Renault Kangoo vs Audi Q4 E-Tron

What's the difference?

The latest petrol-powered Kangoo has the pricing, practicality and performance to win friends in Australia’s small commercial van class. If you can afford an option pack or two, like those fitted to our test vehicle, it's even better.

Audi is famous for sticking doggedly to front-wheel drive and quattro AWD, but clearly, when it puts its mind to it, the few RWD machines it has produced over its 116 years have been exceptional.

While not as exciting as the R8 or as supersonic as the e-tron GT, the Q4 e-tron is an impressive machine. Thoroughly engineered and thoughtfully designed to be a friendly, refined, comfortable, safe and capable family SUV, it deserves to be on your shortlist.

With a couple of choice option packages, the base 45 seems remarkably complete, but there’s plenty to enjoy in the hot-shot 55 quattro as well. Either way, Audi seems to be on a winner.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

Our test vehicle is less than 4.5 metres long (4488mm) and well under 2.0 metres in width (1859mm) and height (1830mm), making it ideal for those with either limited parking space and/or needing to access space-restricted areas in their working roles.

Its compact 2716 wheelbase results in an 11.3-metre turning circle. This is larger than you might expect, given it’s no tighter than Toyota’s shortest HiAce mid-sized van.

However, it’s also line-ball with its small van rivals, which highlights the restrictions in steering lock shared by front-wheel drive vehicles compared to rear-wheel drivers like the HiAce.

The Kangoo features MacPherson strut front suspension and its rear suspension uses torsion bar primary springing supplemented by a pair of secondary coil springs for carrying heavy loads. There’s also rack and pinion steering and a quartet of disc brakes.

Bodywork and wheels confirm its no-frills work focus, with unpainted dark grey plastic prominent on the hubcaps, front/rear bumpers and along the sides where bumps and scrapes usually occur.

It has tidy styling for a commercial van, including the sharp cabin design that combines a tasteful blend of grey and satin chrome hard surfaces with the practicality of wipe-clean fabric upholstery and vinyl floors.

Whether talking about the SUV or Sportback, the Q4 e-tron is an excellent example of Audi’s recent design prowess.

Beautiful proportions, crisp surfaces, exquisite detailing and undeniable elegance are all present in spades. And the Sportback is a rare example of a graceful-looking coupe SUV, though it is not in the otherworldly Polestar 4’s league aesthetically.

However, where is the originality? You’d never know these are rear-motored and predominantly RWD vehicles. Yes, the Single Frame grille execution is amongst the best-yet from the brand, while the wheelarch ‘blisters’ are an (albeit questionable) homage to the seminal Ur-Quattro of the 1980s, but the Q4 e-tron could be any contemporary Audi SUV from the Q3 up. Its design is the opposite of daring.

Still, maybe the Q4 e-tron’s classy, relatable conservatism explains why the Brits made this car their second-best selling EV of 2024, representing everything that the number one Model Y is not.

Plus, with current global automotive interiors stalling behind over-illuminated and oversized screens full of greasy fingerprints, glitchy electronics and reflections of their frustrated operators, a bit of old-school Audi cabin presentation knowhow can only be a good thing, right?

Our test vehicle’s 1447kg kerb weight and 2010kg GVM results in a useful 563kg payload rating.

It’s also rated to tow up to 1500kg of braked trailer and with its 3510kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it can carry its maximum payload while towing its maximum trailer weight for optimum versatility.

Cargo bay access is through asymmetric rear barn-doors which can be opened to 180 degrees for forklift and loading dock access, or sliding doors on each side with (according to our tape measure) 625mm openings. The walls and doors are lined to mid-height and there’s internal lighting.

The cargo bay’s load volume is a competitive 3.3 cubic metres and with more than 1.8 metres in length, almost 1.6 metres in width and more than 1.2 metres between the rear-wheel housings, it can easily swallow one standard Aussie pallet or two Euro pallets.

The load floor, which does not include a protective liner as standard equipment, offers a choice of six load-anchorage points.

The solid bulkhead doubles as a sturdy cargo barrier and insulates the cabin from cargo bay noise, most of which comes from the tyres emanating through the rear-wheel housings.

Given its compact dimensions, the cabin is surprisingly spacious and accommodating even for someone my height (186cm), thanks to front doors that open to a full 90 degrees, generous leg and elbow room plus a high roof relative to the seating position that adds to the airy feel.

Storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in the base of each door, single glove box, full-width overhead shelf, large open tray in the centre of the dash-pad and (in standard form at least) a centre console with two cupholders and trays for small items.

However, given our test vehicle is equipped with the optional Business Pack, the standard console is replaced with a more elaborate version, which in addition to a pair of cupholders has a wireless phone-charging dock up front and a box with hinged lid at the back.

There’s also a sizeable clamshell-lid compartment set into the dash-pad ahead of the driver, which includes a smartphone holder on a stalk that can be easily moved to either side of the compartment depending on driver preference.

Our only criticism is the lid on the optional console box. Although it’s been thoughtfully angled downwards at the front to provide the driver with comfortable elbow support, there’s no mechanism on the hinge to hold it in the open position.

This makes it awkward to access the box, as the angled lid naturally wants to keep closing on your hand, so a detent in the hinge would be useful.

And, in a similar context, we’d also like to see hinge detents (or struts) to firmly hold the rear barn-doors open in their 180-degree positions, given their propensity to slam shut if hit by wind gusts during loading/unloading.

This can potentially injure the operator, so these devices should be standard issue, not only for Kangoos but all barn-door vans.

Unlike most of its German competitors (and the Volvo EX40), the Q4 e-tron is built on a dedicated EV platform known as MEB, and shared with other Volkswagen Group models, like the Skoda Enyaq and Volkswagen ID.4.

Consequently, the Audi feels a wee-bit narrow inside, as the MEB SUV family are on the smallish side for medium-sized SUVs. This is not a criticism, just an observation.

And there is no lack of interior space, either. Entry/egress is easy via large doors, there’s plenty of space for heads and shoulders and legroom is generous. All are an upshot of the EV-only platform.

Despite some obvious packaging links with the other VW MEB interiors, the dashboard is very Audi-esque in styling, layout, functionality and quality.

From the ‘Virtual Cockpit’ electronic instruments and crisp multimedia screen, to the feel of the buttons and logical, easy locations of the controls, the Q4 e-tron is completely and utterly on-brand. And that means high standards. Looks posh. Works well. Nice to touch. No bewildering endless screen-menu search and rescue frustration here.

Plus, the Audi is practical. We’ve already talked about ample room, but even the standard, non-sports seats cosseted and supported over a few hours of testing; different and unexpected levels of storage (including a nifty bottle holder ahead of the forward door jam – brilliant); superb ventilation and, especially in the Sportback 55 e-tron quattro sampled, a banging audio system, complete a suave and sophisticated interior experience.

Issues? No too many, really.

There is quite a lot of quality plastic material visible, which might offend some sensitive souls. There is some road-noise intrusion over coarse surfaces, perhaps reminding owners of the Q4 e-tron’s shared architecture; and rear vision in the Sportback is hampered by fat pillars and slim back glass.  

However, no spare wheel exists. Nada. Just the occasionally ineffective and always-infernal tyre inflation kit, that renders the tyre and kit useless afterwards and so makes for expensive replacements. And just because almost everybody else does it, this is not good enough for Australia.

The corollary of that is quite generous luggage capacity, with the Sportback’s 535 litres somehow beating the more-upright SUV’s 520L VDA capacity, though with the rear seatbacks folded that switches to 1460L and 1490L respectively. Both are gorgeously lush and quite practically shaped.

And what about the storage compartment up front?

The Q4 e-tron is available in two body shapes – a handsome if quite conservative wagon SUV style, as well as a sleeker coupe-SUV derivative that Audi calls Sportback.

The latter is expected to be the slightly more popular of the two designs, despite costing about $1600 more.

Obviously slotting in between the smaller Q3 and larger Q5, the Q4 e-tron almost shadows the latter size wise, and is available in either 45 RWD or 55 quattro all-wheel drive (AWD) guises.

Since both share the same, largish (82kWh) battery, Audi reckons most buyers will choose the 45, especially as its pricing in either body style slips under the Australian Federal Government’s Luxury Car Tax (LCT) threshold.

Kicking off from $84,900 before on-road costs, the base grade includes a full suite of safety tech such as full stop/go adaptive cruise control, an electronic instrument display, heated front seats, three-zone climate control, a gesture-controlled powered tailgate and 19-inch alloy wheels.

These come on top of the LED headlights, an 11.6-inch touchscreen, full wireless multimedia connectivity, a premium audio system, electric driver’s seat adjustment, navigation, folding/heated/kerb-side-view mirrors, roof rails and automatic parking.

From the Sportback 45 and up, the S-Line package is standard, bringing with it 20-inch alloys.

All the essentials then.

But, on the base 45s, be prepared to spend extra for luxuries like bolstered “sports” seats, a head-up display, a powered front passenger seat, driver’s side memory settings, a 360-degree camera instead of the regular rear-only view and privacy glass.

The 55 quattro grades from $105,900 include most of these, along with an extra electric motor for AWD and considerably more muscle, as well as variable-ratio steering, Matrix LED headlights, dynamic indicators, extra lane-assist intervention and the aforementioned S-Line trim shod with 20-inch alloys.

Now, against the remodelled Tesla Model Y Juniper, the Audi costs considerably more, but it is also a more upmarket (and less conspicuous) luxury brand that prioritises quality.

The iX1, iX2, EQA and EX40 cost around the same as the Q4 e-tron, but aren’t quite as large, offer smaller batteries (Volvo-aside), are based on other internal combustion engine (ICE) models compared to the Audi’s ground-up dedicated-EV architecture and, except for the BMWs, are getting somewhat long in the tooth.

Conversely, fresh designs, bespoke electric platforms and bigger batteries set the larger yet less-expensive Polestar 4 as well as the more-compact yet loaded Genesis GV60 apart against the Audi’s aforementioned competitors, but neither challenger brand is as established as all the others. Finally, Lexus’ UX300e is too compact while the larger RZ450e has priced itself out of contention here.

So, why the delay getting the Q4 e-tron to Australia? Especially when the brand has offered the bigger and much-more expensive Q8 e-tron SUV since the beginning of this decade?

Initially, demand in Europe was through the roof and supply could not keep up. Then Audi elected to wait for an update that debuted globally in September 2023, ushering in a raft of changes, to make its most important EV ever more competitive in a wildly shifting market.

These include efficiency gains leading to more range thanks to an upgraded motor and battery, stronger performance, faster charging, retuned steering, comfier suspension and improved safety spec.

Not that you’d be able to spot the differences comparing new Q4 e-tron with old. Nor even against sibling SUVs…

The Euro 6 emissions-compliant 1.3-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine produces 96kW at 5000rpm and 240Nm at 1600rpm.

Its seven-speed dual-clutch automatic provides the option of sequential manual-shifting plus three drive modes comprising 'Normal', 'Eco' and 'Performance', which alter the shift calibrations to optimise engine efficiency in each setting. They are selected using a button on the dash.

Unlike the Model Y, there's no storage up front. That space is instead reserved for auxiliaries and, in the 55 quattro versions, the second electric motor that drives the front axle for AWD.

In all versions, a permanently excited synchronous motor sits on the rear axle driving the rear wheels via a single-speed transmission.

Tipping the scales at 2145kg, the 45s produce 210kW of power, to offer a power-to-weight ratio of 98kW per tonne, while the 2235kg 55s’ 250kW output ups that to 112kW/tonne. Both Q4 e-trons deliver a healthy 545Nm of torque.

No slouch, the 45s manage the 0-100km/h sprint in a rapid 6.7s, while the 55 quattro’s extra motor chimes in when extra traction is required, shaving another 1.3s off that, for a 5.4s time. Top speed in both is limited to 180km/h.

Adding a bit more driver involvement, the 55s have variable ratio steering, while MacPherson-style struts up front and a four-link independent rear suspension setup out back help keep everything under control.

Renault claims average combined consumption of 6.4L/100km and the dash display was showing 7.8 when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our 254km test, of which about one third of that distance was hauling more than half a tonne of payload. We also had the annoying engine auto stop/start function switched off for the duration.

Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was higher again at 8.6 which was still within the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between official and ‘real world’ figures.

So, based on our consumption number, you could expect a ‘real world’ driving range of around 630km from its 54-litre tank which should only be filled with premium petrol (min 95 RON).

Built on a 400V architecture, the Q4 e-tron uses an 82kWh Lithium-ion battery pack, offering a useable capacity of 77kWh. It only charges to 80 per cent full to help preserve battery life.

Now, driving most of the available versions over a 200km launch route from Adelaide airport to wine country, we averaged between 17.5 and 19.5kWh/100km, with the lighter RWDs obviously being the more economical of the drivetrains.

In ascending order, the official combined average figures are 16.9kWh/100km (Sportback 45), 17.4kWh/100km (45 SUV), 17.5kWh/100km (Sportback 55 quattro) and 18.1kWh/100km (55 quattro SUV).

Despite weighing about the same, the Sportback uses around 0.5kWh/100km less electricity than the SUV version, due to better aerodynamics.

That translates to about 15km of extra distance, with the Sportback 45 going the furthest, delivering a WLTP range of 540km. That’s followed by the 45 SUV, Sportback 55 quattro and 55 quattro SUV with 524km, 503km and 488km respectively.

To aid with recharging, the driver has three modes of battery energy recuperation via steering-wheel paddle shifters.

Plugged in at home, the battery needs about 40 hours to completely recharge, or over 12 hours using an optional 7kWh Wallbox. Maximum AC charging capacity is 11kW.

With a maximum of between 135kW (RWD) and 175kW (AWD) of DC charging capacity, however, 10-80 per cent charge using a 50kW DC public charger needs fewer than 70 minutes, or just 40 minutes if you find a 100kW station.

Apart from the huge and unavoidable solid-walled blind-spot over the driver’s left shoulder, the Kangoo feels more like a nippy small car than a commercial van.

The driver’s seat has no adjustments for lumbar support or base-cushion rake and the backrest angle is restricted by the bulkhead close behind it, but there’s still enough room even for tall people to find a comfortable driving position.

Its leather-rimmed wheel feels nice in your hands and the unladen ride quality is excellent, with nicely weighted and responsive steering feel, reassuringly strong braking and suspension settings that combine good handling response with supple bump absorption.

The turbocharged 1.3-litre four is a refined and willing performer, albeit with softer response below its peak torque band which is tapped at 1600rpm.

From there it happily spins its way to maximum power at 5000rpm, with the dual-clutch auto getting the best out of this engine in all drive modes, when either unladen or hauling a heavy load.

Its diminutive size and agility are well suited to zipping through heavy city traffic, squeezing into tight loading zones or negotiating narrow and crowded city lanes for delivery work.

Manual sequential-shifting allows more direct control if preferred when hauling heavy loads, or for those simply wanting a more engaging drive experience (particularly in Performance mode).

It's impressively quiet up to 80km/h in city and suburban use, but at highway speeds tyre noise becomes more intrusive (particularly on coarse bitumen surfaces) and some wind noise is evident.

The engine requires only 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h cruising speeds and the (optional) adaptive cruise control is resolute in maintaining its speed settings, even on long and steep descents.

To test its GVM rating, we forklifted 415kg into the cargo bay which with driver equalled a payload of just over half a tonne, or about 50kg under its legal limit.

The rear suspension compressed 55mm, which engaged the long cone-shaped jounce rubbers positioned inside the rear coil springs to provide a second stage of load support.

The Kangoo coped commendably with this payload, floating smoothly over bumps and with minimal effect on handling, braking and engine performance.

It also made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h, quickly self-shifting down to fourth gear to easily reach the summit.

Engine-braking on the way down was not as robust, as you’d expect from such a small engine with more than half a tonne on its back, but still within expectations for small vans.

Our only gripes are the absence of a full-width driver’s left footrest and that the thick panel separating the bulkhead windows almost completely blocks the central mirror’s view through the LHS barn-door. You can option a smart digital mirror with rear-facing camera to resolve this issue, but that’s another $800.

Audi might be late to the affordable electric SUV party, but it’s certainly been worth the wait from behind the wheel, because the Q4 e-tron drives exactly how you would expect an Audi to.

The 45 in either body shape has ample oomph, as its impressive 6.7s 0-100km/h times prove, providing a decent amount of instant speed the moment you put your foot down. This is a smooth, strong and muscular performer.

The steering is nicely modulated and precise, for easy, flowing handling, even when the speed is taken up a few notches. Note that while it may seem a little light, it can be configured for a more dynamic feel.

However, slightly stronger single pedal braking would be appreciated. The Audi EV’s brakes do a great job stopping the car, but they do feel a bit on/off at first. Maybe even a bit wooden.

All the Q4 e-trons we drove on the launch around the Adelaide hills rode on steel springs. That said, and to our surprise, the suspension is more than comfortable enough, soaking up many of the bumps we encountered without breaking a sweat.

Plus, except on coarse bitumen, there's not much of any type of noise coming through inside the cabin. These are agreeably comfortable and refined cruisers.

Meanwhile, the 55 quattro version is a slightly different proposition, with measurably stronger acceleration across the board and more eager throttle response. Actually, even on bone-dry roads at the height of summer, there’s almost too much torque coursing through the axles, so just be wary of this EV’s considerable power.

Still, the twin-motor Audi feels like a relaxed yet brawny grand touring SUV, with plenty in reserve for fast overtaking and quick getaways. Even the RWD model provides exceptional roadholding and control, but that extra AWD grip when things become a bit slippery would certainly be a bonus.

Plus, kudos to the Germans for delivering user-friendly driver assist safety systems. Nuanced and largely unobtrusive, they keep you safe without driving you to distraction. China and Polestar in particular, are you listening?

On the flip side, you do feel the extra weight of the second electric motor (about 100kg more), and so it doesn't quite have the agility and alacrity of the standard 45 RWD machine.

Indeed, there isn’t quite the athleticism or connection of driver-focused alternatives (like BMW), but the Q4 e-tron rarely puts a foot wrong, either.

Impressively capable and dynamic, Audi’s more-affordable electric SUV has been worth the wait.

The Kangoo petrol is backed by a five year/200,000km warranty, whichever occurs first. There's also complimentary roadside assist for up to four years/120,000km, with annual renewals available after that.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/30,000km with capped-pricing for the first five scheduled services totalling $2385, or an average of $477 per year.

Audi’s warranty remains the same as before, at five years with unlimited kilometres, with the battery covered for eight years or 160,000km. Six years of roadside assistance is also included.

Service intervals are every two years or 30,000km. Nothing special here nowadays.

But the Q4 e-tron owner can buy a six-year service plan for a total of $2050, while gaining 12 months of free electricity at Chargefox stations. They can also purchase a JET Charge home installation charger from $800.