 (year three). Total cost is $1465, averaging out to $293 annually over five years at the time of publishing.

Vehicles under five-years old but with higher mileages up to 90,000km can expect to be charged $499, according to Suzuki’s website.

Mazda offers a five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is behind the curve for a mainstream brand these days. Rival brands like Kia and Hyundai offer seven years, for example, with some offering up to 10.

Servicing is undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first, with servicing costing between $353 and $633 per visit. Total cost over the first seven years currently sits at $3233, averaging $462 a service, which is pricey considering the relatively simple mechanicals under the CX-3.

Mazda says there are more than 150 certified service dealerships across the country, with a tool to find the most convenient one for you. Given the CX-3’s advanced age, chances are there won’t be too many mechanical issues that haven’t been worked out in the last decade.