Peugeot Partner vs Nissan Navara

What's the difference?

It might not be the most modern looking or feeling small van, but amongst its competitors, the Partner stands out for its relative value and load-lugging capabilities.

It’s somewhat fun to drive but now feels a bit plain on the inside, and could benefit from a few extra options and features to make it more comfortable and maybe even a little more customisable.

Still, I think the Peugeot Partner will fit the needs of many primarily city-based small businesses or tradies who want to work out of a compact and easy-to-drive van instead of an unwieldy and often overkill dual-cab ute.

The D27 Nissan Navara represents badge engineering at its best or worst, depending on your point of view regarding platform sharing. However, when assessed purely on its merits as a standalone tool of trade, the entry-level SL is a competent and economical workhorse that’s worthy of at least cross-shopping with the major players.

The Partner’s recent update brings with it a new, more contemporary face, with the ‘claw’ style light fittings clasping a body-coloured panel in place of the usual grille fitting. It also updates all the badgework to match the French brand’s passenger car range.

Thanks to these upgrades, as well as the fetching colour and Premium body-matching highlights, it looks pretty schmick at a distance, but up close you can start to tell the Partner’s relative age.

It simply doesn’t look as contemporary or coherent in its design as the much newer ground-up fifth-generation Caddy or third-generation Renault Kangoo with which it competes.

A big part of this is due to the Partner being based on a much older platform which is shared across a lot of Stellantis brands. It started life as the third-generation Citroen Berlingo in 2018, and needs to warp its look overseas to fit the Fiat Doblo, Toyota Proace and Vauxhall Combo (although the Partner is the only version sold in Australia).

As a result, up close you can see its somewhat pieced together brand identity bits and boxy, upright bodywork.

There are some odd touches, like the plastic bumper at the front not matching the gloss black highlights or body coloured bumper at the rear, and the contemporary badgework finished in a matt grey adds yet another texture and colour to the mix.

The theme continues inside, with a huge plastic dash piece jutting into the cabin space. Here, the bits from Peugeot’s passenger car range have been integrated, including the cool 'squircle' steering wheel, digital dash elements and the multimedia screen.

In the centre, the electric shifter part from cars like the current 2008 small SUV has been embedded in the sea of plastic.

It technically matches the brand identity, but it doesn't stop the Partner’s interior from feeling a bit cobbled together, rather than the more unified corporate identity which is so well executed in the VW Caddy, which is almost hard to tell apart from a Golf.

The software is another area the Partner could use some work. It’s fairly simple and straightforward to use, but the layout isn’t very customizable, both for the multimedia suite and digital dash.

Again, the Caddy runs rings around Peugeot in this department, with its more impressively-featured and nicer-looking software it shares with other VW Group passenger cars.

There are also little areas which feel like they’re behind the pace for a top-spec variant. The steering wheel is hard plastic without even the option for a softer wrap, for example, and the Caddy offers an alternate optional synthetic leather seat trim for an operator willing to dish out a little extra cash.

It looks like a base model Triton GLX given the Navara SL’s modest front and rear styling tweaks, which are not as substantial nor convincing as platform-sharing rivals like Mazda’s BT-50 or Volkswagen’s Amarok in creating a clear visual distinction from its donor.

Nissan has been equally economical with interior changes. Even so, the work-focused cabin is functional and reasonably spacious for a dual cab, with splashes of satin chrome combined with white upholstery stitching and fake carbon-fibre surfaces providing a touch of style to predominantly grey tones.

So design-wise the Partner might barely hit the brief when it comes to matching it up with Peugeot passenger car design, but one area where it manages to shine is in-cabin storage.

There’s lots on offer, massive bottle holders and pockets in the doors, storage areas galore in the big plastic dash, with trays in the centre and passenger side, as well as behind the multimedia screen and under the shifter.

There are a set of non-variable bottle holders cut out of the top of the dash, as well as hidden storage compartments under both front passenger seats.

I should mention at this point the Partner has a three-across front bench, although actually putting three people in there will be quite the squeeze, especially given the centre of the dash juts quite far into the cabin area, leaving the centre occupant with nowhere to put their knees.

Maybe it will suit a child in a pinch if you plan to have this as a small business vehicle which may need to be dual-purpose from time to time.

There’s also a fold-down rotating table thing in the backrest of the centre position, designed to be used with a laptop. Another feature of the Partner’s dash is physical toggles and buttons for the climate controls, which are increasingly rare in favour of touch-based menus.

In terms of load area dimensions, the Partner LWB offers 3.9 cubic metres (excluding the bulkhead) and dimensions come in at 2167mm long, 1527mm wide (1229 between the arches) and 1243mm tall. This should accommodate two Euro-sized palettes.

Loading and securing should also be relatively breezy thanks to sliding doors on both sides, a barn door rear which hinges out of the way for forklift loading, and no less than 10 tie down rings.

It also scores decent LED lighting in the roof, so you can see what you’re doing in a poorly lit warehouse, or when using the load area at night.

As for capacities, the Partner LWB has a payload of 898kg. It claims a 950kg braked towing capacity (not much more than the unbraked of 740kg) although in reality 740 seems to be closer to the limit thanks to the 74kg towball download rating.

How does this compare to the Caddy? I was surprised to find the Caddy 5 in equivalent LWB form has a smaller load area (3.7 cubic metres) and a significantly lower payload of 695kg.

However, it can tow slightly more (up to a claimed 1500kg - however has a 75kg max towball download). Additionally, the Partner isn’t able to be fitted with a tailgate to replace the barn doors (an option which some buyers may prefer on the Caddy).

A full size spare wheel is present on all variants to keep you on the road.

With its 2126kg kerb weight and 3190kg GVM our test vehicle has a useful 1064kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine one tonner.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 6250kg GCM rating (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) it would require a sizeable 440kg reduction in vehicle payload to tow its maximum trailer weight.

Not that many (if any) owners of utes this size would need to tow 3500kg but it’s important to be aware of these numbers when towing heavy trailers to avoid dangerous and illegal overloading.

The Navara’s load tub is almost square with its 1555mm length and 1545mm width. It’s also 525mm deep and with 1135mm between the rear wheel housings it can’t fit a standard Aussie pallet but will carry a Euro.

Our test vehicle does not come standard with a tub-liner so its painted surfaces are prone to scratches and dents. There’s four anchorage points for securing loads and the tailgate assist feature allows easier lowering and raising.

The driver and front passenger share good space and comfort, with storage that includes a bottle holder and bin in each door plus a large open shelf above the single glovebox and an overhead glasses holder. The centre console offers flat storage with two USB ports and a 12v socket up front, along with two cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back.

Rear seating is also comfortable and surprisingly spacious for tall people, given I’m 186cm and when seated behind the driver’s seat when set in my position I have ample knee and headroom. However, shoulder room is tight for three adults, which is tolerable for short trips but a maximum of two would be preferable for longer drives.

Rear passenger storage includes a bottle holder and bin in each door plus pockets on each front seat backrest. There’s another 12v socket in the rear of the centre console and the centre seat’s backrest folds forward to serve as an armrest with dual cupholders.

The bench seat’s base cushion is fixed, so unlike numerous rivals it can’t swing up and be stored vertically if more internal carrying space is required.

The fifth generation Navara, which is available only in 4x4 dual-cab ute configuration, comes in four model grades comprising SL ($53,348 plus on-road costs), ST ($56,765), ST-X ($63,177) and Pro-4X ($68,418) designed to cater for commercial applications through to lifestyle/recreational use.

Our test vehicle is the entry-level SL with its list pricing in the same ballpark as workhorse equivalents from major players including the Ford Ranger XL 2.0L auto ($51,130), closely related Triton GLX 2.4L auto ($51,640), Isuzu D-Max SX 2.2L auto ($52,200) and Toyota HiLux Workmate 2.0L auto ($53,990).

Like its Navara siblings it's available only with a 2.4-litre bi-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine and six-speed automatic transmission. 

The SL's work-focused standard features include 17-inch steel wheels with 265/65R17 all-terrain tyres and a full-size spare wheel, LED headlights/daytime running lights/tail-lights, tailgate assist, 360-degree camera and front/rear parking sensors to name a few.

The interior is also designed with hard work in mind with its wipe-clean vinyl floor and black fabric trim but there’s also creature comforts like remote keyless entry, single-zone climate control, second-row air vents, power-adjustable lumbar support for the driver’s seat, multi-function steering wheel controls and more.

There’s also multiple USB ports and 12v sockets, a 7.0-inch instrument cluster display and a 9.0-inch touchscreen to control the four-speaker multimedia system which includes wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity and DAB+ digital radio.

There is just one combustion engine option in the Partner range, a three-cylinder 1.2-litre turbocharged petrol unit producing 96kW/230Nm which drives the front wheels via an eight-speed automatic transmission.

The only alternative to this is the E-Partner which sports a 100kW/260Nm electric motor instead.

The three-cylinder petrol is a perky unit sourced from Peugeot’s passenger car line-up, although the Partner range doesn’t quite offer the VW Caddy’s breadth of options; the choice of a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol or a 2.0-litre diesel in two states of tune.

The Navara’s 2.4-litre four-cylinder ‘bi-turbo’ diesel engine is equipped with two turbochargers which work in sequence to boost efficiency, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one optimising response at higher rpm.

It produces 150kW of power at 3500rpm and its sizeable 470Nm of torque is served at full strength between 1500-2750rpm. It’s also Euro 6B emissions compliant using AdBlue.

This is paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic, offering the choice of sequential manual shifting which can be preferable when hauling and/or towing heavy loads particularly in hilly terrain.

The 4x4 system is dual-range, part-time offering 2H (2WD High Range), 4H (4WD High Range) and 4L (4WD Low Range) selected by a dial on the centre console, where you’ll also find a button to engage the locking rear diff.

The most significant differences between the Triton and Navara are in suspension design and tuning, with the D27 Navara replacing the previous D23 generation’s coil-spring rear end with the Triton’s more traditional leaf-spring arrangement.

Nissan has also collaborated with Melbourne-based engineering partner Premcar in developing three unique suspension tuning packages focused on damper (aka shock absorber) refinement, aimed at enhanced steering response, handling stability and ride comfort.

The premium Pro-4X and mid-grade ST-X each have unique settings while the work-focused SL and ST share the same calibration designed for hauling loads, including heavy-duty four-leaf rear suspension. All model grades also feature electric power steering.

One of the key downsides of the Peugeot’s Euro-compliant turbo-petrol engine is it requires mid-shelf 95RON fuel, which could be a blow to those who want to drill down on running costs.

Claimed fuel consumption on the official combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle is decent, at 6.3L/100km. Ours spent the week mainly urban commuting and landed closer to the official urban number of 7.3L/100km with a total of 7.2L/100km over a few hundred kilometres.

The 60-litre fuel tank should allow for roughly 950km of driving range at the official consumption. More like 830km using our test figure.

Nissan claims combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km but the dash display was showing 9.4 at the completion of our 496km test, which included our usual mix of suburban, city and highway driving of which about one third was hauling a near maximum payload.

Our own consumption figure, based on fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, came in slightly lower at 9.1L/100km which is comfortably within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between manufacturer claims and real-world consumption and excellent economy from mostly metro driving.

So, based on our test results, we estimate the Navara SL has a real-world driving range of more than 800km from its 75-litre tank.

One thing which I always like about these little European vans for trades is they’re usually very humane and easy to drive compared to a dual-cab or a van in a larger market segment.

They tend to offer closer to the feel of a passenger car, with some of the little luxuries which are missing in big hollow diesel units like some form of refinement and less noise.

The Partner is no different, and shone in some ways I did not expect.

The brand has done a good job of making it feel like a Peugeot passenger car from a touch-point perspective with the dash elements and the small chuckable steering wheel.

It also has a swift steering ratio, making even this LWB version feel nimble and agile for darting around corners and down tight laneways just as I’m sure its French creators envisaged.

The peppy three-cylinder engine helps the hatch-like feel. It offers a punchy turbo surge and a satisfyingly gruff soundtrack, which makes this little commercial offering quite fun to drive.

The ride is also remarkably smooth for a commercial vehicle, even completely unladen. Car-like suspension handles the bumps and potholes of the city environment well, which could make this a good choice for delivery drivers who will spend a lot of time in urban environments, and maybe are less concerned about getting so close to the GCM rating.

However, it’s not quite as polished as the Caddy, which won me over big time when the fifth generation version arrived in 2022.

The Peugeot can suffer from significant bouts of turbo lag, and its eight-speed transmission can be occasionally jerky from a stand-still, making for the odd awkward moment at T-junctions and roundabouts where this van takes a second to get going again. 

Additionally, some of the fun, refined feeling wears away over time as you constantly come into contact with the hard plastic trims of the interior, and the scratchy urethane steering wheel.

This can get a bit jarring over a full day of driving. It’s for this reason VW puts a leather-bound steering wheel in even basic versions of the Caddy these days.

The software also leaves a lot to be desired, with minimal customisation and laggy interfaces.

Sure, the reality is you’ll spend most of your time working with Apple CarPlay or Android Auto which worked perfectly in my time with the car, but it would be nice to have more customisation for the dash and a few nicer menus for the multimedia screen.

All in all, then, it’s a nice little van to drive, and is excellent at urban duties, but it has a slightly industrial character which will eventually catch up with you after a long day behind the wheel.

The Caddy is better in pretty much every way behind the wheel, but then it also costs over $5000 more in equivalent spec and can't carry as much stuff.

Large handles on the A pillars assist climbing aboard into a comfortable and spacious driving position, enhanced by steering wheel and seat adjustments (including power lumbar support) plus a left footrest, which ideally could be a tad wider.

The claimed ride and handling changes resulting from Premcar’s suspension tuning are so seamless they would be hard for most Navara drivers to define. All that matters is how it feels behind the wheel.

And I must say it’s a nice thing to drive, which is consistent with all the Premcar-enhanced D23 Navaras we've tested before it, combining excellent steering feel with supple yet responsive ride and handling whether unladen or loaded.

The switch to electric power steering also provides a noticeably light turning effort when parking which becomes increasingly firm with a stronger self-centering effect at highway speeds, like all variable-ratio systems should.

The six-speed auto’s gearing optimises performance in urban use by keeping the engine operating within its peak torque band most of the time, which ensures a consistently energetic response. It’s also a relaxed highway cruiser, requiring less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h where low noise levels allow conversations without raised voices.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 650kg into the load tub, which combined with our crew of two equalled a total payload of 830kg that was still more than 200kg below its legal limit. The heavy-duty rear springs only compressed about 30mm under this loading, which ensured ample bump-stop clearance and no bottoming out on our test route.

Its handling remained surefooted and predictable when hauling this payload, which, combined with the Navara’s hearty 470Nm, ensured it made light work of our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km long set climb. It also provided strong engine braking on the way down, so overall it proved to be a competent load hauler.

The only negative from a driver’s perspective is the Navara’s inheritance of the Triton’s annoying driver distraction monitor, which even beeped and prompted me to ‘please look forward’ when I dared to look at the central and passenger door mirrors when overtaking another vehicle. Seriously? It’s ironic that a driver distraction monitor can be distracting, but it is.

The Nissan Navara comes standard with a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty but up to 10 years/300,000km with matching roadside assist is available if the car is serviced at Nissan dealers.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km with capped pricing applicable for the first five scheduled services totalling $2495, or an average of $499 which is competitive with numerous well established rivals.

Nissan Australia has a large network of around 180-200 dealers which includes every state and territory.