Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Puma

What's the difference?

So, should you give up on the Qashqai e-Power, or surrender to its many and varied charms? Well, when the Japanese brand really tries, as it clearly has here, Nissan can be as imaginative and as innovative as any carmaker on the planet.

And given the latest Qashqai out of Europe is so advanced and unique within its SUV category, this deserves to be on everybody’s shortlist. With e-Power under that pretty bonnet, this Ti is a leader, not a follower. This underdog could win best-in-show!

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer with accommodation and meals provided.

If a minimum price and maximum interior space are your priorities, then the Puma is not for you. Especially so in the flagship ST-Line V, which may seem too small and a tad cramped compared to, say, a Seltos, C-HR or ASX.

Where the Ford excels, typically, is in the way it encourages the keen driver while cosseting four occupants (and a surprising amount of their cargo). There's a poise and maturity to the way the Puma moves that puts it on a par with or even beyond some premium compact SUVs. Even the styling is a statement. If the badges (and dashboard) were covered, you might be convinced this cat is actually a Jag.

If all that is more important, then the ST-Line V is for you. The very antithesis, then, of the unassuming and unloved EcoSport the Puma usurps.

There’s nothing radical or ground-breaking about the third-gen version’s styling, other than it’s pretty and unmistakably a Qashqai. Even from tens of metres away. That’s a hallmark of good design.

But, like an Oscar’s worthy red-carpet outfit, the familiar lines remain classy on this third imagining, with a particularly strong front-end LED lighting graphics presence against a modern grille treatment, pleasing classical proportions and an elegantly executed posterior.

Unless you’re a train spotter-type or work for Nissan PR, it’s easy to miss the very minor details setting this particular Ti apart. Nissan dubs the extra glossy black lipstick up front as its ‘premium grille’ appearance. There’s a smattering of e-Power badges. And ground clearance drops 5.0mm, to 175mm. That’s it.

As with all current Qashqais, the e-Power offers larger packaging compared to before, as a result of adopting a fresh “global Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance platform”. The upshot is a longer, wider and taller small SUV, to the tune of 31, 30 and 29mm, respectively.

And, for the benefit of rear seat occupants, the wheelbase has also been stretched by 19mm.

It’s worth noting that, despite Nissan’s best efforts to keep the kilos down by deploying aluminium for the doors, bonnet and front guards (resulting in a commendable 60kg saving while body stiffness rises by 41 per cent), the e-Power attracts a hefty 200kg penalty over the ICE Ti.

Does this adversely affect efficiency? Please keep reading to find out.

If you search for the 1998 Puma coupe, you'll see some vague similarities with its modern SUV namesake, especially in their anthropomorphic face. It's in the eyes. There are also hints of Aston Martin (DBX), Porsche (Macan) and – let's face it – Mazda (CX-3).

Yet the real achievement lies in the way Ford has managed to make a 4.2-metre-long by 1.8m wide by 1.6m high crossover look so svelte, with the resulting balanced proportions, flowing lines and taut surfacing giving the Puma quite an athletic visual presence. After the EcoSport failure, head-turning looks were deemed paramount.

The extra girth gained by widening the Fiesta's platform allowed Ford's designers to create a muscular body that could also accommodate a metre-wide tailgate opening, while beneath the cargo floor is an exceptionally deep storage box, bringing better-than-expected practicality to boot.

Being bigger than before brings benefits.

The Qashqai’s doors open super-wide. Great for entry/egress, winning over SUV sceptics and inflicting damage on adjacent vehicles.

Once sat inside, the people-pleasing presentation continues in this sumptuously-presented Ti grade, with eyes immediately drinking in the pleated leather-faced seat patterns, subtle colour-coded trim, attractive dashboard architecture and the surprising depth of quality in the materials deployed.

As we discovered to our delight, all are further flattered when drenched in the dappled rays of an early autumnal afternoon sun, courtesy of that panoramic hole in the roof.

If you’re expecting the common-sense dullness of some less-ambitious Nissans, a significant mindset reset is required, highlighting the European aspirations of this cosy yet comfy British-built SUV.

In our comparatively brief time in the Qashqai, we also noted the excellent driving position, enveloping support of the fine front seats, user-friendliness of the digital displays (including the head-up dials), clear instrumentation that still manages to convey as much, or as little, data as you need without bamboozling you with info-overload, generous storage and an effective climate-control system.

Plus, that vast sunroof includes a full-sunblock screen – a feature sorely missing in many European and Chinese branded alternatives. Others, take heed.

Our main objection is obstructed over-the-shoulder and rear vision, that’s very obvious when parking in tight spots. Those cameras are essential.

Moving out the back, it’s fairly spacious for most people though knee room remains tight for longer-legged passengers. Most expected amenities are present, such as face-level air vents, USB-A and -C outlets, a centre armrest with cupholders and overhead lighting. And the upmarket ambience carries through, too.

But don’t go expecting any sliding or reclining back-seat versatility, as you might find in some rival SUVs.

Now, here’s an interesting fact. Nissan says there’s no drop in cargo capacity between the e-Power and the regular ICE-powered version of the Qashqai. Indeed, the figure increases, from 418 litres to 452L and, if you lower the back seat, from 1513 to 1518L.

So, how does this magic work? The location of the battery underneath the front seats (rather than under the rear bench) helps, as well as the elimination of the ICE Ti’s 19-inch alloy spare wheel for that infernal tyre-repair kit.

Win some, lose some!

Compact yet spacious, the ST-Line V's interior has strong as well as weak points.

Let's start with the latter. The most obvious connection with the Fiesta is in the Puma's dashboard, which is largely shared between the two. After all the effort expended on the design and chassis, this is somewhat disappointing. There's nothing wrong essentially with the fascia's aesthetics or functionality – it's just that the look is humdrum and dated. What's needed is something with the visual wow factor as found in the latest Peugeot 2008, especially at this price point.

Yet Ford has at least tried to put some tinsel inside this most expensive version of its smallest SUV.

Stitched perforated leather seat facings, carbon-fibre-look trim and soft vinyl coverings in key touchpoint areas bring an upmarket look and feel, backed up by a now-familiar digital instrumentation layout, a lovely flat-bottomed three-spoke steering wheel, easy and intuitive multimedia interface and a wireless phone charger. That electronic cluster, by the way, changes colour and markings but doesn't have the scope of multimedia displays of, say, Audi's Virtual Cockpit. It's comparatively rudimentary.

Conversely, there's a solidity and quietness as well, offering a level of refinement that's usually found in more-premium Euro alternatives. We weren't expecting that, though of course this is a German Ford product.

Our test car also boasted a vast glass opening sunroof, adding to the opulence. With all this gear, the ST-Line V's cabin is properly appealing.

On the practicality front, entry and egress is pretty good, the driving position is excellent (thanks in no small part to a big amount of adjustability for both the steering column and seats), the front cushions themselves are sumptuously enveloping, while wide door pockets and a big glovebox obviously come in useful. And there's a USB-C outlet in the centre cubby between the seats. How modern.

However, rear vision out is poor, there are no seat warmers and some of the lower-lying plastics are a bit drab.

The back seat isn't really suitable for people over 175cm, as kneeroom is limited and taller scalps may scrape the ceiling with the twin-pane sunroof in situ. The latter also means no overhead grab handles.

But the backrest angle and cushions themselves are fine, even for longer journeys. Just don't expect to squeeze a third adult in the back unless rubbing shoulders won't bug you. Note, too, that the rear cushion does not slide or tilt forward to allow for a lower load area when the backrest is folded down. Pity.

There is a receptacle in both doors for small bottles but no cupholders whatsoever (how can Ford call itself an American company?), or face-level air vents – though the large dash vent outputs do reach the rear. Amenities such as USBs and cupholders are AWOL; and vision out from back there is limited by the high shoulder line. Tough if you're trying to peer out. Sorry, Fido.

The Puma's overall compact footprint and rear packaging clearly suggest that this is aimed at singles, couples, or couples with smaller kids/pets to transport around.

Still, for a small SUV, the cargo area isn't bad at all. The standard floor depth is fairly generous, with a long and flat loading area, but below that is a narrower yet deeper waterproof area, while under that again is a space-saver spare wheel. Clever. Also intelligent is the luggage cover that lifts automatically with the tailgate, as per Mazda's CX-5.

For the record, cargo capacity is rated at 410 litres with the 60/40 split-fold rear seats erect – or 1170L with them folded down flat. These figures far outstrip the CX-3.

To sum the cabin experience… it's far-better than its Fiesta-sourced dashboard may suggest, while the ST-Line V treatment goes a long way in helping justify the premium. That's a win.

In Australia, the Puma plays in the burgeoning 'Light SUV' segment, so goes up against the ageing yet athletic Mazda CX-3 as well as Honda's HR-V, along with more recent challengers like the Hyundai Venue, Kia Stonic, Nissan Juke II, Toyota Yaris Cross and Volkswagen T-Cross. All are ready to pounce on the bestselling Hiroshima crossover.

What every one of these baby SUVs have in common is that they're based on B-segment – or supermini – platforms. However, prices and sizes do blur in this corner of the class, with larger small-car-derived rivals from the 'Small SUV' segment above, led by the Mitsubishi ASX, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona, also in the Ford's crosshairs.

Formidable opponents indeed, and just like that, the first big hurdle appears for the Blue Oval hopeful. Puma is Light SUV-sized but Small SUV-priced, with the entry-level grade kicking off from a tenner under $30,000, and before on-road costs. That's even more expensive than the VW.

This instantly eliminates it from many buyers' radars.

In contrast, a CX-3 Neo Sport starts from just $22,890. But that's with a manual gearbox, plain interior and steel wheels, whereas the Puma includes a ripper turbo engine/auto combo, climate control, a smartphone app that allows for remote vehicle location/ locking/unlocking/starting, voice-activated sat nav, wireless smartphone charging, lane-departure warning and assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver impairment monitor, 17-inch alloys and a leather steering wheel.

Along with other goodies like AEB with pedestrian alert, reverse camera, Bluetooth audio and telephony, Apple CarPlay/Android auto, digital radio, live traffic updates, fuel-saving engine stop/start, auto headlights, rain-sensing wipers, adaptive cornering fog lights, powered folding mirrors, push-button start and puddle lamps, the Puma looks and feels up-spec inside. To match most of that stuff in the CX-3 you'll need a Maxx Sport auto from $26,890.

Rising to the $32,340 ST-Line drops the Puma's ride height by just 2mm (to 164mm), but adds firmer suspension, a body kit, glitzier alloys, sports seats, a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, flat-bottomed steering wheel, paddle shifters and racier trim for a racier experience, though it loses the climate control for a manual air-con set-up. Strange. This grade might just be the sweet spot in the Ford's range, though it does sit about $1300 higher than the CX-3 sTouring equivalent.

Finally, the subject of this test, the ST-Line V, scores privacy glass, lashings of chrome, keyless entry/start, leather upholstery, climate control, premium audio, a powered tailgate and 18-inch alloys. All for $35,540, it's about on a par with CX-3 Akari, but lacks the latter's powered driver's seat and heated front cushions, among other items. The Mazda also goes one better with a $2000 AWD option from all mid-level grades up, as well as manual availability.

We recommend the $1500 Park Package, which ushers in adaptive cruise control with full stop/go and lane-centring tech, as well as blind-spot detection and auto parking. Premium paint adds $650, a panoramic roof $2000, roof rails $250 and a black roof $500.

Against compelling alternatives costing less, like the high-flying Seltos Sport+, CX-30 G20 Touring and Toyota C-HR Koba, the ST-Line V struggles to make sense on paper. Can the Puma's cabin and driving experience claw back its obvious price disadvantage?

Under the e-Power’s bonnet is a 1.5-litre three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine featuring a unique and intriguing, efficiency-enhancing yet performance-boosting, variable compression ratio.

It produces 116kW of power and 250Nm of torque on its own, and is mated to a small-ish 2.1kWh lithium-ion battery and inverter, powering an electric motor that sends drive, via a single-speed reduction-gear transmission, to the front wheels. A set-up Nissan calls 'e-CVT'.

Combined power and torque maximums are 140kW and a considerable 330Nm, respectively. Tipping the scales at 1728kg, the Ti e-Power’s power-to-weight ratio is a healthy 81kW/tonne.

Along with 'Sport' and 'Eco' modes, there’s also a one-pedal driving option that provides electricity-saving regenerative braking that washes off a good deal of speed to substantially slow you down. It's a stepping stone between a hybrid and full EV and you never need to plug it in anywhere.

Nissan made myriad changes to the MacPherson-style strut front and multi-link rear suspension design to accommodate all the additional electrification tech.

Remember towing capacity is half that of the regular Qashqai’s 1500kg (braked trailer), dropping to the latter’s 750kg unbraked figure.

A multiple international engine-of-the-year winner, the compact and lightweight, 999cc 1.0-litre twin-cam three-cylinder turbo petrol unit is the sole choice for now. Driving the front wheels via a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission (DCT), it delivers 92kW of power and 170Nm of torque.

With no all-wheel drive option, there are instead five driving modes – Normal, Sport, Slippery (for snow) and Trail (gravel) applications, working on the traction, stability and transmission algorithms to mimic some of the benefits of AWD. In the ST-Line V, a set of paddle shifters are fitted in lieu of the sadly-absent manual gearbox.

Owners of the previous-shape Fiesta S and EcoSport would be familiar with the 1.0T's smooth and strident performance, though these 2010s models used a completely different type of DCT. This was the highly-publicised Powershift, which consisted of a dry-clutch system, and was prone to a multitude of problems and failures in the petrol-powered auto versions.

In contrast, the Puma adopts a next-generation transmission dubbed 7DCT300; related to the item found in some smaller Mercedes-Benz, Renault and Nissan models, it instead employs a more-robust wet-clutch system with a higher torque threshold, so promises to be far more durable and reliable than the problematic old dry-clutch unit.

Nissan reckons the Ti e-Power should average around 5.2L/100km on a combined urban, extra-urban cycle, which equates to a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 117 grams/km.

We managed a still-commendable 5.8L as indicated by the trip computer, but we did not have a chance to test it at the pump.

Note, as with all Qashqais, the e-Power needs more-expensive 95 RON premium unleaded petrol. Brimming the 55L fuel tank, expect a range of up to around 1050km between refills. That's 150km up on the regular 1.3L turbo versions.

The Puma's official combined average fuel consumption figure is just 5.3 litres per 100km, which works out to 121 grams per kilometre. Fitted with a 42-litre fuel tank, the potential range averages out to almost 800km between refills.

Out in the real world, we managed an exceptional 6.2L/100km, no doubt helped by an ever-eager stop/start system (which, annoyingly, kills the air-con when it extinguishes the engine; we found ourselves constantly pressing that 'off' button as the days wore on). This figure was achieved in motorway-heavy driving scenarios, albeit loaded with holiday gear and with the air-con blaring.

So, we took another, urban-focused test, in lots of slow-moving traffic situations, and averaged a still-solid 8.0L/100km.

Note, that while the Puma requires 95 RON premium unleaded, it's also perfectly happy on – and is even recommended by Ford for – the cheapest petrol currently offered in Australia, 94 RON E10 unleaded. Either way, the ST-Line V is a frugal small SUV.

Two things are obvious soon after the driver presses the starter and silently whooshes away in a Qashqai Ti e-Power.

Firstly, there’s a real weight to it, highlighting this as a solid (as well as heavy) vehicle of substance. And, secondly, once over this initial impression, everything then seems completely normal and intuitive. There’s nothing alien going on here.

Despite the mass, acceleration is brisk, with throttle response becoming even livelier once on the move, since you can feel all that instant torque on tap, even with a light flex of your right foot.

Pushing down harder, it should soon become clear this is a fast machine, so keep an eye on that digital speedo display. It caught us out a couple of times during our test drive through central Victoria.

Using the driving modes reveals varying behaviour according to the settings. In Eco mode the e-Power has a smooth and relaxed gait; performance is Normal seems more spirited while in Sport responses are appropriately stronger and more urgent.

It’s worth keeping the latter in mind, because the chassis is set up for a sporty, Euro feel, meaning there’s a tautness to the suspension that's a little at odds with the plushness of the interior. This isn’t a soft, bouncy ride.

Rolling on a 235/50 R19 wheel and tyre package, there’s a pleasing balance of steering feel, handling agility and roadholding grip, resulting in a dynamically athletic and reassuringly controlled vehicle, even at speed through tighter corners. However, as with the e-Power’s acceleration delivery, the keener driver has to first push through a level of inertia to discover this.

One trait worth keeping in mind is that the tail can become loose and even slide out a little before the ESC quickly yet calmly reels it back in, if you attempt to take a bend too fast. Beware, though, that as the roads were hot and dry during our drive, we cannot attest to how this behaviour will manifest in the wet. Should be fun if you’re a keener driver. We weren’t expecting that.

What else? The easy e-Pedal function works well, providing significant braking up to a point, without bringing the vehicle to a full stop. It soon feels second nature.

Plus, unlike most Toyota hybrids, many EVs and even the X-Trail Ti e-Power we tested recently, the smaller-brother Qashqai avoids that oddly wooden brake-pedal feel, though again, a test in inner-urban traffic may reveal something else.

And, finally, over coarse-chip surfaces, there’s a bit too much tyre or road-noise intrusion coming inside, though over the smoother stuff, you’ll also feel blissfully cocooned in the comfort the Ti packaging provides.

Overall, then, the Qashqai e-Power is a swift, agile and entertaining drive, as well as safe and secure, revealing a further depth to Nissan’s engineering talent and capability.

If the Puma's pricing is complicated, its cabin surprising accommodating and its real-world efficiency particularly parsimonious, then the upward trajectory of pros over cons continues with performance that's downright spirited.

Around town first. A small-displacement engine plus a turbo plus a DCT usually spell interminable spells of lag when all the driver longs for is an instant and measured response to a right foot flexing down onto the throttle.

But the Ford largely sidesteps such pitfalls. Though momentarily hesitant at take-off, the three-pot turbo does then get down to business in no time, with a sustained and satisfying surge of thrust as the revs grow, accompanied by a lusty and raspy thrum that's entirely in keeping with the Puma's track-pants appearance. And it doesn't let up either, with speed building up strongly through the gears, and much more so than the mere 999ccs suggest. Great for overtaking, or taking over a rapidly diminishing gap in the peak-hour derby.

Selecting Sport (a fiddly action that's located too far from the driver for safe eyes-on-the-road operation) lights an even bigger fire in the Puma's belly, with punchier acceleration and a very attentive transmission tune, slicing seamlessly through the seven ratios, leaving you in awe that a heart so small can possess such deep lungs.

Where the Ford really leaves an indelible mark is its enthusiasm to corner just as keenly, armed with brilliantly slick steering and a planted chassis that is set up to both encourage and interact with the driver. Minimal body roll and lots of grip from a quality quartet of Continental tyres ensure the Puma can be punted about like a sporty little hatchback, while the electronic safety tech allowing just enough leeway for lots of fun before they gently reel everything back into line.

We cannot think of a more enjoyable small SUV. And, by the way, those same driver-assist systems provide exceptionally nuanced lane-keep and adaptive cruise-control intervention – certainly they're right up there with the premium SUV brigade.

Given that our Puma wore 215/50R18 rubber, on a 'sports' suspension tune, the ride around town is commendable, with ample cushioning from the rough stuff. There is some tautness to the ride, but it isn't hard or rough; the ST-Line V walks a fine line between urban-agility and surface-decay isolation. In other words, it's commendably relaxing to travel in.

At higher speeds, some road and tyre noises do permeate through inside, and those Dumbo door mirrors do create some wind whoosh, but overall, given how dynamic the chassis is, the Puma feels grown up and sophisticated.

Tested under the 2019 Euro NCAP crash-test regime, the Puma scores a top five-star ANCAP rating.

However, this means it does not meet the more stringent frontal offset crash, side impact crash and far-side impact crash-test criteria introduced by ANCAP for 2020 model-year vehicles – despite launching in September of that year.

Safety items include dual front, front-seat side and side curtain airbags (six in total), AEB with pedestrian and cyclist detection (working between 7km/h and 80km/h), lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, traffic-sign recognition, driver fatigue alert, rear parking sensors, tyre pressure monitors and emergency assistance. These come on top of anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake assist, stability control and traction control.

As mentioned earlier, adaptive cruise control, active park assistance, front parking sensors and blind-spot detection are part of the $1500 'Park Package'. Do it.

Like all Qashqais, the Ti e-Power offers a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty that also includes roadside assistance. Nothing unusual there.

Service intervals are at every 12 months or 10,000km. The latter is 5000km sooner than in the ICE equivalent, by the way.

Nissan also offers a choice of servicing options, starting with the Capped Price Servicing that is nearly a thousand dollars cheaper than the regular ICE versions of the Qashqai over the six-year period as published on the company’s website, at around $2850.

Pay in advance and there’s an additional 10 per cent discount. Of course, terms and conditions apply.

Ford offers the industry-average warranty of five-years/unlimited kilometres. Services intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km.

There is also a capped-price servicing scheme under the 'Ford Service Benefits' banner, with the first four years/60,000km of 'A and B' logbook services pegged at $299 per visit, and then between $320 and $560, for up to 12 years.

There is also a Ford loan car program, SYNC 3 map updates and Motoring Club Membership included during that time frame.