Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Honda CR-V

What's the difference?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug-in Hybrid EV is an interesting inclusion for the brand, especially as it is typically considered a ‘value player’ in the market.

But with negligible real-world fuel consumption benefits if you drive beyond the limited EV range and a high price premium over the non-PHEV models, it’s important you see if the sums add up for your particular needs.

Primarily going to use the car for running around town? Cool. Think the 50-ish-kay EV range will work for you and make you happy? Amazing. Sold on the look of the car? Hat tipped.

But let me say this - if you are considering the Eclipse Cross PHEV, there are some alternatives you should also have on your list, including the MG HS PHEV, the Hyundai Ioniq PHEV, Kia Niro PHEV, and - the one I’d buy - a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. For me, plug-in hybrid tech is a bit of a halfway house, in most instances offering too high a price premium for the range you’re getting to drive electric. Heck, a Kona Electric isn’t much more than the top-spec Exceed PHEV, and I’d have that if I wanted a real day-to-day EV experience.

The Honda CR-V RS hybrid has plenty going for it. It’s a well-rounded package with good levels of comfort and practicality, and a driving experience that’s easy to live with day to day.

There are a few areas that hold it back from leading the segment. The multimedia system feels behind the curve for a flagship grade, and the engine can become vocal under load. Some rivals also edge ahead when it comes to outright equipment.

Even so, the CR-V still delivers where it counts. It’s efficient, spacious and comfortable.

You’re going to be able to tell the PHEV model from its more conventional counterparts by those oversized ‘Plug-in Hybrid EV’ badges on the front doors, and if you want to tell those behind you what you’re driving, there’s also a ‘PHEV’ badge there, too. Wait, wasn’t the plan to do away with the term ‘PHEV’, Mitsubishi? 

But aside from that, the outside features just the different 18-inch alloy wheels (which are the same on all PHEV models, no matter the cost - I think that’s a bit lame, because if I’m spending $7500 on the Exceed I’d like a different wheel design!). Oh, and the Aspire and Exceed get that different lower front splitter, too.

Plus the PHEV has two fuel filler doors - one on each side of the car over the rear wheels. The driver’s side one is the EV charging ports (x2 - detailed below), and the passenger’s side one is for the petrol. Note: while the EV port is push-openable, the petrol cap still requires you to lift a lever in the driver’s footwell. 

It may be categorised a small SUV but at 4545mm long, riding on a 2670mm wheelbase, 1805mm wide and 1685mm tall, it’s big for its boots. The popular Mazda CX-5 is only 5mm longer, and it plays in the midsize SUV segment!

Inside there are some design differences, with a specific gear joystick-style selector, and a different instrument panel.

It is impressive how the brand has managed to shoehorn a petrol engine, two electric motors, a battery pack and more into the car, but there are some practicality implications. Read about them in the next section.

The CR-V hasn’t changed much since this generation launched in 2023, but it remains a purposeful-looking SUV for the segment. A slightly longer body and 198mm of ground clearance give it a bit more presence on the road than some of its rivals.

The silhouette is clean and confident, lifted by black 19-inch alloy wheels, matching door handles and a sharply styled honeycomb grille.

Inside, the cabin reflects the RS grade nicely. The embossed leather seats with red contrast stitching add a sporty edge, while the dashboard design feels cohesive and well thought out. The honeycomb air vents tie in nicely with the grille and look modern. There's a satisfying tactility throughout, with plenty of soft-touch materials and clicky buttons. The panoramic sunroof and black headliner also give a subtle sense of sophistication.

As far as flagship grades go, it looks the part.

Up front, the cabin is a pretty smart place, with nice enough materials and finishes, and a few good storage options. There’s a cubby in front of the shifter, but oddly enough it doesn’t have a wireless charger (there are 2x USB 2.0 ports above) and isn’t quite big enough for a smartphone (even the smaller ones don’t fit there all that easily), and there are cup holders between the seats, a decent covered centre console bin, and door pockets large enough for bottles.

The PHEV models get a different instrument cluster dial for EV driving readout info, but all have the old-school 4.2-inch TFT colour display that lacks the size and usability of some rivals with larger info screens - the MG HS PHEV, for instance, has a 12.3-inch digital display, which shows you a lot more info than this tiny little screen does. Heck, there’s not even a digital speedometer in there - and you only get one if you buy the Exceed model, which has a head-up display (HUD).

That’s part of the problem with the way this car’s interface operates. If you want the most detailed information you need to use the touchscreen media system, but that negates the usability of the media functions. On multiple occasions I found myself switching between Apple CarPlay phone calls and searching for that particular driving info screen I found most useful (there are about 15 screens to choose from, and plenty of them are hard to decipher).

It’s a huge disappointment for a customer who might want to see all that detailed information but also listen to a podcast, answer a call, follow their phone’s mapping or just have anything other than the hybrid info come up on the infotainment screen. The screen itself - an 8.0-inch unit, with sat nav integrated into the top spec only - is fine, but small compared to today’s rivals.

In the back seat, there’s a compromise for cabin space. The leg room is good, but the seat has been bumped up to accommodate some of the electrical hardware and the petrol tank, meaning someone my size (182cm/6’0”) will find they’ve got enough room for their legs but not their head, and those even larger will really need to take care getting in and out. While pre-facelift examples of this car had a clever sliding second row seat, that’s gone. It was never a feature in any PHEV version, and undoubtedly the layout of the battery pack has something to do with that. 

The double pane sunroof no doubt eats into the space in the rear to a degree as well, and in the Exceed it likely feels a bit more cramped because of the black headliner. 

While three adults could potentially fit across the back row for very short trips, there are dual ISOFIX and three top-tether points for child seats. The Exceed is the one you want if you’re aiming to treat your rear-seat passengers right: it has heated rear outboard seats, rear directional air vents and two USB ports for charging - the ES and Aspire miss out on all that stuff.  

Boot space is 359L (VDA) for PHEV models, which is a step down from the 405 litres (VDA) for the non-hybrid models. There is extra hardware under the floor, and you don’t get a spare wheel in the PHEV models either - instead there’s a tyre repair kit. For context, we only just managed to fit all three CarsGuide hard suitcases (124L, 95L and 36L) in the boot of the PHEV version, while it was far less of an issue in the non-PHEV.

Oddly, no model comes with a power tailgate. 

Up front, there’s plenty of space and the seats are comfortable over longer drives, helped by the extra adjustment and functions on offer. The seat bases are on the shorter side though, so I would have liked to see extendable under-thigh support for added comfort.

Storage is well thought out, making it easy to keep things tidy. There’s a deep centre console, two cupholders and decent door bins, along with a large tray that houses the wireless charging pad and two USB-C ports.

In the back, legroom is generous and the seats themselves are comfortable, especially with the heat function on the outboard seats. The transmission tunnel is also not too high for middle seaters. Headroom is a touch tighter, due to the panoramic sunroof, but it’s not a dealbreaker. The wide-opening rear doors also make access easy.

Features in the backseat are a little more modest than expected for a flagship. You get directional air vents and a couple of USB-C ports, but miss out on extras like separate climate controls and device pockets. There are two ISOFIX points and three top-tether anchors, though realistically two child seats will fit best.

Around the back, the 581L boot capacity means it easily handled luggage for four adults along with a weekend shop. This grade also includes a powered tailgate, though it makes do with a tyre repair kit rather than a spare, which won't suit everyone.

From the driver’s seat, the tech experience is a bit of a mixed bag. The multimedia system feels dated, both in size and graphics, and some settings can be fiddly to locate and adjust, including the head-up display. Wireless Apple CarPlay is a welcome inclusion, though it did take a few attempts to connect initially. Once paired, it’s been reliable.

On the plus side, Honda has kept physical buttons and dials for key functions, which makes a big difference to everyday usability. Very little is buried in menus, and it all feels intuitive to operate on the move.

There are six grades in the CR-V range, split across petrol and hybrid powertrains. We’re testing the flagship e:HEV RS hybrid here, priced from $64,400 drive-away. That puts it toward the upper end of the segment. The Hyundai Tucson Hybrid Premium undercuts it at $58,350, while the Toyota RAV4 Cruiser Hybrid AWD sits at $60,340 and Kia Sportage GT-Line Hybrid is $60,370.

However, Honda's pricing is drive-away and includes on-road costs, whereas those rivals do not. When you consider that, the pricing isn't that much different.

For the money, the RS presents as well-specified and you'll enjoy a panoramic sunroof, heated and ventilated electric front seats, heated outer rear seats, leather upholstery and a heated steering wheel. It covers the comfort brief without issue.

Where it loses a tiny bit of ground is in the tech. There’s a strong base with a 12-speaker Bose sound system, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, built-in satellite navigation and a head-up display. But the 9.0-inch touchscreen feels undersized for a flagship in this segment, especially when rivals have moved to 12.3-inch (and above) displays as standard.

Practical touches are solid, with dual-zone climate control, four USB-C ports and a powered tailgate. However, the hybrid's switch to a tyre repair kit instead of a temporary spare is another area where competitors have the edge.

While the CR-V RS hybrid ticks plenty of boxes on paper, it doesn’t quite match the breadth of equipment offered elsewhere, though it remains competitive overall for the segment.

The plug-in hybrid version runs a non-turbocharged 2.4-litre Atkinson cycle petrol engine producing just 94kW and 199Nm.

Meagre outputs, but the petrol unit is backed by two electric motors - the front motor has outputs of 60kW/137Nm, while the rear motor produces 70kW/195Nm. It’s all controlled by a single-speed transmission.

There is no ‘combined power output’ figure, but there is a 13.8kWh lithium-ion battery pack as part of the equation as well.

The engine can power the battery pack in series hybrid driving mode, so if you want to top up the batteries before you get to a city, you can. And there is regenerative braking, of course. More on recharging in the next section.

The CR-V RS hybrid is all-wheel drive and pairs a 2.0-litre four-cylinder Atkinson-cycle engine with two electric motors, delivering up to 135kW and 355Nm. Both figures are a bit lower than its Kia and Hyundai rivals, which both produce up to 173kW/367Nm, but for the most part, there’s enough punch for both city driving and longer highway runs.

The electronic continuously variable transmission (e-CVT) can get a bit vocal under load though, particularly on hills where it tends to hold higher revs.

The Eclipse Cross PHEV has an official combined cycle fuel consumption figure of 1.9L/100km. That’s astounding, really, but you need to realise that the test calculation is only for the first 100 kays - there’s a really good chance your real-world consumption will be a lot higher, as you can only deplete the battery charge once before calling on the engine (and your petrol tank) to juice it back up.

Electric driving range is stated at 55km based on NEDC cycle testing, while the WLTP rating is a more realistic 45km. In our testing we fell between the two during our “fully charged” 100km run, in which the electric charge initially ran for 50km. But, over the 100km run, the dashboard info screen said the car used “82 per cent” electric driving, while somehow also showing 3.9L/100km for petrol consumption.

I did the numbers at the fuel filler, and the actual return was 4.5L/100km. That’s okay, but not nearly as spectacular as you might hope, and I’ve seen very close in a RAV4 hybrid - which in most instances is cheaper than the Eclipse Cross despite being bigger and, frankly, a lot better.

I also ran the car for a further 100 kays without plugging in, just to see what the ‘worst case scenario’ might be - and it wasn’t too bad, with the fuel consumption jumping to a real-world return of 5.5L/100km. But again, that’s worse than you’ll likely get with a RAV4…

When it comes to charging/recharging, there is available AC charging using a Type 2 plug that can fully recharge the battery in as little as 3.5 hours, according to the brand. DC fast charging with a CHAdeMO plug should fill from zero to 80 per cent in 25 minutes. Maximum charge input is 3.6kW.

Like me, you’ll want to do the maths to see what is going to be the most economical way to run your car - aside from just plugging it in at the office and hoping nobody notices.

A standard 10-amp household plug - which should take about seven hours to replenish the batteries - could cost as little as $1.88 to get back your circa-50km EV range - that’s based on overnight charging, off-peak, on an average 13.6c/kWh electricity price. Of course, if you’re considering a PHEV, you might have a solar array and the electricity could well be free. Good for you.

But remember, there’s more to it than just the electricity costs - you need to also consider the additional purchase budget required just to get into the PHEV model over a regular Eclipse Cross. 

The CR-V hybrid has a claimed combined fuel consumption of 5.7L/100km. Paired with a 57-litre fuel tank, that gives it a theoretical driving range of around 1000km, which is strong for a mid-size SUV.

In the real world, I saw 6.7L/100km over the week. That’s still a solid result, especially considering how much highway driving was involved, where hybrids typically aren’t at their most efficient.

If you’re after that electric car thrill of near-silent, almost mind-blowing acceleration, the Eclipse Cross mightn’t be the right car for you

But if swift progress and the buzz you get from taking off from the traffic lights without any hesitation at all is more your thing, it could be great for you. And if you’re not quite ready to go “full EV”, then it’s probably something you’re considering.

The EV driving mode is the best driving mode in this car. You can run it just on the petrol engine to ensure you save your battery range, and you might choose to do that when you’re driving on the freeway and know you’re approaching an urban area where the EV goodness will be better used. Or you could have it so it's using battery and petrol power, and that’s where you’ll get maximum combined performance.

But running the car in the default, EV-prioritised mode means you will make the best of this powertrain's strengths, because - for the fifty odd kays you’ll get out of the battery - it’s pretty good.

It’s also impressive the way this powertrain dips between petrol engine, battery pack or both at higher speeds. When the battery range had depleted on my test drive, the engine kicked in almost imperceptibly, working to power the car and also generate more electricity for the battery pack. It then dipped out of petrol, back to battery, and so on and so forth, multiple times during my drive. 

The best thing about the way it did so was that it was smooth. There is barely any vibration from the petrol engine, the transmission doesn’t have any gears to fumble with, and overall the refinement is really good.

There are drive modes - Eco, Normal, Snow, Gravel and Tarmac - and in my test I kept to Normal. I did fiddle with the regenerative braking reactiveness, though, using the paddleshifters to dial up or down the aggressiveness of the energy recoup system. It doesn’t feel as aggressive as some pure electric cars, but thankfully it has a decent pedal feel and progression when you apply the brakes yourself. 

The steering is light and lacks feel, and doesn’t offer that much engagement or involvement. That might matter to you if you’re like me. I wish it was more fun. But at least it’s easy to park.

While the suspension is fine and comfortable on the highway, it can feel wooden and the ride is quite lumpy at low speeds. It never really feels all that well resolved for urban driving, which is a bit of a downer considering that’s likely where a car like this will spend most of its time

The tune of the suspension - being a bit firm at lower pace - surprisingly doesn’t have any payoff when it comes to cornering, as it lacks a bit of body control, shifting its weight side to side. 

All in all it is a decent plug-in hybrid offering – and will be perfectly suitable to someone who wants some EV driving as a part of their lifestyle. It’s just a matter of doing the maths as to whether it will work for you.

On the road, the RS hybrid has enough power to keep things moving, even on winding hills, though you do need to lean into the throttle to get the most out of it. The engine can sound quite strained under load, but it’s more noise than anything, with performance still holding up.

Through corners, it feels more dynamic than you might expect. The suspension and steering lean firm and responsive, which makes it a capable tourer. That said, road noise does creep into the cabin, particularly on longer drives, and takes a bit of the shine off.

To maximise energy recovery, you can switch from Drive to B mode to increase regenerative braking. It’s especially useful in stop-start traffic or on hilly roads, though it does mean you can’t use cruise control in this setting.

Around town, visibility and parking are made easier with a 360-degree camera. The image is clear, although the slight fish-eye effect takes a little getting used to. Once you’re familiar with it, though, it’s a straightforward car to manoeuvre.

The CR-V holds a four-star ANCAP safety rating from testing conducted in 2023. While that’s not class-leading, it’s backed by a solid list of safety equipment.

There are 10 airbags in total, including side chest airbags for both rows, which is a nice inclusion given many rivals reserve these for the front seats only. You do miss out on features like emergency call functionality and side exit assist, though.

The broader safety suite includes blind-spot monitoring, lane keeping aid, lane departure warning, traffic sign recognition, rear cross-traffic alert, a driver attention monitor and tyre pressure monitoring.

On the road, most of these systems operate unobtrusively. The adaptive cruise control can be a little slow to respond when accelerating, but otherwise it doesn’t interfere with everyday driving.

For families, there are two ISOFIX points and three top-tether anchor points in the rear. The RS also includes a forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking, which operates between 5.0 and 195km/h and can detect cars, pedestrians and cyclists.

There’s a huge 10 year/200,000 kilometre warranty on offer - but it’s valid if you maintain your car with Mitsubishi’s dedicated dealer service network over the 10 years/200,000km timeline, or else you get a five-year/100,000km plan.

But while the rest of the car will be covered by that decade-long warranty if you service it with Mitsubishi, the battery is only covered for eight years/160,000km, no matter where you have the car serviced.

Maintenance is due every 12 months/15,000km. But just a note - the more complex powertrain means higher service costs than the regular turbo-petrol versions. The annual fees are: $299, $399, $299, $399, $299, $799, $299, $799, $399, $799; so an average cost of $339 for the first five years, or $558.90 per visit over 10 years/150,000kn. 

Included for customers who service their car with the brand is four years of roadside assist.

Do you have questions over reliability, issues, concerns, recalls, automatic transmission problems, or anything else of that ilk? Check out our Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross problems page.

The CR-V is covered by Honda’s five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, which is below average now for the segment. However, it can be extended by a further three years if you service exclusively through Honda.

Ownership costs are where it stands out positively. You get five years of complimentary roadside assistance, along with a capped-price servicing program where visits are just $199 each. That’s one of the more affordable offerings in this class. For context, the Toyota RAV4 comes in at $325 per service over the same period, followed by $458 for the Hyundai Tucson and $583 for the Kia Sportage.

Service intervals are set at every 12 months or 10,000km, whichever comes first.