Renault Duster vs Nissan Juke

What's the difference?

The Renault Duster 4x4 Evolution (manual) is a driver’s car. Lots of fun for day-to-day duties and a real visceral experience if you like to have a few laughs on loose-dirt and gravel tracks. And it’s adequately capable for off-roading adventures. It also has more than its fair share of cheeky charm.

Obviously it’s not anywhere near the most capable off-road vehicle available. That’s not what it’s intended to be. But it’s one of the most fun to drive on- and off-road.

And for $36,490 (excluding on-road costs), you’ll still have cash enough for a set of all-terrain tyres and some accessories.

The Juke is a fun little car. It looks cool, it packs most of the important features and safety equipment, but while it can be fun to drive, it’s also a little clunky around town.

It’s so frustrating, because there is a great car in there somewhere, and it would take only small tweaks and enhancements to bring it out.

From the outside, the Duster 4x4 Evolution has that special ‘something’ that draws your eye. It’s unassuming, yet somehow eye-catching.

It’s a chunky little AWD with ‘Renault’ across the front grille and its raised stance gives the Duster a rugged presence.

Hard angles and nifty touches, such as the concealed rear door handles on the C-pillar, add to its funky exterior.

The Duster’s interior continues the minimalist theme with hard plastic surfaces everywhere – including the dash and door armrests – and black and grey cloth upholstery, all amid a neat but uncluttered layout.

The 10.1-inch multimedia touchscreen , angled slightly towards the driver, dominates up front and caps off what is an unpretentious, functional cabin.

Urban style is clearly what the Juke is about. It’s always been about this, but the original incarnation, while unusual, was a bit bulbous and awkward. The current version is a razor-sharp re-interpretation of the original.

Ugly duckling no more, the Juke blends the elements of Nissan’s current design language with its own unique take, in a clever way.

The roofline and bulbous face of the original car, complete with its ‘eye’ headlights are all maintained, but this time they look more contemporary with a splash of chrome and gunmetal plastic in the face, offset by gloss blacks running down the doorline.

The new light fittings look great and the curviness is also gently off-set with some sharp angles. The massive 19-inch wheels finished in a two-tone gloss black and aluminium brush keep this car looking like a concept come to life. Just don’t crash them into the curb. It would be very easy to.

The cool elements continue inside, with rotary air vents, a blend of textures, including a gloss grey for the vent claddings, with white stitching for the wheel, seat, and into the door cards, too.

There are touches of chrome about the place, and an ambient red LED light surrounding the shifter, which sits on its own little pedestal thing.

It’s quirky and punches above its weight when it comes to soft trims in the doors. Like most higher-grade Nissans the seats are pretty comfy, too, clad in a hard-wearing synthetic leather material.

But it won’t be for everyone, and it’s not without its downsides. The abundance of grey plastic down the centre console is a bit cheap, and the tech offering doesn’t match the youthful style.

The centre screen is adequate, but compared to many rivals it’s a bit small and dull, and the Juke is still missing a digital overhaul for its instrument cluster.

The black headlining, usually reserved for sportier cars, makes the cabin feel smaller than it is.

The interior in Evolution trim matches the Duster’s no-nonsense adventure-focussed approach. It’s spartan but user-friendly.

The front seats are manually adjustable and the cloth upholstery looks like it’s hard-wearing and likely able to cope with the utter messiness of life.

I had trouble getting my phone to work via the 10.1-inch multimedia unit, but otherwise I have few complaints about the system as it’s easy enough to operate. There’s a wireless-charging pad below the screen. There are also two USB-C charging ports up front and two for rear-seat passengers, as well as two 12-volt sockets one in the front and another in the rear cargo area.

There is a mix of physical buttons and on-screen controls to operate various in-cabin functions, such as air-con.

For storage there is a glove box, a deep centre console, two cupholders, and a small shelf for your pocket clutter.

The second-row seats are roomy enough for two adults or three teens across the row and while passengers there have access to two USB-C charging ports and air vents, there’s no fold-down centre armrest.

The rear cargo area is accessed via a manual tailgate and is claimed to offer 358 litres of cargo volume when the rear seat is in use and 1424 litres when the second-row seat is stowed away.

Payload in the Duster Evolution 4x4 is listed as 503kg. The cargo area has a light, cargo hooks and a 12V socket. This Duster has a 215/70 R16 spare stored underfloor.

The Juke is a small SUV in the true sense of the word, sitting below the Qashqai which is more like a mid-sizer these days in terms of dimensions.

However, it’s quite cleverly packaged on the inside and is more useful than it first appears.

The front seats, for example, offer heaps of headroom and a surprising amount of width, and while the seats are manual, they’re pretty adjustable. I was able to find a great seating position.

There are big pockets in the doors with an integrated bottle holder suitable for even the largest bottles, although the centre console area is a bit less versatile, choosing its funky design over additional storage.

It features two good bottle holders, but a tiny armrest box and a shallow tray with one 12V socket and a USB-A outlet, as well as an auxiliary audio input under the climate controls.

On the topic of climate controls, I love the fact the Juke maintains a dedicated ventilation panel complete with buttons and dials for all the core functions. No touchscreen nonsense here.

The media screen, as mentioned, is a tad small, and falls victim to glare easily.

The stock Nissan software is a massive upgrade on the brand’s previous-generation products, but while it’s functional it’s far from the prettiest or the fastest on the market.

The back seat offers more space than you might assume, but it’s not as well thought-out as the front of the cabin. At 182cm tall I fit behind my own driving position with just enough space for my knees and just enough headroom.

There are decent bottle holders in the doors, and a further two small ones in the drop-down armrest. The backs of the front seats are clad in that synthetic leather material, which is nice, and have soft pockets, too.

The back of the front centre console offers just a single USB-A outlet and a small cubby. There are no adjustable air vents for rear passengers. It also feels a little claustrophobic back there thanks to the black trim on everything and smaller windows.

Boot capacity for the Juke is impressive for an SUV in this class, with 422 litres on offer, which is close to the volume we’d expect from something a size-bracket up, and 1305L with the second row folded down. There is a space-saver spare under the boot floor.

The Juke range kicks off from just $28,390 which gets you into a base ST and reaches to $36,890 for the top-spec Ti.

We’re driving the $34,440 (before on-road costs) ST-L which is the upper mid-grade car.

It scores concept-style 19-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch digital screen between the analog dials, a surround camera system, single-zone climate, keyless entry and push-start ignition, and LED headlights. 

The quite attractive ‘Magnetic Blue’ paint our car wears is a $700 option. For an additional $1133 you can also step up to the ST-L+ grade which adds alternate two-tone seat trim, chrome and black highlights and a 10-speaker Bose audio system.

While this ST-L grade gets the lion’s share of Juke equipment without the price-hike to the Ti (and is therefore the pick of the range) there are some notable items missing at this price.

For example, there’s no wireless phone charging, no head-up display, no fully digital instrument cluster, and no electrical adjustment for the seats. The 8.0-inch multimedia screen is starting to look a bit dated, too.

Still, it looks trendy and those massive wheels are well above the standard for a car at this size or price. So, if you’re going for style over equipment there is a choice to be made here.

Nissan also hasn’t cheaped out on safety equipment, with most active stuff coming standard, even on the base ST. More on this later.

Pricing is about line-ball with its most direct competitors. It’s a tad cheaper than some like the outgoing similarly-styled Toyota C-HR (Koba 2WD - $35,695), or slightly more expensive than others like the current equivalent Ford Puma (ST-Line - $33,190) or Mazda CX-3 (Touring SP - $34,300) although it is also ever so slightly larger than those last two by width, height, and wheelbase.

The Duster 4x4 Evolution has a 1.2-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with a 48V mild-hybrid system (producing 96kW at 4500rpm and 230Nm at 2250rpm) matched to a six-speed manual gearbox.

As I said earlier, a new small 4x4 SUV with off-road capability and a manual gearbox is refreshing.

This Duster has an all-wheel drive system and the little 1422kg SUV can do the 0-100km/h sprint in a claimed 11.94 seconds.

In the Juke’s messy engine bay lies a 1.0-litre, three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine which sends 84kW/180Nm to the front wheels.

Nissan has its own 'HR10DET' engine code for this unit but it’s actually a Renault 'H5Dt' engine as evidenced by Renault logos all over the place.

Power is communicated by a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic which has been a source of strife for this car since it arrived. This very European engine and transmission combination is one which the Juke shares with its Renault Captur cousin.

I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but I would prefer a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which Nissan uses elsewhere in its range. It would solve maybe the main issue with this car, which we’ll explore up next in the driving section of this review

Official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption is 5.7L/100km.

On test, we recorded 6.7L/100km but we did do a half-day of light off-roading.

This Duster 4x4 has a 55-litre fuel tank so, going by that on-test fuel figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 820km out of a full tank.

The turbocharged 1.2-litre mild-hybrid three-cylinder engine requires 95 RON premium unleaded petrol.

One of the reasons this car comes equipped with a dual-clutch automatic is to chase fuel efficiency as well as emissions output. On paper DCT autos don’t suffer the inherent losses of a traditional torque converter transmission.

The official combined cycle fuel consumption figure is 5.8L/100km. My week of driving, weighted slightly more towards freeway conditions, produced a marginally higher average of 6.8L/100km. It’s not the claim, but it’s pretty good.

This little engine requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel, and the Juke has a 46-litre fuel tank, suggesting a driving range of 793km using the official fuel consumption number.

My kids are learning to drive in a manual because I reckon being able to drive a manual vehicle remains an important skill to have. I only own manual cars at this point in time and it’s nice to see new cars with manual gearboxes haven’t been done away with just yet.

This all-wheel drive adventure machine is light at 1422kg and punchy, working through a turbocharged 1.2-litre mild-hybrid three-cylinder engine (producing 96kW at 4500rpm and 230Nm at 2250rpm) and a six-speed manual gearbox.

It’s sporty, with precise steering, crisp throttle response and nicely controlled ride and handling. And it’s a whole lot of fun to drive on sealed surfaces.

Throwing it around corners at (legal) speed is a barrel of laughs and driving on fast loose-dirt tracks is damn good for rally-style hilarity, all with the gruff backing track of this little AWD’s tractable petrol engine. Driving the 4345mm long, 2069mm wide and 1650mm high Duster feels like you’re punching a go-kart around a track, in a good way.

The Duster’s suspension deserves a mention here because this package, including an independent multi-link set-up at the rear, yields a firm but well-balanced overall feel.

Its tight turning circle makes it supremely easy to accomplish quick manoeuvres without fuss and it’s also a cinch to park.

Visibility from the driver’s seat is somewhat reduced through different angles to the rear and back along the vehicle’s side, but you get used to that. It doesn’t help that the camera view is muddy looking on the screen.

Those niggles aside, did I mention it’s fun to drive?

It’s not too shabby in low-speed off-road scenarios, either. The Duster is similar to Subaru’s Crosstrek and XV or the Jimny, in that this Renault’s intended use is not as a hardcore rock-crawling beast, it’s not engineered for that sort of thing.

The Duster's all-wheel drive system is well calibrated and quietly effective at detecting wheel-slip and delivering a smooth response. Driven with care, this AWD SUV is capable of off-roading at a level that will surprise some.

It has a 4x4 terrain control system with five modes – 'Auto', 'Eco', 'Mud & sand', 'Snow' and 'Off-road' – as well as a hill descent control system. None of these are engineered to turn the Duster into an off-highway mongrel but they ensure it's able to cope with mild to less-mild off-roading.

The Duster’s ground clearance (212mm) and off-road angles (31-degree approach and 36-degree departure) make it better suited to tackling off-road terrain of the light-to-moderate variety rather than door-sill deep mud holes and the like.

For reference, the Suzuki Jimny has 210mm of ground clearance and approach and departure angles of 37 and 49 degrees. The Crosstrek has 220mm of ground clearance, and approach and departure angles in the off-road-focussed Wilderness of 23.5 and 25.5 degrees.

But it’s still very capable if driven with consideration and well within the limits of its physical dimensions and off-road traction control.

Light off-roading (well-maintained gravel roads and dirt tracks in dry conditions) is fine because that’s well within the Duster’s capabilities and it results in little to no wear and tear on the vehicle.

While the Duster can handle short bursts on firm-packed sand (which I test here), sand-driving puts extra stress on any vehicle, and AWDs don’t have a lot of ground clearance, so they’re prone to bellying out on tall crests in between deeper wheel ruts on a beach.

My advice? Avoid anything beyond a well-maintained dirt track in dry weather and don’t take on any ‘4WD/ high ground clearance only' tracks, prolonged sand-driving or rock-crawling. Anything more rigorous than that and you risk damage to the vehicle’s underbody at a minimum, and mechanical damage and personal injury at worst. You’ve been warned.

The Duster’s off-road capabilities could easily be further enhanced with a set of decent light truck all-terrain tyres but, be aware, even aggressive rubber won’t turn it into a gung-ho off-roader.

For the record, it has unbraked trailer towing capacity of 750kg and braked towing capacity of 1500kg. Maximum towball download is listed as 75kg.

A bonus for Duster owners is that it can be kitted out for adventure via either Renault’s range of accessories – including all-weather floor mats, roof box, roof racks etc – or through Australia’s aftermarket industry.

The Juke can be fun to drive, and I wanted to like it more, but the transmission its peppy little engine is paired with is frustrating.

Outputs of 84kW/180Nm doesn’t sound like a lot, but power isn’t the problem. The little engine has a fun turbo-surge which pairs with the Juke's light frame to make for a car which is quite athletic when you push it.

The issue is a mountain of turbo-lag conspires with the clunky dual-clutch automatic to make it far too sluggish off the line.

There’s a full second (or two, at times) to wait for any power to arrive, which simply isn’t good enough at T-junctions and roundabouts, the kind of situations a little urban SUV like this will constantly be encountering.

Nissan says the transmission software was even updated after the Juke’s launch, but it’s still not where it should be.

It has good traits, too. When you’re out on the open road, it has quick, snappy and well-defined shifts, and the engine is much better when it’s being properly pushed, too.

It has a gruff, entertaining tone, and the Juke’s light frame, firm ride, and comparatively heavy steering make it a joy to throw into some corners.

The long wheelbase for such a small SUV, paired with a decent set of tyres, also keeps it confident when its predecessor was a little clumsy.

Again, though, the reasonably hard ride, not helped by the very large wheels, isn't its best trait in an urban environment. The Juke is by no means uncomfortable, it just seems like the priorities for this little SUV aren’t in the right place.

I’ve said this before but there’s a great car in here somewhere. The Juke is fun to drive in the right environment, it’s just this environment is not where most prospective buyers will primarily be looking to use it.

What could fix this issue? A different transmission perhaps. Better yet, an e-Power hybrid powertrain.

The Juke's standard active safety features include freeway-speed auto emergency braking, lane departure warning with lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control and traffic sign recognition.

Last time I reviewed this car I complained about the way it vibrates the steering wheel when the lane keep function decides you’re going out of your lane. But having since experienced so many more invasive lane keep systems, this one seems comparatively low-key.

Elsewhere, the Juke gets the standard array of six airbags (dual front, side, and curtain) and wears a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2019 standards.

A five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty with five years of roadside assistance applies to the Duster. That's average for the mainstream market.

Servicing appointments are set at 12 months/30,000km intervals, whichever occurs soonest.

Capped price servicing applies to the first five services with a total cost calculated at $2475 for the all-wheel Duster, with an average per-service cost of $495, which is getting up there for a car in this price bracket.

Renault has more than 70 dealerships across Australia.

Nissan offers the Juke with a five-year, unlimited km warranty, with five-years of roadside assist included.

It requires servicing every 12 months or 20,000km and the cost is subject to a capped price servicing program for the first six years.

This averages $651.33 annually, which is not cheap for a small SUV in this class.

However, there is also the option of a pre-paid five-year service plan which brings the annual cost over five years down to a more reasonable $429.60.

But, notably, it does not include the pricy $1521 sixth-year interval. It’s worth asking yourself how long you’ll own the car for before splurging on it.