Subaru BRZ vs Mazda 3

What's the difference?

The Subaru BRZ is a classic modern-day sports car that is a driver’s car through and through. This top-spec tS tester with the litany of accessories is a great example of what’s possible straight from the dealer, but it’s definitely not the best bang for your buck.

Thankfully you still get virtually every benefit the BRZ offers in the entry-level model. You’ll save thousands of dollars which you can use to pay for fuel on a road trip or modify your car exactly how you’d like.

Given how effortlessly it traverses the mainstream and premium small car classes, the Mazda 3 might be the best value small car on the planet.

With racy styling, sports car handling, classy interior presentation and impressive, intelligent efficiency, there’s plenty to sink your teeth into here.

Poor rear vision, a dark back-seat area and smallish boot aside, it doesn’t have any glaring faults.

In a world overrun with SUVs, props to Mazda for evolving the small car so brilliantly to mask a half-decade of existence. Continuous improvements have made the 2024 G25 Evolve SP Vision an essential small car shortlist proposition, regardless of price.

The Subaru BRZ has a timeless exterior design that screams dynamic sports car from every angle.

Even though the second-generation BRZ is around halfway through its lifecycle now, the design is aging like fine wine. It’s also a lovely evolution of the original which dates back to 2011.

The BRZ is low slung, has an aggressive front fascia plus the rear has prominent exhaust pipes. All of this stacks up to make a tough-looking car.

Thankfully this test example is also finished in 'WR Blue' exterior paint, which in my books is still the best colour for a Subaru performance car.

Adding all the genuine accessory goodies onto this car not only amplifies its street appeal, but also harnesses its racing intent. The carbon rear wing in particular has a swan neck design much like the Porsche 911 GT3. Many interested car-spotters craned their necks to get a good look.

Despite this, all the accessories are too flashy for my taste, especially for a car likely to be driven daily. I’d go for the stock look to retain resale, or something subtle like a small rear lip spoiler.

Inside the BRZ has all of the hallmarks of a sports car, as well. These include a steering wheel with minimal buttons, a prominent rev counter and contoured seats.

The manual gear shifter in this car is prominent and nice to hold. It’s great to still see manual options as they’re slowly but surely falling out of favour with buyers.

The manual handbrake is also a nice touch from a design perspective, but it limits overall interior practicality. More on that in a bit.

You can tell the interior is getting a little dated due to the older central multimedia system. But at the end of the day sports cars are more about the driving experience than the flashy tech.

How is it that the current Mazda 3 is already five years old? This hatchback is still stunning, the sort of car you look back at when walking away.

The shape is sleek and almost coupe-like, with a shark-like nose, cab-backward-style long bonnet, upswept shoulder line and a fastback silhouette.

More importantly, it’s the way the light dances across the sculptured sides that draw the eyes in. Bereft of clutter, it makes you wish all mainstream manufacturers had the courage to be so daring.

We’ve said it before – the 'BP'-generation Mazda 3 (Axela in Japan) is the brand’s boldest C-segment hatch since the 1993 'BA' 323 (Astina/Lantis/323F).

But there’s a price to pay for such timeless beauty…

Hopping into the BRZ you’re immediately aware you’re getting into a sports car. It’s low-slung and the driving position feels like you’re almost sitting on the road. Perfect for this kind of machine.

The front seats are beautifully contoured and lock you in for when you’re driving through the twisties. Thankfully, the bolstering isn’t too aggressive and it’s still comfortable for everyday driving.

Ahead of the driver, the leather-wrapped steering wheel has a thin rim and is lovely to hold and turn. There aren’t many buttons but the few that remain are purposeful and have a lovely tactile click.

Behind this there is a 7.0-inch digital instrument cluster that permanently displays the rev counter in the middle. It’s a cool set-up that almost has a retro look to it, plus you’re able to configure the content that is displayed on the left-hand side.

Moving across, the central touchscreen multimedia system is classic Subaru. Nothing revolutionary, but I appreciate the physical shortcut buttons and dials on both sides of the screen.

It’s very easy to navigate around the screen, though as the photos show it is prone to glare, especially in bright scenarios.

Disappointingly there is only wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, with no wireless versions offered. You need to plug your phone in with a USB-A cable in a slot under the split-fold centre armrest.

While this means your phone will reliably charge, rather than having your phone overheat on a wireless charger, there’s no nice spot to put your phone given the physical handbrake takes up so much valuable centre armrest space.

You can put your phone in one of the cupholder spots, but when you do you don’t get a centre armrest. It’s too compromised for my liking.

While I’m on the topic of storage, there isn’t a great deal of it. There’s a small glove box and if you want, you can technically use the backseat area as they’re way too compromised for adults to fit into.

The rear seats are so small I didn’t even bother trying to fit as in my default driving position there is zero legroom. Even kids would struggle.

In terms of boot space, there is 201L available with the rear seats upright. It’s a fine space, though it’s impeded by the full-size spare wheel poking above the load floor. As a result you need to pack around the wheel.

Folding the rear seats makes the boot space more usable, though the envelope to slot things into the boot is narrow.

While the full-size spare wheel impedes the boot area, I’m glad it’s there because it’s much more usable than a dinky space-saver spare wheel or nothing at all. It gives you peace of mind in the event you have a puncture in the middle of nowhere.

There is a price to pay for all this quasi-coupe styling flair, and that’s a comparatively snug-feeling interior, though you’d never call it cramped.

Actually, the Mazda 3 is no less spacious than most of its competition in all but one area, with enough room even for 200cm drivers, along with sufficient shoulder width and ceiling height to match.

If you’re really tall, maybe that missing sunroof isn’t such a bad thing, after all.

Sat so low-down on cushy, enveloping front seats that offer plenty of comfort and support, this is the anti-SUV. Maybe Mazda should have called this the MX-3.

Sporty and spot-on, the driving position is a laid-back affair, with an emphasis on better ergonomics, as emphasised by the thoughtful placement of switchgear that’s all within easy reach, ahead of a beautifully flowing and layered dash. Proudly Japanese in flavour, it brings to mind functional minimalism.

Drilling into some of the 3’s finer interior details, the analogue-look digital instrumentation is super-legible, ultra-classy and gorgeously lit at night. As previously mentioned, the dials and surrounding air vents are reminiscent of the later Porsche 944 and 968.

It’s not just all for the sake of aesthetics, either.

Yes, it’s lovely, but the thinned-rim three-spoke steering wheel feels great to grip, with nifty little paddle shifters that are a delight to prod.

Same goes for the physical volume knob and climate-control buttons, sidestepping the need to get distracted and frustrated by virtual sub-menus.

And having a conventional gear lever with old-school Tiptronic-style shifts suits the 3’s athletic vibe.

Plus, forward vision is A-OK, ventilation is faultless, storage is better than you might expect, and the fit and finish is as good if not better than any of this 3’s German premium opponents.

Out back, the split-fold rear backrest is set at a comfortable angle, the cushion is well padded, and you’re provided with USB ports, air vents, and an armrest with two cupholders. More thoughtfulness.

But while knee room is fair, rear headroom isn’t great if you’re tall or wear a beehive, as the falling ceiling line reveals.

Vision out is limited by that rising window line and fat pillars. Getting in and out of the back requires some contortionist moves. And the small windows mean it can be gloomier in the back than a Smiths album.

Finally, at just 295 litres, the 3’s cargo capacity is disappointing. Sure, it eclipses the Corolla hatch’s 217L cubby, but other rivals are far larger back there.

At least the floor is wide and flat and there are 60/40-split backrests for cabin access for longer items.

Note that a space-saver spare wheel lurks underneath. Mazda argues there’s always the closely-related CX-30 if you need (slightly) more space (317L).

Meanwhile, at the other end of the 3…

Mazda has rationalised the MY24 3 range, with fewer grades and no more manuals, sadly.

The pretty little piece of automotive industrial design you see here is the mid-range Evolve SP Vision, which sounds less like a car and more like a posh hairdryer from Vidal Sassoon.

Priced from $36,520 before on-road costs (or about $41K drive-away before you start haggling), this Mazda 3 is a sporty and well-equipped alternative to the likes of the speedy Hyundai i30 N-Line Premium, spacious Kia Cerato GT Turbo, new Subaru Impreza AWD 2.0R and evergreen Toyota Corolla ZR. All cost roughly the same money.

The thing is, do Mazda’s upmarket aspirations mean the 3 possesses the ride quality and chic to embarrass at times substantially more expensive hatchbacks with premium pretensions? We’re talking rivals like the BMW 1 Series, Mercedes-Benz A-Class, Peugeot 308 and VW Golf, here.

Stay with us, because we reckon you might be surprised by how far the 3 has come since its humble 323 predecessors.

Anyway, this version comes with most of the good gear, including a full suite of driver-assist safety tech like front and rear Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), blind-spot alert, lane-keep assist and adaptive cruise control, as well as keyless start and walk-away lock, powered driver’s seat with memory, 360-degree camera views, a head-up display, digital radio, sat-nav, auto tilt/folding exterior mirrors, dual-zone climate control, Bluetooth phone/audio connectivity and 18-inch alloys.

Oh, and for 2023, an upgraded version introduces a smartphone charger and wireless for the Apple CarPlay/Android Auto function, along with USB-C port access front and rear.

What’s missing at the Evolve SP Vision’s price point? Some mainstream rivals offer leather and a sunroof, available respectively in the more-expensive GT Vision, from $40,000, and flagship Astina grades, from nearly $42,500.

Still, that’s quite a lot of small car for the money, given the quality of the presentation and design. Speaking of which…

Power continues to come from a 2.4-litre naturally aspirated flat-four petrol engine producing 174kW and 250Nm.

This is mated to either a six-speed manual gearbox or a six-speed automatic transmission. Our tester is equipped with the former. Both feature a limited-slip rear differential.

When you think about it, shoehorning a big torquey engine in a light and agile small car is a recipe for fun. Ford did just that with the Escort RS2000 in the 1970s… and Mazda’s now an expert at it, too.

The engine in question is the G25, a 2.5-litre four-cylinder naturally aspirated twin-cam petrol engine, delivering 139kW of power at 6000rpm and 252Nm of torque at 4000rpm.

As this Evolve SP Vision hatch tips the scales at 1415kg, it makes for a healthy, and consequently very lively, power-to-weight ratio of over 98kW/tonne.

That’s if you decide to use all the available revs, which the six-speed torque-converter auto makes great use of.

Driving the front wheels, it offers a 'Sport' mode to extend the revs even more, which is keeping in line with this Mazda’s sporty character.

Less so is the company’s decision to ditch the old multi-link independent rear suspension system a few years back for a more prosaic torsion beam arrangement. We’ll get to how that affects ride and handling in a moment.

Subaru claims the BRZ manual consumes an average of 9.5L/100km on the (ADR 81/02) combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle.

We almost matched this during our largely urban-based testing, achieving an average of 9.7L/100km. There’s a 50L fuel tank which means there’s a total theoretical range of 515km using our as-tested fuel consumption.

A minimum of 98 RON premium unleaded petrol is required which isn’t uncommon for sports cars, but it still hurts your hip pocket nerve.

Mazda claims the G25 averages 6.6L/100km on the combined cycle… for a carbon-dioxide emissions rating of 154g/km. On a 51L tank, that gives a potential distance of over 940km!

Driven good and hard in our hands, we managed 7.5L/100km, which isn’t bad given the speed and conditions it was subjected to.

Plus, the Mazda’s happy on 91 RON 'standard' unleaded petrol.

This is where the BRZ has always excelled and this kitted-out tS manual is no exception.

Firing up with a cold engine, you’re immediately aware this is powered by a horizontally-opposed 'boxer' engine. It has that classic high idle that eventually simmers down once the engine has warmed up a bit.

Setting off you need to acquaint yourself with how this manual gearbox works. Every manual is a little different, however this BRZ is easy to pick up and understand quickly.

I particularly like the notchy and direct gear throw. It makes changing gears easy, fun and engaging.

If I am to be critical, the clutch bite point is a little high and there is a touch too much rev hang when changing gears, especially in the ‘Sport’ drive mode, but you get used to it eventually.

In everyday driving scenarios there is enough power available. Some more wouldn’t go astray due to the lack of a turbocharger, but this constraint makes the car more fun to drive as you have to work harder with the gears.

Speaking of, the gearing is short, which means you will be shifting gears quickly. At 60km/h, for example, the car can be driven around in sixth gear, which is clearly focused on maximising efficiency.

Once you’ve reached your set speed there’s enough torque to maintain it without having to dive back through the gears. This is nice because you don’t have to shuffle through the gears to keep up with traffic.

Out on the open road is where the BRZ comes into its own. The steering in particular highlights how balanced and poised the car feels. It’s so fun to chuck around on twisty bends and feel the weight transfer.

The STI-tuned suspension in this particular trim also highlights how sporty and dialled-in this car is. It can feel a little rough and taut on pimpled urban roads, though you need to remind yourself this is a sports car, not a comfort-oriented SUV.

In a similar vein, at higher speeds there is a lot of road and tyre noise that transfers into the cabin. This is made worse when the rear seats are folded. While more sound insulation would likely fix this, I like it being left out in the name of lighter weight (kerb weight is only 1.3 tonnes).

Ask yourself. What do you want from a new small car?

Since the first Familia of the early 1960s, Mazda’s been at it constantly, through the 1300 and 323 eras and into the modern age of the 3.

The Hiroshima brand knows its stuff. Space, practicality, comfort, ease, reliability and affordability. But a small car has to offer more, specifically in the way it makes the owner feel.

That’s why, while the Focuses, Lancers, Astras and Pulsars are gone, the 3’s still here. And it isn’t just the lush visuals inside and out that are, well, sensory-rich.

As older Alfa Romeo owners know, there’s something special about an engine that sounds alive, and the moment you push the 3’s starter, it purrs into life. That’s the first clue.

Slot the refreshingly old-school lever into Drive, and the G25 leaps into action, and, if you need it to, will keep pulling forward strongly, engine buzzing, like it’s on a mission.

That describes the torquey urge of this big 2.5L four, paired perfectly with the sensibly-geared auto.

We miss Mazda’s magnificent manual immensely, but the 3’s instant response reflects its favourable circa-100kW/tonne power-to-weight ratio.

And, as we’ve harped on in the past, the twin-cam unit’s extra oomph beyond 4000rpm delivers muscular high-speed responses akin to a good turbo – or a great old-school Alfa. You can keep your laggy dual-clutch transmissions, Europe.

Now, sweet, smooth and speedy performance is one thing, but having the chassis tuned with precise and fluid steering for tactile handling, and confident roadholding, backed by nuanced driver-assist and traction controls, are another.

There is a consistent and unifying control to the 3’s linear and forgiving dynamics, reminiscent of past masters like the Focus (and today’s brilliant Peugeot 308) that makes it a joy to drive enthusiastically through fast corners, with the knowledge that it won’t suddenly snap-oversteer and bite an unalert driver back.

For a Mazda, the ride is quiet enough, but there is still some droning transmitted through the cabin, via the Bridgestone Turanza (215/45) tyres, on coarse-chip bitumen surfaces.

And while suspension comfort is pretty impressive for the most part, larger bumps reveal the torsion beam’s limitations, as the car can occasionally thud over them in a way that we remember the multi-link rear end wouldn’t.

Anyway, what we’re saying is that, overall, the 3 Evolve SP Vision is an immersive and interactive driving experience that is right up there with the best of them.

Brawny performance, exquisite agility and a refinement that, collectively, have eluded every small Mazda in living memory until this generation’s 2019 debut. This 3’s right on the money. Still.

Tested way back when this generation was new in early 2019, the Mazda 3 scored a maximum five-star ANCAP crash-test rating.

On the driver-assist front you’ll find front and rear AEB (with a working range of 40km/h to 200km/h) with pedestrian and cycle detection available between 10-80km/h, while the 'Forward Collision Warning' operates from 40-200km/h.

Blind-spot monitoring, lane departure warning, lane-keep assist, 'Forward Obstruction Warning', rear and front 'Cross-Traffic Alert', 'Secondary Collision', auto high beams, breakaway pedals, adaptive cruise control (with full stop/go functionality and cruising/traffic support), parking sensors front/rear, 360-degree round-view monitor, reverse camera, traffic sign recognition, driver monitor and tyre-pressure monitors are also included.

The lane-keep support systems work between 55-200km/h.

Seven airbags – front, side, curtain and a driver’s knee bag – are fitted, along with anti-lock brakes with 'Electronic Brake-force Distribution', 'Emergency Brake Assist', stability control, traction control, hill-start assist are also fitted, seat-belt pretensioners, and two rear-seat ISOFIX points as well as three top tethers for child seat straps.

Subaru BRZ owners are covered by a five-year, 100,000km warranty which is now commonplace in the mainstream segment. Many carmakers are now extending their coverage out to seven years and beyond.

Logbook servicing is required every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. The first five services cost a total of $2595.51, which averages out to around $519 per service. For the performance car space this isn’t cheap but not as exorbitant as more premium offerings.

Subaru has a total of 128 dealers around Australia, with a spread across metro, rural and regional areas.

Mazda offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, with five-years roadside assistance… and that’s nothing special nowadays.

Service intervals are at 12 months or every 15,000km.

A fixed-price service scheme is available, averaging out to $434 annually over the first five years. Mazda shows pricing right up to 16 years and 240,000km on its website.